PBL HEIGHT ESTIMATION IN MODELS AND OBSERVATIONS

12
PBL HEIGHT ESTIMATION IN MODELS AND OBSERVATIONS How good is PBL depth in the models? How we can verify it? - internal model parameter - no good measurements on regular basis After change to ACM2 + Ri Number (no fluxes) NAM: TKE scheme CMAQ: Critical Richardson Number (with fluxes) RADIOSONDES: Critical Richardson number (surface fluxes set to zero) Post VERIFICATION Ri CR = 0.25 (Vogelezang and Holtslag, 1996)

Transcript of PBL HEIGHT ESTIMATION IN MODELS AND OBSERVATIONS

PBL HEIGHT ESTIMATION IN MODELS AND OBSERVATIONSHow good is PBL depth in the models?How we can verify it?

- internal model parameter- no good measurements on regular basis

After change to ACM2

+Ri Number(no fluxes)

NAM:TKE scheme

CMAQ:Critical Richardson

Number (with fluxes)

RADIOSONDES:Critical Richardson

number (surface fluxes set to zero)

Post

VERIFICATION

RiCR = 0.25 (Vogelezang and Holtslag, 1996)

PBL Verification System

RAOB

BUFR format

Observations Model outputNAM

GFS

Grib Format

Forecast Verification System

PBL height

Statistics

PBL calculation

Profiler

Aircraft

TKE PBL

Mix Layer Ht

Ri PBL/fluxes

Ri PBL/no fluxes

CMAQ

800

1120

480

Eastern US

July 20-27, 2006

Central US

PBL Depth July 1 – Sep 2, 2007

Eastern USWestern US

TKE PBL

RI PBL

RAOBS

TKE, RI and MODRI PBL depth

TKE PBL is higherSome features exist only in TKE PBL

TKE, RI and MODRI PBL depth differences

CA: MODRI PBL is higher than RI PBL, and at some locationsIt is higher than TKE PBL

TKE PBLRI PBLMODRI PBL

TKE PBLRI PBLMODRI PBL

Over-prediction – low PBL?

PBL Verification for retrospective tests: July 20-27, 2006

TKE PBL

RI PBL

RAOBS

MX Height

Western US

800

1120

480

2000

2400

2800

1600

1400

1800

2200

Eastern US

TKE PBLoverprediction

Central US

12 hr PBL verification from launcher runs; Valid 00z

Oakland CA San Diego CA

July 20-27, 2006

TexAQS 2006

RAOBS:SHREVEPORT, LA

Profiler:Lonlview, TX

TexAQS 2006

(Measurements provided by Jim Wilczak)