Panta Rhei Report Brasov, Romania 20th – 22nd October 2009 Secretariat of Panta Rhei.
-
Upload
valentine-atkinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
6
Transcript of Panta Rhei Report Brasov, Romania 20th – 22nd October 2009 Secretariat of Panta Rhei.
Panta Rhei Report
Brasov, Romania
20th – 22nd October 2009
Secretariat of Panta Rhei
SAPS in Romania
1.2 million farmers applying for SAPS.2% of them applies for more than 60% of the
arable land.
Tour de table
Open source products
– a wide variety between MS, from “not at all” to “wide extent”
Payments in advance
- made in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Netherlands Romania, Spain and to some extent in Wales
eGovernment in Czech Republic
Presentation about ”Data boxes” -
a communication standard for electronic exchange for national institutions and companies authorised in the company register
This topic about eGovernment will continue next time with presentations from Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden
LPIS Quality work in Sweden
Management and technical aspects of the inventory work of about 1 million parcels
• Office inventory on screen • On- the spot inventory of pasture-land • Test of new technology (laser scanning)
Every block drawn up on the screen costs 5 €
Every block drawn up after a field visit field costs67 €
In addition, 10 € per block for managing, IT-systems, administration
eArchive in Belgium and Netherlands
Common Priorities– Electronic communication with applicants– Single collection and multiple use of data– Customer-driven and efficient working
procedures– Digitalisation of internal working
procedures
eArchive BE and NL
Lessons learned
• For OCR (optical character recognition)– Paper Forms need to be designed for OCR– High quality cannot be achieved instantly
• For “No more paper forms”– big or double computer screens!
• Scan and application side by side– Major change for all in the organisation
• E.g. electronic task list instead of pile of paper• Communication is important!
eArchive BE and NL
Conclusions
• Your strategy depends on circumstances and organizational/political choices (scalability, only e-declarations)
• Online application gives automatic checks and drastic decrease of administrative follow-up
• OCR is a temporary solution towards online applications
• Investments have to be made in staff education and the workplaces
Conclusions from work shops
InteroperabilityDiscussion about legal framework, organization
within MS, technical and IT-security issues
OutsourcingImportant to have milestones to detect deviation
from plans
Internal staff for project management and business analysis
Preference to outsource the technical staff
No paper forms, DK, NL
No paperforms, only an identification code. Paper form only on request.
Very good results, Denmark (from 64 to 87%) Netherlands (from 40 to 70%) e-applications
Necessary to have good support and coaching for how to use the e-service
How and when achive 100% e-applications?
Report from the Commission
ISAMM Status reportISAMM (Information System for Agriculture Market
management and Monitoring)
Service orientation and interoperability are keywords
Will go in production January 2010 for a limited number of forms. The whole system will have 800 different forms
Mandatory e-application is possible – decision for the member state
Thank you for your attention!
Christina HuhtasaariSwedish Board of Agriculture
www.jordbruksverket.sewww.panta.org
E-mail: [email protected]: +46 70 346 62 60