Percentage of cases disposed 12% Cases … I/JUDIC… · The Sandiganbayan conducts expeditious...
2
D . C O U R T O F A P P E A L S S T R A T E G I C O B J E C T I V E S M A N D A T E T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s w a s c r e a t e d o n D e c e m b e r 3 , 1 9 3 5 b y v i r t u e o f C o m m o n w e a l t h A c t N o . 3 a n d f o r m a l l y o r g a n i z e d o n F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 3 6 . I t s p r i n c i p a l m a n d a t e i s t o e x e r c i s e a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n o n a l l c a s e s n o t f a l l i n g w i t h i n t h e o r i g i n a l a n d e x c l u s i v e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t . I t s d e c i s i o n s a r e f i n a l e x c e p t w h e n a p p e a l e d t o t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t o n q u e s t i o n s o f l a w . I t a l s o e x e r c i s e s o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n o n t h e i s s u a n c e o f w r i t s o f m a n d a m u s , p r o h i b i t i o n , i n j u n c t i o n , c e r t i o r a r i , h a b e a s c o r p u s a n d a l l o t h e r w r i t s w h e t h e r o r n o t i n a i d o f i t s a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n . U n d e r B a t a s P a m b a n s a B l g . 1 2 9 o r t h e J u d i c i a r y R e o r g a n i z a t i o n A c t o f 1 9 8 0 , i n a d d i t i o n t o i t s o r i g i n a l m a n d a t e , i t w a s v e s t e d t h e a u t h o r i t y t o a s s u m e j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r a c t i o n s f o r a n n u l m e n t o f j u d g m e n t s o f t h e R e g i o n a l T r i a l C o u r t s a n d t h e p o w e r t o t r y a n d c o n d u c t h e a r i n g s , r e c e i v e e v i d e n c e a n d p e r f o r m a l l a c t s n e c e s s a r y t o r e s o l v e f a c t u a l i s s u e s f a l l i n g w i t h i n i t s o r i g i n a l a n d a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n . A s p e r R e p u b l i c A c t N o . 7 9 0 2 o f F e b r u a r y 2 3 , 1 9 9 5 , t h e a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n w a s e x p a n d e d t o i n c l u d e r e v i e w o f d e c i s i o n s , r e s o l u t i o n s , a w a r d s o r o r d e r s o f t h e S e c u r i t i e s a n d E x c h a n g e C o m m i s s i o n , S o c i a l S e c u r i t y S y s t e m , E m p l o y e e s C o m p e n s a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e C i v i l S e r v i c e C o m m i s s i o n . W i t h t h e e n a c t m e n t o f R e p u b l i c A c t N o . 8 2 4 6 , t w o s t a t i o n s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s w e r e c r e a t e d - o n e ( 1 ) i n C e b u C i t y w h i c h e x e r c i s e s j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c a s e s c o m i n g f r o m t h e V i s a y a s R e g i o n a n d a n o t h e r i n C a g a y a n d e O r o C i t y , e x e r c i s i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c a s e s c o m i n g f r o m t h e M i n d a n a o R e g i o n . A s e v i d e n c e d i n t h e c a s e
-
Upload
nguyenkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Percentage of cases disposed 12% Cases … I/JUDIC… · The Sandiganbayan conducts expeditious...
590 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016
KEY RESULT AREAS
Transparency, accountability and open governance
SECTOR OUTCOME
Rule of law
ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME
Judgment of graft and corrupt practices committed by public officials and employees independently, effectively and efficiently
rendered
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
KEY STRATEGIES
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
The Sandiganbayan conducts expeditious trials of criminal and civil cases involving offenses committed by public officers and
employees, including those employed in Government-Owned and / or Controlled Corporations.
ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES (OOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) BASELINE 2016 TARGETS
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Judgment of graft and corrupt practices committed by public
officials and employees independently, effectively and
efficiently rendered
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS (MFOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) 2016 Targets
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
MFO 1: RESOLUTIONS/DECISIONS OF CASES UNDER ITS JURISDICTION
Cases disposed 418
Cases Received/Processed 3,480
Percentage of cases disposed 12%
D. COURT OF APPEALS
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
MANDATE
The Court of Appeals was created on December 3, 1935 by virtue of Commonwealth Act No. 3 and formally organized on February 1,
1936. Its principal mandate is to exercise appellate jurisdiction on all cases not falling within the original and exclusive
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Its decisions are final except when appealed to the Supreme Court on questions of law. It also
exercises original jurisdiction on the issuance of writs of mandamus, prohibition, injunction, certiorari, habeas corpus and all other
writs whether or not in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Under Batas Pambansa Blg. 129 or the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980, in
addition to its original mandate, it was vested the authority to assume jurisdiction over actions for annulment of judgments of the
Regional Trial Courts and the power to try and conduct hearings, receive evidence and perform all acts necessary to resolve factual
issues falling within its original and appellate jurisdiction. As per Republic Act No. 7902 of February 23, 1995, the appellate
jurisdiction was expanded to include review of decisions, resolutions, awards or orders of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Social
Security System, Employees Compensation Commission and the Civil Service Commission. With the enactment of Republic Act No. 8246, two
stations of the Court of Appeals were created - one (1) in Cebu City which exercises jurisdiction over cases coming from the Visayas
Region and another in Cagayan de Oro City, exercising jurisdiction over cases coming from the Mindanao Region. As evidenced in the case
590 OFFICIAL GAZETTEGENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016
Vol. 111, No. 1 December 29, 2015
THE JUDICIARY 591
of St. Martin Funeral Home vs. National Labor Relations Commission, the Court now reviews decisions, orders and awards of the National
Labor Relations Commission. The Court also exercises the power of review over decisions of the National Amnesty Commission, Ombudsman
and other quasi judicial agencies not falling within the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. In accordance with the
decision in People vs. Mateo, cases decided by the Regional Trial Courts where the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or life
imprisonment or death are now brought to the Court of Appeals for appellate review. Under Republic Act No. 9160 or the Anti-Money
Laundering Act, the Court of Appeals exercises jurisdiction over actions for freezing of any monetary instrument or property alleged to
be the proceeds of any unlawful activity as defined by law. Upon the implementation of Republic Act No. 9372 dated February 19, 2007,
the Court of Appeals was vested with jurisdiction to act on cases involving crimes of terrorism and all other matters, incident or
related to the crimes and acts punishable under the said law. For that matter, the Supreme Court, in Administrative Order No. 118-2007
designated the First, Second and Third Divisions of the Court of Appeals to handle such cases coming from Metro Manila and Luzon. All
Divisions in Cebu City and Cagayan de Oro City stations will handle terrorism cases coming from Visayas and Mindanao, respectively.
VISION
A Court where judicial excellence is a daily reality.
MISSION
It is our desire to bring out the true essence of justice. Towards this end, we commit to give our best efforts in elevating the
level of efficiency of the members, officials and employees of the Court and to put to greater heights their social consciousness and
moral values concerning their responsibilities to the people they serve. It has always been our goal to increase our output by deciding
expeditiously and judiciously all cases filed with the Court, thus reducing backlog despite the limited resources granted to the Court.
KEY RESULT AREAS
Just and lasting peace and the rule of law
SECTOR OUTCOME
Rule of law
ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME
Judgment of cases independently, effectively and efficiently rendered
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
KEY STRATEGIES
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Expeditious and judicious decision of appealed cases and other cases under its jurisdiction
ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES (OOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) BASELINE 2016 TARGETS
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Judgment of cases independently, effectively and efficiently
rendered
MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS (MFOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) 2016 Targets
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
MFO 1: RESOLUTIONS/DECISIONS IN APPEALED AND OTHER CASES UNDER ITS JURISDICTION
No. of cases received/handled 33,981
No. of cases disposed 14,520
Disposition rate 43%
591OFFICIAL GAZETTETHE JUDICIARYGENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016
Vol. 111, No. 1 December 29, 2015
