Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

44
Part Two

Transcript of Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Page 1: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Part Two

Page 2: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake

Page 3: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake

Page 4: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake

Page 5: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 6: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

September 1, 1992Magnitude 7.0 earthquakeShallow focus,Subsea landslideWaves 8-15m high

26 towns affected along250 km of coastlinereached 1 km inland

116 dead63 missing489 injured>40,000 lost home/income

Nicaragua Tsunami

Page 7: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

El Tranisto village

Population 1000,16 killed,151 injured

Most of village destroyed(> 200 houses)

3 main waves, highest > 9 m

Page 8: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Stone carried 50 m inland,1.9 m above sea level

Page 9: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Indonesia, December 1992 tsunami

Page 10: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Indonesia, December 1992 tsunami

Page 11: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

1964 Alaska earthquake

Effect of resulting tsunami at Prince William Sound,

Page 12: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Volcanic rocks onW margin of Tenerife

Page 13: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Tsunami threatenseastern USA…

Page 14: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 15: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Earthquake Prediction?

Page 16: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

How Often?

Page 17: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

More smaller earthquakes than bigger ones

Similar spatial distribution

Page 18: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 19: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 20: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 21: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 22: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Case History: North Anatolian Fault

• * Historical earthquake data shows temporal & spatial patterns

• * Numerical modelling of regional stress changes

Probability of earthquake hitting Istanbul…

Page 23: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Driving tectonic force:

Arabia is crashingnorthward intostable Eurasia

Page 24: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Anatolia is squeezed out westwards as Arabia piles northward into stable Eurasia

Page 25: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Pattern of seismicity since 1950 is rather worrying for Istanbul!

Page 26: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Using historical records

1. Use modern earthquakes to explain historical events

2. Use historical earthquakes to make predictions for future events

Page 27: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Historical records of earthquakes go back over 1000 years in E Europe and the Middle East

Page 28: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 29: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 30: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 31: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.
Page 32: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Spatio-temporal progressions are not uncommon on the North Anatolian fault

Page 33: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

First parameterise fault geometry and

regional plate motion...

Page 34: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Estimated stress change associatedwith 1939 earthquake

Page 35: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Cumulative stress change caused by large earthquakes and steady deep slip on the North Anatolian fault since 1939

Page 36: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Predictive power of model:

Stress situation after the 1939 and 1949 earthquakes.

The subsequent 1966 and 1971 fault breaks occurred in regions of high stress change.

Page 37: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

“. . . During the next 30 years, we estimate a 15% probability of a M>=6.7 earthquake east of the major eastern center of Ercinzan, and a 12% probability for a large event south of the major western port city of Izmit. . .”

Stein et al., Geophysical Journal International, 1997

Page 38: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

B A N G!

Page 39: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Repeat the calculations to include the 1999 Izmit and Duzce earthquakes

Before . . .

. . . After

Page 40: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

“The probability of strong shaking affecting Istanbul is calculated as 62 +/- 15% (1 S.D.) during the next 30 years and 32 +/- 12% during the next decade.”

Parsons et al., Science, 2000

Page 41: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Mitigation

Page 42: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

The USC University Hospital was built with base isolators to allow it to withstand strong earthquake shaking.

Page 43: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

The success of the design strategy was demonstrated in the 1994 Northridge quake, when the hospital and its contents suffered no damage, despite the servere ground shaking produced by the quake.

Page 44: Part Two. 21/02/11: Christchurch Earthquake.

Before . . . . . . After