Pepper Response to Sandea

18
Pepper Response to Sandea A. Stanley Culpepper Keith Rucker And Tim Flanders The University of Georgia

description

Pepper Response to Sandea. A. Stanley Culpepper Keith Rucker And Tim Flanders The University of Georgia. OBJECTIVE. Determine pepper tolerance to Sandea applied precision-directed, topical, or under plastic. Treatments Under plastic. 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 ounces Sandea per Acre - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Pepper Response to Sandea

Page 1: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Response to Sandea

A. Stanley Culpepper

Keith Rucker

And

Tim Flanders

The University of Georgia

Page 2: Pepper Response to Sandea

OBJECTIVE

Determine pepper tolerance to Sandea applied precision-directed, topical, or under plastic.

Page 3: Pepper Response to Sandea

TreatmentsUnder plastic

• 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 ounces Sandea per Acre

• 4 replications per treatment

* All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume

Page 4: Pepper Response to Sandea

TreatmentsOver-the-Top and Directed

• 0.5 ounces Sandea per Acre

• 4 replications per treatment

* All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume

Page 5: Pepper Response to Sandea

Application Information

• Plots = 6 ft. by 15 ft.

• 20 or 14.8 GPA spray solution

• Directed treatments precision applied to lower 25% of plant canopy

• Injury ratings measured

• Three harvest dates

Page 6: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

20

40

60

0.5 oz/A directed 0.5 oz/A topical

% in

jury

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Postemergence. 14 DAT.

Page 7: Pepper Response to Sandea

Sandea (0.5 oz/A) topical

Non-treated

Page 8: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2.

a

b

Page 9: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

200

400

600

800

1000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 3.

b

ab

Page 10: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

600

1200

1800

2400

3000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Total Harvest.

ab

b

Page 11: Pepper Response to Sandea
Page 12: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Under Plastic. 6 WAP, 8 WAT.

0

10

20

30

40

0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

% in

jury

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

ab

b

Page 13: Pepper Response to Sandea

Non-treated Sandea (0.5 oz/A)

applied under plastic

Page 14: Pepper Response to Sandea

Non-treated Sandea (1.0 oz/A)

applied under plastic

Page 15: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2.

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

aa a

b

Page 16: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 3.

0

300

600

900

1200

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

aa a

b

abb

a

Page 17: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Total Yield.

0

600

1200

1800

2400

3000

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

Page 18: Pepper Response to Sandea

Conclusions

• Pepper tolerance to topical Sandea applications is unacceptable.

• Directed applications most likely unacceptable.

• Additional research focusing on Sandea under plastic is needed but tolerance and

nutsedge control is questionable.