Pastoralism, Livestock and Growth in Ethiopia
-
Upload
futureagricultures -
Category
Business
-
view
396 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Pastoralism, Livestock and Growth in Ethiopia
Pastoralism, Livestock and Growth in Ethiopia
Regional dialogue on Stronger food security and nutrition in drylandand pastoral areas: harnessing the potential of the New Alliance
Addis Ababa, 10 June 2014
Overview
• Trends and drivers
• Challenges and solutions Pastoralist areas
Trends: domestic livestock trade• Pastoralist areas - main suppliers of livestock for the population
living within and adjacent to ~60% of Ethiopia• Suppliers of :
– 20% of the plough oxen – stall-fed cattle to high end butcheries – breeding stock for farmers, donor/government projects – and camels to mid-altitude farmers
• This contribution from pastoralist areas is often unnoticed at policy level
Export trends: foundation and driversLivestock-specific
National rinderpest eradication (to May 2005)
Generic Reversion to more liberalized trade environment (from 1992)• industry associations• domestic price deregulation• more liberalized foreign trade• streamlining bureaucracy for exporters• more liberal investment and labour lawsImproved roads and mobile phone network
Private sector facilities – abattoirs, holding grounds etcPrivate feedlots, increased market stratification
Livestock-specific
Robust pastoralist livestock production system, responsive to market opportunities (from 1920s)
DEMANDS PRICES
Trends in live animals and meat export, Ethiopia2005-2013
Year Live animals Value ($1,000) Meat (tons) Value ($1000)
2005/06 163,000 27,259 7,717 15,598
2006/07 234,000 36,507 7,917 18,448
2007/08 298,000 40,865 5,875 15,471
2008/09 150,000 77,330 6,400 24,480
2009/10 334,000 91,000 10,000 34,000
2010/11 472,041 148,000 16,877 63,200
2011/12 800,000 207,100 17,800 78,800
2012/13 680,000 150,000 16,500 68,000
Source: National Bank of Ethiopia
Amount of Ethiopian meat exported increased up to 2.3 times from 2005 to 2013cf. US beef exports increased 2.4 times in same period www.usmef.org
Recorded Exports of Livestock, Berbera (“from or through the Somaliland Protectorate”) 1927-1951a
19271928
19291930
19311932
19331934
19351936
19371938
19391940
19411942
19431944
19451946
19471948
19491950
-
500,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,500,000.00
Num
ner o
f ani
mal
s
2011-2013b
a Hunt (1951)b Somaliland Chamber of Commerce (2014)
Proxy data for Ethiopia’s informal exports
20112012
2013
• Between 1927 and 1950 Berbera exported ~ 3x more animals/year than Ethiopia exports today • Between 2011 and 2013 Berbera exported ~ 5x more animals than Ethiopia• Other transit routes via Djibouti , Puntland, Somalia and Sudan• Kenya is a terminal route
Policy issues • In 40 years trade policies have shifted from free market to command
economy and then to liberalized system• Strong progress in formal exports – but volumes and values still far less
than informal exports• General investment policy is skewed towards crop production rather than
livestock (e.g. see GTP factsheet)• The pastoral production system is performing well - but no substantial
investments in commercial livestock farms in non-pastoral areas
Critical issues: Coordination
Challenges• The mandate for live animal markets
has changed twice between the MoA and MoT since 2005 including a new live animal markets proclamation by the latter
• MoI in charge of export abattoirs; • MoA role is limited to production
and health aspects • The MoF sets VAT on livestock feed –
despite critical feed shortage• Federal – regional harmonization
Solutions• Develop a harmonized “joined up”
national policy for livestock trade• Assign clear leadership and
coordination role to one Ministry• Define roles of the new ATA Livestock
Team• Strengthen national – regional
coordination
Critical issues: LandChallenges• Large tracts of land for crop
production not livestock• Growth in the livestock sector can
only be achieved if there are commercial livestock farms that provide sustainable services to other livestock keepers (technology, fodder etc.)
• Such commercial farms also rely on pastoralists for supply of young stock
• Myths around ranches – poor performance in drylands
Solutions?• Make land available for commercial
farms in areas in proximity to pastoralist producers
• Raise awareness of limitations of ranches
Critical issues: FeedChallenges• Further growth in the sector
needs better quality and availability of animal feed
• VAT issues:– VAT is applied in principle on
value added products; livestock feed ingredients are products, the value of which has been degraded
– Livestock feed is used for adding the value of livestock on which VAT is applied
• Wide-scale use of safety net feed to feed livestock?
Solutions?• Attract investors to engage in
fodder, edible oil and oil cake production
• Regulate animal feed quality• Build on positive trend of wider use
of feed by pastoralists• Integrate feed policy into overall
livestock development and trade policy
• Remove VAT on livestock feed• Review food distributions in PSNP if
food is fed to livestock
Critical issues: Preventable livestock mortality
Challenges• Preventable disease-related losses
in pastoralist areas ~ 3.6 million animals/year
• This is > 5 times the number of animals exported formally
• Good progress with private veterinary services in pastoralist areas but key concerns over: vaccination policies and
strategies quality control of
pharmaceuticals
Solutions?• Strengthen capacity of federal
veterinary drug administration e.g. random testing of pharmaceuticals
• Support stakeholder review of vaccination policies and strategies, supported by epidemiological and economic analysis
• Strengthen institutional support to private services, including CAHWs
Critical issues: Regional tradeChallenges• Aligning national policies with
regional free trade policies of AU, IGAD and COMESA
Solutions?• Support economic analysis of
livestock FTA, especially potential forex gains
• Test the COMESA Green Pass system for livestock
• Revisit, adapt and expand experiences from the EXCELEX project
• Aimed to create a win-win formalized cross-border trade Ethiopia-Djibouti & Ethiopia-Somaliland
• Led to an agreements between Ethiopia, Somaliland and Puntland• Somali traders deposited a proportion in hard currency for livestock they purchase • Enabling the traders to move purchased livestock through official custom posts• The short life span of the project (2 years) did not allow the conclusion of a similar
deal with Djibouti and the deal with Somali traders was compromised over time
Lesser issues/misunderstandings• Market information systems – mobile phones far more cost effective in
obtaining information by market actors cf. “market information systems”• Market yard infrastructure – not critical or useful for stimulating supply
and demand in pastoral areas (Kenya, Ethiopia, Sudan)• Transboundary animal diseases
• Rinderpest eradication pivotal for Ethiopian formal exports of beef and live cattle from 2005
• Export earnings to 2013 justify investments in rinderpest eradication• But rising exports from 2005-2013 associated with limited change in status of
other TADs
Increased investments in “TAD control for trade” needs: • Prior economic analysis to show added value e.g. by accessing new markets?• Analysis of competitiveness• Analysis of risk e.g. changing private sector standards in importing countries
Thank you