PARCC Year 3 Results: Spring 2017 Administrations€¦ · Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not...

Measuring College and Career Readiness

1

PARCC Year 3 Results:Spring 2017

Administrations

Warren Hills Regional School District

October 3, 2017

¡ 2017 marks the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the second opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show.

¡ Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.

¡ Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 –8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

New Jersey’s Statewide Assessment Program

2

¡ Spring 2010, there were 24 PARCC States.

¡ As of July 2017, there are 6 remaining PARCC States, Washington, D.C., and PARCC for the Bureau of Indian Education and the Department of Defense Schools:

IllinoisMarylandNew JerseyNew MexicoRhode Island.

3

PARCC STATES

4

COM PARISON OF WARRE N H IL L S RE GIONAL M ID D L E SCHOOL ST UD E NT S T E ST E D SP RING 2015 , SP RING 2016 , AND SP RING 2017 PARCC

AD M INIST RAT IONS PART IC IPAT ION RAT E

Total Enrollment

EnglishLanguage ArtsParticipation Rate

MathematicsParticipation Rate

Schoolwide Participation Rate

Changein Percent

Spring2015PARCC Year 1

600 Students

84.2% 84.2 % 84.2% N/A

Spring 2016PARCCYear 2

589 Students

95% 95% 95% 10.8 %Increase

Spring2017PARCCYear 3

619 Students

98.4% 98.4% 98.4% 14.2% Increase (2015)3.4% Increase (2016)

5

COM PARISON OF WARRE N H IL L S RE GIONAL H IGH SCHOOL ST UD E NT S T E ST E D SP RING 2015 , SP RING 2016 , AND SP RING 2017 PARCC

AD M INIST RAT IONS PART IC IPAT ION RAT E

Total Enrollment

EnglishLanguage ArtsParticipation Rate

MathematicsParticipation Rate

Schoolwide Participation Rate

Changein Percent

Spring2015PARCC Year 1

1,286Students

54.4% 54.4% 54.4% N/A

Spring 2016PARCCYear 2

1,265 Students

94% 93% 93.5% 39.1%Increase

Spring2017PARCCYear 3

[1,684 online tests administered]

93.4% 93.4% 93.4% 39%Increase (2015)0.1% decrease (2016)

¡ PARCC — Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers: is the New Jersey State Assessment designed “to provide schools with information to improve classroom instruction and to give parents valuable feedback about their child’s progress”;

¡ Performance Levels : Describes 5 levels of expectations students can score on the PARCC (range of Level 1—not yet meeting expectations to Level 5—exceeding expectations);

¡ Scale Score: Describes the range of numbers that accompany each of the performance levels (range of Level 1, 650-699 to Level 5, 810-850).

6

A FEW DEFINITIONS

¡ Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations(650-699)

¡ Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations(700-724)

¡ Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations(725-749)

¡ Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations(750-809)

¡ Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations(810-850)

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

7

Levels 1 and 2

Levels 4 and 5

8

PERCENTAGE CHANGES IN LEVELS

¡ DOWN Arrow: For data tables giving percentage changes, if there is a DOWN arrow for Performance Level 1 and Level 2 , this shows improvement , for there was a decrease in the numbers of students not yet meeting expectations and/or partially meeting expectations; and

¡ UP Arrow: For data tables giving percentage changes, if there is an UP arrow for Performance Level 4 and Level 5 , this shows improvement , for there was an increase in the numbers of students meeting expectations and/or exceeding expectations.

9

A FEW NOTES

¡General trending in the right direction in English Language Arts and Mathematics

¡Only a few “outliers”

10

OVERARCHING THEME FROM PARCC YEAR 3ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND MATHEMATICS

11

COMPARISON OF WARREN HILLS REGIONAL’SSPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Change in Level 1 and

Level 2 From 2015

to 2017

Change in Level 4

and Level 5

From 2015 to 2017**Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

7 6.5% 9.9% 7.7% 23.6% 14.2% 17.4%28.5

% 30.0% 27.5%32.9

% 35.0% 37.6% 8.5% 10.9% 9.7% 5.0 % 6.5%

8 10.8% 6.5% 12.3% 11.6% 11.2% 9.0%23.1

% 30.0% 18.7%41.4

% 48.8% 42.7% 13.3% 12.3% 17.3% 5.1% 5.3 %

9 11.7% 7.2% 7.1% 15.6% 13.2% 16.3%29.8

% 22.0% 21.4%36.1

% 44.7% 45.9% 6.8% 12.9% 9.2% 3.9 % 12.2 %

10 23.6% 14.6% 18.9% 22.2% 18.6% 16.0%23.6

% 26.9% 22.1%21.5

% 30.6% 31.3% 9.0% 9.3% 11.7% 10.9% 12.5%

11* 7.7% 12.4% 31.2%18.5

% 20.5% 21.4%23.1

% 19.0% 23.7%33.1

% 37.2% 21.4% 17.7% 10.9% 2.3% 26.4% 27.1%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Note: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

12


(Level 1)


(Level 2)


(Level 3)


(Level 4)


(Level 5)

Change in Level 1 and

Level 2 From

2015 to 2017

Change in Level 4

and Level 5 From

2015 to 2017**Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

7 3.7% 9.3% 5.3% 21.2% 24.3% 22.9% 40.4% 34.2% 35.9% 32.7% 28.9% 32.9% 2.0% 3.3% 3.0% 3.3% 1.2%

8* 18.4% 18.2% 20.0% 30.8% 34.3% 24.0% 35.7% 32.6% 30.0% 15.1% 14.4% 26.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 5.2% 10.9%

ALG I 22.5% 15.5% 10.0% 36.3% 27.3% 22.0% 35.6% 40.4% 35.7% 5.6% 16.3% 31.3% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 16.8% 27.3%

GEO 8.0% 12.2% 10.0% 32.5% 34.8% 30.7% 38.0% 32.6% 35.3% 21.5% 23.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 0.2% 2.5%

ALG II 26.8% 31.9% 33.5% 36.1% 34.8% 23.0% 23.7% 20.8% 22.2% 13.4% 12.1% 20.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.8% 6.4% 7.9%

COMPARISON OF WARREN HILLS REGIONALSPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSMATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES

*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.Note: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding..

13

COMPARISON OF WARREN HILLS REGIONAL 2015 TO 2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5

Warren Hills Regional[Want to see less than the State]

2017 State

Warren Hills Regional[Want to see an increase compared to the

State] 2017State

Grade 7 5.0% 5.0% 6.5% 7.6%

Grade 8 5.1% 5.5% 5.3% 7.5%

Grade 9 3.9% 11.0% 12.2% 11.7%

Grade 10 10.9% 8.8% 12.5% 9.7%

Grade 11* 26.4% * 3.7% 27.1% * 2.6%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. - An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of

the % change from the previous year.Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

14

COMPARISON OF WARREN HILLS REGIONAL2015 TO 2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5

Warren Hills Regional [Want to see less than the State]

2017State

Warren Hills Regional[Want to see an increase compared to the

State] 2017 State

Grade 7 3.3% 2.1% 1.2% 2.8%

Grade 8 5.2% 3.8% 10.9% 4.2%

Algebra I* 16.8% 4.8% 27.3% 5.4%

Algebra II 6.4% 0.4% 7.9% 2.7%

Geometry 0.2% 9.0% 2.5% 7.4%

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.- An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

COM PARISON OF WARRE N H IL L S RE GIONALSP RING 2 017 TO STAT E OF NE W J E RSE Y 2 017

PARCC AD M INIST RAT IONSE NGL ISH L ANGUAGE ART S/L IT E RACY - P E RCE NTAGE S


(Level 1)


(Level 2)


(Level 3)


(Level 4)


(Level 5)

District State District State District State District State District State

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017

Grade 7 7.7% 8.9 17.4% 11.4 27.5% 20.5 37.6% 35.4 9.7% 23.8

Grade 8 12.3% 9.0 9.0% 11.6 18.7% 20.3 42.7% 40.5 17.3% 18.6

Grade 9 7.1% 12.8 16.3% 12.8 21.4% 22.9 45.9% 37.7 9.2% 13.8

Grade 10 18.9% 20.3 16.0% 13.9 22.1% 19.5 31.3% 32.2 11.7% 14.1

Grade 11* 31.2% 21.1 21.4% 18.0 23.7% 22.4 21.4% 29.7 2.3% 8.7

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 15

COMPARISON OF WARREN HILLS REGIONALSPRING 2017 TO STATE OF NEW JERSEY

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSMATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES


(Level 1)


(Level 2)


(Level 3)


(Level 4)


(Level 5)

District State District State District State District State District State

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017

Grade 7 5.3% 8.0 22.9% 19.9 35.9% 32.5 32.9% 33.9 3.0% 5.7

Grade 8* 20.0% 22.9 24.0% 21.4 30.0% 28.0 26.0% 26.9 0.0% 0.8

Algebra I 10.0% 12.2 22.0% 22.1 35.7% 24.2 31.3% 36.9 1.0% 4.5

Algebra II 33.5% 34.4 23.0% 21.4 22.2% 17.6 20.5% 23.6 0.0% 3.0

Geometry 10.0% 10.0 30.7% 29.0 35.3% 31.3 23.3% 25.8 0.7% 4.0

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 16

PARCC201520162017

17

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

DATA TRENDS

18

2015 2016 2017Warren Hills Regional School District 742 744 745

New Jersey 749 753 756

PARCC States 741 742 743

730

735

740

745

750

755

760

Aver

age

PAR

CC E

LA 0

7Warren Hills Regional District

ELA 07 Trends

19

6.5 9.9 7.7

23.614.2

17.4

28.5

30 27.5

32.935 37.6

8.510.9 9.7

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School District Performance Level Trends ELA 07

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

20




730

735

740

745

750

755

760

Aver

age

PAR

CC E

LA 0

8Warren Hills Regional School District

ELA 08 Trends

21

10.8 6.5 12.3

11.611.2

9

23.121.2

18.7

41.4

48.8 42.7

13.1 12.3

17.3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017


5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

22




730

735

740

745

750

755

Aver

age

PAR

CC E

LA 0

9Warren Hills Regional District

ELA 09 Trends

23

11.7 7.2 7.1

15.613.2 16.3

29.8

2221.4

36.1

44.745.9

6.8

12.89.2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017


5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

24

2015 2016 2017Warren Hills Regional School

District 731 739 741



726

728

730

732

734

736

738

740

742

Aver

age

PAR

CC E

LA 1

0

Warren Hills Regional School District ELA 10 Trends

25

23.6 14.6 18.9

22.2

18.616

23.6

26.9 22.1

21.5

30.631.3

9 9.311.7

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School DistrictPerformance Level Trends ELA 10

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

26




705

710

715

720

725

730

735

740

745

750

755

Aver

age

PAR

CC E

LA 1

1

Warren Hills Regional School DistrictELA 11 Trends

27

7.7 12.4 31.2

18.520.5

21.4

23.1

19

23.733.1

37.2

21.4

17.7

10.9

2.3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017


5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

PARCC 20152016 2017

28

MATHEMATICS DATA TRENDS

29




730

732

734

736

738

740

742

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional District MATH 07 Trends

30

4 9 521

2423

40

3436

3329

33

2 3 3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School District Performance Level Trends MATH 07

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

31





720

721

722

723

724

725

726

727

728

729

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional DistrictMATH 08 Trends

32

18 18 20

31 3424

3633

30

15 14

26

0 1 0

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School DistrictPerformance Level Trends MATH 08

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

33




720

725

730

735

740

745

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional District ALGEBRA 01 Trends

34





WH Midddle School 762 764 773

700

710

720

730

740

750

760

770

780

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional Middle School ALGEBRA 01 Trends

35




WH High School 716 726 730

700

705

710

715

720

725

730

735

740

745

750

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional High School ALGEBRA 01 Trends

36

16 12 10

2721

22

31

3536

25

32

41

0.4 1 1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School District Performance Level Trends ALGEBRA 01

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

37




722

724

726

728

730

732

734

736

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional School District GEOMETRY Trends

38

8 12 10

3235

31

38

33

35

21 2023

0 0.3 1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School District Performance Level Trends GEOMETRY

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

39




710

712

714

716

718

720

722

724

Aver

age

PAR

CC A

LG01

Warren Hills Regional School District ALGEBRA 02 Trends

40

27 32 33

36

35 23

2421

22

13 12

21

0 1 1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Warren Hills Regional School District Performance Level Trends ALGEBRA 02

5: Exceeded

4: Met

3: Approached

2: Partially Met

1: Did Not Yet Meet

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA ONGOING REFLECTION

¡How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction?

¡How will we use PARCC data as a tool to address areas in need of improvement or enhancement?

¡How can we provide additional resources and support for our educators to meet the learning needs of all our students?

41

PARCC201520162017

42

OVERARCHINGTHEMES

FROM THE DATA TRENDS

¡ There has been a significant increase in WHR students taking the PARCC when comparing Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC administrations.

¡ When comparing Warren Hills Regional to the PARCC Across-States’ and the State of New Jersey’s scale scores and performance levels, Warren Hills Regional is competitive and following the trends of the State.

¡ Warren Hills Regional continues to show significant progress in ELA/Literacy Grades 8 and 9 and Mathematics Algebra I:

ELA/Literacy 10 had the greatest reduction in Performance Levels 1 and 2 and the greatest increase in Performance Levels 4 and 5;Mathematics Algebra I WHR surpassed the State and had the largest improvement in Performance Levels 1 and 2 (16.8% to 4.8% respectively and the largest improvement in Performance Levels 4 and 5 (27.3% to 5.4% respectively).

43

OVERARCHING THEMES FROM THE DATA

¡ Warren Hills Regional continues to show significant progress in ELA/Literacy Grades 8 and 9 and Mathematics Algebra I:

ELA/Literacy 10 had the greatest reduction in Performance Levels 1 and 2 and the greatest increase in Performance Levels 4 and 5;

Mathematics Algebra I WHR surpassed the State and had the largest improvement in Performance Levels 1 and 2 (16.8% to 4.8% respectively and the largest improvement in Performance Levels 4 and 5 (27.3% to 5.4% respectively).

44

OVERARCHING THEMES FROM THE DATA

¡ When comparing both ELA/Literacy and Mathematics, whether it is PARCC Across-States, the State of New Jersey, or Warren Hil ls Regional, the average scale scores and the performance levels are consistent for ELA/Literacy and Mathematics overall ; however, for Mathematics, the average scale scores and per formance levels depict Algebra II as the area of most need of improvement.

¡ When comparing the 2015 through 2017 Grade Level Outcomes for Warren Hil ls Regional in ELA/Literacy, the percentage of per formance levels of 1 and 2 continues to decrease for grades 7, 8, 9, and 10. (Note: A decrease is desirable for Levels 1 and 2.)

¡ When comparing the 2015 through 2017 Grade Level Outcomes for Warren Hil ls Regional in Mathematics, the percentage of per formance levels of 1 and 2 for Algebra I decreases and increases for per formance levels 4 and 5. (Note: A decrease is desirable for Levels 1 and 2.)

45

OVERARCHING THEMES FROM THE DATA(CONTINUED)

¡ Continue to increase the progress in the PARCC par ticipation rate ;

¡ Examine the ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Per formance Levels and scale scores and establish high priority areas of need, along with areas of strength based on the PARCC Evidence Statements ;

¡ Inform the ELA and Mathematics Department members about ways to use the Evidence Statements Analysis Repor t data in order to inform curriculum and instruction during their 2017-2018 Professional Learning Communities (PLC) meetings;

¡ Uti l ize PLC t ime to address the integration of action i tems into curriculum and instruction and oversee the implementation and evaluation; and

¡ Continue with the Warren Hi l ls Cluster Curriculum Committee (WHCCC) and share PARCC data trends in order to establ ish focus areas for the 2017-2018 school year.

46

SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE NEXT STEPS

General Information for Parents

47

PARCC RESOURCES

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

¡ Ac c e s s m any m ate r i a l s fo r b ot h s t u de n t s an d p are n t s on ou r d i s t r i c t we b s i te www.war ren h i l l s .o r g a nd r e fe r to ea c h s c ho o l ’ s ho m e p a g e , le f t s id e Q u i c k l i n ks fo r PA RC C Res o u rc es .

PARCC Assessments at Warren Hil ls

¡ Welc o m eO u r d is t r i c t ho p es t ha t yo u w i l l f ind t h i s web s i te u s e fu l a s yo u a nd yo u r c h i ld r en p r ep a r e fo r t he PA RC C A s s es s m ent s . We u p d a te t h es e p a g es in a t im e ly m a n n er in o r d er to p rov id e t h e im p o r t a n t in fo r m a t io n yo u need in o r d er to a c h ieve s u c c es s o n t hes e a s s es s m ent s . P lea s e u s e t he m enu s o n t he le f t to nav ig a te t h i s s i te .

¡ G ener a l I n fo r m a t io n a b o u t PA RC C A s s es s m ent sNew J e r s ey i s a m em b er o f t he Pa r t ner s h ip fo r A s s es s m ent o f Rea d ines s fo r C o l leg e a nd C a r eer s (PA RC C ) c o ns o r t iu m , t her e fo r e a l l NJ p u b l i c s c ho o ls , inc lu d ing Wa r r en H i l l s Reg io na l s c ho o ls , w i l l b e a d m in is te r ing t he PA RC C A s s es s m ent s in A p r i l 2017. PA RC C w i l l b e a d m in is te r ed to s t u d ent s in G r a d es 7 -11 . Th e PA RC C A s s es s m en t s tes t s t u d en t s ' m a s te r y o f t he S t a nd a r d s fo r E ng l i s h L a ng u a g e A r t s , M a t hem a t ic s , a nd E ng l i s h L a ng u a g e A r t s fo r H is to r y/S o c ia l S c ienc e a nd Tec hn ic a l S u b jec t s .

¡ I t i s t he exp ec t a t io n o f t he Bo a r d o f E d u c a t io n , Ad m in is t r a t io n , a nd Fa c u l t y o f t he Wa r r en H i l l s Reg io na l S c ho o l D is t r i c t t ha t s t u d ent s in G r a d es 7 -11 w i l l t a ke t he PA RC C A s s es s m ent s fo r t he i r g r a d e leve l .

¡ I m p o r t a n t Bu l le t ins A b o u t PA RC C f ro m t he NJ a nd US D ep a r t m ent s o f E d u c a t io n a r e u p d a ted a nd p o s ted r eg u la r l y.

48

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

¡ Information on the new 2017 PARCC Student Reports: www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/

¡ Understanding the student score reports (with translations): understandthescore.org/

S a m p l e r e p o r t49

Dawn A . Moore

WHRSD Ass istant

Super intendent for Curr iculum and Instruct ion

and

Keith DennisonHeather Apple

Super v isors

50

THANK YOU!

PARCC Year 3 Results: Spring 2017 Administrations€¦ · Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not...

Documents

Transcript of PARCC Year 3 Results: Spring 2017 Administrations€¦ · Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not...