Phenomenons All

download Phenomenons All

of 6

Transcript of Phenomenons All

  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    1/6

    ABC Of The UniverseApproaching the Grand Unified Theory

    byHakan OK

    Phenomenons

    Dark Matter & Energy;(04.04.2011-00:00)It is an observed fact (I assume) and obvious

    that gravity has no counter-pole, instead consistsof a monopole which is, the attraction of matter

    (atoms) with each other by a so called graviton.This attraction has its opponent or counterfeit inthe centrifugal force and/or motion, as seen onplanetary, galactic and cluster/super-clusterscales. Although it seems not to be possible yet(may change any moment) telling the nature(purpose/intention) and behavior of Dark Matterand/or Dark Energy between large clumps of

    matter like galaxies, local galaxy-clusters and super-clusters, for a moment we should

    assume that, the bigger (/more/grater sized)matter is clumped, the lower gets the density ofspace and the gravitational force between thoseclumps, again leaving gaps of low-density andlow-gravity which are acting (beyond any criticaldensity of matter and its gravitational effects) asa phenomenon we call dark matter & energy.Dark matter IS matter beyond (below) critical

    density (I call it TOTAL SINGULARITY), TOTAL VACUUM and dark energy IS the counterfeit/opponent (itsdi-/counter-pole) to gravity itself (my assumption of zero-gravity). Do NOT scramble the total singularity

    explained here with any (various) conventional singularities caused by black-holes. Black holes are high-density matter clumps with high gravitational and electromagnetic emission effects, whereas thesingularity caused by low-density matter has NO gravitational effect at all (or at least a very small) and

    either no electromagnetic emission and thatswhy it's called DARK MATTER. Beyond (below ofcourse) a critical density, matter seems toloose any (gravitational) connection to eachother and starts acting in a very strange kind

    of being, like a singularity, but this time it is atotal one. Dark matter, as the name says, is

    dark, it does not emit heat (photons) and/orany other electromagnetic force (Which means it

    has a heat temperature of absolute zero.), hasno gravitational effects (because of low-densitymatter beyond/below the CDH), neither does itoccupy any space (nothingness but WITH avolume of vacuum forming a gap) and has acause of stopping time (timeless/irrelevant). If

    you get in touch with dark matter, either you add matter (maybe a finger) to its mass, disturbing its low-density state, causing it to get being or it evaporates that moment your finger and spills it out

    somewhere else, preferable at the opposite side of the dark-matter-concentration. And this happens in no-time. Whether you prefer a black hole or worm-hole to make far distances close or use the dark matter

    clumps (they are not clumps but however...) to jump trough far distances, the less pain generating is thelast one. But these dark matter clumps are not even and have no symmetric shapes because of the

    various matter-clumps around its location (eg. Two or more galaxies withdrawing, closing or passing oneach other), that's a problem... But one is for sure, if there is no matter beyond (below) critical densitybetween clumps, then there is a gravitational connection which makes any dark matter betweenimpossible. That means the clumps are connected with each other. So it needs big (maybe very big)distances between clumps of matter to make any dark matter possible, to rip apart their gravitationalconnection. Photons coming from far and entering that dark matter are being sucked on one side and

    Illustration 1: The Shape may change in relation to gravitational fields andmatter-clumps around effecting.

  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    2/6

    ABC Of The UniverseApproaching the Grand Unified Theory

    byHakan OK

    spilled out on the other side of the (non-) volume, maybe causing the redshift. I don't know how thisshould work, but it was worth some thinking...

    (pictures and context, updated on: 13.04.2011 12:37)

    12.04.2011 09:40 Fragment-Thoughts

    Critical Density Horizon (CDH);-Density (or Pressure)-Mass

    -Distance-Temperature

    -Gravity-EM emission (heat)

    According to Dark Matter:Low-density/-gravity gaps (volumes of vacuum) are Dark Matter. Because of the clumping of galaxiessomewhere far away, from galaxy-clumps, below (beyond) the critical density horizon, there are regionsof non-matter I call dark-matter-gaps.The point is, that you can not approach the gap of singularity without disturbing its state.

    Dark Matter Gap, Vacuum, Total Singularity, Volume of Non-Emitting Vacuum.Close to each galactic core density and gravity of matter increases, up to black-hole singularities. This

    black-hole singularities are no Total Singularities, (as) because they emit electromagnetism with highfrequency and have dense gravitational fields. They have effects on Space-Time, according to the theory

    of relativity.Matter do get colder if density decreases. Zero/Absolute Zero beyond (below) CDH means lower(decreased) frequency (below/beyond microwaves).

    Volumes of lower-density and -gravity gaps, with decreasing density and gravitational effect (and orbitalmove?), by increasing distance.Energy is decreasing with decreasing density. Beyond CDH, no (EM) energy observable. (12:08)

    According to Dark Energy:As we have analyzed before, the counterfeit or opposite force of (the pulling force) gravity is, move(usually orbital move, pushing matter away from the gravity-/matter-clumps, pushing force).

    Prediction: Distance to next CDH from ourworld is 50.000 Lightyears.(14.04.2011 14:30)

    Hyperspace:As seen on the left, there might be solutions tobridge the distance between two galaxies via this

    so called dark matter gaps (hyperspace).Depending on calculations (which I didn't), it

    may be possible to find CDH's not only betweengalaxies, but also between stars. Which mayallow us to travel interstellar distances in lesstime than we assumed before. This gaps or

    fields of vacuum may provide a shortcut troughhyperspace (the 5th dimension), just like a star-

    gate, as seen on TV. These gaps might be more even than gaps between galaxies. Still sounds likescience-fiction, right ?

  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    3/6

    ABC Of The UniverseApproaching the Grand Unified Theory

    byHakan OK

    The feature of matter is:It clumps to molecular structures. This is because of the gravitational force. A clumping above the critical

    density horizon and density triggers the EM-Force and causes heat (above 0 Kelvin).Dark Matter Gaps (clouds) depend on distance and mass of matter-clumps on their peripheral shape....to be continued (not finished yet...)

  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    4/6

    -ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons2utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

    DF3.04.2011, Cumartesi 13:00akale: Phenomenons2azan : Hakan OK

    Phenomenons 2he Truth;

    23.04.2011 13:08)is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept under raps)at, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I

    ust don't understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists,heoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, ample theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientistsmaybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in theironsciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe becameeing. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to beade (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those

    ssumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threateneds kind of a (sometimes ultimate) truth by this public.

    evelations, Hoax or Truth?ave you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment thatey may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge?am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge , whichey should at least try to falsify*. Although there's another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this

    as to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to informationat may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it?

    or example:either the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, "The guidance isod's guidance." If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protectou against God. [2:120]

    id those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That Wemade from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30]

    When Our signs are recited to them, they say, "We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the samehing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!" [8:31]

    he one who says to his parents: "Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when theenerations who died before me never came back?" While they both will implore God: "Woe to you; acknowledge!or God's promise is the truth." He would say, "This is nothing but tales from the past!" [46:17]

    When Our signs are recited to him, he says: "Tales of the ancients!" [83:13]hese words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fittingto what was described. The last 4 revelations I've listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011).

    What is it with science and religion?eligion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until bothccept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they allmost of them) meat at one common and single point: Everything was/is created by A CREATOR !any religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do notount Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to endt least Islam's holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isn't being read, preferably burned (by otherligious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist).cience itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventualformation of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is thetention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems.he Quran:

    rom the point of the Quran, there's no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able tobserve. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interprete revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action asng as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but,ou can't be aware of the right intentions unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need tochieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, it's (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: Read!:

    Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 1/2 - Phenomenons2

    http://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdfhttp://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdf
  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    5/6

    -ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons2utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

    6:0 In the name of God, the Gracious, the Compassionate.6:1 Read in the name of your Lord who has created.6:2 He created the human being from an embryo.6:3 Read, and your Lord is the Generous One.6:4 The One who taught by the pen.6:5 He taught the human being what he did not know.

    hich scientist could say anything controversial to these verses? In which rationality does it not fit? None! But theoint is, many of them are not even aware of it because they didn't read it... They kept their distance, to not beingeen as fools by the public. They take care merely of what people would say, than of what the truth really may ber is. I see it as a kind of intentional purpose of science, denying revelations, so that we all get stuck on thisanet and do not mature (science calls it evolution) into what we were (intelligently) designed for.

    Will you not consider, will you not acknowledge ?Where you see randomness and uncertainty, I see intention and purpose.Where you see evolution and mutation, I see maturing and evaluation.ou call it evolution with a huge source of billion years, whereas you can't be sure if it is what it looks.

    Where you see explosion and expansion, I see creation and orbiting.or you it may have no sense at all, for me it is to sense itself.

    Where you are copying and repeating mindless, without using own intellect;

    believe, have faith and use intellect to read and understand what is given.We all observing the same, it is the question of: What we want to see, what we want it to be.ou fear what it could be, I do not and know that it is with purpose and intention.ou fear death, I do not. I hope to achieve the knowledge useful after death.ou don't believe in hereafter, stuck into the material world and all that matters is matter.o way to convince you of things you can't sense. Your unused intellect won't help you to understand what isense.ou keep digging into matter spending billions in search of God/-s, unaware or denying of: There is no God/-s.ou know that it needs a Creator to set up a whole universe, but can't accept that you are helpless, hoping forelp of the God/-s.ou are not reading nor accepting truth spoken words, but senseless words of the created, you like them much.ou call it rational and science without knowing the meaning of the words, that what you think is the truth will

    ave you an orphan and alone.ou fear to fail in a limited life, but don't fear a life in the dark or fire of eternal.ou are not aware of the ancients life told to you so you may consider, but wherever you can you repeat theiritter.ou don't want to consider and not acknowledge the truth, all you've needed has come and gone with your faith.ou call it a tale where there might be a truth, call it a truth where and whenever you can not proof.aith you say is ignorance and nonsense, don't you consider the senseless fabricated by yourself ?

    Will you not acknowledge at least consider after reading this stuff, how can you hope that one day you'll find theuth ?ou think you are thinking and haven't really done yet...ut wherever one says: I think, so I am. your applause is with them.

    23.05.2011, Monday 11:00) *If you think this is a poem, you are wrong! It is indeed not...24.05.2011, Tuesday 13:51) **It is a truly shocking circumstance to see, how unaware or intentionallynorant the western world is and behave, if it comes to knowledge (information that eventually is right) thatas it's source in the Quran. The Quran is being rigorously ignored, whereas any other, even the simplest mysticligion, is being elaborated with and in every single detail. But there is hope that one day every single human

    hall at least read the Quran once, because we can see that it is not just ignored anymore; People trying (andaving success) to burn it. I can't understand a mind burning a script just because it is from another religion, butwill have the effect that it is not a subject of unawareness and ignorance anymore, no more. If there must beared something than it must be this. And yes, in this case we can say, that the Quran, as an (eventually)timate and final revelation of A CREATOR, must be the ultimate truth, otherwise it would not have been soindly ignored and hatred. It is very obvious that the information and knowledge it is carrying could be of use oneay, for those who haven't read it yet. This leads me (and should you too) to some conclusions I have to come upith, what actually is happening on this world. My conclusions would not interest anyone neither do I want to beisunderstood (although it won't bother me...), as was the Quran. So I better keep my conclusions for myself.

    ut, what I had the chance of summarizing for myself, shall not be in vain hopefully. One day it may helpnderstanding the human mind better. For now, it is just a question of stubbornness beliefs, that may change anyme...Updated 23.05.2011

    * Updated 24.05.2011ook out for Phenomenons 3 !

    Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 2/2 - Phenomenons2

  • 8/6/2019 Phenomenons All

    6/6

    -ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons3utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

    DF7.05.2011, Cuma 12:21akale: Phenomenons3azan : Hakan OK

    Phenomenons 3

    27.05.2011, Friday 12:21)HE POINT:he point is one asking him-/herself: What if...?. This writing wasn't about getting into polemics about science,elief, faith, religion, philosophy and stuff like that, neither is or was any of my writings. It was and still is, aboutonsidering the point that even glorified science and the way it is fabricated and/or sensed today, could be somend of very well setup daydreaming, a dogmatic blind believe into things we are yet unable to explain. It is not auestion of proof or falsifying any theory, neither belief, faith, religion, etc. Just ask yourself: What if I gotverything wrong ?, no matter on which side your staying. Just: What if ?.made a lot of discussion about this matter/topics on LinkedIn.com in groups like History & Philosophy ofcience and Quantum Physics. What made me scary and fear to go on discussing was the truth that nobody ine groups really seem to be interested in looking into alternatives or a possbility of something different, but

    anging onto the usual explanations (habits), no matter how foolish they may have sound and eventually they

    re. Finally I ceased to post further and stopped membership of groups and the LinkedIn itself, because it wasetting a real pain in the a... trying to explain over and over again things that can not be understood (I finallyalized) by such a blindly group of people that put their whole faith into a (self made) thing called science whichey obviously do not really understand themselves at all. Shortly I can say that I've finally gave up on them.

    here's really nothing I can do, but feeling pity for all those people who couldn't see any truth, even if it wereaying in front of them. The days when I was trying to convince, are over now and everything that is left isilence. I will remain silent until the day, when everybody opens up their minds to something beyond materialism

    nd matter itself. Hopefully a day, not to far and not when it is to late to change the mind. (12:48)

    Son Deiiklik: 27 05 11 - 12:58:37 | Sayfa 1/1 - Phenomenons3

    http://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons3.pdfhttp://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons3.pdf