Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters Based Control of PWM... · Description and...
Transcript of Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters Based Control of PWM... · Description and...
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1216
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Passivity Based Control of PWM Current
Source Inverters
Padmabeaula Aa, Josephine R L
b, Suja S
b Helen Catherine
c, Dhayal Raj
d
a Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering,PSNA College of Engineering & Technology,
Dindigul,India b Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India c Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ,Coimbatore ,Sri Krishna College of Engineering and
Technology, India d Department of Physics, Sacred Heart College ,Vellore,India.
Email: [email protected]
Abstract— AC power is generally used for various
practical applications. Inverters are capable of
producing AC output from DC input. Current
source inverters produce variable voltage output. If
the output voltage is regulated at constant level, it
can be used as an uninterruptible power supply. In
this paper, passivity-based control (PBC) strategy is
employed for single-phase pulse width-modulated
current-source inverters feeding a resistive load. In
this strategy, it is required to estimate the load
resistance and the inductor-current reference.
However, the estimation accuracy depends on the
inductance value when the load resistance and the
inductor-current reference are estimated using an
existing adaptive algorithm. The inductor-current
reference estimation is possible at the expense of a
constant reference function for the inductor
current. In addition, the design of inductor and the
sensitivity of the output voltage to the value of
output capacitor used in the controller are studied
extensively through the steady-state analysis of the
control method. It is also shown that even very
large values of the estimation error do not give rise
to significant change in the output-voltage
amplitude.
Keywords – Output voltage; passivity control; load; pulse width modulation; current source inverters.
1. Introduction
Generating clean AC power for household and
small business use is on the rise. Systems such as
Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS), AC power
generators, and active filter line conditioners are just
a few examples of power electronic systems that
make use of some type of inverter circuit. As with
any consumer application, economic concerns play a
large factor in system design. Power electronics is a
relatively new and fast-growing electronics, with
wide practical application. It is concerned with
efficient conversion of electrical power from one
form to another. To achieve high efficiency power
conversion, the active semiconductor devices
(thyristors, power transistors) are always used in a
switching mode in combination with passive
components (power diodes, inductors, capacitors and
transformers).
Power converters exhibit a wealth of non-linear
phenomena. The Pulse Width Modulated (PWM)
Current Source Inverters (CSIs) possess attractive
features such as regeneration capability when
supplied from a thyristor rectifier, short-circuit
protection provided by the inductor, and a load
voltage with low total harmonic distortion (THD).
As a result, they received a considerable attention by
the researchers [1]-[7]. In addition, the CSI drive has
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1217
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig.1.Schematic diagram of current source
inverter the ability to boost output voltages[25]. This brings
the possibility of another application for the CSI,
namely, as an uninterruptible power supply. Thus,
AC voltages required in certain utility applications
can be obtained from a low battery voltage in one
single power stage. However, the control of CSI is
more difficult compared to that of voltage-source
inverters. The prime source of non-linearity is the
presence of switching element present in all power
electronic circuits. Non-linear components (e.g., the
power diodes) and control methods (e.g., pulse-
width modulation) are further sources of non-
linearity. So a non-linear control technique should
be employed to stabilize the system. 2. Problem Description An inverter is an electrical device that converts
direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC).
There are three main types of inverters namely
Voltage source inverters, Variable voltage inverters
and Current source inverters.
In voltage source inverter, output voltage is
maintained constant and current is forced to vary.
Voltage source inverters are generally used to
regulate the speed of three-phase squirrel cage
motors by changing the frequency and the voltage. It
consists of input rectifier, DC link and output
converter. They are available for low voltage range
and medium voltage range applications.
The variable voltage inverter (VVI) uses an SCR
converter bridge to convert the incoming AC voltage
into DC. The SCRs provide a means of controlling
the value of the rectified DC voltage from 0 to
approximately 600 VDC. The inverter section
consists of six switching devices. Various devices
can be used such as thyristors, bipolar transistors,
MOSFETS, and IGBTs. The above schematic
shows an inverter that utilizes bipolar transistors.
Control logic uses a microprocessor to switch the
transistors on and off providing a variable voltage
and frequency to the motor.
In current source inverter, output current is
maintained constant and voltage will be forced to
vary. The harmonics present in the output is a
major challenge for designing the control technique
[14]-[18]. A current source inverter has a constant
DC current intermediate circuit. The current is kept
constant with a controlled rectifier and high
inductance reactors. The output frequency is
controlled by the inverter. The schematic diagram of
current source inverter is shown in Fig.1.
Current spikes, caused by switching, can be seen in
the output. At low speeds current pulses can cause
the motor to cog. Voltage and current waveforms of
CSI are shown in Fig.2.
Fig.2. Voltage and current waveforms of CSI
Control of CSI is difficult because the control
variable appears in both inductor-current and
capacitor-voltage equations. The voltage control of
such systems is possible at the expense of a lower
bandwidth than the current control. The lower
Current
Voltage
Converter DC Link
Inverter
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1218
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
bandwidth, however, slows down the dynamic
response of the system. The dynamic response of the
CSI system can be faster if a current controller is
employed.
Discrete time control strategies are based on one-
step-ahead control [3] and sliding-mode control
approaches [8]-[9]. However, response times of
discrete-time-based control approaches are limited
by microcontroller speed, which leads to
considerable distortion in the output voltage. It is
well known that the continuous-time control
strategies are much faster, leading to much less
distorted output voltage. A passivity-based control
(PBC) proposed in continuous time offers fast
dynamic response and exhibits an ability to regulate
the output-voltage variation caused by the load
perturbations. In this project, passivity based control
of current source inverter is achieved and the design
of inductor and sensitivity of the output voltage to
the value of output capacitor used in the controller
are studied extensively through the steady-state
analysis of the control method.
3. Description and operation of single-phase CSI
The main objectives of the CSI control system are
to produce an output voltage with low THD and to
force the inductor current to follow its reference.
The direct control of output voltage may lead to an
unstable system due to the non-minimum phase
feature of the CSI. Hence the output voltage is
controlled by tracking input current.
3.1 Single phase CSI circuit
Single phase CSI circuit is shown in Fig.3. It is
composed of a DC voltage source (Vs), an inductor
(L), a single-phase PWM CSI using four
unidirectional switches, and a capacitive output filter
(C). The load is assumed to be purely resistive (RL).
Fig.3. Single phase CSI circuit
The equations describing the operation of the CSI
can be written as
iss vVRidt
dyK
(1)
L
oo
R
vi
dt
dvD 0
(2)
where R is the resistance of the inductor, K denotes
inductance and D denotes capacitance. vi and io are
the DC input voltage and the AC output current
which are produced by PWM operation of the CSI,
respectively. The switching function is denoted as d
which takes values in the finite set {−1, 0, +1} and
acts as a control input variable.
The inductor absorbs the voltage harmonics
produced by the CSI and behaves as a current source
to the CSI. On the other hand, the capacitor absorbs
the current harmonics generated by the CSI and
defines a sinusoidal voltage across the load.
The control objective is to design a control law for
the control input d such that the output voltage is
regulated to the desired reference once the inductor-
current tracking is achieved. At the same time,
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1219
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
harmonics should also be reduced to the minimum
extent.
3.2 Non-minimum phase feature
Direct control of output voltage may lead to
unstable operation due to the non-minimum phase
feature of CSI. Current source inverter (CSI) has a
right-half-plane (RHP) zero in its control-to-output
transfer function [24].
This RHP zero causes the inverter output to fall
before rising when a step increase in command
reference is required (commonly known as non-
minimum-phase effect)
[13].In order to avoid the
unstable operation and eliminate the non-minimum
phase obstacle, the output voltage should be
indirectly controlled by tracking the following
inductor-current reference:
)2sin( tIIi HDD
(3)
where ID is a DC reference and IH is the harmonic-
ripple current.
4. Passivity based control
Passivity Based Control (PBC) is a controller
design approach with ‘energy shaping’. PBC yields
a closed-loop energy that is equal to the difference
between the stored and the supplied energies,
namely energy-balancing [10]-[12] .When a
passivity-based controller is designed a desired
energy function is first selected. Then the controller
can be designed to ensure this objective. This
energy-balancing property is clearly a universal
property of passive physical systems, including
nonlinear and time-varying ones.
4.1 Passivity
Passivity is a fundamental property of many
physical systems which may be roughly defined in
terms of energy dissipation and transformation. It is
an inherent Input-Output property in the sense that it
quantifies and qualifies the energy balance of a
system when stimulated by external inputs to
generate some output. Passivity is therefore related
to the property of stability in an input-output sense,
that is, we say that the system is stable if bounded
“input energy” supplied to the system, yields
bounded output energy. This is in contrast to
Lyapunov stability which concerns the internal
stability of a system, that is, how “far” the state of a
system is from a desired value.
Passivity based control is a methodology which
consists in controlling a system with the aim at
making the closed loop system, passive.
4.2 Passive system
From an energetic point of view, we can define a
passive system as a system which cannot store more
energy than is supplied by some “source”, with the
difference between stored energy and supplied
energy, being the dissipated energy. Hence, it shall
be clear that passivity is closely related to the
stability of a system, in the input-output viewpoint.
In PBC achieving stability from this viewpoint is the
first goal.
4.2.1 Fundamental property of passive system
A fundamental property of passive systems is that,
the feedback interconnection of two passive systems
yields a passive system. Thus, if the overall energy
balance is positive, in the sense that the energy
generated by one subsystem is dissipated by the
other one, the closed loop will be stable in an input-
output viewpoint.[23] This property constitutes the
basis of passivity-based control (PBC).
4.2.2 Energy shaping and Damping Injection
In terms of energy dissipation, the PBC approach
may be viewed as an extension of the so-called
energy-shaping plus damping injection technique.
An energy shaping stage consists of modifying the
potential energy of the system in such a way that the
“new” potential energy function has a global and
unique minimum at the desired equilibrium.
Damping injection stage consists of modifying the
dissipation properties of the system, to render it
strictly passive.
The energy shaping stage accomplishes a
passivation objective with a desired storage function
that consists of the original kinetic energy and the
new desired potential energy. The damping injection
reinforces this property to output strict passivity.
4.3 Passivity Based Control of CSI
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1220
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
The basic idea behind the PBC is to shape the
closed-loop energy function to a desired energy
function. After energy shaping, a damping injection
is needed to achieve an asymptotic convergence.
Let the error variables of the CSI system be
defined as,
Ds iiy 1
(4)
Do vvy 2
(5)
where iD and )sin( tVv mD are the internally
generated references for is and vo respectively.
The error dynamics including the damping terms,
can be written as
11
.
11211
.
ydviRiKVydyRyyK DDDs
(6)
22
.
22212
. 11yv
RidvDyy
RdyyD D
L
DD
L
(7)
where 1 > 0 and 2 > 0 are constants providing a
suitable damping injection and “ ˙ ”. If the right-
hand sides of equations (6) and (7) are set to zero,
we can obtain,
11 ydvRiKiV DDDs
(8)
22
.
0 yR
vdivD
L
DDD
(9)
11211 ydyRyyK
(10)
.
222
12
.
yR
ydyyD
L
(11)
The total energy of the system and its derivative are
given by,
2
2
2
12
1
2
1)( DyKytG
(12)
.
22
.
11
.
)( yDyxKytH
(13)
Substituting (10) and (11) into (13) and simplifying
gives,
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
11
.
)()( yRRyytG L
(14)
Since it is negative for all values of y1 and y2, then it
can be concluded that the error dynamics are
asymptotically stable. The controller can be obtained
from equation (9) by solving for d as
))((
1)(
2
1.~
DoLDDD vvRvvDi
td
(15)
Where ~
D is the estimated value of D.
The implementation of (3) requires the estimation
of Is sin(2ωt + θ) which increases the complexity of
the controller. In addition, in the case of unknown
load, the knowledge of RL is needed not only in (3)
but also for the computation of isd. Nevertheless, the
adaptive approach can be used to estimate 1/RL,
provided that its upper and lower bounds are known
[2]. However, since the value of L is directly
proportional to the estimation accuracy and
inversely proportional to the dynamic response of
the proposed controller, a compromise between
dynamic response and correct estimation for isd is
essential when L is being chosen. A remedy to this
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1221
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
problem is to ignore the harmonic-ripple component
and hence,
222
222
L
mss
DsRR
V
R
V
R
VIi
(16)
Therefore, once the estimate of 1/RL is obtained,
isd can be computed easily. The division by iD in (15)
can easily be accomplished by modulating the
amplitude of the carrier with iD.
6. SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section, the simulink diagram of current
source inverter and the obtained results are
presented. The effect of passivity based control on
current source inverter is clearly shown. The
response of current source inverter with and without
controller is shown. The existing control methods
and the passivity based control methods [19]-[22]
are compared.
6.1 Simulink diagram of current source inverter
The Simulink model of current source inverter has
been developed and it is shown in Fig.4. It is
simulated to obtain the response of current source
inverter and the response is shown in Fig.5. Then
passivity based control is implemented in the circuit
and it is shown in Fig.6.and the response obtained is
shown in Fig.7. It can be seen that the controller
makes the system output to be maintained at the
desired reference value. The controller switching
response is shown in Fig.8. The load current
waveform is shown in Fig.9.
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1222
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig 4. Simulink diagram of CSI
Fig.5. Output Voltage of CSI without controller
The non-linear response of CSI circuit is controlled
by employing Passivity based controller. The output
voltage is controlled and regulated at a constant
level by switching the input voltage accordingly
based on the variations in the output voltage. The
switching function maintains the input voltage and
output current in such a way that the output voltage
is maintained at the desired reference value. Thus it
is observed that the passivity based control provides
faster dynamic response and maintains the output
voltage at the required reference value.
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1223
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig.6. Simulink diagram of passivity based controlled CSI
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1224
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig.7. Output Voltage of CSI with controller
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1225
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig.8. Switching function
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1226
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
Fig.9. Load current
Thus this method in comparison with the existing
methods has more advantages which are discussed
as follows: In adaptive digital and sliding mode
control methods, discrete control is employed but
the passivity based control employs continuous
control technique. The parameters sensitivity in this
technique is negligibly small and the dynamic
response of the system is found to be good.
Realization complexity is less and the load
regulation of the inverter is better than the discrete
control technique.
7. CONCLUSION
A PBC strategy has been proposed for single-phase
PWM CSIs. In this strategy, it is required to estimate
the load resistance and the inductor-current
reference. However, the estimation accuracy
depends on the inductance value when the load
resistance and the inductor-current reference are
estimated using an existing adaptive algorithm. It is
shown that the inductor current reference estimation
is possible at the expense of a constant reference
function for the inductor current. Moreover, the
design of inductor and the sensitivity of the output
voltage to the value of output capacitor used in the
controller are studied and it is shown that this
method regulates the output voltage efficiently.
REFERENCES
[1] Komurcugil H, March 2010.“Steady state
analysis and passivity-based control of single-
phase PWM current source inverters,” in IEEE
Trans Ind. Electron.vol.57, no.3, pp. 1027-1030.
[2] Zmood D N and. Holmes D G, Jul./Aug. 2001.
“Improved voltage regulation for current source
inverters,” in IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 37,
no. 4,.pp. 1028–1036.
[3] P. C. Loh and D. G. Holmes, Mar./Apr. 2005
“Analysis of multiloop control strategies for
LC/CL/LCL-filtered voltage-source and current-
source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol.
41, pp. 644–654.
[4] Baronian A J and Dewan S B, May 1995 “An
adaptive digital control of current source
inverter suitable for parallel processing inverter
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1227
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
systems,” in Conf.Rec. IEEE IAS Annu.
Meeting, , pp. 2670–2677.
[5] Bor-Ren Lin & Der-Jan Chen, 2002
Development of a single-phase five-level PWM
rectifier for integrated power quality
compensation based on sliding mode control. In
International journal of Electronics, Volume
89, pp: 381-401.
[6] V.R.H. Lorentz, H. Schwarzmann, M. März
, A.J. Bauer ,H. Ryssel , L. Frey , P. Poure & F.
Braun, 2011.A novel PWM control for a bi-
directional full-bridge DC–DC converter with
smooth conversion mode transitions. In
International journal of Electronics, Volume
98, PP: 1025-1054.
[7] Ma H, Yu F, Du L, Chen Y, Jan 2009 “Discrete-
time passivity-based sliding-mode control of
single-phase current-source inverter”, in
Conf.Rec. IEEE IAS Annu. Meeting,.pp. 403-
407.
[8] Yu F, Ma H, and Zhang Y, Feb 2006. “A
discrete-time sliding mode controlled current-
source inverter used in AC power source,” in
Proc. IEEE PESC, pp. 1–5.
[9] C. Cecati, A. Dell’Aquila, M. Liserre, and V. G.
Monopoli, Sep./Oct. 2003. “A passivity based
multilevel active rectifier with adaptive
compensation for traction applications,” IEEE
Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1404–1413.
[10] Li R T H, Chung H S H, and. Chan T K M, Jul.
2007. “An active modulation techniques for
single-phase grid-connected CSI,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1373–1382.
[11] S. Wahsh & M. El-Bakry, July 1989, New
PWM method giving minimum harmonic
content, International journal of Electronics,
Volume 67, pp 43-52.
[12] Li Y W, May 2009 “Control and resonance
damping of voltage-source and current source
converters with LC filters,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 56, pp. 1511–1521.
[13] K. A. Mohammed, S. Isobe & M. Takemoto,
February 1990, Linear pulse width modulation
method for optimum minimization of
harmonics in microprocessor-based voltage-
inverters, International journal of Electronic,
Volume 68, pp 309-322.
[14] Tomonobu Senjyu, February 1996, Robust
current control method with a disturbance
voltage observer for a voltage source PWM
inverter, International journal of
Electronics,Volume 80, pp 365-375.
[15] Pekik argo Dahono, February 1996, Analysis of
ripple components of the input current and
voltage of PWM inverters, International journal
of Electronics, Volume 80, pp.265-276.
[16] Yong-Chae Jung, August 1996, Low-loss quasi-
parallel resonant DC link inverter with
advanced PWM capability, International
journal of Electronics, Volume 81, pp 219-234.
[17] Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski, Stanislaw
Legowski & R. Lynn Kirlin, June 1990,
Random pulse-width modulation technique for
voltage-controlled power inverters,
International journal of Electronics. Volume
68, pp 1027-1037.
[18] Yin Y and Wu A Y, “A low-harmonic electric
drive system based on current-source inverter,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, Jan./Feb.
1998. pp. 227– 235.
[19] Kwak S and Toliyat H A, “Multilevel converter
topology using two types of current-source
inverters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 42, no.
6, Nov./Dec. 2006. pp. 1558–1564.
[20] Suh Y, Steinke J K, and Steimer P K,
“Efficiency comparison of voltage-source and
current-source drive systems for medium
voltage applications IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 54, no. 5, Oct. 2007 pp. 2521–2531.
[21] Li Y W, “Control and resonance damping of
voltage-source and current source converters
with LC filters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 56,no. 5, May 2009.pp. 1511–1521.
[22] Li R T H, Chung H S H, and. Chan T K M,
“An active modulation techniques for single-
phase grid-connected CSI,” IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 22, no. 4, Jul. 2007. pp. 1373–
1382.
[23] Cancelliere P, Colli V D, Stefano R D, and
Marignetti F, “Modeling and control of a zero-
current-switching DC/AC current-source
inverter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54,
no. 4, , Aug 2007.pp. 2106–2119.
[24] Shiriaev A, Pogromsky A, Ludvigsen H and
Egeland O, “On global properties of passivity-
based control of an inverted pendulum”, in Int.
International Electrical Engineering Journal (IEEJ)
Vol. 5 (2014) No. 1, pp. 1216-1228
ISSN 2078-2365
http://www.ieejournal.com/
1228
Padmabeaula et. al., Passivity Based Control of PWM Current Source Inverters
J. Robust Nonlinear Control; vol 10,May 2000.
pp.283-300.
[25] J. R. Espinoza and G. Joos, “A current-source-
inverter-fed induction motor drive system with
reduced losses,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol.
34, no. 4, pp. 796–805, Jul./Aug. 1998.
[26] M. Kazerani, Z. C. Zhang, and B. T. Ooi, Feb.
1995.“Linearly controllable boost voltages from
tri-level PWM current-source inverter,” IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 72–77.