PCT – Statistics

44
PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Nineteenth Session Canberra, February 8 to 10, 2012

description

PCT – Statistics. Meeting of International Authorities Nineteenth Session Canberra, February 8 to 10, 2012. PCT – International Filings. 2009: 155,403 international applications (-4.8%) 2010: 164,303 international applications (+5.7%) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of PCT – Statistics

Page 1: PCT – Statistics

PCT – Statistics

Meeting of International AuthoritiesNineteenth Session

Canberra, February 8 to 10, 2012

Page 2: PCT – Statistics

PCT International Application Filings

0

20'000

40'000

60'000

80'000

100'000

120'000

140'000

160'000

180'000

197

8

197

9

198

0

198

1

198

2

198

3

198

4

198

5

198

6

198

7

198

8

198

9

199

0

199

1

199

2

199

3

199

4

199

5

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

200

0

200

1

200

2

200

3

200

4

200

5

200

6

200

7

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

Source: WIPO Statistics Database; WIPO estimate

PCT – International Filings2009: 155,403 international applications (-4.8%)

2010: 164,303 international applications (+5.7%)

2011: 161,669 international applications (until end November)

2 millionth PCT application published on PATENTSCOPE on 26 January 2012

Page 3: PCT – Statistics

Trends in PCT Applications

Page 4: PCT – Statistics

Forecast Summary

PCT Filings Growth

2007 159'923 6.9%

2008 163'238 2.1%

2009 155'403 -4.8%

2010 164'303 5.7%

2011 174'200 6.1%

2012 181'800 4.4%

2013 189'500 4.2%

2014 195'200 3.0%

2015 200'800 2.9%

Page 5: PCT – Statistics

PCT – International applications

Page 6: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications by Top 10 Origins in 2010

The magnitude of PCT applications from the US dropped at a lower rate (-1.4%) in 2010 compared to 2009 (-11.7%) and 2008 (-4.4%).

Page 7: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications by next 10 Highest Origins in 2010

Apart from China and India, all of the top 20 origins are high-income group countriesChina (55.6%), India (33.7%) and the Republic of Korea (20.3%) saw the highest growth rates

Page 8: PCT – Statistics

Country share in total PCT applications

Page 9: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications filed by Region of Origin of Applicant for Asia, Europe and North America

10.8 1.7 -0.7

Average Annual Growth Rate (%): 2005-2010

0

15,000

30,000

45,000

60,000

75,000

PC

T A

pp

licati

on

s

Asia Europe Northern AmericaRegion

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Page 10: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications filed by Region of Origin of Applicant for Africa, Latin America and Oceania

-3.1 2.2 -2.9

Average Annual Growth Rate (%): 2005-2010

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

PC

T A

pp

licati

on

s

Oceania Latin America and the Caribbean AfricaRegion

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Page 11: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications filed by Income Group (1)

Upper middle-income countries accounted for 9.4% of total PCT applications in 2010. Four-fifths of this share is due to China.

Page 12: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications filed by Income Group (2)

Growth in filings for middle-income group remained positive during the overall drop in filings in 2009 and increased sharply in 2010

Page 13: PCT – Statistics

Top 10 Middle Income Countries

10.3 -2.8 10.4 18.2 58.4 -5.2 0.3 10.0 53.6 47.2 5.9

Average Annual Growth Rate (%): 2005-2010

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

PC

T A

pp

licati

on

s

IndiaRussian FederationBrazil Turkey Malaysia South Africa Mexico Ukraine Chile Thailand All othersCountry of Origin

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Data exclude China as country of origin (12,295 PCT applications for 2010).

Page 14: PCT – Statistics

Top 20 PCT Applicants in 2010

Data are based on publication dateSource: WIPO Statistics Database

Page 15: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications by Type of Applicant (Top 30 Origins by Published International Applications for 2010)

Page 16: PCT – Statistics

PCT Applications by Field of TechnologyPublication Year

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

I Electrical engineering1 Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy 7,000 7,874 8,933 8,972 9,143 1.92 Audio-visual technology 4,723 4,893 4,736 4,405 4,245 -3.63 Telecommunications 6,401 7,369 8,014 7,331 6,230 -15.04 Digital communication 5,972 7,574 8,731 9,022 10,581 17.35 Basic communication processes 1,302 1,360 1,462 1,396 1,273 -8.86 Computer technology 9,916 11,208 11,708 10,268 9,540 -7.17 IT methods for management 1,662 1,963 2,458 2,167 2,058 -5.08 Semiconductors 4,339 4,681 5,039 5,612 5,847 4.2II Instruments9 Optics 4,089 4,270 4,548 4,312 4,178 -3.110 Measurement 5,947 6,547 6,844 6,746 6,377 -5.511 Analysis of biological materials 1,717 1,747 1,800 1,864 1,759 -5.612 Control 2,348 2,389 2,526 2,387 2,102 -11.913 Medical technology 9,640 10,478 11,069 10,454 10,465 0.1III Chemistry14 Organic fine chemistry 5,976 6,057 6,107 5,677 5,511 -2.915 Biotechnology 4,875 5,120 5,287 5,285 5,206 -1.516 Pharmaceuticals 8,680 8,797 8,968 8,473 7,843 -7.417 Macromolecular chemistry, polymers 2,994 3,064 3,135 3,085 2,812 -8.818 Food chemistry 1,582 1,575 1,685 1,525 1,525 0.019 Basic materials chemistry 3,897 4,400 4,711 4,676 4,567 -2.320 Materials, metallurgy 2,369 2,555 2,798 2,755 2,859 3.821 Surface technology, coating 2,595 2,594 2,668 2,466 2,436 -1.222 Micro-structural and nano-technology 196 246 305 350 342 -2.323 Chemical engineering 3,349 3,464 3,790 3,625 3,564 -1.724 Environmental technology 1,700 1,972 2,232 2,216 2,131 -3.8IV Mechanical engineering25 Handling 3,754 3,984 3,900 3,721 3,619 -2.726 Machine tools 2,651 2,834 3,202 2,951 2,710 -8.227 Engines, pumps, turbines 3,181 3,615 4,132 4,380 4,288 -2.128 Textile and paper machines 2,513 2,233 2,300 2,159 1,944 -10.029 Other special machines 3,580 3,655 4,086 3,981 3,741 -6.030 Thermal processes and apparatus 1,594 1,856 2,129 2,359 2,379 0.831 Mechanical elements 3,461 3,852 4,404 4,136 4,002 -3.232 Transport 4,814 5,300 5,966 5,834 5,455 -6.5V Other fields33 Furniture, games 3,397 3,653 3,635 3,279 3,078 -6.134 Other consumer goods 2,752 2,933 3,161 3,005 3,000 -0.235 Civil engineering 3,577 3,847 4,337 4,411 4,354 -1.3

Source: WIPO Statistics Database

Change Compared

to 2009 (%)Technical Field

Page 17: PCT – Statistics

Main Changes in Numbers of Applications by Fields of Technology from 2009 to 2010

Increases:

Digital communication: +17.3% Semiconductors: +4.2% Materials, metallurgy: +3.8% Electrical machinery: +1.9% Thermal processes

and apparatus: +0.8% Medical technology: +0.1%

Decreases:

Telecommunications: -15.0% Control: -11.9% Textile and paper: -10.0% Basic communication

processes: -8.8% Macromolecular

chemistry, Polymers: -8.8% Machine tools: -8.2%

Page 18: PCT – Statistics

PCT – Method of Filing (1)

International Filing Year

Share of electronic filings, incl. Paper and digital (%)28.7 34.7 40.9 45.8 48.9 54.0 57.6 67.4 74.3 79.8 83.8

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

175,000

PC

T A

pp

licati

on

s

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Paper Paper + Digital Fully Electronic (PDF, SEF and XML)

Page 19: PCT – Statistics

PCT - Method of Filing (2)

Share of PCT filings by Medium of Filing (%)

Paper EASY PDF XML EFS-Web

2006 42.4 25.2 13.2 18.4 0.8

2007 32.6 14.8 25.2 18.9 8.6

2009 20.1 7.3 37.0 22.8 12.8

2010 16.2 5.5 40.8 24.3 13.2

2011 (to date) 13.4 4.5 42.6 26.4 13.1

Page 20: PCT – Statistics

PCT - Method of Filing Forecast (1)

Page 21: PCT – Statistics

PCT – Method of Filing Forecast (2)

Page 22: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of Filing and Publication LanguagesDistribution of Filing and Publication Languages

0

415

783

1,434

5,283

8,373

14,817

16,946

34,866

90,308

Arabic

Portuguese

Russian

Spanish

French

Korean

Chinese

German

Japanese

EnglishL

ang

uag

es

Publications in 2011 Filings in 2010 Filings in 2011

Note: 2011 f iling data is incompleteSource: WIPO Statistics Database

Page 23: PCT – Statistics

PCT – Non-Resident National Phase Entries

Around 406.800 non-resident national phase entries for 2010 (8% growth on 2009) - includes entries toregional officesTotal number of national phase entries for 2010 (resident plus non-resident) around 477,500 for 2010

Page 24: PCT – Statistics

PCT National Phase Entries Filed Abroad for Top 10 Origins in 2010

US has highest number of PCT national phase entries filed abroad, but saw a decline (-0.1%) in 2010 and (-13%) in 2009.

Page 25: PCT – Statistics

PCT National Phase Entries Filed Abroad for Next 10 Highest Origins in 2010

PCT national phase entries abroad from China and Spain grew by over 30% from 2009 to 2010.

Page 26: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of PCT National Phase Entries by Region in 2009

Europe: 39.0%Northern America: 32.3%Aisa: 23.7%Oceania: 1.7%Latin America and the Caribbean: 0.5%Africa: 0.2%Unknown: 2.6%

Page 27: PCT – Statistics

Share of PCT National Phase Entries in Total Abroad Filings(Top 15 high income countries in abroad filings)

0

25

50

75

100

Sh

are

(%

)

Swed

en

Unite

d St

ates

of A

mer

ica

Nethe

rland

s

Unite

d Ki

ngdo

m

Finla

nd

Switz

erla

nd

Austra

lia

Belgi

um

Fran

ceIta

ly

Germ

any

High

Inco

me

Tota

l

Israe

l

Japa

n

Canad

a

Repu

blic o

f Kor

ea

Country of Origin

Page 28: PCT – Statistics

Share of PCT National Phase Entries in Total Abroad Filings(Top 15 middle income countries in abroad filings)

0

25

50

75

100

Sh

are

(%

)

Cuba

Sout

h Af

rica

Turk

ey

Brazil

Mex

ico

Russ

ian

Fede

ratio

n

Mid

dle

Inco

me

Indi

a

China

Mal

aysia

Chile

Argen

tina

Bulga

ria

Thai

land

Ukrai

ne

Belar

us

Country of Origin

Page 29: PCT – Statistics

PCT – National Phase Entries by Office

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

PC

T N

ati

on

al Ph

ase

En

trie

s

Euro

pean

Pat

ent O

ffice

Unite

d St

ates

of A

mer

ica

China

Japa

n

Canad

a

Repu

blic o

f Kor

eaIn

dia

Austra

lia

Brazil

Mex

ico

Russ

ian

Fede

ratio

n

Sing

apor

e

Sout

h Af

rica

Israe

l

New Z

eala

nd

Patent Office

1995 2000 2005 2009

Page 30: PCT – Statistics

National Phase Entries by Top Patent Office and Country of Origin

16.3% growth in national phase entries at USPTO in 2010 to become largest recipient (previously EPO).

8.0% growth in national phase entries at KIPO in 2010 to become 5 th largest recipient.

Page 31: PCT – Statistics

Share of PCT national phase entries in total non-resident filings

Share of PCT national phase entries compared to Paris-route for non-resident applicants increased from 25.6% in 1995 to 53.1% in 2010.

Page 32: PCT – Statistics

Share of PCT national phase entries in total non-resident filings by Patent Office for 2010

Page 33: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of ISRs by ISA (1)

69013

30968

23307

15811

13298

3425

2209

2079

1440

924

804

409

312

301

European Patent Office

Japan

Republic of Korea

United States of America

China

Australia

Canada

Sweden

Spain

Finland

Russian Federation

Austria

Brazil

Nordic Patent Institute

2009

2010

Page 34: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of ISRs by ISA (2)

Page 35: PCT – Statistics

Timeliness in Transmitting ISRs

68.4% ISRs transmitted within the 16-month time limit in January to September 2011 [up from 67.0% in 2010 and 62.5% in 2009]

Page 36: PCT – Statistics

Timeliness in Transmitting ISRs in 2011

Timeliness measured by the date the IB receives the ISASource: WIPO Statistics Database

Page 37: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of SISRs by SISA

Supplementary International Searching Authority

Year

2009 2010 2011

to end Sept.

Total 24 41 24

Austria     1

European Patent Office   3 4

Nordic Patent Institute   1  

Russian Federation 22 35 17

Sweden 2 2 2

Page 38: PCT – Statistics

Demands for International Preliminary Examination at International Authorities

05'000

10'00015'00020'00025'00030'000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f D

eman

ds

Others

USPTO

JPO

EPO

Demand for International Preliminary Examination fell by 46.3% from 2005 to 2010. Source: WIPO Statistics Database. Data for 2011 are provisional and incomplete (to end September).

Page 39: PCT – Statistics

Distribution of IPRPs by IPEA

Page 40: PCT – Statistics

Timeliness in Transmitting IPRPs

68.7% IPRPs transmitted within less than 29 months in January to September 2011 [down from 70.7% in 2010 and 71.4% in 2009]

Page 41: PCT – Statistics

Timeliness in Transmitting IPRPs by IPEA in 2011

Timeliness measured by the date the IB receives the IPRPSource: WIPO Statistics Database

Page 42: PCT – Statistics

PCT-Patent Prosecution Highway Requests

Source: WIPO based on data from the JPO, October 2011

Page 43: PCT – Statistics

PCT-PPH Grant Rate and Pendency Time

Figures in parentheses refer to the normal examination procedureSource: WIPO based on data from the JPO, October 2011

Page 44: PCT – Statistics

Thank you for your attention!