Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

download Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

of 15

Transcript of Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    1/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Chapter 10

    Buildup AnalysisFollowing A Constant-Rate

    Drawdown

    Problems with Drawdown Tests

    It is difficult to produce a well at astrictly constant rate

    Even small variations in rate distort thepressure response

    There is one rate that is easy to maintain A flow rate of zero.

    A buildup test is conducted by shuttingin a producing well and measuring theresulting pressure response.

    Buildup

    Usually more common to run and analyzepressure buildup tests.

    Well is produced at constant or variable rate

    for some time, then it is shut in (i.e.,produced at zero rate)

    The increasing wellbore pressure isrecorded as a function of shut-in time.

    Buildup data are analyzed to giveestimates of the same parameters that areavailable from pressure drawdown data.

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    2/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Buildup Test - Rate History

    t0

    - q

    0 tp + t

    q

    tp t0

    q

    Buildup Test - Pressure Response

    ttp

    t0

    tp + t

    Pi

    pi

    Model Buildup Pressure Response

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    3/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Buildup Superposition

    Pressure behavior determined by a simpleapplication of the principle ofsuperposition

    It is simply the superposition of twoconstant-rate drawdown solutions:

    ( ) ( ) ( )tpqttqptpp upuwsi ++=

    -First term: continuous production at rate q-Second term: production at rate q starting at tp (t= 0)

    Buildup Superposition

    For log-log analysis purposes, we may use adifferent from of the buildup superpositionequation:

    ( )[ ] ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tpqttqptqptpptpp upupuwsipwfi ++=

    Pressure During Buildup

    Buildup equation valid for all reservoir flowregimes and also account for wellborestorage.

    For transient infinite-acting radial flow where

    Buildup pressure given by

    ( ) ( )

    +

    += 0.87s3.23

    rc

    klogtlog

    kh

    162.6Btp

    2

    wt

    u

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

    +=

    ++=

    t

    ttlog

    kh

    162.6qB

    tpqttqptpp

    p

    upuwsi

    Horners Equation

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    4/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Horner Equation and Analysis

    ++++====

    t

    ttlog

    kh

    qB6.162pp p

    10iws

    y = mx + b

    Buildup TestStraight Line Analogy

    hm

    qB6.162k

    ====

    1t

    tt@bp p

    i ====

    ++++====

    Horner Plot

    infinite shut-in

    p*pi

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    5/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Skin Factor from Horner Analysis

    Note that, unlike the semilog analysis fordrawdown data, the skin factor is notdirectly obtainable from a Horner plot underinfinite acting radial flow.

    Horner Plot

    This does not meanthat the skin doesnot affect thepressure in thebuildup --- it does.

    It simply has noeffect on thesemilog straight linethat we use foranalysis.

    Shut-in

    Pressure,psi

    kh

    qBm o

    =

    6.162

    1

    +

    t

    ttplog

    Increasing shut-in time

    Horner Line

    WellboreStorage

    Skin Factor

    To obtain the skin factor, we use the lastdrawdown data point, pwf(tp)=pws(t=0).

    From semilog straight line just before

    shut-in

    Subtract Horner straight line

    ( )

    +

    += 0.87s3.23

    rc

    klogtlog

    kh

    162.6qB)(tpp

    2

    wt

    ppwfi

    ( )

    +=

    t

    ttlog

    kh

    162.6qBtpp

    p

    wsi

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    6/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Determination of Skin

    Resulting Equation is the Argawal Equivalenttime semilog equation

    To obtain skin, we evaluate this expression at ashut-in time of 1 hour, and call the value as p1hr

    Solve for skin gives:

    ( )

    +

    +

    += 0.87s3.23

    rcklog

    ttttlog

    kh162.6qB)(tptp

    2

    wtp

    p

    pwfws

    +

    +

    += 0.87s3.23

    rc

    klog

    t

    1tlog

    kh

    162.6qB)(tpp

    2

    wtp

    p

    pwf1hr

    ( )

    +

    ++

    = 3.23

    t

    1tlog

    rc

    klog

    m

    tpp1.151s

    p

    p

    2

    wt

    pwf1hr

    Notes on Horner Plot

    The value of p1hr is obtained by extrapolatingthe semilog straight line to a time of 1 hr. It isnot the actual value of shut-in pressure at1hr.

    If the reservoir is infinite-acting, extrapolatingthe Horner semilog straight line to a Hornertime ratio of 1 will yield an estimate of theinitial reservoir pressure, pi

    ( )

    +=

    t

    ttlog

    kh

    162.6qBtpp

    p

    wsi

    Horner Analysis for Closed Systems

    Time

    Pressure

    re

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    7/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Bounded Systemspi=5000

    4993)5( ==tp

    1E-5 1E-4 1E-3 1E-2 1E-1 1E+0 1E+1 1E+24880

    4920

    4960

    5000

    0.2 saat retim

    0.5 saat retim

    1 saat retim

    5 saat retim

    10 saat retim

    20 saat retimBottomh

    olepressure,pwf,psi

    Total time, t, hour

    Radial flow

    period

    4985)10( ==tp

    4930)20( ==tp

    qsc = 54 STB/D

    re = 500 ft

    0.2 h prod.

    0.5

    1.0

    5.0

    10.0

    20.0

    re

    Average Reservoir Pressure

    In any closed system, average reservoirpressure can be expressed by the followingequation:

    If flow rate is constant, then

    =t

    0pt

    i dtqBVc

    5.615pp

    Cumulative production(STB)

    tVc

    5.615qBpp

    pt

    i=

    hAVp =

    Bounded Systems-Horner Analysis

    If the reservoir is notinfinite acting at thetime of shut-in, theHorner straight line will

    extrapolate to a falsepressure p*.

    Matthews-Brons-Hazebroek correlatedaverage reservoirpressure with Hornerfalse pressure. MBHanalysis will bediscussed later.

    Shut-inPressure,psi

    kh

    qBm o

    =

    6.162

    1

    +

    t

    ttplog

    Increasing shut-in time

    Horner Line

    WellboreStorage

    p*

    p

    ReservoirAveragePressure

    False Pressure

    Initial Pressure

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    8/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Buildup MDH Analysis

    The buildup pressure drop can be written as

    Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson approximated

    MDH buildup equation:

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]pupuupwfwsws tpttptpqtptpp ++=

    pupu tpttp +

    ( ) ( ) ( )tqptptptp upwfwsws ==

    Significance

    MDH equation states that for smallshut-in times, buildup pressure changewill duplicate the correspondingdrawdown pressure drop at the samevalue of time.

    True regardless of well or reservoirgeometry.

    Applies for wellbore storage problem

    For radial flow

    ( ) ( ) ( )

    +

    += 0.87s3.23

    rcklogtlog

    kh162.6qBtptp 2

    wt

    pwfws

    MDH Plot

    kh

    162.6qBm=

    +

    = 3.23

    rc

    klog

    m

    p1.151s

    2

    wt

    1hr

    pwfws,1hr1hr tppp =

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    9/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Buildup versus Drawdown

    We saw that for small shut-in times, builduppressure change data will duplicate

    drawdown data.All analysis techniques that worked for

    drawdown will work on buildup data;wellbore storage, radial flow, type curveanalysis

    Buildup data will not enter pseudosteadystate.

    Shut-in pressure will approach averagereservoir pressure before the time topseudosteady state flow.

    Buildup vs Drawdown Curves

    Vertical well in closed system

    Pressure change

    derivative

    Argarwal Equivalent Time

    Most modern well test analysis packagesand commercial software use anequivalent shut-in time to analyzebuildup data

    First proposed by Argarwal for analyzingbuildup semilog data following asemilog drawdown period.

    Can be applied to any well/reservoirgeometry

    Usually extends the range of buildupdata that can be analyzed.

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    10/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    Argarwal Equivalent Time

    This time transformation is an attempt toconvert buildup pressure signal p

    ws

    =pws(t)-pwf(tp) to an equivalent drawdownpressure signal change so that buildup datacan be analyzed by using drawdown analysismethods (straight line and log-log analyses):

    ( ) ( ) ( )eupwfwsws tqptptptp ==

    tt

    ttt

    p

    p

    e+

    =

    Derivative Analysis for Buildup

    For log-log diagnostic purposes, we differentiatebuildup pressure change with respect toAgarwals equivalent time:

    Then, plot pws vs te together with dpws/dlntevs t.

    ( ) ( )[ ]

    ( )e

    pwfws

    wstdln

    tptpdp

    =

    Notes on Use of te Plotting buildup pressure change and its derivative using

    Agarwal equivalent time (or multi-rate Agarwal equivalentor superposition time function to be discussed) willcorrelate quite well with the drawdown solutions if we

    have long producing times and infinite acting radial f low. However, the use of equivalent time:

    Over corrects if tp is small compared to buildupduration,

    Reduces a long buildup into a short equivalentdrawdown because te approaches to tp as t getslarger,

    Distorts the flow regimes and transition periods whenboundaries affect the buildup response.

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    11/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    31

    Buildup vs Drawdown Curves

    Pressure change

    Derivative

    Producing time effects distort flow regimes!

    m

    2m

    Well near a sealing fault

    Well In A Channel

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09

    Dimensionless time

    Dimensionlesspre

    ssure

    Well In A Channel ReservoirDrawdown Type Curve

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    12/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09

    Dimensionless shutin time

    Dimensionlesspressure

    tpD=108

    tpD=107

    tpD=106

    tpD=105

    Drawdown

    Channel Reservoir - Buildup ResponseDerivative With Respect To Shutin Time

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09

    Dimensionless equivalent time

    Dimensionlesspressure

    tpD=105

    tpD=106

    tpD=107

    tpD=108

    Drawdown

    Channel Reservoir - Buildup Response

    Derivative With Respect To Equivalent Time

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09

    Dimensionless time function

    Dimensionlesspre

    ssure

    tpD=105

    tpD=106

    tpD=107

    tpD=108

    Drawdown

    Channel Reservoir - Buildup Response

    Derivative WRT Equivalent Time vsShutinTime

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    13/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    37

    Horner Type Straight LineAnalysis For Other Flow Regimes

    For flow regimes different from radial, we

    can perform Horner type analysis basedon the superposition time that isappropriate for the flow regime identified.

    For linear flow

    Bi-linear flow

    Spherical flow

    tttt ps +=

    44 tttt ps +=

    tttt

    p

    s+

    = 11

    38

    Spherical Flow Example

    Spherical flow period 8-20 sec

    Start of radial flow 30 sec

    39

    Spherical Flow Horner Plot

    tttt

    p

    s+

    = 11

    ( ) 3/13/2

    1856)/(t

    s

    s c

    m

    qk

    =

    slope

    cm3/sec

    vhsvhs kkkkkk == 3/23/12 )(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    14/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    40

    Radial Flow Horner Plot

    =

    r

    hm

    qhk 36.88)/(

    cm3/sec

    slope

    41

    General Approach-Convolution

    Buildup is in fact a variable rate flow problemand cannot rigourosuly correlated withdrawdown. Thus, the general approachmodeling any variable rate flow problem shoulduse Duhamels equation:

    ( )mod0

    ( , ) ( , )

    t

    i ucp t p q p t d =

    r r

    Flow rate history Unit-rate solution

    42

    Non-Linear RegressionAnalysis

    Modern approach uses non-linear regressionanalysis to estimate parameters by historymatching obseerved pressures and accountingfor variable flow rate history. The commonmethod is to use weighted-least squaresapproach.

  • 8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page

    15/15

    Well Test Analysis September 20

    43

    Weighted Least-Squares

    ( )

    =

    =

    obsN

    i o

    imodiobs tpp

    J1

    2

    , ,)(

    r

    r

    ( ) ( )

    ==

    +

    =

    2,1,

    1

    2

    2,

    ,2

    1

    2

    1,

    ,1 ,,)(obsobs N

    i o

    imodiobs

    N

    i o

    imodiobs tpptpp

    J

    rr

    r

    44

    Computed Aided Approach

    45

    Computed Aided Approach

    field data

    Calculated model