LANUZA MPA PRIDE CAMPAIGN PROJECT PLAN

Campaign Project Plan Table of Contents(Once the project plan is complete insert page numbers for each section)

A. Executive Summary 1. Introduction - Framing the problem 2. Campaign Theory of Change: a strategy for change - Table and narrative3. Site summary4. Project team & key strategic partners

B. Social marketing profile 1. Formative Research - TWG & Stakeholder meetings consensus workshop outputs; Directed Conversations; FGD; Photo voice2. Concept Model 3. Results Chain 4. Establishing a baseline: quantitative survey 5. Understanding our audience

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)1. Abstract2. Introduction3. Objectives4. MPA profile5. Action plan6. Funding opportunities

D. Monitoring plan (In excel) SMART objectives for:KAPBR,BC,TRCR

E. Work Plan with Budget (In excel)

F. Endorsement of this plan

2

G. References and Acknowledgements

H. Appendices1. Fisheries profile2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom3. Survey Questionnaire 4. Survey results5. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating 6. Letters of Support 7. Threat ranking8. Factor chain

3

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction - Framing the problem

Philippines as the centre of the centre of global marine biodiversityScientists refer to the 7,107 islands that make up the Philippines as the “center of the center” of global marine biodiversity. Its waters are home to whales, dolphins, 50 species of sea horses and over 2,000 species fish, including the largest fish in the world, the whale shark. Marine resources are also critical to the food security and livelihoods of Filipinos, as fish provide over 50% of their protein and support the livelihoods of millions of fishers and fish-related industries throughout the country. The Philippines is located in the Coral Triangle, a vast region in Southeast Asia made up of 18,500 islands and 647 million hectares of ocean. It is often referred to as the “nursery of the seas” because of the more than 500 species of coral and hundreds of thousands of hectares of sea grass and coastal mangrove forests that shelter and sustain a level of marine diversity unmatched anywhere on the planet.

Species and Habitat under Complex ThreatsToday, however the global center of marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure. Over 40% of the reef and mangroves in the region have disappeared in the last 40 years. Near-shore overfishing is a serious threat to these natural resources, and reversing the effects will require a significant change in human behavior. Less than five percent of the Philippines’ coral reef ecosystems are still in pristine health, and in some fishing grounds, biomass is less than 10% of what it was 50 years ago. Most near-shore fishing is conducted by subsistence fishers in coastal communities although illegal intrusions by commercial fishers into municipal waters are cause for concern.

A Campaign to Transform the ContextDeveloping local approaches to addressing the threat of overfishing is increasingly recognized as vital to long-term economic and environmental sustainability in the region. The vision behind this plan, and the current cohort of 12 campaign developed under the Rare Pride Program in the Philippines, is to facilitate true community buy and ownership of the local Marine Protected Areas building on the tools developed in 20 years of experience in MPA management in the Philippines and combining it with the Rare Pride Methodology for social marketing. Through this strategy the objective is to get the local fishers population as well as the wider community in the Barangays surrounding the MPA to take ownership in and understand the benefit of no-take-areas and support essential management activities such as enforcement and governance of the MPA.

4

Cohort Theory of change: a strategy for changeIn order to eliminate the principal threat of overfishing and destructive fishing, the governance and enforcement infrastructures of the no-take-zone (NTZ) at 12 sites in the Philippines will be strengthened via a proven self-assessment and planning tool, the Participatory Coastal Resources Assessment tool (PCRA). Key target audiences (local fishers and gleaners; the local community, the MPA enforcement team and local LGU officials) will be informed of the benefits of the No Take Zone (NTZ), the rules of the sanctuary, and the processes for becoming more engaged in the MPA management committee. Fishers and gleaners will come to believe in MPA as a tool for food security, and will support new reporting structures for arrests and prosecution of intruders. The conservation results will include increased perceived fish catch, increases in fish numbers and species richness, increase in invertebrates, and increase in coral reef health.

5

2. Lanuza MPA Campaign Theory of Change

Theory of Change formula:

K + A + IC + BR BC TR CRLocal communities, fishers and MPA managers/BDC Members know the importance of MPA and benefits they get, its rules and regulations that governs with it.

Local fishers and gleaners along the coastline know the existence of MPA and recognize the benefits of a well-enforced MPA by increasing fish catch due to spillover effect. They are aware of the need for people to report intruders to get those benefits.

LGU Officials & Employees increased in knowledge good giovernance & management of MPA will give benefits

Local communities believe the importance of the MPA establishment and the MPA rules and regulations should be implemented

Local community fishers and gleaners believe on the importance of the MPA in ensuring sustainable fish catch and believe it is important to follow the MPA rules and regulations

Community residents along the coastline believe that MPA is not a obstacle to their livelihood but instead helping them to catch more fish. They will believe they have a role to play in reporting intruders.

LGU Officials & Employees believed that good governance and management of MPA will sustained the marine respources

Local communities discuss among among themselves about the purpose of the MPA establishment and the benefits of following MPA rules and regulations.Fishers and gleanersin the community start discussing to each other about the benefits of MPA and need to follow MPA rules and regulations

Community residents are talking to each other about the roles of reporting any intruders in the MPA.

LGU Officials & Employees discuss to each other to help improved the governance of MPA

Local communities create and maintain MPA management and enforcement activities.

Local fishers and gleaners are capacitated with knowledge on how to enforce and govern the MPA.

Establishment of surveillance and reporting system for community residents to report illegal activities in the MPA.

LGU officials & employees will attend meetings, seminars, trainings in MPA governance & enforcement

Local communities follow the organizational structure, ordinance, policies and regulations that govern the Lanuza MPA

Local community fishers and gleaners actively participate in patrolling and implementation of fishery laws and MPA rules and regulations.

Community residents will become vigilant in by reporting any activities that happen within the MPA.

LGU officials & employees will help promote the MPA activities and campaign headed for sustainable fishing through the benefits gain of having MPA

Community will be empowered and help in managing the sanctuary and enforce the laws.

Fishers and gleaners will join in the management and enforcement of MPA rules and regulations.

Fishers will now part of the management and enforcement by stopping intruding in the MPA

In two years, there will be an increase in biodiversity richness within Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary (LMPS)

Specifically:

a. a 2% increase on the live hard coral cover, and

b. 5% increase of fish biomass and invertebrates

6

Theory of Change narrative:

In achieving the reduction of intrusion in the No-Take-Zone (NTZ) of Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary, the enforcement of MPA rules and regulations need to be strengthen at different levels and participated by the LGU officials & employees, community residents, fishers and gleaners. The governance and management committee will be strengthened and will take active part in MPA assessment, management & implement rules and regulation . Community residents will be mobilized and informed of the benefits of having the MPA and its rules and regulation. Surveillance and reporting mechanisms to MPA managers will be established to involve community support in eliminating intrusions within the no-take-zone and reducing infractions of prohibited fishing and gleaning activities within the Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary area.

3. Site summary(This section corresponds to the site summary created during the first University Phase. Please revise it, noting that a few minor changes have been made to the information required, and insert it here)Project Name

Project Name LANUZA MARINE PARK AND SANCTUARY PRIDE CAMPAIGN

Project Data Effective Date June 12, 2011 Project Scope and Vision

Scope/Site Name LANUZA MARINE PARK & SANCTUARY

Scope/Site Description Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary is located in Barangay Sibahay, 6 kilometers from Poblacion Lanuza, bounded on the north by the Pacific Ocean and in south by Municipality of Cortes, on the east by Barangay Nurcia and on the west by Barangay Habag. It is a 20 minute ride from the town proper by jeep, bus, and hired motorcycle. It is along the national highway and has a total land area of 451.23 has, composed of 7 puroks (villages) and has a population of 956 with 174 households (NSO 2006).

The Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary (LMPS) has a total area of 111 hectares with 58 hectares as No take zone and 53 hectares as the buffer zone. LMPS is facing the Pacific Ocean and exposed to strong winds during the northeast monsoon. It is a fringing reef and has extensive intertidal reef flat covered by Sargassum beds (samo). The reef crest has an average depth of 40 feet and the reef slope has an angle of approximately 10 to 15 degrees.

7

After so many years of existence, LMPS increased the stocks of fishes that being threatened by the intrusion of illegal fishers using spear-gun and modified flashlight with the aid of compressor from other municipalities. Also gleaners from within the community within sanctuary glean for fish, shells and other invertebrates. The fishers in the community encroached of the sanctuary for high valued commercial target species of lobster locally referred as banagan (Panulirus homarus) Surgeon Fish referred to as Gangis (Naso unicornis). They catch this to augment the income in order to support the basic needs of the family. Hook and line and gill nets are the most commonly used gears in fishing.

The people living in the area are not totally dependent on the fishing activity since there are times that the weather is not good, so they opted to plant root crops, vegetables, etc. in the mountain. People living near the area have different attitudes towards conservation especially the establishment of the sanctuary since it will affect their livelihood.

Vision Statement Text Lanuza, a healthy& sustainably managed environment that promotes eco-tourism and enhances agri-fishery productivity that makes a self-sufficient, God Fearing and Peaceful Community in CARAGA Region, wherein people have equitable access to the basic services, enjoying a better quality of life through a transparent administration of the Local economy that is propelled by upright and committed leaders with the active participation of the empowered citizenry

Biodiversity Features

Biodiversity Area The Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary Pride Campaign site is a fringing reef covering 111 hectares divided into two zones: Buffer Zone of 58 has. and No Take Zone of 53 has.

8

Biodiversity Background Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary is an extensive intertidal reef flat that is covered by sargassum and has an average depth of 40 feet.

Survey done in 2008 reveal that the live coral cover within the no take zone (NTZ) is 62.27% while dead coral is 18.67%.and the algal and abiotic cover was 7.83% and 4.21% respectively.

Fig. 1 Percent cover of the different benthic lifeforms of the LMPS

There are 42 reef fish species belonging to 17 families observed during the April 2008 monitoring. Chart below (Fig. 2) shows the relative frequency of the different fish families observed during the monitoring. Family Pomacentridae or the damselfishes ( palata) had the highest frequency in the transects with 45.96%. This was followed by Family Engraulidae or the Anchovies(bolinao/dilis) with 11.03% and Family Labridae or the Wrasses (labayan) with 9.56%.

9

Fig. 2 Relative

frequency of the different fish families

Figure 3. Kind of fishes found in Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary

The relative frequency of the three fish species categories is shown below (Fig. 3). The demersal species category is the highest with 61.76%. This is followed by the target species category with 30.51%. The indicator species category is the lowest frequency with 7.72%.

Endangered Species:

Family English Name Local nameTarget/commercially importantSiganidae Rabbit fish Budas

Rabbit fish TagbagoScaridae Parrot fish Molmol/bontogLutjanidae Snappers Maya-mayaKyphosidae Drummers DanoHolocentridae Soldierfish BagaLethrinidae Emperors KatambakCarangidae Jacks LangogSerranidae Grouper Lapu-lapuAcanthuridae Surgeon fish Gangis/mongitLabridae Wrasses Maming/labayanCaesionidae Fusilliers LilaBarracuda Ray-finned fish RompeIndicator fishesChaetodontidae Butterflyfishes AlibangbangPomacantidae Angelfishes

10

Endangered species that are found in the coastal area of Lanuza and MPA area include pawikan marine sea turtles (Chelonioidea), takyobo giant clam (Tridacna gigas), manta ray (Manta birostris) and napoleon wrasse (Cheilinus undulates).

Protected Area Information

Protected Area Categories Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary was established in 1999 and managed by Municipal Fisheries Aquatic Resources Management Council (MFARMC). In 2002, its management was turned over to a people’s organization (PO) – Kapunongan sa Lanuzanhong Mananagat (KaLMa) in Sitio Cagmino, Sibahay where the MPA located. This turn over was legalized under the Municipal Ordinance

11

No. 9, Series of 2002. At first, KaLMa was eager to manage the MPA primarily motivated by the LGU incentive for MPA guards of 120.00/day. KaLMa managed it well until such time that PO membership got unsatisfied with their leaders; few of the PO leaders reportedly encroached the MPA. In 2007, the MPA was mismanaged and gone disarrayed so that the LGU of Lanuza took over the management of the MPA. Since then, the MPA was managed by the LGU of Lanuza specifically the Municipal Agriculture Office.

Legal Status The Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary was established in September 1999 through Municipal Ordinance No. 122. It covers a total area of 155.5 hectares within the jurisdictions of Barangay Sibahay, Nurcia and Habag.

The MPA size was reduced to 111 hectares MPA through Municipal Ordinance No. 9 series of 2002. An amendment is undergoing since its incorporation to the Comprehensive Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Ordinance (CFARMO).

Republic Act 8550, otherwise known as the Fisheries Code of the Philippines provides the legal basis for the MPA establishment and management. It is also empowers the local government units and the local communities to oversee and implement fisheries and coastal resources management.

Management of upland areas especially the forest areas near the MPA follows the Forest use Plan under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the municipality of Lanuza.

Legislative Context The current MPA is created by two local ordinances. These are:

Ordinance No. 9, series 2002 An ordinance establishing and regulating the utilization of the Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary and adopting community - based resource management as an approach to participatory management, and

Ordinance No. 4, series 2008 An ordinance delineating the boundaries of the municipal waters of the Municipality of Lanuza, Surigao del Sur.

Physical Description The park is part of the Lanuza Bay (between N8O45' - 9O30'; E125O45' - 126O15') located at the northwestern seaboard of Mindanao in the province of Surigao del Sur. The bay is bounded by six municipalities namely, Carrascal, Cantillan, Madrid, Carmen, Lanuza and Cortes and Tandag.

The estimated total land area covered by the municipalities of Lanuza Bay including Tandag 161,065.16 hectares. The marine resources of LBDA member municipalities (except Carmen which does not have any municipal waters) covers an estimated

12

127,324.98 hectares of unified municipal waters with an estimated total coastal length of about 120.5 kilometers.

Biological Description The Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary is facing the Pacific ocean and its back are the mountains of Hilong-hilong Range. The coral reef has more than 50% live coral cover and it has fringing reef. Its crest is 40 feet average depth and the reef slope has an angle approximately of 10 to 15 degrees.

The life history of the MPA is affected by the changes in the rivers and tributaries that feed to Lanuza Bay. The rainy season between the months of November to March brings sediments and debris that affect the turbidity and marine life while the dry season during the months of April to October are suitable for coral growth and marine recruitments.

The MPA is a host to the two species of sea turtle (hawksbill and green sea turtles) and three species of giant clams (boring, fluted, small giant clams).

Annual MPA assessments was conducted by Haribon Foundation from 2002 until 2009 reveal that the MPA has been gradually recovering and have been recorded to have the highest coral covers among the MPAs established in the Lanuza Bay area.

13

Figure 4. Percentage cover of the live corals of the fish sanctuaries from 2002 to 2008 in the Municipality of Lanuza, Surigao del Sur (Haribon, 2008)

Reef fish abundance however had been fluctuating throughout the years. Fluctuations of the live coral cover may be due to a number of factors such as sediment loading and decrease in water quality of the area. Deforestation is one of the main cause of sedimentation in the area (Lavides et al 2005). It has been studied that sediment loading decreases water quality and lessens the amount of light penetration, affecting survival of coral polyps (Haribon, 2008).

14

Figure . Percentage cover of the live corals of the fish sanctuaries from 2002 to 2008 in the Municipality of Lanuza, Surigao del Sur (Haribon, 2008)

Socio-Economic Information Of its total land area of 32,271.16 hectares, only 10.39% or 3,354 hectares are being utilized for agricultural purposes; 22.90 hectares are timber land; residential and institutional areas comprise .067% or 21.90 hectares. Commercial areas have the lowest percentage at 0.058% or 1.90 hectares while unclassified public forest covers 27,140 hectares (LGSP, 2004).

The socio-economic activities of the communities living within and adjacent to the MPA are focused mainly on fishing, farming and waged labor. There are two types of fishers and gleaners - fulltime and part time fishers.

Farming is categorized as either lowland or upland. Lowland farmers plant cash crops and staples - rice, corn and other high valued commercial crops.

15

The wage laborers usually earn more than a Php150.00 for cultivating other people’s land or construction work.

Historical Description In 1995, Lanuza Mayor Algerico Irizari M.D. launched the Lanuza Sagip Karagatan Program (Save Lanuza Waters) as flagship coastal conservation program in his first term of office. The program focused on eradicating commercial fishers within the town, from neighboring towns and other illegal fishers who are using dynamite, cyanide and other destructive fishing practices. The program was Mayor Irizari’s response to the dwindling fish catch in Lanuza. In September 1998, with the help of Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and Volunteer Services Overseas volunteer Coleen Hicks, an assessment of Lanuza coastal waters was conducted to come up with recommendations to help the fishing communities in achieving higher fish catch. Also, it was in the Local Government Code mandated the LGU to preserve, conserve and protect their resources.

The marine sanctuary was officially declared on 1999 under the Municipal Ordinance No. 122-99, covering a 155 hectare area (Lavides, et al., 2005). It is being managed by the people's organization (PO) Kapunungan ng Lanuzanhong Mananagat (KALMA), organized in 1998. Among their projects were the construction of a guardhouse and marker buoys (Haribon-PAMANA Ka Sa Pilipinas, 2005). Their activities include annual bio-physical monitoring and enforcement with the Bantay Dagat of the sanctuary.

Cultural Description Roman Catholics account for majority of the population. The annual fiesta celebration of Baragay Sibahay is held every May 15-16 in honor of St. Isidore Labrador patron of patron of farmers, peasants, day laborers, and rural communities. Holy week and other Roman Catholic celebrations are also widely celebrated.

The Mamanwa tribes live in Hilong-hilong Mountain Range; a small Mamanwa community is settled in Brgy. adjacent to the MPA. The two tribes unite to form the indigenous people federation called KATRIMMA. In 2009, a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title covering close to 11,765 hectares in the 3 towns including Lanuza was awarded by the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) to KATRIMMA. About 50% of the KATRIMMA ancestral domain is part of the Mt. Hilong–Hilong Range.

Access Information The site is accessible national highway connecting Cantilan to Tandag. The MPA can be accessed any means of transport - motorcycle, tricycle, buses, jeepney and van.

Visitation Information The MPA sanctuary is visibly seen because of the Sanctuary café outside the area. It offers a rest and recreational area for travelers and tourists. Swimming and snorkeling are allowed in the MPA buffer area. Also it is near to one of the eco destination of Lanuza - the Magkawas falls. More details about the site can be directly addressed through the Municipal Tourism Officer or CRM Coordinator.

16

Current uses of the MPA and adjacent coastline

The area is mountainous area and forest land is diverse. Some of it is planted with banana, exotic species of trees, fruit trees, coconuts and vegetables. Also it is under the Integrated Social Forestry agreement between the DENR and the people. Recently the DENR approved the application of Integrated Forest Management Agreement (IFMA) between Ventura timber Company and now they are starting operating the area.

. LAND USES

LAND USE CATEGORY LAND AREA (HAS)

a. Residential 2.0995b. Commercial 29.73c. Industrial 5.51d. Institutional 1.89e. Agricultural - Irrigated - Non- Irrigated 12 has.f. Crop Land 100 has.g. Open Space 300 has.h. Other Use

Management Resources The management structure presently is the LGU who take over since re-organization of the community will be re-established. But the Barangay council also takes part in enforcing the law by letting their barangay tanod manage the site as guards in the MPA.

The site is assisted by German Development Services(DED), Lanuza Bay Development Alliance (LBDA), HARIBON Foundation and Advocates for Policy Reforms Development of Caraga, Inc. (APREDEC)

IUCN Red-list Species

Red-List Species The endangered species that found in the site are pawikan, sea turtles (Chelonioidea), takyobo, giant clams (Tridacna gigas), Napoleon wrasse (cheilinus undulates),Bump head parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum).

17

Other Notable Species

Other Notable Species Tridacna sp. (giant clam) lobster (Panulirus homanus) Grouper (serranidae), Rabbit fishes (Siganidae), Parrot fish (Scaridae), Snapper (Lutjanidae ),Emperors ( Lethrinidae ), Caranx (Carangidae ), Fusillier ( Caesionidae ), Sweetlips (Haemulidae),wrasses (labirdae), tuna (Scombridae), mackerel , blue marlin (Makaira nigricans).

Location and Topography

MPA Latitude 09°020’ North

MPA Longitude 126°006’ East

Country Philippines

States/Provinces Surigao del Sur

Municipalities Lanuza

Legislative Districts First District

Location Details Lanuza MPA is located in Sitio Cagmino of Barangay Sibahay facing the Pacific Ocean. Fishing is the main source of income but most of the fisherfolk are also in agriculture after fishing in the morning.

18

Site Map Reference

Comments 09°020’ North

Human Stakeholders

Human Stakeholder Population Size After identifying who are the target audience for the Pride campaign the stakeholders include the two adjacent barangaysof Habag and Nurcia and main target site- Brgy. Sibahay. These communities have the following population:

Barangay

Sibahay - 958 331

19

Nurcia - 1,059 418Habag - 660 351

Social Context Most residents speak Surigaonon. Roman Catholic is the dominant religion. Most of the people living in the Brgy. Sibahay are not depending on fishing alone but the adjacent villages of Habag and Nurcia are. Presently, there are 17.1% of the respondents in the three barangays said fishing is their main livelihood.

Rare Pride Campaign

Threats addressed by campaign Intrusion of Spear Fishing by aid of compressor and Ring Nets (Lobster)Other threats at site Danish Siene (Liba-liba)Number of communities in campaign area

Barangay Habag, Sibahay, Nurcia (3 communities)

Target Audiences FisherfolksBarangay Development Council (BDC)CommunitiesLGU Officials & Employees

Biodiversity area (ha) Core Zone – 58 hasBuffer Zone – 53 hasTotal area – 111 has

Habitat Coral ReefBiodiversity hotspot(s) Coral triangleFlagship species common name Rock Lobster “Banagan”Flagship species scientific name Panulirus homanus

20

Flagship species details (<200 words)

The flagship species is the preferred species according to the KAP survey. They choose because of the tasteand economic value of the specie. Also, there are more than 2 species can be found in the area where the MPA is located. So, communities in the 3 barangays mostly choose that specie to be the flagship.

Campaign ambassadorCohort ambassador

21

4. Project team and stakeholders

Lead Agency and Pride Conservation Fellow

#Name Position Organization Contact details Role in relation to campaign

1 Salvacion S. Azarcon Municipal Mayor LGU Lanuza 09208327717 LAP/ OC Chairman

2 Boromeo C. Micabalo Municipal Agriculturist Municipal Agriculture 09108224640 Supervisor

3 Marybeth A. Rita Aqua-I Municipal Agriculture 09485225094 Conservation Fellow (CF)

4 Welly A. Medina Clerk III Municipal Mayor 09215920312 Alternate CF

5 Lorna M. Cubero HRMO/PESO Manager Municipal Mayor 09213785591 Alternate CF

6 Salve Regina Rosario S. Azarcon Private Secretary Municipal Mayor 09087615967 Alternate CF

Strategic partners/key stakeholders

#Name Position Organization Contact details Role in relation to campaign

1 Algerico H. Irizari, M.D. Municipal Vice Mayor Sangguniang Bayan 09202951935 OC Vice Chairman

2 Richard F. Arreza SBM - Comm. Chair on Environment Sangguniang Bayan Oversight Committee Member (Policy)

3 Flordeliz C. Urquiza Dep-Ed FHINHS(High School) Education

4 Teresita F. Fuerte Dep-Ed LCES(Elementary) Education

22

5 Ramer P. Silvano Barangay Captain BLGU Sibahay 09086528550 Oversight Committee Member (Policy)

6 Edmond R. Jumalon Barangay Captain BLGU Nurcia Oversight Committee Member (Policy)

7 Leony P. Lipao Barangay Captain BLGU Habag Oversight Committee Member (Policy)

8 Mary Plaza School Principal Dep -Ed Education

9 Roberto Aguhob Chairman MFARMC Oversight Committee Member (Policy)

10 Richard F. Arreza Comm. Chair on Environment SB Member Policy

11 Ranulfo M. arreza LGU MENRO OC Member

12 Mr. Vicente Mahinay Chairman Fisherfolks Asso. Of Nurcia ManCom Member

13 Mr. Godofredo Urbiztondo Chairman Sibahay fisherfolk Association OC Member

During the planning phase of the campaign a Technical Working Group (TWG) and a management Committee (ManCom) were formed/ strengthened to help support the governance and management of the MPA. Please refer to the MPA Governance and Management Plan (Section C of this document) for further details and composition of these two bodies.

23

B. SOCIAL MARKETING PROFILEThe planning work conducted was ground-truthed with a range of key stakeholders and experts through stakeholder meetings, focus group discussions and one-on-one interviews. These helped to build a composite portrait of the campaign target audiences, and design the quantitative survey (Section B4 and Appendix H) which was subsequently carried out across the campaign target area. The quantitative survey will both help us understand our primary audiences and allow us to establish a baseline for measuring change after the Pride campaign.

The formative research section below aims to provide a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs. The sequences in which the results of the formative research are presented here do not necessarily correspond to the chronology in which the data was collected, and in some cases, multiple iterations of the research, such as directed conversations with target audiences, were required.

1. Formative researchDirected Conversation with one of the Oldest Fisherfolk who is still go into fishing

A meeting was held at the residence of Mr. Alberto Balili at Barangay Nurcia, Lanuza and was asked: What is the situation of our fisheries at present? What are the causes of declining fish catch? What do you think of MPA that being establish, does it help the people? What do you think the main problem of our sanctuary? Do you have any suggestion to improve the management of the sanctuary?

Mano Belto as we call him is former a Barangay Captain of Barangay Nurcia and since 1960 he involve in fishing as his source of income to augment the families need. He said that situation now in fisheries is threatening to small fishers because of coming in of commercial fishing in the municipal waters and also a lot of new gears that being introduced. Not like before that hook and line and gill net were used in catching fish. Before also I can’t compare the kls of catch “ kay tinuhog man ang isda” but now its in kilos now. He said that causing less catch is encroaching of Danish Siene or Libaliba, Surit and basinig and Pangabog. Also, the increase of fishers cause the overfishing. The establishment of MPA gives the people hope to increase the catch , unfortunately the enforcement is not good. The Bantay Dagat now is Bantay Dawat, means that they are easily bribe by illegal fishers. That’s really the main problem of our sanctuary, Enforcement and also the people who once manage it are the one also that encroach the area. We must “hugtan ang balaod” and our sanctuary will be managed by the people that are dedicated to help the resources return to its natural way like before in 1960’s. Also, communities from nearby barangay help in reporting any fishers that are not within the municipality.

24

Directed conversation with Dante Limpot (Former PO Chairman)

He discussed the development of Lanuza MPA since it was establish in 1998. Dante was once part of the group that manage the MPA since the beginning. In 1998, Kapunungan ng mga Lanuzanhong Mananagat (KALMA) was organized and manage the MPA composes of fishers from different barangays. They take turns in guarding the MPA until in 2001, an organization which called KALMA Cagmino was organized. The POs now managed the MPA and legalized it thru an ordinance # 9, series of 2002. The PO compose of fishers from Sitio Cagmino, Badyang of Barangay Sibahay and Sitio Cabanahan of Barangay Nurcia. They manage the MPA until 2006 when the chairman turn over to the LGU because of the problem that some members are the one encroaching the NTZ. There are faction that arise within the group that they decided to let the LGU manage the MPA. In the enforcement, a lot apprehended and some of them pleaded guilty during the hearing of cases. Encroachers are from other municipality using spear with the aid of compressor.

FGD during the stakeholders meetings to gather the perception of stakeholders of establishing Marine Protected Area. A consensus workshop conducted:

Question: What is the purpose of Marine Protected Area (MPA)?Answers: A place for fish and other marine species Breeding Place, protection of corals, protection of environment

Question: What could be the benefits of having an MPA? Answers: plenty of fishes, Nursery of fishes, progressive barangay, help fishers in catch, low price of fish

Questions: What can we do to increase the benefits of having an MPA?Answers: Strict enforcement, don’t catch during spawning period, don’t throw garbage in the sea, educate people about MPA, community participation

25

2. Concept Models

All Rare Pride campaigns start with building a concept model, which is a tool for visually depicting the situation at the project site. Through validation with several stakeholders and marine experts like the oversight committee the following concept model was developed illustrating the conservation target, indirect threats and contributing factors at Lanuza Marine park & Sanctuary The model was created using the Miradi software. Miradi is being developed to assist conservation practitioners going through the adaptive management process outlined in the Conservation Measures Partnership's Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation (www.miradi.org). It entails a standardized nomenclature and threat taxonomy developed by the IUCN. The following chart is what the Lanuza concept model looks like once all of the direct and contributing factors to the Lanuza MPA have been inputted. The connecting arrows highlight the relationship between the factors and how they impact different targets in the Lanuza MPA NTZ.

The Concept Model of Lanuza MPA looks like a mesh of a net that a lot of factors either direct or indirect that contribute to the threats that Lanuza NTZ is facing at present.The arrows show the interconnectivity of each contributing factor that affecting the management of Lanuza MPA since it was established in 1998. Most threats in NTZ attributed by human activities both in Marine & Upland. The Conservation results that Lanuza MPA aiming to increase fish abundance, live coral cover and invertebrates even in small percentage to helps people economically, support the basic needs of the family and sustain the fishing activity around the municipal waters .

Two Major threats that being identified in the NTZ is encroaching of spear fishers using modified flashlight and compressor fishing using cyanide from other municipalities. Also, outside the MPA is the commercial fishing called LIba-liba encroaching and the siltation caused by illegal logging in the upland. But the main problem is the encroachers within the NTZ. The poor governance and management of the Lanuza MPA causes this threat especially in enforcing the Laws. The Bantay Dagat are easily bribed by the illegal fishers because they are not committed with their job.

26

27

3. Results ChainResults chains clearly and concisely lay out the expected sequence of results that the campaign is expected to create all along our Theory of Change for each of our target audiences. It is generally recognized that before adopting a new behavior a person moves through a series of stages. These stages can be summarized as pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, validation, action, and maintenance. Not all individuals in a target segment will be in the same stage of behavior change, so activities and messages will need to be tailored to the different stages at which the target audiences are. Understanding the steps in our results chain has also helped narrow down our preliminary objectives for each target audience before we begin collecting data.

The basis for building the above results chains was the concept model illustrated in section B2 as well as the threat ranking and factor chains included that were subsequently developed in consultation with partners and stakeholders ( see Appendix H7 and H8). The threat ranking helped identify the priority threat to be addressed by the campaign, based on scope, severity and irreversibility of the threat at the site. The factor chains subsequently served to illustrate the causal sequence of factors that lie behind the primary threat and the target groups that the campaign needs to reach to address the threat. The result chains illustrate the results required to achieve the campaign’s desired goals and aim to constitute a road map for changes the campaign would like to bring about for each target audience. The result chains were also used as a foundation for developing the campaign quantitative survey and obtaining the information1 that would be required to design effective social marketing and behavior change interventions for the campaign.

The social marketing campaign will focus on the primary target audiences as shown in the results chains. The secondary audiences will be reached either indirectly through the campaign or through specific activities such as Barrier removal activities and targeted meetings and workshops rather than through the marketing campaign.

1

28

TA 1 - FISHERS The first target audience of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary pride campaign are fishers of three barangays that along the coastline. The desired behavior change is to stop intrusion within the 58 has NTZ of MPA.

29

TA 2 – Community Residents

The desired behavioral for this target audience is also an active involvement of community in reporting any activities that happens in the NTZ. Also, help in ensuring that MPA rules & regulation implement well.

30

TA 3 – BDC

The behavioral change that this target audience wants to aim is an active involvement in the governance and enforcement of the MPA. The behavior that will help the fishers increase their catch.

31

TA 4 – LGU

Help in promoting the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary different activities to family & friends is the behavioral change that LGU Officials and employees wants to achieve. Also, ensure that the policy made by the management committee is helping the community people in sustaining their livelihood. Also, promote the MPA as eco-tourism site that can augment the communities needs such as infrastructure, labor, and income.

32

4. Establishing a Baseline: Quantitative surveyAfter conducting qualitative research the LAP conducted a quantitative survey of adults living in Lanuza MPA. This pre-campaign survey was conducted in March 2010 to gain a better understanding of the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the target audiences in relation to the MPA and desired behavior changes as well as to establish a baseline for measuring the impact of the campaign on these audiences through the campaign. The results from the KAP survey are the basis for the creation of SMART objectives relating to the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) components of the campaign’s Theory-of-Change (ToC).

A second post campaign survey will be conducted at the end of one year of the campaign activities being implemented in May 2009 to measure any change in these KAP variables in order to assess the level of attainment of the SMART objectives. A full description of the results can be found in the Project Plan Appendix F4.

The following table summarizes the number of people interviewed and the geographical distribution of the survey.

Geographic scope of survey

The three barangays that survey conducted are adjacent to one another. They are the barangays that lies facing pacific ocean and most of them are getting resources in the marine seas. The nearest barangay to Poblacion is barangay Habag and its just 1 km away while the farthest one is the barangay Nurcia and it is 10 kms away from the town proper. There are three target audiences.

Survey target audiences and sample size

N of people Desired behavior change Sample size at95%CL and 3%CI

Sample size at95%CL and 5%CI

Final sample size choice

TA 1 Fisherfolks (169) 1. Habag - 722. Sibahay - 303. Nuurcia - 67

Stop Intrusion in the NTZ (Fishing & Gleaning)

169

TA 2 Barangay LGU/Barangay Development Council (100) (MPA Managers)

1. Habag – 322. Sibahay –283. Nurcia – 32

Participate in day to day operation of the MPA which include attendance in regular meetings, reef assessment and making sure financial and human resources are available.

92

33

TA 3 Community of 3 barangays (2,776)1. Habag - 6872. Sibahay - 9633. Nurcia - 1,126

Involvement in the reporting to MPA managers and surveillance of intrusion in the NTZ

418506548

247275287

247273319809

TA 4 LGU Employees (100)- Local Employees Taking part in promoting MPA and campaign related activities

Total 1,140 670 1,170

34

Sampling methodology

TA1 - FISHERS TA2 - BDC TA3 - COMMUNITIES TA4 - LGU

Stratified sampling

Geographic scope of survey

N of people in listed locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

N of TA in locality

% of total TA in locality

sample size for TA in locality

HABAG 687 72 32 247 100

SIBAHAY 963 30 28 273NURCIA 1,126 67 32 319TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100%

Respondent selection method

Three enumerator’s will be in-charge with fishers in order to avoid interviewing the same respondent. In addition, fishers interviewed at fisherfolks hang outList of Fishermen from the registry of Fisherfolks taken from MAO

Enumerators are volunteers from the Barangay

Three enumerators will conduct the survey in the communities of the 3 barangays Listing of MPA Managers will be provided by the CF (Oppurtunistic)

Enumerators are volunteers from the Barangay

Random sampling through house to house interviews. Area was divided into grids for random street selection.15 and above will be taken as respondents from the Mayor’s Office & Validate it with COMELEC. Add Barangay sketch map

Enumerators are volunteers from the Barangay

2 Enumerators from MAO Respondents should be interviewed one by one in a certain place with LCE’s Approval

35

Survey planning

Total survey sample size 1,170Time for enumerator to do one survey 1 hrN of hrs enumerator works a day 4 hrsN of surveys one enumerator can do a day 2N of enumerators available 32N of surveys done a day by total n of enumerators 60N of days needed to do survey 47Additional days needed for travel if any 3Dates for training of enumerators & final survey testing Mar. 16, 2011Beginning and end date of survey March 17, 2011N of people available to do data entry 2Beginning date of data entry April 5, 2011Date of completion of data entry May 20, 2011

36

K A IC BC0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

K A IC BC0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

TA 1 - FISHER TA 2 - COMMUNITY RESIDENTS

K A IC BC0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

K A IC BC0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

TA 3 - BDC TA 4 - LGU OFFICIALS & EMPLOYEES

Fisher is the first target audience are fishers from Barangay Sibahay, Habag & Nurcia and they are in the contemplation stage in the behavioral continuum, though knowledge (71%) is higher but the attitude is lower than 50% but talking to peers (55%) and 69% behavioral change. The second target audience is the community residents of 3 barangays. Also belong to contemplation stage shows more than 50% in knowledge, Interpersonal communication and behavioral change. (Both targets belong to primary audience)

This secondary audiences BDC and LGU employees under the pre-contemplation stage in which more than 50% in knowledge but the rest is less than 50%. It shows that attitude, interpersonal communication and behavioral change is need to establish.

37

Surgeon Fish

Grouper Lobster Giant Clam Parrot Fish

Snapper Rabbit Fish

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Fisher

Community

Tagalo

g Love

Melodies

Local New

s

National

News

Internati

onal New

s

Sports

(Surfing)

Religio

us Pro

grams

Drama

Puppet Sh

ow

Locally

Produced Video

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Fisher

Community

KAP survey shows the percentage of flagship specie chooses by the respondents. During validation of the data people of three barangays choose lobster although it in second choice. The specie is found more on the area were MPA established.

The primary target audiences prefers local news (TA1-43.6% TA2-56.4%) and national news (TA1-56.9% TA2-47.1%) as media programs they like to see or hear most.

38

Person O

n Radio

Person on Te

levisio

n

Law En

forcemen

t Officia

l(PNP. A

rmy)

National

Governmen

t (DEN

R, BFA

R, etc)

LGU O

fficials &

Employee

s

Religio

us Lea

ders

Frien

ds/Fam

ily m

embers

Teachers

Billboard

s/Poste

r

Printed

mate

rials

Public mee

tings

School P

rogra

m

Celebrity NGO

Bantay

Dagat

Baranga

y Council

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fisher Community

Fishers trusted sources of information chooses Public meetings and LGU Officials & employees (64.5%) as source and community chooses person on radio (51.9%) and Religious leaders (49.6%).

39

Understanding our audience

Insert a brief introduction listing your target audiences and their relevance to the campaign. (Reference p 68 of Serena & p84 of Lola)

TA1 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – FISHERS (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4What do we know about this group?

Fishers are high level in awareness on the NTZ based on the KAP survey conducted last April 2011. Fishers (58.6%) of them support the increase in enforcement so that intrusion within the NTZ will totally eradicated. Fishers are in the contemplation stage of behavior.

Knowledge Fishers in 3 barangays have high level of knowledge that MPA can help them in their livelihood based on the result of KAP survey 67 says that they gain benefits of having NTZ in the area

Attitude 51% of fishers "disagree" that fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear if MPA rules is not implemented in the NTZ.

PracticeThe fishers of three barangays practices fishing & gleaning near the MPA and only few are intruding the NTZ. Based on the record of the police & in the court 5 fishermen from Barangay Nurcia have paid penalty for entering the NTZ and 2 from Sitio Badiang, Sibahay litigated in court for fishing. But mostly the intruders are the fishers that living within the area where MPA is established.

Trusted sources Information from public meeting & LGU Officials & employees (65%) are most trustworthy as source of information and followed law enforcement officials (54%) based on the survey.

Media sources 47% Fisherfolks of Barangay Habag, Sibahay & Nurcia like most the national news based on the KAP survey conducted also, next is the local news which is 44%

Any other relevant information

60% of fisherfolks from 3 barangays like the establishment of MPA in the area. Most of them(69.2%) choose the lobster as the flagship specie based on the KAP survey conducted of its economic value and also it is found more in the NTZ. Fishers (70.7%) said that there is a benefit of establishing NTZ in the area.

Comments

40

TA2 – PRIMARY AUDIENCE – Local Community (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4

What do we know about this group?

The community residents of 3 barangays have high level of awareness. The 12 years of existence community residents didn’t report any activities in the no take zones. Most of them don’t care about the operation of the MPA. They don’t feel ownership because they think that they are not affected if there is decrease on the supply of fish in the community. Stage of behavior of the community in three barangays are high in knowledge but not too high in the attitude and they fall on the contemplation.

KnowledgeThree community residents have minimal level of knowledge in terms of MPA regulations. KAP survey results show that 58 percent of respondents who say yes that there is a benefit of having a no take area nearby.

Attitude Community residents of three barangays have high positive attitude on the size of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary (LMPS). Based on the KAP survey 84% of respondents who says that the LMPS is just the right size.

PracticeCommunity residents of three barangays are unreceptive. They don’t practice talking to anyone on the consequences of breaking the rules. KAP results shows that only 34% who says that they did not talked to anyone. What about reporting?

Trusted sources The 52% community residents of three barangays said that they trust more on friends, relatives & person on radio as source of information and the religious leaders (50%)

Media sources 57 % of respondents likes a lot the National news as their source of information and 56% likes a lot also the local news.

Any other relevant information

17% of community respondents say that they have considered taking part in reporting illegal activities to the MPA ManagersPlease add in this section info on flagship sp, climate change questions and stage of behavior

Comments

TA3 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE Is this primary (meaning you will develop campaign materials and messages for them) or more likely your BR group?– BDC (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4

What do we know about this group?

BDC members of three barangays will lead in the governance & enforcement of the MPA. Based on the result of the MPA effectiveness rating, there is no management body formed yet and not functional. They are lack of capacity building in terms of organizational management, planning, implementing and monitoring. This resulted to lack of confidence. Besides, some of them are lack understanding how important the MPA in their lives especially to the whole community. Target Audience are in Pre-contemplation stage.

KnowledgeThere are members of BDC that don’t understand the purpose and rules of the MPA. Shown in the result of the KAP survey, 65% of BDC members say it’s true that no one can fish & collect shell inside the Lanuza Maine Park & Sanctuary.

AttitudeIn term of attitude of 51% BDC members agreed that few people are involved in the governance of MPA. Almost half of the members are negative thinker in terms of governing MPA.

41

PracticeBDC Members of three barangays, few are attending management committee meeting. 29% of BDC members says that it is easy to attend the meeting but don’t want to do it.

Trusted sources 21% of BDC members trust the NGO as source of information.

Media sources60% of BDC Members like a lot the local news as sources of media information and the national news follow by 53%

Any other relevant information

63% of BDC disagree to statement that limiting involvement in management of the no-take area to fishers only Please add in this section info on flagship sp, climate change questions and stage of behavior

Comments

TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – LGU (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4

What do we know about this group?

Most Local Government Officials & Employees have high level of awareness that this program is one of the flagship long before the establishment of LMPS. Most of them think that only the communities are the one who will be part of it. No sense of ownership of the program. They don’t even think that they are also affected if scarcity of marine resources will occur. Also, they don’t involve themselves even in the promotion of MPA related activities. Pre contemplation stage of behavior

KnowledgeLocal Government Officials & Employees have better understanding on the purpose of having MPA. It shows in the KAP survey result that 67% of respondent who says more fish/habitat/fertility (more fish, fertile fish, bigger fish, area to reproduce) benefited by having NTZ.

AttitudeThe Local Government Officials & Employees have positive attitude in terms of having LMPS. KAP survey shows that 39 percent of respondents who says that increasing the enforcement of LMPS will gain more benefits.

PracticeSome Local Government Officials & Employees used to promote MPA related activities to friends and family members some are not. It shows in the KAP survey results that only 58 percent of respondents who says that they have promoted MPA related activities to friends and family members.

Trusted sourcesLocal Government Officials & Employees (48%) trusted most to religious leaders to talk about environmental program. KAP survey shows it. Then another is friends and family is next trusted people to talk about the environment.

Media sourcesLocal Government Officials & Employees like most on national news as media source. Its shows in the KAP survey results that 39% of respondents who says they like most national news as media source of information.

Any other relevant information

LGU Employees & Officials have less participation In the MPA according to KAP Survey. Only 31.2% talked to anyone in the LGU or community they belong regarding the MPA establishment & management 12.4% joins the coastal clean-up.

Comments Any other comments by others about this TA

42

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP) 1. Abstract

Insert 2 paragraphs summarizing what the plan entails. This is best written on completion of the BROP and should cover (why, what who, when, how) at a high summary level.The degradation of the coastal resources within Lanuza Bay rings the marginal fisherfolks in great peril. This reality will hinder the

upliftment of the economic status and to live a well-balanced ecosystem of all Lanuzanhon’s.Marine Protected Area (MPA) is one of the effective tool in fisheries management that introduce in the whole world. It serve as breeding

area for invertebrates, fishes and corals to increase abundance, biomass, diversity and improved habitat. Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary (LMPS) was established in 1998 because of declining fish catch and to resolve the malpractices and exploitation against our coastal and marine resources. Then it was legalized in 2002 through ordinance No. 9. The ordinance describes the regulations, violation penalties, boundaries and management body to perform day to day operation of the MPA especially the Core Zone now called “No Take Zone”. Years of implementation there is still need to improve the management since the LMPS still in level 1 of MPA Rating. The oversight Committee, Management Committee acknowledged the rating during organizational workshop. This result recognized by unsupportive fisherfolks(34.7%) based on the KAP survey result. Based on the biophysical status, LMPS is declining in terms of live corals (40.32%) and increased dead coral (32.77%) as well as algae (18.22) indicative of poor management and enforcement because of the decrease of the reefs recovery compared to previous years.(HARIBON Assessment). Fish Abundance dominated by Family promancitridae or the damselfishes/palata has the highest abundance with 175 ind/500m2, and followed by Family Caesionidae(sulid). This can be described by the intrusion of compressor and spear fishing. Poor governance and enforcement demands to find strategies that community within the coastal area should participate in the management of the MPA. The diagnostic process (PCRA, MPA rating) had been instrumental in identifying the issues and used as basis in developing this MPA Governance and Management Plan (MPA-GMP) to improve governance, enforcement and community buy-in. This MPA-GMP will be carried out by the Management Body from June 2011-June 2012 and will be assessd during meetings.

This MPA-GMP will be supported by funding opportunities from various sources such as the municipal CRM budget, NGAs, NGOs and small grants from local organizations.

2. Introduction

43

This section should focus on why the plan focuses on governance and enforcement and how it fits into the overall campaign strategy

The Philippines ranked first with the most number of MPAs in the world. About 25% of the world’s MPAs are found in the Philippines. However, 15% of these MPAs are doomed to fail in annual basis due to poor governance and weak enforcement (Aliṅo 1998)

Governance refer to the clarity of processes in selecting leaders to manage the MPA and enforcement (a subset of governance) refer to the capacity and availability of funds to perform such roles that involves the entire process such as deterrence, apprehension, case filing and decision. The poor selection in the management body will result to lack of community buy-in to support the MPA project, unregulated superfluous exploitation by unscrupulous people inside the MPAs.

Rare Pride Campaign is geared to change the behavior of the fishers and communities along coastal in order to stop intrusions into the MPA to gain community buy-in and improved MPA Governance & enforcement. The plans pursue to strengthen MPA Management so that behavior changes will see the benefits of the MPA in sustaining the resources within the area.

3. Objectives and scope

1. To improve MPA enforcement processes by November 2011 [i.e. upgraded guardhouse, enforcement, protocols/plans, intelligence network and communication, logbook system]

2. To improve MPA governance system by November 2011 [i.e. regular meeting, increase membership, documentation, management planning, evaluation, monitoring team]

3. Improve MPA effectiveness rating to level 3 [enforced] by June 2012

4. Tools of processes

Three participatory assessment methods were used to assess current status of fisheries, management performance and community knowledge and practices namely Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA), TWG and ManCom OD and planning workshops and KAP survey.

1. PCRA is a critical assessment tool that takes into account the community as the main source of information and data gatherers. It has been widely used in the Philippines since the birth of community-based resource management projects in over 3 decades now. This tool generated a

44

whole suite of focused group discussions [FGDs] not limited to fishery enforcement, resource map, MPA history and etc. The objective of which is to improve community buy-in right at start of project and understand the fishery status in the locality.

2. MPA effectiveness rating system is a self-assessment tool initiated by CCEF and modified by EcoGov to determine management performance of MPA. It is a system that came about to address the need to improve the overall quality of management-since most MPA face difficulty in enforcement due to poverty and general lack of awareness about the coastal environment. This rating was administered on May 10,2011 with the newly reconstituted MPA management body [TWG and ManCom]. This tool generated conclusions on management status and management focus, collated documents supporting rating, and basis for planning.

3. Organizational development is a conceptual, organization-wide effort to increase an organizations effectiveness and viability through an external facilitator. In our case, we employed OD to assess the local organizations i.e. the TWG and ManCom vis a vis MPA management on separate dates. This workshops generated action plan focusing on improving organizational performance and strengthening for improve MPA governance and enforcement.

5. MPA profile

MPA history, resource use and enforcement

1. PCRA

Since the LMPS establishment in 1998, lot of apprehension made by the MPA managers and Municipal Enforcement Team. Accounted fisher from within the municipality and nearby municipalities intrude the MPA and municipal waters. The apprehended fishers pleaded guilty during court hearing and paid the penalties but some violators was not captured because they are armed and fled immediately when they heard the boat of the apprehending officers especially night time. Some violations include intrusion to NTZ using compressor fishing, spear fishing using modified flashlight during night time and Gillnets. Also, the commercial fishing (Danish siene) intrudes the municipal water since the establishment of MPA and cases were filed in court. Presently, one case still in court of appeal, other still in trial courts. Not all intruders are accounted for since MPA

45

Bantay Dagat has no logbook and system to do it. Only Cases filed in court be accounted for. Also, lack of enforcement logistics, community support and intelligence and the capacity to practice the whole enforcement continuum aggravates the recording system. The number of infringement since 2002 up to 2010 accounted to 8 persons from within the municipality and 71 from other municipalities.

a. FGD ON ENFORCEMENT:

YEAR No. of Infringement Types/forms of infringement gears

used

Intruders from where,who age

group

Course of action taken apprehension affidavit writing ,litigation

imprisonment.2002 1 Spear fishing Cagmino Amicable

2004 2

3

Gill net fishing

Spear fishing

Cagmino

Balibadon

Imprisonment of 2 weeks but availed the probation

MPA Managers unable to apprehend the violator because they are armed

2005 4

2

7 (1 boat)

Spear fishing with flashlightSpear fishing with flashlight

Danish Siene

Balibadon

Balibadon

Cantilan

Amicable

Unable to apprehend because they are armed

Apprehended Case filed in court

2006 4 Spear fishing Carrascal Unable to apprehend because they ran away

2007 27(4 boats)

6

Danish Siene

Compressor fishing

Cantilan

Socorro

Apprehended Case filed in court Pleaded guilty during court

litigation2008 5 (1 boat) Danish Siene Cantilan Pleaded guilty during court

litigation

46

2009 8 (2 boats) Danish Siene Cantilan / Carrascal

Pleaded guilty during court litigation

2010 4

6

Spear fishing

Danish Siene Carrascal

Unable to apprehend because no patrol boat available

Case filed in court

b. FGD ON MPA History:

The degradation of the coastal resources within Lanuza Bay rings the marginal fisherfolks in great peril. This reality will hinder the upliftment of the economic status and to live a well-balanced ecosystem of all Lanuzanhon’s. Therefore, Local Government Unit of Lanuza (LGU) spearheads the Lanuza Sagip Karagatan Program (LSKP) in 1995. Management interventions were introduced to resolve the malpractices and exploitation against our coastal and marine resources and aiming in rectifying the malpractices and abuses done against our coastal resources. It envisioned a well-managed resource for sustainable development of the locality. Thus, MPA establishment is one of the interventions to address issues on declining of fish catch, using active gears in getting the resources and intrusion of commercial fishers.

YEAR PROJECT OR EVENT GOALS REPONSIBLE IMPLEMENTING

PARTY

OUTCOME

1995 - 2000 Lanuza Sagip Karagatan Program

To help fisherfolks increase their catch

MLGU/MAO Successful fisheries management

1998 MPA establishment To have a breeding ground of fishing

To preserve reef habitat

MLGU/MAO/BFARMC/MFARMC

More fish in the Core Zone/ NTZ that entice illegal fishers to intrude

2000-2007 PO managed the MPA To emppower community based

Kapunungan ng Lanuzanhon’g

First 2 years the mgt, runs good but in the later part, managers are the one

47

organization manage Mananagat (KALMA) - Cagmino

intruding the NTZ

2008-2011 LGU managed the MPA

To continue with the program /project

MLGU/MAO Poor Enforcement, Management and no community buy-in

c. Threats and Management Challenges of the MPA

HARD ENFORCEMENT SOFT ENFORCEMENT MANGEMENT BODY1. Commercial fishing (Danish Siene) inside

Municipal Water2. Use of Modified flashlight in spear fishing3. Compressor fishing

1. Lack maintenance plan for marker buoys2. Absence of bulletin board in the

guardhouse3. Lack of telescope, cellphone, gps

1. Lack of management body

2. MPA Effectiveness Rating

The MPA Rating of LMPS was level 1 though it exist a decade ago. This rating is better understood in the organizational development principles which include the management focus such as the absence of management body, management plan, poor community participation, IEC, lack of financial support, M & E and maintenance of Infrastructure and site development.

Management Focus Relevant indicatorsTotal Available points

Actual Score per Management Focus

Actual Score divided by Total Available Points

Management Plan 4, [10], 27, 38, [39] 9 0 0.0%Management Body 5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40 10 1 10.0%Legal Instrument and support 6, [9], 37, 41 6 5 83.3%Community Participation [1], [3], 8 7 6 85.7%Financing [12], 19, 28, 35, 49 7 6 85.7%IEC 7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46] 12 2 16.7%

Enforcement[13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36] 19 7 36.8%

Monitoring and evaluation 2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43] 9 2 22.2%

48

Maintenance of infrastructure and site development

16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48 6 5 83.3%

85

3. OC and ManCom VM and composition, EO reference

49

TWG - OC Lanuza MPS Oversight Committee (OC) was organized in December 15, 2010. Then it was TWG and it just an orientation of the RARE

Conservation and the tool they are using to change the behavior of stakeholders in buying in the MPA establishment. Then on March 7, 2011, the second meeting presented the executive number 003 to serve as the policy making unit of the MPA management body for consultation before the Municipal Mayor sign the EO and the body change TWG into OC. The OC compose of the different offices in the LGU and other sectors in society that is connected in the implementation of managing the marine resources. It was this year with the help of RARE that reviewing their functions in helping the RARE Pride Campaign. Since then, they are showing support through attendance of meetings, providing technical assistance in a series of activities that being conducted. An executive order supporting the OC is attached to appendix H2.

TWG will craft policies, rules and regulation based on the recommendation of the ManCom in the implementation of Barrier Removal Activities and management of the MPA. They will help the ManCom in all the activities in the management plan of the MPA.

VISION:“Lanuza, a healthy& sustainably managed environment that promotes eco-tourism and enhances agri-fishery productivity that makes a

self-sufficient, God Fearing and Peaceful Community in CARAGA Region, wherein people have equitable access to the basic services, enjoying a better quality of life through a transparent administration of the Local economy that is propelled by upright and committed leaders with the active participation of the empowered citizenry”

MISSION:“The Municipality of Lanuza aims to uplift the quality of life by providing the basic services in a peaceful environment, protect its

resources, promote a vibrant economy through a partnership between the government and the private sector”

Name Office and Position Contact Responsibilities

50

1. Boromeo C. Micabalo Municipal Agriculture Office / Municipal Agriculturist or his representative

09108224640 Formulate, develop plans and Implements programs and projects on MPA

2. Rolito Antonio F. Trinidad Municipal Planning and Development Office/ Municipal Planning and Development Officer or representative

09384091968 Provide technical assistance on planning and budgeting

3. Ranulfo M. Arreza Municipal Environment & Natural Resources Office/Municipal Environment & Nat. Resources Officer or his representative

09182976870 Provide & help formulate plans for MPA project

4. Renars P. Salubre Philippine National Police or his representative 09194744384 Lead on enforcing MPA ordinance 5. Algerico H. Irizari, M.D. Municipal Vice Mayor or his alternative

representative09202951935 Provide policy support to MPA and allocate

funds 6. Richard F. Arreza Sangguniang Bayan, Committee Chair on

Environment his alternative representative Provide policy support to MPA and allocate funds

7. Sofronia J. Calmares Sangguniang Bayan, Committee Chair on Agriculture her alternative Rep.

Provide policy support to MPA and allocate funds

8. Ian Lemuel B. Felix, CE Municipal Engineering Office (MEO) Prepares program of work and detailed engineering designs related to MPA

11. Roberto Aguhob Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council(MFARMC)

Recommend policy to management body and SB

12. Rogelio U. Sering Municipal Community Affairs Officer (MCAO) Provide support in social marketing approach

13. Johans Willianm I. Arreza Environment Specialist Officer (ES) 09261127203 Provide & help formulate plans for MPA project

14. Gerardo Maglinte Lanuza Bay Development Alliance (LBDA) 09285040633 Provide technical and legal assistance to the management body

15. Teresita F. Fuerte One representatives from Dep-Ed (Elementary Level) Assist during the campaign16. Flordeliz C. Urquiza One representatives from Dep-Ed (High School Level) Assist during the campaign17. One representative from the business sector

(tourism / diving related) Assist in eco-tourism plan on MPA

18. Godofredo G. Urbiztondo One representative from the SIFA Organization Provide assistance to the management body in the enforcement

19. Leony P. Lipao Barangay Captain of Habag Provide policy support to MPA and allocate funds

51

20. Ramer P. Silvano Barangay Captain of Sibahay 09086528550 Provide policy support to MPA and allocate funds

21. Edmond R. Jumalon Barangay Captain of Nurcia Provide policy support to MPA and allocate funds

22. Edgar Fallado Bantay Dagat enforcers representative 09306383577 Provide information on the enforcement in making policy

23. Dante A. Limpot One Representative of Lanuza Divers 09182812150 Provide information on the status of habitat in making policy

ManCom

The Management Committee of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary is composed of Barangay Development Council of three Barangays namely: Habag, Sibahay and Nurcia. The selection of this was conceptualized during the stakeholders meeting that every barangay said that a certain people own the MPA and finger point to a certain group. Some of the members of ManCom members have the eagerness to manage govern the MPA and enforce the law. They attended lectures on fisheries status, social marketing as tool to enhance the governance of MPA and owning it as they gain more benefits. They also join in the PCRA process to see real status of the MPA there going to manage. An executive order supporting the ManCom is attached to appendix H2.

ManCom has different task to do according to the sector they belong such as Education, Enforcement, Logistics, Documentations, Reef Assessment, monitoring and conduct regular meeting. Also, they are tasked to implement activities in the MPA Barrier Removal Operational Plan.

Municipal Level

Name Office and Position Contact Responsibilities1. Boromeo C. Micabalo Municipal Agriculture Office / Municipal

Agriculturist or hisrepresentative09108224640 Form regular ulate, develop plans and

Implements programs and projects on MPA

2. Rolito Antonio F. Trinidad Municipal Planning and Development Office/ Municipal Planning and Development Officer or representative

09384091968 Provide technical assistance on planning and budgeting

3. Ranulfo M. Arreza Municipal Environment & Natural Resources Office/Municipal Environment & Nat. Resources Officer or his representative

09182976870 Provide & help formulate plans for MPA project

4. Renars P. Salubre Philippine National Police or his representative 09194744384 Lead on enforcing MPA ordinance

52

5. Edmond R. Jumalon Barangay Captain or his representative – Nurcia Lead in the implementation of policies of the MPA

6. Ramer P. Silvano Barangay Captain or his representative – Sibahay 09086528550 Lead in the implementation of policies of the MPA

7. Leony P. Lipao Barangay Captain or his representative – Habag Lead in the implementation of policies of the MPA

Barangay Level

Name Office and Position Contact Responsibilities1. Leony P.Lipao

Ramer P. SilvanoEdmond R. Jumalon

Barangay CaptainLead in the sourcing of funds and enactment of policies for improvement of the MPA

2. Eleazar B. OrtuyoDonatila BactolJeffrey R. Orillaneda

Barangay Kagawad Oversee the operation of the MPA in the barangay level

3. Patricio TanasasRicardo MirabelVicente Mahinay

POs Representative Lead in the conduct on bio-physical monitoring

4. Roberto AguhobMaria JovitaCerilo A. Astronomo

Chairman and representative of the BFARMC Lead in the policy making

5. Edgar FalladoMoises OhaoAlberto Balili

Representative of the Bantay dagats in the area

Lead in the surveillance and patrolling of the MPA

6. Nellie DoloriconMaria PlazaFloricito Silvoza

School teachers Lead in the conduct of IEC

7. Purok leaders Purok leaders Lead in the socio-eco monitoring8. Representative from a women’s

organization in the areaRepresentative from a women’s organization in the area Lead in the socio-eco monitoring

53

9. Representative of the Youth organization in the area

Representative of the Youth organization in the area Lead in the education of the youth

10.Crisanto PiocFlorante BaculioJose Malikse

Representative of the religious group in the area

Lead in the implementation of all livelihood programs related to MPA

11.Alberto BaliliMaria Jovita Senior citizen Counselor of the ManCom

12.Business organization Business organization13.NGOs operating in the area NGOs operating in the area Assist the ManCom in governance14.Any other group that is

interested Any other group that is interested

6. Action Plan [This are the activities that resulted out of your MPA effectiveness rating action planning workshop and TWG and ManCom planning workshops. Timeline should follow the campaign life. You may include other strategies and activities from existing MPA plans and other meetings relevant to governance and enforcement.

Critical Areas Relevant indicators

Smart objectives

Specific activity

Person responsible

Timeframe Budget Source of Budget

Support Needed

Remarks

Management Plan (0%)

(L2-10)Management plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB [Ang Management plan gisagop ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod sa LGU]

By the end of June 2012 Management Plan of Lanuza MPA will be adopted by the SB

Draft Management Plan

Beth/TWG Sept.- Nov. 2011

15,000.00 LGU LBDA/APREDEC

Discuss with the TWG the management plan

Anul/Mayor Jan. 2012 2,000.00 LGU

Present to the SB

C/o TWG Jan. 2012 MFARMC

54

Wait for the approval

SB April 2012

Management Body (0%)

Management body formed and functional [Ang Management body naumol na ug naglihok]

By 2012, broaden composition of Management body to include other sectors in the brgy level

Organize the Management body at the barangay level

CF/ ACF July 25-27, 2011

TWG

Management body active and supported by legal instrument [Ang Management body actibo na ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod-legal nga documento]

By 2012 Management body actively participated in the governance & enforcement of MPA

Draft Executive Order

C/o this workshop 13-May-11 Done

Monthly meeting

CF/ ACF/TWG August 2011 200.00/meeting LGU

Facilitate Operational Planning at the brgy level

CF/ ACF August 2011 6,000.00 RARE/BR Funds

55

Organize the ExeCom for the ManCom

CF/ACF/TWG August 2011 200.00 LGU

(Performance monitoring program in place and conducted regularly for 2 consecutive years or more; reporting system for ordinary citizens to complain w/o fear of consequences available and widely known) [Natukod na ang programa sa pag monitor ug gibuhat kada duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; adunay

To initiate the practice of performance monitoring as a regular practice of the MPA management body by 2012

Conduct performance assessment

MANCOM C/o Beth

July 2012 10,000.00 RARE/BR Funds

LBDA/APREDEC

56

reporting system sa mga mulo sa katawhan ]

Legal Instrument and support (83.3%)

Community Participation (85.7%)

Community acceptance gained and documented [Ang pag-dawat sa katilingban naangkon ug nakasulat]

To gained acceptance from the community thru brgy resolutions and barangay assemblies

Draft pro forma resolution and minutes, attendance of assemblies

Hon. Jeffrey orillaneda

August 2011

Discuss in the barangay

Barangay Council August 2011

Financing (85.7%) Revenues from enterprise and/or fees sustained and accounted for (Existing sustainable financing mechanisms are well-managed and well-documented; financial reports easily accessible)

To define the role of the barangay level groups in the collection & management of the MPA user fees

Discussion with Sub-sectors of 3 Barangays

Sectoral Representative of ManCom in each Barangay

1st week - Sept 2011

300.00 LGU

Discussion with ManCom

3rd week - Sept 2011

300.00 LGU

IEC (16.7%) Education program

C/o Social Marketing

Launching of Pride

TWG/ManCom/CF/ACF

Oct’11-July 2012

5,000.00 305,000.00

LGURARE

57

sustained public awareness and compliance

Campaign

Enforcement (36.8) Collaborative patrolling and surveillance conducted by mandated enforcement group and local community volunteers, records maintained and open to everyone [Hiniusang pagbantay ug pagmatngon gipahigayon na inubanan sa enforcement group (PNP) ug local nga voluntaryo; mga record padayon gibuhat ug abre alang sa tanan]

1. By Nov. 2011, re-activation & mobilization of DFWs by barangay2. To establish enforcement system by November 2011

1. Conduct Refresher Course and Issue ID, Uniform

Beth November 2011

2. Install logbook in the guardhouse

CF/ManCom August 2011

3. Establish ManCom/CF/ August

58

surveillance system

Bantay Dagat 2011

4. Ensure 24/7 guarding & patrolling

ManCom/Bantay Dagat

100,000.00 LGU

Fishing effectively stopped inside the sanctuary zone [Ang panagat sulod sa MPA nahunong na]

Expand patrolling responsibilities into 3 brgys. Thru volunteering

Explore options providing insurance by incorporating in the AIP and benefits and recognition

Beth & MANCOM Oct-11 10,000.00 LGU/Brgy

Monitoring and evaluation

Regular participatory biophysical monitoring being conducted [Kanunay nga pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat]

Improve local capacity for biophysical resource monitoring

Conduct PMSM

Dante Limpot/ Beth/ManCom

RARE

Preliminary management plan drafted (4)

Conduct PCRA ManCom/CF May 19-20, 2011

18,200.00 RARE Done

Conduct Community Reef

Dante May 19-20, 2011

Rare

59

Monitoring

Analysis of data and community consultation to formulate management plan

Beth/TWG 23-May-11 16,000.00 RARE

Performance M&E linked to an incentive system regularly conducted

To initiate the practice of performance monitoring in the MPA management body

Conduct MPA Effectiveness Assessment Rating

Beth TWG July 2012

Maintenance of infrastructure and site development (83.3%)

Expansion strategies or enhancement programs initiated (MPA coverage is expanded, e.g. from a sanctuary to a park; or scope of conservation activities is heightened, e.g. coral reef restoration, culturing of clams, etc)

To explore options for stronger boundary markers especialyy for the windy months of Nov-march by 2012

Discuss with TWG and ManCom,

Beth April 2012 50,000.00 External

60

Monitoring

Progress of the BR implementation strategy will be measured against the specific SMART objectives outlined in the action table above.

The overall success of the Governance and Management Plan will be measured through the EcoGov/CCEF MPA effectiveness rating tool.The goal of the Plan, in combination with the Rare pride campaign is to up 1 level higher from present or achieve level 3 “Enforced” by June 2012The monitoring plan of the Pride campaign foresees the monitoring of a number of additional metrics to assess the progress on barrier removal, behavior change and threat reduction:

% of members of Mgt Committee belonging to listed categories (local village leaders, influential family members, local women’s associations, private sector representatives, local religious groups, civil service and the youth sector)

% of days per month that there is a record of 24/7 guarding coverage in log book Increase in arrest for year 1 Number of attendees of Barangay Assemblies Monthly activities conducted by enforcement team (outreach, market denial, foot patrols, meetings with community intelligence

partners, etc.) average n of reports of intrusions received per month by the enforcement team N of intrusions from local versus outside fishers Decrease in intrusions from community and adjacent village Decrease in illegal and destructive fishing

For more details on the frequency and methods for data collection please refer to the campaign monitoring plan.

Feasibility and Impact

This action plan underwent expert validation and approval process. The planning workshop was facilitated by an external auditor, Rodolfo Santos, PhD. He has a long history of organizational development facilitation in organizations of various level and scale in the Philippines following a diverse business model. The tool used in planning i.e. MPA Effectiveness Rating is a standard tool in the Philippines to assess management performance of MPAs which has been published by White et al. 2001 and was further enhance by EcoGov Philippine and UP-MSI [MEAT]. The action plans was an output of the 2 day workshop participated by the TWG, ManCom local fishers, enforcers, LGU department heads who are considered experts in their localities thereby producing a ground truth strategies. Since this will be integrated in the Project Plan where LAP/LCE endorsement is affixed, the same signature will suffice for approval. This action plan will be validated back to the community after a series of iterations during module 3 to serve as the road map to achieve Level 3 status by June 2012.

61

62

D. Monitoring PlanTarget Audience Results chain Survey

question Baseline target Desired pp

change (specify if increase or decrease)

SMART GoalsExample: The % of respondents who say... will increase/decrease from XX% measured in March 2010 to YY% measured in August 2012 (an increase/decrease of YY-XXpp, Qx in KAP survey)

TA1 - Local Fishers

K-Knowledge Fisherfolks know the benefits from having the no-take fishing area and the rules and regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

(Q 24B)(Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know.

86% 95% 9pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of fishers from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that can name more fsih/habitat/fertility (more fish, fertile fish,bigger fish,area to reproduce ) from 86% in April 2011 to 95% (in increase of 9pp)

(Q 24A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question) COHORT QUESTION)

71% 90% 19pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that answer "yes" that there is a benefit of having a no take area will increase from 71% (April 2011) to 90% (in increase of 19pp)

A-Attitude Fisherfolks believed on the importance of the MPA for sustainable fishing that is why they should not

(Q 27A) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local

44% 70% 26pp decrease 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that answer "disagree" that fish species will continue to decline in number or disapper if the

63

intrude in Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

community if the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers:

Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers will decrease from 44% (April 2011) to 18% (in decrease of 26pp)

IC-Interpersonal Communication

Fisherfolks discuss with one another about the consequences of not intruding the MPA for the sustainable fishing and increase income

(Q 40)In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

55% 70% 15pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that talking to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations will increase from 55% (April 2011) to 70% (in increase of 15pp)

BR-Barrier removal Fisherfolks will help in the enforcement and participate management meetings

(Q37)I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (B) Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions of the no-take area

81% 90% 9%pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers agreed that Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions of the no-take area will increase from 81% (April 2011) to 90% (in increase of 9pp)

(Q37)I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you

69% 80% 11%pp increase

1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers agreed that There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no-take area will increase

64

to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (L)There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no-take area

from 69% (April 2011) to 80% (in increase of 11pp)

(Q37)I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (N) There are no current problems with the no-take area management

54% 75% 21%pp decrease

1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers agreed that There are no current problems with the no-take area management will increase from 54% (April 2011) to 75% (in decrease of 21pp)

BC- Behavior change Fisherfolks stop intruding the no take zone (Core Zone) of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary and reporting cases of intrusions to the MPA

(Q42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not) (A) Subsistence fishers from your village

69% 80% 21%pp increase

1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that seen subsistence fishers from the barangay will decrease from 31% (April 2011) to 20% (in decrease of 11pp)

TR-Threat reduction Reduced intrusion to the no take zone of

(Q43) I am going to read you a list of different types

60% 80% 20pp decrease 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that seen

65

LMPS through blotter reports and logbooks of the enforcement team

of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not) (A) Subsistence fishers from your village

subsistence fishers from the barangay will decrease from 40% (April 2011) to 20% (in decrease of 20pp)

CR-Conservation Result Increase biodiversity and coral reef ecosystem

(Q35) Have you notice any changes in the fish catch as a result of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as N/A)

18% 40% 22pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of fishers that there is an increase of fish catch from 18% (April 2011) to 40% (in increase of 22pp)

TA3-Community ResidentsK-Knowledge Coastal Communities

know the benefits from having the no-take fishing area and the rules and regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

(Q 24B)(Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but t

67% 80% 13pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of Community Residents from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that there is a benefits from having NTZ nearby no more destructive fishing in the area from 67% in April 2011 to 80% (in increase of 13pp)

(Q 24A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES

54% 75% 21pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012there is statistically significant the % of Community Resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that

66

then please also ask next question) COHORT QUESTION)

answer "yes" that there is a benefit of having a no take area will increase from 54% (April 2011) to 75% (in increase of 21pp)

A-Attitude Coastal communities believed that reporting any activities to MPA managers and observing MPA rules and regulations will have a positive impact on the local community

(Q32) What do you think of the size of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, now that they are being reduce?

50% 70% 20pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase the % of community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag says that its just the right size of MPA will increase from 50% (April 2011) to 70% (in increase of 20pp)

IC-Interpersonal Communication

Community residents talk to one another about the consequence in breaking the rules and regulations of Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary and their role to report on any activities in the MPA to the MPA managers.

(Q38)In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in ensuring the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary are well-managed in order to benefit the community? If you have, with whome you have talked to about this.

64% 80% 16pp decrease 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant decrease the % of community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag talked to anyone from 36% (April 2011) to52% (in decrease of 20pp)

BR-Barrier Removal Reporting system in place for community residents to report to MPA enforcers

(Q37) I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (F)

69% 90% 21pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase the % of community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag agree that the rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished from 69% (April

67

The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished(COHORT QUESTION)

2011) to 90% (in increase of 21pp)

BC - Behavior change Involvement in the reporting to MPA managers and surveillance of intrusion in the NTZ

(Q46) ) In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations to the enforcement team? [ ] Yes [ ] No ()not sure ()NA

66% 85% 19pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase the % of community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag said yes that they heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations to the enforcement team from 66% (April 2011) to 85% (in increase of 19pp)

TR-Threat reduction Reduce the number of illegal fishers encroaching the MPA through reporting of community residents

(Q42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP) (A) Subsistence fishers from your village

47% 65% 18pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of community resident not seen subsistence fishers from your village fishing in the NTZ will increase from 47% (April 2011) to 65% (in increase of 18pp)

68

(Q42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP) (B)Subsistence fishers from nearby villages

42% 60% 18pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag not seen subsistence fishers from nearby village fishing in the NTZ will increase from 42% (April 2011) to 60% (in increase of 18pp)

(Q42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP) (C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas

44% 60% 16pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of Community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag have not seen subsistence fishers from outside areas will increase from 44% (April 2011) to 60% (in increase of 16pp)

69

CR-Conservation result TA2-BDCK-Knowledge BDC will know the

establishing an MPA for the benefits of fisherfolks and their role in managing the MPA

(Q 49) What benefits might there be in establishing a Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Committee ? (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know)

63% 85% 22pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that there is a benefits from having NTZ nearby and can name more fsih/habitat/fertility (more fish, fertile fish,bigger fish,area to reproduce ) from 63% in April 2011 to 85% (in increase of 22pp)

A-Attitude BDC believed that the MPA should be established with policy, rules, regulation to discourage intrusions and that they need to manage or govern it

(Q28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary: (A) Only a few people are involved with the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary management

51% 70% 19pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag not agreed with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary: that Only few people are involved with the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary management from 51% in April 2011 to 70% (in increase of 19pp)

(Q28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary: (B) No-one knows who is managing the

50% 70% 20pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag disagreed with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary No-one knows who is managing it

70

Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

from 50% in April 2011 to 70% (in increase of 20pp)

(Q28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary: (F)Only men are involved in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, so the interests and concerns of women or youth are be ignored

58% 80% 22pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant decrease in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag disagree that Only men are involved in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, so the interests and concerns of women or youth are be ignored from 58% in April 2011 to 80% (in increase of 22pp)

IC- Interpersonal Communication

BDC Members discuss with each other need for improved management and governance and their role in increasing enforcement, improving guarding system and setting aside budget for managing day to day operations of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

(Q39) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in day to day operation of the MPA which include attendance in regular meetings, reef assessment and making sure financial and human resources are available of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

10% 30% 20pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag talked to spouse/partner about your role in day to day operation of the MPA which include attendance in regular meetings, reef assessment and making sure financial and human resources are available of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary from 10% in April 2011 to 30% (in increase of 20pp)

BR-Barrier Removal BDC Members will actively participate in the orientation/training on MPA management

(Q28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the

69% 85% 16pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag agreed that regulations need

71

planning, organizational development , MPA monitoring (bio-physical & soci-eco survey )

Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary: (G)The Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary regulations need to be followed by all people who go into the sanctuary.

to be followed by all people who go into the sanctuary. from 69% in April 2011 to 85% (in decrease of 16pp)

BC- Behavior change Participate in day to day operation of the MPA which include attendance in regular meetings, reef assessment and making sure financial and human resources are available

(Q44)During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area(COHORT QUESTION)

28% 50% 22pp decrease 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that they are involved in the creation of NTZ from 28% in April 2011 to 50% (in decrease of 22pp)

TR-Threat reduction Reduced intrusion to the no take zone of LMPS through effective day to day operations of LMPS

Q42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP) (C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas

44% 60% 16pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 the % of Community resident from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag have not seen subsistence fishers from outside areas will increase from 44% (April 2011) to 60% (in increase of 16pp)

Conservation Results Increase Biodiversity (Q35) Have you notice any 8% 30% 22pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012

72

and coral reef ecosystem

changes in the fish catch as a result of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as N/A)

there is statistically significant increase in the % of BDC from Nurcia, Sibahay, Habag that there is an increase of catch as result of LMPS from 8% in April 2011 to 30% (in increase of 22pp)

TA4 - LGUK-Knowledge LGU Officials are

aware of the benefits of establishing a no-take area in Lanuza

(Q 24A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question) COHORT QUESTION)

71% 90% 19pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees that answer "yes" that there is a benefit of having a no take area will increase from 71% (April 2011) to 90% (in increase of 19pp)

(Q 24B)(Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but t

67% 85% 18pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees that there is a benefits from having NTZ nearby and can name more fsih/habitat/fertility (more fish, fertile fish,bigger fish,area to reproduce ) from 67% in April 2011 to 85% (in increase of 18pp)

A-Attitude LGU Officials & Employees believed that they have a role in the promotion of MPA related activities

(Q29) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary?

39% 55% 16pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees like to support for increasing the

73

and during the pride campaign launch.

enforcement of the regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary will increase from 39% (April 2011) to 55% (in increase of 16pp)

(Q31)Which of the following statements best represents you about involvement in any activities related to Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary?

34% 55% 21pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees like to be involved in any activities related to MPA will increase from 34% (April 2011) to 55% (in increase of 21pp)

IC-Interpersonal Communication

Discuss with fellow local government officials and municipal employees regarding their role in promoting campaign activities.

(Q41) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "your own role in promoting pride campaign activities"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

5% 25% 20pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees talked to Barangay Councils about "your own role in promoting pride campaign activities will increase from 5% (April 2011) to 25% (in increase of 20pp)

BR-Barrier removal LGU will help in enhancing the MPA Governance and legislate laws that aid or improve the MPA physically & its enforcement

(Q37)I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (I) The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to

61% 80% 19pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees agreed that infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of the no-take area are adequate will increase from 61% (April 2011) to 80% (in increase of 19pp)

74

enforce the rules of the no-take area are adequate

(Q37)I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. (J) There is an adequate communications program about the no-take area

35% 50% 15pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Em[ployees agreed that adequate communications program about the no-take area will increase from 61% (April 2011) to 80% (in increase of 19pp)

BC-Behavior change Taking part in MPA and campaign related

(Q47) In the past six months, have you participated in any of the activities related to Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary?

12% 30% 18pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Em[ployees participated in the coastal clean up of the MPA activity will increase from 12% (April 2011) to 30% (in increase of 18pp)

(Q22) I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have been involved in campaign activities of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary in the past 6 months. Please tell me which one is best represents you.

2% 30% 28pp increase 1) By the end of August 2012 there is statistically significant increase in the % of LGU Officials & Employees that I have talked someone to taking part in campaign activities but not partipated yet will increase from 12% (April 2011) to 30% (in increase of 18pp)

TR-Threat reduction

75

CR-Conservation Result

E. WORK PLAN WITH BUDGETThe specific activities and budget for the campaign are outlines in a separate excel spreadsheet. Once it is complete you can insert a brief reference to it here listing some of the key activities and the total budget.

76

F.ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PLANThis plan has been shared with and endorsed by the Technical Working Committee and Management Committee of the LANUZA MARINE PARK & SANCTUARY (LMPS). It was also shared with key stakeholders of Barangays Habag, Sibahay and Nurcia as well as with those interviewed during the directed conversations. Throughout the planning process new ideas and recommendations have been incorporated and revisions made, to the extent that this plan has now been approved by all critical partners including the Municipal Mayor of Lanuza, the LAP supervisor XXX and Rare. The plan will be posted on RarePlanet, which will continue to be used for information sharing and periodic updates: www.rareplanet.org (insert link to your campaign milestones page).

This plan has been read and approved by:

BOROMEO C. MICABALOMunicipal AgriculturistLAP Supervisor

SALVACION S. AZARCONMunicipal MayorLead Agency Partner

77

G. References and AcknowledgementsReferencesInsert a list of all literature consulted & referenced in the planExample: Margoluis, R. A. & Salafsky N. (1998) Measures of Success, Island Press, Washington DC. Jenks B. (2001) An island under threat;; 96pp Searon Press

Acknowledgements

The Barrier Removal Operational Plan (BROP) of Lanuza, wishes to extend its gratitude to the Barangay Development Council of Barangay Habag, Sibahay and Nurcia (ManCom), Oversight Committee (OC) headed by our Municipal Mayor, Municipal Agriculture Office and other partners who in one way or another had contributed and extended their invaluable support to make this Plan a reality.

Likewise, sincere gratitude is hereby extended to all the concerned fisherfolks of Lanuza who continuously provide support, assistance and contributions for without them, this Plan will not be possible.

78

H. APPENDICES1. Fisheries profile

Refer to fisheries profile template for this, insert only those sections that you have done through your PCRA

TREND DIAGRAM PERCENTAGE OF CORAL COVER

Annual Catch of Fisher

79

RESOURCE MAP (Community Reef Monitoring)

80

2. Executive Order for TWG & MANCOM

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Surigao del Sur

Municipality of Lanuza

81

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 003Series of 2011

AN EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING THE LANUZA MARINE PARK & SANCTUARY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

WHEREAS, coastal and fisheries resources contribute significantly to income, employment, livelihood and nutrition to people of this municipality;

WHEREAS, coastal and fisheries resources are in crisis as evidenced by the declining fish catch, size, and species composition in the municipal waters, which call for solutions to reverse these negative trends;

WHEREAS, the 1991 Local Government Code confers responsibility to local Government units(LGUs) to develop and implement a multi-sectoral development plan, manage municipal waters and to coordinate development efforts within their territorial jurisdiction;

WHEREAS, under the 1998 Fisheries Code, the municipal governments are responsible for the management, conservation, protection and utilization of fishery resources within the municipal waters; and

WHEREAS, it is the policy of this municipality to manage the coastal and fishery resources in a manner consistent with the principles of coastal resource management; protect and manage the municipal waters and its coastal and fisheries resources for the enjoyment and benefits of the municipal fishers in perpetuity; enhance people’s participation in the management of the coastal and fishery resources of the municipality.

WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9 series 2002 declared the establishment of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary to properly protect and manage the LGU’s marine resources;

WHEREAS, the Local Government Unit of Lanuza in partnership with RARE Incorporated implements a two-year Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Pride Program;

WHEREAS, there is a need to formally organize the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Oversight Committee to ensure continuous guidance and technical assistance in terms of marine sanctuary governance for the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, SALVACION S. AZARCON, Mayor of the Municipality of Lanuza, Surigao del Sur, by virtue of powers vested in me by law, and in accordance therewith, do hereby ordain the following:

Section 1. CREATION.

There is hereby created a Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Technical Working Group to be composed of the following:

82

1. Municipal Mayor or her alternative representative

2. Municipal Vice Mayor or his alternative representative

3. Sangguniang Bayan, Committee Chair on Environment his alternative representative

4. Sangguniang Bayan, Committee Chair on Agriculture her alternative representative

5. Municipal Planning and Development Office (MPDO)

6. Municipal Agriculture Office (MAO)

7. Municipal Engineering Office (MEO)

8. Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council(MFARMC)

9. Municipal Community Affairs Officer (MCAO)

10. Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Officer (MENRO)

11. Environment Specialist Officer (ES)

12. Lanuza Bay Development Alliance (LBDA)

13. One representatives from Dep-Ed (Elementary Level)

14. One representatives from Dep-Ed (High School Level)

15. One representative from the business sector (tourism / diving related)

16. One representative from the SIFA Organization

17. One representatives from Lanuza PNP

18. Barangay Captain of Habag

19. Barangay Captain of Sibahay

20. Barangay Captain of Nurcia

83

21. Bantay Dagat enforcers representative

22. One Representative of Lanuza Divers

Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

The Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Oversight Committee shall have the following functions and responsibilities:

a. Spearhead the planning, capacity and governance needs of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

b. Coordinate with national government agencies, other municipal government offices, non-government organizations, peoples’ organizations and other assisting organizations that seek to promote sustainable management of Coastal and fisheries resources;

c. Be in the frontline of the delivery of basic services, particularly those needed for the survival of the inhabitant during and in the aftermath of man-made and natural disasters and calamities in the coastal areas;

d. Recommend on all other matters related to coastal and fisheries resources to ensure improvement of livelihood and living condition of the coastal populace;

e. Assist to establish the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee;

f. Assist in the planning, implementation and evaluation of the Pride Program for the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary;

g. Perform such other functions deemed necessary for the development of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

Section 3. OFFICERS AND TENURE.

During such organizational meeting, the members shall elect from among themselves the Vice chairperson and the secretary and shall serve such terms of office as they may thereafter agree. The members of the Oversight Committee shall hold an organizational meeting upon proper notice from the chairperson duly noted by the undersigned.

Section 4. ROLES OF THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON

a. Presides all meetings agreed upon by the committee

b. Oversees the entire implementation of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Pride Program

c. Provide venues for consensus building among members of the committee.

d. Perform such other functions deemed necessary for the development of Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

84

Section 5: Reporting, Planning, and Monitoring. The Municipal CFRM-OVERSITE COMMITTEE shall meet at least once a QUARTER, or as the need arises, and shall prepare and submit quarterly reports and works plans to the Office of the Mayor.

Section 6: Effectivity. This executive Order shall take effect immediately.

Done this 9th of March 2011 in Lanuza, Surigao del Sur.

SALVACION S. AZARCONMunicipal Mayor

]

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Surigao del Sur

Municipality of Lanuza

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 005Series of 2011

85

AN EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING THE LANUZA MPA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution provides that the State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accordance with the rhythm and harmony of nature;

WHEREAS, the Local Government Code of 1991 or Republic Act No. 7160, devolves the management of the municipal waters and its fisheries and aquatic resources to the municipal government;

WHEREAS, the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 otherwise known as Republic Act 8550, mandates that the municipal government may enact appropriate ordinances which shall ensure the sustainable development, management and conservation of its territorial waters including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, the municipality of Lanuza enacted Municipal Ordinance (MO) No. 09-2002 establishing the Lanuza Marine Park and adopting community-based resource management as an approach to its participatory management;

WHEREAS, the Lanuza LGU in partnership with the Barangay Local Governments of Habag, Sibahay and Nurcia and RARE Incorporated implements a two-year Lanuza Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

WHEREAS, effective and sustained governance and enforcement of marine sanctuaries in Lanuza is an essential component for the successful and meaningful implementation of the two-year Lanuza Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

WHEREAS, Executive Order 003 of the LGU, series 2011 provides for the creation of a Lanuza MPA Oversight Committee (OC) that serves as the policy-making unit of the MPA management body and outlines its composition and functions;

WHEREAS, Municipal Ordinance No. 9 – 2002 section 4 gives the exclusive jurisdiction over the marine sanctuary to the Lanuza LGU that can delegate such management responsibility to a fisher’s association but does not specifically identify the composition and the functions of the marine sanctuary management body;

WHEREAS, there is still a need to clearly delineate the policy-making and implementing components of the management body and to encourage the participation of various sectors in the management of the marine sanctuaries especially the barangay councils;

NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, and by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, I, Hon. Salvacion S. Azarcon, Mayor of Lanuza, do hereby order the following:

Section 1. CREATION and COMPOSITION. There is hereby created a Lanuza MPA Management Committee (MC) that shall serve as the implementing unit of the management body managing the Lanuza Marine Sanctuary. The MC shall serve as the implementing unit of the management body, while the OC serves as the policy-making unit. The management committee shall consist of organizational structures at the municipal and barangay levels to be composed of the following:

86

Municipal level:

1. Municipal Agriculturist or his/her representative2. Municipal Environmental Management Office (MENRO) or representative3. Municipal Planning and Development Office or representative4. Representative of the Philippine National Police (PNP) 5. Representative from each of the three barangays

Barangay level (one each for the three [3] barangays, depending on the presence of these sectors)

1. Barangay captain2. Members of the Barangay Council3. People’s Organizations(Fisherfolks Organizations)4. Chairman and representative of the BFARMC5. Representative of the Bantay dagats in the area6. School teachers7. Purok leaders8. Representative from a women’s organization in the area9. Representative of the Youth organization in the area10.Representative of the religious group in the area 11.Senior citizens12.Business organization13.NGOs operating in the area14.Tribal leaders15.Any other group that is interested

At the barangay level, only the subcommittees are expected to meet regularly. However, any member of the MC can request for a meeting of the entire MC provided the person requesting for such a meeting shall shoulder expenses of the meeting and inform barangay level chairperson.

At the inter-barangay level (3 barangays), chairpersons of the barangay MC and the chairpersons of the four (4) subcommittees in each barangay shall meet monthly.

Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The Lanuza MPA Management Committee shall enforce the rules and regulations pertaining to the protection, maintenance, and conservation of the marine sanctuaries in the municipality and supervise day-to-day operations with the following specific functions and responsibilities;

Municipal level MC:a) Prepare and implement the Lanuza MPA Annual Investment Plan and Budget based on the long-term Management Plan prepared by the Lanuza MPA OC; a) Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the Barangay, Municipal Legislative Councils and the Lanuza MPA OC;b) Supervise the conduct of regular patrolling and guarding of the MPA done by barangay and municipal enforcement teams;

87

c) Supervise the conduct of regular biophysical and socio-economic surveys; d) Conduct orientation and training workshops on MPA-related activities;e) Supervise the conduct of Information, Education and Communication Campaign;f) Prepare proposals for submission to the Lanuza MPA OC for their resource generation activities;g) Prepare activity and financial reports to be submitted to the Lanuza MPA OC;h) Coordinate with the Barangay level Management Committees;i) Perform such functions as deemed necessary

Barangay level MCsa) Conduct regular patrolling in the marine sanctuariesb) Encourage barangay governments to incorporate MPA management related activities in the barangay annual investment planc) Conduct regular biophysical and socio-economic monitoring with assistance from Lanuza MPA OCd) Conduct IEC-related activitiese) Collect user fees in accordance with the relevant municipal ordinances and remit to the MLGU their share of the collected feesf) Implement environmental-friendly livelihood activities supportive of MPA management with assistance from MLGU and national agenciesg) Maintain the patrol boat, billboards, buoys and guardhouseh) Coordinate with the municipal level MC

Section 3. OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE. The Lanuza MPA MC shall be led by the Municipal Agriculture Office. The Municipal Agriculture Office shall serve as the secretariat of the MC. The MC at the barangay level shall elect from among themselves a chairperson. The MC members shall sign up for membership in the four (4) subcommittess. The subcommittees of the MC at the barangay level shall also elect from among themselves a chairperson. The term of office of the barangay level MC chairpersons and subcommittee chairpersons shall be one year.

Section 4. REPLACEMENT OF OFFICERS. MC Officers at both the municipal and community level may be replaced by the Local Chief Executive with reasonable cause and upon recommendation of the OC. The chairperson of the MC at the barangay level can only replace a non-performing MC officer upon approval of the mayor.

Section 5. MEETINGS. The Lanuza MPA Management Committee at both the municipal and barangay levels shall meet regularly at least once a month. The MC members shall hold a regular meeting upon proper notice from the chairperson.

Section 5. MPA MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEES. As secretariat for the MC, the Municipal Agriculture Office shall coordinate the activities of the subcommittees at the barangay level. The MC at the baragay level shall consist of the following subcommittees: 1] Enforcement and Maintenance, 2] Education, 3] Resource Monitoring and Evaluation, 4] Fund Sourcing and Livelihood. The subcommittees at the barangay levels shall perform the following functions:

Enforcement and Maintenance Regular guarding and patrolling within the marine sanctuary Maintain a logbook system for the enforcement activities in the MPA Apprehension of violators of the marine sanctuary ordinance Ensure that bantay dagats are properly trained and deputized Repair and replace dilapidated/destroyed buoy/markers, patrol boats, and other infrastructure related to the MPA

88

Act as witness during court litigation

Resource Monitoring and Evaluation: Conduct regular monitoring of the biophysical status of the marine sanctuary, Conduct regular monitoring of the socio-economic status of the fishers in the area Retrieve waste and other non-biodegradable materials at the bottom of the marine sanctuary that are detrimental to the growth of corals,

Education Conduct regular information dissemination within their respective barangays regarding the MPA, Disseminate information on the different activities that are allowed and prohibited in the marine sanctuary Keep records such as management plans, financial reports, enforcement logbooks, minutes of meetings, ordinances, resolutions, pictures, videos, etc.

Fund Sourcing and Livelihood Recommend project ideas and prepare project proposals for the financial sustainability of the management of the MPA Oversee the expenditure related to MPA management based on the MPA management plan and budget Track all revenues generated by the MPA and make a report on its application Supervise the collection of user fees Oversee the implementation of livelihood activities in the area Monitor and report the progress of all livelihood projects in the area.

Section 7. SOURCES OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. The Municipal and Barangay Governments shall allocate annually funds to implement the Lanuza Marine Sanctuary Management Plan and other necessary activities of the Management Committee. The application of funds shall follow the regular government accounting procedures. The expenses incurred in the conduct of monthly meetings at the barangay level shall be shouldered primarily by the barangay government and supported by the municipal government.

Section 8. OBLIGATION OF THE BARANGAY COUNCILS. The barangay governments in Lanuza where there are marine sanctuaries are obliged to allocate funding for the management of the MPA and to support its management.

Section 9. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately upon signing hereof.”

Done this 3rd of June, 2011 at Lanuza, Surigao del Sur, Philippines.

89

HON. SALVACION S. AZARCON Municipal Mayor

1. Survey Questionnaire (insert final version of questionnaire including maps, photographs and answer sheets used for survey)

Philippines/PEP2 Reef RangersBaseline Survey (2010) and Post-campaign Survey (2012)

Hello, my name is ..................., and I am working with the ............... We are conducting a survey of people in this area about the natural environment. We would very much appreciate your participation in this survey by answering a few questions about the environment. Whatever information you provide will be kept strictly confidential and your name and answers will not be shown to or shared with any other person except for those people who are working on the survey. Your answers will help us to plan and implement a communication program.

You must be at least 15 years old in order to participate in our survey.

Participation in this survey is voluntary and you can choose not to answer any individual question or all of the questions. However, your views are important to us and I hope you will participate. May I begin the interview now?

Respondent agrees to be interviewed (If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper)

[ ] Yes

Section 1Background information filled in prior to the interview without asking the respondentInterviewer: (INSERT NAMES OF ENUMERATORS PRIOR TO PRINTING SURVEY)[ ] Interviewer #1 [ ] Interviewer #2 [ ] Interviewer #3 [ ] Interviewer #4[ ] Interviewer #5 [ ] Interviewer #6 [ ] Interviewer #7 [ ] Interviewer #8[ ] Interviewer #9 [ ] Interviewer #10 [ ] Interviewer #11 [ ] Interviewer #12[ ] Interviewer #13 [ ] Interviewer #14 [ ] Interviewer #15 [ ] Interviewer #16[ ] Interviewer #17 [ ] Interviewer #18 [ ] Interviewer #19 [ ] Interviewer #20

90

[ ] Interviewer #21 [ ] Interviewer #22 [ ] Interviewer #23 [ ] Interviewer #24[ ] Interviewer #25 [ ] Interviewer #26 [ ] Interviewer #27 [ ] Interviewer #28[ ] Interviewer #29 [ ] Interviewer #30 [ ] Interviewer #31 [ ] Interviewer #32

Barangay (ENTER NAME OF BARANGAY PRIOR TO PRINTING SURVEY):[ ] Habag [ ] Sibahay [ ] Nurcia [ ] Resident of Lanuza but not from Habag, Sibahay & Nurcia [ ] Outside of Lanuza

Enumeration area (EA):[ ] Habag -Purok 1 [ ] Habag -Purok 2 [ ] Habag -Purok 3 [ ] Habag -Purok 4 [ ] Sibahay -Purok 1 [ ] Sibahay -Purok 2 [ ] Sibahay -Purok 3 [ ] Sibahay -Purok 4

[ ] Sibahay -Purok 5 [ ] Sibahay -Purok 6 [ ] Nurcia -Purok 1 [ ] Nurcia -Purok 2 [ ] Nurcia -Purok 3 [ ] Nurcia -Purok 4 [ ] Nurcia -Purok 5 [ ] LGU Lanuza

Date (month/day/year):________________

Survey period:[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Mar 2011) [ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)Gender of respondent:[ ] Male [ ] Female

Sampling methodology [ ] TA 1: a. Fisherfolks from Habag [ ] TA 1: b. Fisherfolks from Nurcia [ ] TA 1: c..Fisherfolks from Sibahay [ ] TA 2: a. BDC From Habag, Sibahay & Nurcia [ ] TA 3: a.Barangay resident from Habag [ ] TA 3: a. Barangay resident from Sibahay [ ] TA 3: a. Barangay resident from Nurcia[ ] TA 4: Employee and local government official from LGU Lanuza

Section 2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Questions

"To begin, I would like to ask you some questions about yourself"

(1) Which of the following statements best describes you [choose whatever applies]: I am______________

[ ] Fisher near Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary [ ] Fisher in Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary [ ] Gleaner near Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary [ ] Gleaner in Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary [ ] None of the Above [ ] Community member near Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary. [ ] BDC member and MPA Manager [ ] local government official and municipal employee

91

(2) How old are you?[ ] 15 to 19 [ ] 20 to 24 [ ] 25 to 29 [ ] 30 to 34 [ ] 35 to 39 [ ] 40 to 44 [ ] 45 to 49 [ ] 50 to 54 [ ] 55 or older

(3) What is your highest educational attainment? [choose only one][ ] No school attended[ ] Primary (Grade I-IV) [ ] Intermediate (Grade V-VI)[ ] Secondary (First Year-Fourth Year) [ ] College/university [ ] Trade/vocational [ ] Refused to answer

(4) If you belong to a religion, please tell me which religion. If you do not belong to a religion, please say "none". [choose one only]

[ ] Roman Catholic [ ] Iglesia Filipina Independente (IFI)[ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo [ ] Jehovah's Witnesses [ ] Baptist [ ] Protestant [ ] Refuses to answer [ ] None[ ] Other ________________

(5) What is your primary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only][ ] Agriculture/Farming [ ] Fishing & gleaning[ ] Logging, mining, other extractive industry [ ] Small business (sari-sari store/ukay-ukay)[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Artisan (craftsmen/Souveneir shop)) [ ] Transportation (Driver) [ ] Education (Teacher) [ ] housework[ ] student [ ] Not currently employed (OSY) [ ] other private company [ ] non-governmental organisation [ ] self employed [ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national) [ ] Skilled job (mason, construction, welder, Carpenter, etc) [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(6) What is your secondary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only][ ] Agriculture/Farming [ ] Fishing & gleaning[ ] Logging, mining, other extractive industry [ ] Small business (sari-sari store/ukay-ukay)[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Artisan (craftsmen/Souveneir shop)) [ ] Transportation (Driver) [ ] Education (Teacher) [ ] housework [ ] student [ ] Not currently employed (OSY) [ ] other private company [ ] non-governmental organisation [ ] self employed [ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national) [ ] Skilled job (mason, construction, welder, Carpenter, etc) [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(7) (Ask only if they said fishing is their primary or secondary livelihood.)

Do you own a boat?[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] NA

Is it motorized or not[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] NA

Registered or not[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] NA

(8) How many people live in your household?

92

[ ] 1(me) [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ] 6 [ ] 7 [ ] 8 [ ] 9 [ ] 10 [ ] More than 10 [ ] NA

(9) What is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members last year (2010)? Again, this information will not be shared with anyone. [ ] Below 30,000 Pesos [ ] Between 30,000 and 50,000 [ ] Between 50,001 and 75,000[ ] Between 75,001 and 100,000 [ ] Greater than 100,000 Pesos [ ] Not sure [ ] Refused

(10) What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing & gleaning?[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20% [ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100%

Section 3Trusted Sources of Information & Media Access/Exposure

(11) I am going to read you a list of sources from which you might hear information about the environment, and please tell me whether you would find that source " Very trustworthy, Somewhat trustworthy, or Not trustworthy.

(A) Person on the radio[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(B) Person on television[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(C) Law enforcement official (PNP, Army)[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(D) National government (DENR, DA, BFAR, DILG) officials[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(E) LGU Lanuza officials & Employees[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(F) Religious leaders[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(G) Friends or family members[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

93

(H) Teachers[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(I) Information on poster or billboard[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(J) Information in printed materials[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(K) Information from Public meeting

[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(L) Information from School Program about environment[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(M) Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(N) Non-government organization environmental personnel (Haribon, PBPF, APREDEC, etc.)[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(O) Bantay dagat[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(P) MPA Manager[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(Q) Barangay Council[ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(R) What person would you trust the most (from list above or other) if they told you something about the environment?

[ ] person on radio [ ] person on television [ ] law enforcement official (PNP, Army) [ ] national government (DENR, BFAR, DA, DILG) official [ ] LGU Lanuza officials & Employees [ ] religious leaders [ ] friends or family members [ ] teachers [ ] information on poster or billboard [ ] information in printed booklet

94

[ ] Information from public meeting or festival [ ] Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer [ ] Non-government environmental personnel (Haribon, PBPF, etc.) [ ] Barangay councils [ ] MPA Manager [ ] Bantay Dagat [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(12) Do you have access to television at home or work?[ ] Yes [ ] No

If YES proceed to Q13, if NO proceed to Q14

(13) In the past month, would you say that you usually watched television never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or 7 days per week?

[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week ()NA

(A) Which TV stations do you watch most of the time? Please tell me up to 2 TV stations that you like to watch.

[ ] ABS-CBN [ ] Channel 5 [ ] Channel 7 GMA [ ] Channel 4 NBN [ ] Local cable station[ ] No favorite [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch[ ] Other ________________

(B) When you watch TV during the week, Monday to Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to watch TV? Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are most likely to watch.

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. [ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m. [ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen

(14) Do you have a radio at home or at work?[ ] Yes [ ] No

If YES proceed to Q 15, if NO proceed to Q 16

(15) In the past month, would you say that you usually listened to the radio never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or 7 days per week.

[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week

(A) When you listen to the radio, which radio stations are your most preferred stations? Please indicate up to 3 stations that you listen to the most.

[ ] Hot FM 88.3 (madrid) [ ] 101.1 LS FM (Cebu City) [ ] DXGY 89.1 Hot FM (Cantilan) [ ] Radio ng Bayan Tandag [ ] Infinite Radio 93.3 FM Surigao City [ ] No favorite station [ ] Don't know

95

[ ] Don't listen to the radio [ ] Other ________________

(B) When you listen to the radio, what is your favorite type of program that you like to listen to? Please indicate up to two program types that you like to listen to.

[ ] Local music (OPM) [ ] International music (Foriegn songs) [ ] News [ ] Sports [ ] Talk shows [ ] Dramas [ ] Religious [ ] No favorite [ ] Don't listen to radio [ ] Other ________________

(C) When you listen to the radio during the week, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are most likely to listen.

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. [ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m. [ ] No particular time[ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen

(D) When you listen to the radio during the weekend, Saturday and Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are likely to listen.

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. [ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m. [ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen

(16) I am going to list some different types of media programs, and I would like you to tell me how much you like each program type. Do you like it a lot, like it a little, or not like it?

(A) Tagalog Love Melodies[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(B) Local news[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(C) National news[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(D) International news[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(E) Sports (surfing)

96

[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(F) Religious programs[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(G) Dramas (radio)[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(H) Puppet shows[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(I) Locally-produced video[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(J) Music of Zandro Urbiztondo[ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(K) What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about?________________

(17) Of the following entertainers who would you listen to most if they produced a song or jingle about the environment?

[ ] Freddy Aguillar [ ] Joey Ayala [ ] Sam Milby [ ] Zandro Urbiztondo [ ] Jovit Baldivino[ ] Jim Paredes[ ] Arnel Pineda [ ] None [ ] Other ________________

Section 4Assign Respondent to Stage-of-Behavior-Change

(18) Are you a fisher or a gleaner or both (choose one only)

[ ] yes I glean [ ] yes I fish [ ] yes I glean and fish[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish [ ] N/A

(19) (If respondent said NO I don't fish and I don't glean in previous question then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have gone fishing or gleaning in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you:

97

[ ] I have never considered stopping fishing and gleaning in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary. [ ] I have considered stopping fishing and gleaning in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary but do not want to stop doing so [ ] I intend to stop fishing and gleaning in the Lanuza Marine park & Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet

[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing and gleaning in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary in the past 6 months but have not stopped yet. [ ] I have only gone fishing/gleaning in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months [ ] I have not fished/gleaned in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary in the past 6 months[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent

(20) (ask only TA1 and 2?) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements attending ManComm meetings, reef assessments, visit to to MPA guardhouse and making sure human and financial resources are available for the governance and enforcement. I would like you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represent you:

[ ] I have never considered taking part the activities listed above [ ] I have considered taking part in activities listed above but don't want to do so [ ] I intend to take part in activities listed above in the next 6 months. [ ] I have talked to someone about taking part in activities listed above in the past 6 months but have not yet taken part. [ ] I have taken part at least once in one of the listed activities (ManCom meetings, reef assessments, visits to MPA guard house and allocating financial resources).[ ] I have taken part in activities listed above several times in the last 6 months.[ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent

(21) I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have been involved in reporting of illegal activities in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary to the MPA Managers in the past 6 months. Please tell me which one is best represents you. [ ] I have never considered taking part in reporting of illegal activities in the MPA [ ] I have considered taking part in reporting of activities but don't want to do so [ ] I intend to take part in reporting of activities in the next 6 months but have not reported any yet. [ ] I have talked to someone about taking part in reporting of activities in the past 6 months but have not reported any yet.[ ] I have reported an illegal activity to the enforcement team once in the last 6 months. [ ] I reported illegal activities in the MPA twice or more in the past 6 months. [ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent

(22) I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have been involved in campaign activities of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary in the past 6 months. Please tell me which one is best represents you.

[ ] I have never considered taking part in campaign activities of the MPA [ ] I have considered taking part in campaign activities but don't want to do so [ ] I intend to take part in the campaign activities in the next 6 months but have not done so yet. [ ] I have talked to someone about taking part in campaign activities in the past 6 months but have not participated yet. [ ] I have taken part in campaign activities at least once. [ ] I have often taken part in campaign activities in the past 6 months. [ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent

Section 5Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Knowledge SMART Objectives

(23) Please state below whether you believe each regulation is either true or false as a Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Rules/Policies:

98

(A) Only members of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee need to report activities inside the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(B) No-one can fish or collect shells inside Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(C) Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(D) Using ring net in catching lobster inside the NTZ is the best way to collect[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(E) It is fine to buy fish caught using cyanide and other poisonous substances sold near the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(F) The elected officials are allowed to take fish from the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary when they visit[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(G) After five years of no fishing being allowed, the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary can be harvested again[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(H) Promotion of MPA campaign activities is the responsibility of the Municipal mayor[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(24) Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take fishing area that is going to be or has been created in your local area. A no-take fishing area is a clearly identified area where no fish are allowed to be caught at any time by anyone.(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question)COHORT QUESTION)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(B) (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as appropriate or add to other)

99

(COHORT QUESTION - need to choose format B or C for this question)[ ] more fish [ ] area for fish to reproduce [ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral / habitat for fish [ ] more fertile fish [ ] bank of the sea / food security [ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities [ ] no more destructive fishing in that area [ ] community ownership [ ] new skills [ ] better/new access to tourism [ ] better community cohesion[ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(25) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe they have been involved during the past 6 months in important management decisions, such as in determining the size and location of your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals regularly involved, occasionally involved, or never involved? (COHORT QUESTION)

(A) National Government officials[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(B) Local Government officials[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(C) Local leaders[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(D) Local fishers[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(26) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe that during the past 6 months they have been able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision makers, or not involved in decision-making?(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) National Government officials[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(B) Local Government officials[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(C) Scientists and/or fisheries experts[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

100

(D) Local leaders[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(E) Local fishers[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

Section 6Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Attitude SMART Objectives

(27) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local community if the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed:

(A) Fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(C) Illegal fishers from outside will be encouraged to come in and intrude within the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(D) The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(E) The local community will be poorer and less united when MPA is maintained[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(F) We will catch more fish if there is no enforcement at MPA[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary:

(A) Only a few people are involved with the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary management[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(B) No-one knows who is managing the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

101

(C) Local Residents know who and when guarding takes place and so are able to enter LMPS when the guards are not there[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(D) Visiting Marine biologist from Haribon say that there is more fish, but we don't see any[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(E) There is no patrol boat to chase after the illegal fishers, so the illegal fishers just come and ignore the rules knowing they won't be caught[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(F) Only men are involved in the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, so the interests and concerns of women or youth are be ignored[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(G) The Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary regulations need to be followed by all people who go into the sanctuary.[ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Unsure

(29) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? [ ] strongly do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement[ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement [ ] Unsure ()NA

(30) Which of the following statements best represents you about the presence of the Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary?[ ] I am indifferent to its presence [ ] am very proud of it [ ] I view it negatively[ ] like it [ ] am against it [ ] N/A

(31) Which of the following statements best represents you about involvement in any activities related Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary?[ ] would like to be involved [ ] I don't like to be involved [ ] I am not sure [ ] N/A

(32) What do you think of the size of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, now that they are being reduce?[ ] Too Big [ ] Too Small [ ] Just the right size [ ] Unsure [ ] N/A

(33) Who should enforce the rules and regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? (CHOOSE ALL THAT APPLY)[ ] People's Organization [ ] Fishers/Gleaners [ ] Bantay dagat (licensed enforcers) [ ] National Police [ ] Barangay officials [ ] Barangay People [ ] LGU [ ] Other ________________

(34) Whose role is to head and govern the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee? (Choose all that apply)[ ] People's Organization [ ] Fishers/Gleaners [ ] National Police [ ] Community (Barangay Community) [ ] Barangay Development Council [ ] Private sector

[ ] Academic Sector [ ] Municipal Mayor [ ] SB Chair on Agriculture/Fisheries [ ] BFAR [ ] DENR [ ] Other ________________

102

(35) Have you noticed any changes in the fish catch as a result of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)

[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same ()not sure [ ] N/A

(36) I am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find it easy or difficult for you to do that activity.

(A) Attend at least 6 meetings of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee in 12 months[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(B) Follow the rules & regulations of MPA[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(C) Attend the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Committee meeting every month[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(D) Visit the MPA guardhouse to check for any repairs needed at least once a month[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(E) Report a friend, relatives or neighbor gleaning in the MPA[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(F) Contribute ideas on the pride campaign [ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

(37) I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it.(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) There is a clear plan for how the no-take area will be managed[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(B) Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(C) Local people know boundaries of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

103

(D) There was not enough planning done before the no-take area was established[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(E) There is enough money and other resources to fully manage and enforce the rules of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(F) The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(G) The rules of the no-take area are unclear and local fishers don't understand them[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(H) The rules of the no-take area are designed more to protect the fish than to help the fishers[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(I) The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of the no-take area are adequate[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(J) There is an adequate communications program about the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(K) Staff of the no-take area are adequately trained[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(L) There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(M) Research and monitoring activities of the no take area are adequate[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(N) There are no current problems with the no-take area management[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

Section 7Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Interpersonal Communication SMART Objectives

104

(38) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in ensuring the Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary are well-managed in order to benefit the community? If you have, with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone[ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, in-laws or relatives [ ] Talked to your children [ ] Talked to friend, neighbor and fellow residents [ ] Talked to Barangay council members [ ] Talked to Non-government organizations [ ] Talked to Local government officials [ ] Talked to a Local Lanuza Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Talked to MPA managers [ ] Talked to Bantay Dagat [ ] Other ________________

(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? (do not read out options but check all that apply or fill in the blank)[ ] Increase Fish Catch [ ] Increase Income [ ] Livelihood [ ] Ecotourism Project [ ] Protect the Lanuza Sanctuary [ ] Increased in coral cover [ ] Other ________________

(39) (TA2) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in day to day operation of the MPA which include attendance in regular meetings, reef assessment and making sure financial and human resources are available of the Lanuza Marine park & Sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, in-laws or relatives[ ] Talked to your children [ ] Talked to friend, neighbor and fellow residents [ ] Talked to Barangay council members [ ] Talked to Non-government organizations [ ] Talked to Local government officials and municipal employees [ ] Talked to a Local Lanuza Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Talked to MPA managers [ ] Talked to Bantay Dagat

[ ] Other ________________

(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? (do not read out options but check all that apply or fill in the blank)

[ ] Increase of enforcement 24/7 [ ] Increase incentives of MPA managers [ ] Need to improve guardhouse [ ] Provide additional facilities [ ] Budget allocations for MANCOM meetings [ ] Increase the number of enforcement team [ ] Other ________________

(40) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, in-laws or relatives[ ] Talked to your children [ ] Talked to friend, neighbor and fellow residents [ ] Talked to Barangay council members [ ] Talked to Non-government organizations [ ] Talked to Local government officials and municipal employees [ ] Talked to a Local Lanuza Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Talked to MPA managers [ ] Talked to Bantay Dagat

[ ] Other ________________

(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? (do not read out options but check all that apply or fill in the blank) [ ] Paying fines and penalties [ ] Community service [ ] Imprisonment according to ordinance[ ] Loss face before the community [ ] Fishes completely disappear [ ] Other ________________

105

(41) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "your own role in promoting pride campaign activities"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, in-laws or relatives[ ] Talked to your children [ ] Talked to friend, neighbor and fellow residents [ ] Talked to Barangay council members [ ] Talked to Non-government organizations [ ] Talked to Local government officials and municipal employees [ ] Talked to a Local Lanuza Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Talked to MPA managers [ ] Talked to Bantay Dagat

[ ] Other ________________

(A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed? (do not read out options but check all that apply or fill in the blank) [ ] Support the campaign financially [ ] Support in distributing social marketing materials [ ] Facilitating documenting in meetings [ ] Organize event for the pride campaign [ ] Support manpower [ ] Other ________________

Section 8Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Behavior SMART Objectives

(42) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP)

(A) Subsistence fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas

106

[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(43) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 1 year (show an area that is NOT a NTZ on a map of the area but don’t mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED B (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP)

(A) Subsistence fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

107

(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(44) During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) [ ] Regularly involved [ ] Occasionally involved [ ] Never involved [ ] Don't know / not applicable

(45) In the past 12 months, have you attended any meetings/activity of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Management Committee? If so, about how many times did you attend?[ ] Never attended a meeting [ ] Attended at least 1 meeting [ ] Attended at between 2-5 meetings[ ] Attended at least 6 meetings [ ] More than 7 meetings [ ] Not applicable

(46) In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary rules & regulations to the enforcement team? [ ] Yes [ ] No ()not sure ()NA

(47) In the past six months, have you participated in any of the activities related to Lanuza Marine Park and Sanctuary?[ ] Pride campaign launch [ ] Coastal clean-up [ ] Community meeting [ ] Reporting violations [ ] () reef assessment Other ________________

(48) If you were to report someone who has broken the rules & regulations of the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary, who would you report them to? [Do not read out answers but tick all that apply.[ ] Local police [ ] Local law enforcement (Barangay Tanod)[ ] Village head/Barangay Captain[ ] Municipal mayor [ ] Next door neighbor [ ] Husband/Wife. [ ] Fishery Technician

108

[ ] Bantay Dagat [ ] Would not report [ ] Other ________________

Section 9Understand Barriers & Benefits of Behavior Change

(49) What benefits might there be in establishing a Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Committee ? (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know) [ ] more fish [ ] area for fish to reproduce [ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral / habitat for fish [ ] more fertile fish [ ] bank of the sea / food security [ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities [ ] no more destructive fishing in that area[ ] community ownership [ ] new skills [ ] better/new access to tourism[ ] better community cohesion [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(50) What barriers might there be in establishing a Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary Committee? (Write in one or more answer, None or Don’t Know) [ ] Unsupportive fisherfolks [ ] In active MPA managers [ ] Limited number of enforcement team [ ] Enforcers are easily bribed[ ] Lack of incentives [ ] Lack of patrolling and surveillance equipments [ ] Unreceptive Barangay Development Council [ ] Lack of LGU support to the MPA[ ] Lack of knowledge of community on the benefits of the MPA [ ] Other ________________

(51) If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish and glean, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? Check whatever applies.[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor Azarcon [ ] receive public recognition in the media[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta and festival [ ] receive an award [ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community [ ] more and bigger fish in the future [ ] Other ________________

(52) If you were to encourage a friend to take part in reporting any illegal activities, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? Check whatever applies.[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor Azarcon [ ] receive public recognition in the media[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta and festival [ ] receive an award [ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community [ ] more and bigger fish in the future [ ] Other ________________

Section 10Exposure to Campaign Activities & Messages

(53) I am going to ask you about a number of ways in which you may or may not have seen or heard about the Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary. For each method, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing or hearing that source in the past 6 months.

(A) Local News (Print & TV)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(B) National News (Print & TV)

109

[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(C) Religious Media Program[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(D) Local Radio Station[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(E) School Program[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(F) Locally Produced Video[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(G) Poster or Billboard[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(H) Printed Booklet[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(I) Public Meeting (Purok, etc)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(J) Local Presentation on environment[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(K) Local Cable Network[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(L) Surfing festival[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(M) Souvenir items[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(N) School supplies

110

[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

Section 11Ground truthing - no objective

(54) Please name 3 creatures that live in the sea that you are particularly fond or proud of. (do not read out options but tick box as appropriate and/or fill in the blank for any additional answers)[ ] Napoleon wrasse (Gangis) [ ] Giant clam (Takyobo) [ ] Lobster (Banagan) [ ] Grouper (Suno)[ ] Parrotfish (Molmol) [ ] Snapper (Maya-maya) [ ] Rabbitfish (Danggit) [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(A) Out of the 3 creatures you selected below. Which of the sea creatures do you like best? (show pictures)[ ] A (napoleon wrasse) [ ] B (Grouper) [ ] C (Lobster) [ ] D (Giant Clam) [ ] E (Parrotfish) [ ] F (Snapper)[ ] G (Rabbitfish)

(B) Why did you choose this creatures? (do not read out options but tick as appropriate or fill in blank)[ ] Economic Value [ ] Taste [ ] Endemic [ ] Cultural Value [ ] Colorful [ ] Abundance in the area [ ] Other ________________

(55) I am going to read you a number of strategies that might help solve any possible current problems in the management of your local no-take area. For each strategy, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that it would help solve any current problems with managing the no-take area.COHORT QUESTION

(A) Increased local community involvement in management of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(B) Limiting involvement in management of the no-take area to fishers only[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(C) Increased and strict law enforcement of the no-take area rules by Police / Navy and Enforcers[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(D) Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local community fishers with enforcement rights[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(E) Develop new rules for the no-take area in a process that includes the whole community[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(F) Change the size and/or the location of the no-take area

111

[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(G) Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to fish in the areas around the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(56) Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD, not sure/don't know (NS/DK) with the following statement:)

(A) Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my community[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree [ ] Not sure/don't know

(B) Climate change is already a prblem in my community[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree [ ] Not sure/don't know

(C) Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my community in the coming 5-10 years[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree [ ] Not sure/don't know

(D) If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some of the effects of climate change in the future[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree [ ] Not sure/don't know

(57) Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS - SELECT UP TO 3)[ ] sea level rise [ ] increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish[ ] increase of typhoon frequency [ ] increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops [ ] more people from the upland will ove to the coastal areas in case of crop failure [ ] change in weather patterns[ ] N/A[ ] Other ________________

Thank you for all of your help in responding to this anonymous questionnaire survey

2. Survey results(Refer to Result sections template in Lola, p 49-83)

112

113

Distribution of respondents in 3 Barangays according to target Audience

   Barangay

Combination of TA on Q8:Sampling methodology

TA 3: Combine communities of 3 brgys 70.4%, 833

TA 1: Combine fishers of 3 brgys 11.9%, 141

TA 4: Employee and local government official from LGU Lanuza 11.6%, 137

TA 2: Combine BDCs of 3 brgys 6.1%, 72

Habag 25.8%; 215 53.9%; 76 22.8%; 31 36.1%; 26

Sibahay 33.5%; 279 19.9%; 28 1.5%; 2 31.9%; 23

Nurcia 40.7%; 339 26.2%; 37 2.2%; 3 31.9%; 23

Resident of Lanuza but not from Habag, Sibahay & Nurcia 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 72.8%; 99 0.0%; 0

Other 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.7%; 1 0.0%; 0

Totals 100.0%; 833 100.0%; 141 100.0%; 136 100.0%; 72

Description of target audiences per Barangay  Which of the following statements best describes you [choose whatever applies]: I am______________ 

Barangay ):

Nurcia Habag SibahayResident of Lanuza but not from Habag, Sibahay & Nurcia

Outside of Lanuza

Fisher near Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary

8.0%; 32 18.6%; 65 4.2%; 14 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Fisher in Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary 0.7%; 3 0.3%; 1 0.9%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Gleaner near Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary 2.5%; 10 0.3%; 1 13.0%; 43 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Gleaner in Lanuza Marine Park & Sanctuary 1.0%; 4 0.0%; 0 3.0%; 10 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

None of the Above 64.7%; 260 32.1%; 112 40.1%; 133 11.1%; 11 0.0%; 0

Community member near LMPS. 19.7%; 79 40.7%; 142 33.4%; 111 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

BDC Member & MPA Manager 2.2%; 9 7.4%; 26 4.8%; 16 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Local Government Official & Municipal Employee 1.2%; 5 0.6%; 2 0.6%; 2 88.9%; 88 100.0%; 1

Totals 100.0%; 402

100.0%; 349

100.0%; 332 100.0%; 99 100.0%; 1

Freq Error* ±4.8% ±5.3% ±5.4% ±6.3% ±0.0%

1. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating (Insert filled in tables) (reference Lola page 161 but use revised version from Jong)

2. Met/Needs work

No. Criteria/Activity Satisfied Evidence (delete those that are not available in

the site and add additional evidence if available)

    LEVEL 1 – MPA IS INITIATED [Gisugdan ang paghunahuna sa MPA]

 

3 1 MPA concept explained and accepted [Ang concepto/hunahuna sa MPA gipasabot ug nasabtan]

nahimo ni but the documents have been lost, include all fisherfolks

(Orientation on MPAs for affected stakeholders from various sectors conducted. Social acceptance sought through community consultations /public hearings composed of representatives from various sectors) [Pagpasabot unsa ang MPA ngadto sa lain-laing sector sa katilingban. Nakuha ang pag-uyon sa katawhan pinaagi sa community consultation/public hearings nga gilangkoban sa matag sector]

1 2      Site surveyed using standard methods with baseline assessment complete, conducted in a participatory process

initially si Colin Hicks, VSO volunteer, then Haribon through Pamana-Ka sa Pilipinas.(Reports completed on fish abundance, coral cover and

profile on community and coastal management) [Kompleto ang baseline nga datos sa gidaghanon sa isda, kabag-on sa corals, kinatibuk-ang impormasyon sa katilingban, ug mga kalihokan sa pagdumala sa kabaybayonan]

3 3 Site selected with community acceptance [Napili na ang lugar tukuran sa MPA nga gikauyonan sa katilingban]

same consultations as above

(Based on PCRA with public consultations) [Gamit ang proseso sa PCRA ug Ecogov inubanan sa public consultations]

0 4      Preliminary management plan drafted [Pagpanday sa pasiunang management plan]

hindi na makita ang kopya, may plano ang asosasyon

114

(Management plan should include policies, structures & responsibilities, strategies & programs, financial plan and M&E) [Ang management plan naglangkob ug mga polisiya, istructura ug katungdanan, mga kalihokan ug programa, plano sa panalapi ug Monitoring and Evaluation]

1 5      Management body membership tentatively determined [Ang mga miembro sa Management Body nailhan na pero dili pa hingpit]

LGU (Menro) and PO at the brgy level, PO ang nag-manage sa barangay level

(Management core group starting to conduct regular meetings with proper documentation) [Ang pasiunang grupo nga magdumala nagsugod na sa pagpahigayon ug meetings ug dunay haom nga dokomentasyon]

1 6      Resolution and/or ordinance drafted [Ang resolusyon o ordinansa gipanday na]

 

1 7      Education program raising awareness about MPA functions and benefits started [Pagsugod sa programa sa edukasyon aron mapalambo ang kahibalo bahin sa kaayuhan sa MPA]

not saturated but started, pagpandilin sa pagsulod, active gears ug bawal nga managat

(Conducted a series of public education activities) [Pagpahigayon ug sunod-sunod nga nga paghatag ug pagtulon-an sa kadaghanan]

    LEVEL 2 – MPA IS ESTABLISHED [Natukod na ang MPA]  

0 8      Community acceptance gained and documented [Ang pag-dawat sa katilingban naangkon ug nakasulat]

wala kay direct sa PO ang management

(Documented through public consultation documents, e.g. barangay resolution) ) [Nakasulat kini ug miagi ug public consultation, pananglit barangay resolution]

3 9 Ordinance passed and approved by the Municipal Council [And ordinansa gipasa ug gitugotan sa Municipal Council]

Copy of ordinance

0 10 Management plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB [Ang Management plan gisagop ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod sa LGU]

Copy of management plan

115

(Adoption of management plan supported by resolution/ ordinance; plan went through community consultations with multi-sectoral stakeholders prior to approval/ legitimization) [Ang management plan gisagop pinaagi sa resolution o ordinansa; ang plano niagi ug community consultations uban ang lain-laing sector ayha pa ang pagtugot o supporta sa ordinansa]

0 11 Management body formed and functional [Ang Management body naumol na ug naglihok]

PO sa una, kinahanglang ayuhon karon

(Composition of management group and committees identified; roles & responsibilities clarified and accepted; initial meetings conducted ) [Ang naglangkob sa management group ug mga comitiba nailhan na; ang papel ug katungdana klaro ug gidawat; pasiunang panagtagbo gipahigayon]

3 12 Budget for Year 1 implementation allocated [Pagtagana ug budget para sa unang tuig nga kalihokan]

2011 - CRM 500T from MLGU, pero wala gikan sa barangay

(LGU has committed a budget for the establishment and implementation of the MPA) [Ang LGU mi-comit ug budget para sa pagtukod ug pagpatuman sa MPA]

3 13 Enforcement activities initiated [Gisugdan na ang kalihokan sa pagpatuman sa MPA]

naay 4 ka paid nga bantay dagat

(Regular guarding of the marine sanctuary initiated.)

1 14      IEC activities conducted [Ang mga kalihokan sa IEC gipahigayon na]

through community consultations

(e.g. Dissemination of MPA rules & regulations; initial stakeholder knowledge assessment conducted) [Pagpakatap sa mga balaod ug regulasyon; pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki ]

1 15      Boundaries delineated [Ang utlanan sa MPA klaro] naay kawayan nga buya….usahay makuha sa bagyo(Anchor buoys, marker buoys and/or boundary marks

installed) [Mga pataw para sa pagangkla, pataw nga timailhan sa utlanan]

116

1 16      Signboards/billboards posted [Nibarog na ang signboards ug billboards]

naay billboard sa entrance sa guardhouse sa mainland

(Should show either map/zones, rules & regulations and/or other relevant details) [Ang mga signboards/billboards nagpakita up mapa, mga balaod ug uban pang mahinungdanong detalye]

1 17      MPA outpost or other structures constructed [Ang mga katukuran alang sa pagpasikad sa balaod natokod na]

naa nay plano

(Guardhouse and/or other MPA-related structures constructed) [Ang guardhouse o uban pang klase sa katukuran nga nga dunay kahilambigitaman sa MPA]

1 18      Biophysical monitoring includes local participation [Ang pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gipahigayon uban ang local nga pag apil-apil]

trained by Haribon pero mga PO ang na-train

(Locals were trained to do biophysical surveys using standard methods) [Nabansay na ang mga local nga lumolopyo aron pagbuhat sa pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gamit ang standard nga pamaagi]

    LEVEL 3 – MPA IS ENFORCED [Ang MPA gipasikad/gipatuman]

 

1 19      Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and is accessible for MPA management [Ang budget sa LGU ug uban pang kakuhaan gitagana ug pwede makuha alang sa pagdumala sa MPA]

not done at barangay level, not done at MLGU

(There is a legal document by the LGU or an agreement with the private sector allocating budget for MPA management; financial reports being prepared and reported) [Adunay legal nga dokomento o kasabotan tali sa LGU ug pribadong sector aron pagtagana ug budget alang sa pagdumala sa MPA; and mga report sa financial nga aspeto]

0 20      Management body active and supported by legal instrument [Ang Management body actibo na ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod-legal nga documento]

Minutes of meetingsActivity reports

(Implements the management plan including enforcement and monitoring activities based on prepared annual

117

operational plan; regularly convenes for meetings; provides a venue to manage conflict or resolve issues) [Ang Management plan gipatuman-naglangkob ug enforcement-pagpasikad sa balaod ug pagbalik tan-aw nga nagsumikad sa gihan-ay nga operational plan; paghimo ug panagtigom; pagtagana ug panahon aron totkan ug solbaron ang mga issues]

0 21 Collaborative patrolling and surveillance conducted by mandated enforcement group and local community volunteers, records maintained and open to everyone [Hiniusang pagbantay ug pagmatngon gipahigayon na inubanan sa enforcement group (PNP) ug local nga voluntaryo; mga record padayon gibuhat ug abre alang sa tanan]

all paid no volunteers karon, pero wala ng volunteers karon, naay logbook

(Enforcement group supported by legal instrument; enforcement plan regularly prepared and being implemented, e.g. day/night shifts, by mandated enforcement group with assistance from local community volunteers) [Ang grupo nga tigpasikad sa balaod gipaluyohan ug balaod; dunay gisubay nga enforcement plan-adlaw gabii nga pagbantay]

1 22      MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]

brangay do this, money from MAO, Mawala ang uban panahon sa Amihan (Nov-Dec)

(Funds allocated for maintenance of enforcement support structures. May be part of municipal CRM budget) [Pondo gitagana alang sa mga katukuran kalabot sa enforcement]

0 23 Education program sustained public awareness and compliance

 

(A long term IEC program is currently being implemented in support of enforcement and the general MPA objectives)

0 24      Regular participatory biophysical monitoring being conducted [Kanunay nga pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat]

2002 to 2009 yearly data done by Haribon, stopped in 2010 because wala na ang Haribon, and those they trained left the LGU

(Documented surveys conducted at least once annually using standard methods) [Ang resulta sa survey nakasulat; gibuhat ang survey matag tuig]

0 25 Fishing effectively stopped inside the sanctuary zone [Ang panagat sulod sa MPA nahunong na]

24/7 guarding na, pero wala na record na nagsulod, pero

118

naa pay istorya nga nagasulod

(No fishing-related violations/apprehensions reported inside MPA for the past year or if violations occurred these have been prevented or duly dealt with such that no overall adverse effect on the ecosystem has resulted) [Wala nay nabalita nga nanagat; mga kalapasan o nadakpan sulod sa MPA sa milabay nga tuig; kung dunay nisulod kini napugngan aron dili makahatag ug kadaot sa dagat]

3 26 Illegal and destructive fishing reduced outside of MPA [Ang illegal ug makadaot nga panagat mikunhod gawas sa MPA]

police ug captain active outside MPA, no cases observed

(Violations/apprehensions reported at least or at minimum within 5 km from the MPA boundaries have been reduced by 80% for the past year. This Implies that baseline violation reports have been estimated or gauged or at least based on the previous year) [Mikunhod (80%) na ang nabalita nga kalapasan sulod sa 5 ka kilometro gikan sa utlanan sa MPA]

    LEVEL 4 – MPA IS SUSTAINED [Ang MPA nagmalungtaron]        0 27      MPA management plan and/or ordinance

reviewed/updated in a participatory process [Ang management plan ug ordinansa gibalikan ug tan-aw inubanan ang processo sa katilingban]

Copy of amendments

(Management plan and/or ordinance amended with the participation of various stakeholders) [Ang management plan ug ordinansa giamendahan uban ang pagapil-apil sa kadaghanan]

1 28      Budget from LGU or from other sources is being allocated and accessed for 2 or more consecutive years [Ang budget gikan sa LGU ug uban pang kakuhaan gitagana ug pwede magamit sulod sa duha ug daghang pang katuigan nga pagpatuman sa pagdumala]

Financial reportsCopy of contracts

(Financial reports being regularly prepared, audited and reported; proper procurement & contracting procedures are strictly being followed and transparent, e.g. reports are accessible and reported) [Ang mga report pinansiyal giandam sa kanunay; haom/sakto ug klaro nga pagpamalit ug gamit-nagsubay sa balaod; and reports makita sa tanan]

0 29      Management body capable to run the MPA independently [Ang Management body adunay kahanas sa pagpadagan sa pagdumala sa MPA]

Performance assessments

119

(Management body supervises/facilitates management activities [enforcement, budgeting & financial management, M&E, IEC, etc.] and coordinates activities with partners) [Ang management body mao ang nangulo sa mga kalihokan sa pagdumala ug pakiglambigit sa mga partners-pagpasikad sa balaod, pagdumala sa pondo]

0 30 Enforcement system fully operational [Ang pagpasikad sa balaod hingpit nga naglihok]

Enforcement reports

(Mandated enforcement group implementing regularly prepared enforcement plan; enforcement support structures maintained & patrolling activities sustained for 2 consecutive years or more; effective reporting system in place) [Ang grupo nga gitahasan sa balaod kanunay nag andam ug enforceement plan; giatiman ang mga katukuran (guardhouse ug pumpboat ug uban pa) ug namalahutayon ang sulod sa duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; epektibong nga pagbalita sa mga panghitabo]

1 31      MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]

PhotographsOcular survey

(Site development structures and equipment maintained for 3 consecutive years or more)[Giatiman ang mga billboard ug mga buya]

0 32 Performance of management body regularly monitored and evaluated with community/stakeholder participation [Ang dagan sa pagdumala sa management body kanunay gisubay ug balikan ug tan-aw inubanan sa katilingban]

Performance assessment reports

(Performance monitoring program in place and conducted regularly for 2 consecutive years or more; reporting system for ordinary citizens to complain w/o fear of consequences available and widely known) [Natukod na ang programa sa pag monitor ug gibuhat kada duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; adunay reporting system sa mga mulo sa katawhan ]

0 33      Annual participatory biophysical monitoring and timely feedback of results being implemented for 2 consecutive years or more, monitoring team accountable for reliability of results [after 2 years from establishment or the baseline reference up to the evaluation period] [Tinuig nga pagbalik tan-aw sa estado sa buhilaman sa dagat-kini

nahunong ng mawala na ang haribon

120

gibuhat sulod sa duha ka tuig o daghang pang katuigan; ang monitoring team mao ang mupahigayon aron insakto and datos nga mareport ug makuha](Documented surveys using standard methods; reports available; results posted in billboards) [Nakasulat ang mga resulta sa survey gamit ang standard methods; and mga reports mabasa ug kini nakapatik sa mga billboards]

0 34      Socio-economic monitoring regularly conducted, monitoring team accountable for timely feedback and reliability of results

Monitoring reports

(Fisheries and/or socio-economic variables being regularly monitored by local monitoring team; data summaries/reports are available and easily accessible)

1 35      Environment friendly enterprise and/or fees collected as a sustainable financing strategy

sancutary café run by LGU

(Environment-friendly products/goods sold to tourists, impose collection of user-fees, etc.)

0 36 Illegal and destructive activities stopped inside and within the vicinity of MPA

 

(No violations/apprehensions reported inside and within 5 km of the MPA boundary or violations prevented or duly prosecuted and sanctioned for 2 consecutive years or more)

    LEVEL 5 – MPA IS INSTITUTIONALIZED  0 37      Formal commitment from the Provincial Council giving

MPA stronger political support 

(Gives MPA institutional support to strengthen enforcement and collaboration)

0 38      Management plan refined with stakeholder participation for adaptive management

 

(Incorporates further refinements after gaining much experience and lessons to improve strategies)

0 39 MPA management plan including budgetary requirements incorporated in the LGU development plan

Copy of LGU long-term development plan

(MPA incorporated within the long-term LGU area-wide development plan)

0 40      Management body capacitated for fund sourcing ProposalsLetters to funding agencies(Can prepare and submit proposals to seek financial

assistance from external sources e.g. funds sourced by local management bodies)

121

1 41      Effective coordination with appropriate national & local agencies on CRM/MPA policies and with other LGUs achieved; accountabilities and working relationships among collaborating institutions clearly defined and formalized

LBDA, Haribon, GIZ

(Coordination on implementation and resolution particularly of issues that transcend local boundaries including MPA networking with other MPAs etc.)

0 42      Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts conducted and feedback mechanisms are in place

Assessment reports

(Assessment of resource status and long-term trends conducted; Analysis of change in local economy and long-term trends of user groups conducted; Reports of these studies have been completed and reported back to stakeholders and/or conference or symposia)

0 43 Performance M&E linked to an incentive system regularly conducted

Assessment reports

(Recognition/awards are regularly being given to outstanding members, law enforcers, etc.; incentives can also include priority for granting of available loans or alternative livelihood opportunities; feedback mechanisms for the communities such as suggestion box, complaint desk in the LGU, village assembly, are available)

0 44 IEC program on MPAs sustained over the years  (Information dissemination activities sustained according to long-term IEC program; citizens can conveniently access MPA-related info and LGU-disseminated materials such as minutes of meetings, leaflets, etc.)

0 45      Advanced IEC materials developed and disseminated with assistance from partners and/or private sector grants (e.g. video production)

 

0 46 MPA emphasizes on public education and is being used as a study tour site, residents advocate for MPAs

 

(After much experience, members are ready to share learnings and impart knowledge; presence of identified group that conducts tours and capable of giving talks on MPAs; paper/s written on their success stories published)

0 47      Expansion strategies or enhancement programs initiated

 

122

(MPA coverage is expanded, e.g. from a sanctuary to a park; or scope of conservation activities is heightened, e.g. coral reef restoration, culturing of clams, etc)

1 48      Support facilities constructed/added sanctuary café as information center(E.g. tourism facilities, guardhouse expanded into an

education/training center, etc.)0 49      Revenues from enterprise and/or fees sustained and

accounted for10T per year income ball park figure

(Existing sustainable financing mechanisms are well-managed and well-documented; financial reports easily accessible)

MPA LevelYear

requirement met

Total Score per

level

Thresholds

MPA level satisfied?

Total threshold score per

level

Actual threshold score

All threshold indicator

s satisfied?

1 - InitiatedAt least 6 monthsAt least 8 total cumulative scoreAll Level 1 thresholds met

2011 10 6 6 yes yes

2- EstablishedAt least 1 yearAt least 24 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1 & 2 thresholds met

14 21 15 no no

3 - EnforcedAt least 3 yearsAt least 38 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1,2 & 3 thresholds met

5 36 18

123

4- SustainedAt least 5 yearsAt least 50 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1, 2, 3 & 4 thresholds met

3 45 18

5 - InstitutionalizedAt least 7 yearsAt least 66 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level `1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 thresholds met

2 57 18

Total cumulative score (out of 85)

34

3. Letters of Support (Insert any letters of support for the campaign by key partners, politicians etc) (reference Lola p 169)

4. Threat Ranking(Insert jpeg from your Miradi threat ranking with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference Serena island p35)

124

5. Factor Chain(Insert jpeg from your Miradi factor chains with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference Serena island p38)

125

126