Pang-Wei Liu 1, Roger De Roo 2, Anthony England 2,3, Jasmeet Judge 1 1. Center for Remote Sensing,...
-
Upload
nora-sullivan -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Pang-Wei Liu 1, Roger De Roo 2, Anthony England 2,3, Jasmeet Judge 1 1. Center for Remote Sensing,...
1
Understanding Soil Moisture Transport In Sandy Soils Using Multi-Frequency
Microwave Observations
Pang-Wei Liu1, Roger De Roo2, Anthony England2,3,
Jasmeet Judge1
1. Center for Remote Sensing, Agri. and Bio. Engineering, U. of Florida
2. Atmosphere, Oceanic, and Space Sciences, U. of Michigan
3. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, U. of Michigan
UFUNIVERSITY of
FLORIDA
Outline
Introduction & MotivationMicroWEX-5MB ModelMethodologyResultsConclusions
2
Introduction & MotivationSoil moisture (SM) is an important factor
In hydrology: evapotranspiration, infiltration, surface runoff, and groundwater recharge.
In agriculture: crop growth and yield.
Satellite missions for SM: AMSR-E, NASA and JAXA, 2002
– V- & H-pol passive at C-band.– Spatial resolution at 6.25-57km and repeat coverage in 1-2 days.
SMOS, ESA, Nov. 2009.– V- & H-pol passive at ~1.4GHz (L-band).– Spatial resolution at 40-50km and repeat coverage in 2-3 days
SMAP, NASA, Oct. 2014.– Active at 1.26 GHz and passive at 1.41GHz.– Spatial resolution of active at 1-3 km and of passive at ~40km and
repeat coverage in 2-3 days.
Provide TB for assimilation and soil moisture retrieval.
3
Introduction & Motivation
Problem: The near-surface SM is highly dynamic, particularly in sandy soils. Current forward microwave algorithms typically use SM averaged
over 0-5cm may result in unrealistic TB.
Objectives: To determine the vertical resolution of the soil moisture necessary
to provide realistic TB at L-band for bare soils. To utilize combined C- & L- band observations to determine the
surface roughness and moisture, and the vertical resolution in the soil.
4
Microwave Water and Energy Balance Experiments (MicroWEXs)
Series of season-long experiments conducted at a 9-acre field in NC Florida.
Fifth MicroWEX (MicroWEX-5): growing season of sweet corn from March 9 (DoY 68) through May 26 (DoY 146) in 2006
The bare soil period: from DoY 68 to 95; LAI < 0.3
Soil moisture and temperature values were observed every 15 minutes at the depths of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 120cm.
V- & H-pol. TB at C-band and H-pol. TB at L-band every 15 minutes.
Soil Texture Parameters
Porosity (m3/m3) 0.37
Sand (% by vol.) 89.4
Clay (% by vol.) 7.1
Silt (% by vol.) 3.5
5
Mesh board for soil roughnessLiDAR for soil roughness
Mesh Board
Correlation Length (cm)
rms Height (cm)
1 15.5 0.8
2 8.1 0.7
3 5.3 0.4LiDAR
Correlation Length (cm)
rms Height (cm)
1 11.3 0.7
2 9.1 0.7
3 3.0 0.46
MB ModelTypical Approaches
Radiative Transfer Equation: zero order approximation
TBsoil, p = Teff ∙ ep
– Teff Soil temperatures at surface (TIR) and deep layer (~50cm).
– ep= (1 - rp) rp (εr, roughness)
– εr (SM, soil texture) dielectric models: Dobson et al., 1996 and Mironov et al., 2009
Rough surface models– Semi-empirical model: Q-h model Wang & Choudhury, 1981 rp (εr, rmsh,
f, θ).
– Empirical model Wegmüller & Mätzler, 1999 rp (εr, rmsh, f, θ); 1-100GHz.
– Physically-based model: IEM (Fung et al., 1992) ep (εr, rmsh, cl, f, θ); applicable for wide range of surfaces.
7
Comparison with observations
VSM0-5 from MicroWEX-5 Soil porosity = 0.37 Rms height = 0.616 cm Correlation length = 8.4 cm Looking angle = 50o
8
MethodologyModifications in the MB model:
Soil:– Discrete layers with non-uniform temperature and SM.– Rough surface – Semi-infinite lower boundary
Sandy soils are more porous at the surface.– Top 1.5 cm divided into 7 layers.– 1.5 – 32.5 cm divided into 1cm thick layers.– > 32.5 cm layer thickness increases with depth
1st order RTE– Single reflection considered at each layer interface.– IEM model is applied at layer 1 - rough surface
– TB contributions from each layer combine to obtain the total TB
TB
9
Methodology
Refractive mixing model for ε– Modified Mironov’s model (2010)
Use C-band (6.7 GHz) TB observations to estimate
– Surface roughness rms height and correlation length– Soil porosity in top 1mm– SM in top 1mm
These parameters are used with the SM observation from lower layers to estimate H-pol. TB at L-band.
10
Results
Estimation of rms height, correlation length, and porosity in top 1mm
Provide the best estimate during the dry (SM1mm = 0.01) and the wet (SM1mm = 0.29) periods
The SM from 0-2.5cm linearly interpolated
-Rms height = 0.41cm -Correlation length = 8.4cm -Soil porosity = 0.55
SM at > 2.5cm from MicroWEX-5
11
Results
Estimation of SM in top 1mm.
SM in the top 1mm b/w breaking points linearly interpolated
Rms height = 0.41cm Correlation length = 8.4cm Soil porosity = 0.55
0.29 0.25 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01
MicroWEX-5Best estimation
12
Results
Comparison of SM in the top 1mm with 0-5 cm SM during MicroWEX-5
Soil porosity: 1mm = 0.55; rest layers =0.37SM profiles at wet, medium, and dry points
13
MicroWEX-5
ResultsComparison of:
TB from MicroWEX-5
Case1: TB using SM 0-5 cm from MicroWEX-5.
Case2: TB using best estimate of SM, porosity, and roughness in the top 1mm from C-band; SM from 1mm-2.5cm linearly interpolated; SM > 2.5cm from MicroWEX-5.
Case3: TB using average of the best estimate in the top 1mm from C-band and SM at 2.5cm from MicroWEX-5; SM > 2.5 cm from MicroWEX-5; SM in top 1mm at the time of event from C-band for up to 30minutes.
14
Results
Extension of methodology to the another drydown period from DoY 87.5-90.5
Estimation of SM in top 1mm.
0.32 0.28 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.01
MicroWEX-5Best estimation
15
SM in the top 1mm b/w breaking points linearly interpolated
Rms height = 0.41cm Correlation length = 8.4cm Soil porosity = 0.55
Comparison of SM in the top 1mm with 0-5 cm SM during MicroWEX-5
Soil porosity: 1mm = 0.55; rest layers =0.37SM profiles at wet, medium, and dry points
Results
16
MicroWEX-5
Results
17
Comparison of: TB from MicroWEX-5
Case1: TB using SM 0-5 cm from MicroWEX-5.
Case2: TB using best estimate of SM, porosity, and roughness in the top 1mm from C-band; SM from 1mm-2.5cm linearly interpolated; SM > 2.5cm from MicroWEX-5.
Case3: TB using average of the best estimate in the top 1mm from C-band and SM at 2.5cm from MicroWEX-5; SM > 2.5 cm from MicroWEX-5; SM in top 1mm at the time of event from C-band for up to 30minutes.
Conclusions
SM 0-5cm is not adequate for estimating realistic TB at L-band in sandy soils, particularly during and immediately following precipitation/irrigation events.
TB at C-band may be used to derive soil surface characteristics such as roughness, porosity, and SM.
TB at L-band may be obtained using the derived properties and the observations at 2cm.
Future work: Extending/generalizing the methodology for larger applicability.
18
Acknowledgment
NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program (NASA-THP-NNX09AK29G)
MicroWEX-5 was supported by the NSF Earth Science Division (EAR-0337277) and the NASA New Investigator Program (NASA-NIP-00050655).
19
Thank You For Attention
Questions??
20
While the soil saturated
21
The VSM at 1mm layer was set at 1% in dry period. - rmsh=0.616cm, cl=8.4cm - soil porosity = 0.5
22
The VSM at 1mm layer was set at 29% in the wet period. -rmsh=0.41cm, cl=8.4cm -Porosity = 0.5
23
ResultsComparison of radiative emission models.
1. Overall, 484 pairs of soil moisture and temperature profiles were applied.
2. The average difference is within 3K at L-band.
3. 1st order model was applied for further work.
24