Peer Review Objectives

6
Peer Review Objectives Wayne Reiersen Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006

description

Peer Review Objectives. Wayne Reiersen Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006. NCSX has just started FPA on Station 1. Preparations for other stations are planned or in process. Does our technical approach to field period assembly appear feasible? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Peer Review Objectives

Page 1: Peer Review Objectives

Peer Review Objectives

Wayne ReiersenField Period Assembly Peer Review

October 11-12, 2006

Page 2: Peer Review Objectives

NCSX has just started FPA on Station 1

VVSAs (3 ) fabr ic ate dat M ajo r To o l

M o dular c o i ls (1 8 )fabr ic ate d at P P P L

TF c o ils (1 8 )fabr ic ate d at E TI

Ins tal l c o o lant tube s ,he ate r s t r ips , and

f lux lo o ps

STATIO N 1

As s e m ble into 3 -c o ilm o dule s

As s e m ble two 3 -c o ilm o dule s o ve r VVSA

As s e m ble into 3 -c o ilTF m o dule s

Ins tal l two TF 3 -c o i l m o dule sand add po r t e xte ns io ns toc o m ple te the f ie ld pe r io d

As s e m ble thre e f ie ldpe r io ds to c o m ple te

s te l larato r c o re

STATIO N 2 STATIO N 3

STATIO N 4 STATIO N 5

NC

SX M

fg F

acili

tyN

CSX

Tes

t Cel

l

Page 3: Peer Review Objectives

Preparations for other stationsare planned or in process

Station 1 2 3 4 5

BrooksDimensional Control Plan

√ Oct06 Jan07 Feb07 Apr07

ColeAssembly Spec and Drawings

Dec06

Mar07

Feb07

May07

Jun07

Apr07

May07

Jul07

Apr07

Brown Tooling Design √ Oct06 Jan07 Feb07 Apr07

Assembly Sequence Plan

√ Oct06 Jan07 Feb07 Apr07

DudekTooling Fabrication and Installation

√ Mar07 May07 Jun07 Aug07

ViolaAssembly Procedure

ACC Review √

Start Assembly √ Jun07 Aug07 Nov07 Sept07

Page 4: Peer Review Objectives

Peer review objective - solicit expert advice on critical issues

• Does our technical approach to field period assembly appear feasible?

• Are metrology provisions and tooling design suitable?• Are dimensional control requirements realizable?• Are time and resource allocations reasonable?• What are the most significant risks? • What might we do differently?

Page 5: Peer Review Objectives

Committee Members

• Torsten Braeuer, Lutz Wegener, Fred Hurd (W7-X)• David Anderson, Simon Anderson (HSX-UW)• Steve Knowlton (CTH-Auburn U)• Ken Chipley, Tom McManamy (SNS-ORNL)• Erik Perry (chair), Jim Chrzanowski, Geoff Gettelfinger

(PPPL)

Page 6: Peer Review Objectives

Agenda

October 11 9:00     Reiersen           Review objectives 9:10     Brooks              Dimensional control requirements for the mod coils and

TF coils 9:30     Cole                  Design overview and assembly features10:30    Brown               FPA assembly sequence, tooling, measurements, and

adjustmentsNoon                            ADJOURN

October 12 9:00    Viola                 Cost and schedule, staffing, metrology utilization10:00   Perry                Coordinate collection of comments from

reviewersNoon                            ADJOURN