Juvenile Justice in California - 2015 Report - CJSC ... Justice in California, 2015 ... Juvenile...

130

Transcript of Juvenile Justice in California - 2015 Report - CJSC ... Justice in California, 2015 ... Juvenile...

  • The Role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center

    is to:

    Collect, analyze, and report statistical data that provide valid measures of crime and the criminal justice process.

    Examine these data on an ongoing basis to better describe crime and the criminal justice system.

    Promote the responsible presentation and use of crime statistics.

    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General

  • Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i

    Juvenile Justice System at-a-Glance ........................................................................................... iv

    Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................... vii Arrests ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Referrals ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Petitions ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 Adult Court Dispositions ........................................................................................................................ 47

    Data Tables ....................................................................................................................................... 55

    Appendices ......................................................................................................................................101 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 103 2 Data Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 104 3 California Code Sections .................................................................................................................... 106 4 Felony-Level Offense Codes ............................................................................................................. 108 5 Misdemeanor-Level Offense Codes ............................................................................................... 110 6 Juvenile Justice Glossary.................................................................................................................... 112

  • Executive Summary Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 provides insight into the juvenile justice process by reporting the number of arrests, referrals to probation departments, petitions filed, and dispositions for juveniles tried in juvenile and adult courts. Law enforcement agencies provide information on the number of arrests. Probation departments and Superior Courts provide information on the types of offenses and administrative actions taken by juvenile and adult courts.

    The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is required to collect and report statistics on juvenile justice in California. Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 reflects data extracted from the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register, Offender-Based Transaction Statistics file, and the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System. (Appendix 1 describes the evolution of this system.) Referral and petition statistics were submitted to the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System by 55 of Californias 58 counties, representing over 99 percent of the states juvenile population. Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra counties are not included in the referral and petition sections of this report.

    Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 presents juvenile justice statistics in four sections: Arrests, Referrals, Petitions, and Adult Court Dispositions. The arrest data were reported by law enforcement agencies and law enforcement referral data were reported by probation departments. Comparisons between arrest data and referral data should not be made because of differences in the way data were reported between the two sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.

    zz The Arrests section presents information on the number of juveniles arrested, the types of arrest charges, and the demographic characteristics of the juveniles.

    zz The Referrals section presents information on the number of juveniles referred to county probation departments, who referred the juveniles to the probation departments, the type of referral, the demographic characteristics of the juveniles referred, and the probation department dispositions.

    zz The Petitions section presents information on cases where a petition was filed, including the number of petitions filed, the types of petitions filed, the demographic characteristics of the juveniles, and the dispositions for those petitions handled in juvenile court.

    zz The Adult Court Dispositions section presents information on juveniles whose cases were processed in adult court, including the number of juveniles tried in adult court, the characteristics of the juveniles, and the adult court dispositions.

    i

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Below is a summary of highlights from each of the sections.

    Arrests

    The Arrests section (pages 111) provides data on reported juvenile arrests made by law enforcement agencies in 2015.

    zz More than half of the juveniles (58.2 percent) were arrested for a misdemeanor offense. Nearly a third (29.7 percent) were arrested for a felony offense, and the remainder (12.1 percent) were arrested for a status offense. (Table 1)

    zz Eight out of ten juveniles arrested (80.7 percent) were referred to county juvenile probation departments. (Table 1)

    Referrals

    The Referrals section (pages 1327) provides data on juveniles who were brought to the attention of the county probation department in 2015.

    zz Nearly nine out of ten juveniles referred to county probation departments (88.1 percent) were referred by law enforcement agencies. (Table 8)

    zz Over one-fourth (27.7 percent) of juveniles referred to county probation departments were detained. (Table 13)

    zz More than one-third (36.8 percent) of the juvenile cases referred to county probation departments were closed at intake, indicating that no further action was taken. (Table 13)

    zz In half (51.0 percent) of the referrals to the probation departments, a petition was filed in juvenile court. (Table 13)

    Petitions

    The Petitions section (pages 2945) provides data on juvenile cases that proceeded to the juvenile court [for formal processing] in 2015.

    zz Of the juveniles handled formally by the juvenile court, nearly two-thirds (64.5 percent) were made wards of the court. (Table 21)

    zz One-sixth (16.7 percent) of the petitions for formal juvenile court adjudication were dismissed. (Table 21)

    ii

  • iii

    Executive Summary

    Adult Court Dispositions

    The Adult Court Dispositions section (pages 4753) provides data on juveniles processed through the adult court system.

    zz Of the juveniles tried in adult court, 88.0 percent were convicted. (Table 30)

  • iv

    At-a-Glance Juvenile Justice System, 2015

    Probation Department Dispositions

    86,539 100.0%

    Public Agency/

    Individual 5,088 5.9%

    Other Sources

    1,582 1.8%

    Transfers 1,490 1.7%

    Schools, Parents,

    Private Agency/ Individual

    2,095 2.4%

    Arrests 71,923 100.0%

    Juvenile Court

    Dispositions 44,107 100.0%

    Law Enforcement

    Referral Cases 76,284 88.1%

    Closed at Intake 31,830 36.8%

    Informal Probation

    2,165 2.5%

    Diversion 5,600 6.5%

    Referred to Probation

    58,020 80.7%

    Counseled and Released

    12,973 18.0%

    Turned Over 930

    1.3%

    Juvenile Arrests Juvenile Probation

    Transferred1 2,345 2.7%

    Petitions Filed

    44,107 51.0%

    Direct File in Adult Court

    492 0.6%

    Source: Tables 1, 8, 13, 21, and 30. Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

    1Transferred includes traffic court and deported. 2In 2015, probation departments reported information on 566 transfers to the adult system. The adult court disposition information discussed here is for the 416 dispositions received in 2015.

  • Wardship 28,447 64.5%

    Dismissed 7,359 16.7%

    Diversion, Deferred Entry of Judgment,

    or Transferred1 2,883 6.5%

    Informal Probation

    2,940 6.7%

    Non-Ward Probation

    2,404 5.5%

    Remanded to Adult Court

    74 0.2%

    Own or Relatives

    Home 15,175 53.3%

    Secure County Facility 8,580 30.2%

    Non-Secure County Facility

    587 2.1%

    Other Public or Private Agency 3,385 11.9%

    Division of Juvenile Justice

    216 0.8%

    Other 504

    1.8%

    v

    zz Arrest data were reported by law enforcement agencies and referral data were reported by probation departments. Data comparisons should not be made because of differences in the way data are reported between sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.

    zz Typically, referrals are made to the probation department in the juveniles county of residence. The majority of referrals in this report came from police and sheriffs departments (88.1 percent). (Table 8)

    zz Probation departments decide how to process referred cases. A case may be closed or transferred; a juvenile may be placed on informal probation or in a diversion program; or a petition may be sought for a court hearing.

    zz Most formal juvenile court hearings resulted in the juvenile being made a ward of the court (64.5 percent). Most wards were allowed to go home under the supervision of the probation department (53.3 percent). (Table 21)

    zz Juveniles can be transferred to the adult criminal justice system for prosecution if the district attorney files charges directly in adult court or remands to adult court after the juvenile fails a fitness hearing. Approximately nine out of ten dispositions received in adult court in 2015 resulted in a conviction (88.0 percent). (Table 30)

    Juveniles to Adult Court

    Adult Dispositions Received in

    2015 416 2

    100.0%

    Convicted 366

    88.0%

    Acquitted 2

    0.5%

    Dismissed 47

    11.3%

    Jail 14

    3.8% Certified to

    Juvenile Court 1

    0.2%

    Other 9

    2.5%

    Adult Prison/ DJJ 218

    59.6%

    Probation 11

    3.0%

    Probation with Jail

    114 31.1%

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    vi

  • Arrests A juvenile may be arrested for either violating a criminal statute or committing a status offense. Status offenses are acts that are offenses only when committed by a juvenile, such as curfew violations, truancy, running away, and incorrigibility.

    This section contains information on the 71,923 juvenile arrests reported by law enforcement agencies in 2015. This section also includes information on the characteristics of juvenile arrests and arrestees, and the final law enforcement dispositions of those arrests. Although some arrests involve more than one offense, only the most serious are shown in this report. Arrest data for all 58 participating counties were extracted from the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register.

    The law enforcement disposition of a juvenile arrest is affected by several variables: investigative findings and the facts surrounding the alleged offense; prior arrest record; seriousness of the offense; determined need for admonishment; recourse to other authority; and other factors determined by the individual case.

    Law enforcement agencies have three methods for the disposition of a juvenile arrest:

    zz Refer to probation departments for further processing. Some are handled at the probation level, and others are sent to juvenile and criminal courts for final disposition.

    zz Handle within the department, where juveniles are counseled and released.

    zz Turn over to another agency.

    Notes: References to race/ethnicity will be made throughout this report. The subjectivity of the classification and labeling process must be considered in the analysis of race/ethnic group data. As commonly used, race refers to large populations that share certain physical characteristics, such as skin color. Because these physical characteristics can vary greatly within groups, as well as between groups, determination of race is frequently, by necessity, subjective. Ethnicity refers to cultural heritage and can cross racial lines. For example, the ethnic designation Hispanic can include persons of any race. Most commonly, self-identification of race/ethnicity is used in the classification and labeling process.

    Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

    1

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    2

    Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Level of Offense

    34.6% 55.0% 10.4%

    17.3% 66.4% 16.3%

    MALE

    FEMALE

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    PERCENT

    STATUS FELONY MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES

    Source: Table 1.

    Level of Offense

    Juvenile Arrests, 2015 By Level of Offense

    FELONY 29.7%

    MISDEMEANOR 58.2%

    STATUS OFFENSES

    12.1%

    Source: Table 1.

    In 2015, of the 71,923 juvenile arrests reported:

    zz Felony arrests accounted for 29.7 percent (21,381).

    zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 58.2 percent (41,848).

    zz Status offense arrests accounted for 12.1 percent (8,694).

    In 2015, of the 51,693 arrests of males:

    zz Felony arrests accounted for 34.6 percent (17,879).

    zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 55.0 percent (28,420).

    zz Status arrests accounted for 10.4 percent (5,394).

    In 2015, of the 20,230 arrests of females:

    zz Felony arrests accounted for 17.3 percent (3,502).

    zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 66.4 percent (13,428).

    zz Status arrests accounted for 16.3 percent (3,300).

  • Arrests

    31.9%

    27.5%

    30.4%

    58.8%

    61.5%

    57.1%

    9.2%

    11.0%

    12.5%

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    0 20

    FELONY

    Source: Table 1.

    Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee

    By Level of Offense

    40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    STATUS MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles in each age group were arrested for similar proportions of felony, misdemeanor, and status offenses.

    By Level of Offense

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20

    FELONY

    Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee

    23.6% 13.5%62.9%

    29.0% 58.1% 13.0%

    40.4% 50.8% 8.8%

    25.9% 65.1% 9.0%

    40 60

    PERCENT

    MISDEMEANOR

    80 100

    STATUS OFFENSES

    Source: Table 1.

    Level of Offense

    In 2015, of the three defined race/ethnic groups:

    zz A greater percentage of whites were arrested for a misdemeanor (62.9 percent) and status offenses (13.5 percent).

    zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a felony (40.4 percent).

    3

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    DRUG OFFENSES

    7.2%

    Source: Table 3.

    Felony Arrests, 2015 By Category

    ALL OTHER

    OFFENSES 27.2%

    VIOLENT OFFENSES

    34.3%

    PROPERTY OFFENSES

    31.3%

    Felony Arrests

    In 2015, of the 21,381 juvenile felony arrests reported:

    zz 34.3 percent (7,341) were for violent offenses.

    zz 31.3 percent (6,685) were for property offenses.

    zz 7.2 percent (1,533) were for drug offenses.

    zz 27.2 percent (5,822) were for all other felony offenses.

    MALE

    FEMALE

    VIOLENT OFFENSES

    Source: Table 3.

    Felony Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    33.1% 7.5%

    31.5%

    40.6% 30.1% 23.6%5.7%

    27.9%

    PERCENT

    PROPERTY DRUG ALL OTHER OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES

    In 2015, of the 17,879 felony arrests of males:

    zz Violent offenses accounted for 33.1 percent (5,918).

    zz Property offenses accounted for 31.5 percent (5,631).

    In 2015, of the 3,502 felony arrests of females:

    zz Violent offenses accounted for 40.6 percent (1,423).

    zz Property offenses accounted for 30.1 percent (1,054).

    4

  • Arrests

    Felony Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category

    28.3% 36.3% 1.6%

    33.8%

    35.6% 5.0%

    29.1% 30.3%

    34.1% 7.9%

    31.8% 26.2%

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG ALL OTHERVIOLENT PROPERTY OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES

    Source: Table 3.

    Felony Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    28.2%32.2%

    30.2%31.7%

    35.9%41.7%

    25.9%31.5%

    10.3%

    7.7% 30.3%

    19.4%

    31.0%

    2.9%

    11.6%

    29.3%

    DRUG ALL OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES

    Source: Table 3.

    Felony Arrests

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles in each age group were arrested for similar proportions of violent and property offenses.

    zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group were more likely to be arrested for a felony drug offense than juveniles in any other age group (7.9 percent).

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a felony violent offense (41.7 percent) and a felony property offense (35.9 percent) than any other race/ethnic group.

    zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the smallest proportion of felony arrests were for drug offenses.

    5

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Misdemeanor Arrests

    Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 By Category

    ALL OTHER 24.6%

    THEFT 18.5%

    MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13.5%

    ASSAULT AND

    BATTERY 23.3%

    DRUG AND

    ALCOHOL 20.2%

    Source: Table 3.

    In 2015, of the 41,848 juvenile misdemeanor arrests reported:

    zz 23.3 percent (9,753) were for assault and battery.

    zz 18.5 percent (7,733) were for theft offenses.

    zz 20.2 percent (8,436) were for drug and alcohol offenses.

    zz 13.5 percent (5,629) were for malicious mischief offenses.

    zz 24.6 percent (10,297) were for all other misdemeanor offenses.

    MALE

    FEMALE

    0

    Source: Table 3.

    Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category

    22.1% 14.8% 21.8% 14.9% 26.4%

    25.9% 26.3% 16.7% 10.4% 20.7%

    20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG AND ASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOLAND BATTERY

    MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER

    In 2015:

    zz Males were more likely to be arrested for a misdemeanor drug or alcohol offense than females (21.8 vs. 16.7 percent, respectively).

    zz Females were more likely to be arrested for a misdemeanor theft offense than males (26.3 vs. 14.8 percent, respectively).

    6

  • Arrests

    7

    Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category

    40.9%

    28.7%

    21.1%

    16.1%

    17.2%

    19.0%

    7.1%

    16.1%

    21.8%

    18.1%

    16.9%

    12.1%

    17.8%

    21.0%

    26.0%

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG AND ASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOLAND BATTERY

    MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER

    Source: Table 3.

    Misdemeanor Arrests

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of juveniles in the under 12 age group were arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery (40.9 percent) and malicious mischief (18.1 percent) than any other age category.

    Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    11.8% 21.9%

    17.3%22.1%

    22.4%31.4%

    22.6%18.2%

    26.1%

    21.3% 14.1%

    15.1%

    9.8%

    8.1%

    18.8%

    17.3% 23.0%

    25.1%

    23.0%

    30.6%

    PERCENT

    ASSAULT THEFTAND BATTERY

    MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER

    DRUG AND ALCOHOL

    Source: Table 3.

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of whites were arrested for a misdemeanor drug or alcohol offense (26.1 percent) than any other race/ethnic group.

    zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a misdemeanor assault and battery offense (31.4 percent) than any other race/ ethnic group.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    8

    Status Offense Arrests, 2015 By Category

    TRUANCY 13.5%

    RUNAWAY 34.5%

    OTHER STATUS

    OFFENSES 21.1%

    CURFEW 22.1%

    INCORRIGIBLE 8.8%

    Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    Status Offense Arrests

    In 2015, of the 8,694 status offenses reported:

    zz Truancy violations accounted for 13.5 percent (1,174).

    zz Runaways accounted for 34.5 percent (2,998).

    zz Curfew violations accounted for 22.1 percent (1,918).

    zz Incorrigible offenses accounted for 8.8 percent (767).

    zz "Other" status offenses accounted for 21.1 percent (1,837).

    Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category

    MALE

    FEMALE

    PERCENT

    TRUANCY RUNAWAY CURFEW

    INCORRIGIBLE OTHER STATUS OFFENSES

    Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    14.8% 24.1%27.3%

    11.3% 46.3% 13.7%18.7%

    25.7% 8.1%

    9.9%

    In 2015:

    zz Males were more likely to be arrested for curfew violations than females (24.1 vs. 18.7 percent).

    zz Females were more likely to be arrested for being a runaway than males (46.3 vs. 27.3 percent).

  • Arrests

    Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    4.4% 27.5%

    14.4% 16.1%

    13.4% 23.9%

    42.9%

    40.4%

    32.7%

    17.1%

    13.2%

    22.4%

    12.1%

    12.0%

    7.7%

    PERCENT

    CURFEWTRUANCY RUNAWAY

    OTHER STATUS INCORRIGIBLE OFFENSES

    Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    Status Offense Arrests

    In 2015:

    zz For all age groups there were a greater percentage of runaway arrests than any other status offense category.

    zz A greater percentage of truancy arrests were in the 1214 age group than any other group (14.4 percent).

    zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group were more likely to be arrested for a curfew violation than any other age group (23.9 percent).

    Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    16.2%6.9%

    31.4%17.3%

    35.9%10.9%

    31.1%9.6%

    22.6%

    21.4% 22.7%

    24.8%

    17.0%

    18.8%

    38.6%

    41.3% 13.0%

    7.2%

    9.5%

    3.7%

    PERCENT

    TRUANCY CURFEW

    OTHER STATUS

    RUNAWAY

    INCORRIGIBLE OFFENSES

    Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    In 2015:

    zz White juveniles were arrested for runaway offenses more than any other race/ethnic group (41.3 percent).

    9

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Law Enforcement Level Dispositions

    Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 By Type of Disposition

    TURNED OVER COUNSELED 1.3% & RELEASED

    18.0%

    REFERRED TO PROBATION

    80.7%

    Source: Table 1.

    When processing juvenile arrestees, law enforcement agencies may refer juveniles to the probation department, counsel and release them, or turn them over to another agency.

    In 2015, of the 71,923 law enforcement dispositions reported:

    zz 80.7 percent resulted in a referral to probation (58,020).

    zz 18.0 percent resulted in the juvenile being counseled and released (12,973).

    zz 1.3 percent resulted in the juvenile being turned over to another agency (930).

    Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Disposition

    MALE

    FEMALE

    82.3% 16.4% 1.3%

    76.5% 1.2%

    22.3%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    COUNSELEDREFERRED TURNED AND RELEASEDTO PROBATION OVER

    Source: Table 1.

    In 2015:

    zz Males were referred to the probation department more than females (82.3 vs. 76.5 percent).

    zz Females were counseled and released more than males (22.3 vs. 16.4 percent).

    10

  • Arrests

    Law Enforcement Level Dispositions

    Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Disposition

    UNDER 12

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    73.5% 1.3%

    79.0% 1.4%

    81.3% 1.3%

    25.2%

    19.6%

    17.4%

    12-14

    15-17

    PERCENT

    COUNSELEDREFERRED TURNED AND RELEASEDTO PROBATION OVER

    Source: Table 1.

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of age group, the majority of juvenile offenders were referred to probation.

    zzJuveniles under 12 were counseled and released more than any other age group (25.2 percent).

    Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Disposition

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    19.3%79.4%

    17.9%80.8%

    16.0%82.6%

    21.1%77.7%

    1.3%

    1.3%

    1.4%

    1.2%

    REFERRED TO PROBATION

    Source: Table 1.

    PERCENT

    COUNSELED AND RELEASED

    TURNED OVER

    In 2015:

    zz More than 77 percent of juveniles in each race/ethnic group were referred to probation departments by law enforcement.

    11

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    12

  • 13

    Referrals Juvenile referrals occur when a juvenile is brought to the attention of the probation department for a case review. Juveniles can be referred by a variety of sources, with the largest percentage of referrals coming from law enforcement. Referrals may also be generated by schools, parents, public or private agencies, individuals, or by transfers from another county or state.

    Referrals to the probation department consist of two types: new and subsequent. The term new referral applies to a juvenile who is not currently supervised by the probation department and is typically a first-time offender. The term subsequent referral applies to a juvenile who is currently supervised by the probation department. A subsequent referral generally results from a new arrest or probation violation.

    After a juvenile is referred to the probation department, a probation officer determines whether the juvenile should be detained or released. The probation department also conducts an investigation and determines whether the case should be closed or transferred; whether the juvenile should be placed on informal probation; or whether a petition should be filed with the court.

    This section examines referrals by gender, age group, and race/ethnic group. Direct filing into adult court occurs when a juvenile of a certain age commits an offense that is subject to mandatory filing by a prosecutor (Welfare and Institutions Code section 602(b)) or discretionary filing by a prosecutor (Welfare and Institutions Code section 707(d)). This process is separate from the fitness hearing process that is conducted in juvenile court and is highlighted in the Petitions section of this publication. For the purpose of this section, the term juvenile refers to those individuals processed through the juvenile court system.

    The data used in this section originated from 55 participating county probation departments (Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra Counties are not included). This information was submitted to the DOJ from referrals reported in the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System (see Appendix 2).

    Notes: Arrest data are reported by law enforcement agencies, whereas referral data are reported by probation departments. Comparisons between arrest data and referral data should not be made because of differences in the way data are reported between the two sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.

    Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    14

    Referral Source and Type

    Referrals, 2015 By Source

    PUBLIC AGENCY/ TRANSFERS INDIVIDUAL 1.7% OTHER

    5.9% SOURCES SCHOOL/PARENT/ 1.8%

    GUARDIAN 2.4%

    LAW ENFORCEMENT

    88.1%

    Source: Table 8.

    In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals to probation reported:

    zz 88.1 percent (76,284) were from law enforcement.

    zz 2.4 percent (2,095) were from schools, parents, and private agencies and individuals.

    zz 5.9 percent (5,088) were from public agencies or individuals.

    zz 1.7 percent (1,490) were transfers from another county or state.

    zz 1.8 percent (1,582) were from other sources.

    Referrals, 2015 By Type

    NEW 67.1%

    SUBSEQUENT 32.9%

    Source: Table 8.

    In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals reported:

    zz 67.1 percent (58,044) were new referrals.

    zz 32.9 percent (28,495) were subsequent referrals.

  • Referrals

    Referrals, 2015 By Level of Offense

    STATUS OFFENSES

    13.2%

    FELONY 31.3%

    MISDEMEANOR 55.5%

    Source: Table 8.

    Offense Level

    In 2015, of the 115,668 referral offenses reported:

    zz 31.3 percent (36,225) were for felonies.

    zz 55.5 percent (64,182) were for misdemeanors.

    zz 13.2 percent (15,261) were for status offenses.

    Note: As many as five offenses can be reported for each referral. Consequently, the number of referral offenses is higher than the number of referrals.

    15

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Referrals for Felony Offenses

    Type of Referrals, 2015 By Category

    DRUG OFFENSES

    7.5%

    OTHER OFFENSES

    VIOLENT

    30.2% OFFENSES

    29.7%

    PROPERTY OFFENSES

    32.7%

    Source: Table 9.

    In 2015, of the 36,225 referrals for felony offenses:

    zz 29.7 percent (10,742) were for violent offenses.

    zz 32.7 percent (11,843) were for property offenses.

    zz 7.5 percent (2,707) were for drug offenses.

    zz 30.2 percent (10,933) were for other felony offenses.

    Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Gender by Category

    MALE

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    29.0% 7.3% 31.7%

    33.6% 38.3% 19.6%8.5%

    32.0%

    FEMALE

    PERCENT

    DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES

    Source: Table 9.

    In 2015:

    zz Females were referred to the probation department for felony property offenses more than males (38.3 vs. 31.7 percent).

    16

  • Referrals

    Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    23.2%

    31.0%

    30.0%

    26.4%

    49.4%

    27.2%

    33.5%

    35.0%

    0.4%

    4.6% 37.2%

    28.8%

    28.2%

    7.7%

    10.4%

    27.0%

    0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT

    DRUGPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES

    Source: Table 9.

    100

    OTHER OFFENSES

    Referrals for Felony Offenses

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of age group, juveniles were least likely to be referred to probation departments for a felony drug offense.

    Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    25.8% 30.6% 10.0% 33.6%

    26.9% 30.9% 8.6% 33.7%

    38.8% 38.1% 2.7%

    20.4%

    28.4% 33.6% 10.0% 28.0%

    0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT

    100

    DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES

    Source: Table 9.

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of blacks were referred to the probation department for a violent offense (38.8 percent) than any other race/ ethnic group.

    17

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015

    By Category

    ASSAULT AND

    BATTERY 26.3%

    DRUG AND

    ALCOHOL 15.9%

    THEFT 12.2%MALI-

    CIOUS MISCHIEF 13.7%

    ALL OTHER 32.0%

    Source: Table 9.

    In 2015, of the 64,182 misdemeanor referral offenses reported:

    zz 26.3 percent (16,904) were for assault and battery.

    zz 12.2 percent (7,804) were for theft offenses.

    zz 15.9 percent (10,184) were for drug and alcohol offenses.

    zz 13.7 percent (8,780) were for malicious mischief offenses.

    zz 32.0 percent (20,510) were for all other misdemeanor offenses.

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015

    Gender by Category

    MALE

    MALE

    0

    25.0% 10.2% 16.5% 14.9% 33.4%

    29.8% 17.3% 14.2% 10.5% 28.2%

    20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG AND MALICIOUS ALLASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEF OTHERAND BATTERY

    Source: Table 9.

    In 2015:

    zz Males were referred to the probation department for misdemeanor drug and alcohol and malicious mischief offenses more than females.

    zz Females were referred to the probation FEdepartment for misdemeanor assault and battery and theft offenses more than males.

    18

  • Referrals

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    17.4%42.2%

    12.7%32.9%

    12.1%25.4%

    11.8% 19.9%

    4.7%

    12.6% 17.6%

    13.0%

    10.7%

    23.2%

    24.2%

    33.1%

    38.5%

    16.4%

    19.0%

    12.5%

    DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY

    Source: Table 9.

    ALL OTHER

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles under 12 years of age were more than twice as likely as juveniles in the 1824 age group to be referred for assault and battery (42.2 vs. 19.9 percent).

    zz The proportion of juveniles referred to probation departments for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses increased with age. Conversely, the proportion of juveniles referred to probation departments for misdemeanor assault and battery or malicious mischief decreased with age.

    Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    22.8% 12.3% 19.8% 11.7% 33.3%

    25.5% 10.7% 16.6% 14.4% 32.8%

    35.7% 16.4% 6.9%

    26.4%14.5%

    24.0% 14.1% 16.4% 12.3% 33.2%

    0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT

    DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY

    Source: Table 9.

    100

    ALL OTHER

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of whites were referred to probation departments for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses than any other race/ethnic group.

    zz A greater percentage of blacks were referred to probation departments for a misdemeanor assault and battery offense than any other race/ethnic group.

    19

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Status Offense Referrals

    Source: Table 9. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    OTHERSTATUS

    OFFENSES74.5%

    TRUANCY 13.8%

    Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Category

    RUNAWAY 7.6%

    CURFEW 2.5% INCORRIGIBLE

    1.6%

    In 2015, of the 15,261 referrals for status offenses:

    zz 13.8 percent (2,107) were for truancy.

    zz 7.6 percent (1,162) were for running away.

    zz 2.5 percent (383) were for violating curfew.

    zz 1.6 percent (247) were for incorrigibility.

    zz 74.5 percent (11,362) were for other status offenses.

    Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Gender

    MALE 74.1%

    FEMALE 25.9%

    Source: Table 12.

    In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:

    zz 74.1 percent (11,308) were male, and 25.9 percent (3,953) were female.

    20

  • Referrals

    Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Age Group

    UNDER 12

    0.3%

    12-14 13.7%18-24 18.3%

    15-17 67.7%

    Source: Table 12.

    Status Offense Referrals

    In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:

    zz 0.3 percent (44) were juveniles under 12 years of age.

    zz 13.7 percent (2,092) were juveniles in the 1214 age group.

    zz 67.7 percent (10,328) were juveniles in the 1517 age group.

    zz 18.3 percent (2,797) were juveniles in the 1824 age group.

    Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group

    OTHER

    Source: Table 12.

    6.2%

    WHITE 20.3%BLACK

    18.1%

    HISPANIC 55.5%

    In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:

    zz 20.3 percent (3,092) were white.

    zz 55.5 percent (8,467) were Hispanic.

    zz 18.1 percent (2,762) were black.

    zz 6.2 percent (940) were from other race/ethnic groups.

    21

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Detentions

    Detentions, 2015 By Type

    NOT DETAINED

    72.3%

    DETAINED 27.7%

    1.7%

    95.6%

    0 0 SECURE

    FACILITY

    2.7% NON-SECURE HOME 100 FACILITY SUPERVISION

    In 2015, of the 79,098 known preadjudication detentions reported:

    zz 72.3 percent (57,226) of juveniles were not detained.

    zz 95.6 percent (20,904) of those juveniles detained were in a secure facility.

    Source: Table 13.

    MALE

    FEMALE

    0 20

    SECURE FACILITY

    Source: Table 13.

    Detentions, 2015 Gender by Detention Type

    95.8% 2.5% 1.7%

    94.6% 2.0% 3.4%

    40 60 80 PERCENT

    HOMENON-SECURE SUPERVISIONFACILITY

    100

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of gender, the majority of juveniles detained were held in a secure facility.

    zz Females received home supervision more than males (3.4 vs. 2.5 percent).

    22

  • Referrals

    12

    Detentions, 2015 Age Group by Detention Type

    95.0% 5.0%

    94.1% 2.3% 3.7%

    95.6% 1.7% 2.6%

    96.9% 1.2% 1.9%

    UNDER

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    HOMESECURE NON-SECURE SUPERVISION FACILITY FACILITY

    Source: Table 13.

    Detentions

    In 2015:

    zz Over 94 percent of each age group was detained in a secure facility.

    Detentions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Detention Type

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    93.5% 3.0% 3.6%

    95.8% 1.6% 2.6%

    96.8% 1.2% 2.0%

    93.9% 1.7% 4.4%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    SECURE HOMENON-SECURE SUPERVISIONFACILITY FACILITY

    Source: Table 13.

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the majority of detained juveniles were in a secure facility.

    23

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    24

    Probation Department Dispositions

    Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 By Type

    TRANSFERRED DIVERSION 3.3%6.5%

    INFORMAL PROBATION

    2.5%

    PETITIONS FILEDCLOSED

    51.0%AT INTAKE 36.8%

    Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported,

    direct filed, and transferred.

    In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals handled by probation departments:

    zz 51.0 percent (44,107) resulted in a petition being filed.

    zz 36.8 percent (31,830) were closed at intake.

    zz 2.5 percent (2,165) received informal probation.

    zz 6.5 percent (5,600) received diversion.

    zz 3.3 percent (2,837) were transferred.

    Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Disposition Type

    MALE 3.2%

    FEMALE 3.4%

    54.7% 5.5% 2.3%

    39.9% 3.1%

    9.3%

    34.3%

    44.2%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED

    DIVERSION TRANSFERRED

    Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported,

    direct filed, and transferred.

    In 2015:

    zz Males had petitions filed to proceed to juvenile court more than females (54.7 vs. 39.9 percent).

    zz More females than males received diversion (9.3 vs. 5.5 percent) or were closed at intake (44.2 vs. 34.3 percent).

  • Referrals

    12

    Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Disposition Type

    UNDER 14.6%

    39.0%

    51.6%

    67.3%

    4.1%

    3.9%

    2.4%

    0.7%

    69.3%

    45.0%

    35.9%

    27.4%

    11.2%

    10.2%

    0.9%

    12-14 1.9%

    6.2%15-17 3.9%

    2.5% 2.1%

    18-24

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED

    DIVERSION TRANSFERRED

    Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported, direct filed,

    and transferred.

    Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Disposition Type

    WHITE 42.8%

    52.2%

    57.6%

    45.8%

    2.8%

    2.6%

    1.9%

    2.7%

    40.2%

    36.3%

    33.4%

    40.5%

    9.3% 4.8%

    5.9% 3.0%

    HISPANIC

    5.0%BLACK 2.1%

    6.2% 4.8%

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED

    DIVERSION TRANSFERRED

    Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported, direct filed,

    and transferred.

    Probation Department Dispositions

    In 2015:

    zz More than one-half (51.6 percent) of juveniles in the 1517 age group had petitions filed in juvenile court.

    zz The proportion of juveniles having petitions filed increased with age. Conversely, the proportions being closed at intake or receiving informal probation decreased with age.

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of whites received diversion than did any other race/ethnic group (9.3 percent).

    zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, close to half of the referrals resulted in a petition being filed.

    zz Blacks and Hispanics had a greater percentage of petitions filed (57.6 and 52.2 percent, respectively) than whites and "other" (42.8 and 45.8 percent, respectively).

    zz Whites and "other" had a larger percentage of petitions closed at intake (40.2 and 40.5 percent, respectively) than blacks and Hispanics (33.4 and 36.3 percent, respectively).

    25

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Direct File-Adult Court

    Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Disposition Type

    DIRECT FILE INTO

    ALL OTHER DISPOSITIONS

    99.4%

    ADULT COURT 0.6%

    Source: Table 16.

    In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals handled by probation departments:

    zz 0.6 percent (492) resulted in a direct file into adult court.

    zz 99.4 percent (86,047) resulted in a disposition other than direct file into adult court.

    Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Gender

    FEMALE 4.7%

    MALE 95.3%

    Source: Table 16.

    In 2015, of the 492 referrals resulting in a direct file disposition:

    zz 95.3 percent (469) were male.

    zz 4.7 percent (23) were female.

    26

  • Referrals

    Source: Table 16.

    AGE 16 26.8%AGE 17

    50.8%

    Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Age Group

    AGE 14ALL OTHER 3.0%

    AGES AGE 158.7% 10.6%

    Direct File-Adult Court

    In 2015, of the 492 direct files to adult court:

    zz 3.0 percent (15) were 14 years of age.

    zz 10.6 percent (52) were 15 years of age.

    zz 26.8 percent (132) were 16 years of age.

    zz 50.8 percent (250) were 17 years of age.

    zz 8.7 percent (43) were other ages.

    Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group

    OTHER

    HISPANIC 60.8%

    BLACK 25.2%

    3.7% WHITE 10.4%

    Source: Table 16.

    In 2015, of the 492 direct files to adult court:

    zz 10.4 percent (51) were white.

    zz 60.8 percent (299) were Hispanic.

    zz 25.2 percent (124) were black.

    zz 3.7 percent (18) were from other race/ethnic groups.

    27

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    28

  • 29

    Petitions In the juvenile justice system, a case may be handled informally by the probation department or formally by the juvenile court. If the case proceeds for formal processing, the district attorney files a petition with the juvenile court to initiate court action.

    There are two types of petitions filed in juvenile court: new and subsequent. The term new petition applies to a juvenile who is not being supervised by the probation department and is typically a first-time offender. The term subsequent petition applies to a juvenile who is currently being supervised by the probation department and subsequently re-offends.

    This section examines petitions by gender, age group, race/ethnic group, offense, fitness hearings, and disposition.

    The data used in this section originated from 55 participating county probation departments (Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra Counties are not included). This information was routed to the DOJ from petitions reported in the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System (see Appendix 2).

    Note: Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Petition Type

    Petitions Filed, 2015 By Type

    NEW 49.0%

    SUBSEQUENT 51.0%

    Source: Table 18.

    In 2015, of the 44,107 reported petitions filed in juvenile court:

    zz 49.0 percent (21,621) were new petitions.

    zz 51.0 percent (22,486) were subsequent petitions.

    30

  • Petitions

    Petition Level

    Petitions Filed, 2015 By Level of Offense

    FELONY 40.4%

    MISDEMEANOR 42.8%

    STATUS OFFENSES 16.8%

    Source: Table 18.

    In 2015, of the 65,701 petitioned offenses filed:

    zz 40.4 percent (26,541) were for felonies.

    zz 42.8 percent (28,106) were for misdemeanors.

    zz 16.8 percent (11,054) were for status offenses.

    Note: As many as five offenses can be reported for each petition filed. Consequently, the number of petition offenses is higher than the number of petitions.

    31

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Felony Petitions

    VIOLENT OFFENSES

    30.3%

    OTHER OFFENSES

    28.3%

    PROPERTY OFFENSES

    34.3%

    Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 By Category

    DRUG OFFENSES

    7.0%

    Source: Table 19.

    In 2015, of the 26,541 petitioned felony offenses filed in juvenile court:

    zz 30.3 percent (8,048) were for violent offenses.

    zz 34.3 percent (9,104) were for property offenses.

    zz 7.0 percent (1,867) were for drug offenses.

    zz 28.3 percent (7,522) were for other felony offenses.

    Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015

    MALE

    FEMALE

    VIOLENT OFFENSES

    Source: Table 19.

    Gender by Category

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    29.3% 6.8%33.6%

    36.8% 38.6% 16.4% 8.3%

    30.2%

    PERCENT

    PROPERTY DRUG OFFENSESOFFENSES

    OTHER OFFENSES

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of gender, the largest proportion of felony petitions were filed for property offenses.

    32

  • Petitions

    12

    Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category

    UNDER

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    42.3%25.6%

    28.6%33.9%

    35.1%30.2%

    36.1%27.2%

    3.5% 34.0%

    27.5%

    26.4%

    7.1%

    10.2%

    32.1%

    DRUGPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES

    Source: Table 19.

    OTHER OFFENSES

    Felony Petitions

    33

    In 2015:

    zz The proportion of petitions filed for felony drug offenses increased with age.

    zz The proportion of petitions for other offenses decreased with age.

    zz The 12-14 age group had the largest percentage of petitions filed for violent offenses (33.9 percent).

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    32.0%26.6%

    32.5%27.3%

    39.5%39.3%

    34.2%30.0%

    9.2%

    8.2% 32.1%

    18.6%

    25.2%

    2.5%

    10.6%

    32.2%

    DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES

    Source: Table 19.

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of blacks had petitions filed for felony violent offenses and the least petitions filed for felony drug offenses than any other race/ethnic group.

    zz Regardless of race, property offenses comprised the largest percentage of felony petitions.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Misdemeanor Petitions

    Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 By Category

    ASSAULT AND

    BATTERY 33.5%

    ALL OTHER 28.4%

    THEFT 10.8%DRUG AND

    ALCOHOL 13.7%

    MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13.6%

    Source: Table 19.

    In 2015, of the 28,106 petitioned misdemeanor offenses filed in juvenile court:

    zz 33.5 percent (9,413) were for assault and battery offenses.

    zz 10.8 percent (3,043) were for theft offenses.

    zz 13.7 percent (3,848) were for drug and alcohol offenses.

    zz 13.6 percent (3,825) were for malicious mischief offenses.

    zz 28.4 percent (7,977) were for other misdemeanors.

    Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Gender by Category

    MALE

    FEMALE

    0

    31.4% 10.3% 13.8% 14.9% 29.5%

    40.5% 12.5% 13.2% 9.3% 24.5%

    20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    ASSAULT AND BATTERY THEFT

    DRUG AND ALCOHOL

    MALICIOUS MISCHIEF

    ALL OTHER

    Source: Table 19.

    In 2015:

    zz Males had petitions filed for misdemeanor malicious mischief offenses at a greater percentage than females (14.9 vs. 9.3 percent).

    zz Females had petitions filed for misdemeanor assault and battery offenses at a greater percentage than males (40.5 vs. 31.4 percent).

    34

  • Petitions

    Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category

    UNDER

    12

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    36.6% 12.7% 4.2%

    26.8%19.7%

    40.7% 7.8%

    10.5% 15.6% 25.4%

    33.4% 10.8% 13.9% 13.3% 28.6%

    25.3% 11.5% 19.6% 12.6% 30.9%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY

    Source: Table 19.

    ALL OTHER

    Misdemeanor Petitions

    In 2015:

    zz The proportions of petitions filed for malicious mischief offenses decreased with age.

    zz The proportions of petitions filed for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses increased with age.

    Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    30.3%

    32.6%

    42.0%

    29.8%

    9.2%

    11.5%

    11.6% 13.2%

    15.3%

    18.6%

    13.9% 14.4%

    11.4%

    16.3% 13.1%

    5.6%

    26.2%

    25.6%

    29.3%

    29.9%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY

    Source: Table 19.

    OTHER

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of whites had petitions filed for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses (18.6 percent).

    zz A greater percentage of Hispanics had petitions filed for misdemeanor malicious mischief offenses (14.4 percent).

    zz A greater percentage of blacks had petitions filed for misdemeanor assault and battery offenses (42.0 percent).

    ALL

    35

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Status Offense Petitions

    Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Category

    RUNAWAY CURFEW 0.2%0.2%

    TRUANCY INCORRIGIBLE 2.3% 0.1%

    OTHER STATUS

    OFFENSES 97.2%

    Source: Table 19. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.

    In 2015, of the 11,054 petitioned status offenses reported:

    zz 2.3 percent (251) were for truancy.

    zz 0.2 percent (19) were for running away.

    zz 0.2 percent (26) were for violating curfew.

    zz 0.1 percent (9) were for incorrigibility.

    zz 97.2 percent (10,749) were for other status offenses, the majority of which were violations of court orders.

    Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Gender

    MALE 78.9%

    FEMALE 21.1%

    Source: Table 24.

    In 2015:

    zz 78.9 percent (8,719) of petitions for status offenses were male.

    zz 21.1 percent (2,335) of petitions for status offenses were female.

    36

  • Petitions

    Status Offense Petitions

    Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Age Group

    12-14 9.9%18-24

    21.9%

    15-17 68.2%

    Source: Table 24.

    In 2015:

    zz Two petitions for status offenses were filed for juveniles under the age of 12.

    zz 9.9 percent (1,091) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1214 age group.

    zz 68.2 percent (7,536) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1517 age group.

    zz 21.9 percent (2,425) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1824 age group.

    Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group

    OTHER

    Source: Table 24.

    5.5%

    WHITE 19.8%BLACK

    19.7%

    HISPANIC 55.1%

    In 2015:

    zz 19.8 percent (2,186) of those petitioned for status offenses were white.

    zz 55.1 percent (6,090) of those petitioned for status offenses were Hispanic.

    zz 19.7 percent (2,174) of those petitioned for status offenses were black.

    zz 5.5 percent (604) of those petitioned for status offenses were from other race/ethnic groups.

    37

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Defense Representation

    Defense Representation, 2015 By Type

    NOT REPRESENTED

    1.2%

    REPRESENTED 98.8%

    6.3%

    70.4%22.4%

    0.8%

    0PRIVATE COURT- PUBLIC 100OTHERCOUNSEL APPOINTED DEFENDER

    COUNSEL

    Source: Table 20.

    In 2015, of the 36,008 known defense representations reported:

    zz 98.8 percent (35,576) of the juveniles were represented by counsel.

    zz 1.2 percent (432) of the juveniles were not represented by counsel.

    Defense Representation, 2015 Gender by Type

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    PRIVATE PUBLICCOURT-APPOINTED OTHERCOUNSEL DEFENDERCOUNSEL

    Source: Table 20.

    FEMALE

    MALE 6.9%

    69.3%22.9%

    4.2% 20.3%

    0.6%74.9%

    0.9%

    In 2015, of the 35,576 juveniles represented by counsel:

    zz Males were represented by private counsel more than females (6.9 vs. 4.2 percent).

    zz Females were represented by a public defender more than males (74.9 vs. 69.3 percent).

    38

  • Petitions

    12

    Defense Representation, 2015 Age Group by Type

    UNDER

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    0 20 40 60 80 100PERCENT

    20.4% 5.5%

    23.2%

    20.4% 7.7%

    70.0%

    73.4% 0.6%

    0.9%

    0.7%

    69.7%

    71.2%

    25.6% 4.4%

    6.2%

    PRIVATE PUBLICCOURT-APPOINTED OTHERCOUNSEL DEFENDERCOUNSEL

    Source: Table 20.

    Defense Representation

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of age group, the proportional breakdown of defense representation was similar.

    PERCENT

    0.4%11.0%

    21.3% 5.8%

    34.1% 3.1%

    14.3%9.9%

    15.1% 73.4%

    72.5% 0.5%

    2.4%

    0.7%

    60.4%

    75.1%

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    PRIVATE COUNSEL

    COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL

    PUBLIC DEFENDER OTHER

    Source: Table 20.

    Defense Representation, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the majority of juveniles were represented by a public defender.

    39

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Fitness Hearings

    Fitness Hearings, 2015 By Outcome

    UNFITFIT 55.9%44.1%

    Source: Table 28.

    In 2015, of the 136 fitness hearings reported:

    zz 55.9 percent (76) were determined to be unfit for juvenile court and were transferred to adult court for trial.

    zz 44.1 percent (60) were determined to be fit and remained in the juvenile system.

    Fitness Hearings, 2015 Gender by Outcome

    MALE

    FEMALE

    42.4% 57.6%

    100.0%

    0 20 40 60 PERCENT

    80 100

    FIT UNFIT

    Source: Table 28.

    In 2015:

    zz All four females that participated in fitness hearings were found to be fit.

    zz 57.6 percent of males were found unfit.

    40

  • Petitions

    Fitness Hearings, 2015 Age by Outcome

    14 66.7% 33.3%

    75.0% 25.0%

    40.7% 59.3%

    38.0% 62.0%

    45.8% 54.2%

    15

    16

    17

    ALL OTHER

    0 20

    Source: Table 28.

    40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    FIT UNFIT

    Fitness Hearings

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles aged 14 and 15 were found to be fit to remain in the juvenile justice system at a higher percentage than all other age groups.

    Fitness Hearings, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Outcome

    WHITE 28.6% 71.4%

    35.2% 64.8%

    62.2% 37.8%

    50.0% 50.0%

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    FIT UNFIT

    Source: Table 28.

    In 2015:

    zz A smaller percentage of whites were found to be fit to remain in the juvenile system compared to the percentage of Hispanic and black juveniles (28.6 vs. 35.2 and 62.2 percent, respectively).

    41

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Juvenile Court Dispositions

    Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 By Type

    OTHER

    5.5% INFORMAL PROBATION

    6.7%

    NON-WARD PROBATION

    6.7%

    WARDSHIP 64.5%

    DISMISSED 16.7%

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported,

    diversion, and deferred entry of judgment.

    In 2015, of the 44,107 juvenile court dispositions:

    zz 64.5 percent (28,447) resulted in wardship probation.

    zz 16.7 percent (7,359) were dismissed.

    zz 6.7 percent (2,940) resulted in informal probation.

    zz 5.5 percent (2,404) resulted in non-ward probation.

    zz 6.7 percent (2,957) resulted in dispositions including transfer, remand to adult court, deportation, diversion, and deferred entry of judgment.

    Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Type

    MALE

    FEMALE

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    16.3% 4.9% 6.1%

    18.2% 9.0%

    65.8%

    59.1%

    6.9%

    7.6% 6.1%

    PERCENT

    DISMISSED INFORMAL PROBATION NON-WARD PROBATION

    WARDSHIP OTHER

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,

    and deferred entry of judgment.

    In 2015:

    zz Males received a wardship disposition more than females (65.8 vs. 59.1 percent).

    42

  • Petitions

    Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Type

    UNDER 12

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    PERCENT

    DISMISSED INFORMAL PROBATION NON-WARD PROBATION

    WARDSHIP OTHER

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,

    and deferred entry of judgment.

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    40.0% 22.0%

    16.6% 12.4%

    30.0%

    57.0% 7.4% 6.7%

    14.2% 5.3% 6.1%

    27.4%

    67.3%

    59.0%

    7.1%

    4.1% 4.6%

    4.9%

    7.0% 1.0%

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles under the age of 12 received informal probation or had their cases dismissed more than juveniles in any other age group.

    zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group received a wardship disposition more than juveniles in any other age group.

    Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    PERCENT

    NON-WARD INFORMALDISMISSED PROBATION PROBATION

    WARDSHIP OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    18.4% 7.1%

    10.2%

    15.7%

    55.8%

    66.3%

    8.5%

    5.2% 6.3%

    16.9% 4.6% 4.2%

    21.2%

    68.4%

    57.0%

    5.9%

    6.9% 6.3%

    8.5%

    6.5%

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,

    and deferred entry of judgment.

    Juvenile Court Dispositions

    In 2015:

    zz Whites received informal probation more than any other race/ethnic group.

    zz Hispanics and blacks received a greater percentage of wardships than whites or other race/ethnic groups.

    43

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Wardship Probation

    Wardship Probation, 2015 By Placement Type

    DJJ 0.8%

    NON-SECURE COUNTY FACILITY

    2.1% SECURE COUNTY FACILITY 30.2%

    OTHER 13.7%

    HOME 53.3%

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.

    In 2015, of the 28,447 wardship probation placements:

    zz 53.3 percent (15,175) returned to their own home or a relatives home.

    zz 30.2 percent (8,580) were sent to a secure county facility.

    zz 2.1 percent (587) were sent to a non-secure facility.

    zz 0.8 percent (216) were placed with the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).

    zz 13.7 percent (3,889) were sent to "other" facilities.

    Wardship Probation, 2015 Gender by Placement Type

    MALE

    FEMALE

    PERCENT

    HOME SECURE COUNTY NON-SECURE COUNTY

    FACILITY FACILITY

    DJJ OTHER

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    52.7%

    1.4%56.1%

    2.2% 31.5%

    23.9%

    12.7%0.9%

    18.2%0.3%

    In 2015:

    zz Males were committed to a secure county facility more than females (31.5 vs. 23.9 percent).

    zz Females were returned to their own home or a relatives home more than males (56.1 vs. 52.7 percent).

    44

  • Petitions

    12

    Wardship Probation, 2015

    80.0%

    59.7%

    51.4%

    57.9%

    0.1% 2.3%

    16.7%

    24.1% 13.8%

    0.7% 2.4%

    30.2% 15.3%

    1.4% 0.4%

    35.0%

    3.3%

    5.3%

    40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    NON-SECURE

    COUNTY SECURE

    COUNTY FACILITY FACILITY

    Age Group by Placement Type

    UNDER

    12-14

    15-17

    18-24

    0 20

    HOME

    DJJ OTHER

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.

    Wardship Probation

    In 2015:

    zz Juveniles under 12 were returned to their own home or a relatives home more than any other age group.

    zz As the juveniles' age increased, so did the percentage of placements in secure county facilities.

    zz Regardless of age group, juveniles were least likely placed with the DJJ.

    Wardship Probation, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Placement Type

    57.5%

    51.1%

    54.0%

    65.3%

    0.7% 2.3%

    2.1% 26.9%

    33.6%

    12.9%

    12.4%

    1.1% 1.3%

    25.0% 18.5%

    0.9% 3.1%

    23.0% 7.8%

    0.6% WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    NON-SECURESECUREHOME COUNTY FACILITY FACILITY COUNTY

    DJJ OTHER

    Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.

    In 2015:

    zz A greater percentage of Hispanics were committed to a secure county facility than any other race/ethnic group.

    45

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    46

  • 47

    Adult Court Dispositions Juveniles can be transferred to the adult justice system for prosecution at the discretion of the district attorney or if they fail a juvenile court fitness hearing. In 2015, probation departments reported 566 transfers to the adult system.

    The adult-level disposition information in this section pertains to the 416 final dispositions received in 2015 and examines adult-level dispositions by gender, age, race/ethnic group, offense, and disposition. The data were obtained from the DOJs Offender-Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) file. If a person is arrested for multiple offenses, OBTS selects only the most serious offense based on the severity of possible punishment. If there are multiple court dispositions, OBTS selects the most serious court disposition and the associated offense (see additional data limitations in Appendix 2).

    Note: Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Adult Court Dispositions

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Gender

    Source: Table 31.

    MALE 94.7%

    FEMALE 5.3%

    In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:

    zz 94.7 percent (394) were male.

    zz 5.3 percent (22) were female.

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Age

    14 YEARS 4.1%

    15 YEARS 12.0%

    17 YEARS 54.1% 16 YEARS

    29.8%

    Source: Table 31.

    In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:

    zz 4.1 percent (17) were 14 years of age at the time of arrest.

    zz 12.0 percent (50) were 15 years of age at the time of arrest.

    zz 29.8 percent (124) were 16 years of age at the time of arrest.

    zz 54.1 percent (225) were 17 years of age at the time of arrest.

    48

  • Adult Court Dispositions

    Adult Court Dispositions

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group

    OTHER 4.6%

    WHITE 12.0%

    BLACK 25.5%

    HISPANIC 57.9%

    Source: Table 31.

    In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:

    zz 12.0 percent (50) were white.

    zz 57.9 percent (241) were Hispanic.

    zz 25.5 percent (106) were black.

    zz 4.6 percent (19) were from other race/ethnic groups.

    49

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Adult Court Dispositions

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Type of Disposition

    CONVICTED 88.0%

    CERTIFIED TO JUVENILE

    COURT 0.2%

    ACQUITTED 0.5%

    DISMISSED 11.3%

    Source: Table 30.

    In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:

    zz 88.0 percent (366) resulted in a conviction.

    zz 11.3 percent (47) were dismissed.

    zz 0.5 percent (2) were acquitted.

    zz 0.2 percent (1) were certified to juvenile court.

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Type of Disposition

    0.3% MALE 88.3% 10.9% 0.5%

    FEMALE 81.8% 18.2%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    CONVICTED DISMISSED

    CERTIFIED TO ACQUITTEDJUVENILE COURT

    Source: Table 30.

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of gender, age, and race/ethnicity juveniles in adult court were convicted in the majority of cases.

    50

  • Adult Court Dispositions

    14.5%

    8.4%

    12.0%

    23.5% 14 76.5%

    15 88.0%

    16 84.7%

    17 90.7%

    0

    Source: Table 30.

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Age by Type of Disposition

    20 40 60 80 PERCENT

    CONVICTED DISMISSED

    CERTIFIED TO ACQUITTEDJUVENILE COURT

    0.8%

    0.4%

    0.4%

    100

    Adult Court Dispositions

    In 2015:

    zz 88.0 percent of juveniles between the ages of 14-17 were convicted.

    0 20 40 60 PERCENT

    CONVICTED

    80

    DISMISSED

    100

    CERTIFIED TO JUVENILE COURT ACQUITTED

    Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type of Disposition

    WHITE

    HISPANIC

    BLACK

    OTHER

    14.0%86.0%

    88.8% 10.0%

    86.8% 13.2%

    89.5% 10.5%

    0.4% 0.8%

    Source: Table 30.

    In 2015:

    zz All juveniles sent to adult court had a high percentage of convictions regardless of their race/ethnic group.

    51

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    Convictions

    Adult Court Convictions, 2015 By Type of Sentence

    OTHER JAIL 2.5% 3.8%

    ADULT PRISON/

    PROBATION

    DJJ 59.6%

    WITH JAIL 31.1%

    PROBATION 3.0%

    Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.

    In 2015, of the 366 convictions received:

    zz 59.6 percent (218) were sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).

    zz 3.0 percent (11) received probation.

    zz 31.1 percent (114) received probation with jail.

    zz 3.8 percent (14) received jail.

    zz 2.5 percent (9) received another sentence.

    Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Gender by Type of Sentence

    MALE 2.6%

    FEMALE

    0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT

    ADULT PRISON/DJJ

    PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL

    JAIL OTHER

    Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.

    61.5%

    72.2%22.2%

    2.9% 29.0%

    5.6%

    4.0%

    In 2015:

    zz More males than females were sent to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice (61.5 vs. 22.2 percent).

    zz Females were sentenced to probation/jail more than males (72.2 vs. 29.0 percent).

    52

  • Adult Court Dispositions

    17

    Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Age by Type of Sentence

    14

    6.8%15

    1.9%16

    2.0%

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    69.2%

    59.3% 33.3%

    45.5%

    64.8% 27.6%

    3.4%2.0%

    23.1%

    2.9%

    7.7%

    9.1% 31.8%

    6.8%

    2.9%

    PERCENT

    ADULT PRISON/DJJ

    PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL

    JAIL OTHER

    Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.

    Convictions

    In 2015:

    zz Regardless of age, juveniles convicted in adult court were most likely to be sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice.

    Note: "Other" includes other and fines.

    53

    Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type of Sentence

    WHITE

    1.4%HISPANIC

    BLACK

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    48.8% 4.7%

    23.5% 64.7%

    34.9%

    62.6% 29.4% 5.1%

    64.1% 27.2% 2.2%

    1.4%

    2.2%

    5.9% 5.9%

    11.6%

    4.3%

    OTHER

    PERCENT

    ADULT PRISON/DJJ

    PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL

    JAIL OTHER

    Source: Table 30.

    In 2015:

    zz Hispanic and black race/ethnic groups were sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice more than white and "other" race/ethnic groups.

  • Juvenile Justice in California, 2015

    54

  • 56

    Table 1JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015

    Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group by Level of Offense and Law Enforcement Disposition

    Level of offense and lawenforcement disposition Total

    Gender Male Female Under 12

    Age group 12-14 15-17 White

    Race/ethnic group Hispanic Black Other

    Total 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181

    Felony Misdemeanor Status offenses

    21,381 41,848 8,694

    17,879 28,420 5,394

    3,502 13,428 3,300

    314 579 91

    4,808 10,736 1,915

    16,259 30,533 6,688

    3,756 10,017 2,156

    11,113 22,284

    4,982

    5,429 6,825 1,180

    1,083 2,722

    376 Law enforcement disposition 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Referred to probation Counseled and released Turned over to other agency

    58,020 12,973

    930

    42,545 8,469

    679

    15,475 4,504

    251

    723 248

    13 Percent

    13,793 3,419

    247

    43,504 9,306

    670

    12,640 3,075

    214

    31,029 6,867

    483

    11,102 2,148

    184

    3,249 883

    49

    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Felony Misdemeanor

    29.7 58.2

    34.6 55.0

    17.3 66.4

    31.9 58.8

    27.5 61.5

    30.4 57.1

    23.6 62.9

    29.0 58.1

    40.4 50.8

    25.9 65.1

    Status offenses 12.1 10.4 16.3 9.2 11.0 12.5 13.5 13.0 8.8 9.0 Law enforcement disposition 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Referred to probation Counseled and released

    80.7 18.0

    82.3 16.4

    76.5 22.3

    73.5 25.2

    79.0 19.6

    81.3 17.4

    79.4 19.3

    80.8 17.9

    82.6 16.0

    77.7 21.1

    Turned over to other agency 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2

    Number

    Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Table 2JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015

    Offense Level and Category by Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group

    Offense level and category Total Gender

    Male Female Under 12 Age group

    12-14 15-17 White Race/ethnic group

    Hispanic Black OtherNumber

    Total... 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Felony

    Violent offensesProperty offenses Drug offensesAll other offenses

    21,381 7,341 6,685 1,533 5,822

    17,879 5,918 5,631 1,334 4,996

    3,502 1,423 1,054

    199 826

    314 89

    114 5

    106

    4,808 1,713 1,397

    239 1,459

    16,259 5,539 5,174 1,289 4,257

    3,756 1,208 1,101

    386 1,061

    11,113 3,527 3,353

    861 3,372

    5,429 2,265 1,951

    160 1,053

    1,083 341 280 126 336

    MisdemeanorAssault and batteryTheftDrug and alcoholMalicious mischiefAll other

    41,848 9,753 7,733 8,436 5,629

    10,297

    28,420 6,275 4,205 6,188 4,235 7,517

    13,428 3,478 3,528 2,248 1,394 2,780

    579 237

    93 41

    105 103

    10,736 3,085 1,851 1,733 1,816 2,251

    30,533 6,431 5,789 6,662 3,708 7,943

    10,017 2,191 1,729 2,614 1,178 2,305

    22,284 4,926 3,858 4,756 3,153 5,591

    6,825 2,141 1,531

    555 1,031 1,567

    2,722 495 615 511 267 834

    Status offenses 8,694 5,394 3,300 91 Percent

    1,915 6,688 2,156 4,982 1,180 376

    Total 100.0 71.9 28.1 1.4 24.3 74.4 22.1 53.4 18.7 5.8 Felony

    Violent offenses100.0 100.0

    83.6 80.6

    16.4 19.4

    1.5 1.2

    22.5 23.3

    76.0 75.5

    17.6 16.5

    52.0 48.0

    25.4 30.9

    5.1 4.6

    Property offensesDrug offensesAll other offenses

    100.0 100.0 100.0

    84.2 87.0 85.8

    15.8 13.0 14.2

    1.7 0.3 1.8

    20.9 15.6 25.1

    77.4 84.1 73.1

    16.5 25.2 18.2

    50.2 56.2 57.9

    29.2 10.4 18.1

    4.2 8.2 5.8

    Misdemeanor 100.0 67.9 32.1 1.4 25.7 73.0 23.9 53.2 16.3 6.5 Assault and battery Theft.

    100.0 100.0

    64.3 54.4

    35.7 45.6

    2.4 1.2

    31.6 23.9

    65.9 74.9

    22.5 22.4

    50.5 49.9

    22.0 19.8

    5.1 8.0

    Drug and alcoholMalicious mischief

    100.0 100.0

    73.4 75.2

    26.6 24.8

    0.5 1.9

    20.5 32.3

    79.0 65.9

    31.0 20.9

    56.4 56.0

    6.6 18.3

    6.1 4.7

    All other 100.0 73.0 27.0 1.0 21.9 77.1 22.4 54.3 15.2 8.1 Status offenses 100.0 62.0 38.0 1.0 22.0 76.9 24.8 57.3 13.6 4.3

    57

    Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Table 3JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015

    Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group by Offense Level and Category

    Offense level and category otal GenderMale Female Under 12 Age group

    12-14 15-17 White Race/ethnic group

    Hispanic Black Other

    Total 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Felony Violent offenses

    21,381 7,341

    17,879 5,918

    3,502 1,423

    314 89

    4,808 1,713

    16,259 5,539

    3,756 1,208

    11,113 3,527

    5,429 2,265

    1,083 341

    Property offenses Drug offenses All other offenses

    6,685 1,533 5,822

    5,631 1,334 4,996

    1,054 199 826

    114 5

    106

    1,397 239

    1,459

    5,174 1,289 4,257

    1,101 386

    1,061

    3,353 861

    3,372

    1,951 160

    1,053

    280 126 336

    Misdemeanor Assault and battery Theft Drug and alcohol Malicious mischief

    41,848 9,753 7,733 8,436 5,629

    28,420 6,275 4,205 6,188 4,235

    13,428 3,478 3,528 2,248 1,394

    579 237

    93 41

    105

    10,736 3,085 1,851 1,733 1,816

    30,533 6,431 5,789 6,662 3,708

    10,017 2,191 1,729 2,614 1,178

    22,284 4,926 3,858 4,756 3,153

    6,825 2,141 1,531

    555 1,031

    2,722 495 615 511 267

    All other 10,297 7,517 2,780 103 2,251 7,943 2,305 5,591 1,567 834 Status offenses Truancy Runaway Curfew

    8,694 1,174 2,998 1,918

    5,394 800

    1,470 1,300

    3,300 374

    1,528 618

    91 4

    39 12

    1,915 276 773 309

    6,688 894

    2,186 1,597

    2,156 149 891 487

    4,982 860

    1,566 1,064

    1,180 129 424 222

    376 36

    117 145

    Incorrigible Other status offenses

    7671,837

    439 1,385

    328 452

    25 11

    Percent

    229 328

    513 1,498

    280 349

    361 1,131

    112 293

    14 64

    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Felony Violent offenses

    100.0 34.3

    100.0 33.1

    100.0 40.6

    100.0 28.3

    100.0 35.6

    100.0 34.1

    100.0 32.2

    100.0 31.7

    100.0 41.7

    100.0 31.5

    Property offenses Drug offenses All other offenses

    31.3 7.2

    27.2

    31.5 7.5

    27.9

    30.1 5.7

    23.6

    36.3 1.6

    33.8

    29.1 5.0

    30.3

    31.8 7.9

    26.2

    29.3 10.3 28.2

    30.2 7.7

    30.3

    35.9 2.9

    19.4

    25.9 11.6 31.0

    Misdemeanor 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Assault and battery Theft

    23.3 18.5

    22.1 14.8

    25.9 26.3

    40.9 16.1

    28.7 17.2

    21.1 19.0

    21.9 17.3

    22.1 17.3

    31.4 22.4

    18.2 22.6

    Drug and alcohol Malicious mischief

    20.2 13.5

    21.8 14.9

    16.7 10.4

    7.1 18.1

    16.1 16.9

    21.8 12.1

    26.1 11.8

    21.3 14.1

    8.1 15.1

    18.8 9.8

    All other 24.6 26.4 20.7 17.8 21.0 26.0 23.0 25.1 23.0 30.6 Status offenses 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Truancy Runaway Curfew

    13.5 34.5 22.1

    14.8 27.3 24.1

    11.3 46.3 18.7

    4.4 42.9 13.2

    14.4 40.4 16.1

    13.4 32.7 23.9

    6.9 41.3 22.6

    17.3 31.4 21.4

    10.9 35.9 18.8

    9.6 31.1 38.6

    Incorrigible Other status offenses

    8.8 21.1

    8.1 25.7

    9.9 13.7

    27.5 12.1

    12.0 17.1

    7.7 22.4

    13.0 16.2

    7.2 22.7

    9.5 24.8

    3.7 17.0

    T Number

    58

    Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

  • Table 4JUVENILE FELONY ARRESTS, 2015

    Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition

    Category and offense Total Ge

    Male

    nder

    Female Under 12

    Age group

    12-14 15-17

    Number

    White

    Race/eth

    Hispanic

    nic group

    Black Other

    Law enfoReferred to probation

    rcement dispoCounseled

    and released

    sitionTurned

    over

    Total 21,381 17,879 3,502 314 4,808 16,259 3,756 11,113 5,429 1,083 19,702 1,349 330

    Violent offenses 7,341 5,918 1,423 89 1,713 5,539 1,208 3,527 2,265 341 6,868 372 101

    Homicide 88 85 3 0 7 81 9 51 25 3 82 6 0 Rape 250 Robbery 2,597 Assault 4,329 Kidnapping 77

    242 2,230 3,296

    65

    8 367

    1,033 12

    1 13 70 5

    70 179 473 2,111

    1,144 3,115 19 53

    62 228 894 15

    120 1,076 2,241

    39

    56 1,189

    974 21

    12 104 220

    2

    235 2,460 4,014

    77

    13 103 250

    0

    2 34 65 0

    Property offenses 6,685 5,631 1,054 114 1,397 5,174 1,101 3,353 1,951 280 6,167 408 110

    Burglary 3,506 Theft 1,426 Motor vehicle theft 1,485 Forgery, checks, access cards 80 Arson 188

    3,148 1,114 1,149

    58 162

    358 312 336 22 26

    77 6 8 0

    23

    795 2,634 251 1,169 246 1,231 16 64 89 76

    547 218 241 28 67

    1,659 740 839 30 85

    1,173 393 343 21 21

    127 75 62 1

    15

    3,261 1,303 1,377

    70 156

    166 107 96 9

    30

    79 16 12 1 2

    Drug offenses 1,533 1,334 199 5 239 1,289 386 861 160 126 1,354 158 21

    Narcotics 279 246 33 1 41 237 90 140 30 19 253 21 5 Marijuana 879 Dangerous drugs 351 Other drug violations 24

    788 284 16

    91 67 8

    3 0 1

    161 715 35 316 2 21

    204 86 6

    493 211 17

    100 29 1

    82 25 0

    753 326 22

    111 24 2

    15 1 0

    All other offenses 5,822 4,996 826 106 1,459 4,257 1,061 3,372 1,053 336 5,313 411 98

    Manslaughter-vehicle 1 Lewd or lascivious 370

    0 352

    1 18

    0 16

    0 1 162 192

    0 93

    1 206

    0 57

    0 14

    1 347

    0 18

    0 5

    Other sex 296 224 72 5 104 187 76 159 40 21 258 27 11 Weapons 2,173 Driving under the influence 29

    1,955 25

    218 4

    37 0

    553 1,583 0 29

    323 8

    1,374 18

    370 0

    106 3

    1,930 26

    215 1

    28 2

    Hit-and-run 36 32 4 0 1 35 6 22 6 2 35 0 1 Escape 13 Bookmaking 0 Other felonies 2,904

    9 0

    2,399

    4 0

    505

    0 0

    48

    3 10 0 0

    636 2,220

    3 0

    552

    8 0

    1,584

    2 0

    578

    0 0

    190

    12 0

    2,704

    0 0

    150

    1 0

    50

    59

    (continued)

  • Table 4 - continued JUVENILE FELONY ARRESTS, 2015

    Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition Gender Age group Race/ethnic group Law enforcement disposition

    Category and offense TotalMale Female Under 12 12-14 15-17 White Hispanic Black Other Referred to probation

    Counseledand released

    Turnedover

    Percent Total 100.0 83.6 16.4 1.5 22.5 76.0 17.6 52.0 25.4 5.1 92.1 6.3 1.5

    Violent offenses 100.0 80.6 19.4 1.2 23.3 75.5 16.5 48.0 30.9 4.6 93.6 5.1 1.4

    Homicide 100.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 8.0 92.0 10.2 58.0 28.4 3.4 93.2 6.8 0.0 Rape 100.0 96.8 3.2 0.4 28.0 71.6 24.8 48.0 22.4 4.8 94.0 5.2 0.8 Robbery 100.0 85.9 14.1 0.5 18.2 81.3 8.8 41.4 45.8 4.0 94.7 4.0 1.3 Assault 100.0 76.1 23.9 1.6 26.4 72.0 20.7 51.8 22.5 5.1 92.7 5.8 1.5 Kidnapping 100.0 84.4 15.6 6.5 24.7 68.8 19.5 50.6 27.3 2.6 100.0 0.0 0.0

    Property offenses 100.0 84.2 15.8 1.7 20.9 77.4 16.5 50.2 29.2 4.2 92.3 6.1 1.6

    Burglary 100.0 89.8 10.2 2.2 22.7 75.1 15.6 47.3 33.5 3.6 93.0 4.7 2.3 Theft 100.0 78.1 21.9 0.4 17.6 82.0 15.3 51.9 27.6 5.3 91.4 7.5 1.1 Motor vehicle theft 100.0 77.4 22.6 0.5 16.6 82.9 16.2 56.5 23.1 4.2 92.7 6.5 0.8 Forgery, checks, access cards 100.0 72.5 27.5 0.0 20.0 80.0 35.0 37.5 26.3 1.3 87.5 11.3 1.3 Arson 100.0 86.2 13.8 12.2 47.3 40.4 35.6 45.2 11.2 8.0 83.0 16.0 1.1

    Drug offenses 100.0 87.0 13.0 0.3 15.6 84.1 25.2 56.2 10.4 8.2 88.3 10.3 1.4

    Narcotics 100.0 88.2 11.8 0.4 14.7 84.9 32.3 50.2 10.8 6.8 90.7 7.5 1.8 Marijuana 100.0 89.6 10.4 0.3 18.3 81.3 23.2 56.1 11.4 9.3 85.7 12.6 1.7 Dangerous drugs 100.0 80.9 19.1 0.0 10.0 90.0 24.5 60.1 8.3 7.1 92.9 6.8 0.3 Other drug violations 100.0 66.7 33.3 4.2 8.3 87.5 25.0 70.8 4.2 0.0 91.7 8.3 0.0

    All other offenses 100.0 85.8 14.2 1.8 25.1 73.1 18.2 57.9 18.1 5.8 91.3 7.1 1.7

    Manslaughter-vehicle 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Lewd or lascivious 100.0 95.1 4.9 4.3 43.8 51.9 25.1 55.7 15.4 3.8 93.8 4.9 1.4 Other sex 100.0 75.7 24.3 1.7 35.1 63.2 25.7 53.7 13.5 7.1 87.2 9.1 3.7 Weapons 100.0 90.0 10.0 1.7 25.4 72.8 14.9 63.2 17.0 4.9 88.8 9.9 1.3 Driving under the influence 100.0 86.2 13.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 27.6 62.1 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.4 6.9

    Hit-and-run 100.0 88.9 11.1 0.0 2.8 97.2 16.7 61.1 16.7 5.6 97.2 0.0 2.8 Escape 100.0 69.2 30.8 0.0 23.1 76.9 23.1 61.5 15.4 0.0 92.3 0.0 7.7 Bookmaking 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Other felonies 100.0 82.6 17.4 1.7 21.9 76.4 19.0 54.5 19.9 6.5 93.1 5.2 1.7

    60

    Notes: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.

    Dash indicates that a percent change/percent was not calculated.

  • Table 5JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS, 2015

    Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition

    Category and offense TotalGender

    Male Female Under 12

    Age group

    12-14 15-17

    Number

    White

    Race/ethnic group

    Hispanic Black Other

    Law enfoReferred to probation

    rcement dispositionCounseled

    and releasedTurned

    over

    Total 41,848 28,420 13,428 579 10,736 30,533 10,017 22,284 6,825 2,722 33,226 8,094 528

    Assault and battery 9,753 6,275 3,478 237 3,085 6,431 2,191 4,926 2,141 495 8,225 1,388 140

    Theft 7,733 4,205 3,528 93 1,851 5,789 1,729 3,858 1,531 615 5,829 1,793 111 Petty theft...Other theft

    7,265 468

    3,837 368

    3,428 100

    89 4

    1,725 5,451 126 338

    1,617 112

    3,634 224

    1,425 106

    589 26

    5,439 390

    1,723 70

    103 8

    Drug and alcohol 8,436 6,188 2,248 41 1,733 6,662 2,614 4,756 555 511 6,671 1,678 87 MarijuanaOther drugsDrunkLiquor lawsDriving under the influence

    3,378 1,801 1,110 1,659

    488

    2,580 1,304

    792 1,132

    380

    798 497 318 527 108

    37 2 0 1 1

    1,056 2,285 252 1,547 198 912 222 1,436

    5 482

    948 543 337 617 169

    1,927 1,040

    666 856 267

    311 104 47 80 13

    192 114 60

    106 39

    2,571 1,531

    853 1,294

    422

    782 246 240 353 57

    25 24 17 12 9

    Malicious mischief. 5,629 4,235 1,394 105 1,816 3,708 1,178 3,153 1,031 267 4,374 1,196 59 Disorderly conductDisturbing the peaceVandalismMalicious mischief.

    1251,927 2,245

    89

    104 1,187 1,898

    81

    21 740 347

    8

    1 31 48 1

    24 100 790 1,106 687 1,510 16 72

    48 318 515 24

    49 1,032 1,328

    35

    26 474 312 24

    2 103 90 6

    97 1,412 1,870

    68

    28 506 348 20

    0 9

    27 1

    Trespassing 1,243 965 278 24 299 920 273 709 195 66 927 294 22

    All other offenses 10,297 7,517 2,780 103 2,251 7,943 2,305 5,591 1,567 834 8,127 2,039 131 Manslaughter - misd. BurglaryChecks and access cards

    42,059

    46

    3 1,125

    36

    1 934 10

    0 22 1

    0 4 435 1,602 20 25

    1 433 13

    2 1,097

    15

    0 349 16