Performance Evaluation in Conventional and …...5. PV Module technology & manufacturing • 98-99%...
Transcript of Performance Evaluation in Conventional and …...5. PV Module technology & manufacturing • 98-99%...
Performance Evaluation in Conventional and Rectenna Solar Cells
Sachit GroverDevice Physicist, First Solar, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA, USA
2006-20112011-20132013-20142015-present
2
© C
op
yrig
ht
20
15
, Fi
rst
Sola
r, I
nc.
4
© C
op
yrig
ht
20
15
, Fi
rst
Sola
r, I
nc.
http://investor.firstsolar.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=917926
http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_chart.jpg
Record efficiency: 18.6% aperture area efficiency (18.2% full area)
"At one time, we might have been characterized as a low cost, low efficiency technology, but consistent with our technology projections we are now proving that CdTe thin film delivers both industry-leading performance AND sustainable thin-film cost structures.“
-Raffi Garabedian, First Solar CTO
5
© C
op
yrig
ht
20
15
, Fi
rst
Sola
r, I
nc.
PV Module technology & manufacturing
• 98-99% reduction insemiconductor material
— Direct bandgap material
• Fully integrated, continuous process vs. batch processing
• Large 60 x 120cm (2' x 4')superstrate vs. 6" wafers
First Solar Fully Integrated, Automated and Continuous Thin Film (CdTe) Process
Polysilicon Ingot Wafer Solar ModuleSolar Cell
Conventional Crystalline Silicon Batch Technology
Glass In < 2.5 Hours Module Out
Semiconductor Deposition
CellDefinition
Final Assembly & Test
6
© C
op
yrig
ht
20
15
, Fi
rst
Sola
r, I
nc.
Superior Temperature Coefficient of CdTe yields more energy
• Temperate Climate Example:
— Module Temps often reach 65°C; 40°C
above the STC rating
— The silicon module power output will be reduced by up to 20% at this temperature
— FSLR output will be reduced by only 10%
• Hot Climate:
— More hours at higher temps (Module
temps can reach 85°C)
— FS Advantage grows more pronouncedVirtuani, 25th EUPVSEC, 2010
Combining suns-VOC and VOC(T) to quantify recombination in solar cells
Outline
• Derive theoretical dependence of VOC on
• Light intensity
• Temperature
• Strength of recombination channels
• Apply formulation to
• Quantify recombination in different regions of the cell
• Extract material and interface quality
Grover et. al., APL, 103, 093502, 2013
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 7
Express VOC in terms of SRH recombination in different regions
Quantitative estimate of (microscopic) recombination from conventional (macroscopic) measurements
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 8
CIGS solar cellRau, Appl. Phys. A 69, 1999
Epitaxial silicon heterojunctionBranz, Thin Solid Films, 519, 2011
Recombination → Quasi-Fermi separation → VOC
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 9
+
-
EFn
EFp
+
-
+
-
qVOC
+++
Heterojunction solar cell
Jo,total = Jo,Radiation + Jo,Auger + Jo,SRH + Jo,emitter + Jo,rear
Voc =kT
qln
Jsc
Jo,total
+1æ
èç
ö
ø÷
Not precise but workable!Loss of exact dependences on recombination mechanisms
Emitter
(p-type)
Absorber
(n-type)
Quasi-neutralSpace-charge
InterfaceFront surface
Rear surface
Majority of photogenerated carrier recombination at VOC
Relating VOC to carrier concentrations via β
For constant QFL separation, β is constant across cell
β2 = NDΔp/ni2 in quasi-neutral region
β can similarly be used to relate ne and ph at interface
emitter absorber
β
How to think of VOC in this analysis:
•Not a performance metric but a variable
•Depends on light intensity, temperature, and recombination
•Constant or near constant throughout the cell
•Breaks down for very strong recombination
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 10
AFORS-HET
Recombination rate depends on limited availability of carriers
• Express recombination in terms of β
• Recombination
– Rate per unit volume: USRH
– Rate integrated over thickness: RSRH=USRH*thickness
• Equate generation and recombination G*W=ΣRSRH
– G*W=Jph
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 11
Rate limiting carrier type:
Interface: electrons
Quasi-neutral: holes
Space-charge: both
Defining all recombination with common β
• Simplified SRH equation:
• Quasi-neutral/Bulk (n=1)
– ND >> Δp
– Activation: Eg
• Interface (n=1)
– p >> n
– Activation: Φnb,0
• Space charge (n=2)
– p ≈ n
– Activation: Eg
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 12
Scheer, JAP, 105, 104505, 2009
SRH
p n
npU
n p
Recombination = Generation
R0
bb 2 + R0
Ib 2 + R0
db = Gx dxW
ò = GavgW
Solve quadratic to obtain β & VOC
+
-
EFn
EFp
+
-
+
-Quasi neutral
Space charge
Interface
Φnb,0
Eg
q VOC
p-type
(emitter)
n-type
(absorber)
+++
++ +
--Φnb,0-qVOC
light
WGdxGRRR avg
W
x
dIb
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 13
Formula for VOC
VOC = 2kT
qln
k1 1+ k2Gavg -1éë
ùû
ni
é
ë
êê
ù
û
úú.
k1 =R0
d
2 R0
I + R0
b( ); k2 = 4W
R0
I + R0
b( )R0
d( )2
.
VOC dependence on:
• Operating conditions: light intensity, temperature
• Strength of SRH recombination in bulk, interface, and depletion
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 14
Fitting the light intensity dependence of VOC
k1 =R0
d
2 R0
I + R0
b( ); k2 = 4W
R0
I + R0
b( )R0
d( )2
.VOC = 2kT
qln
k1 1+ k2Gavg -1éë
ùû
ni
é
ë
êê
ù
û
úú.
Measured light-intensity dependence of VOC
0.50.40.30.20.1
Gavg (suns)
0.58
0.56
0.54
0.52
0.50
0.48
VO
C (
V)
Voc ( fit)
Coefficients (values ± sigma)
k1=3.5E14 ± 4E12 cm-3
k2=20.8 ± 0.35 suns-1
a-Si/c-Si heterojunction solar cellusing heteroepitaxial silicon film
Convert light intensity generation rate
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 15
Define and fit ideality factor (n)
n Gavg( ) =k2Gavg
1+ k2Gavg 1+ k2Gavg -1éë
ùû
n k2Gavg ® 0{ } = 2
n k2Gavg ®¥{ } = 1
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Ideality
factor: n
0.50.40.30.20.1
Gavg (suns)
0.60
0.58
0.56
0.54
0.52
0.50
VO
C (
V)
n ( fit)
Voc ( fit)
k2 = 22.1 suns-1
k1=3.36x1014
cm-3
k2=22.1 suns-1
(fixed)
k1 & k2 are sufficient for quantifying recombination in absence of interface
n =kT
q
d lnGavg
dVOC
é
ëê
ù
ûú
-1
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 16
Defining activation energy from VOC(T) extrapolation
VOC TR( ) =Ea
q+ TR
dVOC
dT TR
Ea =R0
bEg TR( ) + R0
Ifb,0
n TR( )R0
b + R0
I.
VOC = 2kT
qln
k1 1+ k2Gavg -1éë
ùû
ni
é
ë
êê
ù
û
úú.
Ea≠ Eg linked to interface recombinationAssuming k2Gavg >> 1 (negligible SCR, large fwd. bias):
Weighted mean of activation energiesWeights = strength of recombination
+
-
EFn
EFp
+
-
+
- Quasi neutral
Space charge
Interface
Φnb,0
Eg
q VOC
p-type (emitter)
n-type (absorber)
+ + +
+ + +
- - Φnb,0-qVOC
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
VO
C (
V)
4003002001000
Temperat ure (K)
EgEa
Extrapolated temperature dependence
VOC TR( ) =Ea
q+ TR
dVOC
dT TR
Linear extrapolation of VOC(T)
Substitute explicit dependence of VOC on T
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 17
Quantifying recombination in different regions
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
VO
C (
V)
4003002001000
Temperat ure (K)
EgEa
+
-
EFn
EFp
+
-
+
- Quasi neutral
Space charge
Interface
Φnb,0
Eg
q VOC
p-type (emitter)
n-type (absorber)
+ + +
+ + +
- - Φnb,0-qVOC
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Ideality factor: n
0.50.40.30.20.1
Gavg (suns)
0.60
0.58
0.56
0.54
0.52
0.50
VO
C (
V)
n ( fit)
Voc ( fit)
k2 = 22.1 suns-1
k1=3.36x1014
cm-3
k2=22.1 suns-1
(fixed)
Light-intensity variation Extrapolated temperature dependence
k1
k2
Ea
ì
íï
îïï
ü
ýï
þïï
VOC (T ,G )C (V )
¾ ®¾¾¾
Rb =16%
Rd = 46%
RI = 38%
ì
í
ïï
î
ïï
ü
ý
ïï
þ
ïïat 1 sun
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 18
Recombination analysis in CIGS cells with varying [Ga]
0.80
0.76
0.72
VO
C (V
)
1.71.61.51.41.31.21.1
Bandgap Eg (eV)
10-1
100
101
RI 0
/Rb
0
(a)
(b)
M.A. Contreras, et.al., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. (2012).
Grover et. al., APL, 103, 093502, 2013
•Agreement of lifetime obtained from VOC(T,I) and TRPL
•Successfully tracks nuances of recombination variations based on material properties
(a): VOC vs. bandgap (Eg) for CIGS solar cells. VOC saturates as Eg increases with increasing Ga content. (b): Ratio of interface (RI
0) and bulk (Rb0) recombination
strengths increases dramatically for the higher bandgap samples.
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 19
Li et.al., A recombination analysis of CIGS solar cells with low and high Ga compositions,Sol. Energy Mat. and Sol. Cells, 124 (2014) 143-149
Procedure for calculation of recombination rates
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 20
New equation for temperature coefficient of VOC
• n – ideality factor; combines all recombination channels
• n/m – experimental fitting parameter
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 21
• VOC’ depends on interface recombination and Fermi-pinning
• Smaller VOC’ for larger interface recombination → not necessarily good
Green, PIP, 11(5), 333–340, 2003
Grover, 42nd PVSC, 2015
High [Ga] CIGS cells are interface limited
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 22
Rearrange terms to calculate interface contribution:
Questions so far?
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 23
Operating Principle of Rectennas
• Square-law rectification
– Signal strength smaller than diode switching voltage
1 mV for 1 sun incident over 1 μm2 and 100 Ω antenna
• Key diode parameters
– Resistance (RD), responsivity (βi)
9/17/2015 24
I
VVD
Diode I(V) curve
antenna
diode
Rectenna
EM wave
Grover @ UNSW
Operating range and industry impact
• Potential for high-efficiency low-cost
– 90% efficient microwave rectennas exist
Large-signal: diode operates as switch
• Current state
– IR detectors demonstrated (Q.E. ~ 0.01% @ 10.6 μm)*
– Solar cells proposed in 1972, no practical demonstration as yet
9/17/2015 25
Terahertz Infrared Visible
• Spectral range and applications
Detection• Active and passive imager
• Interconnect receiver
Energy harvesting• Solar
• Thermal
antenna
diode
load
*Phiar Corp., NRO report 2002Grover @ UNSW
Requirements for Efficient Rectennas
• Intrinsically fast diode
• Low RD to match to RA
• Low CD to prevent shunting RD
• High βi for rectification
• Large VA for high power-conversion efficiency
• Efficient antennas
9/17/2015 26
~
RA
VA CDβi, RD
DiodeAntenna
Small-signal circuit model of rectenna
Rdiode
Rload
+
Vload
-
Iload
+ Load
Antenna to diode coupling
Diode design
Field enhancement
Grover @ UNSW
Metal/Insulator/Metal Diode
• Mechanism
– Tunneling across thin insulator
Nonlinear I(V)
Femtosecond fast
• Summary of work done
– Fabrication
Sputtered metals and insulators
– Simulation
Transfer matrix method
– Modification
Field effect transistor
Double-insulator (MIIM) barrier design
9/17/2015 27
M1 M2I (nm scale)
VD
e-
E
x
VD
MIM diode energy-band profile
Grover @ UNSW
Grover, Ph.D. Thesis, CU Boulder, 2011
Semiclassical Theory of Rectification in MIM
Photon-assisted transport applies when ħω/e~ voltage-scale of diode nonlinearity
9/17/2015 28
Classical: low frequency Semiclassical: high frequency
2, ;illum D n dark D
n
eVI V V J I V n
e
Grover, et.al, J. Phys D., 46 (13), 135106, 2013; Tien, Gordon, Phys. Rev., 129(2), 1963
VD
Vω
E
x
VD
E
+ħω
x
-ħω
diode
DC I(V) under illumination:
Vωcos(ωt) ~
J1
J0
J-1
Grover @ UNSW
Efficiency limit for monochromatic response of rectenna
• Assume ideal diode – high fwd/rev asymmetry
• 1 μW input (low intensity regime) – 1 photon process
• |VO| < ћω/q, 1photon/1electron
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 29
|VO| < ћω/q
|VO| = ћω/q
|VO| > ћω/q
(μA
)
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
Calculating broadband rectenna response for solar spectrum
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 30
Frequency spectrum Time-domain signal
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
Efficiency limit for rectifying solar radiation (quantum regime)
• 5700 K blackbody
• 1000 W/m2
• Spatial coherence area ~19 μm
• Maximum power ~1.1 μW
• Quantum operation
• Peak efficiency ~ 44%
– Matches Shockley-Queisser’s ultimate efficiency limit
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 31
I ill
um
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
Joshi, Moddel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 083901 (2013)
Can we exceed the 44% limit?
• Microwave rectennas > 70%
• Use low energy photons?
• Three regimes
– Quantum (α < 1)
– Transition (α ~ 1)
– Classical (α >> 1)
• Increase diode voltage, relative to ћω/q
• Two ways to reach classical operating regime
– High input intensity
– High radiation resistance
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 32
VD
α = qVD/ћω
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
Pin = 100 μW
Transition regime
Effect of input intensity on operating regime
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 33
• Low intensity, high frequency
• Frequency-dependent
• Hump observed
Pin = 100 nW
Quantum regime
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
• Higher intensity, multiple photons
• Frequency-dependent
• Multiple steps
• Very high intensity
• Frequency independent
• Large number of photons
Pin = 10 mW
Classical regime
Joshi, Ph.D. Thesis, CU Boulder, 2015
Conclusion: efficiency limits of optical rectennas
• Quantum operation
– Low intensity, high frequency - single photon process
– Monochromatic efficiency 100%
– Broadband efficiency maximum = 44%
– Split-spectrum > 44%
• (Quantum) classical operation
– Possible at high frequencies through photon mixing → large voltage operation
– Broadband efficiency > 44%
• Rectenna solar cell efficiency can exceed Shockley-Queisser limit
– Through multi-photon process at high intensity
• Challenges
– Coherence limits power
– High diode resistance large RC time-constant
– Diode breakdown
9/17/2015 Grover @ UNSW 34
Slide courtesy: Saumil Joshi, UC Boulder
Thank you.
Email: [email protected]