PDE1 Lecture 16-25

download PDE1 Lecture 16-25

of 25

Transcript of PDE1 Lecture 16-25

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    1/25

    Notes By Ibrahim Al Balushi

    Lecture 16

    Dirichlet Problem for Poisson eq.u= f in

    u= g on (1)

    If v= f, then w = u v satisfiesw= 0 in

    w= g v on

    We needu

    C2()

    C0(). Our candidate

    u(x) =

    E(x y)f(y)dy

    But f C() is not sufficient; u / C1() s.t u C(). This leads to the notion of Holdercontinuous spaces. In particular, we will show that the integrability and boundedness off can onlyguarantee a function uC1 in the integral expression above. It will be established that a necessarycondition for u C2 which solves u = f is that f must not only be continuous, but also Holdercontinuous. The uniqueness will of u, should it exist, will also depend on the boundary of , asdescribed in the discussion above.

    Definition 1. Letf : R, y, 0<

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    2/25

    Newtonian Potential

    Definition 2. For any integrablefon domain we define the Newtonian potential offas a functionw defined by

    w(x) =

    E(x y)f(y)dy, (5)

    whereE(x y) defines the fundamental solution for the Laplacian.Suppose f is defined to be the right hand side of the Laplace equation, then w(x) would define

    the solution for u= f, ie w := u. By this definition, we may deduce information and estimates onderivatives ofu by studying the behaviour of integral (5). These estimates will form basis for Schauderestimates and the extension of potential theory from the Laplace equation to general linear ellipticPDEs.

    Theorem 1. Letfbe bounded and integrable in, and letw be the Newtonian potential off. Then

    wC1

    () and for anyx,iw(x) =

    iE(x y)f(y)dy, i= 1,...,n. (6)

    Proof. Choose such thatC(R), 0, = 0on [0, 1] = 1on [2, ) and define(t) =

    t

    ,

    for some >0,

    w(x) =

    E(x y)(|x y|)f(y)dy (7)

    is clearly in C1(). now,

    |w(x)

    w(x)

    |=

    E(x

    y)[(

    |x

    y

    |)

    1]f(y)dy (8)

    f

    |E(x y)||(|x y|) 1|dy (9)

    (10)

    note that (|x y|) 1 = (1|x y|) 1 = 0 whenever|x y| 2 so we have

    =f

    |xy|2

    |E(x y)|dy

    by change of variables|x y|= r we have

    =f20

    Crn2

    rn1drC2f

    Henceww uniformly in . ConstantCis a result of higher dimensional polar integration;

    d, being change of variables Jacobian determinant. Now let

    v(x) =

    iE(x y)f(y)dy (11)

    2

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    3/25

    We aim to assert the final statement. Naively, one may immediately attempt to employ Liebnezrule by differentiating under the integral, however E(x

    y) is not continuous nor bounded whenever

    x y= 0. This is essentially why we make use of(t) where we cut out that region for some >0.This then allows us to invoke Liebnez rule and showing that the result holds at the limits.

    |iw(x) vi(x)|= xi

    E(x y)(|x y|)f(y)dy

    E(x y)xi

    f(y)dy

    (12)=

    E(x y)xi

    (|x y|)f(y)dy+

    E(x y) (|x y|)xi

    xi yi|x y| f(y)dy (13)

    E(x y)xi

    f(y)dy

    (14)

    =

    Eyxi

    [ 1]f(y)dy+

    Eyi(|x y|) xi yi|x y| f(y)dy (15)

    Cf20

    rn1

    rn1dr+

    2

    Eyxi yi|x y| f(y)dy (16)

    = iwvi uniformly

    A stronger result occurs should fbe Holder continuous on as well. In particular, the Newtonianpotential becomesC2 instead ofC1 by the conditions above.

    Theorem 2. Letf be bounded and locally Holder continuous with

    [0, 1] in, and letw be the

    Newtonian potential off. ThenwC2(), w= f in, and for anyx

    ij w(x) =

    ij E(x y)(f(y) f(x))dy f(x)

    iE(x y)j (y) dSy, i, j = 1,...,n. (17)

    where for which the divergence theorem holds andfis extended to vanish outsideProof. The proof of regularity is similar to the previous theorem, however the crucial step is when weuse Holder continuity. Define the RHS of (17) by (x) and set v = iw so for >0 define

    v(x) =

    iE(x y)(|x y|)f(y)dy (18)

    We can write the difference

    |(x) j v(x)|=

    |xy|2

    xj

    [1 (|x y|)]

    xiE(x y)

    (f(y) f(x))dy

    (19)Holder continuity implies|f(x) f(y)| [f];x|x y| (20)

    [f];x

    |xy|2

    xj

    [1 (|x y|)]

    xiE(x y)

    |x y|dy (21)

    3

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    4/25

    To assert the solvability of w= fwe will set =BR(x) whereR is sufficiently large in (17) wehave

    w=

    i

    BR(x)

    2i E(x y)(f(y) f(x))dy f(x)

    BR(x)

    iE(x y)i dSy (22)

    =

    BR(x)/B(x)

    E(x y) =0

    [f(y) f(x)] (23)

    +

    B(x)0

    as 0

    i

    2i E(x y)[f(y) f(x)] f(x)

    BR(x)

    Ey dSy (24)

    =

    f(x)

    BR(x)

    Ey (25)

    taking i=xi yi|x y| we have, (26)

    = f(x)

    |Sn1|Rn1

    |xy|=R

    dSy (27)

    =f(x) (28)

    Lemma 1. uC1(Rn) ifC() L(). Moreover,uC1 Cf.Proof.

    uuiuvi

    u(x + hei) u(x) = u(x + hei) u(x) + o(1) (29)=hiu(x + h

    ei) + o(1) (30)

    =hvi(x + hei) + ho(1) + o(1) (31)

    =hvi(x) + ho(1) + o(1) (32)

    (33)

    vi,(x) =

    iE(x y)(|x y|) N

    f(y)dy

    4

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    5/25

    vi,vi uniformly.

    ivi(x) =B

    iN(f(y) f(x))dy+ f(x) B

    iN dy F =N eidivF = Nyi

    =Nxj

    (34)

    =

    B

    [f(y) f(x)]iN+ f(x)

    B

    N

    (35)

    for B large enough (36)

    =

    B

    [f(y) f(x)]iN f(x)

    B

    vj diE (37)

    vij (x) =

    B

    dj diE(x y)[f(y) f(x)]dy

    B

    f(x)j iE(x y)dyn1

    ivi, vij (x) w

    =

    B

    [f(y) f(x)] j [((|x y|) 1)iE(x y)] A

    dy

    A= xi yi|x y|

    |A| Crn1

    + C

    r2

    suppose|f(y) f(x)| w(|x y|)

    |D| 20

    Cw(r)rn1dr

    rn1 +

    20

    Cw(r)rn1

    rn dr

    Cw(r)dr

    +

    Cw(r)

    r dr0as0.

    Definition 3. f C() is called Dini continuous ifK compact,w: Ro Ro integrable s.t|f(x) f(y)| w(|x y|) x, yK

    and thatR >0, R0 w(r)r1dr

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    6/25

    Iffis Dini in , then

    j iu(x) =B

    [f(y) f(x)]K(x y)dy f(x) B

    j iE(x y)dn1y

    B, K= j iE, extendfby 0 outside of . uC2()Theorem 4. Iffis Dini in, thenuC2()C1(Rn)andu= f in. In addition, iff C0,(B)andB, then

    uC2 CfC(B).Proof. We have

    u(x) =

    i

    iiu(x) (38)

    = BR(x)

    ( )i

    iiE(x y) =0

    dy f(x) BR(x)

    i

    iiE(x y)dn1y (39)

    iE(x y) = 1|Sn1|xi yi|x y|n =

    i|Sn1||x y|n1

    wherei= xiyi|xy|

    I2 =

    |xy|=R

    dn1

    |Sn1||x y|n1 =|Sn1|Rn1|Sn1|Rn1 = 1 = u(x) = f(x)

    bound for : |j iu(x)| B

    [f],x|x y||x y|ndy+ |f(x)|C

    [f],x:= supyB|f(x)f(y)||xy| and|f|C(B) = supxB [f],xwe have

    fC(B)=fC(B)+ |f|C(B)

    Theorem 5. bounded, regular everywhere, f C() Dini in , g C(). Then!uC2() C() s.t

    u= f in

    u= g on

    Proof.

    v(x) =

    E(x y)f(y)dy = vC2() C1(Rn)

    . Then solve w= 0 in

    w= g v on

    6

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    7/25

    = u= v+ wC2() C()u= v+ w= f in

    u= v+ (g v) = g on

    Second Order Elliptic Equations

    Lu=

    ij

    aijij u +

    j

    bj j u + b0u

    aij , bkC(). A= (aij) is Symmetric Positive definite : 1||2 TAn||2 where Rnand1 andn positive constants. Uniformly elliptic.

    Given the conditions above, at each x0,QO(n) s.tQA(x0)Q

    T = diagonal

    = diag(1,...,n), i> 0.

    Method of Continuity

    Theorem 6. X, YBanach spaces, A0, A1: XY bounded linear operators, At = (1 t)A0+ tA1 :X Y. AssumeC >0 s.t

    uX CAtuY uXA0 is surjective = A1 surjective.Proof. Injectivity implies Atu = Atv = uvX 0 = u = v, At injective. Assume Atsurjective. Lets[0, 1]. Asu= f given some arbitrary f Y. We want to use Banach fixed pointtheorem. That is, construct mapping : XX s.t u = u.

    Atu= f Asu + Atu= f+ (t s)(A1 A0)u

    u= A1t f+ (t s)A1t (A1 A0)u=: u

    (u v)X =(t s)A1t (A1 A0)(u v)X (40) |t s|A1t A 1 A0

    want

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    8/25

    Schauder Estimates

    We will use method of continuity with X=C2,o (), Y =C

    0,

    ().Lu= f in

    u= 0 on

    idea: Localization, freezing coefficients, estimate the error (L A0)u, partition of unity :Bi. iC, 1]),

    i

    i = 1in

    LA0 = A(x0) from var to constant coeff. We now estimate

    uX =iiuX i

    iuX CiA(xi)iuY

    C

    i

    LiuY + C

    [A(xi) A]iuY + BiuY

    C

    i

    iLuY CLuY

    +(Li iL)uY + [A(xi) A]iuY + BiuY

    Lecture 18

    Motivation from Last time

    L=

    ijaij ij+

    ibij+ b0

    Assumeaij , bkC(). > 0 s.t TTA, Rn. Aiming foruC2,C[(1 t) + tL]uC

    (continuity of operators)

    At = (1 t)I+ tA = TAt(1 t)T+ tTmin(1, )T.sufficient is to show

    uC2,CLuCwith C mildly dependence on L. Recall

    u(x) = E(x y)f(y)dy, f C(B), Bij u(x) =

    [f(y) f(x)]ij E(x y)dy f(x)

    B

    j iE(x y)dn1y

    anduC() C1(Rn), u= f in ,uC2()CfC(B)

    ij u(x) iju(x) = f(x)

    B

    j i[E(x y) E(x y)] + [f(x) f(x)]

    B

    iiE(x y)+

    8

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    9/25

    consider the midpoint betweenx and x and take ball =|x x| x = x+x2

    +

    B(x)

    [f(y) f(x)]K(x y)dy+ (xx)

    ij E(x y) =: K(x y)

    +[f(x) f(x)]

    B/B(x)

    K(x y)dy+

    B/B(x)

    [f(y) f(x)][K(x y) K(x y)]dy

    =BR(z), B= B2R(z)

    we find bounds

    |I1| |x x|

    B

    |iE(x y)|dn1y|x x

    Rn |B |

    where R is the distance between and B whereB

    and y

    B

    C|x x|

    R C

    |I2| C,

    |I3|

    B(x)

    [f]x,|x y|n

    ify was outside ball then|y x| C|y x|

    C[f]x,

    B3/2(x)

    |x y|n

    C[f]x,

    |I4| C[f]x,

    |I5| C+ |

    B(x)

    jiE(x y) C1n

    dn1y| C

    |I6| [f]x, |y x||x x||K( y)|dy

    [f]x,|x x|

    B/B(x)

    |y x|| y|n+1 dy

    C[f]x,|x x| |y x|n1dy

    C[f]x,

    rn1rn1dr

    C[f]x,1

    so|ij u(x) iju(x)| C(|f(x)| + [f]x, + [f]x,)

    = |u|C2,()CfC(B)

    9

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    10/25

    up to boundary

    Half annuluis on upper half space.R

    n+={xRn|xn> 0}

    B+r =BrRn+B1 = BR, B2= B2R

    =B2{xn= 0}xB+1

    ij u(x) =

    B+2

    [f(y) f(x)]K(x y)dy f(x)

    B+2

    j iE(x y)dn1y

    j has nonzero comp upwards on sigma so

    j

    =n : ...= 0

    same as the interior case.

    i=n : by symetry

    j i=

    ij

    i= j = n : u= f = 2nu= fn1i=1

    2i u

    |2nu|C(B+1 ) |f|C(B+1 ) +n1i=1

    |2i u|C(B+1 )

    CfC(B+2 ) = |u|C2,(B+1 )CfC(B+2 )Theorem 7. u

    C2(B2)

    C(B2), f

    C(B2), u= f in B2

    = uC2,(B1) anduC2,(B1)C(uC(B2)+ fC(B2))Proof.

    w= E f = w= f inB2, v= u w = v= 0 in B2.w2,C (B1)CfC(B2)

    vC2,(B1)CvC(B2)CuC(B2)+ CwC(B2)whichCwC(B2)CfC(B2)Lemma 2.

    XYZ,Banach spaces that are contiuously embedded :

    uYC1uX uZC2uYwithXcompactly embbded inY:

    {uX|uX1} is compact in Y= > 0, C()0st

    uYuX+ C()uZ uX

    10

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    11/25

    Lecture 19

    Last time

    Theorem 8. uC2(B2) C(B2), f C(B2), u= f in B2; Bi := BiR= uC2,(B1),uC2,(B1)C(uC(B2)+ fC(B2))

    whereCdepends onR.

    |u|C2,(BR)C(R2uC(B2R)+ RfC(B2B)+ fC(B2R))Analogy: dimensional transformation

    x= Rx R = u(x) = u(Rx)

    |u|C() = sup

    =|u(Rx) u(Ry)|

    |x y| = sup|u(x) u(y)|

    R|x y| =R+|u|C()

    |u|C2,(BR)= R2|u|C2,(B1)Const R2(uC(B2)+ R2fC(B2)+ R2|f|C(B2))=R2(uC(B2R)+ R2fC(B2R)+ R2+|f|C(B2R))

    Observation:x= (x)coord transformation

    |x y| .|(x) (y)| .|x y| = |u|C() |u|C()XY = X Y X

    We provied for upper half annulus thatu = E fuC2,(B+1 ) fC(B+2 )

    Theorem 9. uC2(B+2) C(B+2 ), f C(B+2 ), u= f in B+2, u= 0 on

    = uC2,(B+1 ) anduC2,(B+1 ) uC(B+2 ) + fC(B+2 )Proof.

    w(x) =

    B+2

    E(xy)f(y)dy

    B+2

    E(xy)f(y)dy y reflection about (base of upper half annulus)

    = w= f in B+1 , w= 0 on v= u w = v= 0 in B+1, v= 0on .

    vC2,(B+1 ) vC(B2) uC(B2) conu

    C(B+2 )

    +wC(B2)

    take f(y) = f(y) for yB2 f (y) = f(y)yB+2

    11

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    12/25

    w(x) = 2

    B+2E(x y)f(y)dy

    B2E(x y)f(y)dy

    fC(B2) fC(B+2 ) , fC(B2) fC(B+2 )

    |f(x) f(y)||x y|

    |f(y) f(x)||x y| for x,yB

    +2

    |f(x) f(y)||x y| xB

    +2 , yB2

    Lemma 3. X compactly embedded in Y continuously embedded in Z Banach

    > 0,C()> 0 s.tuYuX+ C()uZ uCProof. Let >0 be given.{un} X, unX = 1, stunY > + nuZ nN

    unu in Y,unZ< 1n

    uY0 = u unZCu unY0 = u= 0 but

    uY unY u unY > u unY contradiction.

    |uv(x)uv(y)| |u(x)v(x)u(y)v(y)|+|u(y)v(x)u(y)v(y)| |u|C |xy||v(x)|+|u(y)||v|C |xy|

    = |uv|C |u|C |v|C0 + |u|C0 |v|C

    Global Schauder Estimates

    L=

    aijij+

    bii+ bi, aij , bkC().

    A + BLety interior. Ay =

    aij (y)ij . r >0 is such that B2r

    uC2,(B1) r2uC(B2)+ rAyuC(b2)+ |Ayu|C(B2)AyuC(B2) LuC(B2)+ (Ay A)uC(B2)+ BuC(B2)

    BuC biuC bCuC1(Ay A)uC(B2) (aij (y) aij )2uC(B2) aijCuC2(B2)

    aij (y) aij ) raijC|Ayu|C(B2) LuC(B2)+ (Ay A)uC+ BuC

    Bu

    C

    bk

    C

    u

    C1,

    (Ay A)uC aij(y) aijCuC2+ aij (y) aijCuC2, uC2+ ruC2,(B2)choose r small enough, uC2,0 (B1) =

    uC2, LuC+ uC2uC2uC2,+ C()uC0

    12

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    13/25

    Lecture 20

    Last time

    L=

    aijij+

    bii+ b0 aij , bkC()Theorem 10. yr >0 small such that

    uC2,o (Br(y)) LuCBr(y)+ uC2(Br(y))

    for alluC2,o (B+1).Lemma 4.

    uC2,(B+1 ) uC(B+2 ) + uC(B+2 )

    uC2,

    (B+2 ) C(B

    +2), u= 0 on. : upper hald annuli with base

    Definition 4. we say Ck, isu Uy nbhd of y and : Uy B1 s.t C2,(Uy),1 :B1Uy, 1 C2,(B1) and(Uy ) = B+1 , (Uy ) = B 1+\B1.Theorem 11. C2,, yUnbhd ofy such that

    uC2,(U+) LuC(U+)+ uC2(U+)

    U+ =U uC2,0 (U), u= 0 onU Proof. By definition,: UyB1; Ur = 1(Br) (r 0 sufficnetly small

    uC2,(U+r ) LuC(U+r )+ uC2(U+r )

    Theorem 12 (Shauder 1934). Rn bdd domain, C2,,C >0 s.t

    uC2,()C(LuC()+ uC()) uC2,() u= 0 on

    Proof.y let Uy be nbhd of y s.t local estimates holds{Uy} open cover of . choose a finitesubcover

    {Ui

    }. we have

    {i

    }(partion of unitiy ) subordinate to

    {Ui

    }i : R

    n [0, 1] iCo (Ui)

    i on

    U+i =Ui

    uC2,() =

    iuC2,()

    iuC2,(U+i )+ iuC2(U+i )

    (LuC(U+i )+ u2C(U

    +i ))

    i

    (LuC()+ uC2()) LuC()+ uC2()

    13

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    14/25

    iuC2(U+i ) uC2(U+i )

    Liu= iLu + (Li iL)u (firstorder)LuC iLuC+ uC1, LuC

    = uC2,()C(LuC()+ uC2())uC2,()uC2,+ C()uC

    for method of continuity we needuC2, LuC .In general the extra term +uCis unavoid-able because for example

    u + ku = 0

    u= 0

    has non trivial solution.Maximum principal:

    b0 Lu0 in uC2() C()= sup

    usup

    u

    Proof. Lu > 0 in . y s.tu(y) = sup u hence Lu0(u0). Define u = u + ex

    Corollary 1. b00 Lu0 = umax{0, sup u}Proof. + ={x :u(x)> 0}

    Lou= aij iju +

    biiu b0u0

    in +

    = sup+

    usup+

    umax{0, sup

    u}

    Corollary 2. b00, Lu= f = |u| sup |u| + Cf.Proof. Choose >0 such that

    L0ex1

    a11ex1+bex1

    ex1

    for some >0. Let

    v(x) = sup |

    u

    |+

    ed ex1

    f

    LvL0u fL(u + v)f f0 u + v0 on

    L(u + v) f f0 u + v0 on = |u| v = sup |u| + Cf.

    Ifb00 :uC2,() LuC()

    14

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    15/25

    Theorem 13 (Shauder). b00 C2, f C(). Then there exists uniqueuC2() C()such that Lu= f in

    u= 0 on

    moreover,uC2,()anduC() fC()Proof.

    X={uC2,()| u = 0 on }yC()

    Lecture 21

    L=

    aij ij +

    bii+ b0

    where{aij}ij symmetric positive matrix.Theorem 14 (Schauder Regularity Thm). Letaij , bkC(), C2,, f C(), b00.

    = !uC2() C() s.tLu= f in

    u= 0 on

    In addition,u2,; f;Implicitly assume:

    Theorem 15 (kellogg). C2,, f C(), uC2() C()satisfiesu= f in

    u= 0 on

    = uC2,()sketch. Strategy:- first prove for balls then apply Schauder regularity theorem for balls.

    Inhomogeneous Dirichlet Boundary Condition

    Definition 5. We sayg

    C2,() if

    v

    C2,() s.t

    v| = g and g2,,:={v2,;: v|= g} (43)

    Corollary 3. fC(), gC2,() = !uC2() C() s.tLu= f in

    u= g on and u2,; f;+ g2,;

    15

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    16/25

    Proof. LetvC2,()s.t v| = g, v2,2g2,Lw= f Lv in

    w= 0 on and w2, f+ v2,

    u= v + wu2, v2,+ w2,

    Meaning:F(u) = (Lu,u|), F :C2,()C() C2,()

    F1 1

    Elliptic Estimates in Holder Spaces

    Ck+2,, aij , bkCk,, =uk+2, Luk,+ uk

    Proof. ForL = , k= 1

    u2, u+ uC u1,+ u1

    Elliptic Regularity in Holder spaces

    Ck+2,, aij , bk, f

    Ck,, g

    Ck+2,(), u

    C2()

    C()

    Lu= f in

    u= g on = uCk+2().

    Proof. ForL = + Id, k= 1 : ifv = iuC2, it should satisfyv= if iu v= ig on

    (44)

    solving for v , we get vC2,(). Lethu be finite difference approximation ofiu

    hu(x) =u(x + hei) u(x)

    h

    hu= hf hu (45)Subtract (45) from (44)

    (v hu) = if hf+ hu iu in v ku= ig hu on

    v hu if hf+ ig hu0.

    16

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    17/25

    Meaning: solution is as regular as the data allows. In particular, if everything is smooth, thensolution is smooth. E.g Lu u= 0 in

    u= 0 on

    andL is C, C = uC.

    Interior Regularity

    aij, bk, fCk,, uC2. Lu= f in B3r = uCk+2,(Br).Proof.

    v= if iu in B2rv= iu on B2,r

    = vC3,(Br).

    hu= hf hu in B2r= u hu if hf+ iu hu+ iu huC().

    Case b0 > 0: In general, L is not invertible with homogeneous B.C, but L Id is invertible forsufficiently large 0 > 0. = (L Id)1 is called the Resolvent ofL. When it exists,

    : C()C2,()C()

    so : C C is compact.

    (L )u= f uu = f u(Id )u= f

    Lecture 22

    F =I d + k is Fredholm ie. k= dimker(F) 0 such that

    XX C(AxY + XY) xX.

    = dimkernelA

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    18/25

    Spectral Theorem for Compact Operators

    X infinite dimensional Banach space, K: XXcompact.{k} Cs.t k0 (0 = 0) s.t:(Id K)1 bounded if=k for all k .

    1dimKer(Id k) 0}u= g on Rn

    Heat kernel:E(x, t) = (t)(4t)n/2e|x|/4t

    EC(Rn R+). Equation is invariant under transformation:t2tx

    t

    u(x, t) = (|x|2/t)find radial solution for ODE to find kernel.

    Definition 6.

    (etg)(x) :=

    Rn

    E(x y, t)g(y)dny

    Heat propagator.

    18

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    19/25

    Theorem 18. gCb(Rn), defineu : Rn R+ R by heat propagator

    u(x, t) = (etg)(x)

    thenuC(Rn R+) andtu= u inRn R+. Moreover,

    etgg locally uniformly as t0 and

    u gProof.

    tE= E in Rn R+

    We use the fact that

    E(x, t) = 1, E0E(x, t)

    0 as t

    0 if x

    = 0

    let

    z =x y

    2

    t= y = x 2tz

    dny= (2

    t)ndnz

    u(x, t) = (4t)n/2

    e|z|2

    g(x 2

    tz)(2

    t)ndnz

    n/2g

    e|z|2

    dz =g

    tu= u, E(x, t) = (t)(4t)n/2exp(|x|

    2

    4t )

    (t) =

    1 t > 0

    0 t < 0

    u(x, t) = [etg](x) =

    Rn

    E(x y, t)g(y)dy

    Theorem 19. IfgCb(Rn), thenuC(Rn R+) andtu= u inRn R+etgg as t0,u g

    Some notes on the hear propagator operator:

    g u : Cb(Rn) Cb(Rn R+) is bounded. One needs|g(x)| C e|x|2 to ensure integrabilityunder the heat proagator defined above. The formula is useless for t < 0. Moreover, the heatpropagator has a smoothing effect; irreversible effect. Disturbances propagate atspeed.

    19

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    20/25

    Duhamels Principal

    Ifut = Lu, u|t=0 = g is solved by u(t) = S(t)g, then ut Lu= f, u|t=0 = 0 is solved byu(t) =

    t0

    S(t s)f(s) ds. (46)

    otherwise known as Duhamels formula (DF).

    We knowRn

    E(x y, t)g(y)dy solves ut = u, u|t=0 = g. Duhamel says

    Rn

    E(x y, t s)f(y, s) dyds (47)

    solves ut

    u= f, u

    |t=0 = 0, (f(y, s) = 0

    s < 0).

    Rigorous Treatment

    Suppose tu u= f in Rn (0, T).

    I= [e(ts)u(s)](x) =

    Rn

    E(x y, t s)u(y, s)dy ; (0< s < t < T)

    assumeuCb(Rn (0, t].I

    s =

    Rn

    E

    tu(y, s)dy

    e(ts)u(s)

    +

    Rn

    E u

    s(y, s)

    f+u

    dy (48)

    E(x y, t s)u(y, s)dy= E u (49)By Greens II vanishing boundary terms by taking very large ball. (50)

    Assume the following with 0 < a < b < T (51)

    uC2x(Rn (0, T)), (52)2i uCb(Rn [a, b]), (53)tuCb(Rn [a, b]). (54)

    (55)

    We have

    e(tb)u(b) e(ta)u(a) = b

    a Rn E(x y, t s)f(y, s)dydsa0, bt. RHS holds provided fCb(Rn [0, t])

    e(ta)u(a) =

    Rn

    E(x y, t a)u(y, a)dy (56)

    =

    E(x y, t a)u(y, 0)dy+

    E(x y, t a)[u(y, a) u(y, 0)]dy (57)

    (58)

    20

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    21/25

    [taking balls to attain local uniformly: more detail] Note that[u(y, a) u(y, 0)] is continuous sou(y, a)

    u(y, 0) locally uniformly, but since our integration domain is infinite, we take a compact

    domain and we have the convergence and outside the ball, we use the decayness of E to ensure theconvergence outside the ball

    e(tb)u(b) =

    E(x y, t b)u(y, t)dy (59)

    =

    E(x y, t b)u(y, t)dy+

    E(x y, t b)[u(y, b) u(y, t)]dy (60)

    Theorem 20. Let u C1(Rn (0, T))C2x(Rn (0, T)). Furthermore, assume u BC(Rn (0, b]),b < T. Also, assumeuBC1(Rn [a, b]) BC2(Rn [a, b]),a, b(0, T). gCb(Rn).

    tu u= f Rn (0, T)u= g Rn

    {t= 0

    }(61)

    Then,

    u(t) = etg+

    t0

    e(ts)f(s)ds; (0< t < T) [DF]

    In particular solution to (61) is unique in the class considered.

    Theorem 21. gCb(Rn), fCb(Rn (0, b]) C1b (Rn [a, b]), (0< a < b < T). Then (DF) solves(61)on(0, T).

    Proof.

    tu= etg+ f(t) +

    t0

    e(ts)f(s)ds (62)

    =f(t) +

    etg+ t

    o

    e(ts)f(s)ds

    (63)

    (64)

    To justify taking the Laplacian out from under the integral we need the following:

    e|x|2

    4t e|z|2/4t by|x| |z|t

    xE

    E|x|

    t E

    |z|t1/2

    ,

    E f=

    t0

    E(ts)1/2

    f

    21

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    22/25

    Lecture 24

    Last time Duhamels Principal

    Essentially a formula to solve the inhomogeneous heat equation: Let gCb(Rn)fCb(Rn (0, t]) C1b (Rn [s, t]) 0< s < t < T.

    We havec

    solves the heat equation tu u= f in Rn (0, T)u= g on Rn {0}

    Systems

    Letu, f : Rn (0, T)Rm, g : Rn Rm

    and consider tui ui= fiui = gi

    i= 1,...,m

    where explicitly the solution is

    ui(t) = etgi+

    t0

    e(ts)fi(s) ds, i= 1,...,m.

    we write for simplicity

    u(t) = etg+ t0

    e(ts)f(s)ds.

    We define theCb(,Rn) byu= max

    iui

    Nonlinear Reaction-diffusion Equationstu u= f(u)u= g

    where f : Rm Rm. (65)

    Example

    t u= (u v)3tv v= uv

    where f([u, v]T) = [(u v)3, uv]T

    We have solution

    u(t) = etug+

    t0

    e(ts)f(u(s))dsu = (u) (66)

    We attempt to iterate since ui are arguments off so for u1, u2,... where we hope that uk u, withu solving (65).

    22

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    23/25

    Lemma 5. LetgCb(Rn), f C1, uCb(Rn (0, T)) solves (66), thenu also solves (65).

    Proof. IfuC1

    b (Rn

    (s, t))0< s < t < T. Then its obvious because f u satisfies the conditionsof Duhamel.j (e

    (ts)f(u(s))) =O((t s)1/2) [previouslectureargumentonLap]= j u satisfies Duhmael. We use X = Cb(Rn (0, T)) for T > 0 to be chosen later [to insure

    contraction, we aim to use Banach Fixed point Theorem]. For some large M >0 such that

    U=BM X.l= etg.

    (u(t)) l(t) t0

    e(ts)f(u(s)) ds (67)

    t

    0

    f(u(s)) ds (68)

    t uBM, (69)where = sup|v|M|f(v)|. Now, uBM X

    (u) lT (u) l+ T g+ T

    Choose M 2g. T g= (u)BM for uBM

    which asserts the invariance of the ball. Now we need to assert contaction:

    (u(t)) (v(t))

    t

    0

    e(ts)[f(u(s)) f(v(s))] ds (70)

    t0

    f(u(s)) f(v(s)) ds (71)

    analogy with the Mean Value Theorem

    f(a) f(b) = f()(a b) (a, b)we have

    fi(a) fi(b) =fi() (a b)= a + (1 )b, [0, 1], so returning to our problem

    (u(t)) (v(t)) t0

    u(s) v(s) dstu vwhere

    = sup|v|M

    maxi,k |ifk(v)|,= (u) (v)Tu v

    chooseT < 1 and we have existence on (0, T).

    Theorem 22. LetgCb(Rn), f C1. ThenT >0 s.t (65) has a solutionuC1(Rn (0, T)) C2x(R

    n (0, T)). It is unique in the class considered in Duhamel. Moreover, unless|u(x, t)| astT as somexRn, u can be continued beyondT.

    23

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    24/25

    A Prioi estimates:

    Ifu is a solution on (0, T) thenu(T)

    uL2 (t)

    u more critical

  • 7/25/2019 PDE1 Lecture 16-25

    25/25

    Maximum Principal in Rn

    Figure needed. E(x, ) = E(ix,) = (4)n/2

    e|x|2/4

    satisfies

    F =f

    andtF= F

    Definev= u F. Assume:|u(x, t)| M e|x|2

    then,

    v(x, t)M e|x|2 e

    |x|2/4(+)

    [4(+ )]n/2 if|x| large.

    ifu

    0 at{

    t= 0}

    thentv v= tu 0

    then by maximum principal we have

    v0 in Rn (0, T) >0.

    souF 0 as 0.

    Allen-Cahn

    tu= u + u

    u3

    Consider

    tu= u + u2

    compare withtv= v

    2

    by taking differencew = u vw0 = uv.

    utu= t|u|2

    2 =uu + u2 u4 (74)

    =12

    |u|2 |u|2 + u2 u4 (75)

    since(uu) =|u|2 + uu

    |u|2 =2(u u) =(2uu) = 2|u|2 + 2uu

    25