Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement...
-
Upload
jasmine-walsh -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement...
![Page 1: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Patient involvement in radiology research:Evidence from a systematic review of outcome
measurement in radiology
S Mathers*+, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*, J Proctor*+, R Chesson+
NHS Grampian*, The Health Services Research Group+
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
![Page 2: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What aspects of health care can be evaluated?
StructureResources, facilities,
organisational settings
ProcessIntervention e.g.
surgery, procedure
OutcomeChange due to
intervention
![Page 3: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
...a successful outcome, as defined from the professionals perspective, may not necessarily be regarded as a successful outcome by the patient.’
Wright, 1999
![Page 4: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Aim
To carry out a systematic review of literature to identify:• the prevalence, • use of patient focused outcome measures in
radiology.
![Page 5: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Using 47 key words radiology, diagnostic imaging, x-ray/
outcomes patient satisfaction efficacy outcome measures waiting times quality of care
Databases: Medline, Cinahl 1990-2003.
![Page 6: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Results
Citations reviewed 112
Patient focused outcome 22
![Page 7: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results
NO paper was found in which patient defined outcome had been used in radiology
![Page 8: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Patient focused outcome papers
Primary aim of research (n=7)
- role of imaging on patient outcome (n=4)
- comparison of interventional procedures (n=1)
- most appropriate imaging modality (n=1)
- long term consequences of radiation doses (n=1)
![Page 9: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Patient focused outcome papers
Secondary aim of research (n=4)
-all interventional studies
![Page 10: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusions
• Dearth of research into patient focused outcomes in radiology
• Lack of coherent body of work
• Reflects little patient involvement in radiology research
![Page 11: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Recommendations
• Outcome measurement should be embedded within the cultures of radiology and radiography
• Patient engagement should take place in developing patient defined outcome especially in the area of interventional radiology
• Value of patient focused outcomes incorporated into education, benchmarking and planning of health care
![Page 12: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Acknowledgements
The Royal College of Radiologists (UK)
![Page 13: Patient involvement in radiology research: Evidence from a systematic review of outcome measurement in radiology S Mathers* +, G McKenzie*, E Robertson*,](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051412/5515e5c5550346dd6f8b4f2d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)