Phased-Array Radars: Past, Astounding Breakthroughs and Future Trends

12
  I \  ^ COVER FE/]TURE: NOW INVITED PAPER PHASED-ARRAY  RADARS: PAST ASTOUNDING BREAKTHROUGHS  A N D FUTURE  TRENDS Phased-anmj  radars Juwe seen  ever  increasingly  wider  us e  around the wodd over the last five decades. In recent  years, they have  seen  breakthroughs that led  to  capabilities  n ot  possible  in  t he  past.  This is exemplified  by the  devehrpment  ofGaAs  integrated niicroivave circuits called monolithic  microwave integrated circuits  MMIC) that make it  pos.nble  to build  active electronically  scanned  arrays  AESA) that have  lighter  weight smaller  volume,  higher  reliability  and.  lower  cost.  These  developnwnts  liave  readied the point where it  i s  n o w  possible  to build  a  low-cosi  35 GHz phased airayfor  a  missile seeker costing  30/element (total cost  of array  including  al l  electronics  divided by the num ber of elements). This is made pos.sible because integration allows  the whole T/R module to be put  on  a  single  chip. For some  applications, it  w iU  soon  b e  possible  to put multiple  receivers  o r  transmitters  on a  single  chip. The  advances  provided by Moore's  L aw have now made it feasible to do  digital  beam forming with  a ll  its nmnerous  advantages.  This article describes these advances  a n d  also covers  the potential for GaN an d SiC chips that have the capability of higher  peak  power by  a  factor often than  G<iAs  chips, arrays with  instantanecms  bandwidths of up to  33:1 SiGe  low-cost  T/R  modules  a n d  low-cost  MEMS arrays. A  real radar  application for  multiple- input multiple-output MIMO)  Im s  been  demonstrated by MITs Lincoln Laboratonj, which  allows  tlie colierent  comlnning of two  radars  to  achieve  a9dB  increase  i n  sensitivity.  MIMO  also makes possihle  th e optimum  removal  of clutter  in  over the horizon OTH) and  airborne radars  by permitting adaptive  control of the transmit antenna pattern in the receiver O ve r  the last five decades since the fonna- tion of tlie  Microwave  Journal phiiscd- anay radars have seen renuirkahle a( - vaiices ainl wide proliferation around tlie woild. This is exemp lifi ed in  Figures  I 2  an d  3 which give just a few examples oi the phased airays de- ployed over the last 50 years and under develop- 3 merit in recent years. Back in 1957 there jnst a few iirray radai's. John Aliens article, "Ar- ray Radars: A Survey of Their Potential and Th eir Limitations."^' first published in  M i- E L I  BliOOKNLIi Life Fellotc  I MICROW.WE JOURNAL • JANUARY 200S

description

Phased-array radars: Past, astounding breakthroughs and future trends

Transcript of Phased-Array Radars: Past, Astounding Breakthroughs and Future Trends

  • r,I \ ^ ''' COVER FE/]TURE: NOW

    INVITED PAPER

    PHASED-ARRAY RADARS:PAST, ASTOUNDINGBREAKTHROUGHS ANDFUTURE TRENDS

    Phased-anmj radars Juwe seen ever increasingly wider use around the wodd over the last five decades. Inrecent years, they have seen breakthroughs that led to capabilities not possible in the past. This isexemplified by the devehrpment ofGaAs integrated niicroivave circuits called monolithic microwaveintegrated circuits (MMIC) that make it pos.nble to build active electronically scanned arrays (AESA) thathave lighter weight, smaller volume, higher reliability and. lower cost. These developnwnts liave readied thepoint where it is now possible to build a low-cosi 35 GHz phased airayfor a missile seeker costing$30/element (total cost of array including all electronics divided by the number of elements). This is madepos.sible because integration allows the whole T/R module to be put on a single chip. For some applications,it wiU soon be possible to put multiple receivers or transmitters on a single chip. The advances provided byMoore's Law have now made it feasible to do digital beam forming with all its nmnerous advantages. Thisarticle describes these advances and also covers the potential for GaN and SiC chips that have thecapability of higher peak power by a factor often than G

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    Fig. 1 Example luhe (T) and salkl'ntate (SS)ssiff plitiscd arrays having large

    h

    GRUNMMI e^DHAWKEYE

    RAT31DL

    APG-63

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    SHUTTLERADARTOTOGRAPHMISSION(SRTCISIR

    /'Vg. .3 Other phused arraif siisivmHdeveloped or ttnder development.

    vd (see Figure 6).2 DARPA alsohindt 'd (lt'\('l(}pin('nl of;! $10 X-l)aii[l, 10 iiiW. siiiule-cliip T/R niocl-ule.^ A 76 CM/, photOL-tclifd Hdtnumlens arra)' costing only a few dollarsWHS de\el()pe(l inr aiitoniotixi' cruise

    l'

    TABLE IBREAKTHROUGHS

    Ffiased iirniy.s i'\

    (SBX) nidur35 ( ; M / $19 K active pluiscd anny L()w-C(wl MKMS ])lia.sd

    GaN.SiCSiGt', CMOS

    Digila! bcaiiil'oriiiingk and iisscinlily

    M!M

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    45,056 Best-of Breed Tranimit/Receiver modulci

    * 128 modules per lubarray(352 tubarrayi total)

    Time-delay steering at thesubarray level tupportswideband waveformi

    * Nine luper-iubarrays - ctockodto tuppreif grating lobe

    '> Xnii (iniiii (iirhUcrtiiri-.

    Sure, we sell lots of microwaveand millimeter-wave components.But, let's face it, sometimes you'renot looking for just a component,you're looking to create an entiresystem. Come to us for thecomplete solution. Give usa call and talk to one of ourengineers. Together we'lldesign the system thatexactly meets your needs.

    ReceiversTransceivers/TransmittersSwitcii MatricesBlock ConvertersRadar SubsystemsCoherent Converters i iCommunication Systems ;Integrated Amplifiiar Ass

    LOW-CO5T MEMS PHASED ARRAYIf only we had a low loss pliiLse sliirter. Then we ooultl go

    back to the passive-architecture electronically scannedphased array with one mociule feeding many phase shifters(10, for example). This could potentially reduce the eost ol'iUi electronically scanned pluised array by a factor of aboutten. Micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) offer thispromise. MEMS s\vitches have improved their reliability- bythree orders of magnitiide over what was reported in Octo-ber 2003'' to a life of 6(X) billion switches.-^ -^ There is stillneed for improvement in the loss. The loss through a fonr-bit phase shifter nsed in a 1-D scanned radonie antenna^ ^ ^ ^ ^ space-fed lens (RADANT) is -1.25

    dB. Two lenses are needed for a 2-Dscan so tliat the two-way loss for a 2-Dscanned RADANT array would be ~5clB. but proi^ress is being made.*''

    GaN AND SiC CHIPSWide bandgap GaN and SiC

    MMIC chips offer the potential ofone to two orders inciease in T/Rmodule power (see Figure 7).2"Table 2 summarizes the major ad-vantages of GaN. Tables 3 and 4compare GaN with Gay\s. This tech-nology would make it possible to up-grade an existing AESA by replacingthe GaAs T/R modules with GaN orSiC T/R modules having ten timesthe power. This provides either a tentimes improvement in search volnme

    Raytheon Buirt SI9KSeeker Array; -600 EL-$30/EL, -40mW/EL

    l-'iii. 0 Su luw-cust \)fuised iiiratj-miltrue anymore.

    10'to*

    Ito*

    Kiymofu

    Twn

    dubMBKT ;

    SOUDIMTE

    \

    \

    VACUUM

    WOTRONJ

    ElECTRONlAua

    IMMTT

    1 10 100FREQUENCY (GHiJ

    A Fig. 7 Stute~()J-tlir-(in siiikl-ataic andtube devices.

    36 Visit http://mw).hotlms.coin/16337-128 MICROWAVE JOURNAL JANUARY 200S

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    or a 78 percent increase iti trackrange.^ '** CREE provides commercialSiC hybrid devices putting out 10 to60 W'for lip to 4 GHz luul GaN liy-hrid de\ices putting (iiit 15 to 120 Wfrom UHF to 40 GHz.'f^ Their goal isto provide in one package 550 Wpeak and 30 to 40 W average linearpower output using a single-stageFET. CREE supports the design ofMMIC SiC and GaN cliips. For GaNMMIC tliey provide 60 W saturated

    from 2.5 to 4 GHz and 25 W saturat-ed from 5 to 6 GHz. See References16-18 for detailed siin'ex'S of state-of-the-art on GaN and SiG.'SiGe CHIPS

    SiGe has tlie advantage of using Sias a su})strate. the te'chnolog\' of thelow-cost, commercial integrated-cir-cuit industry and whose exten.sive re-sources can be drawn upon. It offersthe potential of liiglier performance

    egraTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    TMP Rr PULSED POWER LEADER!

    Integra's Miniaturized Power Amplifier (MPA) devices arecompletely impedance matched to 50 ohms internal to thepackage. The MPAL series utilizes gold metali2ed siliconLDMOS technology. They are characterized for simple pulsedoperation (lOOus, 10%) with low and constant quiescent current.They are capable of operating under other pulsed operationalmodes and under other classes of bias.

    2.7 - 3.1 GHz and 3.0 3.5 GHz frequency bandsFlexible class of operation: AB, B or AFlexible pulsed operational modes

    Integra Technologies, Inc. 321 Coral Circle El Segundo, CA 902454620Telephone: (310) 606-0855 Fax:(310)606-0865

    Copyr>glit 2007 All Righls Reserved ^."^

    w w w . i n t e g r a t e c h . c o m ' ^ ^

    at low cost. SiGe does not competewith GaAs with respect to microwa\eoutput power or noise figure. It offerslow cost and the ability to integratemany functions on a single chip. Inaddition to microwave power ampli-fiers and a low-noise figure receiveron one chip, it can have A/Ds anddigital circuitry. It can have CMOSon the same chip. Si CMOS. GTRI is

    TABLE IIGaN TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGES

    GaN lias the highest [xnu'r dciisih nlaiivexisting tec'hin)!og\' enahlcs retiiEL-cil chip size - IDWI.T cost

    tor a given power sni;il!er FET size enables broader

    bantlwjdth because of higher impeditnceGaN capable nf higber operating voltage

    jn power systemGaN on SiC ha.s icondiicti\'ity eonipared inaiiitain moderate efiiiiiriel ternps ;U high

    TABLE IIIADVANTAGES OF MMIC GaN

    OVER GaAi MMIC Provides .sy.steiii adMinlages re: weiglil,

    coLiliiig. priiTie [lower, enst. sensitiviU', range 2H V vs. 10 Vat ix current (I) provides

    5- Wx power witli - same gainiuid elik'ieniy as C.nAs

    Iligl) voltage Ga/\s Pl'lEMT al 10 t(} 20 Vlit lower [ pro\ides only ] .5 to 2x power.

    CiiiN iu Hit)

    - 1

    47 390(Z)/490 (SiC)(WViii-K)

    38 Visit http://niwj.hotims.coni/16337-65 MrCROWA\T. JOrRNAI. JANl ABY 200S

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    CMOS CHIPSCMOS now operates at microwave

    Ireqiiencies. It. too, uses a silicon suh-strate and is the technology widely usedill the coinputtT iuthistrv. It Imlils thfpromise of low cost and low powei' (orthe receiver parts of T/R modules. LikeSiCe. it lias tlie advantage of allowinjjthe integration of many functions on asiujrle chip, even more so than SiGf.One ciiip can have RF, IF, haseljand.microprocessor, memory, tunable filtersand A/Ds a .system on'a chip (SOC). Ittan be c()ini)inetl with CaAs or GaN forthe microwave power amplifier and lownoise flpue receiver. Using CaN has thead\antage oi beintj robn.st euon^h that alimitrr may not be needed. Si to,tietlifrwith CMOS offers the possibility- of theintegration of many receive and/or tran.s-mit channels on a single chip.

    DIGITAL BEAM FORMING (DBF)DBF hiLs am\ecl lor microwave .AESA radars (see Figure

    8). It provides many sipiificant advantages over anulojf hramfomiing.' For large arrays I used to say DBF Is only being

    DBF: Formt J beamipointing at jammerand one dt target

    SLCOUTPUT

    i) Addplivc-adaplive array (Brookner and Howell, Pro(\

    developing a SiCk' single-chip T/R module for use in an.\I*;S.A radar. Its initial design had a peak power of > 50inW using a nvo-stage power amplifier (PA). Work is un-der way to achieve 1 W peak by usingthree stages.'^ The cost per element ofan .AES.A using such a module is expect-('

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    done at subarniy. This is no longer tnie.l-llta II;LS doiH' it at thr element level tora 2.'5(X)-eIeinent iirray at S-band, a nia-jor lireakthroitgh. Using DBF elimi-nates the analog coinhinin

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    lobe. It is to adjust ndaptively the uin-plitiule aiul pliase weisfhts of the arraySO as to put nulls in the directions oi"the jammers while maintaining themain l)eam poiutin;[;in the reijuirt-d di-rection. The.se amplitude and phaseweight adjustmeuts iire made hitscd onthe jamming sigiKiIs recei\'eil b)' the ai'-ray and tlieir ciJcnlated direction. Thissv'stem is kuouii as a luJly atlaptive ar-ra)' processor". Here again it is useiul ttjview tlie fully adaptive array froni an-

    other physical point of \iew. Just as pre-viously we viewed the SLX" as an arrav'that puts nulls in die direction of thejanuners. we can now go the other wayand \ie\v the (ully adaptive arrayprocessor iw a SLC.^'"

    Fidiy adaptive arrays have beentoo (lifficiilt to implement for largearrays up to uow. the luirdv\'iu-e andtile processing load being too great,To reduce the complexity, eonsidera-tion lias been given to doing fully

    44 Visit http://mwj. hotims.com/16337-53

    adaptive arniv proce.ssing at the sub-array level. This reduces the numberoi elements from thousantis to a fewtens. This is what is done on theUK's Multi-fuiictiou p]lectronit;LlIyScainied Adaptive Hatlar (MESAIi)."

    Witli ttie advaueti-s of DBF, it is nowpossible to think ol aehieving the per-formance ot fully adaptive proci'ssiugwithout its couiplexity. In fact, tlieequiviJent jammer suppressi(jn of a ful-ly adaptive array without its computa-tion and transient penalties can heachieved. This can be accomplishedwith adaptive-adaptive array pnK*ess-irig.' This involves no more than Itx-at-ing digitally where the jamnu'rs are.then ]K)intiug lieains at tliesc jainiucrs(these beams are effectively eigen-l)eams)^-'"-"* luid using these lu-iims asside lobe cancellers for the uiaiu beam(see Figure 9). For a U)(K)-cleuit'iit ar-ra\' having to cope with 10 jammers, wenow have to invert a 10 x 10 matrix in-stead of a KXX) X KXK) niatiix and thetransient time is reduced iiy a factor ot100. lu a elas.siciJ full)' adaptive arra),one does not make use of" tlie loctitionof the jammers. But we can eiLsily de-termine their hjcation rather than toput on biiudei's. Tliis method i.s e(julva-leut to the method of Principal C o^tnjx)-nents.^ The jammers c;ui easily be lo-cated by doing a Fast Fourier Trans-form aeross [he array This vvil[ notlocate jammers less tliaii a Ix^anivvidthapart, but fbr uiany applications it maybe g(K)d enough. If lietter jamuier VAU-ci'llation is needed, then two stjuintedbeiuns about .'3/4 of a beamvvitlth apartcan be used fbr each located jammer.Tliis is betmise for closely spaci'd jam-mers, less tlian a beamvvidth apart, liteeigen}>eams are sum and differencebeams."' Alternately the Music algo-ritlim can be used.''^ Adaptive-adaptiveanay pnx-essing is in the .same spirit iH.sthe knowledge aided techniquesDAHPA has been recently fundingknown as Knowledge Aided SensorSignal Processor & Expert System(K.\SSPFR).^^ which they have appliedto Space-time Adaptive Proces.siug(STAP) discussed in the next section.

    STAPSTAP is adaptive-an ay proee.s.siiip;

    of a piil.se Doppler vvavefbrui. It pro-vides adaptive nulling of ground clut-ter and jammers on a moving plat-(oriu. On a ino\ing platfbrui it placesa 2-D Doppler-angle null where the

    MICBOWAVE JOURNAL JANUARY 2008

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    cluttfv is.^ STAP is being used on thenew carrier-based E2-D AdvancedHawkeyes AN/APY-9 radar sliown inFignre l.'^ ^ It is used in tlie littoralLTivironnifint.'''^ It can also be nsed tocancel ont ground clutter tor agiound-based pulse Doppler radar.^'

    PACKAGING AND ASSEMBLYIt is now possible to package and

    assemble active pbascd arrays havinglow cost, li"hf weitiiit and small \-ol-

    nnie. The technique involves the useof coinniercial printed wiring boards(PCB) and no packages for indi\idnalT/R modules. An X-band building-block ana\' of" 128 elements and T/Rmodules was built having a size of" 7.4X 10.1 X 0.21 in.2

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    to 18 GHz.3>-i'' The Georgia TeclinicalKesearch Institute {GTRI) is devel-oping an urniy luiviniT; 33:1 instantii-nt'Oii.s haiKKvicltli witli potential oi100: l.'^ "^TUBE ADVANCEMENTS

    Tubes arc niakijig major ad-\ances. '- ' '-^ 2 Tlu' a\'ailaliilily ofpovv-orful software now allows tlie designt()ber20

  • COVER FEATURE: NOW

    l.T. G.J. Frazer, Y.I. Ahraniii\ilc-li and B.A. 24.Joliiison, "Spatially Wavcrorni DiverseUadar: Pcrspct-tives lor Ilifih Fre(]iient:y 2.5.OTIIH." 0(17 lERR Radar Conferenoe,April 17-20. 2(XI7. Boston. MA. 26.

    l(i. Vlilligmi, cl ;J., HnilarC'.on-2007.17. Kopp,/Wi3S. (. :TH1. Hoiiziw Magazine. 2()6.39. Machine Design. Maaii 22. 2007.40. R..^ , Moiiziiigo and T.W. Miller. Inlnxluc-

    tion to Adaptive .-\rrr/(/.v. Jolin Wiley &Sons Inc.. I9SII.

    41. M.f:. WVlls. "MK.SAH Arlapliv.- Nnlllng,"lEECiilloijuinni. jnm-, 1990.

    42. J. (iiifiri and J. Hrrpn. "Military- Hadar,"Jiinf 2.5-27. 2(X)7.

    43. K. Tmt and li. Cnnirninjf.s. ct al.. Inti'nia-liorial SynipcKsinni iiri Pila.scd-array Sys-tems anrl Technology, OttobL-r 2003,Boston. MA.

    41. S. Brierle); Raj'thcon Co.Eli BrookfMr nv-rtiM't/ ltl\tii:ii: '/-ij/.v fi-fi Til,' citiiC