Peter M. O’Neill, MSEE Chair, Ft. Collins Energy Board Chair, IEEE High Plains Section...
-
Upload
edith-stephens -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Peter M. O’Neill, MSEE Chair, Ft. Collins Energy Board Chair, IEEE High Plains Section...
Peter M. O'Neill 1
AN ENGINEER’S EDUCATION & MUSINGS ON MAKING PUBLIC ENERGY POLICY
Peter M. O’Neill, MSEEChair, Ft. Collins Energy BoardChair, IEEE High Plains Section
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 2
Outline
Introduction Fort Collins policies & energy consumption
Systems thinking Transportation fuels example
Making public policy Issues, roles, metrics Conservation stories
Promising trends & opportunities
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 4
My Background
Recently semiretired from 37 years as engineer in semiconductor industry.
Came of age during oil shocks & environmental awareness of 1970’s.
Long interest in energy conservation & alternative energy. Built 2 very efficient houses Avidly read & experiment
Trying to put enthusiasm & knowledge to wider use. In 3rd year on Ft. Collins Energy Board where I have led
5-year revision of municipal energy policy Trying to work in energy research or industry
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 5
Fort Collins Energy Board & Policy
Scope expanded from electric utility to all energy in 2011.
Nine members appointed by City Council. Advisory only, not judicial.
4/22/2015
Council needs visionary and innovation advice regarding the community’s energy future.
Peter M. O'Neill 6
Fort Collins Energy Policy Objectives
Reduce GHG emissions in proportion to energy’s share of these emissions
Reduce the emission of criteria pollutants Reduce the environmental damage caused by
energy extraction and production Maintain or improve the reliability of energy delivery Refine the role of our municipal utility in a changing
industry Retain more of our community’s energy
expenditures in the local economy Foster local economic opportunity in energy
efficiency, production, and operation
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 8
Climate Action Plan Process for 2015 revision
Upon staff proposal to aggressively revise goals, Council requested study
“What would it take”, not action plan
Committee of citizen stakeholders
First-ever modeling effort by Brendle Group, RMI
Adopted by City Council in March
GHG targets relative to year 2005:
20% reduction by 2020 80% reduction by 2030
2050 Net zero by 2050 Already down 5% in 2013
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 9
Fort Collins Energy Overview
2013 GHG Emission by Use
2013 GHG Emission by Fuel
2013 Energy Consumption
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 10
PRPA Electricity Sources
Coal75.3%
Hydro19.4%
Wind
4.9%
Gas0.2%
So-lar0.2%
2014 Energy
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 12
Transportation Fuels – Motivations
Gasoline & Diesel High energy density Fast fueling Traditional availability
Natural Gas Lower emissions New US sources
Battery Electric No emissions during use Much higher (3.3x)
conversion efficiency than combustion
Regenerative braking Creates mobility from
stationary primary energy source
Combustion/Electric Hybrid Use electric storage to
optimize combustion engine operation
Regenerative braking Hydrogen Fuel Cell
No emissions during use
High conversion efficiency
Can make hydrogen from any primary energy source
4/22/2015
Representative Cars
4/22/2015 Peter M. O'Neill 13
Vehicle Make Model Weight (lb)
Gasoline Honda Civic DX 2,692
Natural Gas Honda Civic GX 2,910
Hybrid gasoline/electric
Toyota Prius 3,042
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Honda Clarity 3,582
Plug Hybrid electric mode (15 mi/charge)
Toyota Plug Prius
3,165
Electric (100 mi/charge)
Nissan Leaf 3,500
Similar size cars in 2009.
Attraction of Transport Fuels – Tank to Wheel Analysis
4/22/2015 Peter M. O'Neill 14
Distance travelled from energy stored onboard.
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
tric
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric m
ode
Elec
tric
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Energy (MJ/km)
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
tric
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric m
ode
Elec
tric
020406080
100120140160180200
CO2 (g/km)
Full Story – Well to Wheel Analysis
4/22/2015 Peter M. O'Neill 15
Quite different!
Distance travelled from primary energy source.
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
tric
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric C
oal
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric G
CC
Elec
tric fro
m C
oal
Elec
tric fro
m G
CC0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Energy (MJ/km)
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
...
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric ..
.
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric...
Elec
tric fro
m C
oal
Elec
tric fro
m G
CC0
50
100
150
200
250CO2 (g/km)
Tank to Wheel / Well to Wheel
4/22/2015 Peter M. O'Neill 16
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
tric
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric C
oal
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric G
CC
Elec
tric fro
m C
oal
Elec
tric fro
m G
CC0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Energy (MJ/km)
Tank to Wheel
Well to Wheel
Gasoline
Natur
al g
as
Hybrid
gas
oline/
elec
tric
HFC fr
om G
CC
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric C
oal
Plug
hyb
rid e
lect
ric G
CC
Elec
tric fro
m C
oal
Elec
tric fro
m G
CC0
50
100
150
200
250
CO2 (gm/km) Tank to Wheel
Well to Wheel
Peter M. O'Neill 17
Systems Thinking – GHG Accounting
What is the system & its boundary? Production method
Emissions from production of energy within boundary Electric power plants, home furnaces, vehicles operated
within boundary Consumption method
Emissions from energy used to make what is consumed within boundary
Energy imported across boundary. But also ... Energy embodied in manufactured items, materials, food,
buildings brought across boundary for consumption within More sensitive to population growth – often ignored
Lots of opportunity to double count
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 19
Policies Interact
Municipal energy policy does not stand alone Climate Action Plan sets targets for GHG, not for:
Criteria pollutants: toxins, carcinogens, particulates Environmental damage from energy extraction &
production But most practical GHG strategies will reduce these.
Transportation inextricably linked to land use Land use patterns sets transport demand. Transport modes & availability enable land use
patterns.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 20
Policy Interactions (cont.)
Regional cooperation Don’t make policy in isolation Land use & building regulations can drive development to
neighboring towns Avoid policy benefits Exacerbate problems here with more VMT
Building codes Reaching limit of prescriptive approach Replace with modeling approach District heat/cool requires new shared infrastructure
Telecom Large energy consumption by customer premise
equipment usually not consideration by franchise agreements
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 21
Benefits & Restrictions From External Policies
Federal product regulations benefit municipal policy sometimes w/o local effort: Vehicle fuel economy standards Energy Star appliances – replacement
accelerated by local rebates Ban on incandescent light bulbs
Can’t affect some big things Price of carbon Accelerate product efficiency standards
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 22
Ability to Measure & Model Electricity consumption easy to measure with
municipal utility with AMI At least in front of meter Not distributed generation behind meter
Natural gas data harder to get from IOU w/o AMI Traffic modeled from few, infrequent fitting
points Beyond measuring what we do, policy
development needs models to predict how we will respond Response to O-Power usage comparisons known Response to TOU rates unknown
Technically very useful to have lots of personal data but gets into privacy issues
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 23
New Metrics for FC Policy Community total energy use from electricity
and natural gas, normalized to weather & population
Distinguish growth in electrification of transport & heat from conservation in traditional electric use
Energy-related impacts of new development for development review process
Multi-modal transportation use & availability Fleet average fuel efficiency and the number
of electric vehicles in Fort Collins Energy affordability: bill to household income
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 24
Possible Roles of Municipal Electric Utility
Distribute energy Certainly Only electric or district
heat/cool? Generate energy
Establishment of PRPA forbids significant generation by muni utility
But muni customers permitted unlimited generation – w/o utility financing
Conservation services Only electrical? Also heat, gas? Compete with private
industry?
Ancillary services Manage distributed
generation Manage loads - demand
response, balancing Share information that other
service providers can profitably use.
Smart grid control Direct control of selected
loads? Signal need & let user
choose how to respond? Real-time two-way pricing
and energy transactions? Require demand &
generation controllability? Public education
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 25
Sharing vs. Independence
Popular belief that distributed generation means disconnecting from grid. Which grid: Electric, Natural Gas, Hot/Chilled Water? Fuel cell electric generation needs fuel pipeline.
Distributed as much a reason to connect as central generation: Both local generation & load are stochastic and don’t
correlate well. Geographic & type diversity help solar & wind immensely. Storage helps, but very expensive. Sharing makes most economical use of expensive
renewable generation & storage. CHP for use of heat, not grid independence.
Distributed generation is not building energy independence.
4/22/2015
Will we still need a utility?
Peter M. O'Neill 26
Pricing in FC Policy Recover costs, no profit Customer pays cost of his service Regionally competitive bills, not rates Clear, long-term rate direction Gradual rate/bill changes Pair inducements with enablers so as not to be
punitive, e.g. peak pricing with demand response As pioneer, seek corp. & gov. R&D funding Enable energy services to compete by charging by:
Attribute – what is delivered: energy, capacity, ancillary services
Temporal granularity – when it is delivered Locational granularity – where it is delivered
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 27
Assisting Poor
Electricity from wind & solar more expensive per kWh than coal.
So keep bill same or less by improving efficiency.
Poor don’t have savings to pay for improvements up front.
Provide energy audit followed by grant, rebate, on-bill financing of energy improvements.
Poor avoid audit because of fear of discovering code violations.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 28
Changing Behavior, Not Just Technology
4/22/2015
How to compress this highly skewed distribution?
Peter M. O'Neill 29
Changing Behavior, Not Just Technology
Concepts of community-based social marketing & behavioral economics. Information must spark action.
Carrots or Sticks? Reduce VMT by charging for parking or by providing more
frequent bus service. Charges, penalties, restrictions can drive traffic & development
to places w/o good energy policies. Liberty or Government dictates?
Listen to people say what they want or need. Tell people what they need to know & may not realize the
consequences of. Know when to end or change incentives
Net metering ultimately leaves nobody to pay for grid. End subsidies when technology is competitive.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 30
Privacy & Security Technologies like demand response &
distributed generation rely on more measurement, communication & control than traditional utility systems
Proper & beneficial uses: Matching demand to generation Minimizing customer energy costs Targeted marketing of efficiency services &
equipment? Opportunities for malicious use:
Steal customer identity or financial info Track customer behavior Hijack appliances
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 31
Progress Slow, Many Small Parts
• 1.5% additional total city energy savings per year is among the best in the USA.
• Hope to increase to 2.5%/yr. by 2020
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 32
Conservation Stories Residential PV subsidies fully subscribed early each
year. Tiered electric rates in summer 2012
City Council ordered w/o study Confounded by High Park fire, extreme heat Only largest customers used less energy Peak power demand not reduced
On-bill financing of home efficiency improvements Disappointing uptake Rental property: owner pays while renter benefits, no
incentive WiFi thermostats for demand response – High
uptake Time-Of-Use rates
Starting with a pilot because ... Guessing wrong could drop revenue below cost4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 34
Trends & Opportunities
Home automation & IoT Optimized energy use Flexible demand response Even management of distributed generation & storage
Ancillary service aggregation Collect, model & control small, distributed loads,
generators & storage to create schedulable, dispatchable energy resources
Every person & vehicle with GPS connected to cellular network: Public transit more predictable & accessible Variety of vehicle rental & sharing
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 35
Trends & Opportunities (cont.)
Communication & Control Predictive, stochastic modeling of renewable
generation, loads & demand response Transactive, self-organizing (not central) control Smart inverters to support grid & allow islanding.
(Current inverter standard is “do no harm”) Observation: One of biggest sources of improvement
in machinery in last half-century has been ability to turn design constants into operational variables.
Energy Districts Combined Heat & Power, microgrid Share thermal sources & loads in water loops like
electric grid Geo-exchange loops difficult to install → put under
streets & common areas to share
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 36
The Big Barrier - Finance The major barrier to adoption of new energy
technology Most conservation technology pays off over
its life, while wind & PV generation are close.
Challenge is how to pay up-front for savings over time, especially given short-sightedness of households and companies.
Many models rely on special tax treatments that must end as renewables become common.
Adding cost of carbon (& other externalities) would make this work with straightforward accounting & w/o tax breaks.4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 37
Technical Idea: Solar Photochemical Liquid Fuel Reactor
Some applications will always need high density energy storage Aviation Construction
Chemical energy density orders of magnitude greater than electrical or thermal storage.
Biologic conversion of solar to chemical (photosynthesis) extremely inefficient Sun annual average flux, latitude 40º – 232 W/m2
Photosynthesis in switchgrass – 0.27 W/m2 , 0.12% efficiency. Photovoltaic at 15.5% - 36 W/m2 , 133x better
Artificial photosynthesis: Generate liquid fuel from its combustion products (in air) and water by solar radiation.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 38
Acknowledgements
John Phelan – FCU Energy Services Manager Steve Catenach – Former FCU Light & Power
Director Lucinda Smith – FC Environmental Services
Director Greg Behm – Energy Board member, engineer John Bleem – PRPA Strategic Planning Director Rocky Mountain Institute – “Stepping Up”
Beyond my own reading and investigating, a lot of material and ideas in this presentation came from dedicated City of Ft. Collins staff and Energy Board members including:
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 41
Household Consumption
4/22/2015
Electricity20%
Natural Gas65%
Gasoline 15%
Energy Consumption by Source
Me
Efficient Neighbors
All Neighbors
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
Electricity (kWh)
Me
Efficient Neighbors
All Neighbors
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Natural Gas (Therms)
Can Individuals Afford Clean Energy?
4/22/2015 42
Gasoline10%
Electricity9%
Natural Gas11%
Water6%
Sewer & Drainage
8%Trash2%
Cable TV14%Internet
5%
Phone & DSL18%
Phone, mobile19%
My Energy & Other Utilities Take my utility expenses
2 people, 2 cars, 2 cell phones Efficient house Live close to activities Count all electric as purchased
from utility (ignore PV) Energy only 30% Discretionary > 32%
A lot didn’t exist 20 years ago but has great use
Could make room for substantial energy cost increase Wouldn’t get more use for it Would use less
Peter M. O'Neill
Peter M. O'Neill 44
Residential Consumption
Generally, poor people use less energy so bills are also lower, but still higher relative to income.
Contrary to expectation that poor have low efficiency so forced to consume more energy.
Third quartile of use
Second quartile of use
median
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 46
Decarbonizing Heat
Space, water, process heat account for ~20% of GHG.
Can only go so far with conservation. CAP calls for substituting renewable electricity &
biofuels for fossil fuels. Don’t want electrical resistance heating. Electric alternative is heatpump (with thermal storage?) Geo-exchange only heatpump for Colorado winter
nights Wells are expensive & messy Alter code & practice to build shared wells with
subdivision infrastructure What happened to solar thermal with storage?
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 47
Some Alternative Mission Statements
Mike Weedall of E-Source, formerly director of Bonneville Power Authority: " Improve our customers' lives, strengthen thecommunity we serve, protect the environment ..."
Utilities changing rapidly due to technological & market forces.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 48
Smart Meters
Privacy Data collection and transmission
Collects data in 15-minute or 1-hour intervals Transmits several times per day via brief signal Encrypted
Not frequent enough to identify appliance Even mechanical meter can be read by prowler to
assess occupancy Health effects
0.1% transmit duty cycle (86 seconds per day) and 250mW transmit power.
Lower energy density than many other RF sources, e.g. cell phone, WiFi access point
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 49
Involving the Public Seeking public input
Proper forum & format Vocalism vs. democracy
Gaining public acceptance Cost is only energy topic on most citizens’ minds Social marketing concepts
Suspicions by some elements of society Gov. or utility spying & control Global warming doubters Belief that “an exponential can last forever”
(contrary to Gordon Moore & reason) Technical knowledge of public.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 50
Authority of Government & Utility Relative to private industry
Distributed generation: Own or only connect? Efficiency services: Offer or leave to industry? Operational information that other service providers can
make novel uses of: Share or restrict? Energy policy compliance
Education & awareness? Lead by example? Incentives? Requirements? Penalties? Direct implementation by government or utility?
Smart grid control Direct control of selected loads? Signal need & let user choose how to respond? Real-time two-way pricing and energy transactions? Require demand & generation controllability?
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 51
Some financing models:
On-bill financing Loan by utility for improvements paid in bill. Strive for pmt ≤ energy savings. Use aggregation & borrowing power of utility.
Lease Company borrows money to make improvements, which
they own. Company sells benefit to utility with tax benefit, e.g. PV
power purchase agreement. Customer repays company lease with utility bill saving.
Community generation ownership Allows those w/o proper site to invest at utility scale. Federal tax benefit that nonprofit muni can’t take.
4/22/2015
Peter M. O'Neill 52
Public (& Press) Misunderstanding
Energy (generation) vs. Power (demand, capacity) Source capacity factors vary widely Coal 88%, Wind 40%, Solar PV 17%
Load to source matching – instantaneous, not just day and night
Carbon intensity of source Energy source vs. energy carrier Distributed generation not building independence
Solar needs sharing even with storage Thermal gen needs fuel pipeline CHP for use of heat, not grid independence
Biological effects of RF from smart meter
4/22/2015