PARTICLE SHAPE DESCRIPTORS and THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR M. Chaze Université de...

27
PARTICLE SHAPE DESCRIPTORS and THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR M. Chaze Université de Lyon,Ecole Centrale de Lyon This work is done as a part of CEGEO french research project by LTDS U. Lyon, C. Nouguier, M. Chaze (regulars and irregulars polygons) LMGC U. Montpellier, F. Radjai et al. (clumps) Marie CHAZE 36, avenue Guy de Collongue F - 69134 Écully cedex Tél. +33 (0)4 72 18 62 24 [email protected]

Transcript of PARTICLE SHAPE DESCRIPTORS and THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR M. Chaze Université de...

  • PARTICLE SHAPE DESCRIPTORSand THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR M. Chaze Universit de Lyon,Ecole Centrale de Lyon

    This work is done as a part of CEGEO french research project by LTDS U. Lyon, C. Nouguier, M. Chaze (regulars and irregulars polygons)LMGC U. Montpellier, F. Radjai et al. (clumps)3S-R U. Grenoble, G. Combe, P. Villard et al. (non-convex clumps)Marie CHAZE36, avenue Guy de CollongueF - 69134 cully cedexTl. +33 (0)4 72 18 62 [email protected]

  • The purpose of the present study is to analyze the influence of the grains form indices upon the micro- and the macroscopic mechanical parameters.Do they reflect the quasistatic behavior and shear resistance volumetric change of complex soil behavior ?

    And how the indices affectthe contact strong and weak force network the force transmission patterns the compactness of the samples the coordination numbers the stick-slip phenomenon

    the mechanical behavior during the intensive computer simulation with DEM methods

  • We characterized the discrepancy from a disc (suggestion F.Radjai) using the scalar parameter

    R the radius of the largest circle containing the particle DR difference between the ex- and the in-circle of particle ( DR = 0. when the particle is a disc) We begin by considering octagonInscriptible (all the vertices are on the same circle)Octagon circumscribed in circle

    Geometrical octagon design

    With the variation of h from 0.1 to 0.4 octagon become irregular and regularCEGEO II

  • Generations of different samplesSome typical octagons using the h evolution.Regular octagon SquareCEGEO II

    h = 0.2h = 0.3h = 0.4

    h = 0.0824h = 0.414

  • Illustrations0.10.40.20.30.4double contact edge-to-edgesimple contactvertex-to-edgeColumnar structuresFacetisationCEGEO II

  • Bi Axial TestThe granular model 2D assembly of 5000 polydisperse frictional particles (discs && octagons)Their radius ranges vary from 3.e-2 to 9.8 e-2 m, the density is equal to 2800 kg.m-3. Modelling backgroundThe contact law (Signorini-Coulomb) with inelastic quasi-shocks (B. Cambou & M. Jean).All simulations have been performed with the Open Source platform LMGC90 http://www.lmgc.univ-montp2.fr/~dubois/LMGC90We create one sample square, by applying a constant velocity on the right and on the upper wall. This procedure allows to obtain homogeneous samplesto reduce the preferential direction of contact normal, (which does not occur with the gravity)interparticle friction =0 for a dense confined packingCEGEO II

  • by applying a constant stress, confining stress (10 kPa)ISOSTATIC PACKING Some observations:Isotropic Compression Evolution of stick (edge-to-edge) and slide (vertex-to-edge) contacts

    Evidence for large class of weak (dashed line) forces carried by vertex-to-edge slide contacts. Strong force chains (plain line) are composed of edge-to-edge stick contacts acts as the skeleton.Evolution of the contacts number with hCEGEO II

  • Summary tableCEGEO II

    Shapes indicator0.0.10.20.30.4 = 0.Z0Mean number of contacting neighbors per particle 3.7834.74.44.454.5Compacity Cisoh affects the compactness 0.8450.8510.8630.8740.876

  • Fn normal contact forceCEGEO II

  • CEGEO II

  • Rpartition des fnCEGEO II

  • is simulated

    at constant mean controlled stress by displacement loaded with interparticles friction =0.5&&interparticles and walls friction =0.

    To avoid dynamics effects, the velocity is chosen such as the inertia parameter I ~ 10-4. These calculations are drived on intensive calculator.The vertical compression stateCEGEO II

  • Coordinence ZContact_numberMechanical Analysis of the microscopic response of the testsThe proportions of contacts are correlated with the grains shape slightly increase with higher values of h.Similar tendency with the z. For the discs they become stables rapidlyCEGEO II

  • In the residual stateIndependent of h ?CEGEO II

    Shapes indicator0.0.10.20.30.4ZMean number of contacting neighbors per particle 3.163.34 3.43.783.84Ziso/ZcritDegree of connectivity1.21.41.31.21.2CompacitySpace-filling aptitude0.810.7840.79090.8030.809

  • Volumetric strain versus axial strain

    Octagons show steeper dilatancy slope than discs.

    Strain-stress responsestress ratioCEGEO II

    h0.0.10.20.30.4sin f*0.2790.39640.39700.3810.435StD0.006240.065960.09650.05490.00465

  • Friction angles

    fpeak && fcritincrease with hCEGEO II

    Shapes indicator0.0.10.20.30.4carrf*residual state Mean 16,3357Std D0,3225Mean 23,05Std D0,4Mean23,35Std D 0,55 Mean23,72 Std D 0,718Mean24,45 Std D 0,177

  • Snapshot of radial forces(thickness propotional)Force transmission of octagonal particles. The side to side contacts not transmit torques. Class of weak forces carried by vertex-to-edge slide contacts (dashed lines).strong force chains are composed of edge-to-edge sticks contacts (plain lines). CEGEO II

  • Analysis of local kinematicsdistribution of branch vector sethistogram of branch vector setCEGEO II

  • CEGEO II

  • Strain localization in the samples (using local strain maps computed like Delauney triangulation) View of e11 for compressive displacement and e22 for extension displacement for h = 0.3 near the peak value of the internal angle of frictionCEGEO II

  • Percentile of a dataset e11, e22, e12, e21 according to deformations definitionCEGEO II

  • CEGEO II

  • Other directions (areas of futur investication) are:The 3D extensionDiscretisation Delaunay 3D

    Volumetric strain versus axial strain Stress Strain responseCEGEO II

  • CEGEO II

  • Discretisation Delaunay 3DCEGEO II

  • The parameter h is a good shape parameter for our 2D granular packings?

    There are clear differences in the behavior of discs ( the geometry overestimate the role of rotations) and convex octagonsTo explain there are, two factors the most relevant : the anisotropy of stress transmission is due to the shape anisotropy (Azema et al. 2007)

    With the variation of h, octagons become irregular, regular, and square with change of vertex numberThe face-to-face or edge-to-edge contacts create facets, and form columnar structures. Also, locking may happen, the evolution of the grains is not possible or is possible only if the reaction forces increase dramatically, and in rough case, if at last some errors are allowed. These behaviors are favored in collections of octagons which have a tendency to organize as crystals, like clusters, while collections of poly-sized disks are easier to deform.

    CEGEO II

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The author is indebted Cambou B., Radjai F., Jean M. for theirs stimulationsCEGEO II

    *************