Juvenile Justice How the Philippine Justice System Treats Juvenile Delinquency_001
Juvenile Justice in California - 2015 Report - CJSC ... Justice in California, 2015 ... Juvenile...
Transcript of Juvenile Justice in California - 2015 Report - CJSC ... Justice in California, 2015 ... Juvenile...
-
The Role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center
is to:
Collect, analyze, and report statistical data that provide valid measures of crime and the criminal justice process.
Examine these data on an ongoing basis to better describe crime and the criminal justice system.
Promote the responsible presentation and use of crime statistics.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General
-
Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i
Juvenile Justice System at-a-Glance ........................................................................................... iv
Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................... vii Arrests ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Referrals ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Petitions ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 Adult Court Dispositions ........................................................................................................................ 47
Data Tables ....................................................................................................................................... 55
Appendices ......................................................................................................................................101 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 103 2 Data Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 104 3 California Code Sections .................................................................................................................... 106 4 Felony-Level Offense Codes ............................................................................................................. 108 5 Misdemeanor-Level Offense Codes ............................................................................................... 110 6 Juvenile Justice Glossary.................................................................................................................... 112
-
Executive Summary Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 provides insight into the juvenile justice process by reporting the number of arrests, referrals to probation departments, petitions filed, and dispositions for juveniles tried in juvenile and adult courts. Law enforcement agencies provide information on the number of arrests. Probation departments and Superior Courts provide information on the types of offenses and administrative actions taken by juvenile and adult courts.
The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is required to collect and report statistics on juvenile justice in California. Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 reflects data extracted from the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register, Offender-Based Transaction Statistics file, and the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System. (Appendix 1 describes the evolution of this system.) Referral and petition statistics were submitted to the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System by 55 of Californias 58 counties, representing over 99 percent of the states juvenile population. Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra counties are not included in the referral and petition sections of this report.
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015 presents juvenile justice statistics in four sections: Arrests, Referrals, Petitions, and Adult Court Dispositions. The arrest data were reported by law enforcement agencies and law enforcement referral data were reported by probation departments. Comparisons between arrest data and referral data should not be made because of differences in the way data were reported between the two sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.
zz The Arrests section presents information on the number of juveniles arrested, the types of arrest charges, and the demographic characteristics of the juveniles.
zz The Referrals section presents information on the number of juveniles referred to county probation departments, who referred the juveniles to the probation departments, the type of referral, the demographic characteristics of the juveniles referred, and the probation department dispositions.
zz The Petitions section presents information on cases where a petition was filed, including the number of petitions filed, the types of petitions filed, the demographic characteristics of the juveniles, and the dispositions for those petitions handled in juvenile court.
zz The Adult Court Dispositions section presents information on juveniles whose cases were processed in adult court, including the number of juveniles tried in adult court, the characteristics of the juveniles, and the adult court dispositions.
i
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Below is a summary of highlights from each of the sections.
Arrests
The Arrests section (pages 111) provides data on reported juvenile arrests made by law enforcement agencies in 2015.
zz More than half of the juveniles (58.2 percent) were arrested for a misdemeanor offense. Nearly a third (29.7 percent) were arrested for a felony offense, and the remainder (12.1 percent) were arrested for a status offense. (Table 1)
zz Eight out of ten juveniles arrested (80.7 percent) were referred to county juvenile probation departments. (Table 1)
Referrals
The Referrals section (pages 1327) provides data on juveniles who were brought to the attention of the county probation department in 2015.
zz Nearly nine out of ten juveniles referred to county probation departments (88.1 percent) were referred by law enforcement agencies. (Table 8)
zz Over one-fourth (27.7 percent) of juveniles referred to county probation departments were detained. (Table 13)
zz More than one-third (36.8 percent) of the juvenile cases referred to county probation departments were closed at intake, indicating that no further action was taken. (Table 13)
zz In half (51.0 percent) of the referrals to the probation departments, a petition was filed in juvenile court. (Table 13)
Petitions
The Petitions section (pages 2945) provides data on juvenile cases that proceeded to the juvenile court [for formal processing] in 2015.
zz Of the juveniles handled formally by the juvenile court, nearly two-thirds (64.5 percent) were made wards of the court. (Table 21)
zz One-sixth (16.7 percent) of the petitions for formal juvenile court adjudication were dismissed. (Table 21)
ii
-
iii
Executive Summary
Adult Court Dispositions
The Adult Court Dispositions section (pages 4753) provides data on juveniles processed through the adult court system.
zz Of the juveniles tried in adult court, 88.0 percent were convicted. (Table 30)
-
iv
At-a-Glance Juvenile Justice System, 2015
Probation Department Dispositions
86,539 100.0%
Public Agency/
Individual 5,088 5.9%
Other Sources
1,582 1.8%
Transfers 1,490 1.7%
Schools, Parents,
Private Agency/ Individual
2,095 2.4%
Arrests 71,923 100.0%
Juvenile Court
Dispositions 44,107 100.0%
Law Enforcement
Referral Cases 76,284 88.1%
Closed at Intake 31,830 36.8%
Informal Probation
2,165 2.5%
Diversion 5,600 6.5%
Referred to Probation
58,020 80.7%
Counseled and Released
12,973 18.0%
Turned Over 930
1.3%
Juvenile Arrests Juvenile Probation
Transferred1 2,345 2.7%
Petitions Filed
44,107 51.0%
Direct File in Adult Court
492 0.6%
Source: Tables 1, 8, 13, 21, and 30. Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
1Transferred includes traffic court and deported. 2In 2015, probation departments reported information on 566 transfers to the adult system. The adult court disposition information discussed here is for the 416 dispositions received in 2015.
-
Wardship 28,447 64.5%
Dismissed 7,359 16.7%
Diversion, Deferred Entry of Judgment,
or Transferred1 2,883 6.5%
Informal Probation
2,940 6.7%
Non-Ward Probation
2,404 5.5%
Remanded to Adult Court
74 0.2%
Own or Relatives
Home 15,175 53.3%
Secure County Facility 8,580 30.2%
Non-Secure County Facility
587 2.1%
Other Public or Private Agency 3,385 11.9%
Division of Juvenile Justice
216 0.8%
Other 504
1.8%
v
zz Arrest data were reported by law enforcement agencies and referral data were reported by probation departments. Data comparisons should not be made because of differences in the way data are reported between sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.
zz Typically, referrals are made to the probation department in the juveniles county of residence. The majority of referrals in this report came from police and sheriffs departments (88.1 percent). (Table 8)
zz Probation departments decide how to process referred cases. A case may be closed or transferred; a juvenile may be placed on informal probation or in a diversion program; or a petition may be sought for a court hearing.
zz Most formal juvenile court hearings resulted in the juvenile being made a ward of the court (64.5 percent). Most wards were allowed to go home under the supervision of the probation department (53.3 percent). (Table 21)
zz Juveniles can be transferred to the adult criminal justice system for prosecution if the district attorney files charges directly in adult court or remands to adult court after the juvenile fails a fitness hearing. Approximately nine out of ten dispositions received in adult court in 2015 resulted in a conviction (88.0 percent). (Table 30)
Juveniles to Adult Court
Adult Dispositions Received in
2015 416 2
100.0%
Convicted 366
88.0%
Acquitted 2
0.5%
Dismissed 47
11.3%
Jail 14
3.8% Certified to
Juvenile Court 1
0.2%
Other 9
2.5%
Adult Prison/ DJJ 218
59.6%
Probation 11
3.0%
Probation with Jail
114 31.1%
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
vi
-
Arrests A juvenile may be arrested for either violating a criminal statute or committing a status offense. Status offenses are acts that are offenses only when committed by a juvenile, such as curfew violations, truancy, running away, and incorrigibility.
This section contains information on the 71,923 juvenile arrests reported by law enforcement agencies in 2015. This section also includes information on the characteristics of juvenile arrests and arrestees, and the final law enforcement dispositions of those arrests. Although some arrests involve more than one offense, only the most serious are shown in this report. Arrest data for all 58 participating counties were extracted from the Monthly Arrest and Citation Register.
The law enforcement disposition of a juvenile arrest is affected by several variables: investigative findings and the facts surrounding the alleged offense; prior arrest record; seriousness of the offense; determined need for admonishment; recourse to other authority; and other factors determined by the individual case.
Law enforcement agencies have three methods for the disposition of a juvenile arrest:
zz Refer to probation departments for further processing. Some are handled at the probation level, and others are sent to juvenile and criminal courts for final disposition.
zz Handle within the department, where juveniles are counseled and released.
zz Turn over to another agency.
Notes: References to race/ethnicity will be made throughout this report. The subjectivity of the classification and labeling process must be considered in the analysis of race/ethnic group data. As commonly used, race refers to large populations that share certain physical characteristics, such as skin color. Because these physical characteristics can vary greatly within groups, as well as between groups, determination of race is frequently, by necessity, subjective. Ethnicity refers to cultural heritage and can cross racial lines. For example, the ethnic designation Hispanic can include persons of any race. Most commonly, self-identification of race/ethnicity is used in the classification and labeling process.
Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
1
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
2
Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Level of Offense
34.6% 55.0% 10.4%
17.3% 66.4% 16.3%
MALE
FEMALE
0 20 40 60 80 100
PERCENT
STATUS FELONY MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES
Source: Table 1.
Level of Offense
Juvenile Arrests, 2015 By Level of Offense
FELONY 29.7%
MISDEMEANOR 58.2%
STATUS OFFENSES
12.1%
Source: Table 1.
In 2015, of the 71,923 juvenile arrests reported:
zz Felony arrests accounted for 29.7 percent (21,381).
zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 58.2 percent (41,848).
zz Status offense arrests accounted for 12.1 percent (8,694).
In 2015, of the 51,693 arrests of males:
zz Felony arrests accounted for 34.6 percent (17,879).
zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 55.0 percent (28,420).
zz Status arrests accounted for 10.4 percent (5,394).
In 2015, of the 20,230 arrests of females:
zz Felony arrests accounted for 17.3 percent (3,502).
zz Misdemeanor arrests accounted for 66.4 percent (13,428).
zz Status arrests accounted for 16.3 percent (3,300).
-
Arrests
31.9%
27.5%
30.4%
58.8%
61.5%
57.1%
9.2%
11.0%
12.5%
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
0 20
FELONY
Source: Table 1.
Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee
By Level of Offense
40 60 80 100 PERCENT
STATUS MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES
In 2015:
zz Juveniles in each age group were arrested for similar proportions of felony, misdemeanor, and status offenses.
By Level of Offense
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20
FELONY
Juvenile Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee
23.6% 13.5%62.9%
29.0% 58.1% 13.0%
40.4% 50.8% 8.8%
25.9% 65.1% 9.0%
40 60
PERCENT
MISDEMEANOR
80 100
STATUS OFFENSES
Source: Table 1.
Level of Offense
In 2015, of the three defined race/ethnic groups:
zz A greater percentage of whites were arrested for a misdemeanor (62.9 percent) and status offenses (13.5 percent).
zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a felony (40.4 percent).
3
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
DRUG OFFENSES
7.2%
Source: Table 3.
Felony Arrests, 2015 By Category
ALL OTHER
OFFENSES 27.2%
VIOLENT OFFENSES
34.3%
PROPERTY OFFENSES
31.3%
Felony Arrests
In 2015, of the 21,381 juvenile felony arrests reported:
zz 34.3 percent (7,341) were for violent offenses.
zz 31.3 percent (6,685) were for property offenses.
zz 7.2 percent (1,533) were for drug offenses.
zz 27.2 percent (5,822) were for all other felony offenses.
MALE
FEMALE
VIOLENT OFFENSES
Source: Table 3.
Felony Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category
0 20 40 60 80 100
33.1% 7.5%
31.5%
40.6% 30.1% 23.6%5.7%
27.9%
PERCENT
PROPERTY DRUG ALL OTHER OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES
In 2015, of the 17,879 felony arrests of males:
zz Violent offenses accounted for 33.1 percent (5,918).
zz Property offenses accounted for 31.5 percent (5,631).
In 2015, of the 3,502 felony arrests of females:
zz Violent offenses accounted for 40.6 percent (1,423).
zz Property offenses accounted for 30.1 percent (1,054).
4
-
Arrests
Felony Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category
28.3% 36.3% 1.6%
33.8%
35.6% 5.0%
29.1% 30.3%
34.1% 7.9%
31.8% 26.2%
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG ALL OTHERVIOLENT PROPERTY OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES
Source: Table 3.
Felony Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
28.2%32.2%
30.2%31.7%
35.9%41.7%
25.9%31.5%
10.3%
7.7% 30.3%
19.4%
31.0%
2.9%
11.6%
29.3%
DRUG ALL OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES
Source: Table 3.
Felony Arrests
In 2015:
zz Juveniles in each age group were arrested for similar proportions of violent and property offenses.
zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group were more likely to be arrested for a felony drug offense than juveniles in any other age group (7.9 percent).
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a felony violent offense (41.7 percent) and a felony property offense (35.9 percent) than any other race/ethnic group.
zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the smallest proportion of felony arrests were for drug offenses.
5
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Misdemeanor Arrests
Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 By Category
ALL OTHER 24.6%
THEFT 18.5%
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13.5%
ASSAULT AND
BATTERY 23.3%
DRUG AND
ALCOHOL 20.2%
Source: Table 3.
In 2015, of the 41,848 juvenile misdemeanor arrests reported:
zz 23.3 percent (9,753) were for assault and battery.
zz 18.5 percent (7,733) were for theft offenses.
zz 20.2 percent (8,436) were for drug and alcohol offenses.
zz 13.5 percent (5,629) were for malicious mischief offenses.
zz 24.6 percent (10,297) were for all other misdemeanor offenses.
MALE
FEMALE
0
Source: Table 3.
Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category
22.1% 14.8% 21.8% 14.9% 26.4%
25.9% 26.3% 16.7% 10.4% 20.7%
20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG AND ASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOLAND BATTERY
MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER
In 2015:
zz Males were more likely to be arrested for a misdemeanor drug or alcohol offense than females (21.8 vs. 16.7 percent, respectively).
zz Females were more likely to be arrested for a misdemeanor theft offense than males (26.3 vs. 14.8 percent, respectively).
6
-
Arrests
7
Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category
40.9%
28.7%
21.1%
16.1%
17.2%
19.0%
7.1%
16.1%
21.8%
18.1%
16.9%
12.1%
17.8%
21.0%
26.0%
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG AND ASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOLAND BATTERY
MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER
Source: Table 3.
Misdemeanor Arrests
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of juveniles in the under 12 age group were arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery (40.9 percent) and malicious mischief (18.1 percent) than any other age category.
Misdemeanor Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100
11.8% 21.9%
17.3%22.1%
22.4%31.4%
22.6%18.2%
26.1%
21.3% 14.1%
15.1%
9.8%
8.1%
18.8%
17.3% 23.0%
25.1%
23.0%
30.6%
PERCENT
ASSAULT THEFTAND BATTERY
MALICIOUS ALL MISCHIEF OTHER
DRUG AND ALCOHOL
Source: Table 3.
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of whites were arrested for a misdemeanor drug or alcohol offense (26.1 percent) than any other race/ethnic group.
zz A greater percentage of blacks were arrested for a misdemeanor assault and battery offense (31.4 percent) than any other race/ ethnic group.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
8
Status Offense Arrests, 2015 By Category
TRUANCY 13.5%
RUNAWAY 34.5%
OTHER STATUS
OFFENSES 21.1%
CURFEW 22.1%
INCORRIGIBLE 8.8%
Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
Status Offense Arrests
In 2015, of the 8,694 status offenses reported:
zz Truancy violations accounted for 13.5 percent (1,174).
zz Runaways accounted for 34.5 percent (2,998).
zz Curfew violations accounted for 22.1 percent (1,918).
zz Incorrigible offenses accounted for 8.8 percent (767).
zz "Other" status offenses accounted for 21.1 percent (1,837).
Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Gender of Arrestee by Category
MALE
FEMALE
PERCENT
TRUANCY RUNAWAY CURFEW
INCORRIGIBLE OTHER STATUS OFFENSES
Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
0 20 40 60 80 100
14.8% 24.1%27.3%
11.3% 46.3% 13.7%18.7%
25.7% 8.1%
9.9%
In 2015:
zz Males were more likely to be arrested for curfew violations than females (24.1 vs. 18.7 percent).
zz Females were more likely to be arrested for being a runaway than males (46.3 vs. 27.3 percent).
-
Arrests
Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Age Group of Arrestee by Category
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
0 20 40 60 80 100
4.4% 27.5%
14.4% 16.1%
13.4% 23.9%
42.9%
40.4%
32.7%
17.1%
13.2%
22.4%
12.1%
12.0%
7.7%
PERCENT
CURFEWTRUANCY RUNAWAY
OTHER STATUS INCORRIGIBLE OFFENSES
Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
Status Offense Arrests
In 2015:
zz For all age groups there were a greater percentage of runaway arrests than any other status offense category.
zz A greater percentage of truancy arrests were in the 1214 age group than any other group (14.4 percent).
zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group were more likely to be arrested for a curfew violation than any other age group (23.9 percent).
Status Offense Arrests, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group of Arrestee by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100
16.2%6.9%
31.4%17.3%
35.9%10.9%
31.1%9.6%
22.6%
21.4% 22.7%
24.8%
17.0%
18.8%
38.6%
41.3% 13.0%
7.2%
9.5%
3.7%
PERCENT
TRUANCY CURFEW
OTHER STATUS
RUNAWAY
INCORRIGIBLE OFFENSES
Source: Table 3. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
In 2015:
zz White juveniles were arrested for runaway offenses more than any other race/ethnic group (41.3 percent).
9
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Law Enforcement Level Dispositions
Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 By Type of Disposition
TURNED OVER COUNSELED 1.3% & RELEASED
18.0%
REFERRED TO PROBATION
80.7%
Source: Table 1.
When processing juvenile arrestees, law enforcement agencies may refer juveniles to the probation department, counsel and release them, or turn them over to another agency.
In 2015, of the 71,923 law enforcement dispositions reported:
zz 80.7 percent resulted in a referral to probation (58,020).
zz 18.0 percent resulted in the juvenile being counseled and released (12,973).
zz 1.3 percent resulted in the juvenile being turned over to another agency (930).
Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Disposition
MALE
FEMALE
82.3% 16.4% 1.3%
76.5% 1.2%
22.3%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
COUNSELEDREFERRED TURNED AND RELEASEDTO PROBATION OVER
Source: Table 1.
In 2015:
zz Males were referred to the probation department more than females (82.3 vs. 76.5 percent).
zz Females were counseled and released more than males (22.3 vs. 16.4 percent).
10
-
Arrests
Law Enforcement Level Dispositions
Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Disposition
UNDER 12
0 20 40 60 80 100
73.5% 1.3%
79.0% 1.4%
81.3% 1.3%
25.2%
19.6%
17.4%
12-14
15-17
PERCENT
COUNSELEDREFERRED TURNED AND RELEASEDTO PROBATION OVER
Source: Table 1.
In 2015:
zz Regardless of age group, the majority of juvenile offenders were referred to probation.
zzJuveniles under 12 were counseled and released more than any other age group (25.2 percent).
Law Enforcement Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Disposition
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100
19.3%79.4%
17.9%80.8%
16.0%82.6%
21.1%77.7%
1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.2%
REFERRED TO PROBATION
Source: Table 1.
PERCENT
COUNSELED AND RELEASED
TURNED OVER
In 2015:
zz More than 77 percent of juveniles in each race/ethnic group were referred to probation departments by law enforcement.
11
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
12
-
13
Referrals Juvenile referrals occur when a juvenile is brought to the attention of the probation department for a case review. Juveniles can be referred by a variety of sources, with the largest percentage of referrals coming from law enforcement. Referrals may also be generated by schools, parents, public or private agencies, individuals, or by transfers from another county or state.
Referrals to the probation department consist of two types: new and subsequent. The term new referral applies to a juvenile who is not currently supervised by the probation department and is typically a first-time offender. The term subsequent referral applies to a juvenile who is currently supervised by the probation department. A subsequent referral generally results from a new arrest or probation violation.
After a juvenile is referred to the probation department, a probation officer determines whether the juvenile should be detained or released. The probation department also conducts an investigation and determines whether the case should be closed or transferred; whether the juvenile should be placed on informal probation; or whether a petition should be filed with the court.
This section examines referrals by gender, age group, and race/ethnic group. Direct filing into adult court occurs when a juvenile of a certain age commits an offense that is subject to mandatory filing by a prosecutor (Welfare and Institutions Code section 602(b)) or discretionary filing by a prosecutor (Welfare and Institutions Code section 707(d)). This process is separate from the fitness hearing process that is conducted in juvenile court and is highlighted in the Petitions section of this publication. For the purpose of this section, the term juvenile refers to those individuals processed through the juvenile court system.
The data used in this section originated from 55 participating county probation departments (Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra Counties are not included). This information was submitted to the DOJ from referrals reported in the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System (see Appendix 2).
Notes: Arrest data are reported by law enforcement agencies, whereas referral data are reported by probation departments. Comparisons between arrest data and referral data should not be made because of differences in the way data are reported between the two sources. See Appendix 2 for more detail.
Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
14
Referral Source and Type
Referrals, 2015 By Source
PUBLIC AGENCY/ TRANSFERS INDIVIDUAL 1.7% OTHER
5.9% SOURCES SCHOOL/PARENT/ 1.8%
GUARDIAN 2.4%
LAW ENFORCEMENT
88.1%
Source: Table 8.
In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals to probation reported:
zz 88.1 percent (76,284) were from law enforcement.
zz 2.4 percent (2,095) were from schools, parents, and private agencies and individuals.
zz 5.9 percent (5,088) were from public agencies or individuals.
zz 1.7 percent (1,490) were transfers from another county or state.
zz 1.8 percent (1,582) were from other sources.
Referrals, 2015 By Type
NEW 67.1%
SUBSEQUENT 32.9%
Source: Table 8.
In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals reported:
zz 67.1 percent (58,044) were new referrals.
zz 32.9 percent (28,495) were subsequent referrals.
-
Referrals
Referrals, 2015 By Level of Offense
STATUS OFFENSES
13.2%
FELONY 31.3%
MISDEMEANOR 55.5%
Source: Table 8.
Offense Level
In 2015, of the 115,668 referral offenses reported:
zz 31.3 percent (36,225) were for felonies.
zz 55.5 percent (64,182) were for misdemeanors.
zz 13.2 percent (15,261) were for status offenses.
Note: As many as five offenses can be reported for each referral. Consequently, the number of referral offenses is higher than the number of referrals.
15
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Referrals for Felony Offenses
Type of Referrals, 2015 By Category
DRUG OFFENSES
7.5%
OTHER OFFENSES
VIOLENT
30.2% OFFENSES
29.7%
PROPERTY OFFENSES
32.7%
Source: Table 9.
In 2015, of the 36,225 referrals for felony offenses:
zz 29.7 percent (10,742) were for violent offenses.
zz 32.7 percent (11,843) were for property offenses.
zz 7.5 percent (2,707) were for drug offenses.
zz 30.2 percent (10,933) were for other felony offenses.
Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Gender by Category
MALE
0 20 40 60 80 100
29.0% 7.3% 31.7%
33.6% 38.3% 19.6%8.5%
32.0%
FEMALE
PERCENT
DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES
Source: Table 9.
In 2015:
zz Females were referred to the probation department for felony property offenses more than males (38.3 vs. 31.7 percent).
16
-
Referrals
Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
18-24
23.2%
31.0%
30.0%
26.4%
49.4%
27.2%
33.5%
35.0%
0.4%
4.6% 37.2%
28.8%
28.2%
7.7%
10.4%
27.0%
0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT
DRUGPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSESOFFENSESOFFENSES
Source: Table 9.
100
OTHER OFFENSES
Referrals for Felony Offenses
In 2015:
zz Regardless of age group, juveniles were least likely to be referred to probation departments for a felony drug offense.
Referrals for Felony Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
25.8% 30.6% 10.0% 33.6%
26.9% 30.9% 8.6% 33.7%
38.8% 38.1% 2.7%
20.4%
28.4% 33.6% 10.0% 28.0%
0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT
100
DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES
Source: Table 9.
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of blacks were referred to the probation department for a violent offense (38.8 percent) than any other race/ ethnic group.
17
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015
By Category
ASSAULT AND
BATTERY 26.3%
DRUG AND
ALCOHOL 15.9%
THEFT 12.2%MALI-
CIOUS MISCHIEF 13.7%
ALL OTHER 32.0%
Source: Table 9.
In 2015, of the 64,182 misdemeanor referral offenses reported:
zz 26.3 percent (16,904) were for assault and battery.
zz 12.2 percent (7,804) were for theft offenses.
zz 15.9 percent (10,184) were for drug and alcohol offenses.
zz 13.7 percent (8,780) were for malicious mischief offenses.
zz 32.0 percent (20,510) were for all other misdemeanor offenses.
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015
Gender by Category
MALE
MALE
0
25.0% 10.2% 16.5% 14.9% 33.4%
29.8% 17.3% 14.2% 10.5% 28.2%
20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG AND MALICIOUS ALLASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEF OTHERAND BATTERY
Source: Table 9.
In 2015:
zz Males were referred to the probation department for misdemeanor drug and alcohol and malicious mischief offenses more than females.
zz Females were referred to the probation FEdepartment for misdemeanor assault and battery and theft offenses more than males.
18
-
Referrals
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
18-24
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
17.4%42.2%
12.7%32.9%
12.1%25.4%
11.8% 19.9%
4.7%
12.6% 17.6%
13.0%
10.7%
23.2%
24.2%
33.1%
38.5%
16.4%
19.0%
12.5%
DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY
Source: Table 9.
ALL OTHER
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses
In 2015:
zz Juveniles under 12 years of age were more than twice as likely as juveniles in the 1824 age group to be referred for assault and battery (42.2 vs. 19.9 percent).
zz The proportion of juveniles referred to probation departments for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses increased with age. Conversely, the proportion of juveniles referred to probation departments for misdemeanor assault and battery or malicious mischief decreased with age.
Referrals for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
22.8% 12.3% 19.8% 11.7% 33.3%
25.5% 10.7% 16.6% 14.4% 32.8%
35.7% 16.4% 6.9%
26.4%14.5%
24.0% 14.1% 16.4% 12.3% 33.2%
0 20 40 60 80 PERCENT
DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY
Source: Table 9.
100
ALL OTHER
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of whites were referred to probation departments for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses than any other race/ethnic group.
zz A greater percentage of blacks were referred to probation departments for a misdemeanor assault and battery offense than any other race/ethnic group.
19
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Status Offense Referrals
Source: Table 9. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
OTHERSTATUS
OFFENSES74.5%
TRUANCY 13.8%
Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Category
RUNAWAY 7.6%
CURFEW 2.5% INCORRIGIBLE
1.6%
In 2015, of the 15,261 referrals for status offenses:
zz 13.8 percent (2,107) were for truancy.
zz 7.6 percent (1,162) were for running away.
zz 2.5 percent (383) were for violating curfew.
zz 1.6 percent (247) were for incorrigibility.
zz 74.5 percent (11,362) were for other status offenses.
Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Gender
MALE 74.1%
FEMALE 25.9%
Source: Table 12.
In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:
zz 74.1 percent (11,308) were male, and 25.9 percent (3,953) were female.
20
-
Referrals
Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Age Group
UNDER 12
0.3%
12-14 13.7%18-24 18.3%
15-17 67.7%
Source: Table 12.
Status Offense Referrals
In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:
zz 0.3 percent (44) were juveniles under 12 years of age.
zz 13.7 percent (2,092) were juveniles in the 1214 age group.
zz 67.7 percent (10,328) were juveniles in the 1517 age group.
zz 18.3 percent (2,797) were juveniles in the 1824 age group.
Referrals for Status Offenses, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group
OTHER
Source: Table 12.
6.2%
WHITE 20.3%BLACK
18.1%
HISPANIC 55.5%
In 2015, of all referrals for status offenses:
zz 20.3 percent (3,092) were white.
zz 55.5 percent (8,467) were Hispanic.
zz 18.1 percent (2,762) were black.
zz 6.2 percent (940) were from other race/ethnic groups.
21
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Detentions
Detentions, 2015 By Type
NOT DETAINED
72.3%
DETAINED 27.7%
1.7%
95.6%
0 0 SECURE
FACILITY
2.7% NON-SECURE HOME 100 FACILITY SUPERVISION
In 2015, of the 79,098 known preadjudication detentions reported:
zz 72.3 percent (57,226) of juveniles were not detained.
zz 95.6 percent (20,904) of those juveniles detained were in a secure facility.
Source: Table 13.
MALE
FEMALE
0 20
SECURE FACILITY
Source: Table 13.
Detentions, 2015 Gender by Detention Type
95.8% 2.5% 1.7%
94.6% 2.0% 3.4%
40 60 80 PERCENT
HOMENON-SECURE SUPERVISIONFACILITY
100
In 2015:
zz Regardless of gender, the majority of juveniles detained were held in a secure facility.
zz Females received home supervision more than males (3.4 vs. 2.5 percent).
22
-
Referrals
12
Detentions, 2015 Age Group by Detention Type
95.0% 5.0%
94.1% 2.3% 3.7%
95.6% 1.7% 2.6%
96.9% 1.2% 1.9%
UNDER
12-14
15-17
18-24
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
HOMESECURE NON-SECURE SUPERVISION FACILITY FACILITY
Source: Table 13.
Detentions
In 2015:
zz Over 94 percent of each age group was detained in a secure facility.
Detentions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Detention Type
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
93.5% 3.0% 3.6%
95.8% 1.6% 2.6%
96.8% 1.2% 2.0%
93.9% 1.7% 4.4%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
SECURE HOMENON-SECURE SUPERVISIONFACILITY FACILITY
Source: Table 13.
In 2015:
zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the majority of detained juveniles were in a secure facility.
23
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
24
Probation Department Dispositions
Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 By Type
TRANSFERRED DIVERSION 3.3%6.5%
INFORMAL PROBATION
2.5%
PETITIONS FILEDCLOSED
51.0%AT INTAKE 36.8%
Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported,
direct filed, and transferred.
In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals handled by probation departments:
zz 51.0 percent (44,107) resulted in a petition being filed.
zz 36.8 percent (31,830) were closed at intake.
zz 2.5 percent (2,165) received informal probation.
zz 6.5 percent (5,600) received diversion.
zz 3.3 percent (2,837) were transferred.
Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Disposition Type
MALE 3.2%
FEMALE 3.4%
54.7% 5.5% 2.3%
39.9% 3.1%
9.3%
34.3%
44.2%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED
DIVERSION TRANSFERRED
Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported,
direct filed, and transferred.
In 2015:
zz Males had petitions filed to proceed to juvenile court more than females (54.7 vs. 39.9 percent).
zz More females than males received diversion (9.3 vs. 5.5 percent) or were closed at intake (44.2 vs. 34.3 percent).
-
Referrals
12
Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Disposition Type
UNDER 14.6%
39.0%
51.6%
67.3%
4.1%
3.9%
2.4%
0.7%
69.3%
45.0%
35.9%
27.4%
11.2%
10.2%
0.9%
12-14 1.9%
6.2%15-17 3.9%
2.5% 2.1%
18-24
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED
DIVERSION TRANSFERRED
Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported, direct filed,
and transferred.
Probation Department Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Disposition Type
WHITE 42.8%
52.2%
57.6%
45.8%
2.8%
2.6%
1.9%
2.7%
40.2%
36.3%
33.4%
40.5%
9.3% 4.8%
5.9% 3.0%
HISPANIC
5.0%BLACK 2.1%
6.2% 4.8%
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
INFORMALCLOSEDPETITION PROBATION AT INTAKE FILED
DIVERSION TRANSFERRED
Source: Table 13. Note: Transferred includes the dispositions of traffic court, deported, direct filed,
and transferred.
Probation Department Dispositions
In 2015:
zz More than one-half (51.6 percent) of juveniles in the 1517 age group had petitions filed in juvenile court.
zz The proportion of juveniles having petitions filed increased with age. Conversely, the proportions being closed at intake or receiving informal probation decreased with age.
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of whites received diversion than did any other race/ethnic group (9.3 percent).
zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, close to half of the referrals resulted in a petition being filed.
zz Blacks and Hispanics had a greater percentage of petitions filed (57.6 and 52.2 percent, respectively) than whites and "other" (42.8 and 45.8 percent, respectively).
zz Whites and "other" had a larger percentage of petitions closed at intake (40.2 and 40.5 percent, respectively) than blacks and Hispanics (33.4 and 36.3 percent, respectively).
25
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Direct File-Adult Court
Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Disposition Type
DIRECT FILE INTO
ALL OTHER DISPOSITIONS
99.4%
ADULT COURT 0.6%
Source: Table 16.
In 2015, of the 86,539 referrals handled by probation departments:
zz 0.6 percent (492) resulted in a direct file into adult court.
zz 99.4 percent (86,047) resulted in a disposition other than direct file into adult court.
Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Gender
FEMALE 4.7%
MALE 95.3%
Source: Table 16.
In 2015, of the 492 referrals resulting in a direct file disposition:
zz 95.3 percent (469) were male.
zz 4.7 percent (23) were female.
26
-
Referrals
Source: Table 16.
AGE 16 26.8%AGE 17
50.8%
Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Age Group
AGE 14ALL OTHER 3.0%
AGES AGE 158.7% 10.6%
Direct File-Adult Court
In 2015, of the 492 direct files to adult court:
zz 3.0 percent (15) were 14 years of age.
zz 10.6 percent (52) were 15 years of age.
zz 26.8 percent (132) were 16 years of age.
zz 50.8 percent (250) were 17 years of age.
zz 8.7 percent (43) were other ages.
Direct File-Adult Court, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group
OTHER
HISPANIC 60.8%
BLACK 25.2%
3.7% WHITE 10.4%
Source: Table 16.
In 2015, of the 492 direct files to adult court:
zz 10.4 percent (51) were white.
zz 60.8 percent (299) were Hispanic.
zz 25.2 percent (124) were black.
zz 3.7 percent (18) were from other race/ethnic groups.
27
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
28
-
29
Petitions In the juvenile justice system, a case may be handled informally by the probation department or formally by the juvenile court. If the case proceeds for formal processing, the district attorney files a petition with the juvenile court to initiate court action.
There are two types of petitions filed in juvenile court: new and subsequent. The term new petition applies to a juvenile who is not being supervised by the probation department and is typically a first-time offender. The term subsequent petition applies to a juvenile who is currently being supervised by the probation department and subsequently re-offends.
This section examines petitions by gender, age group, race/ethnic group, offense, fitness hearings, and disposition.
The data used in this section originated from 55 participating county probation departments (Del Norte, Nevada, and Sierra Counties are not included). This information was routed to the DOJ from petitions reported in the Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System (see Appendix 2).
Note: Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Petition Type
Petitions Filed, 2015 By Type
NEW 49.0%
SUBSEQUENT 51.0%
Source: Table 18.
In 2015, of the 44,107 reported petitions filed in juvenile court:
zz 49.0 percent (21,621) were new petitions.
zz 51.0 percent (22,486) were subsequent petitions.
30
-
Petitions
Petition Level
Petitions Filed, 2015 By Level of Offense
FELONY 40.4%
MISDEMEANOR 42.8%
STATUS OFFENSES 16.8%
Source: Table 18.
In 2015, of the 65,701 petitioned offenses filed:
zz 40.4 percent (26,541) were for felonies.
zz 42.8 percent (28,106) were for misdemeanors.
zz 16.8 percent (11,054) were for status offenses.
Note: As many as five offenses can be reported for each petition filed. Consequently, the number of petition offenses is higher than the number of petitions.
31
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Felony Petitions
VIOLENT OFFENSES
30.3%
OTHER OFFENSES
28.3%
PROPERTY OFFENSES
34.3%
Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 By Category
DRUG OFFENSES
7.0%
Source: Table 19.
In 2015, of the 26,541 petitioned felony offenses filed in juvenile court:
zz 30.3 percent (8,048) were for violent offenses.
zz 34.3 percent (9,104) were for property offenses.
zz 7.0 percent (1,867) were for drug offenses.
zz 28.3 percent (7,522) were for other felony offenses.
Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015
MALE
FEMALE
VIOLENT OFFENSES
Source: Table 19.
Gender by Category
0 20 40 60 80 100
29.3% 6.8%33.6%
36.8% 38.6% 16.4% 8.3%
30.2%
PERCENT
PROPERTY DRUG OFFENSESOFFENSES
OTHER OFFENSES
In 2015:
zz Regardless of gender, the largest proportion of felony petitions were filed for property offenses.
32
-
Petitions
12
Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category
UNDER
12-14
15-17
18-24
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
42.3%25.6%
28.6%33.9%
35.1%30.2%
36.1%27.2%
3.5% 34.0%
27.5%
26.4%
7.1%
10.2%
32.1%
DRUGPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES
Source: Table 19.
OTHER OFFENSES
Felony Petitions
33
In 2015:
zz The proportion of petitions filed for felony drug offenses increased with age.
zz The proportion of petitions for other offenses decreased with age.
zz The 12-14 age group had the largest percentage of petitions filed for violent offenses (33.9 percent).
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
Petitions for Felony Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
32.0%26.6%
32.5%27.3%
39.5%39.3%
34.2%30.0%
9.2%
8.2% 32.1%
18.6%
25.2%
2.5%
10.6%
32.2%
DRUG OTHERPROPERTY VIOLENT OFFENSES OFFENSESOFFENSES OFFENSES
Source: Table 19.
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of blacks had petitions filed for felony violent offenses and the least petitions filed for felony drug offenses than any other race/ethnic group.
zz Regardless of race, property offenses comprised the largest percentage of felony petitions.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Misdemeanor Petitions
Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 By Category
ASSAULT AND
BATTERY 33.5%
ALL OTHER 28.4%
THEFT 10.8%DRUG AND
ALCOHOL 13.7%
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13.6%
Source: Table 19.
In 2015, of the 28,106 petitioned misdemeanor offenses filed in juvenile court:
zz 33.5 percent (9,413) were for assault and battery offenses.
zz 10.8 percent (3,043) were for theft offenses.
zz 13.7 percent (3,848) were for drug and alcohol offenses.
zz 13.6 percent (3,825) were for malicious mischief offenses.
zz 28.4 percent (7,977) were for other misdemeanors.
Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Gender by Category
MALE
FEMALE
0
31.4% 10.3% 13.8% 14.9% 29.5%
40.5% 12.5% 13.2% 9.3% 24.5%
20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
ASSAULT AND BATTERY THEFT
DRUG AND ALCOHOL
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
ALL OTHER
Source: Table 19.
In 2015:
zz Males had petitions filed for misdemeanor malicious mischief offenses at a greater percentage than females (14.9 vs. 9.3 percent).
zz Females had petitions filed for misdemeanor assault and battery offenses at a greater percentage than males (40.5 vs. 31.4 percent).
34
-
Petitions
Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Age Group by Category
UNDER
12
12-14
15-17
18-24
36.6% 12.7% 4.2%
26.8%19.7%
40.7% 7.8%
10.5% 15.6% 25.4%
33.4% 10.8% 13.9% 13.3% 28.6%
25.3% 11.5% 19.6% 12.6% 30.9%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY
Source: Table 19.
ALL OTHER
Misdemeanor Petitions
In 2015:
zz The proportions of petitions filed for malicious mischief offenses decreased with age.
zz The proportions of petitions filed for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses increased with age.
Petitions for Misdemeanor Offenses, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Category
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
30.3%
32.6%
42.0%
29.8%
9.2%
11.5%
11.6% 13.2%
15.3%
18.6%
13.9% 14.4%
11.4%
16.3% 13.1%
5.6%
26.2%
25.6%
29.3%
29.9%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
DRUG AND MALICIOUSASSAULT THEFT ALCOHOL MISCHIEFAND BATTERY
Source: Table 19.
OTHER
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of whites had petitions filed for misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses (18.6 percent).
zz A greater percentage of Hispanics had petitions filed for misdemeanor malicious mischief offenses (14.4 percent).
zz A greater percentage of blacks had petitions filed for misdemeanor assault and battery offenses (42.0 percent).
ALL
35
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Status Offense Petitions
Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Category
RUNAWAY CURFEW 0.2%0.2%
TRUANCY INCORRIGIBLE 2.3% 0.1%
OTHER STATUS
OFFENSES 97.2%
Source: Table 19. Note: Other includes minor beyond parental control and failure to obey a juvenile court order.
In 2015, of the 11,054 petitioned status offenses reported:
zz 2.3 percent (251) were for truancy.
zz 0.2 percent (19) were for running away.
zz 0.2 percent (26) were for violating curfew.
zz 0.1 percent (9) were for incorrigibility.
zz 97.2 percent (10,749) were for other status offenses, the majority of which were violations of court orders.
Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Gender
MALE 78.9%
FEMALE 21.1%
Source: Table 24.
In 2015:
zz 78.9 percent (8,719) of petitions for status offenses were male.
zz 21.1 percent (2,335) of petitions for status offenses were female.
36
-
Petitions
Status Offense Petitions
Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Age Group
12-14 9.9%18-24
21.9%
15-17 68.2%
Source: Table 24.
In 2015:
zz Two petitions for status offenses were filed for juveniles under the age of 12.
zz 9.9 percent (1,091) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1214 age group.
zz 68.2 percent (7,536) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1517 age group.
zz 21.9 percent (2,425) of petitions for status offenses were juveniles in the 1824 age group.
Petitions for Status Offenses, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group
OTHER
Source: Table 24.
5.5%
WHITE 19.8%BLACK
19.7%
HISPANIC 55.1%
In 2015:
zz 19.8 percent (2,186) of those petitioned for status offenses were white.
zz 55.1 percent (6,090) of those petitioned for status offenses were Hispanic.
zz 19.7 percent (2,174) of those petitioned for status offenses were black.
zz 5.5 percent (604) of those petitioned for status offenses were from other race/ethnic groups.
37
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Defense Representation
Defense Representation, 2015 By Type
NOT REPRESENTED
1.2%
REPRESENTED 98.8%
6.3%
70.4%22.4%
0.8%
0PRIVATE COURT- PUBLIC 100OTHERCOUNSEL APPOINTED DEFENDER
COUNSEL
Source: Table 20.
In 2015, of the 36,008 known defense representations reported:
zz 98.8 percent (35,576) of the juveniles were represented by counsel.
zz 1.2 percent (432) of the juveniles were not represented by counsel.
Defense Representation, 2015 Gender by Type
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
PRIVATE PUBLICCOURT-APPOINTED OTHERCOUNSEL DEFENDERCOUNSEL
Source: Table 20.
FEMALE
MALE 6.9%
69.3%22.9%
4.2% 20.3%
0.6%74.9%
0.9%
In 2015, of the 35,576 juveniles represented by counsel:
zz Males were represented by private counsel more than females (6.9 vs. 4.2 percent).
zz Females were represented by a public defender more than males (74.9 vs. 69.3 percent).
38
-
Petitions
12
Defense Representation, 2015 Age Group by Type
UNDER
12-14
15-17
18-24
0 20 40 60 80 100PERCENT
20.4% 5.5%
23.2%
20.4% 7.7%
70.0%
73.4% 0.6%
0.9%
0.7%
69.7%
71.2%
25.6% 4.4%
6.2%
PRIVATE PUBLICCOURT-APPOINTED OTHERCOUNSEL DEFENDERCOUNSEL
Source: Table 20.
Defense Representation
In 2015:
zz Regardless of age group, the proportional breakdown of defense representation was similar.
PERCENT
0.4%11.0%
21.3% 5.8%
34.1% 3.1%
14.3%9.9%
15.1% 73.4%
72.5% 0.5%
2.4%
0.7%
60.4%
75.1%
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
PRIVATE COUNSEL
COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL
PUBLIC DEFENDER OTHER
Source: Table 20.
Defense Representation, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type
0 20 40 60 80 100
In 2015:
zz Regardless of race/ethnic group, the majority of juveniles were represented by a public defender.
39
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Fitness Hearings
Fitness Hearings, 2015 By Outcome
UNFITFIT 55.9%44.1%
Source: Table 28.
In 2015, of the 136 fitness hearings reported:
zz 55.9 percent (76) were determined to be unfit for juvenile court and were transferred to adult court for trial.
zz 44.1 percent (60) were determined to be fit and remained in the juvenile system.
Fitness Hearings, 2015 Gender by Outcome
MALE
FEMALE
42.4% 57.6%
100.0%
0 20 40 60 PERCENT
80 100
FIT UNFIT
Source: Table 28.
In 2015:
zz All four females that participated in fitness hearings were found to be fit.
zz 57.6 percent of males were found unfit.
40
-
Petitions
Fitness Hearings, 2015 Age by Outcome
14 66.7% 33.3%
75.0% 25.0%
40.7% 59.3%
38.0% 62.0%
45.8% 54.2%
15
16
17
ALL OTHER
0 20
Source: Table 28.
40 60 80 100 PERCENT
FIT UNFIT
Fitness Hearings
In 2015:
zz Juveniles aged 14 and 15 were found to be fit to remain in the juvenile justice system at a higher percentage than all other age groups.
Fitness Hearings, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Outcome
WHITE 28.6% 71.4%
35.2% 64.8%
62.2% 37.8%
50.0% 50.0%
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
FIT UNFIT
Source: Table 28.
In 2015:
zz A smaller percentage of whites were found to be fit to remain in the juvenile system compared to the percentage of Hispanic and black juveniles (28.6 vs. 35.2 and 62.2 percent, respectively).
41
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Juvenile Court Dispositions
Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 By Type
OTHER
5.5% INFORMAL PROBATION
6.7%
NON-WARD PROBATION
6.7%
WARDSHIP 64.5%
DISMISSED 16.7%
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported,
diversion, and deferred entry of judgment.
In 2015, of the 44,107 juvenile court dispositions:
zz 64.5 percent (28,447) resulted in wardship probation.
zz 16.7 percent (7,359) were dismissed.
zz 6.7 percent (2,940) resulted in informal probation.
zz 5.5 percent (2,404) resulted in non-ward probation.
zz 6.7 percent (2,957) resulted in dispositions including transfer, remand to adult court, deportation, diversion, and deferred entry of judgment.
Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Type
MALE
FEMALE
0 20 40 60 80 100
16.3% 4.9% 6.1%
18.2% 9.0%
65.8%
59.1%
6.9%
7.6% 6.1%
PERCENT
DISMISSED INFORMAL PROBATION NON-WARD PROBATION
WARDSHIP OTHER
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,
and deferred entry of judgment.
In 2015:
zz Males received a wardship disposition more than females (65.8 vs. 59.1 percent).
42
-
Petitions
Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Age Group by Type
UNDER 12
12-14
15-17
18-24
PERCENT
DISMISSED INFORMAL PROBATION NON-WARD PROBATION
WARDSHIP OTHER
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,
and deferred entry of judgment.
0 20 40 60 80 100
40.0% 22.0%
16.6% 12.4%
30.0%
57.0% 7.4% 6.7%
14.2% 5.3% 6.1%
27.4%
67.3%
59.0%
7.1%
4.1% 4.6%
4.9%
7.0% 1.0%
In 2015:
zz Juveniles under the age of 12 received informal probation or had their cases dismissed more than juveniles in any other age group.
zz Juveniles in the 1517 age group received a wardship disposition more than juveniles in any other age group.
Juvenile Court Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
PERCENT
NON-WARD INFORMALDISMISSED PROBATION PROBATION
WARDSHIP OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100
18.4% 7.1%
10.2%
15.7%
55.8%
66.3%
8.5%
5.2% 6.3%
16.9% 4.6% 4.2%
21.2%
68.4%
57.0%
5.9%
6.9% 6.3%
8.5%
6.5%
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes transferred, remanded to adult court, deported, diversion,
and deferred entry of judgment.
Juvenile Court Dispositions
In 2015:
zz Whites received informal probation more than any other race/ethnic group.
zz Hispanics and blacks received a greater percentage of wardships than whites or other race/ethnic groups.
43
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Wardship Probation
Wardship Probation, 2015 By Placement Type
DJJ 0.8%
NON-SECURE COUNTY FACILITY
2.1% SECURE COUNTY FACILITY 30.2%
OTHER 13.7%
HOME 53.3%
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.
In 2015, of the 28,447 wardship probation placements:
zz 53.3 percent (15,175) returned to their own home or a relatives home.
zz 30.2 percent (8,580) were sent to a secure county facility.
zz 2.1 percent (587) were sent to a non-secure facility.
zz 0.8 percent (216) were placed with the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).
zz 13.7 percent (3,889) were sent to "other" facilities.
Wardship Probation, 2015 Gender by Placement Type
MALE
FEMALE
PERCENT
HOME SECURE COUNTY NON-SECURE COUNTY
FACILITY FACILITY
DJJ OTHER
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.
0 20 40 60 80 100
52.7%
1.4%56.1%
2.2% 31.5%
23.9%
12.7%0.9%
18.2%0.3%
In 2015:
zz Males were committed to a secure county facility more than females (31.5 vs. 23.9 percent).
zz Females were returned to their own home or a relatives home more than males (56.1 vs. 52.7 percent).
44
-
Petitions
12
Wardship Probation, 2015
80.0%
59.7%
51.4%
57.9%
0.1% 2.3%
16.7%
24.1% 13.8%
0.7% 2.4%
30.2% 15.3%
1.4% 0.4%
35.0%
3.3%
5.3%
40 60 80 100 PERCENT
NON-SECURE
COUNTY SECURE
COUNTY FACILITY FACILITY
Age Group by Placement Type
UNDER
12-14
15-17
18-24
0 20
HOME
DJJ OTHER
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.
Wardship Probation
In 2015:
zz Juveniles under 12 were returned to their own home or a relatives home more than any other age group.
zz As the juveniles' age increased, so did the percentage of placements in secure county facilities.
zz Regardless of age group, juveniles were least likely placed with the DJJ.
Wardship Probation, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Placement Type
57.5%
51.1%
54.0%
65.3%
0.7% 2.3%
2.1% 26.9%
33.6%
12.9%
12.4%
1.1% 1.3%
25.0% 18.5%
0.9% 3.1%
23.0% 7.8%
0.6% WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
NON-SECURESECUREHOME COUNTY FACILITY FACILITY COUNTY
DJJ OTHER
Source: Table 21. Note: Other includes other public and private facilities.
In 2015:
zz A greater percentage of Hispanics were committed to a secure county facility than any other race/ethnic group.
45
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
46
-
47
Adult Court Dispositions Juveniles can be transferred to the adult justice system for prosecution at the discretion of the district attorney or if they fail a juvenile court fitness hearing. In 2015, probation departments reported 566 transfers to the adult system.
The adult-level disposition information in this section pertains to the 416 final dispositions received in 2015 and examines adult-level dispositions by gender, age, race/ethnic group, offense, and disposition. The data were obtained from the DOJs Offender-Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) file. If a person is arrested for multiple offenses, OBTS selects only the most serious offense based on the severity of possible punishment. If there are multiple court dispositions, OBTS selects the most serious court disposition and the associated offense (see additional data limitations in Appendix 2).
Note: Percentages throughout this section may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Adult Court Dispositions
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Gender
Source: Table 31.
MALE 94.7%
FEMALE 5.3%
In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:
zz 94.7 percent (394) were male.
zz 5.3 percent (22) were female.
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Age
14 YEARS 4.1%
15 YEARS 12.0%
17 YEARS 54.1% 16 YEARS
29.8%
Source: Table 31.
In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:
zz 4.1 percent (17) were 14 years of age at the time of arrest.
zz 12.0 percent (50) were 15 years of age at the time of arrest.
zz 29.8 percent (124) were 16 years of age at the time of arrest.
zz 54.1 percent (225) were 17 years of age at the time of arrest.
48
-
Adult Court Dispositions
Adult Court Dispositions
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Race/Ethnic Group
OTHER 4.6%
WHITE 12.0%
BLACK 25.5%
HISPANIC 57.9%
Source: Table 31.
In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:
zz 12.0 percent (50) were white.
zz 57.9 percent (241) were Hispanic.
zz 25.5 percent (106) were black.
zz 4.6 percent (19) were from other race/ethnic groups.
49
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Adult Court Dispositions
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 By Type of Disposition
CONVICTED 88.0%
CERTIFIED TO JUVENILE
COURT 0.2%
ACQUITTED 0.5%
DISMISSED 11.3%
Source: Table 30.
In 2015, of the 416 adult-level court dispositions received:
zz 88.0 percent (366) resulted in a conviction.
zz 11.3 percent (47) were dismissed.
zz 0.5 percent (2) were acquitted.
zz 0.2 percent (1) were certified to juvenile court.
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Gender by Type of Disposition
0.3% MALE 88.3% 10.9% 0.5%
FEMALE 81.8% 18.2%
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
CONVICTED DISMISSED
CERTIFIED TO ACQUITTEDJUVENILE COURT
Source: Table 30.
In 2015:
zz Regardless of gender, age, and race/ethnicity juveniles in adult court were convicted in the majority of cases.
50
-
Adult Court Dispositions
14.5%
8.4%
12.0%
23.5% 14 76.5%
15 88.0%
16 84.7%
17 90.7%
0
Source: Table 30.
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Age by Type of Disposition
20 40 60 80 PERCENT
CONVICTED DISMISSED
CERTIFIED TO ACQUITTEDJUVENILE COURT
0.8%
0.4%
0.4%
100
Adult Court Dispositions
In 2015:
zz 88.0 percent of juveniles between the ages of 14-17 were convicted.
0 20 40 60 PERCENT
CONVICTED
80
DISMISSED
100
CERTIFIED TO JUVENILE COURT ACQUITTED
Adult Court Dispositions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type of Disposition
WHITE
HISPANIC
BLACK
OTHER
14.0%86.0%
88.8% 10.0%
86.8% 13.2%
89.5% 10.5%
0.4% 0.8%
Source: Table 30.
In 2015:
zz All juveniles sent to adult court had a high percentage of convictions regardless of their race/ethnic group.
51
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
Convictions
Adult Court Convictions, 2015 By Type of Sentence
OTHER JAIL 2.5% 3.8%
ADULT PRISON/
PROBATION
DJJ 59.6%
WITH JAIL 31.1%
PROBATION 3.0%
Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.
In 2015, of the 366 convictions received:
zz 59.6 percent (218) were sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).
zz 3.0 percent (11) received probation.
zz 31.1 percent (114) received probation with jail.
zz 3.8 percent (14) received jail.
zz 2.5 percent (9) received another sentence.
Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Gender by Type of Sentence
MALE 2.6%
FEMALE
0 20 40 60 80 100 PERCENT
ADULT PRISON/DJJ
PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL
JAIL OTHER
Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.
61.5%
72.2%22.2%
2.9% 29.0%
5.6%
4.0%
In 2015:
zz More males than females were sent to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice (61.5 vs. 22.2 percent).
zz Females were sentenced to probation/jail more than males (72.2 vs. 29.0 percent).
52
-
Adult Court Dispositions
17
Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Age by Type of Sentence
14
6.8%15
1.9%16
2.0%
0 20 40 60 80 100
69.2%
59.3% 33.3%
45.5%
64.8% 27.6%
3.4%2.0%
23.1%
2.9%
7.7%
9.1% 31.8%
6.8%
2.9%
PERCENT
ADULT PRISON/DJJ
PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL
JAIL OTHER
Source: Table 30. Note: "Other" includes other and fines.
Convictions
In 2015:
zz Regardless of age, juveniles convicted in adult court were most likely to be sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice.
Note: "Other" includes other and fines.
53
Adult Court Convictions, 2015 Race/Ethnic Group by Type of Sentence
WHITE
1.4%HISPANIC
BLACK
0 20 40 60 80 100
48.8% 4.7%
23.5% 64.7%
34.9%
62.6% 29.4% 5.1%
64.1% 27.2% 2.2%
1.4%
2.2%
5.9% 5.9%
11.6%
4.3%
OTHER
PERCENT
ADULT PRISON/DJJ
PROBATION PROBATION/ JAIL
JAIL OTHER
Source: Table 30.
In 2015:
zz Hispanic and black race/ethnic groups were sentenced to adult prison or the Division of Juvenile Justice more than white and "other" race/ethnic groups.
-
Juvenile Justice in California, 2015
54
-
56
Table 1JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015
Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group by Level of Offense and Law Enforcement Disposition
Level of offense and lawenforcement disposition Total
Gender Male Female Under 12
Age group 12-14 15-17 White
Race/ethnic group Hispanic Black Other
Total 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181
Felony Misdemeanor Status offenses
21,381 41,848 8,694
17,879 28,420 5,394
3,502 13,428 3,300
314 579 91
4,808 10,736 1,915
16,259 30,533 6,688
3,756 10,017 2,156
11,113 22,284
4,982
5,429 6,825 1,180
1,083 2,722
376 Law enforcement disposition 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Referred to probation Counseled and released Turned over to other agency
58,020 12,973
930
42,545 8,469
679
15,475 4,504
251
723 248
13 Percent
13,793 3,419
247
43,504 9,306
670
12,640 3,075
214
31,029 6,867
483
11,102 2,148
184
3,249 883
49
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Felony Misdemeanor
29.7 58.2
34.6 55.0
17.3 66.4
31.9 58.8
27.5 61.5
30.4 57.1
23.6 62.9
29.0 58.1
40.4 50.8
25.9 65.1
Status offenses 12.1 10.4 16.3 9.2 11.0 12.5 13.5 13.0 8.8 9.0 Law enforcement disposition 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Referred to probation Counseled and released
80.7 18.0
82.3 16.4
76.5 22.3
73.5 25.2
79.0 19.6
81.3 17.4
79.4 19.3
80.8 17.9
82.6 16.0
77.7 21.1
Turned over to other agency 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2
Number
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Table 2JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015
Offense Level and Category by Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group
Offense level and category Total Gender
Male Female Under 12 Age group
12-14 15-17 White Race/ethnic group
Hispanic Black OtherNumber
Total... 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Felony
Violent offensesProperty offenses Drug offensesAll other offenses
21,381 7,341 6,685 1,533 5,822
17,879 5,918 5,631 1,334 4,996
3,502 1,423 1,054
199 826
314 89
114 5
106
4,808 1,713 1,397
239 1,459
16,259 5,539 5,174 1,289 4,257
3,756 1,208 1,101
386 1,061
11,113 3,527 3,353
861 3,372
5,429 2,265 1,951
160 1,053
1,083 341 280 126 336
MisdemeanorAssault and batteryTheftDrug and alcoholMalicious mischiefAll other
41,848 9,753 7,733 8,436 5,629
10,297
28,420 6,275 4,205 6,188 4,235 7,517
13,428 3,478 3,528 2,248 1,394 2,780
579 237
93 41
105 103
10,736 3,085 1,851 1,733 1,816 2,251
30,533 6,431 5,789 6,662 3,708 7,943
10,017 2,191 1,729 2,614 1,178 2,305
22,284 4,926 3,858 4,756 3,153 5,591
6,825 2,141 1,531
555 1,031 1,567
2,722 495 615 511 267 834
Status offenses 8,694 5,394 3,300 91 Percent
1,915 6,688 2,156 4,982 1,180 376
Total 100.0 71.9 28.1 1.4 24.3 74.4 22.1 53.4 18.7 5.8 Felony
Violent offenses100.0 100.0
83.6 80.6
16.4 19.4
1.5 1.2
22.5 23.3
76.0 75.5
17.6 16.5
52.0 48.0
25.4 30.9
5.1 4.6
Property offensesDrug offensesAll other offenses
100.0 100.0 100.0
84.2 87.0 85.8
15.8 13.0 14.2
1.7 0.3 1.8
20.9 15.6 25.1
77.4 84.1 73.1
16.5 25.2 18.2
50.2 56.2 57.9
29.2 10.4 18.1
4.2 8.2 5.8
Misdemeanor 100.0 67.9 32.1 1.4 25.7 73.0 23.9 53.2 16.3 6.5 Assault and battery Theft.
100.0 100.0
64.3 54.4
35.7 45.6
2.4 1.2
31.6 23.9
65.9 74.9
22.5 22.4
50.5 49.9
22.0 19.8
5.1 8.0
Drug and alcoholMalicious mischief
100.0 100.0
73.4 75.2
26.6 24.8
0.5 1.9
20.5 32.3
79.0 65.9
31.0 20.9
56.4 56.0
6.6 18.3
6.1 4.7
All other 100.0 73.0 27.0 1.0 21.9 77.1 22.4 54.3 15.2 8.1 Status offenses 100.0 62.0 38.0 1.0 22.0 76.9 24.8 57.3 13.6 4.3
57
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Table 3JUVENILE ARRESTS, 2015
Gender, Age Group, and Race/Ethnic Group by Offense Level and Category
Offense level and category otal GenderMale Female Under 12 Age group
12-14 15-17 White Race/ethnic group
Hispanic Black Other
Total 71,923 51,693 20,230 984 17,459 53,480 15,929 38,379 13,434 4,181 Felony Violent offenses
21,381 7,341
17,879 5,918
3,502 1,423
314 89
4,808 1,713
16,259 5,539
3,756 1,208
11,113 3,527
5,429 2,265
1,083 341
Property offenses Drug offenses All other offenses
6,685 1,533 5,822
5,631 1,334 4,996
1,054 199 826
114 5
106
1,397 239
1,459
5,174 1,289 4,257
1,101 386
1,061
3,353 861
3,372
1,951 160
1,053
280 126 336
Misdemeanor Assault and battery Theft Drug and alcohol Malicious mischief
41,848 9,753 7,733 8,436 5,629
28,420 6,275 4,205 6,188 4,235
13,428 3,478 3,528 2,248 1,394
579 237
93 41
105
10,736 3,085 1,851 1,733 1,816
30,533 6,431 5,789 6,662 3,708
10,017 2,191 1,729 2,614 1,178
22,284 4,926 3,858 4,756 3,153
6,825 2,141 1,531
555 1,031
2,722 495 615 511 267
All other 10,297 7,517 2,780 103 2,251 7,943 2,305 5,591 1,567 834 Status offenses Truancy Runaway Curfew
8,694 1,174 2,998 1,918
5,394 800
1,470 1,300
3,300 374
1,528 618
91 4
39 12
1,915 276 773 309
6,688 894
2,186 1,597
2,156 149 891 487
4,982 860
1,566 1,064
1,180 129 424 222
376 36
117 145
Incorrigible Other status offenses
7671,837
439 1,385
328 452
25 11
Percent
229 328
513 1,498
280 349
361 1,131
112 293
14 64
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Felony Violent offenses
100.0 34.3
100.0 33.1
100.0 40.6
100.0 28.3
100.0 35.6
100.0 34.1
100.0 32.2
100.0 31.7
100.0 41.7
100.0 31.5
Property offenses Drug offenses All other offenses
31.3 7.2
27.2
31.5 7.5
27.9
30.1 5.7
23.6
36.3 1.6
33.8
29.1 5.0
30.3
31.8 7.9
26.2
29.3 10.3 28.2
30.2 7.7
30.3
35.9 2.9
19.4
25.9 11.6 31.0
Misdemeanor 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Assault and battery Theft
23.3 18.5
22.1 14.8
25.9 26.3
40.9 16.1
28.7 17.2
21.1 19.0
21.9 17.3
22.1 17.3
31.4 22.4
18.2 22.6
Drug and alcohol Malicious mischief
20.2 13.5
21.8 14.9
16.7 10.4
7.1 18.1
16.1 16.9
21.8 12.1
26.1 11.8
21.3 14.1
8.1 15.1
18.8 9.8
All other 24.6 26.4 20.7 17.8 21.0 26.0 23.0 25.1 23.0 30.6 Status offenses 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Truancy Runaway Curfew
13.5 34.5 22.1
14.8 27.3 24.1
11.3 46.3 18.7
4.4 42.9 13.2
14.4 40.4 16.1
13.4 32.7 23.9
6.9 41.3 22.6
17.3 31.4 21.4
10.9 35.9 18.8
9.6 31.1 38.6
Incorrigible Other status offenses
8.8 21.1
8.1 25.7
9.9 13.7
27.5 12.1
12.0 17.1
7.7 22.4
13.0 16.2
7.2 22.7
9.5 24.8
3.7 17.0
T Number
58
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
-
Table 4JUVENILE FELONY ARRESTS, 2015
Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition
Category and offense Total Ge
Male
nder
Female Under 12
Age group
12-14 15-17
Number
White
Race/eth
Hispanic
nic group
Black Other
Law enfoReferred to probation
rcement dispoCounseled
and released
sitionTurned
over
Total 21,381 17,879 3,502 314 4,808 16,259 3,756 11,113 5,429 1,083 19,702 1,349 330
Violent offenses 7,341 5,918 1,423 89 1,713 5,539 1,208 3,527 2,265 341 6,868 372 101
Homicide 88 85 3 0 7 81 9 51 25 3 82 6 0 Rape 250 Robbery 2,597 Assault 4,329 Kidnapping 77
242 2,230 3,296
65
8 367
1,033 12
1 13 70 5
70 179 473 2,111
1,144 3,115 19 53
62 228 894 15
120 1,076 2,241
39
56 1,189
974 21
12 104 220
2
235 2,460 4,014
77
13 103 250
0
2 34 65 0
Property offenses 6,685 5,631 1,054 114 1,397 5,174 1,101 3,353 1,951 280 6,167 408 110
Burglary 3,506 Theft 1,426 Motor vehicle theft 1,485 Forgery, checks, access cards 80 Arson 188
3,148 1,114 1,149
58 162
358 312 336 22 26
77 6 8 0
23
795 2,634 251 1,169 246 1,231 16 64 89 76
547 218 241 28 67
1,659 740 839 30 85
1,173 393 343 21 21
127 75 62 1
15
3,261 1,303 1,377
70 156
166 107 96 9
30
79 16 12 1 2
Drug offenses 1,533 1,334 199 5 239 1,289 386 861 160 126 1,354 158 21
Narcotics 279 246 33 1 41 237 90 140 30 19 253 21 5 Marijuana 879 Dangerous drugs 351 Other drug violations 24
788 284 16
91 67 8
3 0 1
161 715 35 316 2 21
204 86 6
493 211 17
100 29 1
82 25 0
753 326 22
111 24 2
15 1 0
All other offenses 5,822 4,996 826 106 1,459 4,257 1,061 3,372 1,053 336 5,313 411 98
Manslaughter-vehicle 1 Lewd or lascivious 370
0 352
1 18
0 16
0 1 162 192
0 93
1 206
0 57
0 14
1 347
0 18
0 5
Other sex 296 224 72 5 104 187 76 159 40 21 258 27 11 Weapons 2,173 Driving under the influence 29
1,955 25
218 4
37 0
553 1,583 0 29
323 8
1,374 18
370 0
106 3
1,930 26
215 1
28 2
Hit-and-run 36 32 4 0 1 35 6 22 6 2 35 0 1 Escape 13 Bookmaking 0 Other felonies 2,904
9 0
2,399
4 0
505
0 0
48
3 10 0 0
636 2,220
3 0
552
8 0
1,584
2 0
578
0 0
190
12 0
2,704
0 0
150
1 0
50
59
(continued)
-
Table 4 - continued JUVENILE FELONY ARRESTS, 2015
Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition Gender Age group Race/ethnic group Law enforcement disposition
Category and offense TotalMale Female Under 12 12-14 15-17 White Hispanic Black Other Referred to probation
Counseledand released
Turnedover
Percent Total 100.0 83.6 16.4 1.5 22.5 76.0 17.6 52.0 25.4 5.1 92.1 6.3 1.5
Violent offenses 100.0 80.6 19.4 1.2 23.3 75.5 16.5 48.0 30.9 4.6 93.6 5.1 1.4
Homicide 100.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 8.0 92.0 10.2 58.0 28.4 3.4 93.2 6.8 0.0 Rape 100.0 96.8 3.2 0.4 28.0 71.6 24.8 48.0 22.4 4.8 94.0 5.2 0.8 Robbery 100.0 85.9 14.1 0.5 18.2 81.3 8.8 41.4 45.8 4.0 94.7 4.0 1.3 Assault 100.0 76.1 23.9 1.6 26.4 72.0 20.7 51.8 22.5 5.1 92.7 5.8 1.5 Kidnapping 100.0 84.4 15.6 6.5 24.7 68.8 19.5 50.6 27.3 2.6 100.0 0.0 0.0
Property offenses 100.0 84.2 15.8 1.7 20.9 77.4 16.5 50.2 29.2 4.2 92.3 6.1 1.6
Burglary 100.0 89.8 10.2 2.2 22.7 75.1 15.6 47.3 33.5 3.6 93.0 4.7 2.3 Theft 100.0 78.1 21.9 0.4 17.6 82.0 15.3 51.9 27.6 5.3 91.4 7.5 1.1 Motor vehicle theft 100.0 77.4 22.6 0.5 16.6 82.9 16.2 56.5 23.1 4.2 92.7 6.5 0.8 Forgery, checks, access cards 100.0 72.5 27.5 0.0 20.0 80.0 35.0 37.5 26.3 1.3 87.5 11.3 1.3 Arson 100.0 86.2 13.8 12.2 47.3 40.4 35.6 45.2 11.2 8.0 83.0 16.0 1.1
Drug offenses 100.0 87.0 13.0 0.3 15.6 84.1 25.2 56.2 10.4 8.2 88.3 10.3 1.4
Narcotics 100.0 88.2 11.8 0.4 14.7 84.9 32.3 50.2 10.8 6.8 90.7 7.5 1.8 Marijuana 100.0 89.6 10.4 0.3 18.3 81.3 23.2 56.1 11.4 9.3 85.7 12.6 1.7 Dangerous drugs 100.0 80.9 19.1 0.0 10.0 90.0 24.5 60.1 8.3 7.1 92.9 6.8 0.3 Other drug violations 100.0 66.7 33.3 4.2 8.3 87.5 25.0 70.8 4.2 0.0 91.7 8.3 0.0
All other offenses 100.0 85.8 14.2 1.8 25.1 73.1 18.2 57.9 18.1 5.8 91.3 7.1 1.7
Manslaughter-vehicle 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Lewd or lascivious 100.0 95.1 4.9 4.3 43.8 51.9 25.1 55.7 15.4 3.8 93.8 4.9 1.4 Other sex 100.0 75.7 24.3 1.7 35.1 63.2 25.7 53.7 13.5 7.1 87.2 9.1 3.7 Weapons 100.0 90.0 10.0 1.7 25.4 72.8 14.9 63.2 17.0 4.9 88.8 9.9 1.3 Driving under the influence 100.0 86.2 13.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 27.6 62.1 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.4 6.9
Hit-and-run 100.0 88.9 11.1 0.0 2.8 97.2 16.7 61.1 16.7 5.6 97.2 0.0 2.8 Escape 100.0 69.2 30.8 0.0 23.1 76.9 23.1 61.5 15.4 0.0 92.3 0.0 7.7 Bookmaking 100.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - Other felonies 100.0 82.6 17.4 1.7 21.9 76.4 19.0 54.5 19.9 6.5 93.1 5.2 1.7
60
Notes: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Dash indicates that a percent change/percent was not calculated.
-
Table 5JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS, 2015
Category and Offense by Gender, Age Group, Race/Ethnic Group, and Law Enforcement Disposition
Category and offense TotalGender
Male Female Under 12
Age group
12-14 15-17
Number
White
Race/ethnic group
Hispanic Black Other
Law enfoReferred to probation
rcement dispositionCounseled
and releasedTurned
over
Total 41,848 28,420 13,428 579 10,736 30,533 10,017 22,284 6,825 2,722 33,226 8,094 528
Assault and battery 9,753 6,275 3,478 237 3,085 6,431 2,191 4,926 2,141 495 8,225 1,388 140
Theft 7,733 4,205 3,528 93 1,851 5,789 1,729 3,858 1,531 615 5,829 1,793 111 Petty theft...Other theft
7,265 468
3,837 368
3,428 100
89 4
1,725 5,451 126 338
1,617 112
3,634 224
1,425 106
589 26
5,439 390
1,723 70
103 8
Drug and alcohol 8,436 6,188 2,248 41 1,733 6,662 2,614 4,756 555 511 6,671 1,678 87 MarijuanaOther drugsDrunkLiquor lawsDriving under the influence
3,378 1,801 1,110 1,659
488
2,580 1,304
792 1,132
380
798 497 318 527 108
37 2 0 1 1
1,056 2,285 252 1,547 198 912 222 1,436
5 482
948 543 337 617 169
1,927 1,040
666 856 267
311 104 47 80 13
192 114 60
106 39
2,571 1,531
853 1,294
422
782 246 240 353 57
25 24 17 12 9
Malicious mischief. 5,629 4,235 1,394 105 1,816 3,708 1,178 3,153 1,031 267 4,374 1,196 59 Disorderly conductDisturbing the peaceVandalismMalicious mischief.
1251,927 2,245
89
104 1,187 1,898
81
21 740 347
8
1 31 48 1
24 100 790 1,106 687 1,510 16 72
48 318 515 24
49 1,032 1,328
35
26 474 312 24
2 103 90 6
97 1,412 1,870
68
28 506 348 20
0 9
27 1
Trespassing 1,243 965 278 24 299 920 273 709 195 66 927 294 22
All other offenses 10,297 7,517 2,780 103 2,251 7,943 2,305 5,591 1,567 834 8,127 2,039 131 Manslaughter - misd. BurglaryChecks and access cards
42,059
46
3 1,125
36
1 934 10
0 22 1
0 4 435 1,602 20 25
1 433 13
2 1,097
15
0 349 16