PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

23
Formation Flying - T.Suga no PDR slides for Tomo Sugano Tasks done so far: In-flight Delta V estimation of the mission Atmospheric Drag Analysis Orbital Decay Life Communication/CPU selection

description

PDR slides for Tomo Sugano. Tasks done so far: In-flight Delta V estimation of the mission Atmospheric Drag Analysis Orbital Decay Life Communication/CPU selection. Presence of Atmospheric Drag in LEO orbit. Atmospheric density is largest at perigee Largest drag is experienced at perigee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Page 1: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Tasks done so far:

In-flight Delta V estimation of the mission

Atmospheric Drag Analysis

Orbital Decay Life

Communication/CPU selection

Page 2: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Presence of Atmospheric Drag in LEO orbit

• Atmospheric density is largest at perigee• Largest drag is experienced at perigee• Atmospheric drag shall be considered if orbit perigee height is <1000 km• Atmospheric drag acceleration (D):

1/(ACD/m) is the ballistic coefficient, a measure of resistance to fluid

A (projected area normal to flight path) m (mass of spacecraft) f (latitude correction coefficient)

Page 3: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Effect of Atmospheric Drag to Orbit Profile

• Atmospheric drag tends to circularise the probe’s orbit• Drag effect greatest at perigee• Apogee height consequently reduced• Overall altitude is lost unless orbit correction is done• Determinant of satellite decay time

Page 4: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Drag Coefficient of STS and other LEO probes

• STS Orbiter (aka the Space Shuttle)• STS has a CD of 2.0 at typical mission altitudes in LEO

• Above 200 km of orbit altitude, use 2.2 < CD < 3.0

• Cylindrical probes have larger CD than those of spherical probes

• Exact CD is hard to predict as LEO environment is not fully understood• Currently best determined by actual flight test

Page 5: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Consideration of Drag in Formation Flying

• FF mission is required to last at least 24 hours• STS orbiter (primary) typically performs a trim burn once a day• Trim burns correct orbit altitude and ascending node• Drag differentials present between primary and satellite(s)• Possible consideration of LEO drag in our mission

Page 6: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Orbital Decay

• Perturbation in LEO is mainly due to atmospheric drag• Orbital decay of space probes (e.g. Space Shuttle, ISS, satellites)• Altitude correction “trim burns” necessary to keep probes in orbit• Orbit will decay in the absence of trim burns

Page 7: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Orbit Lifetime Estimation

• Estimation of the orbit lifetime of our satellite after mission• Consider atmospheric drag effect only• Mission orbit is assumed virtually circular for simplicity

Page 8: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Orbit Lifetime Equation

• Circular Orbit Lifetime Equation (Approximation)

a0 = initial altitude

S = projected area of the space probe m = space probe mass

Page 9: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Exponential Atmospheric Model

• Scale height, H, obtained from tabulated data

Page 10: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Assumptions set forth for our lifetime computation

• Assumptions: (Made for worst case or shortest decay)m = 50 kg (maximum); S = 0.385m2 (spherical correction of max volume)CD = 3.0 (upper bound value in LEO probes)

a0 = 6400 + 300 km (typical altitude for STS or ISS)

Δ = 150 – 300 = - 150 km (typical re-entry altitude, note the minus sign)f = 1 (ignore latitude effect; not significant (<10%))ρ0 = 2.418x10-11 kg/m3 (Table, 300 km base altitude)

• Unavoidable uncertainty Scale height, H- Not constant between orbit and re-entry altitude- Take H = 30 km, so β = 1 / (30 km)

Page 11: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Computation Result

• Based on the assumptions we made- T = tau_0 * 189.565- T = (approx. 1.5 hr of initial orbit period)*(190) = 12 days

• LEO Nanosat at 300 km of altitude will take 12 days to decay.

Page 12: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Conclusion

• Our Nanosat does not decease for 12 days• Retroburn delta-V input to decelerate the Nanosat for faster decay will be

costly without a compelling space debris concern(?)• Unless allowed to dispose of the Nanosat in space, retrieval is rather

recommended(?)• Retrieval may be attained fairly easily by using robot arm of STS perhaps

equipped with capture net(?)

Page 13: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Drag Differential Compensation

• Different ballistic coefficients between the orbiter and the Nonosat• Consequent difference in drag forces exerted during mission• Ballistic Coeff. of STS >> Ballistic Coeff. of Nanosat• Nanosat must expend Delta-V to keep up with STS orbiter

Page 14: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Computations

• Atmospheric drag acceleration (Da):

• Drag (acceleration) difference between the two spacecraft:

STS: S = 64.1 m2, CD = 2.0, m = 104,000 kg (orbiter average) sat: S = 0.385 m2 (nominal), CD = 3.0 (worst case), m = 50 kg

Page 15: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Computations (cont’d)

• Orbiter speed (assuming circular orbit)

• Definition of Delta-V (or specific impulse)

• Mass expenditure of propellant (i.e. GN2 cold gas)

Page 16: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Results

• Using Isp = 65 sec; assume 50 kg for satellite weight

• Conclusions- At the typical 300 km LEO, Delta-V for 1 day mission is 1.36 m/s- Satellite will need at least 107 grams of GN2 to compensate drag- Besides this Delta-V requirement, we have orbit transfer Delta-V (currently estimated at 1.17 m/s) and ADCS Delta-V.

Altitude [km] Density [kg/m3] Dsat-Dsts [m/s2] Thrust Req [N] m_dot [kg/s] mass in 24hr [kg] Delta V for 24hr [m/s]300 2.4180E-11 1.5780E-05 7.8901E-04 1.2386E-06 0.1070 1.363350 9.1580E-12 5.9322E-06 2.9661E-04 4.6564E-07 0.0402 0.513400 3.7250E-12 2.3951E-06 1.1976E-04 1.8800E-07 0.0162 0.207

Page 17: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

FCS and COMM

• FCS – Flight Control System• COMM – Communications (camera is assumed to be part of COMM)• Satellite needs to handle both FCS and COMM systems• Use of COTS (Consumer Off-the-Shelf) computer(s) aimed• COMM utilizes a low-cost COTS transceiver radio

Page 18: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

CPU selection for the Nanosat

• Arcom VIPER 400 MHz CPU recommended• VIPER is suitable because of its

- Light weight, 96 grams- Operable temperature range, -40 C to + 85 C- Windows Embedded feature, easy to program- Computation speed, 400 MHz- Memory capacity, up to 64MB of SDRAM- Embedded audio I/O, necessary for COMM with voice radio

• Redundancy can be implemented.

Page 19: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Arcom VIPER 400 MHz embedded controller

Page 20: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Radio selection for the Nanosat

• Kenwood Free Talk XL 2W transceiver recommended• Kenwood Free Talk XL is suitable because of its

- COTS nature, low cost- 2W of transmission power, more than enough for non-obstructed space communication, but higher wattage than FRS 500 mW radio- Ability to use both GMRS and FRS frequencies- FRS frequencies recommended because by international treaty FRS (Family walkie talkie) is restricted to 500 mW- 500 mW is too weak to penetrate into space- MilSpec cetified

Page 21: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Kenwood Free Talk XL 2W FRS/GMRS Transceiver

• 15 UHF channels (7 FRS and 8 GMRS)• 2W output for both categories• DC 7.2 V (600mAh)• Circuit board weighs only 60 grams • Speaker/Microphone/Encapsulation Removed

Page 22: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Scheme of FCS/COMM Integration

Page 23: PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Detailed Scheme of integration