PATENT DISPUTES · 2016-01-29 · Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera, London Marie...

2
era.int LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENTS IN PATENT DISPUTES HOW TO MAKE THE BEST USE OF EU AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS? PATENT SETTLEMENTS, INJUNCTIONS AND FRAND COMMITMENTS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Trier, 7-8 May 2015 ERA Conference Centre Metzer Allee 4, Trier, Germany Organiser: Florence Hartmann-Vareilles, ERA Language: English Event number: 215D40 Objective The aim of this seminar is to provide patent litigators and attorneys with practical guidance on how to make the best use of EU and international legal instruments in litigation and mediation/arbitration proceedings. Key topics Litigating before the Courts Choice of courts and applicable law Domestic and cross-border injunctions Settlement of patent litigation and FRAND commitments Case management before the Unitary Patent Court and before national Courts Courts procedures over the EU Validity of no challenge clauses Using alternative dispute resolution Pros and cons of mediation and arbitration in patent cases WIPO alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in practice Who should attend? Litigators and attorneys specialised in patent law, in-house counsel, European patent attorneys, members of the judiciary and future judges before the Unified Patent Court (UPC). Speakers Axel Casalonga, Senior Partner, Casalonga & associés, Paris Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera, London Marie Courboulay, Vice-President, Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris Hermann Deichfuß, Judge, Federal Court of Justice, Karlsruhe Joachim Feldges, Partner, Allen & Overy LLP, Munich His Honour Michael Fysh QC, 8 New Square, London Sophie Lawrance, Senior Associate, Bristows LLP, London Jan-Diederik Lindemans, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP, Brussels Lilia Luchianov, Case Handler, DG Competition, European Commission, Brussels Ansgar Ohly, Professor of Civil Law, Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich John Temple Lang, Solicitor, Ireland, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Brussels Winfried Tilmann, Professor and Member of the Drafting Committee on the Rules of Procedure for the UPC; Of Counsel, Hogan Lovells International, Dusseldorf Travel to Trier: Shuttle services from Luxembourg airport to the ERA Conference Centre can be booked at special rates at: www.finkelgruens-taxi.de For further information Tatsiana Bras-Gonçalves Tel. +49 (0)651 937 37 222 Fax. +49 (0)651 937 37 773 E-mail: [email protected] Online registration: www.era.int/?124933&en Education and Culture DG Erasmus+ Programme ERA is funded with support from the European Commission. This communication reflects the view only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of information contained therein.

Transcript of PATENT DISPUTES · 2016-01-29 · Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera, London Marie...

Page 1: PATENT DISPUTES · 2016-01-29 · Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera, London Marie Courboulay, Vice-President, Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris Hermann Deichfuß, Judge,

era.int

LITIGATION AND

SETTLEMENTS IN

PATENT DISPUTES • HOW TO MAKE THE BEST USE OF EU

AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL

INSTRUMENTS?

• PATENT SETTLEMENTS, INJUNCTIONS AND FRAND COMMITMENTS

• ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Trier, 7-8 May 2015

ERA Conference Centre

Metzer Allee 4, Trier, Germany

Organiser: Florence Hartmann-Vareilles, ERA

Language:

English

Event number:

215D40

Objective

The aim of this seminar is to provide patent

litigators and attorneys with practical guidance

on how to make the best use of EU and

international legal instruments in litigation and

mediation/arbitration proceedings.

Key topics

Litigating before the Courts

Choice of courts and applicable law

Domestic and cross-border injunctions

Settlement of patent litigation and FRAND

commitments

Case management before the Unitary

Patent Court and before national Courts

Courts procedures over the EU

Validity of no challenge clauses

Using alternative dispute resolution

Pros and cons of mediation and arbitration

in patent cases

WIPO alternative dispute resolution

mechanisms in practice

Who should attend?

Litigators and attorneys specialised in patent

law, in-house counsel, European patent

attorneys, members of the judiciary and future

judges before the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Speakers

Axel Casalonga, Senior Partner, Casalonga & associés,

Paris

Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera,

London

Marie Courboulay, Vice-President, Tribunal de

Grande Instance, Paris

Hermann Deichfuß, Judge, Federal Court of Justice,

Karlsruhe

Joachim Feldges, Partner, Allen & Overy LLP, Munich

His Honour Michael Fysh QC, 8 New Square, London

Sophie Lawrance, Senior Associate, Bristows LLP,

London

Jan-Diederik Lindemans, Partner, Crowell & Moring

LLP, Brussels

Lilia Luchianov, Case Handler, DG Competition,

European Commission, Brussels

Ansgar Ohly, Professor of Civil Law, Intellectual

Property and Competition Law, Ludwig-Maximilian

University, Munich

John Temple Lang, Solicitor, Ireland, Cleary Gottlieb

Steen & Hamilton LLP, Brussels

Winfried Tilmann, Professor and Member of the

Drafting Committee on the Rules of Procedure for

the UPC; Of Counsel, Hogan Lovells International,

Dusseldorf

Travel to Trier:

Shuttle services from Luxembourg airport to the ERA

Conference Centre can be booked at special rates at:

www.finkelgruens-taxi.de

For further information

Tatsiana Bras-Gonçalves

Tel. +49 (0)651 937 37 222

Fax. +49 (0)651 937 37 773 E-mail: [email protected]

Online registration:

www.era.int/?124933&en

Education and Culture DG

Erasmus+ Programme

ERA is funded with support from the European Commission.

This communication reflects the view only of the author, and the

Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of information

contained therein.

Page 2: PATENT DISPUTES · 2016-01-29 · Avantika Chowdhury, Senior Consultant, Oxera, London Marie Courboulay, Vice-President, Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris Hermann Deichfuß, Judge,

Thursday, 7 May 2015

09:00 Arrival and registration of participants

09:30 Welcome and introduction

Florence Hartmann-Vareilles

I. LITIGATING PATENT CASES IN THE

EUROPEAN UNION: CHOOSING THE RIGHT

FORUM

09:45 Applying international private law to

European and Unitary Patent cases

Ansgar Ohly

10:30 Discussion

10:45 The optional jurisdiction of national courts

and the possibility to opt out from the

Unified Patent Court during the transitional

period: which law is applicable?

Winfried Tilmann

11:15 Discussion

11:30 Coffee break

12:00 Choosing between litigation and opposition

procedures after the grant of a European

patent

Axel Casalonga

12:30 Discussion

12:45 Lunch

Friday, 8 May 2015

IV. PATENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AND NO

CHALLENGE CLAUSES

09:15 The European Commission assessment

schemes for patent settlement agreements in

the life sciences sector

Lilia Luchianov

09:45 Discussion

10:00 Patent settlements and competition law

compliance: an economic point of view

Avantika Chowdhury

10:30 Discussion

10:45 No challenge clauses in the revised European

Technology Transfer rules and beyond:

implications for litigation and settlements

Sophie Lawrance

11:15 Discussion

11:30 Coffee break

12:00 Standard essential patents and court

inunctions in the high tech sector

John Temple Lang

12:45 Discussion

13:00 End of the conference

Programme may be subject to amendment

For programme updates: www.era.int

II. PATENT LAW DISPUTES: LITIGATION OR

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION?

14:00 Litigation versus arbitration and mediation:

• Pros and cons

• How and when to use WIPO Arbitration

and Mediation? Michael Fysh and Joachim Feldges

15:00 Discussion

15:15 Coffee break

III. COURT PROCEDURES AROUND THE

EUROPEAN UNION

15:45 Round table on court procedures in patent

invalidity and infringement cases:

Evidence, injunctions, damages

Germany: Hermann Deichfuß

UK: Michael Fysh

France: Marie Courboulay

16:45 Discussion

17:15 The cross-border effect of foreign decisions

on national preliminary injunction

proceedings: a judicial prelude to the UPC?

Jan-Diederik Lindemans

18:00 Discussion

18:15 End of first conference day

20:00 Evening programme