PD Dr. Mechthild M. Gross, Andrea Matterne Midwife, Head of Midwifery Research and Education Unit...
-
Upload
maria-carter -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of PD Dr. Mechthild M. Gross, Andrea Matterne Midwife, Head of Midwifery Research and Education Unit...
PD Dr. Mechthild M. Gross, Andrea MatterneMidwife, Head of Midwifery Research and Education UnitDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
OptiBIRTHVBAC-Data from Germany
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
How „old“ are current numbers?
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System. National Vital Statistics Report. Births: Preliminary Data for 2007. Vol 57. Nr.12. 2009 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System. National Vital Statistics Report. Births: Final Data for 2006. Vol 57. Nr.7. 2009 3 Rossi AC, D’Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. AJOG 2008; 199: 224-314The Information Centre for health and social care. Maternity Statistics, England: 2007-08. 2009 http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/hospital-care/maternity/ nhs-maternity-statistics-england:-2007-08 5 BQS. Basisauswertung Geburtshilfe. http://www.bqs-qualitaetsreport.de/2008/ergebnisse/leistungsbereiche/geburtshilfe/basis6 BQS. Basisauswertung Geburtshilfe. http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2008/ergebnisse/leistungsbereiche/geburtshilfe/buaw/basis/0028_5_G.html7 Zentrum für Qualitätsmanagement. Auswertung Niedersächsische Perinatalstatistik.2008
USA England Germany Lower Saxony
Caesarean-Section Rate 2007 31.8%1 2007 24.6%4 2008 31.6%5 2008 30.9%7
Status Post Caesarean 2008 11.6%6 2008 12.6%7
VBAC – rates =TOL 2006 ~ 8.00%2 2008 47.1%7
Successful – VBAC 73.6%3 2008 67.2%7
Failed - VBAC 2008 32.8%7
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
The TOP 10 historical factors in pregnancy, Lower Saxony 2008
Parae
%
Allergy 23,1
Hereditary predispositions 17,5
Maternal age > 35 years 14,8
Status post cesarean 12,6
Previous serious illness 10,1
Obesity 8,2
>= 2 previous (spontaneous) abortions 5,3
Other pregnancy related risk factors (anamnestic findings) 5,2
Addiction 4,2
Complications during previous deliveries 5,53
Multiparae
%
Status post cesarean 23,9
Allergy 21,5
Maternal age > 35 years 19,7
Hereditary predispositions 16,2
Previous serious illness 9,2
Obesity 9,0
Complications during previous deliveries 8,7
>= 2 previous (spontaneous) abortions 7,6
Addiction 4,8
Other pregnancy related risk factors (anamnestic findings) 5,53
Centre for Quality and Management in Health Care at the Medical Chamber of Lower Saxony. Perinatal Statistics, 2008
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
David M Gross MM Wiemer A. Pachaly J Vetter K. Prior cesarean section – an acceptable risk for vaginal delivery at free-standing midwife-led birth centers? Results of the analysis of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in German birth centers. EJOGRB 2009;142:106-110Gregory KD, Korst LM, Fridman M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 452.e1-452-e12.Landon MB et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1016–234Rossi AC, D’Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. AJOG 2008; 199: 224-31
Sucessful VBAC-Rate: 73%
• 4-year-prospective study 1999 -2002, TOL=14,529, S-VBAC=73.6%, Predictors for S-VBAC were previous vaginal delivery, previous indication not being dystocia, spontaneous labour, birth weight <4000g, Caucasian race (Landon 2005)
• Population based cohort study from 2002, TOL=41,450, S-low-risk-VBAC= 73.76%, S-high-risk-VBAC=50.31% with at least one maternal, fetal, or placental condition (Gregory 2008)
• Metaanalysis, 7 studies, 2000-2007, TOL=24,349, S-VBAC=73%, a higher risk of uterine rupture in women planning VBAC than ERCS is counterbalanced by a reduction of maternal morbidity and hysterectomy when VBAC is successful Rossi (2008)
• Comparison of 364 VBAC with one previous caesarean and 6,448 women with their second labour in birth centres, S-VBAC=73.5% (David 2009)
NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean. Draft Statement, March 26, 2010
“Although TOL rate has declined dramatically over the past several decades, the vaginal delivery rate after TOL has remained constant at approximately 74 percent.”
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
Collective Data of Lower Saxony and Hessen
Land Annual birth rate (2010)
C-section rate
Women with c-section in history
TOL with c-section in history
ERCS f-VBAC Overall Re-c-section rate
s-VBAC/ all TOL´s
S-VBAC/ women with c-section in history
Lower Saxony
2011
2010
56,532
58.492
33.4%
32,4%
13.8%
25,1%
?
?
51.3%
49.9%
?
21.4%
11.5% (unclear)
12.1%
?
73.6%
27.7%
26,2%
Hessen 48,544 16,488
34%
6,409
13.2%
2,864
44.7%
3545
55.3%
1,094
17.1%
4,639
72.4%
1770
61.8%
1,770
27.6%
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
Legend of the Table
Federal state
Annual birth rate
C-section rate
Women with c-section in history
SS-Risiko ist Z.n. Sectio as documented in the maternal
record
TOL with c-section in history
Die Absicht einer vaginalen Entbindung wird nicht dokumentiert
Some of those may have documented a duration of labour
ERCS
SS-Risiko ist Z.n. Sectio und jetziger Geburtsmodus ist primäre Sectio, Resectio und primäre Sectio nach Misgav-Ladach
f-VBAC
SS-Risiko ist Z.n. Sectio und Sectio mit Geburtsdauer >0 (s. auch Anmerkun
g TOL)
Overall Re-c-section rateAls Geburts-modus „Resectio“ ausgewiesene Geburten, denkbar wäre jedoch hier alle Sectiones bei SS-Risiko Z.n. Sectio zu zählen. Aus vielen Kliniken wissen wir, dass der OPS „Resectio“ gar nicht verwendet wird sondern prim. oder sek. Sectio ausgewählt wird. In den meisten Fällen wird die Resectio eine geplante also prim. Sectio sein.
s-VBAC/ all TOL´s
Mehrgebärende mit SS-Risiko ist Z.n. Sectio und Geburtsdauer > 0 (s. auch Anmerkung TOL)
S-VBAC/ women with c-section in history
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
Overview of Data
Centre Annual birth rate (2010)
C-section rate
Women with c-section in history
TOL with c-section in history
ERCS f-VBAC Overall Re-c-section rate
s-VBAC/ all TOL´s
S-VBAC/ women with c-section in history
1 2,012
28.3% 10.7% 55.4% 40.9% 35.8%
2 1,670 628
37.6%
181/1670
10.8%
69/181
38.1%
112/181
61.9%
24/69
34.8%
136/181
75.1%
45/69
65.2%
45/181
24.9%
3 2,596 824
31.7%
286/2596
11%
140/286
49%
146/286
51%
55/149
39.3%
201/286
70.3%
85/140
60.7%
85/286
29.7%
4 2,286 625
28.6%
242/2286
10.6%
107/242
44.2%
135/242
55.8%
40/107
37.4%
175/242
72.3%
67/107
62.6%
67/242
27.7%
5 1,995
30.2%
251 (in previous birth)
113/251
45%
80/ 80/251
31.9%
AG Hebammenwissenschaft PD Dr. Mechthild M. Groß
ACOG Practice Bulletin Nr.54 Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery. 2004
The American Academy of Family Physicians. Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC)
German Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (DGGG). 2008
Guidelines
1 - USA
3 - Canada
4 - UKRCOGNICE
5 - Germany
SOGC clinical practice guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. 2005
NICE Clinical Practice Algorithm. RCOG Press. 2004