Penggunaan Aplikasi “Carbon Calculator Low Carbon Cities ... · 04/04/2016 · Penggunaan...

Penggunaan Aplikasi “Carbon Calculator Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF)”

SGGSD2020 - Seminar Sepang Ke Arah Pembangunan Mampan & Pertumbuhan Hijau 2020

Cyberview Resort & Spa

26 Nov 2013

Outline of LCCF

1. Overview 2. Application 3. Evaluation 4. Data Collection 5. Case Studies 6. Summaries

LCCF Overview

WHAT IS LOW CARBON CITIES? 2

4

Low Carbon Cities can be defined as a city that comprises of societies that consume sustainable green technology, green practices and emit relatively low carbon or GHG as compared with present day practice to avoid the adverse impacts on climate change.

A Low Carbon City (LCC) uses green technologies and sustainable method in the development and operation of the city.

They meet the diverse needs of existing and future residents, are

sensitive to their environment, and contribute to a high quality of life

They are safe and inclusive, well planned, built and managed, and offer equality in opportunity and good urban services for all

2

5

Its planning and implementation must involved all key stakeholders.

6

What is Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF)? The Low Carbon Cities Framework & Assessment System is a national framework and assessment system developed by KeTTHA to guide and assist our stakeholders such as developers, local councils, town planners, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) and the public to lower the levels of carbon emission in our cities towards achieving sustainable urban developments.

Why we need Low Carbon Cities? To support the government policy in reducing 40% of carbon emission per GDP per capita by the year 2020.

When it starts? Since Year 2010 after the launching of National Green Technology Policy & Budget Speech 2010

Who is involves? KeTTHA and MGTC act as the project owner and manager respectively. Representatives from MIP and carbon experts consultants develop the LCCF framework and carbon calculator.

Where to implement? Malaysian municipal council, universities, developers and communities How to Implement? By formulating baseline studies via data collection, stakeholders consultation and action plan or roadmap by each applicants. Implementation started after the roadmap has been completed of which final certificate shall be given after 1 or 2 year(s) period has lapsed.

MALAYSIA. Where are we?

Mt. of CO2 emissions (per capita) in 2008

Source: International Energy Statistic

Which far exceeds the average Asia Pacific CO2 balance of:

2.6 Mt. of CO2 emissions (per capita)

Source: Malaysian Statistic & International Energy Statistic

Source: World Resource Institute

7.1

“It is my dream that one day we can live in a clean, healthy and high quality environment, where cities, townships and communities are built on the fundamentals of Green Technology” YAB Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Razak

MALAYSIA’s COMMITMENT

“…Malaysia is adopting an indicator of a voluntary reduction of up to 40% in terms of emissions intensity of GDP by the year 2020 compared to 2005 levels.” YAB Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Razak

Emission Reduction Target

(ERT)

40 % reduction of carbon

intensity per GDP per capita by

2020

CITIES AND GHG EMISSION

Building sector represents 40% of the world’s energy consumption and contributes to one-third of GHG emissions.

Energy Consumption

If you want to tackle Climate Change – Tackle the Cities More than 50% of world’s population Consumes for 75% of world’s energy consumption Responsible for 80% of GHG emission

“CO2 is the most important anthropogenic of GHG and the main sources of atmospheric CO2 is from burning of fossil fuels – 75% of increase in atmospheric CO2 since industrial times (Source: Cities and Climate Change – Global Report on Human Settlements 2011, UN-Habitat).

Cities/Urban Areas Emit GHG :Sources of Green House Gas

THE LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK

• To encourage & promote the concept of low carbon cities and townships in Malaysia.

• To increase the compatibility of cities/townships with their local natural system.

• To guide cities in making choice/decisions towards greener solutions.

Objective of Low Carbon Cities

Framework (LCCF)

• All Cities & Townships in Malaysia Users

• To reduce carbon emission intensity by 40% per GDP per capita by the year of 2020

Targets

Local authorities, township developers, planners, consultants and individuals ~ in assessing whether developments carried out within the city contributes towards the reduction or decrease in GHG

POLICIES AND COMMITMENTS

FOR CO2 REDUCTION OF

40%

STRATEGIES KEY TARGETS BY

SECTORS PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS NATIONAL ASSESSMENT

TOOLS & GUIDELINE

RATING/ DESIGN TOOLS BY RELATED INDUSTRIES

GREEN BUILDING INDEX BREEAM (UK)

LEEDS (US & CANADA) GREENMARK (SINGAPORE) GEENSTAR (AUSTRALIA)

1 From Policy to Implementation

40 % reduction of carbon emission per GDP per capita

by 2020

CITIES & TOWNSHIP : GREEN TECH MALAYSIA / FEDERAL DEPT TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING DEPT/ LOCAL GOVT /DEVELOPERS/ KEY STAKEHOLDERS

BUILDINGS : GOVERNMENT AGENCIES & INDUSTRY PLAYERS

POLICY : GOVERNMENT MALAYSIA - KeTTHA / KKR / NRE / Other Ministries

Sustainable Framework for Low Carbon Cities

SUSTAINABLE FRAMEWORK

ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

GREEN RATING TOOLS

ASPECTS

URBAN ENVIRONMENT BUILDING URBAN

INFRASTRUCTURE URBAN

TRANSPORTATION

Governance

Economy Services Transport & Mobility

Natural & Built Environment

LOW CARBON CITY

Community Well Being

Equality & Diversity

GHG INDEX

LIVABILITY INDEX

MISSION (40% GHG REDUCTION)

PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARD

TARGET

ROADMAP

Nat

iona

l A

sses

smen

t Too

ls

National Policy

Rating Tools

KEY ELEMENTS

GREEN NEIGHBOURHOO

D GUIDELINES

GAP/ STATUS

Element of lifecycle costs

Urban Environment

Urban Transportation

Urban Infrastructure Buildings

4 Elements for GHG Reductions in Cities and Townships

Elements Contribute to GHG emission

13 Performance Criteria*

35 Sub Criteria

*Performance Criteria are measurable strategies to reduce carbon emission through:- Policy control, technological dev., better process & product management, change in procurement system, carbon capture, consumption strategies & others.

• Shift of Transport Mode

• Green Transport Infrastructure

• Green Vehicles • Traffic Management

• Site Selection • Urban Form • Urban Greenery & Air

Quality

• Infrastructure Provision

• Waste • Energy • Water

• Low Carbon Building

• Community Service

Performance Criteria for LCCF

Performance Criteria for Urban Environment

ELEMENT 1: URBAN

ENVIRONMENT

UE 1 : SITE SELECTION

UE 2 : URBAN FORM

UE 3 : URBAN GREENERY & ENV. QUALITY

3 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

14 SUB CRITERIA

UE 1 : Site Selection

UE 2 : Urban Form

UE 3 : Urban Greenery And Environmental Quality

1-1: Development within defined urban footprint 1-2: Infill development within existing urban footprint 1-3: Development within transit nodes and corridor 1-4: Brownfield and Grey field redevelopment 1-5: Hilly slope development

2-1: Mixed-use development 2-2: Compact development 2-3: Road and parking 2-4: Comprehensive pedestrian network 2-5: Comprehensive cycling network 2-6: Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects

3-1: Preserve natural ecology, water body and bio-diversity 3-2: Green open space 3-3: Number of trees

Performance Criteria For Urban Transportation

UT 2 : Green Transport Infrastructure

UT 1 : Shift of Transport Mode

UT 4 : Traffic Management

UT 3 : Clean Vehicles

1-1: Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) dependency

2-1: Public transportation 2-2: Walking and cycling

3-1: Low carbon public transportation 3-2: Low carbon private transportation

4-1: Vehicle speed management 4-2: Traffic Congestion and traffic flows management

ELEMENT 2: URBAN

TRANSPORTATION UT 1 : SHIFT OF TRANSPORT MODE UT 2 : GREEN TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE UT 3 : CLEAN VEHICLES

UT 4 : TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

4 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

7 SUB CRITERIA

Performance Criteria For Urban Infrastructure

1-1: Land take for infrastructure and utility services 1-2: Earthworks management 1-3: Urban storm water management and flood mitigation

UI 2 : Waste

UI 3 : Energy

UI 4 : Water Management

UI 1 : Infrastructure Provision

2-1: Construction and industrial waste management 2-2: Household solid waste management

3-1: Energy optimization 3-2: Renewable Energy 3-3: Site wide district cooling system

4-1: Efficient Water Management

ELEMENT 3: URBAN

INFRASTRUCTURE

UI 1 : INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION

UI 2 : WASTE

UI 3 : ENERGY

UI 4 : WATER MANAGEMENT

4 PERFORMANCE

CRITERIA

9 SUB CRITERIA

Performance Criteria For Building

1-1: Operational energy emissions 1-2: Operational water consumption 1-3: Emission abatement through retrofitting 1-4: Building orientation 2-1: Shared facilities and utilities within building

B1 : Low Carbon Buildings

B2 : Community Building

ELEMENT 4: BUILDING

B 1 : LOW CARBON BUILDINGS

B 2 : COMMUNITY BUILDING

2 PERFORMANCE

CRITERIA

5 SUB CRITERIA

LCCF Application

ASSESSMENT APPROACH TO ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION

A O

ne S

yste

m A

ppro

ach •Enables users to

realize benefits of integration by planning, designing and managing the whole urban system

•E.G.: Yokohama waste reduction programme (estimated total waste reduction for fiscal years 2001-2007 is 623,000 tons which leads to reduction of 840,000 tons of CO2 A

Cit

y B

ased

App

roac

h •Enables users to lead a development process that consider their specific circumstances including ecology

•E.G.: Stockholm (an old inner city industrial area transform into an attractive and ecologically sustainable district through an integrated and collaborative planning and management)

A One System Approach

A City Based Approach

User can opt to undertake a One-System Approach or a City-based

Approach depending on their objective and capacity.

METHODOLOGY AND

APPROACHES

STEP 1 Identify Key Stakeholders STEP 2

Identify Roles and

Responsibilities of

Stakeholders

STEP 3 Develop Project

Strategy STEP 4

Data Collection and

Evaluation

STEP 5 Baseline and

Projected Carbon

Emission

STEP 6 Reporting

Methodology & Approaches

•Urban Environment •Urban Transportation •Urban Infrastructure •Building

(Source: Low Carbon Cities Framework and Assessment System)

Sustainable development l Low Carbon Cities Framework KeTTHA & MGTC, low carbon cities framework

And assessment system

A Roadmap Template – Initiative Towards A Low Carbon City

No TASKS PP SP 1 Initial Discussion the relevant authority √ √

2 Signing of MOU √ √

3 Establishing a Task Force comprising both counterparts: - determine TOR - kick off meeting

√ √

4 LCCF Training (Advance) √ √

5

Determine Criteria, approach and boundary - Determine the suitability of the criteria and sub-

criteria - Determine approach (city based OR one system) - Determine boundary

LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH

ADVICE FROM LCC

6 Site Visit of the intended area √ √

7 Project brief preparation - Mission statement, project roadmap & Etc


ADVICE FROM LCC 8 Technical guidance √ √

9

Data management - Data collection - Establishing baseline - Reporting of findings of the baseline


ADVICE FROM LCC

10 Awarding Provisional Certification (after endorsement by working committee)

√ √

STEPS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LCCF

No TASKS PP SP

11

First Draft Report Detail LCCF assessment report Detail LCCF assessment analysis spread sheet Copy of any relevant materials Applications, assessments and certification procedures / process for LCCF

Profiling Carbon Scenario (Existing, BaU 2020, LCS 2020) Performance Criteria and Measurements (Strategizing) Identify projects and initiatives towards low carbon (by sector - UE, UT, UI, B) Reporting of the low carbon status and improvement (on-going : quarterly/yearly after submission)

LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC

12 Committee evaluation √ √

13 Final Draft Report (submission) LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC

14 Final Report & Presentation LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC

15 Preparation of Roadmap (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC

SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC

16 Implementation (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC


17 Progress Report (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC


18 LCCF Certification & Diamond Rating √ √

STEPS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LCCF

LCCF Evaluation

LCCF Calculator

Landuse

Biodiversity &

Landscape

Embodied

Energy Water

Waste

Transport

Urban Environment

Urban Transport

Urban Infrastructure Building

Electricity, diesel, petrol, natural gas

Water usage, landscape irrigation

Building footprint m2

Surface area, nos of trees, type of trees, covered area with trees

Framework Elements

Waste generated

Corridor, Cordon, Network approach

LCC Framework Elements

Urban Environment

Urban Transport

Urban Infrastructure Building

• Shift of Transport Mode

• Green Transport Infrastructure

• Green Vehicles • Traffic

Management

• Site Selection • Urban Form • Urban Greenery

& Air Quality

• Infrastructure Provision

• Waste • Energy • Water

• Low Carbon Building

• Community Service

LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK & ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (LCCF)

LCCF CARBON TRACKING - INVID Pre-Release

DATA UPDATE: 8-Nov-13 DATA COMPILER: Fendi

Organisational Information

1

2

3

4

5 Type of Organisationa. Consultantb. Developerc. Local Authorityd. Universitye. Others (Please Specify)

6a. Nameb. Designationc. Emaild. Contact No.e. Team Members with responsible criteria

7

Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F

Pn Suraya

Boundary Location

State

Name of City/ Development/ Complex/ Region/ Organisation

Name of Project Partner Focal Taskforce

Malacca

Hang Tuah Jaya

HTJ LCCF

HTJ LCCF

Baseline YearProjected Year (BAU and LCS)

Period20122013

Person-in-charge (Project Partner) :

Project [email protected]

Type B

Type A

Type C

Type D

Type E

The Calculator Interface

LCCF Calculator MS Excel version

RESULTS

Calculator Criteria Element 2012 Baseline 2013 Project (P) Reduction (B-P)

tCO2/yr tCO2/yr tCO2/yr %2012 2013

LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE - C Storage in Soil 22.84 22.84 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress

LANDSCAPE - C Sequestration by Vegetation -37,575,428.95 -37,575,428.95 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress

LANDSCAPE - C Seq. by Trees (not within Open Space) -30,000.00 -30,000.00 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress

LANDUSE LANDUSE - C Storage in Soil (losses) -584,844.13 -584,844.13 0.00 0.00 Indirect value from LANDSCAPE

LANDUSE - C Sequestration by Vegetation (losses) 1,237,056.84 1,237,056.84 0.00 0.00 Indirect value from LANDSCAPE

EMBODIED CARBON IN CONSTRUCTION Building Construction 5,304.91 5,303.15 1.75 0.03 Infrastructure Construction 248.21 248.21 0.00 0.00

OPERATIONAL CARBON Energy 17,668.34 15,203.90 2,464.44 13.95 Water 139.25 123.16 16.10 11.56 Waste 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Assume increase of population

TOTAL EMISSIONS -36,929,832.70 -36,932,314.99 2,482.29 25.54 Best Practise 2 (BP2)

Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013

This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F

Percentage Reduction Achieved

(B-P)/BRemarks

TOTAL CARBON EMISSIONS

LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK & ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (LCCF)

LCCF CARBON TRACKING - INVID Pre-Release

Input Navigation Calculator Engine Framework Criteria Relation

0 Input Database

1 Input Landuse Option 2 Selected Biod Landuse Landscape Calc, V1

2 Input Biodiversity and Landscape

3 Input Embodied Embodied Calc, V1

4 Input Energy Option 1 Selected Energy Calc, V1

5 Input Water Option 1 Selected Water Calc, V1

6 Input Waste Option 1 Selected Waste Calc, V1

7 Input Transport In Progress

8 Summary of ResultsLanduse 0.00 % indirect data from landscapeLandscape 0.00 % In ProgressEmbodied Carbon In Construction 0.03 % In ProgressOperational Carbon 25.51 % In ProgressTOTAL CARBON EMMISION 25.54 % Best Practise 2 (BP2)

BASELINE CO2 Emmission Value -36,929,833 tCO2/yearBAU CO2 Emmission Value -36,932,315 tCO2/yearLCS CO2 Emmission Value To be defined in the Baseline Study Report

Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F

UE 2-3, 3-2, 3-3

NA

NA

NA

B 1-1, 1-2

NA

LCCF Calculator MS Excel version

SUMMARY SHEET

Element Criteria Sub Criteria Summary – Total Carbon Emissions (tCO2/yr)

% reduction

Urb

an

Envi

ronm

ent

UE 1: Urban Footprint

UE 1-1 Prioritize development within defined urban footprint

A B C X

UE 1-2 Encourage sustainable development intensities

Y

Urb

an

Tran

spor

tatio

n UT 1: Shift of Transport Mode UT 1-1 Reduce Single Occupancy

Vehicle (SOV) traveling Z

UT 2: Green Transport Infrastructure

UT 2-1 Increase utilization of public transportation

XX

Urb

an

Infr

astr

uctu

re

UI 1: Infrastructure Provision

UI 1-1 Reduction of land area for infrastructure and utility services

yy

UI 1-2 Implement site wide district cooling system

zz

Build

ing

B 1: Low Carbon Buildings B 1-1 Increase number of buildings

with low carbon footprint XY

TOTAL tCO2e 15 %

EXAMPLE SUMMARY SHEET - Achievement Level Based On Application Of Weightage System

ABSOLUTE CO2 REDUCTION

BP 2

Carbon Reduction

Level Level of Achievement

100% Carbon Neutral

70-99% Best Practice 5 (BP5)





INDIVIDUAL SUB CRITERIA

CALCULATOR

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND SUB CRITERIA

SUMMARY SHEET

Achievement/ Recognition

Assessment and Low Carbon Performance LCC Evaluation

UE

UT

UI

B

1.Sum of reduced emissions

2.Reduction Percentage

UE 1-1 to UE 3-3

UT 1-1 to UT 4-2

UI 1-1 to UI 4-1

B 1-1 to B 2-1

LCCF Data Collection

Introduction

Building Consumption Input System (BCIS) is an online input database system for the purpose of data collection and monitoring the energy and water consumption of buildings.

This system is developed and administered by GreenTech Malaysia on behalf of the Government of Malaysia (KeTTHA).

The participating users can access the system by online and obtain consumption performance analysis of their buildings.

Objectives

Monitoring of the performance of buildings in the 10% Savings of Energy & Water in Government Buildings in Putrajaya. This programme is one of the main programme under the Green Cities Project of Putrajaya & Cyberjaya.

Act as the main data collection tool for Energy & Water segment of the Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF) and also development of Common Carbon Metric (CCM) for buildings in Putrajaya. Other cities CCM shall be developed as well.

Example of Data Reporting

5

USERs Need to PROVIDE all these five (5) information during the duration of the project assessment

DATA COLLECTION | Energy & Water

i) Residential ii) Commercial iii) Others

Monthly Electrical Energy/ Tenaga Elektrik

Bulanan (kwh)

Electrical Maximum Demand/ Kehendak

Maksimum elektrik (kw)

Energy Chilled Water GDC (RTH)

Maximum Demand GDC (RT/month)

Water Consumption, m3

Main Portal

www.greentownship.my

i) Native Garden /indigenous garden ii) Green Roof*2 iii) Crop Farming iv) Tur fs v) Existing Natural Grassland vi) Rehabilitation/ Constructed Wetland/ Riparian

Buffer Strip*2 vii) Existing Wetland/ Riparian Habitat viii) River/ streams/ waterfalls/lakes ix) Native Plantation Forest x) Non-Native Plantation Forest xi) Regenerated Native Habitat <5 years old*2 xii) Regenerated Native Habitat 5 - 10 years old*2 xiii) Indigenous Native Habitat > 10 years old*1 xiv) Indigenous Native Habitat > 20 years old*1

5

Surface Area, (ha)

Area Previously covered by Trees (ha)

Number of Trees

USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected

DATA COLLECTION | Urban Environment

Type of Trees

Landscape

Landuse

5

Surface Area, (ha)

Area Previously covered by Trees (ha)

Number of Trees


DATA COLLECTION | Urban Environment

i) Government ii) Residential iii) Commercial iv) Mixed-Use v) Service Industry vi) Public Amenity vii) Infrastructure & Utility viii) Road ix) Open Space

Embodied Carbon

5

Building Footprint,

(m2)


DATA COLLECTION | Building

i) Offices ii) Residential iii) Hospital iv) Hotel v) Education vi) Commercial vii) Utilities viii) Sports & Leisure Facilities ix) Mixed Use Blocks x) Emergency Services & Security xi) Community Centres & Services xii) Other Special Structures xiii) Other Infrastructures

ENERGY

5

Electricity Consumption,

(kWh)


DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra & Building


Data from

5


DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra & Building


Water Consumption,

(m3)

Data from

WATER

WASTE

5

Weight of Waste Diverted;recycled/ Disposed;landfilled

(tonnes)


DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra

i) Batteries (Post Consumer Non-Automotive) ii) Glass iii) Mixed commercial and industrial waste iv) Mixed municipal waste v) Organic Waste: Garden Waste vi) Paper and board vii) Plasterboard viii) Plastics: Average plastics ix) Silt / Soil x) Wood xi) Mixed Paper (general) xii) Mixed Paper (primarily residential) xiii) Mixed Paper (primarily from offices) xiv) Mixed Metals xv) Mixed Plastics xvi) Etc …

Distance from site to disposal destination (km)

TRANSPORT

Corridor Approach - Emission calculation for a stretch of one road section or a combination of many road sections

Cordon Approach - Emission calculation for a defined road network

Network Approach - A traffic model is developed for the area

5

Selected parameters under Traffic Survey. Eg

amount of vehicles according to types

entering and exiting the section line , junction etc


DATA COLLECTION | Urban Transport

LCCF Case Studies

LCCF Pilot Project Objectives To “test-bed” the LCCF at various localities with different

setting and developmental needs; To obtain a baseline of carbon emissions by using the

LCCF; To apply the carbon calculator at various settings and

localities; To understand different needs and requirements that

would lead to enhancing the LCCF further; To identify strategies and recommendations based on the

Framework; and To reassess the carbon emissions levels to show

reduction or abatement in carbon emissions.

Pilot Partners

NO

PILOT PARTNER

COLLABORATION

APPROACH

STATUS SELECTED CRITERIA TIMELINE

1 MAJLIS BANDARAYA MIRI,SARAWAK

Curtin University, Sarawak

One System

Approach

• Project Brief completed

• Stakeholder Basic training and workshop has been conducted

• Verifying data.

2 Performance Criteria: UE 3-2: Green Space UE 3-3: Number of Trees UI 2-1: Household Solid Waste Management

2014

2 MAJLIS PERBANDARAN HANG TUAH JAYA,MELAKA

One System

Approach


• Baseline data has been collected

• Analysing data

3 Performance Criteria: (UE 2-3) Road And Parking (UE 3-2) Green Open Space (UE 3-3) Number Of Trees (B 1-1) Operational Energy Emissions (B 1-2) Operational Water Emissions

2014

3 UNIVERSITI MALAYA

City Based

Approach


• LCCF Basic & Advanced Training has been conducted

• Data collection in progress (80%)

13 Performance Criteria 35 sub-criteria

2014

4 UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

City Based

Approach


• Finished LCCF Basic Training for UTM’s Stakeholder

• Data collection in progress

10 Performance Criteria UE 1: Site Selection UE 2: Urban Form UE 3: Urban Greenery and Environmental Quality UT 1: Shift of Transport Mode UT 2: Green Transport Infrastructure UI 1: Infrastructure Provision

2014

IMPLEMENTATION STATUS

LCCF CASE STUDIES #1

Federal Government Resort Kenyir Lake, Terengganu

• To study the current inventory of activities of the Kenyir RPP resort and the potential impact where LCCF assessment is applied;

• To determine the carbon emission baseline of the development.

• RPP Tasik Kenyir is an island resort located on Pulau Sah Besar sitting amongst 340 islands within Lake Kenyir. It is a 7- hectare development of more than 20 years old owned by the Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. The island is the tip of a highland not submerged during the construction of the dam.

• The LCCF pilot project on RPP Tasik Kenyir was aimed at testing the applicability of LCCF to a resort development.

• The carbon assessment evaluation based on a City Based Approach.

• Baseline Study Document completed PRO

JEC

T B

RIE

F

11 Applicable Criterias

Short Term Action Plan

Hill Slope Development: Undertake slope maintenance measure

Household Waste Management: Separate waste generated either to be recycled or

composted

Energy Optimization: Street lights fitted with light sensor switches and use energy efficient

bulbs. AC use hydrocarbon gas with zero ODP, & very low GWP

Efficient Water Management: Implement rain water harvesting (gravity based flow) and use of

low flow tap & shower Buildings: metering water and energy

consumption and use of energy efficient lighting & appliances

Long Term Action Plan

Green Space: Tree planting with high rates of carbon absorption

Low Carbon Public Transport: Converting petrol engines to bio-diesel

engines

Low Carbon Private Transport: Replacing the petrol motorcycles with

electric bikes

Renewable Energy: Solar farm to cater all electrical energy requirement

Total Carbon Emissions (provisional) Baseline: 95.39 tCO2/year

Projected: 62.35 tCO2/year

Reduction (Baseline – Projected): 95.39 – 62.35

= 33.04 tCO2/year

Percentage of Reduction : 34.64%

Total Carbon Emissions (provisional)

The current baseline for existing site is 95.39tCO2/year with a potential carbon reduction of 62.35tCO2/year if trees are replanted as proposed i.e a reduction of 34.64%. This equates to LCCF 3 diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation). If solar power is use this will further cut down emissions from fossil fuel to generate a higher LCCF rating.


Cyberjaya, Selangor DE

Total Land Area : 28.16km² (6,960.65 ac) Green Area : 634.34 ac (9.11%) Population 2010 : 47,961 Population Density : 1,703/km² (6.8people/ac)

The objectives of the Baseline Study research for Cyberjaya are:

i. To identify the sub-criteria (based on LCCF) which are applicable for Cyberjaya;

ii. To identify the carbon emission baseline of Cyberjaya for 2011;

iii. To forecast the carbon emission level for 2020 based on Business-as-Usual (BaU) model and Low Carbon Strategies (LCS); and

iv. To recommend low carbon strategies that may help in reducing carbon emission level of Cyberjaya.


Cyberjaya, Selangor DE

Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UE

1 Hill slope development – replanting trees with high carbon sequestration vegetation

2 Road and parking should not exceed 20% of total area of development in Cyberjaya. In this case the roads and parking area are less than 20% as allocated by the Cyberjaya Master Plan

3 Green open space is minimum at 10% of the total development or greater

4 Water bodies are conserved for carbon sequestration

5 Indigenous trees of high carbon sequestration including bamboos are planted

6 Expansion of greeneries through green roofs and grid paving etc.

Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UT

1 Awareness campaigns of the carbon impact of transport as a result of usage of SOV

2 Incentives for the reductions of SOV

3 Penalties due to the usage of SOV

RECOMMENDATIONS for Cyberjaya

Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UI

1 Promote awareness campaigns to achieve zero waste to landfills

2 Generate energy out of organic (green) waste

3 Ensure all buildings use DCS cooling

Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for Building

1

Design energy efficiency measures conforming to benchmarks and common carbon metrics to provide trajectories to 40% carbon reduction in 2020 and beyond

2 Build retrofits for existing buildings to meet energy efficiency benchmarks and climate goal trajectories

3 Design buildings conforming to the Common Carbon Metrics (CCM) for carbon reduction in 2020 and beyond

4 Use of renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions

5 Conserve water and therefore resulting in energy savings in water processing and distribution.



Baseline (2011) : 1,401,350 tCO2/year

Projected (*LCS 2020) : 1,109,205 tCO2/year

Reduction (Baseline – Projected): 1,401,350 – 1,109,205

= 292,145 tCO2/year

Percentage of Reduction : 21%

Projected (*BaU 2020) : 3,200,909 tCO2/year (increase of 128% CO2 emmission)

*LCS : Low Carbon Strategies , *BAU : Business As Usual


Overall Summary by Elements

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

UE UT UI B TOTAL

Baseline 2011

BaU 2020

LCS 2020

LCCF Element :: UE – Urban Environment, UT – Urban Transport, UI – Urban Infrastructure, B - Building

UE (tCO2) UT (tCO2) UI (tCO2) B (tCO2) TOTAL (tCO2)

Baseline 2011 883,620 246,682 57,687 213,361 1,401,350

BaU 2020 2,446,662 379,890 143,416 230,942 3,200,909

LCS 2020 630,771 278,585 54,407 145,442 1,109,205


The current baseline for existing site is 1,401,350 tCO2/year with a potential carbon reduction of 1,109,205 tCO2/year if Low Carbon Strategies initiated as proposed i.e a reduction of 21%. This equates to LCCF 2 diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation).


Hang Tuah Jaya, Malacca

• To study the current inventory of activities of the Hang Tuah Jaya (HTJ) municipality and the potential impact where LCCF assessment is applied;

• To determine the carbon emission baseline of the development.

• HTJ municipality has an area of f 35,733 acre and is located in the middle of Malacca state. HTJ municipality has a population of about 114,732 people or consist of 19 percent of total 602,867 population of Malacca.

• The LCCF pilot project on HTJ municipality was aimed at testing the applicability of LCCF to an existing city development.

• The carbon assessment evaluation based on a System Based Approach.

• Project Brief completed. PRO

JEC

T B

RIE

F


Hang Tuah Jaya, LCCF Designated Area

KAWASAN KAJIAN 1. Taman Botanikal

2. Taman Tema Air Wonderland

Melaka

3. Taman Tasik Utama

4. MITC

5. Dusun Dato Murad

6. Kota Cemerlang

7. Kompleks KDN

8. Taman Seribu Bunga

9. Seri Negeri

10. Seri Bendahara

11. Dataran Sejarah

12. Ayer Keroh Country Club

(AKCC)

13. Tasik Ayer Keroh

14. Zoo Melaka

15. Taman Mini Malaysia

2

1

3

6

5

4

9 8

7

10

13

12

11

15

14

Keluasan: 1,956.57 ekar

Short Term Strategies

Menjalankan program penjimatan penggunaan tenaga dan air sebanyak 10% penjimatan (tanpa

kos)

Melaraskan suhu persekitaran dari penghawa dingin di setiap bangunan yang terlibat ke 24°C

Melaksanakan Sistem Pengumpulan Air Hujan (SPAH) untuk kegunaan lanskap, tandas dan

pembersihan am

Penggunaan cahaya siang semulajadi di dalam bangunan (kurang menggunakan lampu

elektrik)

Long Term Strategies

Penanaman pokok yang mempunyai kadar penyerapan karbon yang tinggi . Ch. Buluh

tempatan, dan Eucalyptus

Penggunaan tenaga yang boleh diperbaharui iaitu Solar Fotovoltaik

Penggunaan peralatan cekap tenaga di setiap bangunan (Lampu LED/ T5, komputer riba,

inverter aircond)

Mempunyai ruang terbuka hijau minimum 10% atau lebih daripada jumlah pembangunan


This is work in progress and carbon reduction target is set at 10% for the year 2014 which equates to LCCF 2 Diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation).

Summaries

LCCF : Improvement Actions Improve Data Collection - is always the problem in starting up

LCCF for any application since it is a PERFORMANCE BASED system and based on actual measurement data. Thus, a continuous data collection is needed to ensure that in

future, the monitoring and reporting that are related to carbon emission is comprehensive and the findings are robust.

Setting up Low Carbon City Committee in each applied zones/areas to ensure the low carbon initiatives are being followed through and implemented consistently. The committee shall also be responsible to: Monitor data collection related to low carbon initiatives; Promote stakeholders in applying and implementing the low

carbon strategies; and Lead the committee in developing their own Low Carbon City

Roadmap/ Action Plan.

LCCF : Issues & Challenges Issues

Low acceptance or understanding by other PBTs, University campus and developers on the Low Carbon Cities Concept

Short of expertise in the low carbon cities concept

Data Collection & Sharing of Data Lack of fiscal incentives during

earlier time of implementation Lack of man-power and financial

resources Lack of buy-in from senior

management of municipalities

Challenges

To increase acceptance and awareness of the stakeholders

To ensure successful implementation of the current pilot projects and strategic partners which act as an example for future projects.

To position MGTC as the Low Carbon City One Stop Centre for the country

To create mechanism to bring LCCF into the mainstream of current development mechanism

Notes on LCCF

LCCF is not to compare with other cities but to compare own self (Baseline/current) with Business As Usual (BAU) and Low Carbon Strategies (LCS) of their own respective city

To guide, gauge and monitor how much reduction in carbon emission can be achieved by using Low Carbon Strategies (LCS) defined by each cities.

MALAYSIAN GREEN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (462237-T)

No. 2, Jalan 9/10, Persiaran Usahawan, Seksyen 9, 43650 Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor.

Tel: 603 – 8921 0800 Fax: 603 – 8921 0801 Website: www.greentechmalaysia.my

MINISTRY OF ENERGY, GREEN TECHNOLOGY AND WATER

Block E4/5, Goverment Complex Parcel E, Presint 1 Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62668

Putrajaya Tel: 603 – 8883 6000 Fax: 603 – 8889 3930

Website: www.kettha.gov.my

THANK YOU

Penggunaan Aplikasi “Carbon Calculator Low Carbon Cities ... · 04/04/2016 · Penggunaan...

Documents

Transcript of Penggunaan Aplikasi “Carbon Calculator Low Carbon Cities ... · 04/04/2016 · Penggunaan...