Gunnar Misund1 REAL TIME MANAGEMENT OF MASSIVE 2D DATASETS Gunnar Misund.
People in a painted landscape Gunnar Malmberg Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of People in a painted landscape Gunnar Malmberg Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå...
People in a painted landscape
Gunnar Malmberg
Department of Social and Economic Geography,
Umeå University, Sweden
The Project: “Away from the periphery”•Place making, place discourses and migration in Swedish peripheries.•Peripheries have been in focus in public debates•Focus on the North
This Study •Migration and place making in an area in Southern Sweden•Illustrate interrelations between mobility and place representations•Back-ward area Periphery Unique idyll•Migration and representations of rurality•The role of the painters•The making of “Österlen”
John Jörgensson Eugen Frans Lindberg
Empirical analyses
• Analyses of different populations and their mobility
– Permanent residents
– Temporary and permanent migrants
– Second home owners
– Tourists
• Analyses of their different relations to places
• Analyses of the representations of places
– Paintings
– Films
– Literature
– Advertisement
– Geographical and ethnographical studies
Densely and highly urbanised western
Skåne 840.000 inhabitants
Peripheralsouth-eastern
Skåne35.000 inhabitants
Skåne; the densely populated South,
0 km 80 km
• Stigmatised as a back-ward area
– “People are slow to adjust”
– “People are keen to follow the traditions of their ancestors”
• Modernization and industry came late
• No regional identity
• “Österlen” used by outsiders
A “backward” rural area
Frans Lindberg
Making the Periphery
• Centre – periphery was created by the urbanisation and industrialisation
• But also by geographers, planners and others who conceptualised this process.
• Hägerstrand’s migration studyfrom 1949 “the flight from the small town”
• The stereotyped periphery
• Self-peripherization, local politicians and local population
Source: Hägerstrand (1949)
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
South East Skåne Malmö Lund Skåne
Population decline in the peripheral region
The periphery of south-east Skåne• Higher share of elderly than in other parts of southern Sweden• High out-migration rates• High unemployment rate
But the area is known to most Swedes as ..
”Österlen”• An attractive rural idyll• Home and second home of many intellectuals and artists
The making of the “Österlen” as unique idyll
Major actors:– The local elite – Intellectual inmigrants
– The naming process, initiated by the local elite• Reintroduced the name “Österlen” and delimited the area• Used by the outsiders - “painters” and second home
owners
– “Österlen” was represented as an rural idyll
The Painters
• Pioneer painters already in the late 1800s
• “The light in Österlen”
• The “continental” landscape in Sweden
• The pioneers attracted other to follow
• A colony of temporary or permanent painters was established in 1950s
• These painters were important place-makers
Gummeson
Wihlborg
•The landscape represented in the paintings was an attractive rural idyll
•The rural idyll was located to a specific place, “Österlen”
When painted in oil and exhibited in the galleries, the peripheral landscape, of large plains, hamlets and fishing villages, was converted into an attractive idyll
The artists and intellectuals had the symbolic capital and social capital to define the attractive place
Eugen
Other “painters” followed
• Filmmakers
• Authors
• Composers
• Rock stars
who reproduced the idyllic landscape
and became and attraction that triggered others to come to Österlen
Reproducing the idyllic landscape
• Art exhibitions
• Invasion of art galleries and cafés
• Summer theatres
• Music festivals
• “Painting” and renovating houses in the old style
The residents of Österlen found themselves living in a painted landscape- in a rural idyll,
as reproducers of the rural idyll
or as exotic inhabitants in that idyll.
“They say it’s a beautiful area, but we cannot see it”local rural worker
EugenJohn Jörgensson
The unique idyll attracted new populations
• Second home owners– High share of houses are second homes (36 %)
– High share owned by non-residents (85 %)
– High share of second home owners from Stockholm (25%)
• Inmigration of permanent residents– Still quite low
– High share coming from Stockholm
• Tourism– Increasing tourism over the years
Two place discourses:• South East Skåne
– the stereotyped periphery
• Österlen
- the unique idyll
•Part of the everyday life
•Influence values and behaviour
•Structure people’s life opportunities•More for the locally tied residents•Less for the mobile
Eugen
Some conclusions
• Planners, geographers and others formed the discourse about the periphery
• “The painters” and the local elite formed the discourse about the unique idyll
• They had the symbolic capital to influence the place discourses
• While most permanent residents were less powerful to influence it
• However, both these discourses could also be in the interests of the permanent resident population