PECAN Phase 2: Pilot for Ensuring Continuity of Access via Nesli2
-
Upload
edina-university-of-edinburgh -
Category
Education
-
view
792 -
download
2
Transcript of PECAN Phase 2: Pilot for Ensuring Continuity of Access via Nesli2
PECAN Phase 2Pilot for Ensuring Continuity of Access via Nesli2
Adam Rusbridge
EDINA, University of Edinburgh
Workshops with Libraries
12th March 2012 :: JISC Collections, London
19th March 2012 :: EDINA, Edinburgh
EDINA Proposal
• Develop a prototype entitlement registry • Match up title information with institutional subscriptions and post-cancellation
entitlement
• Key components were to:
• Design and implement a demonstrator Entitlement Registry • Supporting initial ingest and display of data
• Assess methods to automate data ingest
• Assess methods to maintain accuracy of records over time
• Understand information requirements • For recording, maintaining, providing access
• UK HE community
• NESLi2 publishers
Initial Data Model
• Package (collection) as central component
• Flexible institutional identifiers
• Record institutional relationships (record license transfer info)
• Capture ‘verification statement’
• Capture publisher transfers over time
Data Supply
• Taylor and Francis:
• SAGE:
Data Sources: Handling dynamic information
• Two related content requirements
• 1. Record of Entitlement • Messy as an institution can change titles part-way through a deal
(keeping the same cost value)
• Messy as publishers transfer titles, and entitlements, to other publishers
• 2. Current information about a deal• Messy as titles move in and out of a deal
• How do we capture this dynamic information?
Data Sources: Handling dynamic information
1. Duplicate coverage: is it useful to identify reasons for this?• Different subscriptions, purchasing departments
• How do we usefully distinguish purchases and purchasing authorities
1. How important is the ‘package’?• Neither publisher provided us with this, although we did request it
• How to define and maintain information on package/collection?• Journal A-Z lists are a good source of information
• But don’t seem to be updated regularly?
• Recording publisher transfers• Source information through the TRANSFER initiative
3. Purchasing authority: understanding account numbers
Data Formats
• Spreadsheets are satisfactory for development purposes, but do not scale
• A-Z title lists are a suitable source for title information• Effort to ingest every time: standard formats or a central source like the ISSN
Register would assist
• Service- level needs a standard format• ONIX for Serials: SOH (Serials Online Holdings)• ONIX for Serials: SPS (Serials Products and Subscriptions)• KBART..?
• However, need better publisher support before expecting them to undertake developments.
Demo
• http://pecandev.edina.ac.uk:8080• Jane Librarian / passw0rd• Bill Books / passw0rd
Demo
Conclusions so far…
• Publishers manually intervened to generate information• We need to specify and agree data field & formats• Negotiate supply of this, with sensible timings
• Standards will be useful• ONIX family show promise• Longer-term prospect: negotiation needed for publisher support
• To get publisher buy-in, we need new workflows around supply of information• As part of contract, publisher delivers record of entitlement to registry
• Make this a requirement of future NESLi2 license…?
• Need service level registry first
• Goal is to minimise need for manual intervention
How can the prototype be extended?
• Prototype has limited functionality• Use entitlement registry to assist with the verification process• Draw in data from other services, e.g. Keepers Registry
• Following slides contain a selection of wire-framed ideas to highlight possibilities.
Wireframes: Verification & External Data
Wireframes: Verification Process
Wireframes: Verification Summary & Reporting