Pep Presentation For Linked In 2008
description
Transcript of Pep Presentation For Linked In 2008
The PEP….The PEP….The Right Choice!The Right Choice!
Presented by:
Chris WicklundChris Wicklund Sales ManagerSales Manager
Why Should You Use The PEP?Why Should You Use The PEP?
Reduce Turnover! Help Identify High Risk Applicants Make Your Manager’s Job EASIER! Reduce Interviewing Time Guide Your Reference Checking Create Uniform Hiring Standards
Throughout the Company!
Personnel Evaluation Profile Personnel Evaluation Profile (PEP)(PEP)
(2) Distortion/Falsification Critical Items Honesty Reporting Dishonesty Socialization/People Skills Customer Service
Features 13 Scales – More Than Other Features 13 Scales – More Than Other Testing Companies OfferTesting Companies Offer
Personnel Evaluation Profile Personnel Evaluation Profile (PEP)(PEP)
Drug Use & Attitudes Employment Background Work Ethic Absenteeism Tardiness Overall Scale
Features 13 Scales – More Than Other Features 13 Scales – More Than Other Testing Companies OfferTesting Companies Offer
Automatic Verbal Automatic Verbal InterpretationInterpretation
We call your hiring officials to discuss every result. It’s like getting a “Free” HR consultant!
These “Verbals” are designed to point out “red flags” or inconsistencies in the applicant’s statements.
A fail-safe for managers that overlook or dismiss testing results.
Other PEP AdvantagesOther PEP Advantages
Distortion ScalesDetailed Report outlines 27
subcategoriesSpanish & Canadian versions
availableElectronic Application Integration Integrates with other HR & Payroll
Packages
Corporate ReportsCorporate Reports
Free Automated Summary Reports – emailed to you, breaking down store by store, applicant by applicant (weekly/ monthly/quarterly)
Free Compliance Reports – help ensure all hiring officials are using the PEP and are meeting company standards. (It will even tell you whether store managers are administering the profile POST-HIRE!)
Free EEOC/Validation Studies
Based on $8/hr. employee
Source Turnover Cost
Society for Human $3,500 Resource Management
American Management Assoc. $4,800
Coca-Cola Retailing Research $3,637 Council – Supermarket Industry
American Hotel & Motels Assoc. $4,100
Experts Agree: Turnover Experts Agree: Turnover Costs Are HighCosts Are High
Pre-Employment Screening Pre-Employment Screening Methods: Comparison of CostsMethods: Comparison of Costs
12
42
30
50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
PEP* CriminalChecks
ReferenceChecks
Drug Testing
PEP*
Criminal Checks
Reference Checks
Drug Testing
( * 6-20 )PEP RATES RANGE FROM $ EACH
Effectiveness in ScreeningEffectiveness in Screening
0
1020
304050
607080
90
PEP CriminalChecks
ReferenceChecks
DrugTesting
Effectiveness in ScreeningEffectiveness in Screening
Police Department Study
A major metropolitan police department administered the Personnel Evaluation Profile (PEP) to 179 candidates for the positions of: police officer, police aide, parking checker and office administration in order to evaluate the PEP as an effective aid in background investigations.
Investigators established 21 ‘Areas of Concern’ (AOC). These areas covered employment, military, credit and criminal histories as well as honesty and integrity issues.
Effectiveness in ScreeningEffectiveness in Screening
Police Department Study, cont’d.
Part One: The background officers completed background investigations on a portion of the 179 applicants WITHOUT the results from the PEP. An average of 5.75 AOC’s (areas of concern) per applicant were identified.
Part Two: The same officers were provided with PEP results prior to conducting their background checks on the remaining applicants. An average of 7.58 AOC’s per applicant were identified, reflecting a 32% increase in disqualifying data.
Effectiveness in ScreeningEffectiveness in Screening
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 2 5-6 9-10 13-14
% Score On PEP
“OR” Scale
Police Department Study, cont’d.
Number of Total Admissions
Effectiveness in ScreeningEffectiveness in Screening
Police Department Study, cont’d.
In particular, the ‘Overall Recommendations’ & ‘Employment Background’ scales were highlighted as being very helpful in identifying ‘high risk’ candidates.
Regarding candidates rated as having poor employment history by the background investigator… 86% of these applicants scored 36% or less on the ‘Employment Background Scale’ of the PEP.
The average ‘Overall Recommendation’ percentage score for accepted applicants was 60%, while the average ‘Overall Recommendation’ percentage for rejected applicants was 42%.
We We WillWill Reduce Reduce TurnoverTurnover
A 120 unit convenience store chain conducted an internal study, looking at both turnover and cost-savings generated when using the PEP program. This company estimated $1000 per person for hiring costs. After the first complete year of PEP usage, they found a 35% improvement in turnover, dropping from 276% to 180%, that equalled a savings of $1,021,000 in hiring costs!
By the end of the next year, turnover had been reduced to only 119% - a 34% improvement over the previous year. This led to another $725,000 savings in turnover costs!
We We WillWill Reduce Reduce TurnoverTurnover
This company’s expenditure on the PEP was $53,339 over a two year period. Their Return On Investment (ROI) was nearly $2.7 Million.
They also saw a direct correlation between their shrink reduction and turnover reduction numbers.
We We WillWill Reduce Reduce TurnoverTurnover
A 44 store grocery and convenience store chain in the Northeast conducted an internal study, looking at both turnover and cost-savings generated when using the PEP program. After the first complete year of PEP usage, turnover was reduced from 54.28% to 45.86%. This company estimated $1500 per person for hiring costs.
In turn, the 15.52% reduction in turnover generated a savings of over $1 Million to the bottom line operating budget!
Turnover StudyTurnover Study
A major wholesale/retail grocery company found an 11.25% decrease in turnover after implementing the PEP program.
In addition, supervisors stated that they were happier with the quality of worker being hired after implementing the PEP program.
Turnover StudyTurnover Study
A study conducted by a 70+ location specialty retailer found a 70% reduction in “For Cause” firings after having the PEP in place for 2 years.
NEW YORK WIRE SERVICENEW YORK WIRE SERVICE
Has test been validated? Is the test fair? If faced with legal
challenge, will publisher help?
Three basic questions should be asked of a “good” test publisher:
PEP Response:
– Yes– Yes– Yes
LEGALITIES / EEOCLEGALITIES / EEOC
In accordance with EEOC/ADA guidelines Age, race, and gender studies have shown
no adverse impact Submitted to EEOC; no negative findings or
determinations Favorably reviewed by
attorneys specializing in employment law
Ease of AdministrationEase of Administration
Average of 20-25 minutes for applicant to complete
Fax, internet, phone scoring, or hand-held kiosks available
Results returned automatically via fax, email, kiosk, or phone
1-3 minute turnaround
Typical Examples of Bad Typical Examples of Bad Applicants Applicants
(Are Your Managers Hiring (Are Your Managers Hiring These Applicants??)These Applicants??)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DIS 13/15 66
BL 7/7 100
CI 14/14 100
E 21/36 8
R 9/13 17
S 8/16 14
D 10/11 41
EB 17/19 69
WE 15/22 13
M 10/10 100
T 9/11 26
OR 45/60 20
PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILE (PEP)Management Printout
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1993, 1995
by Personnel Evaluation, Inc
Applicant : MR. $150 THEFTDate Processed: July 30th, 1997
Control Number: 299038 XYZ Company
APPLICANT’S PROFILE
DIS = Distortion E = Ethics D = Drugs M = Absenteeism
BL = Blatant Distortion R = Reporting Theft EB = Employment Background T = Tardiness
CI = Criminal Items S = Socialization WE = Work Ethic OR = Overall Recommendation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DIS 14/15 84
BL 6/7 59
CI 13/14 25
E 26/36 33
R 11/13 43
S 10/16 43
D 8/11 12
EB 15/19 39
WE 11/22 1
M 8/10 42
T 9/11 29
OR 46/60 31
PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILE (PEP)Management Printout
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1993, 1995
by Personnel Evaluation, Inc
Applicant : MISS $500 DISCOUNTDate Processed: July 29th, 1997
Control Number: 298986 XYZ Company
APPLICANT’S PROFILE
DIS = Distortion E = Ethics D = Drugs M = Absenteeism
BL = Blatant Distortion R = Reporting Theft EB = Employment Background T = Tardiness
CI = Criminal Items S = Socialization WE = Work Ethic OR = Overall Recommendation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DIS 14/15 84
BL 6/7 59
CI 13/14 25
E 14/36 2
R 0/13 0
S 5/16 4
D 7/11 6
EB 19/19 100
WE 13/22 4
M 7/10 24
T 9/11 29
OR 36/60 7
PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILE (PEP)Management Printout
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1993, 1995
by Personnel Evaluation, Inc
Applicant : MISS $275 PRODUCT THEFTDate Processed: July 29th, 1997
Control Number: 298973 XYZ Company
APPLICANT’S PROFILE
DIS = Distortion E = Ethics D = Drugs M = Absenteeism
BL = Blatant Distortion R = Reporting Theft EB = Employment Background T = Tardiness
CI = Criminal Items S = Socialization WE = Work Ethic OR = Overall Recommendation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DIS 14/15 84
BL 7/7 100
CI 14/14 100
E 18/36 7
R 5/13 5
S 10/16 43
D 6/11 4
EB 19/19 100
WE 14/22 8
M 7/10 24
T 9/11 29
OR 40/60 13
PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILE (PEP)Management Printout
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1993, 1995
by Personnel Evaluation, Inc
Applicant : MISS $700 THEFTDate Processed: July 29th, 1997
Control Number: 298969 XYZ Company
APPLICANT’S PROFILE
DIS = Distortion E = Ethics D = Drugs M = Absenteeism
BL = Blatant Distortion R = Reporting Theft EB = Employment Background T = Tardiness
CI = Criminal Items S = Socialization WE = Work Ethic OR = Overall Recommendation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DIS 14/15 84
BL 7/7 100
CI 11/14 3
E 20/36 10
R 10/13 31
S 5/16 4
D 7/11 6
EB 16/19 54
WE 7/22 0
M 6/10 13
T 8/11 14
OR 39/60 11
PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILE (PEP)Management Printout
Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1993, 1995
by Personnel Evaluation, Inc
Applicant : MISS $1800 DISCOUNTDate Processed: July 28th, 1997
Control Number: 298945 XYZ Company
APPLICANT’S PROFILE
DIS = Distortion E = Ethics D = Drugs M = Absenteeism
BL = Blatant Distortion R = Reporting Theft EB = Employment Background T = Tardiness
CI = Criminal Items S = Socialization WE = Work Ethic OR = Overall Recommendation
Validation Validation StudyStudy
91.4 %88.6 %35Receiving Stolen Property
84.1 %65.9 %170Falsified Employment Application
90.2 %78.0 %41Current Drug Admission
% of Applicants Who “Failed” PEP* or Who
Falsified the PEP
% of Applicants
Who “Failed” PEP*
# of Admissions Received in Interviews
Rejection Criteria
Based on 245 applicants interviewed at a job fair.
* A “Fail” constitutes a score of 36% or lower on the Overall Recommendation Scale. (Note how important a good distortion scale is in identifying high-risk applicants.)
Validation Validation StudyStudy
93.5 %87.1 %62Theft Admission
86.2 %82.8 %29Substantially Related Undetected Crime
83.3 %69.7 %66Substantially Related Criminal Record
% of Applicants Who “Failed” PEP* or Who
Falsified the PEP
% of Applicants
Who “Failed” PEP*
# of Admissions Received in Interview
Rejection Criteria
•A “Fail” constitutes a score of 36% or lower on the Overall Recommendation Scale. (Note how important a good distortion scale is in identifying high-risk applicants.)
Based on 245 applicants interviewed at a job fair.
What is “Personnel What is “Personnel Evaluation, Inc.” Evaluation, Inc.” ??
In business for over 30 years
In business for nearly 40 yearsWe provide:
– Written Pre-Employment Assessments, featuring the PEP, since 1988
– Background Checks– Polygraphs– Secret Shopping– Staffing Services– Honesty At Work Hotline
Our Guarantee To YouOur Guarantee To You
o We will work hand-in-hand with your hiring officials to make better hiring decisions.
o We will reduce turnover.
o We will help identify most high-risk applicants before they are hired.
o Ask about our 100% money back guarantee during our trial periods.
Hire Smart!Hire Smart!
For more information regarding
Personnel Evaluation’s services,call 1-888-734-3988