PATHWAYS BETWEEN K-12, HIGHER EDUCATION AND

EMPLOYMENT: PATTERNS FROM OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

Dr. Josh Hawley and Dr. Lisa NeilsonThe Ohio State University

26th Annual MIS Conference| Washington, DC | 2.13.2013

OERC MISSION STATEMENT

The Ohio Education Research Center (OERC), is a network of Ohio-based researchers and research institutions, that develops and implements a statewide, preschool-through-workforce research agenda to address critical issues of education practice and policy.

Provide timely and high quality evaluation and research products for state, federal and private agencies as well as other policy informing organizations;

Maintain a research database that includes restricted administrative records in a secure environment, while also increasing researcher access to data;

Serve as a bridge to education practitioners, researchers and policymakers translating the needs of practitioners into the research agenda and research into actionable practice improving policy at all levels of education; and

Bring together diverse resources on education throughout the state to improve access to high quality knowledge.

2.13.2013 3

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

State Success Factors How do state level actions (e.g. policies, programs, laws) facilitate

success in Ohio schools? Ex: How have state efforts to create and support transformation teams

lead to better educational outcomes?

Standards and Assessments How are standards and assessments contributing to the success of

Ohio schools? Ex: Are teachers who are rated high on Student Growth Measures also

rated high on Teacher Standards on Performance?

2.13.2013 4

RESEARCH AGENDA

Improving with Data How can educators and policymakers effectively use data to

improve practice and inform strategic decision-making? Ex: to what extent are LEAs using data to improve student graduation

from high school and completion of college?

Teachers and Leaders What policies, programs, practices, and resources are necessary

to ensure that every Ohio student has effective teachers and education leaders? Ex: How effective are teacher residency programs at preparing effective

teachers?

2.13.2013 5

RESEARCH AGENDA

Improvement and Innovation What strategies and models are most successful in improving

schools and decreasing achievement gaps in Ohio? Ex: To what extent have innovative models such as New Tech or AVID

been effective at increasing student achievement overall and reducing the gaps between disadvantaged and advantaged student populations?

STEM Education Initiatives What are the impacts of STEM education on student performance,

post-secondary education decisions and the workforce? Ex: What impacts do STEM schools have on college entrance and

completion? How have disadvantaged and advantaged students been impacted differently by STEM school participation?

2.13.2013 6

RESEARCH AGENDA

Early Childhood Education What are the leverage points in early childhood that will positively

impact school readiness? Ex: To what extent have innovative models such as New Tech or AVID

been effective at increasing student achievement overall and reducing the gaps between disadvantaged and advantaged student populations?

Future-Ready Students What effect does infrastructure and programming have on the

state’s ability to reach college and workforce goals? Ex: Do dual credit (or advanced placement) programs increase student

retention in and completion of college degrees? How do high school programs and policies (e.g., counseling or testing programs) decrease the need for remediation in college?

2.13.2013 7

RESEARCH AGENDA

Comprehensive data (e.g., encompasses major state data sources)

System linkages (e.g., early childhood data to K-12, teachers to students)

Testing and outcome data (e.g., analysis of student and teacher level effectiveness)

Access to consistent and updated documentation

2.13.2013 8

STATE DATA SYSTEMS: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

2.13.2013 9

What is the economic payoff for educating college students? For the state For the student

Matched student records to earnings Linked the HEI student data with their Ohio earnings 1

year after graduation and 5 years later 1) Identified graduates 2) Extracted student data 3) Extracted wage data 4) Aligned timing of earnings to term of graduation

2.13.2013 10

DATA APPLICATION

2.13.2013 11

Natural Sciences HealthAgricultural Business & Production

Health (incl. Nursing, Dental, Medicine, Optometry, etc.)

Agricultural Sciences Sports & RecreationNatural Resources and Conservation Social Sciences and HumanitiesBiology Ethnic Studies

Physical Sciences Foreign Languages & LinguisticsArchitecture Family & Consumer StudiesComputer & Information Science Child CareEngineering EnglishEngineering Technology Liberal Arts/General StudiesMathematics Library SciencePhysical Sciences Philosophy & ReligionMechanics & Repairers (& Construction) Psychology

Precision Production TradesSocial Sciences (Economics, Geography, Sociology, Pol. Sci., etc.)

Aviation General Education (Life Skills)Physical Sciences, Technology Public and Other Services

Education Law & Legal StudiesEducation/Teaching ROTC (Military)

BusinessProtective Services (Criminal Justice, Firefighting, Security, etc.)

Business Management Public Administration & Services

MarketingPersonal /Misc. Services (incl. Food Service, Sports Officials, etc)

Communications & Journalism ArtsCommunication Technologies Visual & Performing Arts

2.13.2013 12

2.13.2013 14

2.13.2013 16

2.13.2013 17

Outcomes of higher education:1) Earnings by degree and subject 2) Match with chosen field

1) - Match wage data with industry codes

3) Compare to high school graduates

2.13.2013 18

NEXT STEPS

THANK YOU

.

connect@oerc.osu.edu | www.oerc.osu.edu