Performance Appraisal 1
-
Upload
ankit13mba132 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Performance Appraisal 1
-
Performance Appraisalhttp://studygalaxy.com/
-
Performance Appraisal : Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all those procedures that are used to evaluate the personality, performance, potential, of its group members
-
Relationship between jab analysis and performance appraisal:Job analysisperformanceperformancestandards appraisal
Describes work& Personnel RequirementOf a particularjobTranslate job Into levels of acceptableOr unacceptableperformance
Describes the Jobs relevant strengths and weakness ofEach individual
-
Question arises?Why do we measure performance? Effective performance appraisal systems How do we measure performance?
-
CharacteristicsIt is a step by step processIt examine the employee strengths and weaknessesScientific and objective studyOngoing and continuous processSecure information for making correct decisions on employees
-
Needs and Objectives:Provide feedback about employeesProvide databaseDiagnose the S & W of individualsProvide coaching, counseling, career planning to subordinatesDevelop positive relation and reduce grievanceFacilitates research in personnel management
-
Appraisal Benefits Appraisals offer employees:DirectionFeedbackMotivation
-
Appraisal BenefitsAppraisals offer the company:DocumentationEmployee DevelopmentFeedbackLegal protectionMotivation system
-
Why Appraisals Are ImportantRecognize accomplishmentsGuide progressImprove performance
-
Why Important (cont.)Review performanceSet goalsIdentify problemsDiscuss career advancement
-
Steps in performance appraisalEstablishing job standards
Designing an appraisal programme
Appraise performance
Performance interview
Use appraisal dataFor appropriate purpose
-
Process of PASetting performancestandardsTaking correctivestandardsDiscussingresultsComparing standardsMeasuringstandardsCommunicatingstandards
-
Issues in appraisal systemAppraisal Design?Formal and informalWhose performance?Who are the raters?What problems?How to solve?What to evaluate?When to evaluate?What methods?
-
How PA contribute to firms competitive advantages Improving performanceMaking correct decisionEnsuring legal competenceMinimizing dissatisfactionAnd turnoverValues and behaviorCompetitive advantage
-
Problems in performance appraisalErrors In ratingHalo effectsStereotypingCentral tendencyPersonal bias
-
Set Goals.Based on job requirementsRealisticMeasurableObservableChallenging
-
During the MeetingReview performance:Based on previous goalsNoting strengths and accomplishmentsIdentifying areas for improvement
-
End the MeetingEncourage good performanceLay out action planCommunicate outcome of goals not metConfirm understanding
-
Continuous FeedbackFormal appraisalsInformal appraisalsOpen communication
-
Recognize Good PerformanceVerbalPublicTangibleMonetary
-
Performance Appraisal MethodsIndividual Evaluation Methods Confidential report Essay evaluation Critical incidents Checklists Graphic rating scale Behaviorally anchored rating scaleMBO
-
Critical Incident methodEx: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident
Workersreactionscale
Ainformed the supervisor immediately 5BBecome anxious on loss of output 4Ctried to repair the machine 3DComplained for poor maintenance 2Ewas happy to forced test 1
-
Checklist methodSimple checklist methodForced choice methodSimple checklist method:Is employee regular Y/NIs employee respected by subordinateY/NIs employee helpfulY/NDoes he follow instruction Y/NDoes he keep the equipment in orderY/N
-
Forced choice methodCriteriaRating
1.Regularity on the jobMostLeastAlways regularInform in advance for delayNever regularRemain absentNeither regular nor irregular
-
Graphic Rating ScaleContinuous Rating ScaleEmployee name_________Deptt_______Raters name ___________Date________------------------------------------------------------------------------Exc.GoodAcceptableFairPoor 5 4 3 2 1 _ DependabilityInitiativeOverall outputAttendanceAttitudeCooperationTotal score Continuous Rating Scale
-
BARS( behaviorally Anchored rating scale)Step 1.Identify critical incidents
Step 2.Select performance dimension
Step 3.Retranslate the incidents
Step 4.Assign scales to incidents
Step 5.Develop final instrument
-
MBO ProcessSet organizational goalsDefining performance targetPerformance reviewfeedback
-
Group AppraisalRanking Paired comparison Performance tests Field review technique
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont.)
-
Ranking methodEmployeeRank
A2
B1
C3
D5
E4
-
Paired comparison methodAppraiser compares each employee with every other employee , one at a time.
For ex:
there are 5 employees A,B,C,D,ESo the performance of a will A compared with B & decision will be taken on whose performance is betterthen A is compared with rest all one by one.
-
Field review methodPerformancesubordinatepeers superiorcustomerDimension
Leadership ^ ^
Communication ^^
Interpersonal skills ^^
Decision making^ ^ ^
Technical skills^ ^ ^
Motivation^ ^ ^
-
Performance criteria for executivesFor top managersReturn on capital employedContribution to companies developmentDegree of growth and expansion of employees
-
For middle level managersDepartmental performanceCoordination among employeesDegree of clarity about corporate goals and policiesAchievement of standards
-
For supervisorsQuality and quantity of output in a given period Labor cost per unit of output in a given periodMaterial cost per unit in a given periodRate of absenteeism and turnover of employeesNo of accidents in a given period
*