Vaccine Safety and Vaccine Safety Communication Otherwise Known as The Vaccine Wars.
Participating in an HIV vaccine trial By Jo Robinson, London, UK.
-
Upload
irma-marshall -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Participating in an HIV vaccine trial By Jo Robinson, London, UK.
Participating in an HIV vaccine trial
By Jo Robinson, London, UK
A participant’s perspective
Trial characteristicsAm I a typical participant?Beginning – informed consentThe jabsThe middle stage – clinic experiencesThings start to go wrongPressure and thoughts about withdrawing consentComing full circle – the future
Trial characteristics
A participants’ perspective:Part of a group of 120 –twinned with KenyaClade C DNA + MVA prime boost approachTrial visits at St. Mary’s Hospital, London, UKResults announced August 2004 shown to have poor
un-sustained immunological results IAVI decided to halt work on its DNA technologiesUn-blinded October 2004 – I was given 0.5mg DNA
(low dose) plus MVA.
Am I a typical volunteer?
Sex: Female (All volunteers: 55% female, 45% male)Age: 29 (Mean age: 35)Current sexual partner: (All volunteers: 61%)Employed/Student: (All volunteers: 97%)Sexuality: Gay (All volunteers: 22% gay)Main motivation: Altruism (All volunteers 44%) Link with HIV: Family & friends affected (All
volunteers: 30%) Interest in subject: (All volunteers: 32%)
Beginning – informed consent
Jargon: They say: A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
We say: No one knows what’s going on
They say: Fill in this form, and this one, and another 5 and we ask you to read back to us what is in your form so you understand
We say: I’m bored and it’s annoying how many questions I have to answer about my sex life
Raised liver enzymes – further tests, no payment
Enrolment – blood tests More blood tests, and
more… No payment for first four
visits as nurse has not been to the bank (again)
A set of blood tests from a stranger who then turned out to be Ken
My mind goes to work on the jabs
The jabs – they hurt, and cause big red marksTesting and monitoring – more visitsStarting to really think about DNA and the delivery
mechanism, - worrying about my own body – can I trust this technology?
The mice story – pre-cancerous cells are discovered in mice in labs receiving MVA – the trial is halted
Feelings around withdrawing consentFeeling pressurised (by myself) not to withdraw.
My (work) life I start to have health problems and clinic healthcare is better than
my GP. I start to ask are these problems vaccine related?
Being part of a small group of HIV NGOs invited to talk about vaccine trials – being told the trial you’re on won’t work (early)
Press enquiries – talking as a participant as well as a worker
Worrying well-meaning friends – HIV stigma
Other healthcare workers – assumptions about HIV status from the GP, in the sexual health clinic etc.
Cynicism hits the field (futility of volunteering becomes an issue)
Trial data on hold again – the mice – finding out by mistake from IAVI
Coming full circle – moving on
Now widely acknowledged that if you participate once you probably can’t again (solves that dilemma!)
Issues around whether using these early vaccines will mean you can’t benefit from one that might really work
Lack of feedback mechanisms – no participant evaluation, no social research, no Community Advisory Board or other involvement techniques.
DNA technologies dropped by IAVI.Forming a UKCAB sub-group on vaccines and
microbicides and looking to the future.