Paper Review Form
2
Research Paper Review Form Reviewer’s name: Title of the paper being reviewed: Paper’s author: For each question, please use the following scale to answer (place an x in the space provided): 0 Fails by a large amount 1 Fails by a small amount 2 Succeeds by a small amount 3 Succeeds by a large amount 4 Not applicable a) The paper is well written and it is easy to understand: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__ b) The technical information presented in the paper was interesting and worth reading: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__ c) The conclusions were supported by the body of the paper. 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__ d) The references are sufficient and relevant: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__ e) How strongly do you recommend this paper for the CCSU Graduate Conference? 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__ f) Please give a frank account of the strengths and weaknesses of the article (in 200-300 words): g) Please provide detailed suggestions on how to improve the paper (in 100-200 words): h) Is the reference section informative? Are the references accurate? (Explain in 50-100 words):
description
Research Paper Review Form
Transcript of Paper Review Form
Research Paper Review FormReviewer’s name:
Title of the paper being reviewed:
Paper’s author:
For each question, please use the following scale to answer (place an x in the space provided):
0 Fails by a large amount1 Fails by a small amount2 Succeeds by a small amount3 Succeeds by a large amount4 Not applicable
a) The paper is well written and it is easy to understand: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__
b) The technical information presented in the paper was interesting and worth reading: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__
c) The conclusions were supported by the body of the paper. 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__
d) The references are sufficient and relevant: 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__
e) How strongly do you recommend this paper for the CCSU Graduate Conference? 0 __1 __2 __3 __4__
f) Please give a frank account of the strengths and weaknesses of the article (in 200-300 words):
g) Please provide detailed suggestions on how to improve the paper (in 100-200 words):
h) Is the reference section informative? Are the references accurate? (Explain in 50-100 words):
i) Is the abstract informative? Does it reflect the body of the paper? (Explain in 50-100 words):
