“Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties
description
Transcript of “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties
![Page 1: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties
Diagnosis Report to Focus Group
January 25, 2006
![Page 2: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Overview
• Lawrence Group • Scope of Audit• Audit Methodology• Recommendations/
Findings• Questions/Feedback/Next
Steps
![Page 3: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Lawrence Group
• Founded in St. Louis in 1983
• Carolinas office in Davidson, NC
• Town Planning & Architecture
• Municipal, non-profit, and developer clients
![Page 4: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Lawrence Group Projects
![Page 5: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mooresville, NC Code
![Page 6: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Haynie-Sirrine Master Plan – Greenville, SC
![Page 7: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
General Development Guidelines – Research Triangle,
NC
![Page 8: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Active Living Assessment
![Page 9: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Concord-Roberta Church Small Area Plan - Concord,
NC
![Page 10: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Woodlands-Davidson, NC
![Page 11: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Belmont Reserve-Belmont, NC
![Page 12: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Project Scope
![Page 13: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Saluda-Reedy Watershed
“. . .non-point source pollution – sediment, nutrients and waste carried by storm water – is now the chief threat to these rivers. . .
It will take a concerted effort by
community leaders across the Upstate to effectively address the threats of non-point source pollution fed by rapid development . . .”
-SRWC
![Page 14: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Project Scope
•“. . . audit of paving requirements in the codes and ordinances of Greenville and Pickens Counties. . .”
•“Identify opportunities. . .to reduce the amount of impervious cover generated by new development.”
![Page 15: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Project Scope
![Page 16: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Ordinances Reviewed
Greenville County
– City of Greenville
– Greenville LUDO– Fountain Inn
– Greer – Mauldin
– Simpsonville– Travelers Rest
Pickens County– Central
– Clemson– Easley– Liberty
– (Pickens)
![Page 17: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Methodology
• Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations
• Based on “Builders for the Bay” process (www.cwp.org)
• 10 major categories; 36 factors
![Page 18: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Methodology
• Major Categories– Street width– Right-of-way width– Cul-de-sac design– Street drainage (swales v. curb
& gutter)– Parking ratios– Shared parking– Parking lot design– Parking lot landscaping– Sidewalks and planting strips– Driveways
![Page 19: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Imperviousness
Rooftops + Car space
![Page 20: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Transport-related impervious cover: 60-
70%(streets + parking
areas)
Roof tops: 30-40%
Imperviousness
![Page 21: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Street Design
![Page 22: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Local Streets: 20-24 feet• Could be as narrow as 16-
18 ft
Street Width
![Page 23: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• Minimum street widths
Street Width
![Page 24: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Street Width
• Local Streets: 20-24 feet• Cul-de-Sac streets: 22-28
ft– Could be as narrow as 18 ft
• Manufactured home park streets: 20-28 ft– Should be same as local streets
• Alleys: 12-30 feet (Greenville County standard is
good: 12-18 ft)
![Page 25: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Street Width
• Local Streets: 20-24 ft• Cul-de-Sac streets: 22-28
ft• Manufactured home park
streets: 20-28 ft• Alleys: 12-30 ft
(Greenville County standard is perfect)
• Collector Streets: 24-40 ft– Could be as narrow as 20 ft– Consider parking, bike lanes,
turn lanes
![Page 26: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Curb Radii
• 25-40 ft (Greenville County)
• Pickens Co: Not specified• AASHTO Guidelines:
– Local/local: 10-15 ft
– Local/collector: 15-20 ft
– Collector/collector: 15-25 ft
![Page 27: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Right-of-Way Width
• 40-50 ft; typically 50 ft
• Could be as narrow as 34-38 ft.
• Allow utilities in the street
![Page 28: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cul-de-sac Design
• Typical: 40 ft(Greenville: 41 ft; Clemson: 35
ft)
• Landscaped Islands: 8 of 13 allow
• Alternate turn-arounds: – Greenville: yes– Pickens: no
![Page 29: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Cul-de-sac Design
• Cul-de-sac islands: – Greenville Co.: typically yes– Pickens Co: typically no
![Page 30: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Open Channels/Swales
• Only Clemson, Easely, Liberty require curb & gutter on all streets
• Pickens County swales: < 2 dua; slopes “not excessive”
• Tom Schueler:– No slopes > 5%– Runoff velocities > 4-5 ft/sec.– Soils/climate don’t allow dense
turf– Water table < 1 ft below channel– No densities > 3 dua
![Page 31: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sidewalks
• Context-sensitive requirements– Based on street-type (Clemson)– Development density (> 2 dua)– Proximity to schools (1-1.5 miles)
• One side only generally• Alternate networks: 4/13
codes
![Page 32: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Sidewalks
Street-type based (Clemson):
Density-based (FHWA):
Street-type
# of units Sidewalk
Cul-de-sac 25 SF/43 MF One side
Access 25 SF/43 MF One side
Sub-collector
62 Both sides
Collector 125 + Both sides
Commercial areas: Both sides
> 4 dua: Both sides
1-4 dua: One side
< 1 dua: None
![Page 33: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Sidewalks
• Sidewalk width: typically 4 ft min
• ITE & FHWA: 5 ft min.
![Page 34: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Planting Strips & Trees
• 5/13 codes require planting strip
• 2-3 ft wide– 6-8 ft recommended for street trees
• No codes require street trees• Benefits of trees
– Reduce runoff volumes– Increase soil infiltration– Increase soil water storage– Reduce erosion– Shade prolongs life of asphalt; reduces
runoff temperatures– Shade: cars, pedestrians, homes– Improve air quality– Aesthetics (= increased property
values)
![Page 35: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Planting Strips & Trees
![Page 36: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Parking Areas
![Page 37: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Parking Ratios
• Wide variation in requirements
• Not based on reliable research
• Shopping Centers– 2-6 spaces/1000 sf in Greenville Co.– 4-5 spaces/1000 sf in Pickens Co.– 10 spaces/1000 sf for food stores in
Central, Easley, Liberty – ICSC: 4/1000 yields surplus 99% of
time
• Parking requirements waived in most CBD’s
![Page 38: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Parking Ratios
Recommendations to consider:• Use draft Greenville LUDO
model– Low minimums (2/1000 sf for
retail)– Maximums (use current minimums)
• Allow on-street parking to count
• Waive/reduce parking req’mts in all CBD’s and other mixed-use nodes
• Reduced minimums for transit service
![Page 39: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Shared Parking
• All codes allow except Clemson
• No incentives for sharing• 50 or 100% of spaces may
be shared • “each parking space may
be counted for each activity” (Central, Easley, Liberty)
• Greenville LUDO offers more complex/accurate formula
![Page 40: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Parking Lot Design
• Stall width: 8.5-9 ft• 2 rows & aisle: 60-64 ft
– 60 ft is adequate
• Compact spaces: 3/13 codes– Limited benefit
• Pervious Pavement (good!):– Wide variation: not allowed;
allowed; required– Pickens Co.: allowed but not
req’d– Greenville Co.: req’d for 100-
200% over minimum
![Page 41: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Parking Lot Design
![Page 42: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Parking Lot Landscaping
• Greenville Co.: All but Fountain Inn
• Pickens Co.: Clemson, Easley• Range of applicability:
– 1-60+ spaces; new and/or expanded
– Clemson, Greenville Co. extremes• Required planting:
– Greenville Co.: ~ 1 tree/10-20 spaces
– Pickens Co.: 5-10% of area• No required curbing: Good!• No biorention
encouraged/required
![Page 43: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Parking Lot Landscaping
Bio-rentention
![Page 44: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Parking Lot Landscaping
Bio-rentention: Wilmington, NC
![Page 45: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Driveways
• Clemson & Mauldin allow permeable driveways(all other codes silent)
• Residential Setbacks: 15-40 ft; generally 20+– Reduce front setbacks to 20 ft
or less
![Page 46: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Other Issues
• Minimum lot size– Consider minimum density
instead– Provide incentives for clustering
• Encourage Alleys in higher density SF (8+ dua)
• LEED-ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)
• Land use policies– Greater density = less impact
• Transportation Demand Management
![Page 47: “Pavement Audit” for Greenville and Pickens Counties](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022013004/568143b3550346895db03c73/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Next Steps
Questions/Discussion