Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

36
Butterflies in the Valley Peter Rogers, CGA September 5, 2013

description

Peter Rogers, CGA at Leed Advisors Inc presents on Butterfly Transactions and Corporate Restructuring

Transcript of Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Page 1: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Butterflies in the Valley

Peter Rogers, CGA

September 5, 2013

Page 2: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Section 55 Overview

• Anti-avoidance provision to prevent capital gains stripping via tax free inter-corporate dividends

• Subsection 55(2):

– Re-characterizes otherwise tax free inter-corporate dividends into capital gains

– Deemed dividends on share redemptions deemed to be proceeds of disposition

Page 3: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

When Subsection 55(2) Applies

Applies when all four of the following conditions are met:

1. A dividend is received by a corporation resident in Canada;

2. The dividend is a taxable dividend as defined by 89(1);

3. The dividend is deductible 112(1), 112(2), or 138(6); and

4. Either of the following:

a) the purpose test, or

b) the results test

Page 4: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Four Exceptions to 55(2)

• “Part IV Tax”

• The “Safe Income”

• “Paragraph 55(3)(a) Related Person”

• “Paragraph 55(3)(b) Butterfly”

Page 5: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Safe Income

• For a dividend to qualify as paid from safe income it must reasonably be attributed to:

– income earned or realized,

– by any corporation,

– throughout the holding period of a share, and

– ending at the “safe income determination time”

Page 6: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Concept of Safe Income

Structure Sale

Mr. A

Holdco

ACo

$5,000 Safe Dividend

Section 85 Rollover

Holdco sells the shares of ACo for $20,000

Page 7: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3)(a) Related Persons

Special Rules

• For the purpose of 55(3)(a) “Unrelated Person” defined by 55(3.01)(a) to be a person not related to the dividend recipient

• 55(5)(e)(i) deems siblings not to be related

• 55(e)(iv) a person and a trust are not related unless the person is related to each beneficiary

Page 8: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Paragraph 55(3)(a) Related

Person Exception None of the five following conditions apply:

• Subparagraph 55(3)(a)(i)

A disposition of property to an unrelated person for proceeds of disposition less than fair market value

• Subparagraph 55(3)(a)(ii)

A significant increase in the direct interest in any corporation by an unrelated person. (Exception: Sale of shares at FMV)

Page 9: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Paragraph 55(3)(a) Related

Person Exception (cont’d) • Subparagraph 55(3)(a)(iii)

A disposition of shares of the dividend paying corporation to an unrelated person (also 10% attribution rule excluding shares of the dividend recipient)

• Subparagraph 55(3)(a)(iv)

A disposition of shares of the dividend recipient to an unrelated person after the dividend was received (also 10% attribution rule)

Page 10: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Paragraph 55(3)(a) Related

Person Exception (cont’d) • Subparagraph 55(3)(a)(v)

A significant increase in the total of all direct interests in the dividend paying corporation by unrelated persons

Page 11: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #1 - 55(3)(a)

Current Structure

Daughter Parent Son

Opco(CCPC)

PropertyFMV $2M

Proposal – Butterfly son’s interest to Sonco

50% NV Com

50% NV Com

100% V Pfd

Page 12: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #1 (cont’d)

Daughter Parent Son

Opco Sonco

50% NV Com

100% V Pfd

100% V Pfd

100% NV Com

Property FMV $1.5M

Property FMV $500K

Page 13: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #1 (cont’d)

Final Structure

Daughter Parent Son

Opco Sonco

• 55(3)(a) not applicable as conditions in 55(3)(a)(ii) and (v) are met

• Need to qualify as a 55(3)(b) Butterfly

100% NV Com

100% V Pfd

100% NV Com

Page 14: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #1 (cont’d)

Alternative Structure

Daughter Parent Son

Opco Sonco

PropertyFMV $1M

PropertyFMV $1M

• 55(3)(a) applies

100% NV Com

100% V Pfd

100% V Pfd

100% NV Com

Page 15: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #1 (cont’d)

Alternative Structure

55(4) Risk

• 55(4) deems persons not to be related if one of the main purposes of one or more transactions is to cause persons to be related to avoid 55(2)

Page 16: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 2

Current Structure

A

Holdco

Opco

InvestmentAssets

100%

FMV $1.5M

100%

FMV $1M

FMV $500K

Page 17: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 2 (cont’d)

Consider: Butterfly the Investment Assets to

Newco

17

A

Holdco

Opco

Newco

Pfd FMV/ACB = $500K

Com

Com

Investment assets

Page 18: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 2 (cont’d)

Consider: Butterfly the Investment Assets

to Newco

• 55(3)(a) does not apply if done in

contemplation of a sale of Opco

Page 19: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 3 - Basic Split-Up Butterfly

Current Structure

Facts:

1. A and B are unrelated

persons

2. Business 1 and 2 are

active businesses

3. Opco is a CCPC

A B

Opco

Business 1 Business 2

50% 50%

FMV $1M FMV $1M

Page 20: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 3 - Opco rolls assets to

Aco and Bco pursuant to Section 85

Opco

Aco Bco

$1M Business 1

$1M Business 2

Page 21: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 3 - Basic Split-Up

Butterfly Final Position

B

Business 2

A

Business 1

Aco Bco

100% 100%

Page 22: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 4 - Basic Spin-Off Butterfly

Current Structure

A B

Opco

Business 1 Business 2

50% 50%

FMV $1M FMV $1M

Page 23: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 4 - Basic Spin-Off Butterfly

Roll 50% of Opco Shares to Newco under

Section 85

50%

A

Opco

25% 25%

50%

B

Newco

50%

Page 24: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 4 - Basic Spin-Off Butterfly

Opco transfers assets of Business 2 to

Newco

B A

Opco Newco

$1M Business 1

$1M

Business 2

50% 50%

Page 25: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 4 - Basic Spin-Off Butterfly

Final Structure

BA

Opco Newco

Business 2Business 1

50% 50% 50% 50%

FMV $1M FMV $1M

Page 26: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3)(b) - Butterfly

• Maintain continuity of ownership (i.e. no cashing out)

• Pro-rata asset distribution test

Cash and new cash assets

Investment assets

Business assets

• Act is silent regarding liabilities

• Tax accounts ignored for the Pro-rata test

Page 27: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3)(b) - Butterfly

Pro-Rata Test – continued:

– Gross asset Butterfly

Liabilities allocated pro-rata

– Net asset Butterfly

Net liabilities against assets to which they most relate

Page 28: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Butterfly Rules

• 55(3.1)(a) pre-butterfly restrictions

• 55(3.1)(b) restrictions on shares of a DC & TC

• 55(3.1)(c) TC post butterfly restrictions

• 55(3.1)(d) DC post butterfly restrictions

Page 29: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3.1)(a) Butterfly Rules

Butterfly rules – paragraph 55(3)(b) & subsection 55(3.1)

1. Paragraph 55(3.1)(a). Denies the Butterfly Exemption if property becomes property of the DC in contemplation of a distribution with certain exceptions including:

– Related part transactions

– A sale of property at FMV for cash or non-convertible debt

Page 30: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3)(b) Butterfly Rules

Paragraph 55(3.1)(b) prohibits

• A specified shareholder from selling shares of a TC or DC to an unrelated person

• An acquisition of control of a DC otherwise than by a permitted transaction.

• Acquiring shares of a DC in contemplation of a butterfly other than by a permitted transaction or from a related person

– 55(3.2) provides special rules for the purposes of 55(3.1)(b)

Page 31: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

55(3)(c)&(d)Butterfly Rules

Paragraph 55(3.1)(c) and (d):

• 55(3.1)(c) denies the Butterfly Exemption to a dividend received by a TC where the TC disposes of distributed property to a person unrelated to the transferee corporation

• Subparagraph 55(3.1)(d) is a mirror provision to 55(3.1)(c) that applies to a DC

Page 32: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration # 5 - 55(3)(b)

Current Structure

Opco

Daughter Parent Son

US Subco

Bldg 1 Bldg 2

50% NV

Com

FMV $1.2M

100% V

Pfd

FMV $2.6M

50% NV

Com

FMV $1.2M

FMV $1M FMV $4M FMV $1M

Page 33: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Illustration #5 – 55(3)(b)

Daughter Parent Son

100% NV Com FMV

$366,500

(7.33%)

100%

Opco

Dtrco Sonco

US Subco

V pfd

NV Com

FMV

$833,500

(16.67%)

NV Com

FMV

$833,500

(16.67%)

NV Com FMV

$366,500

(7.33%)

100%

Page 34: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Daughter Parent Son

Opco

Dtrco Sonco

Building 1 Building 2

US Subco

100%

50%

NV Com

100%

V Pfd

50%

NV Com

100%

100%

Illustration # 5 - 55(3)(b)

Final Restructure

Page 35: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Butterfly Issues

• Circle RDTOH

• Share Valuation

• Provincial Sales Tax

• Property Transfer Tax

• Asset Valuation

• Part IV.ITax

• Part VI.I Tax

• 15(1) Benefit

• Debt Forgiveness

Page 36: Peter Rogers, CGA Sept 5, 2013 presentation

Typical Butterfly Split-Ups

• Investment holding companies

• Real estate

• Family farms

• Divisible business (i.e. geographical etc.)