Perceptually Guided Expressive Facial Animation

Perceptually Guided Expressive Facial Animation

Zhigang Deng and Xiaohan Ma

Computer Graphics and Interactive Media LabDepartment of Computer Science

University of Houston

http://graphics.cs.uh.edu

Talk Outline• Motivation

• Related Work

• Our Approach– Construction of facial perceptual metric– Perceptually Guided Facial Animation Algorithms

• Results and User Studies

• Conclusions and Discussion

Motivations

• How to efficiently measure and synthesize realistic expressive facial animation?– The ultimate measuring stick is human perception.– Intrinsic sensitivity to the subtlety of animated faces

• Current popular means is to conduct subjective user studies (offline, post-production evaluation tool)– Not automated (tedious human involvements)– Inefficient (time-consuming experiment setup and user

study)– Costly (participant cost)

Related Work

• Facial animation techniques– Geometric deformation [Singh and Fiume 98, Noh and Neumann 01,Sumner and

Popovic 04], physically-based [Lee et al 95, Sifakis et al. 05], performance driven facial animation [Williams 90], facial expression synthesis and editing [zhang et al. 03, Joshi et al. 03]

• Data-driven approaches for facial animation [Brand 99, Chuang et al. 02, Vlasic et al. 05,Wampler et al. 07,Bregler et al. 97, Kshirsagar and Thalmann 03, Cao et al. 04, Deng and Neumann 06]– Focus on the mathematical accuracy/efficiency of their algorithms– Little attention has been paid to perceptual aspects to their algorithms

• Automatic analysis of facial expressions in computer vision community [Pantic and Rothkrantz 00, Tian et al. 01, Valstar and Pantic 06]

– Focus on analysis side of facial expressions

Related Work

• User studies for character animation [Hodgins et al. 98, Sullivan and Dingliana 01, Sullivan et al. 03, Watson et al. 01, Reitsma and Pollard 03, Wang and Bodenheimer 04, McDonnell et al. 06, McDonnell et al. 07]– Measure the association between human perception and factors of

character animation• Subjective evaluation have been also conducted to gain

human perceptual insight on facial animation [Cunningham et al. 03, Cunningham et al. 04, Wallraven et al. 05, Wallraven et al. 08, Geiger et al. 03, Cosker et al. 05]– Most of these efforts are centered at the qualitative side

• Our work– Aim to quantitatively model (perceptual metric) the association

between facial motion and perceptual outcomes– Further exploit this perceptual metric to build perceptually guided

expressive facial animation algorithms

Our Work

• A novel computational facial perceptual metric (FacePEM)

– Measuring and predict the expressiveness (type/scale) of synthetic expressive facial animations

– Learn statistical perceptual prediction model (FacePEM) which can measure and predict the perceptual outcomes of arbitrary facial motion

• FacePEM-guided facial animation algorithms

– Perceptual metric-guided speech animation synthesis

– Expressive facial motion editing enhanced with expressiveness cues

Construction of FacePEM

Data Acquisition

• Optical motion capture system for facial motion capture

• 103 facial markers (95 face markers, 4 head markers, and 4 neck markers)

• Four human subjects spoke sentences with four emotions (happy, angry, sad, and neutral)

• Remove head motion and align facial motions of different subjects

Construction of FacePEM

User Evaluation Study• Participants were required to identify perceived emotion

and corresponding emotional expressiveness scale (1 to 10) as a nonforced-choice task after viewing each clip.

• 68 facial motion clips, 30 participants (university students)• Perceptual Outcome Vector (POV) for each facial motion

clip

Facial Motion Analysis

• Face segmentation– PCA is a global transformation; no

explicit correspondence between PCA eigen-vectors and localized facial movements.

– Physically-motivated segmentation [Joshi et al. 03]: six regions (forehead, eye, left cheek, right cheek, mouth, nose)

• Region-based motion reduction– Apply PCA for the movements of

each region– Region-based PCA eigen-vectors

correspond to meaningful, localized facial movements [Li and Deng 07].

The first/second largest eigen-vectors of the mouth region

The first/second largest eigen-vectors of the eye region

Facial Motion Modeling

• Modeling region-based expressive facial motion patterns– Use the M-order Linear Dynamical Systems (LDS) [Pavlovic et al. 00,

Chai and Hodgins 07] to model region-based facial motion patterns for any specific emotion

– 18 LDSs are fitted (6 regions*3 emotions), xn= ∑(Ai*xn-i)+vi

• Objective Matchness Vector (OMV) – Closeness function: Describes the closeness of any given facial

motion sequence at a specific facial region representing a specific emotion

– A OMV vector encloses 18 components

Pemo,reg (Si) = e-E

E = -ln F(S) = -ln F(x1:T) ≈ C*∑||xt-∑(Ajxt-j)-vj||2

Construction of FacePEM

Learning Perceptual Prediction• Statistical perceptual prediction model

– Predict its POV, based on the OMV of input facial motion sequence– Three approaches: Least-square based linear fitting, Radial Basis Functions

(RBFs) network approach, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs)– SVMs-based perceptual prediction model achieve the minimum error.

• Cross-Validation for test and validation– 54 facial motion clips as the training dataset – 14 facial motion clips as the test/validation dataset

Review of FacePEM Framework

Perceptually Guided Facial Animation Algorithms

• Perceptually guided expressive speech animation synthesis– The core part of many data-driven speech animation synthesis [Brelger et

al. 97, Kshirsagar and Thalmann 03, Cao et al. 04, Deng and Neumann 06]

– Cost = PhoMtchCost+ConstrCost+SmoCost– More intelligent and smart “cost function” with perceptual metric

• Expressive facial motion editing enhanced with expressiveness cues– Current facial motion editing techniques [Chuang et al. 02, Cao et al. 03, Joshi et

al. 03, Vlasic et al. 05, Li and Deng 07] do not provide feedback or expressiveness cues

– FacePEM will measure and display its updated emotion type and expressiveness scale to users in a timely means.

Perceptually Guided ExpressiveSpeech Animation Synthesis

• Choose an expressive speech animation synthesis algorithm [Deng and Neumann 06]

for test/validation • Predict emotion type and

expressiveness scale of facial motion sequence being synthesized, and Incorporate emotion scale into synthesis algorithm– EC(s,Emo)=C*(1-

Same(Emo, EmoLabel(s))) – EC(s, Emo) = C*(1-

CalcEmo(s)[Emo])

Facial Motion Editing Enhanced with Expressiveness Cues

• Choose an expressive facial motion editing system for validation [Li and Deng 07]

• Predict emotion type and expressiveness scale of the edited facial motion sequence

• Display expression type/scale to users as feedback

Results & Evaluation - I

• 20 expressive facial animation clips (10 from this work, 10 from previous work)

• 20 participants rated the visual fidelity (expression) of these clips

Results & Evaluation - II

• 10 expressive edited facial motion clips (5 from this work, 5 from previous work)

• 20 participants rated the visual fidelity (expression) of these clips

Discussion

• It is hard to know how much data would be enough to train well-behaviored statistical learning approaches

• We did not consider the effects of eye gaze motion• Limited emotion types (3 basic emotion) are

studied.• Idiosyncratic motion signals might exist in current

used facial motion dataset.

Conclusions

• We present a novel computational perceptual metrics for measuring and predict the expression (type/scale) of facial animations– Bridge human perceptual insights with objective facial

motion patterns• Demonstrated perceptually guided expressive

facial animation algorithms on two cases– Expressive speech animation synthesis– Interactive expressive facial motion editing

• Future Work– Study more data and expression types– Remove the idiosyncratic components from the data

Questions?