P/C Insurance Company Survey Group Meeting Washington, DC August 19, 2013
-
Upload
barry-palmer -
Category
Documents
-
view
30 -
download
0
description
Transcript of P/C Insurance Company Survey Group Meeting Washington, DC August 19, 2013
Overview & Outlook for the P/C Insurance Industry:
Trends, Challenges and Opportunitiesin 2013 and Beyond
P/C Insurance Company Survey Group MeetingWashington, DCAugust 19, 2013
Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org
2
P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview
So Far, So Good:Profit Recovery in 2013 After High CAT Losses in 2011-12
2
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2013:Q1 ($ Millions)
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.1% 2009 ROE = 5.0% 2010 ROE = 6.6% 2011 ROAS1 = 3.5% 2012 ROAS1 = 5.9% 2013:Q1 ROAS1 = 9.6%
• ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 9.7% ROAS in 2013:Q1, 6.2% ROAS in 2012, 4.7% ROAS for 2011, 7.6% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $3
6,8
19
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$3
5,2
04
$1
9,4
56 $
33
,52
2
$1
4,3
94
$2
8,6
72
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13:Q1
2012:Q1 ROAS
was 7.2%Net income is up
substantially (+40.9%) from 2012:Q1 $10.2B
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
:Q1
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2013:Q1*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs. 2011-13 figures are estimates based on ROAS data. Note: Data for 2008-2013 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2006:12.7%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5%2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years9 Years
2012: 5.9%
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
2013:Q1 9.7%
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2008 -2012 figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2012 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 103.2, 2011 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 108.1, ROAS = 3.5%. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
97.5
100.6 100.1 100.8
92.7
101.299.5
101.0
94.8
102.4
106.5
95.79.7%
6.2%4.7%
7.9%7.4%
4.3%
9.6%
15.9%
14.3%
12.7% 10.9%
8.8%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013:Q10%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Combined Ratio ROE*
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generates an ROE of ~7.0% in 2012, ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10,
10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
Catastrophes and lower investment
income pulled down ROE in 2012
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
9
Growth Will Expand Insurer Exposure Base Across Most Lines
9
10
US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 8/13; Insurance Information Institute.
2.7
%0
.5%
3.6
%3
.0%
1.7
%-1
.8%
1.3
%-3
.7%
-5.3
%-0
.3%
1.4
%5
.0%
2.3
%2
.2%
2.6
%2
.4%
0.1
%2
.5%
1.3
%4
.1%
2.0
%1
.3% 3
.1%
1.1
%1
.7%
2.3
%2
.7%
2.8
%2
.9%
2.9
%2
.9%
0.4
%
-8.9%
4.1
%1
.1%
1.8
%2
.5% 3.6
%3
.1%
-9%
-7%
-5%
-3%
-1%
1%
3%
5%
7%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
12
:1Q
12
:2Q
12
:3Q
12
:4Q
13
:1Q
13
:2Q
13
:3Q
13
:4Q
14
:1Q
14
:2Q
14
:3Q
14
:4Q
Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and
Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction
was severe
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982
drop of 6.8%
2013 is expected to see uneven growth,
then gradually accelerate throughout the year and into 2014
11
Real GDP by State Percent Change, 2012:Highest 25 States
13
.4
4.8
3.9
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
ND TX OR WA CA MN UT IN TN WV NC SC AZ FL IA MD MS MA MI OH US CO GA MT OK MO
Pe
rce
nt
Ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
North Dakota was the economic growth juggernaut of the US
in 2012—by far
Only 10 states experienced growth in excess of 3%, which is what we would see nationally in
a more typical recovery
12
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
-0.1
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
IL PA HI LA NE NV WI KS KY RI AR NJ NY AL VT AK VA DC ME NH ID DE NM SD WY CT
Pe
rce
nt
Ch
an
ge
(%
)
Real GDP by State Percent Change, 2012: Lowest 25 States
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
Connecticut was the only state to shrink in 2012
Growth rates in 8 states (and DC) were still below
1% in 2012
74
.47
3.6
73
.67
2.2
73
.6 76
67
.86
8.9
68
.26
7.7 7
1.6 74
.57
4.2 77
.56
7.5 69
.8 74
.37
1.5
63
.75
5.7 5
9.5
60
.9 64
.16
9.9
75
.07
5.3
76
.27
6.4 79
.37
3.2
72
.3 74
.38
2.6
82
.77
4.5
73
.8 77
.67
8.6
84
.58
4.1
85
.1
76
.4
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0M
ar-
10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-
10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0S
ep
-10
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0D
ec-
10
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1M
ar-
11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-
11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1S
ep
-11
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1D
ec-
11
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2M
ar-
12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-
12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2O
ct-1
2N
ov-
12
De
c-1
2Ja
n-1
3F
eb
-13
Ma
r-1
3A
pr-
13
Ma
y-1
3Ju
n-1
3Ju
l-1
3
Consumer Sentiment Survey (1966 = 100)
January 2010 through July 2013
Consumer confidence has been low for years amid high unemployment, falling home prices and other factors adversely impact
consumers, but improved substantially over the past two years
Source: University of Michigan; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among consumers has remained fairly strong
despite tax hikes, federal budget concerns. July’s reading was
the highest since July 2007
16
17
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.2
10.4
11.6
12.7
14.4
15.5 15
.9
16.0
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.216
.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13F 14F15F 16F17F18F 19F
(Millions of Units)
Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2019F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (8/13 and 3/13); Insurance Information Institute.
Car/Light Truck Sales Will Continue to Recover from the 2009 Low Point, Bolstering the Auto Insurer Growth and the Manufacturing Sector Along
With Workers Comp Exposures
New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the late 1960s. Forecast for 2013-14 is
still below 1999-2007 average of 17 million units, but a robust recovery is well underway.
Job growth and improved credit market conditions will boost auto sales in
2013 and beyond
Truck purchases by contractors are especially strong
19
Average Age of Vehicles on the Road, 2006—2013
11.211.4
10.910.6
10.310.110.09.9
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Sources: Polk, August 2013 Survey; Insurance Information Institute.
Average Vehicle Age (Years)
The average age of a vehicle on the road is is expected to continue to increase until 2018. By 2018, the number of vehicles 12+ years old is
expected to rise 11.6% from 2013 and the number that are under 5 years old is expected to increase by 41%
The average vehicle age reached a record
11.4 years in 2013
19
Average vehicle age continues to increase because the slow economy leads many drivers
to keep cars on the road longer and because cars are
becoming more reliable
20
Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2013*
*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through July 2013; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur
approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early
2000s and likely the early 2010s)
“Hard” markets tend to occur
during recessionary
periods
Pricing peak occurred in late
2010 at 5.3%, falling to 2.8% by Mar. 2012
The July 2013 reading of 3.6% is
up from 3.4% a year earlier
22
(Millions of Units)
New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2019F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
21
.64
1.5
71
.60 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
71
.80
1.3
6
0.9
10
.55
0.5
9
0.6
1 0.7
8 0.9
7
1.1
8 1.3
5
1.4
41
.50
1.5
11
.50
1.3
51.4
61
.29
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13F14F15F16F17F18F19F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (8/13 and 3/13); Insurance Information Institute.
Insurers Are Starting to See Meaningful Exposure Growth for the First Time Since 2005 Associated with Home Construction: Construction Risk Exposure,
Surety, Commercial Auto; Potent Driver of Workers Comp Exposure
New home starts plunged 72% from 2005-2009; A net
annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since records began
in 1959
Job growth, low inventories of existing homes, low mortgage
rates and demographics are stimulating new home construction
for the first time in years
25
Average Premium forHome Insurance Policies**
* Insurance Information Institute Estimates/Forecasts **Excludes state-run insurers.Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute estimates for 2011-2013 based on CPI data and other data.
$508$536
$593
$668
$822 $830
$880$909
$945$983
$1,022
$804$764
$729
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
$1,100
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11* 12* 13*
Countrywide Home Insurance Expenditures Increased by an Estimated 4.0% in 2011-2013
26
Construction Employment,Jan. 2010—July 2013*
*Seasonally adjustedSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
5,58
15,
522
5,54
25,
554
5,52
75,
512
5,49
75,
519
5,49
95,
501
5,49
75,
468
5,43
5 5,47
85,
485
5,49
75,
524
5,53
05,
547
5,54
6 5,58
35,
576
5,57
7 5,61
25,
629
5,64
45,
640
5,63
65,
615
5,62
25,
627
5,63
05,
633
5,64
95,
673 5,
711
5,73
5 5,78
35,
797
5,79
25,
791
5,79
95,
793
5,400
5,450
5,500
5,550
5,600
5,650
5,700
5,750
5,800
5,850
5,900
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-10
Jul-1
0A
ug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11Ju
l-11
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
122/
30/2
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12Ju
l-12
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
132/
30/2
Mar
-13
Apr
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13Ju
l-13
Construction employment growth accelerated in the second half of
2012 but flattened out by mid-2013. Construction is a key driver of
workers comp exposure growth.
(Thousands)
28
Nonfarm Payroll (Wages and Salaries):Quarterly, 2005–2013:Q2
Note: Recession indicated by gray shaded column. Data are seasonally adjusted annual rates.Sources: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Billions
$5,500
$5,750
$6,000
$6,250
$6,500
$6,750
$7,000
$7,25005
:Q1
05:Q
205
:Q3
05:Q
406
:Q1
06:Q
206
:Q3
06:Q
407
:Q1
07:Q
207
:Q3
07:Q
408
:Q1
08:Q
208
:Q3
08:Q
409
:Q1
09:Q
209
:Q3
09:Q
410
:Q1
10:Q
210
:Q3
10:Q
411
:Q1
11:Q
211
:Q3
11:Q
412
:Q1
12:Q
212
:Q3
12:Q
413
:Q1
13:Q
2
Prior Peak was 2008:Q1 at $6.60 trillion
Latest (2013:Q2) was $7.09 trillion, a new peak--$762B
above 2009 trough
Recent trough (2009:Q3) was $6.25 trillion, down
5.3% from prior peak
Payrolls are 13.4% above
their 2009 trough and up 2.7% over
the past year
28
31
Value of Construction Put in Place, June 2013 vs. June 2012*
-9.3%
-4.7%
-9.4%
3.3%
9.7%
18.1%
1.4%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
TotalConstruction
Total PrivateConstruction
Residential--Private
Non-Residential--
Private
Total PublicConstruction
Residential-Public
Non-Residential--
Public
Overall Construction Activity is Up, But Growth Is Entirely in the Private Sector as State/Local Government Budget Woes Continue
Growth (%)
Private sector construction activity is up in the
residential segment but down in nonresidential
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute.
Private: +9.7% Public: -9.3%
Public sector construction activity remains depressed
33
Value of Public Construction Put in Place, by Segment, June 2013 vs. June 2012*
3.9%
-15.3%
-5.1%
-15.3%
7.4%
-12.4%
5.2%
-0.1%
-17.0%
9.6%
-9.3%
-4.7%
-9.4%
-25.5%
-20.2%
-30%-25%
-20%-15%
-10%-5%
0%5%
10%15%
To
tal
Pu
bli
cC
on
stru
ctio
n
Res
iden
tial
To
tal
No
nre
sid
enti
al
Off
ice
Co
mm
erci
al
Hea
lth
Car
e
Ed
uca
tio
nal
Pu
bli
c S
afet
y
Am
use
men
t &
Rec
.
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
Po
wer
Hig
hw
ay &
Str
eet
Sew
age
&W
aste
Dis
po
sal
Wat
er S
up
ply
Co
nse
rvat
ion
&D
evel
op
.
Public Construction Activity is Down in Many Segments as State and Local Budgets Remain Under Stress; Improvement Possible in 2014.
Growth (%)
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute.
Public sector construction activity is down substantially in most segments, a situation that will likely persist, dragging
on public entity risk exposures
Transportation and Power projects lead
public sector construction
58
.35
7.1
60
.45
9.6
57
.85
5.3
55
.15
5.2
55
.3 56
.9 58
.25
8.5 6
0.8
61
.45
9.7
59
.75
4.2 55
.85
1.4 52
.55
2.5
51
.85
2.2 53
.1 54
.15
1.9 53
.35
4.1
52
.55
0.2
50
.55
0.7
51
.65
1.7
49
.95
0.2
53
.1 54
.2
50
.74
9.0 5
0.9
55
.4
51
.3
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0M
ar-
10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-
10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0S
ep
-10
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0D
ec-
10
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1M
ar-
11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-
11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1S
ep
-11
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1D
ec-
11
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2M
ar-
12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-
12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2S
ep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2D
ec-
12
Jan
-13
Fe
b-1
3M
ar-
13
Ap
r-1
3M
ay-
13
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
ISM Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through July 2013
The manufacturing sector expanded for 39 of the 43 months from Jan. 2010 through June 2013. Recent weakness stems largely from woes in
Europe and a Slowdown in China.
Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/mfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute.
Manufacturing expanded in May, albeit modestly
34
36
Manufacturing Growth for Selected Sectors, 2013 vs. 2013*
4.1%
-0.8%
7.0%
0.2%
3.0%
-0.6%-1.4%
2.7%
5.4%
1.3%2.5%
15.2%
-2.7%
0.6%
-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%
All
Ma
nu
fact
uri
ng
Du
rab
le M
fg.
Wo
od
Pro
du
cts
Pri
ma
ryM
eta
ls
Fa
bri
cate
dM
eta
ls
Ma
chin
ery
Ele
ctri
cal
Eq
uip
.
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
nE
qu
ip.
No
n-D
ura
ble
Mfg
.
Fo
od
Pro
du
cts
Pe
tro
leu
m &
Co
al
Ch
em
ica
l
Pla
stic
s &
Ru
bb
er
Te
xtile
Pro
du
cts
Manufacturing Is Expanding—Albeit More Slowly—Across a Number of Sectors that Will Contribute to Growth in Insurable Exposures Including: WC,
Commercial Property, Commercial Auto and Many Liability Coverages
Growth (%)
Manufacturing of durable goods was especially
strong in 2012 but weakened in 2013
*Seasonally adjusted; Date are YTD comparing data through May 2013 to the same period in 2012.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/
Durables: +2.5% Non-Durables: +0.2%
38
Manufacturing Employment,Jan. 2010—July 2013*
11,4
6011
,460
11,4
6611
,497
11,5
3111
,539
11,5
5811
,548
11,5
5411
,555
11,5
7711
,590
11,6
2411
,662
11,6
8211
,707
11,7
1511
,724
11,7
4711
,760
11,7
6211
,770
11,7
6911
,797
11,8
4111
,870
11,9
1011
,920
11,9
2611
,935
11,9
5711
,943
11,9
2511
,931
11,9
3811
,951
11,9
6511
,988
11,9
8411
,977
11,9
7211
,969
11,9
75
11,000
11,200
11,400
11,600
11,800
12,000
12,200
12,400
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-10
Jul-1
0A
ug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11Ju
l-11
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
122/
30/2
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12Ju
l-12
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
13F
eb-1
3M
ar-1
3A
pr-1
3M
ay-1
3Ju
n-13
Jul-1
3
Manufacturing employment is up by more than 500,000 or 4.5% since Jan.
2010—a surprising source of strength in the economy. The sector has weakened
recently as US corporations remains cautious and Europe, China slow.
*Seasonally adjustedSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
(Thousands)
50
.7 52
.7 54
.15
4.6
54
.85
3.5
53
.75
2.8 53
.95
4.6 56 5
7.1 5
9.4
59
.75
6.3
54
.45
3.3
53
.45
3.8
52
.65
2.6
52
.65
2.6
53
.05
6.8
56
.15
5.0
53
.75
4.1
52
.75
2.9 54
.3 55
.25
4.8
54
.85
5.7
55
.25
6.0
53
.15
3.7
52
.25
6.0
54
.4
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0M
ar-
10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-
10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0S
ep
-10
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0D
ec-
10
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1M
ar-
11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-
11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1S
ep
-11
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1D
ec-
11
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2M
ar-
12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-
12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2S
ep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2D
ec-
12
Jan
-13
Fe
b-1
3M
ar-
13
Ap
r-1
3M
ay-
13
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through July 2013
Non-manufacturing industries have been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/nonmfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute.
Optimism among non-manufacturers is stable
and remains expansionary in 2013
39
40
43,6
9448
,125
69,3
0062
,436
64,0
04 71,2
77 81,2
3582
,446
63,8
5363
,235
64,8
53 71,5
4970
,643
62,3
0452
,374
51,9
5953
,549
54,0
2744
,367
37,8
8435
,472
40,0
9938
,540
35,0
3734
,317
39,2
0119
,695 28
,322
43,5
4660
,837
56,2
8247
,806
40,0
75
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Business Bankruptcy Filings,1980-2012
Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633; Insurance Information Institute
Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines as Business Bankruptcies Begin to Decline
2012 bankruptcies totaled 40,075, down 16.2% from 2011—the third
consecutive year of decline. Business bankruptcies more than tripled during the financial crisis.
% Change Surrounding Recessions
1980-82 58.6%1980-87 88.7%1990-91 10.3%2000-01 13.0%2006-09 208.9%*
40
41
Private Sector Business Starts, 1993:Q2 – 2012:Q4*
17
51
86
17
41
80
18
61
92
18
81
87 18
91
86 1
90 1
94
19
11
99 2
04
20
21
95
19
61
96
20
62
06
20
11
92
19
82
06
20
62
03
21
12
05
21
22
00 2
05
20
42
04
19
72
03
20
92
01
19
21
92
19
32
01 20
42
02
21
0 21
22
09
21
6 22
0 22
32
20
22
02
10
22
12
12
20
42
18
20
92
07
20
71
99
19
1 19
31
72 1
76
16
91
84
17
5 17
91
88
20
01
83 1
87 1
91
19
71
93
19
1 19
31
92
20
3
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure, But
Are Recovering Slowly* Data through Dec. 30, 2012 are the latest available as of Aug. 16, 2013; Seasonally adjusted. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t08.htm.
(Thousands)
Business starts were up 2.8% in 2012 to 769,000 following a 2.2% gain to
748,000 in 2011. Start-ups could accelerate in 2013.
Business Starts2006: 872,0002007: 843,0002008: 790,0002009: 697,000 2010: 742,000 2011: 748,000 2012: 769,000
41
43
12 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed
Export-Oriented Industries
Health Sciences
Health Care
Energy (Traditional)
Alternative Energy
Petrochemical
Agriculture
Natural Resources
Technology (incl. Biotechnology)
Light Manufacturing
Insourced Manufacturing
Many industries are
poised for growth, though
insurers’ ability to
capitalize on these
industries varies widely
Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking, Pipelines)
44
U.S. Insured Catastrophe Loss Update
Catastrophe Losses in Recent Years Have Been Very High
44
45
$1
2.6
$1
1.0
$3
.8
$1
4.3
$1
1.6
$6
.1
$3
4.7
$7
.6
$1
6.3
$3
3.7
$7
3.4
$1
0.5
$7
.5
$2
9.2
$1
1.5
$1
4.4
$3
3.6
$3
5.0
$7
.9$1
4.0
$4
.8
$8
.0
$3
7.8
$8
.8
$2
6.4
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13*
U.S. Insured Catastrophe Losses
*Through 6/2/13. Includes $2.6B for 2013:Q1 (PCS) and $5.32B for the period 4/1 – 6/2/13 (Aon Benfield Monthly Global Catastrophe Recap).Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01 ($25.9B 2011 dollars). Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B ($15.6B in 2011 dollars.) Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
2012 Was the 3rd Highest Year on Record for Insured Losses in U.S. History on an Inflation-Adj. Basis. 2011 Losses Were the 6th Highest. YTD 2013 Running Below
Average But Q3 Is Typically the Costliest Quarter.
2012 was likely the third most expensive year ever for insured
CAT losses
Record tornado losses caused
2011 CAT losses to surge
($ Billions, 2012 Dollars)
45
46
Moore, OK, Tornado: Media Coverage Was Generally Favorable
Industry had a highly visible, rapid response as Catastrophe Response Teams massed at the “Command Center” at the First Baptist Church in Moore within 48 hours
Developed good working relationship with OK Insurance Commissioner John Doak
47
Top 16 Most Costly Disastersin U.S. History
(Insured Losses, 2012 Dollars, $ Billions)
$7.8 $8.7 $9.2 $11.1$13.4$18.8
$23.9 $24.6$25.6
$48.7
$7.5$7.1$6.7$5.6$5.6$4.4
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Irene (2011) Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Tornadoes/T-Storms
(2011)
Tornadoes/T-Storms
(2011)
Hugo (1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
Sandy*(2012)
Northridge(1994)
9/11 Attack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
Hurricane Sandy could become the 4th or 5th costliest event in US
insurance history
Hurricane Irene became the 12th most expense hurricane
in US history in 2011
Includes Tuscaloosa, AL,
tornado
Includes Joplin, MO, tornado
12 of the 16 Most Expensive Events in US History Have
Occurred Over the Past Decade
*PCS estimate as of 4/12/13.Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments to 2012 dollars using the CPI.
Nu
mb
er
Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity)
Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire)
Meteorological (storm)
Hydrological (flood, mass movement)
Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – June 2013*Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – June 2013*)
*Through June 30, 2013.Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 49
41
19
121
3
50
100
150
200
250
300
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
There were 68 natural disaster events in the
first half of 2013
Losses Due to Natural Disasters in the US, 1980–2012 (Overall & Insured Losses)
52
Overall losses (in 2012 values) Insured losses (in 2012 values)
Source: MR NatCatSERVICE
(2012 Dollars, $ Billions)(Overall and Insured Losses)
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
2012 was the 2nd or 3rd most expensive year on record for insured catastrophe losses in
the US.
Approximately 57% of the overall cost of
catastrophes in the US was covered by insurance in 2012
2012 Losses
Overall : $101.1B
Insured: $57.9B
U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – June 30, 2013
57Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE
Average thunderstorm
losses are up 7 fold since the early
1980s. The 5- year running average
loss is up sharply.
Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent
producers of large scale loss. 2008-2012 are the most expensive
years on record.
1st Half 2013 thunderstorm losses total $6.325B; The
system that included the EF-5 tornado in Moore, OK, accounted for $1.575B
63
Top 12 Most Costly Hurricanesin U.S. History
(Insured Losses, 2012 Dollars, $ Billions)
*PCS estimate as of 4/12/13.Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments to 2012 dollars using the CPI.
$9.2 $11.1$13.4
$18.8
$25.6
$48.7
$8.7$7.8$6.7$5.6$5.6$4.4
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Irene(2011)
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo (1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
Sandy*(2012)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
Hurricane Sandy became the 3rd costliest hurricane in US
insurance historyHurricane Irene
became the 12th most expensive hurricane in US history in 2011
10 of the 12 most costly hurricanes in insurance history occurred over the past 9 years (2004—2012)
Outlook for 2013 Hurricane Season: 75% Worse Than Average
Forecast Parameter Median(1981-2010)
2013F
Named Storms 12.0 18
Named Storm Days 60.1 95
Hurricanes 6.5 9
Hurricane Days 21.3 40
Major Hurricanes 2.0 4
Major Hurricane Days 3.9 9
Accumulated Cyclone Energy 92.0 165
Net Tropical Cyclone Activity 103% 175%
Source: Philip Klotzbach and Dr. William Gray, Colorado State University, June 2013, accessed at http://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/forecasts/2013/apr2013/apr2013.pdf ; Insurance Information Institute..
72
Inflation Adjusted U.S. Catastrophe Losses by Cause of Loss, 1992–20111
0.4%
1.6%
3.8%4.7%
6.3%
7.3%
33.9%
42.0%
1. Catastrophes are defined as events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2009 dollars.2. Excludes snow.3. Does not include NFIP flood losses4. Includes wildland fires5. Includes civil disorders, water damage, utility disruptions and non-property losses such as those covered by workers compensation.Source: ISO’s Property Claim Services Unit.
Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, $161.3
Fires (4), $6.0
Tornadoes (2), $130.2
Winter Storms, $28.2
Terrorism, $24.4
Geological Events, $18.2
Wind/Hail/Flood (3), $14.8
Other (5), $1.4
Wind losses are by far cause the most catastrophe losses,
even if hurricanes/TS are excluded.
Tornado share of CAT losses is
rising
Insured cat losses from 1992-2011
totaled $384.3B, an average of $19.2B per year or $1.6B
per month
Homeowners Insurance Catastrophe-Related Claim Frequency and Severity, 1997—2012*
*All policy forms combined, countrywide.Source: Insurance Research Council, Trends in Homeowners Insurance Claims, Sept. 2012 from ISO Fast Track data. 73
Avg. catastrophe claim cost rose
approximately 200% from 1997-2011
Cat claim frequency in 2011 was at historic highs and more than
double the rate in 1997
74
Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2012*
Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO (1960-2011); A.M. Best (2012E) Insurance Information Institute.
0.4
1.2
0.4 0.
8 1.3
0.3 0.4 0.
71.
51.
00.
40.
4 0.7
1.8
1.1
0.6
1.4 2.
01.
3 2.0
0.5
0.5 0.7
3.0
1.2
2.1
8.8
2.3
5.9
3.3
2.8
1.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
5.4
1.6
3.3
3.3
8.1
2.7
1.6
5.0
2.6
3.4
8.7 9.
4
3.6
0.9
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
E
The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades
Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio
by Decade
1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 2010s: 7.20*
Combined Ratio Points Catastrophe losses as a share of all losses reached
a record high in 2012
Homeowners Insurance Combined Ratio: 1990–2015F
11
3.0
11
7.7
15
8.4
11
3.6
10
1.0 10
9.4
10
8.2
11
1.4 1
21
.7
10
9.3
98
.2
94
.4 10
0.3
89
.0 95
.7
11
6.9
10
5.8
10
6.7
12
2.2
10
4.4
10
1.7
10
1.2
10
0.7
11
8.4
11
2.7 12
1.7
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12E13F 14F 15F
1
Homeowners Performance in 2011/12 Impacted by Large Cat Losses. Extreme Regional Variation Can Be Expected Due to
Local Catastrophe Loss Activity
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2011);Conning (2012E-2015F); Insurance Information Institute. 75
Hurricane Ike
Hurricane Sandy
Record tornado activity
Hurricane Andrew
76
Federal Disaster Declarations Patterns:
1953-2013
76
Disaster Declarations Set New Records in Recent Years
Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2013*
13 1
7 18
16
16
7 71
21
22
22
0 25
25
11
11
19
29
17
17
48
46
46
38
30
22 2
54
22
31
52
42
13
42
7 28
23
11
31
38
45
32 3
63
27
54
46
55
04
54
5 49
56
69
48 5
26
37
55
98
19
94
74
043
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
*Through August 15, 2013.Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration; http://www.fema.gov/disasters; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Federal Disaster Declarations Is Rising and Set New Records in 2010 and 2011. Hurricane Sandy Produced 13 Declarations in 2012/13.
The number of federal disaster declarations set a
new record in 2011, with 99, shattering 2010’s record 81
declarations.
There have been 2,130 federal disaster
declarations since 1953. The average
number of declarations per year is 35 from 1953-2012, though
there few haven’t been recorded since 1995.
40 federal disasters were declared so far in 2013*
77
78
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2013: Highest 25 States*
87
78
74
67
66
60
57
56
54
54
52
52
52
51
51
50
49
48
47
47
47
46
43
40
39
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TX CA OK NY FL LA AL KY AR MO MS IL IA TN WV MN KS PA NE VA OH WA ND NC IN
Dis
as
ter
De
cla
rati
on
s
Over the past 60 years, Texas has had the highest
number of Federal Disaster
Declarations
*Through Aug. 7, 2013. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
79
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2013: Lowest 25 States*
42
40
38
37
36
36
35
33
29
28
26
26
26
24
24
24
23
23
21
19
17
15
15
13
11
11
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
SD ME AK WI GA VT NJ NH MA OR PR HI MI AZ MD NM ID MT CO CT NV DE SC DC UT RI WY
Dis
as
ter
De
cla
rati
on
s
Over the past 60 years, Wyoming and Rhode Island had the fewest
number of Federal Disaster Declarations
*Through Aug. 15, 2013. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
Public Opinion Survey
95
Industry Favorability RatingsPolicy Forms & Disclosure
Disaster Preparedness
95
96
I.I.I. Poll: Favorability
Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey.
36% 36%32%
28%
61%58% 56%
53% 51%47%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Auto insurance Homeinsurance
Life insurance Banking Electric utilitycompanies
Healthinsurance
Mutual fundsPharmaceuticalcompanies
Oil and gascompanies
Financialservices
companies
Percent of Public Rating Industry as Very or Mostly Favorable, 2013
Auto Insurers and Home Insurers Ranked Highest.
Viewed separately, auto and home insurers have highest favorability ratings of all industries surveyed
97
I.I.I. Poll: Homeowners Insurance
Q. Do you think that it is fair that people who live in areas affected by record storms in 2011 and 2012 should pay more for their homeowners insurance in the future?
Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey.
Nearly 60 percent of Americans believe that homeowners insurance premiums should not be raised as a result of recent storms in their areas.
4%
37%
59%
Don’t know
Yes
No
Public believes it is not fair to raise
premiums of homeowners due
to events they cannot control
98
I.I.I. Poll: Flood Insurance
Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey.
55%46% 47%
58% 61%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total U.S. Northeast West Midwest South
Q. The federal government plans to raise the price of flood insurance so it reflects the costs of paying claims. Do you believe this is fair? [% Responding “NO”]
More than one-half of Americans do not think it is fair for the federal government to raise its flood insurance premiums to better reflect claims
payouts.
Most people believe it is unfair for government to raise flood insurance premiums, even though
they are subsidized by taxpayers
101
I.I.I. Poll: Disaster Preparedness
Q. If you expect some relief from the government, do you purchase less insurance coverage against these natural disasters than you would have otherwise?
Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey.
Seventy-two percent of Americans would not purchase less insurance if they expect some relief from the government—but 22% would.
6%
22%
72%
Don’t know
Yes
No
More than 20 percent cut back
on insurance coverage in
expectation of government disaster aid
102
Growth Analysis by State and Business Segment
Premium Growth Rates Vary Tremendously by State
102
103
Direct Premiums Written: Total P/CPercent Change by State, 2007-2012*
58
.4
25
.4
24
.5
21
.0
19
.2
17
.6
16
.3
13
.2
13
.2
12
.4
9.9
9.2
9.2
8.5
8.0
6.2
5.8
5.2
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ND
SD
OK
NE IA KS
VT
AK
TX
WY
MN
AR
TN IN W
I
KY
MT
OH LA
VA
NJ
MI
SC
CO
MO
NM
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
*Data are preliminary as of 5/1/13 and do not yet fully reflect the impact of state-run pools and plans. Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
Top 25 States
Louisiana was a growth leader over the past 5 years even
though premiums written only expanded by 4.5%
104
Direct Premiums Written: Total P/CPercent Change by State, 2007-2012*
3.6
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.3
-0.7
-0.9
-2.8
-5.6
-6.0
-7.2
-7.2
-9.3
-10
.1
-11
.2
-12
.5
-17
.3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
CT
MS
NC AL
MD PA
U.S
.
MA IL
WA
GA
UT
NH RI
ID ME
NY FL
CA
DC
WV HI
AZ
OR
DE
NV
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Bottom 25 States
*Data are preliminary as of 5/1/13 and do not yet fully reflect the impact of state-run pools and plans. Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
115
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal
Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
115
116
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Stubbornly High, But Falling
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan00
Jan01
Jan02
Jan03
Jan04
Jan05
Jan06
Jan07
Jan08
Jan09
Jan10
Jan11
Jan12
Jan13
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
Unemployment stood at 7.4% in July 2013—its
lowest level in more than 4 years.
Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in
October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.
Peak rate in the last 30 years: 10.8% in
November - December 1982
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 14.0%
in July 2013
January 2000 through July 2013, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Recession ended in
November 2001
Unemployment kept rising for
19 more months
Recession began in
December 2007
Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment constrain overall economic growth, but the job market is now clearly improving
116
22
75
41
68
50
12
36
61
-79
24 6
8 74
51
2-1
14
-10
5-2
22
-21
9-2
03
-26
7-2
69
-42
9-4
84
-78
6 -70
1-8
21
-69
2-8
12
-82
1-2
88
-44
2-2
82 -2
22 -1
62
-23
3-3
4-1
67
-17
-26
17
01
02
94 10
31
29
11
3 18
81
54
11
48
02
43
22
3 30
31
83
17
72
06
12
92
56
17
41
97 24
9 32
32
65
20
81
20 15
27
81
77
13
11
18
21
7 25
62
24
16
43
19
15
4 18
81
87
19
61
61
11
1
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
Jan
-07
Fe
b-0
7M
ar-
07
Ap
r-0
7M
ay-
07
Jun
-07
Jul-
07
Au
g-0
7S
ep
-07
Oct
-07
No
v-0
7D
ec-
07
Jan
-08
Fe
b-0
8M
ar-
08
Ap
r-0
8M
ay-
08
Jun
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8S
ep
-08
Oct
-08
No
v-0
8D
ec-
08
Jan
-09
Fe
b-0
9M
ar-
09
Ap
r-0
9M
ay-
09
Jun
-09
Jul-
09
Au
g-0
9S
ep
-09
Oct
-09
No
v-0
9D
ec-
09
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0M
ar-
10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-
10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0S
ep
-10
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0D
ec-
10
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1M
ar-
11
Ap
r-1
1M
ay-
11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1S
ep
-11
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1D
ec-
11
Jan
-12
Fe
b-1
2M
ar-
12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-
12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2S
ep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2D
ec-
12
Jan
-13
Fe
b-1
3M
ar-
13
Ap
r-1
3M
ay-
13
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
Monthly Change in Private Employment
January 2007 through July 2013 (Thousands)
Private Employers Added 7.29 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.98 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.80 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were
the Largest in the Post-WW II Period
161,000 private sector jobs were created in July
117
Jobs Created2012: 2.247 Mill2011: 2.420 Mill2010: 1.235 Mill
-0.0
17-0
.043
0.06
80.
238
0.34
00.
434
0.53
70.
666
0.77
90.
967
1.12
11.
235
1.31
51.
558
1.78
12.
084
2.26
72.
444
2.65
02.
779
3.03
53.
209
3.40
63.
655
3.97
84.
243
4.45
14.
571
4.72
34.
801
4.97
85.
109
5.22
75.
444
5.70
05.
924
6.08
86.
407
6.74
96.
936
7.13
27.
293
6.56
1
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Jan-
10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
13
Feb
-13
Mar
-13
Apr
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13
Jul-1
3
Mill
ion
sCumulative Change in Private Sector Employment: Jan. 2010—July 2013
January 2010 through July 2013* (Millions)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Cumulative job gains through July 2013 totaled 7.29 million
119
Job gains and pay increases have added more than $750 billion to payrolls
since Jan. 2010
Private Employers Added 7.29 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.98 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.80 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs)
4-1
033
9251
128
798
-68
-224 -1
84-1
94-2
13-2
24-2
71-2
89-2
88-3
56 -324
-452
-449
-480
-488
-511
-530
-542
-536
-539
-547
-574
-565
-589 -555
-535
-592
-601
-606
-622
-609
-610
-621
-629
-628
-621
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Jan-
10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
13
Feb
-13
Mar
-13
Apr
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13
Jul-1
3
Cumulative Change in Government Employment: Jan. 2010—July 2013
January 2010 through July 2013* (Millions)
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/data/#employment; Insurance Information Institute
Cumulative job losses through June 2013 totaled 628,000
120
Governments at All Levels are Under Severe Fiscal Strain As Tax Receipts Plunged and Pension Obligations Soared During the
Financial Crisis: Sequestration Will Add to this Toll
Government at all levels has shed more than 625,000 jobs
since Jan. 2010 even as private employers created 7.29 million jobs, though losses may now
be stabilizing.
Temporary Census hiring distorted 2010
figures
122
Unemployment Rates by State, June 2013:Highest 25 States*
9.6
9.2
9.0
8.9
8.8
8.7
8.7
8.6
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.4
8.4
8.1
8.1
8.0
7.9
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.0
7.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
NV IL MS RI NC MI NJ GA CA DC TN IN KY CT SC AZ OR US NY PA AR DE OH FL CO LA
Un
em
plo
ym
en
t R
ate
(%
)
*Provisional figures for June 2013, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In June, 28 states had over-the-month unemployment rate increases, 11 states
had decreases, and 11 states and the District of Columbia had no change.
123
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.5
6.5
6.4
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.5
5.4
5.2
5.2
5.2
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.0
3.9
3.1
0
2
4
6
8
MD MA MO ME NM WA WI AL TX ID AK WV KS VA MT MN NH OK UT HI IA WY VT NE SD ND
Un
em
plo
ym
en
t R
ate
(%
)
Unemployment Rates by State, June 2013: Lowest 25 States*
*Provisional figures for June 2013, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In June, 28 states had over-the-month unemployment rate increases, 11
states had decreases, and 11 states and the District of Columbia had no
change.
125
US Unemployment Rate Forecast
4.5
%4
.5%
4.6
%4
.8%
4.9
% 5.4
% 6.1
%6
.9%
8.1
%9
.3%
9.6
% 10
.0%
9.7
%9
.6%
9.6
%
8.9
%9
.1%
9.1
%8
.7%
8.3
%8
.2%
8.0
%7
.8%
7.7
%7
.6%
7.4
%7
.3%
7.2
%7
.1%
7.0
%6
.8%
9.6
%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
07
:Q1
07
:Q2
07
:Q3
07
:Q4
08
:Q1
08
:Q2
08
:Q3
08
:Q4
09
:Q1
09
:Q2
09
:Q3
09
:Q4
10
:Q1
10
:Q2
10
:Q3
10
:Q4
11
:Q1
11
:Q2
11
:Q3
11
:Q4
12
:Q1
12
:Q2
12
:Q3
12
:Q4
13
:Q1
13
:Q2
13
:Q3
13
:Q4
14
:Q1
14
:Q2
14
:Q3
14
:Q4
Rising unemployment
eroded payrolls
and workers comp’s
exposure base.
Unemployment peaked at 10%
in late 2009.
* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (8/13 edition); Insurance Information Institute.
2007:Q1 to 2014:Q4F*
Unemployment forecasts have been revised slightly
downwards. Optimistic scenarios put the
unemployment as low as 6.5% by Q4 of next year.
Jobless figures have been revised
slightly downwards for 2013/14
Insurance Industry Employment Trends: 1990-2013
130
Overview of Insurance Sector Employment Changes*
*Data are through June 2013 and are preliminary (i.e., subject to later revision); seasonally adjusted.
Insurance SubsectorMay 2013
EmploymentJune 2013
Employment Change
P-C Direct 522,800 523,600 +800
Reinsurers 26,300 27,000 +700
Claims Adjusters 50,700 51,000 +300
Agents/Brokers 661,000 662,500 +1,500
Life Direct 335,500 335,700 +200
Health/Medical Direct 469,100 471,900 +2,800
Title & other Direct 75,300 75,600 +300
3rd-Party Administration 144,400 144,800 +400
All other insurance-related activities 63,300 63,300 +0
Net Total 2,349,500 2,356,200 +6,700
131
August 2013 Report:1-Month and 12-Month Changes*
P-C Insurers Employment up by 800 (+0.2%) vs. May 2013 Employment up by 4,800 (+0.9%) vs. June 2012
Reinsurers Employment up by 700 (+2.7%) vs. May 2013 Employment up by 1,300 (+5.1%) vs. June 2012
Claims Adjusters Employment up by 300 (+0.6%) vs. May 2013 Employment down by 1,200 (-2.3%) vs. June 2012
Insurance Agents & Brokers Employment up by 1,500 (+0.2%) vs. May 2013 Employment up by 4,000 (+0.6%) vs. June 2012
Life Insurers Employment up by 200 (+0.1%) vs. May 2013 Employment down by 13,000 (-3.7%) vs. June 2012
Health/Medical Insurers Employment up by 2,800 (+0.6%) vs. May 2013 Employment up by 10,200 (+2.2%) vs. June 2012
*Data are through June 2013 and are preliminary (i.e., subject to later revision).
135
Insurance Industry Employment Trends
For the last 15 years, total industry employment has stayed in a
narrow band of 2.29-2.38 million
136
U.S. Employment in the DirectP/C Insurance Industry: 1990–2013*
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Thousands
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
620
640
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
138
U.S. Employment in the Direct Health-Medical Insurance Industry: 1990–2013*
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Thousands
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
As of June 2013, Health-Medical insurance industry employment was up by 32,400 or 7.4% to 471,900 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs.
overall US employment decline of 1.6%).
139
U.S. Employment in the Reinsurance Industry: 1990–2013*
Thousands
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokers.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2013, US employment in the reinsurance industry was down by 400 or 1.5% to 27,000 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment decline of
1.6%).
140
U.S. Employment in Insurance Agencies & Brokerages: 1990–2013*
Thousands
500
550
600
650
700
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted. Includes all types of insurance.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2013, employment at insurance agencies and brokerages
was down by 15,200 or 2.2% to 662,500 since the recession began in
Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment decline of 1.6%).
141
U.S. Employment in Insurance Claims Adjusting: 1990–2013*
Thousands
40
45
50
55
60
Jan
-90
Oct
-90
Jul-
91
Ap
r-9
2
Jan
-93
Oct
-93
Jul-
94
Ap
r-9
5
Jan
-96
Oct
-96
Jul-
97
Ap
r-9
8
Jan
-99
Oct
-99
Jul-
00
Ap
r-0
1
Jan
-02
Oct
-02
Jul-
03
Ap
r-0
4
Jan
-05
Oct
-05
Jul-
06
Ap
r-0
7
Jan
-08
Oct
-08
Jul-
09
Ap
r-1
0
Jan
-11
Oct
-11
Jul-
12
Ap
r-1
3
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
As of June 2013, claims adjusting employment was down by 1,400 or 2.7% to 51,000 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (vs. overall US employment
decline of 1.6%).
Katrina, Rita, Wilma
142
U.S. Employment in Third-Party Administration of Insurance Funds: 1990–2013*
Thousands
85
95
105
115
125
135
145
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
*As of June 2013; Seasonally adjusted. Includes all types of insurance.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
The BIG Question:Where Is the Market Heading?
143
Catastrophes and Other Factors Are Pressuring Insurance Markets
143
New Factor: Record Low Interest Rates Are Contributing to
Underwriting and Pricing Pressures
INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY
144
Investment Performance is a Key Driver of Profitability
Depressed Yields Will Necessarily Influence Underwriting & Pricing
144
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2013:Q11
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.2
$53.4$56.2
$53.9
$12.8
$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13:Q1
Investment Gains Are Slipping in 2012 as Low Interest Rates Reduce Investment Income and Lower Realized Investment Gains; The Financial
Crisis Caused Investment Gains to Fall by 50% in 2008
1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B; Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment gains in 2012 were approximately 16%
below their pre-crisis peak
150
U.S. Treasury Security Yields:A Long Downward Trend, 1990–2013*
*Monthly, constant maturity, nominal rates, through July 2013.Sources: Federal Reserve Bank at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13
Recession2-Yr Yield10-Yr Yield
Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes have been essentially below 5% for a full decade.
Since roughly 80% of P/C bond/cash investments are in 10-year or shorter durations, most P/C insurer portfolios will have low-yielding bonds for years to come.
U.S. Treasury security yields
recently plunged to record lows
150
157
-1.8
%
-1.8
%
-2.0
%
-3.6
%
-3.3
%
-3.3
%
-3.7
%
-4.3
%
-5.2
%
-5.7
%
-7.3%
-1.9
%
-2.1
%
-3.1
%
-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%
Perso
nal L
ines
Pvt Pass
Aut
o
Pers P
rop
Comm
ercia
l
Comm
l Auto
Credit
Comm
Pro
p
Comm
Cas
Fidelity
/Sure
ty
Warra
nty
Surplu
s Line
s
Med
Mal
WC
Reinsu
rance
**
Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline
*Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums**US domestic reinsurance onlySource: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.
Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line*
157
1. UNDERWRITING
159
Underwriting Losses in 2011 and 2012 Are Elevated by High
Catastrophe Losses
159
160
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2013:Q1*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2012. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=108.1; 2012:=103.2. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.
95.7
99.3100.8
106.3
102.4
94.8
101.0
92.6
100.898.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120Best
Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out
Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned
Premiums
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Avg. CAT Losses,
More Reserve Releases
Higher CAT
Losses, Shrinking Reserve
Releases, Toll of Soft
Market
Cyclical Deterioration
Lower CAT
Losses Before Sandy
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975–2013:Q1*
* Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment
-$55
-$45
-$35
-$25
-$15
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1213:Q1
Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through
2012 is $510B
($ Billions)Underwriting
profit in 2013:Q1
totaled $4.6B
High cat losses in 2011 led to the highest
underwriting loss since 2002
171
Performance by Segment
171
Private Passenger Auto Combined Ratio: 1993–2015F
10
1.7
10
1.3
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
9.5
10
7.9
10
4.2
98
.4
94
.3
95
.1
95
.5 98
.3 10
0.3
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
1.9
99
.6
99
.4
98
.6
98
.3
99
.5 10
1.1
10
3.5
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12E13F14F15F
Private Passenger Auto Accounts for 34% of Industry Premiums and Remains the Profit Juggernaut of the P/C Insurance Industry
172Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2012E);Conning (2013F-15F); Insurance Information Institute.
Homeowners Insurance Combined Ratio: 1990–2015F
11
3.0
11
7.7
15
8.4
11
3.6
10
1.0 10
9.4
10
8.2
11
1.4 1
21
.7
10
9.3
98
.2
94
.4 10
0.3
89
.0 95
.7
11
6.9
10
5.8
10
6.7
12
2.2
10
4.4
10
1.7
10
1.2
10
0.7
11
8.4
11
2.7 12
1.7
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12E13F 14F 15F
1
Homeowners Performance in 2011/12 Impacted by Large Cat Losses. Extreme Regional Variation Can Be Expected Due to
Local Catastrophe Loss Activity
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2011);Conning (2012E-2015F); Insurance Information Institute. 173
Hurricane Ike
Hurricane Sandy
Record tornado activity
Hurricane Andrew
10
9.4
11
0.2
11
8.8
10
9.5 1
12
.5
11
0.2
10
7.6
10
4.1
10
9.7
11
0.2
10
2.5 1
05
.4
91
.1
93
.6
10
4.2
98
.9
10
2.1
10
6.7
10
4.9
10
2.1
10
1.4
10
1.3
10
2.0
11
1.1
11
2.3
12
2.3
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
F
14
F
15
F
Co
mm
erc
ial L
ine
s C
om
bin
ed
Ra
tio
*2007-2012 figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments.Source: A.M. Best (1990-2011); Conning (2012-2015F) Insurance Information Institute
Commercial Lines Combined Ratio, 1990-2015F*
Commercial lines underwriting
performance is expected to improve as
improvement in pricing environment persists
176
Commercial Auto Combined Ratio: 1993–2015F
11
2.1
11
2.0
11
3.0
11
5.9
10
2.7
95
.2
92
.9
92
.1
92
.4 94
.3 96
.8 99
.4
98
.0
10
4.6
10
7.1
10
1.7
10
0.3
99
.8
11
8.1
11
5.7
11
6.2
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12E 13F 14F 15F
Commercial Auto is Expected to Improve as Rate Gains Outpace Any Adverse Frequency and Severity Trends
177Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2012E);Conning (2012-2015F); Insurance Information Institute.
Workers Compensation Combined Ratio: 1994–2012P
102.
0
97.0 10
0.0
101.
0
112.
6
108.
6
105.
1
102.
7
98.5
103.
5
104.
5 110.
6 115.
0
115.
0
109.
0
121.
7
107.
0
115.
3
118.
2
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Workers Comp Results Began to Improve in 2012. Underwriting Results Deteriorated Markedly from 2007-
2010/11 and Were the Worst They Had Been in a Decade. Sources: A.M. Best (1994-2009); NCCI (2010-2012P) and are for private carriers only; Insurance Information Institute. 184
WC showed a better-than-expected
improvement for private carriers in 2012
Workers Comp Rate Changes,2008:Q4 – 2013:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Information Institute.
-5.5%-4.6%
-4.0%-4.6%
-3.7%-3.9%
-5.4%
-3.7%-3.4%
-1.6%
2.6%
4.1%
7.5%7.4%8.3%8.1%
9.0%9.8%
8.3%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4 12:Q1 12:Q2 12:Q3 12:Q4 13:Q1 13:Q2
WC rate changes have been positive for 9
consecutive quarters, longer than any other
commercial line
(Percent Change)
Note: CIAB data cited here are based on a survey. Rate changes earned by individual insurers can and do vary, potentially substantially.
2. SURPLUS/CAPITAL/CAPACITY
199
How Will Large Catastrophe Losses Impact Capacity?
199
201
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2013:Q1
Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$544.8
$559.2 $559.1
$538.6
$550.3
$567.8
$583.5$586.9
$607.7
$570.7$566.5
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
$520
$540
$560
$580
$600
$620
06:Q407:Q107:Q207:Q307:Q408:Q108:Q208:Q308:Q409:Q109:Q209:Q309:Q410:Q110:Q210:Q310:Q411:Q111:Q211:Q311:Q412:Q112:Q212:Q312:Q413:Q1
2007:Q3Pre-Crisis Peak
Surplus as of 3/31/13 stood at a record high $607.7B
*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010.
The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.80
of NPW, close to the strongest claims-paying
status in its history.
Drop due to near-record 2011 CAT losses
The P/C Insurance Industry Both Entered and Emerged from the 2012 Hurricane
Season Very Strong Financially.
202
U.S. INSURANCE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, 2002-2012 (1)
$9,704
$59,925
$14,878
$50,793
$43,022
$50,417
$31,435
$14,373
$46,509
$54,724
$43,152
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tra
ns
ac
tio
n v
alu
es
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Nu
mb
er o
f tran
sa
ctio
ns
($ Millions)
(1) Includes transactions where a U.S. company was the acquirer and/or the target.
Source: Conning proprietary database.
M&A activity has returned to its pre-crisis levels.
203
3. REINSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS
Ample Capacity Despite Heavy Global
Catastrophe Activity in Recent Years
203
Change in Global Reinsurer Capital
Reinsurance Capital Is at a Record High
Source: Reinsurance Association of America from company reports and Aon Benfield Analytics.
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1Q1360
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
US
D b
n
Soft market
Hard market
Hard market softening
Crisis
Excess capital
Long-Term Evolution of Shareholders’ Funds for the Guy Carpenter Global Reinsurance Composite
Source: Guy Carpenter
208
CATASTROPHE BONDS, ANNUAL RISK CAPITAL ISSUED, 2002-2012
$2.73
$3.39
$4.60
$3.86
$5.85
$1.22$1.73
$1.14
$1.99
$4.69
$7.00
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: GC Securities and Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC.
($ Billions)
Note
4. RENEWED PRICING DISCIPLINE
210
Evidence of a Broad and Sustained Shift in Pricing
210
212
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1213
:Q1
Net Premium Growth: Annual Change, 1971—2013:Q1
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline
Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
2013:Q1 = 4.1%
2012 growth was +4.3%
213
P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter
Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Sustained Growth in Written Premiums(vs. the same quarter, prior year) Will Continue through 2013
10.2
%15
.1%
16.8
%16
.7%
12.5
%10
.1%
9.7%
7.8%
7.2%
5.6%
2.9%
5.5%
-4.6
%-4
.1%
-5.8
%-1
.6%
10.3
%10
.2% 13
.4%
6.6%
-1.6
%2.
1%0.
0%-1
.9%
0.5%
-1.8
%-0
.7%
-4.4
%-3
.7%
-5.3
%-5
.2%
-1.4
%-1
.3%
1.3% 2.
3%1.
7% 3.5%
1.6%
4.1%
3.8%
3.0% 4.
2% 5.1%
4.8%
4.1%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2002
:Q1
2002
:Q2
2002
:Q3
2002
:Q4
2003
:Q1
2003
:Q2
2003
:Q3
2003
:Q4
2004
:Q1
2004
:Q2
2004
:Q3
2004
:Q4
2005
:Q1
2005
:Q2
2005
:Q3
2005
:Q4
2006
:Q1
2006
:Q2
2006
:Q3
2006
:Q4
2007
:Q1
2007
:Q2
2007
:Q3
2007
:Q4
2008
:Q1
2008
:Q2
2008
:Q3
2008
:Q4
2009
:Q1
2009
:Q2
2009
:Q3
2009
:Q4
2010
:Q1
2010
:Q2
2010
:Q3
2010
:Q4
2011
:Q1
2011
:Q2
2011
:Q3
2011
:Q4
2012
:Q1
2012
:Q2
2012
:Q3
2012
:Q4
2013
:Q1
Premium growth in Q1 2013 was up 4.1% over Q1 2012, marking the
12th consecutive quarter of growth
215
Average Commercial Rate Change,All Lines, (1Q:2004–2Q:2013)
-3.2
%-5
.9%
-7.0
%-9
.4%
-9.7
%-8
.2%
-4.6
% -2.7
%-3
.0%
-5.3
%-9
.6%
-11
.3%
-11
.8%
-13
.3%
-12
.0%
-13
.5%
-12
.9%
-11
.0%
-6.4
%-5
.1%
-4.9
%-5
.8%
-5.6
%-5
.3%
-6.4
%-5
.2%
-5.4
% -2.9
%
2.7
% 4.4
%4
.3%
3.9
%5
.0%
5.2
%4
.3%
-0.1
% 0.9
%
-0.1
%
-16%
-11%
-6%
-1%
4%
9%
1Q
04
2Q
04
3Q
04
4Q
04
1Q
05
2Q
05
3Q
05
4Q
05
1Q
06
2Q
06
3Q
06
4Q
06
1Q
07
2Q
07
3Q
07
4Q
07
1Q
08
2Q
08
3Q
08
4Q
08
1Q
09
2Q
09
3Q
09
4Q
09
1Q
10
2Q
10
3Q
10
4Q
10
1Q
11
2Q
11
3Q
11
4Q
11
1Q
12
2Q
12
3Q
12
4Q
12
1Q
13
2Q
13
Note: CIAB data cited here are based on a survey. Rate changes earned by individual insurers can and do vary, potentially substantially.
Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute
KRW Effect
Pricing as of Q2:2013 was positive for the89th consecutive
quarter. Gains are likely to continue through 2013.
(Percent)
Q2 2011 marked the last of 30th
consecutive quarter of price declines
216
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2013:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Barclay’s Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
Note: CIAB data cited here are based on a survey. Rate changes earned by individual insurers can and do vary, potentially substantially.
Percentage Change (%)
Pricing turned positive in Q3:2011, the first increase in
nearly 8 years; Q2:2013 renewals were up 4.3%. Some insurers posted
stronger numbers.
Pricing Turned Negative in Early
2004 and Remained that
way for 7 ½ years
Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5%
Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%
KRW : No Lasting Impact
217
Cumulative Qtrly. Commercial Rate Changes, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2013:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Barclay’s Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
Note: CIAB data cited here are based on a survey. Rate changes earned by individual insurers can and do vary, potentially substantially.
1999:Q4 = 100Despite 8 consecutive quarters
of gains (Q2:2013 = 4.3%), pricing today is where is was in
late 2001 (around 9/11), suggesting additional rate need going forward, esp. in light of
record low interest rates
220
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Line: 2013:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Major Commercial Lines Renewed Uniformly Upward in Q2:2013 for the 8th Consecutive Quarter; Property Lines & Workers Comp Leading the Way; Cat
Losses and Low Interest Rates Provide Momentum Going Forward
Percentage Change (%)
5.4%5.9% 5.9%
8.3%
1.1%
3.5% 3.6% 3.7%4.6% 4.5%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
Su
rety
Ge
ne
ral
Lia
bili
ty
Bu
sin
ess
Inte
rru
ptio
n
Um
bre
lla
Co
mm
erc
ial
Au
to
Co
nst
ruct
ion
EP
L
D&
O
Co
mm
erc
ial
Pro
pe
rty
Wo
rke
rsC
om
p
Workers Comp rate increases are large than any other line, followed
by Property lines
Note: CIAB data cited here are based on a survey. Rate changes earned by individual insurers can and do vary, potentially substantially.
Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment
223
Is the Tort PendulumSwinging Against Insurers?
223
224
Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical, 1980-2013E
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12E
To
rt S
ys
tem
Co
sts
1.50%
1.75%
2.00%
2.25%
2.50%
To
rt Co
sts
as
% o
f GD
P
Tort Sytem Costs Tort Costs as % of GDP
($ Billions)
Sources: Towers Watson, 2011 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A
Tort costs in dollar terms have remained high but relatively stable
since the mid-2000s., but are down substantially as a share of GDP
Deepwater Horizon Spike
in 2010
1.68% of GDP in 2013
2.21% of GDP in 2003
= pre-tort reform peak
Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2012
Best States
1. Delaware
2. Nebraska
3. Wyoming
4. Minnesota
5. Kansas
6. Idaho
7. Virginia
8. North Dakota
9. Utah
10. Iowa
Worst States
41. Florida
42. Oklahoma
43. Alabama
44. New Mexico
45. Montana
46. Illinois
47. California
48. Mississippi
49. Louisiana
50. West Virginia
Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2012 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute.
New in 2012
Wyoming Minnesota Kansas Idaho
Drop-offs
Indiana Colorado Massachusetts South Dakota
Newly Notorious
Oklahoma
Rising Above
Arkansas
227
228
The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2012/2013
Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute
West VirginiaIllinoisMadison County
New YorkAlbany and
NYC
Watch List
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
South Florida Cook County, Illinois New Jersey Nevada Louisiana
Dishonorable Mention
MO Supreme Court WA Supreme Court
California
MarylandBaltimore
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwigDownload at www.iii.org/presentations
Insurance Information Institute Online:
243