Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
Transcript of Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
1/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Chapter 10
Buildup AnalysisFollowing A Constant-Rate
Drawdown
Problems with Drawdown Tests
It is difficult to produce a well at astrictly constant rate
Even small variations in rate distort thepressure response
There is one rate that is easy to maintain A flow rate of zero.
A buildup test is conducted by shuttingin a producing well and measuring theresulting pressure response.
Buildup
Usually more common to run and analyzepressure buildup tests.
Well is produced at constant or variable rate
for some time, then it is shut in (i.e.,produced at zero rate)
The increasing wellbore pressure isrecorded as a function of shut-in time.
Buildup data are analyzed to giveestimates of the same parameters that areavailable from pressure drawdown data.
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
2/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Buildup Test - Rate History
t0
- q
0 tp + t
q
tp t0
q
Buildup Test - Pressure Response
ttp
t0
tp + t
Pi
pi
Model Buildup Pressure Response
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
3/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Buildup Superposition
Pressure behavior determined by a simpleapplication of the principle ofsuperposition
It is simply the superposition of twoconstant-rate drawdown solutions:
( ) ( ) ( )tpqttqptpp upuwsi ++=
-First term: continuous production at rate q-Second term: production at rate q starting at tp (t= 0)
Buildup Superposition
For log-log analysis purposes, we may use adifferent from of the buildup superpositionequation:
( )[ ] ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tpqttqptqptpptpp upupuwsipwfi ++=
Pressure During Buildup
Buildup equation valid for all reservoir flowregimes and also account for wellborestorage.
For transient infinite-acting radial flow where
Buildup pressure given by
( ) ( )
+
+= 0.87s3.23
rc
klogtlog
kh
162.6Btp
2
wt
u
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
+=
++=
t
ttlog
kh
162.6qB
tpqttqptpp
p
upuwsi
Horners Equation
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
4/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Horner Equation and Analysis
++++====
t
ttlog
kh
qB6.162pp p
10iws
y = mx + b
Buildup TestStraight Line Analogy
hm
qB6.162k
====
1t
tt@bp p
i ====
++++====
Horner Plot
infinite shut-in
p*pi
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
5/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Skin Factor from Horner Analysis
Note that, unlike the semilog analysis fordrawdown data, the skin factor is notdirectly obtainable from a Horner plot underinfinite acting radial flow.
Horner Plot
This does not meanthat the skin doesnot affect thepressure in thebuildup --- it does.
It simply has noeffect on thesemilog straight linethat we use foranalysis.
Shut-in
Pressure,psi
kh
qBm o
=
6.162
1
+
t
ttplog
Increasing shut-in time
Horner Line
WellboreStorage
Skin Factor
To obtain the skin factor, we use the lastdrawdown data point, pwf(tp)=pws(t=0).
From semilog straight line just before
shut-in
Subtract Horner straight line
( )
+
+= 0.87s3.23
rc
klogtlog
kh
162.6qB)(tpp
2
wt
ppwfi
( )
+=
t
ttlog
kh
162.6qBtpp
p
wsi
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
6/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Determination of Skin
Resulting Equation is the Argawal Equivalenttime semilog equation
To obtain skin, we evaluate this expression at ashut-in time of 1 hour, and call the value as p1hr
Solve for skin gives:
( )
+
+
+= 0.87s3.23
rcklog
ttttlog
kh162.6qB)(tptp
2
wtp
p
pwfws
+
+
+= 0.87s3.23
rc
klog
t
1tlog
kh
162.6qB)(tpp
2
wtp
p
pwf1hr
( )
+
++
= 3.23
t
1tlog
rc
klog
m
tpp1.151s
p
p
2
wt
pwf1hr
Notes on Horner Plot
The value of p1hr is obtained by extrapolatingthe semilog straight line to a time of 1 hr. It isnot the actual value of shut-in pressure at1hr.
If the reservoir is infinite-acting, extrapolatingthe Horner semilog straight line to a Hornertime ratio of 1 will yield an estimate of theinitial reservoir pressure, pi
( )
+=
t
ttlog
kh
162.6qBtpp
p
wsi
Horner Analysis for Closed Systems
Time
Pressure
re
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
7/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Bounded Systemspi=5000
4993)5( ==tp
1E-5 1E-4 1E-3 1E-2 1E-1 1E+0 1E+1 1E+24880
4920
4960
5000
0.2 saat retim
0.5 saat retim
1 saat retim
5 saat retim
10 saat retim
20 saat retimBottomh
olepressure,pwf,psi
Total time, t, hour
Radial flow
period
4985)10( ==tp
4930)20( ==tp
qsc = 54 STB/D
re = 500 ft
0.2 h prod.
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
20.0
re
Average Reservoir Pressure
In any closed system, average reservoirpressure can be expressed by the followingequation:
If flow rate is constant, then
=t
0pt
i dtqBVc
5.615pp
Cumulative production(STB)
tVc
5.615qBpp
pt
i=
hAVp =
Bounded Systems-Horner Analysis
If the reservoir is notinfinite acting at thetime of shut-in, theHorner straight line will
extrapolate to a falsepressure p*.
Matthews-Brons-Hazebroek correlatedaverage reservoirpressure with Hornerfalse pressure. MBHanalysis will bediscussed later.
Shut-inPressure,psi
kh
qBm o
=
6.162
1
+
t
ttplog
Increasing shut-in time
Horner Line
WellboreStorage
p*
p
ReservoirAveragePressure
False Pressure
Initial Pressure
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
8/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Buildup MDH Analysis
The buildup pressure drop can be written as
Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson approximated
MDH buildup equation:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]pupuupwfwsws tpttptpqtptpp ++=
pupu tpttp +
( ) ( ) ( )tqptptptp upwfwsws ==
Significance
MDH equation states that for smallshut-in times, buildup pressure changewill duplicate the correspondingdrawdown pressure drop at the samevalue of time.
True regardless of well or reservoirgeometry.
Applies for wellbore storage problem
For radial flow
( ) ( ) ( )
+
+= 0.87s3.23
rcklogtlog
kh162.6qBtptp 2
wt
pwfws
MDH Plot
kh
162.6qBm=
+
= 3.23
rc
klog
m
p1.151s
2
wt
1hr
pwfws,1hr1hr tppp =
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
9/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Buildup versus Drawdown
We saw that for small shut-in times, builduppressure change data will duplicate
drawdown data.All analysis techniques that worked for
drawdown will work on buildup data;wellbore storage, radial flow, type curveanalysis
Buildup data will not enter pseudosteadystate.
Shut-in pressure will approach averagereservoir pressure before the time topseudosteady state flow.
Buildup vs Drawdown Curves
Vertical well in closed system
Pressure change
derivative
Argarwal Equivalent Time
Most modern well test analysis packagesand commercial software use anequivalent shut-in time to analyzebuildup data
First proposed by Argarwal for analyzingbuildup semilog data following asemilog drawdown period.
Can be applied to any well/reservoirgeometry
Usually extends the range of buildupdata that can be analyzed.
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
10/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
Argarwal Equivalent Time
This time transformation is an attempt toconvert buildup pressure signal p
ws
=pws(t)-pwf(tp) to an equivalent drawdownpressure signal change so that buildup datacan be analyzed by using drawdown analysismethods (straight line and log-log analyses):
( ) ( ) ( )eupwfwsws tqptptptp ==
tt
ttt
p
p
e+
=
Derivative Analysis for Buildup
For log-log diagnostic purposes, we differentiatebuildup pressure change with respect toAgarwals equivalent time:
Then, plot pws vs te together with dpws/dlntevs t.
( ) ( )[ ]
( )e
pwfws
wstdln
tptpdp
=
Notes on Use of te Plotting buildup pressure change and its derivative using
Agarwal equivalent time (or multi-rate Agarwal equivalentor superposition time function to be discussed) willcorrelate quite well with the drawdown solutions if we
have long producing times and infinite acting radial f low. However, the use of equivalent time:
Over corrects if tp is small compared to buildupduration,
Reduces a long buildup into a short equivalentdrawdown because te approaches to tp as t getslarger,
Distorts the flow regimes and transition periods whenboundaries affect the buildup response.
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
11/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
31
Buildup vs Drawdown Curves
Pressure change
Derivative
Producing time effects distort flow regimes!
m
2m
Well near a sealing fault
Well In A Channel
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09
Dimensionless time
Dimensionlesspre
ssure
Well In A Channel ReservoirDrawdown Type Curve
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
12/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09
Dimensionless shutin time
Dimensionlesspressure
tpD=108
tpD=107
tpD=106
tpD=105
Drawdown
Channel Reservoir - Buildup ResponseDerivative With Respect To Shutin Time
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09
Dimensionless equivalent time
Dimensionlesspressure
tpD=105
tpD=106
tpD=107
tpD=108
Drawdown
Channel Reservoir - Buildup Response
Derivative With Respect To Equivalent Time
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09
Dimensionless time function
Dimensionlesspre
ssure
tpD=105
tpD=106
tpD=107
tpD=108
Drawdown
Channel Reservoir - Buildup Response
Derivative WRT Equivalent Time vsShutinTime
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
13/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
37
Horner Type Straight LineAnalysis For Other Flow Regimes
For flow regimes different from radial, we
can perform Horner type analysis basedon the superposition time that isappropriate for the flow regime identified.
For linear flow
Bi-linear flow
Spherical flow
tttt ps +=
44 tttt ps +=
tttt
p
s+
= 11
38
Spherical Flow Example
Spherical flow period 8-20 sec
Start of radial flow 30 sec
39
Spherical Flow Horner Plot
tttt
p
s+
= 11
( ) 3/13/2
1856)/(t
s
s c
m
qk
=
slope
cm3/sec
vhsvhs kkkkkk == 3/23/12 )(
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
14/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
40
Radial Flow Horner Plot
=
r
hm
qhk 36.88)/(
cm3/sec
slope
41
General Approach-Convolution
Buildup is in fact a variable rate flow problemand cannot rigourosuly correlated withdrawdown. Thus, the general approachmodeling any variable rate flow problem shoulduse Duhamels equation:
( )mod0
( , ) ( , )
t
i ucp t p q p t d =
r r
Flow rate history Unit-rate solution
42
Non-Linear RegressionAnalysis
Modern approach uses non-linear regressionanalysis to estimate parameters by historymatching obseerved pressures and accountingfor variable flow rate history. The commonmethod is to use weighted-least squaresapproach.
-
8/13/2019 Part 10 Buildup Followed CR Drawdown 3slides on 1page
15/15
Well Test Analysis September 20
43
Weighted Least-Squares
( )
=
=
obsN
i o
imodiobs tpp
J1
2
, ,)(
r
r
( ) ( )
==
+
=
2,1,
1
2
2,
,2
1
2
1,
,1 ,,)(obsobs N
i o
imodiobs
N
i o
imodiobs tpptpp
J
rr
r
44
Computed Aided Approach
45
Computed Aided Approach
field data
Calculated model