Pesticide screening LC-QTOF, Agilent. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark...

40
Pesticide screening LC-QTOF, Agilent

Transcript of Pesticide screening LC-QTOF, Agilent. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark...

Pesticide screeningLC-QTOF, Agilent

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition• National Food Institute

– EURL– NRL– Personale og udstyr

• Kolibri• Agilent LC-QTOF• Bruker LC-QTOF

• Background – pesticide analysis– Number of pesticides– Quantitative analysis – LC-MS/MS– Pesticide screening

• Construction of Library• Development of method

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Pesticides• Pesticide manual: 1436 pesticides

– Metabolites– Isomers

• PCDL library of Agilent: 1664 pesticides including relevant metabolites

• Our library: 1716 pesticides including relevant metabolites – retention times of around 1/3 of these

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Pesticides in our laboratory

Number of pesticides introduced to the LC-QTOF

Quantitative method: 311 Pesticides

Qualitative method: 680 pesticides

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Disposition

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

Validation

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-

QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

PCD – CSV file

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Formula – database - generator

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

PCDL - library

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

PCDL – library - spectra

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

PCDL – library - spectra

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Pesticide screening

QuEChERS

UPLC-methodEluent A: 0.1% formic acid + 5 mM ammonia in water

Eluent B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile

Analysis time: 20 min

Q-TOFFull scan - m/z = 50-1000

In positive and negative mode

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Overview on MS Analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

No selection

QTOF-analysis – MS scan

No collision

• Used to determine retention time

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Selection of single mass

QTOF-analysis – Targeted MS/MS

Collision

10, 20 and 40 V

• Obtaining compound spectra for Library• Spectra of daughter ions from the single

ion isolated in the quadropole

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

No selection

QTOF-analysis – MS scan with collision

Collision

10, 20 and 40 V

• Screening samples• Spectra of daughter ions of all compounds

eluting on a certain time point

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Chromatogram - TIC

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Spectra – MSscan incl. collision

0V

10V

20V

40V

Ofurace, [M+H]+

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-QTOF analysis

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Library Search - result

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Screening analysis

LibraryLC-QTOF analysis

Validation

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Qualitative versus QuantitativeScreening method Confirmatory method

Qualitative (detectability) Quantitative (RSD)

No full identification (selectivity) Unambiguous identification

Result = + or – Result = value ± SD

• Automated MS-based methods using accurate mass instruments such ToFs

• Bioassays – now seldom used

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Validation – screening methodRequirement: Confidence in detection/identification of an analyte at a certain concentration has to be established

• Need to establish the lowest level of an analyte can be detected in 95% of samples (false negative rate of 5% is acceptable)

• No requirements with regard to linearity or recovery

• Exclude false positive results by analysing unspiked (‘blank’) samples.

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Validation – screening method• Analyse 20 different samples for each commodity group

spiked at the anticipated screening reporing level (SRL)

• Samples should cover multiple matrices from the commodity with a minimum of 2 samples per matrix group.

• Once applied routinely, on-going QC data should be acquired.

• For any new analyte further validation is required in order to be able to specify the Screening Detection Limit (SDL)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Considerations of validation setup• How many different samples?

– Can we make 2 samples of one apple? – Or do we need to purchase two apples?

• We have a wish to validate at 3 levels– This is many samples to clean up– Can we then spike after Clean up?

• No control of recovery!

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Alternative validation plan

20 blank samples are cleaned up

20 samples spiked at 0.10 mg/kg are cleaned up

a

A

b

B

, …

, …

t

T

  0.10 µg/ml Blank

0.10 µg/ml 500 µl 0 µl

0.05 µg/ml 500 µl 500 µl

0.01 µg/ml 100 µl 900 µl

Blank 0 µl 500 µl

The spiked samples are then diluted with the blank samples

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark

Thank you for

your attention