Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

21
PENAPH – First technical workshop 12 December, 2012 Murad Ali Senior Programme Officer, Brooke India Participatory Impact Assessment of Animal Health Through Collective Action

description

Presented by Murad Ali at the PENAPH First Technical Workshop, Chiangmai, Thailand, 11 – 13 December 2012.

Transcript of Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Page 1: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

PENAPH – First technical workshop

12 December, 2012

Murad Ali

Senior Programme Officer,

Brooke India

Participatory Impact Assessment of Animal Health Through Collective Action

Page 2: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

The Brooke: An overview

• The Brooke is an International animal welfare charity

founded in 1934 by Dorothy Brooke, wife of a Cavalry

General

• The Brooke is dedicated to improving the lives of

working horses, mules and donkeys

• The Brooke India is an affiliate of Brooke UK, working

in 8 states of India through 30 units, covering .23

million equine population

2

Page 3: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Introduction:

• Animal health and welfare problems are diverse and

often very specific to the context in which the animal

works

• Various methods are being applied to assess the health

and welfare status of animals

• Brooke India evolved an innovative participatory

process to assess the status of animal health,

husbandry practices and related resources, called

“Participatory Welfare Need Assessment”- PWNA

3

Page 4: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Introduction:

PWNA is set of participatory tools which facilitates

communities to:

� develop their own indicators for assessing equine

health and welfare,

� identify their issues and;

� taking collective action to improve husbandry

practices and health status of their animals

4

Page 5: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Participatory Welfare Need Assessment (PWNA) 5

Page 6: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Steps of PWNA

1 Build understanding on health and welfare of animals

2 Develop assessment Protocol

3 Transect walk & Recording

4 Analysis and Collective action:

5 Repeat transect walk to observe the changes/impact

6

Page 7: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Process: Step-1- Building understanding on animal welfare

• Mobilize equine owners into “Equine Welfare Group”

• Build understanding on five freedom

• Build understanding on welfare issue through:

� horse puzzle game,

� children art competition,

� body mapping etc.

7

Page 8: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Step-2 : Developing Assessment Protocol 8

“If I were a horse” an animal centric tool used to finalize assessment criteria with the community

Horse in the center

What do you expect from owners?

Present status about expectation fulfillment in 0-10 scale ?

Effect when expectation were not met

Effect, where it can be seen in animal body, practice and resources

Putting own-self at the place of animal and start with expectations from its owner to enable the community to identify health and welfare needs.

Putting own-self at the place of animal and start with expectations from its owner to enable the community to identify health and welfare needs.

Page 9: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Field exercise : “If I were a horse”

9

Page 10: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

“If I were a horse”: Output

Husbandry practice related

Animal related

Resource related

10

Symbol Means

●●● Green circle for good welfare status

●●● Blue/yellow circle for average welfare status

●●● Red circle reflect as poor welfare status

An understanding on scoring/marking method developed

Type of indicator /criteria developed

Page 11: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Step-3: Transect walk and Recording Use of “Traffic Light” tool for transect walk and recording 11

Page 12: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Transect walk and recording 12

Page 13: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Step- :4 Analysis and Collective action

List of

indicators Name of owners Total

1 2 3 4

A ● ● ● ●

B ● ● ● ●

C ● ● ● ●

D ● ● ● ●

E ● ● ● ●

Total

To analyse prevalence of issues of the community

Root cause analysis of issues

Collective action to address issue followed by developing village action plan

To analyse animal/owners wise ranking

Inspiring best performing owners / prize distribution

After the transect walk community members sit along

with staff to analyze the chart of transect walk

13

Page 14: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Step-5: Repeat the transect walk on regular interval

• Transect walk on regular intervals helps analyze the changing trend

in each indicator

• Based on need and increasing sensitivity towards animals health

and welfare, the indicators and process of transect walk keeps

changing

• Action plan developed based on contributing factors such as

season, work load, feeding practices, internal and external

influences

• Best performing owners, communities, sub-districts awarded on

regular interval on the basis of positive changes

14

Page 15: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Repeated transect

Regular transect walk on same chart

16

Meeting and prize distribution

Page 16: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Main Results / Impact

• Numbers and type of assessment criteria/indicators changed

according to situations, need and awareness level of the community

• Scoring/transect methods and process of analysis changed after

sensitization of community

16

√ X or √ Binary

● ● ● Traffic light score

0,5,10 or 1-10

Numerical scoring

1,4,3 / 7,10,15

Weighting according to importance of indicators/issues

Mostly animal based

indicators

Indicators covering animals, practices and

resources

Reducing numbers of indicators based on sensitivity

Indicators based on their severity

Page 17: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Main Results / Impact

• Software based aggregation and analysis of PWNA/transect

walk data at district level by categorizing indicators and using

them for comparative analysis between villages and districts

• These analysis helps uncovering higher level factors

responsible for the positive and negative status of working

equine

• Responsibility of carrying out transect walk and their analysis

handed-over from staff to communities based institutions

17

Staff led at village level

Equal involvement of staff and Community

Community led at Village level

Association led at sub district level

Page 18: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Main Results / Impact

• Visible improvement in the health & welfare of animals such

as improved body condition, reduction in wound etc.

• The process builds capability of local community in:

� early recognition of negative changes and diseases of

animals and;

� taking prompt and effective action

• Improvement in husbandry practices such as cleaning of

stable, grooming, feeding, watering have also seen.

18

Page 19: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

19

• Observation of each others animals by group members during

transect walk helps:

� creating peer pressure to act towards better care of

animals

� promoting mutual learning and;

� strengthening the problem solving capacity of the

communities

Incremental improvement in health and welfare status have

been seen in whole process

Main Results / Impact

Page 20: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

Conclusion

• A sustainable impact on working equines health and welfare status,

resources and husbandry practices through regular collective

assessment of animals and analysis of finding and acting upon it

• Understanding the trends of equine welfare indicators and their

contributing factors to equine welfare at various level helps Brooke India

strategize its programmatic approach

• PWNA emerged as one of the key process of empowering equine owing

community towards better equine welfare in sustainable manner

20

Page 21: Participatory impact assessment of animal health through collective action

!

21

THANK YOU !