Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

27
Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004
  • date post

    22-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    212
  • download

    0

Transcript of Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Page 1: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

25 March 2004

MICE at

Project Report

CERN Collaboration Meeting

29 March 2004

Page 2: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20042

Purpose of this talk

• Achievements

• Issues - not a MICE Review

– Technical Issues

– People Issues

– Money & Schedule Issues

• What we need to achieve this week

Page 3: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20043

Achievements

• Absorber Review– Significant – doing this right!– Considerable Effort

• Collaboratively successful US/UK/JP– Result - Highly Successful– Must not lose sight of Safety Issues

• Gateway Review (UK)– Survived!

• another hurdle to come ~ Oct?• US Funding Review (mid-May)

Page 4: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20044

Achievements…

• Tracker decision @ RAL

– Yet to be concluded with final reports

– Results in line with expectation

• New Collaborators from Daresbury

– Expertise + Facilities (no extra cash)

• Technical Progress Since last October…

Page 5: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20045

Technical Board

• Chair:– Drumm

• Cooling channel:– Zisman

• Detectors:– Bross– Palladino

• Simulation/Software:– Torun

• Integration:– Ivanyushenkov (secretary)– Black

• Safety:– Baynham

• Ex officio:– Kaplan– Blondel

7 meetings (1 abortive)Every two weeks by phone

Agenda & Minutes:

http://www.eng-external.rl.ac.uk/MICE-GEN/

“The Technical Board oversees all aspects of the experiment and infrastructure design, time schedules, construction, cost, installation and computing matters. It serves as an advisory body for the Executive Board.”

It will identify issues;

It should not try to solve problems during the phone meetings but delegate to the experts and later discuss their conclusions;

It will manage the change process;

Action List

Meet every 4 weeks after collaboration meetingSuggest this for Integration and Executive Boards too!

Page 6: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20046

Issues Raised

• Magnets– encouraged MG/PF/EB discussions– stay clear & optical configuration

• Cryo-cooler option– discussed; assessed; agreed to consider;– Will be a big issue at this meeting…

• Cooling Channel– No obvious big issues; is Hydride Bed a risk?

• Detectors– Shielding needs – exercised change control

• Integration Issues– Integration group – EB, PD, MZ, ABr, YI

Help separate integration from “local” issues• Alignment and Survey Methods

– Discussions between physics and engineering• Noted Issues of control, instrumentation and monitoring

Page 7: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20047

Magnets & Magnetic Fields

• Issues being examined:

– Coils

– Currents

– Forces

– Shielding - detectors/people

– Thrown into turmoil (blame Mike Green!)

• Not time to react to this situation…

Page 8: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20048

Cooling Channel

• AFC

– Schedule

– WBS, Costs

• Interfaces

– AFC – Cavity Module - RF

– Hydrogen - AFC – Tracker

…cryocoolers…

Page 9: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 20049

Cryocoolers• Issues are

– Central plant: Infrastructure cost £2M (loaded)• Absolute cost!• Devastates cash flow!• Bulk of cooling is in the transfer lines

– Cryocoolers: Part of equipment: £0.75M (loaded)• Compact, distributed, scaleable• Lower power consumption – less plant• Cooldown is long (unless)

– supplement cooling power with LN2– Meeting of magnet designers

• No decent; encouraged;• Need to look at Absorber cooling

– VLPC cryostat benefits• Cryocoolers appropriate for 8K

• Issue to be raised at Collaboration meeting– Introduce concepts– Get general approval for this as the new cryogenic baseline

Page 10: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200410

Detectors

• ToF – best placement

• Cherenkov– US– DS

• Calorimeter• Tracker – SiFi

– Interfaces;– Beam diffuser

Page 11: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200411

Integration

• Consider Details:

– Trivia – 220 V, 50Hz

– Pumps – can we standardise?

– Installation Plan

– Survey & Alignment Systems

– Serious (e.g.)

• vacuum chamber = pressure vessel

• Design reviews…

Page 12: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200412

Layout

• Best use of space in hall / roof

– Work in progress…

• X-ray shielding – access

– equipment

– people

Page 13: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200413

RF Issues

• Clearly this is more in the air than any other part of MICE :– How to provide 8 MW?

• including drivers, low level RF• HT supplies, controls

– How to configure ?– How much will it cost ?and– Who has the funds?

Page 14: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200414

Alignment

• What does MICE need?

– Bravar et al…

• Typical engineering standards?

– Lau…

• Typical setup alignment?

– Yury…

Page 15: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200415

WBS

• Is available on the web

– http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/wbs/98/summary98.mpp– http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/wbs/98/mice_wbs.html – http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/wbs/98/mice_app.html

• and a summary of costs:– http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/wbs/98/mice.xls

– All dated this Sunday morning…

Page 16: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200416

Milestones & Phases

• 2004:– ISIS Shutdown no longer on critical path

because of delays in funding…“ comfortable”Implies focus for RAL/UK activities

LBNL 2002 Aspirations

Page 17: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200417

WBSID WBS MICE Task Name Mgr Contact Duration Start ED? FC [£] Cost [£] cFC [£] Work est. FC EU est. FC US est. FC JP est. FC UK

1 1 MICE 1578 d 13/03/03 No £0 £16,030,417 £712,491 29,230.88 d € 7,026,252 $ 4,934,780 ¥ 67,062,769£ 6,963,745

2 1.1 Mice Integration PD YI 960 d 24/02/04 No £0 £0 £0 1,608 d

3 1.1.1 MICE into Hall 5.2 YI 960 d 24/02/04 No £0 £0 £0 528 d

4 1.1.2 Mice Experiment EB TB 840 d 24/02/04 No £0 £0 £0 1,080 d

5 1.1.2.1 Concept UB RE 840 d 24/02/04 No £0 £0 £0 1,080 d

6 1.2 Muon Beam Line & Infrastructure YI 1067 d 13/03/03 No £0 £4,550,310 £694,125 3,058.7 d £ 4,432,810

7 1.2.1 Beam PD 1054 d 01/04/03 No £0 £822,335 £252,625 1,520.7 d £ 822,335

8 1.2.1.1 Muon Beam Line 1054 d 01/04/03 No £558,235 £558,235 £199,750 511.5 d £ 558,235

9 1.2.1.2 Muon Solenoid 265 d 15/01/04 No £173,100 £173,100 £52,875 61 d £ 173,100

10 1.2.1.3 New target CB 641 d 01/04/03 No £91,000 £91,000 £0 948.2 d £ 91,000

11 1.2.2 Cryogenic Infrastructure TB 946 d 13/03/03 No £0 £2,161,700 £30,000 355 d £ 3,610,475

12 1.2.2.1 Muon Solenoid Cryogenic Infrastructure 946 d 13/03/03 No £422,700 £422,700 £30,000 165 d £ 422,700

13 1.2.2.2 Coolling Channel - Cryogenic Infrastructure 946 d 13/03/03 No £1,739,000 £1,739,000 £0 190 d £ 1,739,000

14 1.2.3 Hydrogen System TB 330 d 13/03/03 No £249,100 £249,100 £0 240 d £ 249,100

15 1.2.4 Civil Engineering - II PD 382 d 01/04/03 No £99,875 £99,875 £0 135 d £ 99,875

16 1.2.5 Plant & Services PD 325 d 03/01/05 No £605,125 £605,125 £317,500 165 d £ 605,125

17 1.2.6 Interlocks & Safety PD 160 d 22/08/05 No £58,750 £58,750 £11,750 42 d £ 58,750

18 1.2.7 MICE Support Infrastructure YI 145 d 29/10/03 No £316,075 £316,075 £47,000 225 d £ 198,575

19 1.2.8 ISIS-MICE Controls Interface PD 350 d 01/04/05 No £188,000 £188,000 £0 350 d £ 188,000

20 1.2.9 Vacuum Systems PD 100 d 01/04/05 No £49,350 £49,350 £35,250 26 d £ 49,350

21 1.3 MICE Cooling Modules MZ 1310 d 30/06/03 No £0 £5,609,911 £0 5,548.43 d € 2,938,360 $ 2,192,780 ¥ 56,192,741£ 1,983,700

22 1.3.1 Absorber Focus Coil Modules WL 1200 d 01/10/03 No £0 £1,659,223 £0 3,115.8 d € 2,938,360 $ 2,192,780 ¥ 56,192,741£ 1,983,700

23 1.3.1.1 Absorber Modules 420 d 03/11/03 No £455,723 £455,723 £0 0 d $ 315,120 ¥ 56,192,741

24 1.3.1.2 Focus Coils 1123 d 01/10/03 No £1,203,500 £1,203,500 £0 3,115.8 d £ 1,203,500

25 1.3.1.3 AFC Integration & Installation at RAL 660 d 26/10/05 No £0 £0 £0 0 d

26 1.3.2 Cavity and Coupling Coil Module DL SV 566.25 d 01/10/04 No £792,381 £792,381 £0 1,019.63 d $ 1,462,660

27 1.3.3 RF Systems RC 1310 d 30/06/03 No £2,871,001 £2,871,001 £0 960 d € 2,838,360 £ 780,200

28 1.3.4 Magnet Power Supplies MG 300 d 01/04/04 No £224,822 £224,822 £0 240 d $ 415,000

29 1.3.5 Installation and Integration SV 1 d 22/10/03 No £0 £0 £0 93 d

30 1.3.6 Installation and Integration - nominal 120 d 03/04/06 No £62,484 £62,484 £0 120 d € 100,000

31 1.4 Detectors, Tracker Solenoid & Measurement AB 840 d 30/06/03 No £0 £4,145,049 £18,366 16,071.75 d € 4,087,892 $ 2,742,000 ¥ 10,870,028£ 547,235

32 1.4.1 Tof project 621 d 01/01/04 No £282,023 £282,023 £0 0 d € 422,000

33 1.4.2 Upstream Cherenkov DS 405 d 29/10/03 No £4,876 £4,876 £0 378.75 d $ 9,000

34 1.4.3 Downstream Cherenkov GG 283.73 d 07/11/03 No £132,591 £132,591 £13,366 0 d € 198,400

35 1.4.4 Tracker Module KL 706 d 01/08/03 No £0 £3,287,949 £5,000 11,793 d € 3,467,492 $ 2,733,000 ¥ 10,870,028£ 547,235

36 1.4.4.1 MICE Tracker Solenoid PF 540 d 02/12/03 No £1,336,600 £1,336,600 £0 0 d € 2,000,000

37 1.4.4.2 MICE SiFi ME GB 706 d 01/08/03 No £1,951,349 £1,951,349 £5,000 11,793 d € 4,055 $ 1,899,000 ¥ 189,028 £ 27,235

38 1.4.4.3 TPG - R&D - nominal 435 d 01/04/04 No £0 £0 £0 0 d

39 1.4.5 CAL - nominal 658 d 30/06/03 No £260,099 £260,099 £0 0 d € 389,195

40 1.4.6 DAQ - nominal 435 d 01/04/04 No £146,270 £146,270 £0 1,260 d € 213,282 $ 7,000

41 1.4.7 SIM - nominal YT 435 d 01/04/04 No £0 £0 £0 1,260 d

42 1.4.8 Detector Perf Tests - nominal JN 435 d 01/04/04 No £0 £0 £0 1,260 d

43 1.4.9 Installation and Integration - nominal AB 120 d 03/04/06 No £31,242 £31,242 £0 120 d € 50,000

44 1.5 Slow Controls - Instrumentation & Monitoring 980 d 30/06/03 No £189,609 £189,609 £0 396 d

45 1.6 Oversight & Travel PD 1565 d 01/04/03 No £1,535,539 £1,535,539 £0 2,548 d € 810,960 $ 827,000 ¥ 10,681,000£ 520,000

46 2 Shutdowns etc 912 d 01/04/04 No £0 £0 £0 0 d

47 3 MICE Milestones 542 d 10/04/06 No £0 £0 £0 0 d

1 MICE29231 day

1.2 Muon Beam Line & Infrastructure3059 day

1.2.1 Beam1521 day

1.2.1.1 Muon Beam Line512 day £ 558,235

1.2.1.3 New target948 day £ 91,000

1.2.2 Cryogenic Infrastructure355 day

1.2.2.1 Muon Solenoid Cryogenic Infrastructure165 day £ 422,700

1.2.2.2 Coolling Channel - Cryogenic Infrastructure190 day £ 1,739,000

1.2.3 Hydrogen System240 day £ 249,100

1.2.4 Civil Engineering - II135 day £ 99,875

1.3 MICE Cooling Modules5548 day

1.3.3 RF Systems960 day £ 2,871,000

1.4 Detectors, Tracker Solenoid & Measurement16072 day

1.4.5 CAL - nominal£ 260,099

1.5 Slow Controls - Instrumentation & Monitoring396 day £ 189,609

1.6 Oversight & Travel2548 day £ 1,535,539

Page 18: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200418

Unordered Events

Critical

Tentative A

ssessm

ent – Need

s Disc

ussion &

Evaluatio

n

During th

is Collab

oration M

eeting

Page 19: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200419

Ordered Milestones

Tentative A

ssessm

ent – Need

s Disc

ussion &

Evaluatio

n

During th

is Collab

oration M

eeting

Page 20: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200420

Costs…MICE Cost Details - draft

Dated: 27/03/2004 20:48:07

WBS FC CC FC-US FC-JP FC-EU FC-UK WK WK-US WK-JP WK-EU WK-UK WK-US WK-JP WK-EU WK-UK who

Task GBP GBP USD JPY EUR GBP days days days days days USD JPY EUR GBP .

1 MICE

1.1 Mice Integration

1.1.1 MICE into Hall 5.2 - - - - - - 528 - - - 528 ... ... ... ... YI

1.1.2 Mice Experiment

1.1.2.1 Concept - - - - - - 1,080 - - - 1,080 ... ... ... ... UB+RE

1.2 Muon Beam Line and Infrastructure

1.2.1 Beam

1.2.1.1 Muon Beam Line 558,235 199,750 - - - 558,235 512 - - - 512 ... ... ... ...

1.2.1.2 Muon Solenoid 173,100 52,875 - - - 173,100 61 - - - 61 ... ... ... ...

1.2.1.3 New target 91,000 - - - - 91,000 948 - - - 948 ... ... ... ... CB

1.2.2 Cryogenic Infrastructure

1.2.2.1 Muon Solenoid Cryogenic Infrastructure422,700 30,000 - - - 422,700 165 - - - 165 ... ... ... ...

1.2.2.2 Coolling Channel - Cryogenic Infrastructure1,739,000 - - - - 1,739,000 190 - - - 190 ... ... ... ...

1.2.3 Hydrogen System 249,100 - - - - 249,100 240 - - - 240 ... ... ... ... TB

1.2.4 Civil Engineering - II 99,875 - - - - 99,875 135 - - - 135 ... ... ... ... PD

1.2.5 Plant and Services 605,125 317,500 - - - 605,125 165 - - - 165 ... ... ... ... PD

1.2.6 Interlocks and Safety 58,750 11,750 - - - 58,750 42 - - - 42 ... ... ... ... PD

1.2.7 MICE Support Infrastructure 316,075 47,000 - - - 198,575 225 - - - 225 ... ... ... ... YI

1.2.8 ISIS-MICE Controls Interface 188,000 - - - - 188,000 350 - - - 350 ... ... ... ... PD

1.2.9 Vacuum Systems 49,350 35,250 - - - 49,350 26 - - - 26 ... ... ... ... PD

1.3 MICE Cooling Modules

1.3.1 Absorber Focus Coil Modules

1.3.1.1 Absorber Modules 455,723 - 315,120 56,192,741 - - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.3.1.2 Focus Coils 1,203,500 - - - - 1,203,500 3,116 - - - 3,116 ... ... ... ...

1.3.1.3 AFC Integration and Installation at RAL - - - - - - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.3.2 Cavity and Coupling Coil Module 792,381 - 1,462,660 - - - 1,020 1,020 - - - ... ... ... ... DL+SV

1.3.3 RF Systems 2,871,000 - - - 2,838,360 780,200 960 - - - 960 ... ... ... ... RC

1.3.4 Magnet Power Supplies 224,822 - 415,000 - - - 240 240 - - - ... ... ... ... MG

1.3.5 Installation and Integration - - - - - - 93 93 - - - ... ... ... ... SV

1.3.6 Installation and Integration - nominal 62,484 - - - 100,000 - 120 - - 120 - ... ... ... ...

1.4 Detectors, Tracker Solenoid and Measurement

1.4.1 Tof project 282,023 - - - 422,000 - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.4.2 Upstream Cherenkov 4,876 - 9,000 - - - 379 19 - - - ... ... ... ... DS

1.4.3 Downstream Cherenkov 132,591 13,366 - - 198,400 - - - - - - ... ... ... ... GG

1.4.4 Tracker Module

1.4.4.1 MICE Tracker Solenoid 1,336,600 - - - 2,000,000 - - - - - - ... ... ... ... PF

1.4.4.2 MICE SiFi 1,951,349 5,000 1,899,000 189,028 4,055 27,235 11,793 73 49 - 11,670 ... ... ... ... ME+GB

1.4.4.3 TPG - RandD - nominal - - - - - - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.4.5 CAL - nominal 260,099 - - - 389,195 - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.4.6 DAQ - nominal 146,270 - 7,000 - 213,282 - 1,260 - - - - ... ... ... ...

1.4.7 SIM - nominal - - - - - - 1,260 - - - - ... ... ... ... YT

1.4.8 Detector Perf Tests - nominal - - - - - - 1,260 - - - - ... ... ... ... JN

1.4.9 Installation and Integration - nominal 31,242 - - - 50,000 - 120 - - 120 - ... ... ... ... AB

1.5 Slow Controls - Instrumentation and Monitoring189,609 - - - - - 396 - - - 396 ... ... ... ...

1.6 Oversight and Travel 1,535,539 - 827,000 10,681,000 810,960 520,000 2,548 - - - 2,548 ... ... ... ... PD

2 Shutdowns etc - - - - - - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

3 MICE Milestones - - - - - - - - - - - ... ... ... ...

Totals: 16,030,417 712,491 4,934,780 67,062,769 7,026,252 6,963,745 29,231 1,445 49 240 23,357 SY:,,,,,,,

Tentative A

ssessm

ent – Need

s Disc

ussion &

Evaluatio

n

During th

is Collab

oration M

eeting

Page 21: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200421

WBS

• Caveats:

– Schedule depends on funds!

– Includes no levelling in either staff or capital

– As long as we cut into ISIS this April/May; the beam line should not in itself become a critical task

Page 22: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200422

Importance of WBS

• Apart from justifying costs…

– The basis of MICE planning

– The analysis is the basis of you knowing that your resources are sufficient

– How do we measure progress?

– Information has to come from the collaboration

Page 23: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200423

Technical Reference Exercise

• As far as it got:

•  http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/accelerator/mice/tr/mice_tech_ref.html

• Control, Instrumentation, Monitoring

• Data Acquisition 

Page 24: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200424

Collaboration Meeting

• Tech Reference is not complete:

– To review what is presented;(clearly some late changes – magnets)

– To identify what is missing and who is charged to prepare it;

– To identify what is agreed (or not) as the baseline

Page 25: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200425

What Else is Missing?

• Controls, Instrumentation & Monitoring

• Data Acquisition

• Detailed WBS & Cost review

• Money!

Page 26: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200426

What Next?

• Important that each parallel session

– Considers its input to the Tech. Ref.

– What information is missing

• and who should generate it

– Does the information represent the consensus view of MICE?

– As a whole

• Does it hang together?

Page 27: Paul Drumm 25 March 2004 MICE at Project Report CERN Collaboration Meeting 29 March 2004.

Paul Drumm

03 Mar 200427

Executive board

• Review of base line by Executive Board

– Actions for next collaboration meeting

– Hopefully an easier task

• I’d like to thank everyone for all the hard work …