PhD Dissertation Defense

46
Modeling the Modeling the Percussion Response of Percussion Response of Laminated Materials Laminated Materials and Glass Columns and Glass Columns through the use of through the use of Computational Methods Computational Methods Ian Nieves Ian Nieves

description

Presentation used for Ian Nieves dissertation. It summarizes using FEA simulation to model impact mechanics and damping in a novel materials characterization device, and in biomedical materials designed to promote bone regeneration.

Transcript of PhD Dissertation Defense

Page 1: PhD Dissertation Defense

Modeling the Percussion Modeling the Percussion Response of Laminated Response of Laminated

Materials and Glass Columns Materials and Glass Columns through the use of through the use of

Computational MethodsComputational Methods

Ian NievesIan Nieves

Page 2: PhD Dissertation Defense

ObjectivesObjectives• Damping and PercussionDamping and Percussion• PeriometerPeriometer• Modeling with Finite Element Modeling with Finite Element

Analysis (FEA)Analysis (FEA)• Modeling Periometer TestingModeling Periometer TestingLaminated Materials - DampingLaminated Materials - DampingGlass Columns - DefectsGlass Columns - Defects

Page 3: PhD Dissertation Defense

DampingDamping• Energy dissipation during mechanical actionEnergy dissipation during mechanical action• Intrinsic dampingIntrinsic damping: energy thermally : energy thermally

dissipated through microstructural changesdissipated through microstructural changes• Damping a function of material structureDamping a function of material structure

U

D

2 tan

'

"

E

E

Page 4: PhD Dissertation Defense

Intrinsic Damping and Tissue Intrinsic Damping and Tissue RegenerationRegeneration

• Dominant paradigm of bone maintenance (Mechanostat) = skeletal remodeling and repair mediated by damping + dynamic stresses

• Clinical studies implement damping in prosthetics integration2

22James C. Earthman, Cherilyn Sheets, J. Paquete, et al, Tissue EngineeringJames C. Earthman, Cherilyn Sheets, J. Paquete, et al, Tissue Engineering in Dentistry, in Dentistry, Clin. Plastic Surg.Clin. Plastic Surg., Vol. 30, pp. 621 – 639, 2003, Vol. 30, pp. 621 – 639, 2003

22James C. Earthman, Cherilyn Sheets, J. Paquete, et al, Tissue EngineeringJames C. Earthman, Cherilyn Sheets, J. Paquete, et al, Tissue Engineering in Dentistry, in Dentistry, Clin. Plastic Surg.Clin. Plastic Surg., Vol. 30, pp. 621 – 639, 2003, Vol. 30, pp. 621 – 639, 2003

Page 5: PhD Dissertation Defense

PercussionPercussion

• Generate mechanical pulses through impactGenerate mechanical pulses through impact• Pulse parameters (intensity, duration, etc.) Pulse parameters (intensity, duration, etc.)

modified in situ through dampingmodified in situ through damping• Pulsate mechanics similar to biological Pulsate mechanics similar to biological

activities (Running, etc.)activities (Running, etc.)

*Bakos et al., Acta Veterinaria Hungarica (2003).

Page 6: PhD Dissertation Defense

PeriometerPeriometerWorkstation with Workstation with

Virtual Virtual

InstrumentationInstrumentation

Percussion Percussion ProbeProbe

Control Control InstrumentInstrumentation and ation and SensorsSensors

Page 7: PhD Dissertation Defense

PeriometerPeriometer

Page 8: PhD Dissertation Defense

Calculation of Force and Calculation of Force and AccelerationAcceleration

fivvmKE 22

2

1

UCUER

22

maF

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

En

erg

y R

etu

rn (

erg

s)E

ner

gy

Ret

urn

(e

rgs)

Time (ms)Time (ms)

Energy Return = Energy Return = ERER = = CC11 xx FF2 2

Page 9: PhD Dissertation Defense

Periometer Wave DynamicsPeriometer Wave Dynamics

Page 10: PhD Dissertation Defense

DEFECT DETECTIONDEFECT DETECTION

Page 11: PhD Dissertation Defense

Modeling Percussion Modeling Percussion

• Validate percussion responseValidate percussion response• Elucidate mechanisms underlying Elucidate mechanisms underlying

responseresponse• Predict facets of percussion profilePredict facets of percussion profile• Taylor and refine detection capabilitiesTaylor and refine detection capabilities• Facilitate construction of “Percussion Facilitate construction of “Percussion

Spectrum”Spectrum”

Page 12: PhD Dissertation Defense

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Creates representations of geometry Creates representations of geometry Uses geometry as template for network (mesh) Uses geometry as template for network (mesh)

of discrete lattice points (nodes)of discrete lattice points (nodes) Nodes are vertices for line, planar or polyhedral Nodes are vertices for line, planar or polyhedral

elementselements Uses Shape Functions to solve to produce Uses Shape Functions to solve to produce

predictions of nodal (acceleration, displacement) predictions of nodal (acceleration, displacement) and elemental (stress) results in response to and elemental (stress) results in response to inputs (initial and boundary conditions)inputs (initial and boundary conditions)

Page 13: PhD Dissertation Defense

ElementsElements

Idealized Hexagonal element used forIdealized Hexagonal element used for virgin testing materials and full-scalevirgin testing materials and full-scale

Hexagonal elements in cylindrical Hexagonal elements in cylindrical probe with nodes adjacent to probe with nodes adjacent to accelerometeraccelerometer

Page 14: PhD Dissertation Defense

Dytran vs. Dytran vs. MARCMARC• Dytran specialized for Dytran specialized for

ballistic modelingballistic modeling – – more more detailed resultsdetailed results

• Explicit solver – Explicit solver – ∆t∆tCritCrit automatically calculatedautomatically calculated

• DYMAT 24 Piecewise Linear DYMAT 24 Piecewise Linear Plasticity (elastoplastic) Plasticity (elastoplastic) material modelmaterial model

• Matrig rigid material model Matrig rigid material model – only requires mass input– only requires mass input

• MARC capable of ballistic MARC capable of ballistic modeling, specialized for modeling, specialized for elastomeric analysiselastomeric analysis

• Implicit Solver - Implicit Solver - ∆t∆tCritCrit calculated through calculated through inspectioninspection

• Elastic Material modelElastic Material model• Rayleigh damping model Rayleigh damping model

– intrinsic damping input– intrinsic damping input

DytranDytran MARCMARC

Page 15: PhD Dissertation Defense

Stepped Probe Stepped Probe ConstructionConstruction

Page 16: PhD Dissertation Defense

Rigid Probe and Glass Column Construction

Page 17: PhD Dissertation Defense

MeshesMeshes

Page 18: PhD Dissertation Defense

Boundary Conditions for Boundary Conditions for Laminated MaterialsLaminated Materials

Page 19: PhD Dissertation Defense

Initial and Boundary Conditions Initial and Boundary Conditions for Rigid Probe and Glass Columnsfor Rigid Probe and Glass Columns

Page 20: PhD Dissertation Defense

Material ParametersMaterial ParametersMaterial

Model Material E (KPa) ρ (kg/mm3) ν σys (KPa) Code

DYMAT 24

Steel 1.93108 8.00x10-6 0.30 4.40x104

Dytran

Al 6061 7.00x107 2.70x10-6 0.35 3.95x105

PTFE 5.00x105 2.10x10-6 0.40 9.00x104

Glass 7.03x107 2.47x10-6 0.22 6.90x104

PMMA 3.30x106 1.19x10-6 0.37 1.07x105

PLGA 3.50x106 1.19x10-6 0.40 4.4x104

Elastic

Steel 1.93108 8.00x10-6 0.30

MARC

Al 6061 7.00x107 2.70x10-6 0.35

PTFE 5.00x105 2.10x10-6 0.40

Glass 7.03x107 2.47x10-6 0.22

PMMA 3.30x106 1.19x10-6 0.37

PLGA 3.50x106 1.19x10-6 0.40

Page 21: PhD Dissertation Defense

Intrinsic Damping in MARCIntrinsic Damping in MARC

Material Al PTFE PMMA

η 0.0003 0.1038 0.0400

• Rayleigh Damping Function: C = αM + (β+gt)K, M Rayleigh Damping Function: C = αM + (β+gt)K, M = Mass Matrix, K = Stiffness Matrix, C = Damping = Mass Matrix, K = Stiffness Matrix, C = Damping MatrixMatrix

• Damping is proportional to stiffness and massDamping is proportional to stiffness and mass• Stiffness Matrix Factor(Stiffness Matrix Factor(β) = 2(η)/π(lowest modal β) = 2(η)/π(lowest modal

frequency(Hz))frequency(Hz))• η = Loss Coefficient η = Loss Coefficient • Modal frequency material specific, derived Modal frequency material specific, derived

through MARC modal analysisthrough MARC modal analysis

Page 22: PhD Dissertation Defense

Al MonolithsAl Monoliths

Page 23: PhD Dissertation Defense

3.175 mm thick Al Monolith: Results3.175 mm thick Al Monolith: Results

Stepped ProbeStepped Probe

Stepped Probe: MARCStepped Probe: MARC

Cylindrical Probe: DytranCylindrical Probe: Dytran

Cylindrical Probe:Cylindrical Probe: DytranDytran

Cylindrical Probe: MARCCylindrical Probe: MARC

Page 24: PhD Dissertation Defense

Size Effects: 500 x 500 x 3.175 mm Al Monolith Size Effects: 500 x 500 x 3.175 mm Al Monolith and 27 gram Probeand 27 gram Probe

k

mT

27 gram Probe27 gram Probe 500 mm x 500 mm x 3.175 mm Monolith500 mm x 500 mm x 3.175 mm Monolith

Page 25: PhD Dissertation Defense

Al – PTFE Scaffolds with Al – PTFE Scaffolds with Rigid ProbeRigid Probe

Page 26: PhD Dissertation Defense

Al – PTFE Scaffolds with Al – PTFE Scaffolds with Stepped Probe and Intrinsic Stepped Probe and Intrinsic

DampingDamping

Page 27: PhD Dissertation Defense

3.175 PTFE: 3.175 Al 3.175 PTFE: 3.175 Al 1.58 PTFE: 3.175 Al 1.58 PTFE: 3.175 Al

Page 28: PhD Dissertation Defense

PMMA Scaffold with Intrinsic PMMA Scaffold with Intrinsic DampingDamping

Scaffold and ProbeScaffold and Probe Layer with DefectLayer with Defect

Page 29: PhD Dissertation Defense

PMMA Scaffold with Intrinsic PMMA Scaffold with Intrinsic Damping: Origin of ShoulderDamping: Origin of Shoulder

Intrinsic DampingIntrinsic Damping No Intrinsic DampingNo Intrinsic Damping

Page 30: PhD Dissertation Defense

PLGA Scaffold: Mesh re-Enforcement and PLGA Scaffold: Mesh re-Enforcement and Stress AttenuationStress Attenuation

1J. Calvert, L. Weiss, New Frontiers in Bone Tissue Engineering, Clin. Plast. Surg., Vol. 30, pp. 641 – 648, 2003

• PLGA demonstrated to PLGA demonstrated to stimulate bone stimulate bone and vascular regenerationand vascular regeneration11

Re-enforcedRe-enforced

VirginVirgin

Page 31: PhD Dissertation Defense

Glass DefectGlass Defect

0.2 mm0.2 mm

Glass used to model rigid biological materials: Glass used to model rigid biological materials: bone, enamel, etc.bone, enamel, etc.

Page 32: PhD Dissertation Defense

Cylindrical Probe and Glass ControlCylindrical Probe and Glass Control

MARCMARC

DytranDytran

Page 33: PhD Dissertation Defense

Stepped Probe and Glass Control: Stepped Probe and Glass Control: Acceleration ResultsAcceleration Results

T ≈ 0.18 msecT ≈ 0.18 msec

T ≈ 0.25 msecT ≈ 0.25 msec

T ≈ 0.25 msecT ≈ 0.25 msec

MARCMARC

DytranDytran

Page 34: PhD Dissertation Defense

Rigid Probe and Glass ControlRigid Probe and Glass Control

Page 35: PhD Dissertation Defense

Stepped Probe and Trench DefectStepped Probe and Trench Defect

“T” ≈0.58 msec “T” ≈0.58 msec

Page 36: PhD Dissertation Defense

Trench Crack: Averaged Probe Trench Crack: Averaged Probe Acceleration (Dytran)Acceleration (Dytran)

Averaged Probe nodal Averaged Probe nodal accelerations accelerations for indicated planesfor indicated planes

Page 37: PhD Dissertation Defense

Wedge Crack GeometryWedge Crack Geometry

Shoulder Peak

Page 38: PhD Dissertation Defense

Shoulder Peak

Semi-Circular Aligned Crack: Semi-Circular Aligned Crack: AccelerationAcceleration

1 mmCross Section Cross Section PerpendicularPerpendicular

to Impact to Impact PlanePlane

Page 39: PhD Dissertation Defense

Crack Boundary EffectsCrack Boundary Effects

Page 40: PhD Dissertation Defense

Rigid Probe with 1 mm transverse Crack

Page 41: PhD Dissertation Defense

Glass Controls: FEA vs. PercussionY

– Ax

is A

ccel

erati

on (m

m/s

ecY

– Ax

is A

ccel

erati

on (m

m/s

ec22 )

Time (sec)Time (sec)

Glass control acceleration accurately modeled with stepped probe

Page 42: PhD Dissertation Defense

Cracked Glass : FEA vs. PercussionY

– Ax

is A

ccel

erati

on (m

m/s

ecY

– Ax

is A

ccel

erati

on (m

m/s

ec22 )

Y –

Axis

Acc

eler

ation

(mm

/sec

Y –

Axis

Acc

eler

ation

(mm

/sec

22 )

Y –

Axis

Acc

eler

ation

(mm

/sec

Y –

Axis

Acc

eler

ation

(mm

/sec

22 )Time (sec)Time (sec) Time (sec)Time (sec)

Time (sec)Time (sec)

Page 43: PhD Dissertation Defense

Crack Stresses (KPa)

Semi-circular crack with Semi-circular crack with square edgesquare edge

Semi-circular

crack with

round edge

Wedge-form Wedge-form crack crack

with round with round edgeedge

Page 44: PhD Dissertation Defense

Interference EffectsInterference Effects

Page 45: PhD Dissertation Defense

Summary• FEA can elucidate mechanical origin of probe signalsFEA can elucidate mechanical origin of probe signals• FEA – based modeling can accurately model defect detection in rigid FEA – based modeling can accurately model defect detection in rigid

materialsmaterials• FEA can qualitatively evaluate energy dissipation in biomedical scaffoldsFEA can qualitatively evaluate energy dissipation in biomedical scaffolds• Modeling indicates dependence of Periometer function on interference Modeling indicates dependence of Periometer function on interference

effectseffects• Further modeling – experimental is required to refine intrinsic damping Further modeling – experimental is required to refine intrinsic damping

modelingmodeling

Page 46: PhD Dissertation Defense

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

• Dr. James Earthman• MSC Software Corporation,

Santa Ana, CA