Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

29
Partnering with Your Local Government Why so Tough? Craiglist Boot Camp 2011 Ed Everett: Senior Fellow Davenport Institute

description

Ed Everett, community engagement coach, Ed Everett ConsultingIn today’s environment the public and government most often are at odds with each other. However, the current economic realities combined with the complex problems we face means separation between citizens, business and local government is a major liability for all players. Partnering between the public, business and local government is not an “interesting concept” or “nice vision,” but rather an essential reality we must achieve. In this session you will learn:* Why this separation between citizens and local government exits* How the public and government contribute to this separation* A different model for partnering* What true civic engagement really means* Why community building is more important now than ever

Transcript of Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Page 1: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Partnering with Your Local Government

Why so Tough?

Craiglist Boot Camp

2011Ed Everett: Senior Fellow

Davenport Institute

Page 2: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Why the Separation?

• Mistrust of govt.• Anti-govt. mood• Local govt. has pretended to engage the

public without letting go of control• Public acts as Customers not Citizens • No feeling of community• Business and local govt. tend to ignore each

other

Page 3: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

How all Parties Contribute to this

Separation.

• Staff and electeds have a negative attitude of the public and some businesses.

• Public has negative attitude of govt.• Business has negative attitude of govt.• What psychologists tell us about changing

our behavior.• We are a siloed society.

Page 4: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Public acts as Customers vs.. Citizens

Page 5: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

A Quick Historical Overview: Citizen/Gov’t Relations

Page 6: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

“Customer” Characteristics:

• Give away power

• Allow others to define their needs

• Consumers not creators or problem solvers

• Think in terms of “I”/”me”

• Entitlement mentality

Page 7: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

“Citizen” Characteristics:

• Accountable• Committed• Determines the future• Exercises ownership• Acknowledges change through citizens

Page 8: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Citizens can and will partner.

Customers are unable and won’t partner.

Page 9: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Govt. not Understanding Its True Role

Page 10: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Old Model “Stakeholders”

Page 11: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Partnership Model

Page 12: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

No Feeling of Community

Page 13: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

It is much easier to form partnerships between citizens and government when citizens feel part of a community.

Page 14: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Community is defined by 4 feelings:

1. Belonging

2. Pride

3. Inclusion

4. Not being alone

Page 15: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

What do we actually know about community?

A Decrease in:

• Membership of service clubs, PTA’S, unions,

national organizations and church attendance

• Volunteer hours (may be increasing)

• Whether we think we can trust people

• Attending a public meeting or School Affairs

• Having friends over to your house for dinner or

going to friends house for dinner

*Robert Putman - Bowling Alone

Page 16: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Past National Surveys Tell Us

•Most of us in society don’t know 50% of our neighbors.

•75% of us think “breakdown in community” and “selfishness” are “serious” and “extremely serious” problems.

•80% of us believe that there should be more emphasis on community even if that put more demands on us.

Page 17: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

What psychologists, anthropologists and

sociologists tell us about Community.

Page 18: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

The Impact of Community on Important Social Issues

1. Putman ranked all states in term of Social Capital or Community

2. He compared all states in 4 important policy areas: education, crime, physical and mental health

3. What did he find?

Page 19: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

As Community Increased:

• Educational performance increases

• Crime decreases

• Physical Health increases

• Mental Health increases

Page 20: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

When Was the Last Time Society

Experienced a Strong Sense of

Community?

Page 21: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Civic Engagement a Way Out of the Wilderness

Page 22: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

• Civic Engagement is not…

• Selling the public on…• Getting votes for…• Convincing the public to….• A process where staff/non-profit controls outcome• A meeting to complain/find fault with…• A process of lobbying council meetings

Page 23: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

• The Essences of Public Engagement

• Citizens talking to citizens • Staff or elected posing the right questions• Staff and elected officials listening and learning not talking

NOT• Staff or elected officials answering questions in the front of the room.• Public naming, blaming and finding fault.

Page 24: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Why Civic Engagement is Tough…

• Distrust: Experience with “old” model.• New set of skills and leadership• Behavioral and attitudinal changes: By Govt.

and Citizens (Citizens vs.. Customers)• Perceived loss of control

Page 25: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

• Civic Engagement is a SPECTRUM and Hierarchy of Processes…

Any process you choose contains some aspects of the lower level processes

Empower> Collaborate >

Incorporate> Consult>Inform >

(Increasing the level of engagement and influence)

Page 26: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Definition of Stages…

Inform: Providing info only to the public

Consult: Asking the public for input

Incorporate: Involving the public in developing

alternatives or “forced choices”

Collaborating: Work with public to frame the issue as well

as develop alternatives to be discussed

Empower: Asking public to make the decision/solve the

problem within council guidelines

Page 27: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

So Now What

• The we the public have to let go of acting like customers

• Govt. must let go of acting like they can solve all problems

• The public must take responsibility

• Govt. must stop being so controlling

• Both must partner with each other

Page 28: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Today’s ProblemsRequire Partnerships

• Child Obesity

• Safety

• Education

• Homeliness

• Land Use/Development

• Balancing the budget

Page 29: Partnering with Local Governments: Why so Tough?

Q and A.

Reactions?