Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

49
Jakob Bardram, Afsaneh Doryab , Rune M.Jensen, Poul M. Lange, Kristian L. G.Nielsen, and Soeren T. Petersen

description

Presentation of paper on the PerCom 2011 conference in Seattle.

Transcript of Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Page 1: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Jakob Bardram, Afsaneh Doryab, Rune M.Jensen, Poul M. Lange, Kristian L. G.Nielsen, and Soeren T. Petersen

Page 2: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Motivation•Field studies•Sensor platform•The experiment•The results•Discussion and Conclusion

Outline

Page 3: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Motivation

• Existing work has mainly focused on daily routines of an individual person in home or outdoor

Page 4: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

MOTIVATIONHospital work is collaborative which involves constant coordination and communication

Page 5: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

MOTIVATIONAutomatic recognition of surgical procedure can be used for:

•Coordination, communication and planning

•Patient safety

•Context-aware information management and retrieval

Page 6: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Motivation

How can we automatically recognize the phases of a surgery using sensors?

Page 7: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Motivation

How can we automatically recognize the phases of a surgery using sensors?

What should be sensed?

Page 8: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Motivation

How can we automatically recognize the phases of a surgery using sensors?

What should be sensed?Which sensors provide more significant input ?

Page 9: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

What clinicians do in a surgery?

How do they move around?

Field study

Page 10: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

4 important activity zones

Page 11: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Who is involved in a surgery?

Field study

Page 12: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Which tools and instruments they use?Where they use them?

Field study

Page 13: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Field study

• 97% of tasks involved at least one physical instrument and 78% involved several instruments

• Direct relation between physical instruments and physical tasks

Page 14: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Field study

• 97% of tasks involved at least one physical instrument and 78% involved several instruments

• Direct relation between physical instruments and physical tasks

Page 15: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Temporal and sequential procedure

Page 16: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Based on our detailed study, these parameters seemed important to track:

Page 17: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Based on our detailed study, these parameters seemed important to track:

•The location of clinicians and the patient

Page 18: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Based on our detailed study, these parameters seemed important to track:

•The location of clinicians and the patient

•The location of objects on different tables

Page 19: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Based on our detailed study, these parameters seemed important to track:

•The location of clinicians and the patient

•The location of objects on different tables

•The use of objects and instruments by clinicians

Page 20: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor platform - Hardware

Ubisense server

Platform server

Arduino hub

ArduinoArm-wrist object tracking

UbisensePerson-tracking

AlienShort-range- object tracking

TCP Serial

TCP

TCP

USB

XBee

IcodeShort-range- object tracking

Page 21: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

•Synchronize input from different sensors•store raw observations (one instance per second)

Sensor platform- Software

Page 22: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor platform – Feature vector

Page 23: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor Platform – Feature vector

Page 24: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

The Experiment

Page 25: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

The Experiment

Page 26: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

The Experiment

Page 27: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

The Experiment

Page 28: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.
Page 29: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.
Page 30: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis

Test the feasibility of the sensor platform

Page 31: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis

Test the feasibility of the sensor platformHow accurate phase recognition could be using sensed

data

Page 32: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis

Test the feasibility of the sensor platformHow accurate phase recognition could be using sensed

dataIdentify the impact of each sensor in achieving high

accuracy

Page 33: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

4 simulated operations – (4 datasets)Leave-one-out cross validationUsing decision trees for classification

Analysis - Phase Recognition

Page 34: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis - Decision tree

Page 35: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis – Initial Results

Page 36: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Analysis – Feature Set

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table zone

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone

Tube in anesthesia table zone

… time

0 1 0 … t1

0 1 1 … t2

0 1 1 … t3

. . . . .

. . . . .

1 1 0 … tn

Features

Feature Instances at time t1-tn

Page 37: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Results – Phase RecognitionLaryngoscope in anesthesia table zone

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone

Tube in anesthesia table zone

… time

0 1 0 … t1

0 1 1 … t2

0 1 1 … t3

. . . . .

. . . . .

1 1 0 … tn

Features

Feature Instances at time t1-tn

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table zone

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table zone- acc

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone- acc

Tube in anesthesia table zone

Tube in anesthesia table zone- acc

… time

0 0 1 1 0 0 … t1

0 0 1 2 1 1 … t2

0 0 1 3 1 2 … t3

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

1 10 1 13 0 2 … tn

Page 38: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Feature Processing

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table

zone

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone

Tube in anesthesia table zone

… time

0 1 0 … t1

0 1 1 … t2

0 1 1 … t3

. . . . .

. . . . .

1 1 0 … tn

Page 39: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Feature Processing

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table zone

laryngoscope in anesthesia table zone- accumulated

time

0 0 t1

1 1 t2

1 2 t3

0 2 t4

0 2 t5

1 3 t6

Laryngoscope in anesthesia table

zone

Anesthesia nurse in anesthesia machine zone

Tube in anesthesia table zone

… time

0 1 0 … t1

0 1 1 … t2

0 1 1 … t3

. . . . .

. . . . .

1 1 0 … tn

Page 40: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Results – Phase Recognition

With historical features

Without historical features

Page 41: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor Significance

Page 42: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor Significance

Ubisense only

Page 43: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Ubisense only

Tables+

wristband

Sensor Significance

Page 44: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Sensor Significance

Ubisense only

Tables+

Wristband

Wristbandsonly

Page 45: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Location important or not?Using palm based sensors in the OR?Using sensors or images?Classical machine learning enough?

Discussion

Page 46: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Conclusion

• Possible to achieve relatively high classification accuracy in phase recognition during surgical procedures using machine learning techniques

Page 47: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Conclusion

• Possible to achieve relatively high classification accuracy in phase recognition during surgical procedures using machine learning techniques

• The experiment hepled to analyze the weight and hence the importance of different sensors

Page 48: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Conclusion

• Possible to achieve relatively high classification accuracy in phase recognition during surgical procedures using machine learning techniques

• The experiment hepled to analyze the weight and hence the importance of different sensors

• Our study gives important input for further research in design of suitable sensors for the OR

Page 49: Phase Recognition during Surgical Procedures using Embedded and Body-worn Sensors.

Thank you