Pamana Accomplishment Report 2015

8/17/2019 Pamana Accomplishment Report 2015

1/28

Progress ReportAs of 31 December 2015


2/28

PAMANA Progress Report 2015

Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process | 2

Introduction

In line with the goal of enabling communities affected by and vulnerable to armed conflict to returnto peaceful conditions where they can achieve their desired quality of life, the Government isadopting a two-pronged approach: (1) Track 1, which aims to achieve negotiated political settlement

of all internal armed conflicts, and, (2) Track 2, the Complementary Track, which seeks to address thecauses and impacts of all internal armed conflicts and other issues that affect the peace processthrough security, justice and development interventions focused on conflict-affected and conflict-vulnerable areas. The Complementary Track is primarily pursued through the PAyapa atMAsaganang PamanayaNAn (PAMANA) which is the national government’s convergence framework and program for peacebuilding and development in areas affected by and vulnerable to conflict.

PAMANA, as embodied in the Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016, was launched in 2011.PAMANA aims to achieve the following objectives: (1) Improve socio-economic conditions in areasaffected by and vulnerable to armed conflict through infrastructure development and focuseddelivery of goods and services; (2) Improve governance by enhancing institutional capacities ofnational government agencies and local government units to pursue peace and development inconflict-affected and conflict-vulnerable areas through capacitation on conflict-sensitive and peace-promoting approaches and enhancement of transparency and accountability mechanisms; and, (3)Empower communities and strengthen their capacities to address issues of conflict and peace throughactivities that promote social cohesion.

PAMANA as a Complementary Track

PAMANA complements the different peace tables:

GPH-Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) . PAMANA, although is not implemented in directsupport to the MILF peace process, seeks to contribute to this particular peace table by building thecapacities of local governments in Bangsamoro areas to deliver development programs and basicservices.

GPH-Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) . PAMANA was undertaken as a separate initiative ofthe Aquino Administration to assist communities with MNLF presence. These communities continueto experience underdevelopment even after the implementation of the development component ofthe 1996 Final Peace Agreement between the Government and the MNLF. Priority is given to Peaceand Development Communities or PDCs (transformed MNLF guerilla bases and positions) whichhave a higher level of social preparedness.

PAMANA provides social protection services on health and education for MNLF members and theirfamilies as well as livelihood support and access and production infrastructure to help improveeconomic development.

GPH-Communist Party of the Philippines/New Peopl e’s Army/National Democratic Front(CPP/NPA/NDF) . PAMANA in CPP-NPA-NDF (CNN) affected areas are meant to ensure that


3/28



communities benefit from peace dividends despite the stalled Peace Talks. PAMANA Projects bringdevelopment interventions that aim to improve the quality of life of communities, as well asimprovement in governance to ensure that local government units (LGU) pay attention to conflicttriggers and strengthen peace promoting interventions.

GPH-Cordillera Bodong Administration/Cordillera People’s Liberation Army CBA/CPLA) .PAMANA contributed to the transformation process of the CPLA from an armed group to anunarmed socio-economic entity, the Cordillera Forum for Peace and Development (CFPD) throughsocio-economic development interventions. On the ground, the transformation is represented bypeople’s organizations/livelihood associations of former CPLA members. These organizations are alsoopen to the participation and membership of non-CPLA members within their communities.PAMANA highlighted the government’s dedication to fulfill its commitments in line with the 2011Closure Agreement with the CBA-CPLA.

GPH- Rebolusyonaryong Partidong Manggagawang Pilipinas/Revolutionary Proletarian Army/AlexBoncayao Brigade-Tabara Paduano Group (RPM-P/RPA/ABB-TPG) . PAMANA will supportimplementation and completion of the Closure Agreement with the RPM-P/RPA/ABB-TPG andassist in the institutional transformation of this group into an unarmed political and socio-economicorganization that promotes the welfare of members and host communities.

PAMANA Program Accomplishments

The following is the status of PAMANA implementation as of 31 December 2015 with inputs fromthe PAMANA partner implementing agencies, namely: Commission on Higher Education (CHED),Department of Agriculture (DA) 1 , Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and AquaticResources (DA-BFAR), Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), Department of Interior and Local

Government (i.e., OPDS, BLGD, BLGS, NBOO), Department of Energy (DOE), Department of PublicWorks and Highways (DPWH) 2, Department of Social Welfare and Development (i.e., PAMANA-KC, SLP, PSB), National Irrigation Administration (NIA), National Electrification Administration(NEA), Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) and the Autonomous Region in MuslimMindanao (ARMM). Inputs from the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) 3 are stillbeing completed for consolidation.

Pillar 1: Building Foundations for PeacePillar 1 refers to macro-level policy reform interventions that support the establishment of thefoundations of peace building including governance and convergence interventions, social protectionfor former combatants and their next-of-kin, and support for indigenous peoples and othermarginalized sectors and capacity building of local governments.

1 Based on submission and results of validation meeting with DA-FPCMD on 11-12 February 2016.2 Status update validation ongoing.3 Data still being completed and consolidated.


4/28



Pillar 1 interventions are being implemented by implementing partner agencies, to wit: CHED,PhilHealth, DILG and NCIP.

Social Protection Packages for Form er Comb atants and/or Next-of K in

1. CHEDFor AY 2015-2016, the Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP) has endorseda total of 428 (85.60%) grant applications out of the 500 target grant applications to the CHED-Officeof Student Development and Services as of 9 December 2015. Of which, 415 grant applications wererecommended for funding while 13 grant applications were held in abeyance pending submission ofcorrected data. Table 1 shows a summary breakdown of endorsed grant applications in support of thepeace tables as of 9 December 2015:

Table 1. PAMANA-CHED Study Grant Program by Peace Table (4 th Quarter 2015)

AffiliationBeneficiaries

AY 2013-2014

Beneficiaries

AY 2014-2015

SubmittedApplications

AY 2015-2016CPLA

186

43 27RPA - 146 4 CNN 7 5MNLF 150 250

Total 186 200 428

The PAMANA Study Grant Program has been ongoing since AY 2013-2014. A total of 1,260 (84%)slots have been funded out of the 1,500 target slots as of 9 December 2015. Table 1A shows asummary of the overall status of the Study Grant Program implementation as of 9 December 2015:

Table 1A. PAMANA-CHED Study Grant Program by Academic Year (4 th Quarter 2015)

Academic Year

Original Allocation Continuing Allocation TotalTarget

BeneficiariesActual

Beneficiaries/Slots Funded

Balance TargetBeneficiaries

ActualBeneficiaries/Slots Funded

TargetBeneficiaries

ActualBeneficiaries/Slots Funded

AY 2013-2014

200 186 14 200 186

AY 2014-2015

200 200 0 200 200 400 400

AY 2015-

2016

500 415 85 400 259 5 900 674

Total900 801 600 459 1,500 1,260

89.00 76.50 84.00

4 RPA-TPG (46) and CPD (100) 5 Continuing grantees recommended by the CHED Regional Offices


5/28


6/28



3.1.1 Third Consultation Workshop on the Knowledge Products Development . As a follow-through to the consultation workshops held on 2-4 September 2015 and 24-25September2015, a third consultation workshop was conducted on 15-16 October 2015. The workshopaimed to (i) present the final draft of the Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC); (ii) finalize thecontent of the Facilitator’s Manual and the Mainstreaming Guidebook ; and, (iii) discuss the

delivery mechanisms for the capacity development intervention under the mainstreamingagenda. The schedule of the five-day National CDP Retooling was also finalized.Participants included representatives from the OPAPP, CWC, PCW, NCDA, DSWD, NCIP,GIZ-COSERAM, Miriam College, DBM, NEDA and DILG Central and RegionalCDP/PAMANA Focal Persons and the League of Municipalities of the Philippines.

3.1.2 National CDP Retooling on the Preparation of CDP of LGUs in Peace Process Areas(CPLA/RRA and CNN Clusters) . As one of the capacity development strategies under themainstreaming agenda, a series of national CDP retooling (trainer’s training) for DILGregional and provincial focal persons (CDP, PAMANA, GAD and Child-Friendly),PAMANA Area Managers and representatives of LGUs per conflict line was conducted tocomplement the policy (JMC) and the Knowledge Products (Mainstreaming Guidebook andFacilitator’s Manual) which are also being developed under this project.

The series of retooling training, through an in-depth training on tools and methodologiesvis-à-vis conflict sensitivity and analysis, aimed to produce a pool of CDP trainers who willprovide technical assistance in cascading the mainstreaming agenda in areas being targetedby the project (PAMANA Pillar 1 areas) and in turn produce LGUs that will serve as“Conflict-Sensitive LGU Champions ” and as resource persons in the eventual expansion ofthe project to other areas with similar concerns.

The first leg of the retooling series was conducted on 22-28 November 2015 in Cebu Cityfor the CPLA/RRA Cluster (Regions CAR, VI and VII). Although all regions wererepresented, not all LGUs under the CPLA/RRA Cluster were able to participate due toconflict in schedule. The second leg of the retooling series was conducted on 6-12December 2015 in Subic, Zambales for the CNN Cluster (Regions IV-A, IV-B, V, VI, VIII,XI and XIII) with additional representatives from Regions I, II, III and NCR. More than 200participants were trained. The third and last leg of the retooling series is set on 10-16January 2016 in Davao City for the BM Cluster (Regions IX, X, XI and ARMM), targeting totrain about 100 participants.

3.2 National Barangay Operations Office (NBOO) on capacity-building for LGUs to ensurefunctionality of Lupong Tagapamayapa and Barangay Human Rights Action Center

3.2.1 Institutionalizing Human Rights Action Teams in Pilot Cities and Municipalities. Theactivity is divided into three (3) clusters namely: Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. It aims toequip the C/MHRAcT with adequate knowledge and skills in handling issues on humanrights violations for the roll-out training activities at the barangay level. Cluster trainingactivities were completed as of end of December 2015.


7/28



The Luzon Cluster training was held on 16-20 November 2015 in Quezon City. The VisayasCluster training, on the other hand, was held on 23-27 November 2015 in Cebu City. TheMindanao Cluster was held on 1-5 December 2015 in Davao City. These cluster trainingactivities were attended by the following pilot LGUs:

Pilot AreasNo. of

BarangaysParticipants

Luzon Cluster1. Tanudan, Kalinga

(CAR)16 All DILG and CHR Regional Focal Person on

Human Rights in Luzon Provincial Focal Person on Human Rights in PilotAreas

City/Municipal LGOO in Pilot Areas Members of C/MHRAcTs:

o Municipal Administratoro Local Legal Officer

o Local Social Welfare and Development Officero Local Planning and Development Coordinatoro Local Health Officero Local Information Officero PNP Human Rights Affairs Officero School City Superintendent/ School District

Supervisor

2. Mulanay, Quezon(Region IV-A)

28

3. Gloria, OrientalMindoro(Region IV-B)

27

4. Casiguran,Sorsogon (RegionV)

25

5. Labo, CamarinesNorte (Region V)

52

Visayas Cluster1. Ibajay, Aklan

(Region VI)

35 All DILG and CHR Regional Focal Person on

Human Rights in Visayas Provincial Focal Person on Human Rights in PilotAreas


o Municipal Administratoro Local Legal Officero Local Social Welfare and Development Officero Local Planning and Development Coordinatoro Local Health Officero Local Information Officero PNP Human Rights Affairs Officero School City Superintendent/ School District

2. San Carlos City,NegrosOccidental

18

3. Can-Avid,Eastern Samar(Region VIII)

28

4. Lope De Vega,Northern Samar(Region VIII)

22

5. Matuginao,Western Samar

20

Mindanao Cluster1. Pagadian City,

Zamboanga delSur (Region IX)

54 All DILG and CHR Regional Focal Person onHuman Rights in Mindanao


8/28



Pilot AreasNo. of

BarangaysParticipants

2. Munai, Lanao delNorte (Region X)

26 Provincial Focal Person on Human Rights in PilotAreas


o City/Municipal Administratoro Local Legal Officero Local Social Welfare and Development Officero Local Planning and Development Coordinatoro PNP Human Rights Affairs Officer

3. Kabacan, NorthCotabato (Region

24

4. New Corella,Davao del Norte

20

5. Maco,Compostela

37

6. Esperanza,Agusan del Sur

47

7. City of Tandag,Surigao del Sur(Region XIII)

21

The cluster training was a four-day activity covering concepts and principles of humanrights with focus on the rights of vulnerable sectors and good local governance especially intimes of armed conflict and natural disasters with emphasis on the role of BHRAcTs. Thediscussion was divided into four (4) modules with a total of 10 sessions, as follows:

Module 1: Human Rights and Good Local Governanceo Session 1: Basic Concepts and Principles of Human Rightso Session 2: Human Rights in Good Local Governanceo Session 3: Strengthening of Human Rights at the LGUs through HRAC

Module 2: Human Rights and Good Local Governance in Times of Armed Conflict

and Natural Disasterso Session 4: International Humanitarian Law (IHL)/Law of Armed Conflict

(LOAC) and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) Module 3: Human Rights of Vulnerable Sectors

o Session 5: Women’s Rights o Session 6: Children’s Rightso Session 7: Indigenous People’s Rights (IPs) o Session 8: Rights of Peasants

Module 4: Defending Civil and Political Rightso Session 9: Custodial Rights and Enforced Disappearanceo Session 10: Anti-Torture Law

Resource persons were mostly tapped from the Commission on Human Rights, a partneragency, who has lawyers and experts on the topics to be discussed. The sessions generatedsubstantial inputs from the participants particularly on the JMC 2014-01 including: 1)change of terminologies, e.g., BHRAO to BHRAC and Barangay Chairman to PunongBarangay; and, 2) issuance of a supplemental document to the JMC stating that LGUs canadd members beyond what is prescribed in the JMC. The participants also shared theirpersonal experiences in their localities on issues encountered and how they responded to


9/28



these. As an output of the training, the participants were able to produce an Action Plan perLGU for the roll-out training at the barangay level in 2016.

3.3 Bureau of Local Government Supervision (BLGS) on training on peace and order and publicsafety plan

Due to technicalities encountered in the development of the Manual or Technical Guide Notes onthe Tools and Processes on Peace and Order and Public Safety (POPS) Planning, the manual wasnot accomplished within FY 2015. The Manual will be the Bureau’s main tool in providingcapacity development to the identified PAMANA areas to help them address local peace andsecurity issues. The Manual is expected to be fully developed by March 2016. Capacity buildingtraining activities/workshops intended for the PAMANA areas will follow immediately.

Support to Indigenous Peoples

4. NCIPThe NCIP supports initiatives aimed at addressing the marginal and vulnerable status of indigenouspeoples in identified provinces. These initiatives include (1) quick response programs; (2) issuance ofCertificates of Ancestral Domain Titles (CADTs); and, (3) formulation and enhancement of AncestralDomain Sustainable Development and Protection Plans (ADSDPP).

Pillar 2: Establishing Resilient Communities

Pillar 2 refers to Community-driven development (CDD) interventions aimed towards promoting theconvergent delivery of services and goods focused on households and communities. Community-

based interventions through development of cooperatives are also being provided for MNLFcommunities. Provision of shelter assistance for internally-displaced persons is also being undertakenunder this Pillar. CDD projects are designed to have social preparation and project identificationactivities during the first half of the year whereas implementation is usually undertaken during thesecond half of the year.

Pilar 2 is being implemented by implementing partner agencies, to wit: DSWD through the Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan-Comprehensive Integrated Delivery of Social Services (KALAHI-CIDSS) – PAMANA, LGU-Led Mechanism under the DSWD Protective Services Bureau and SustainableLivelihood Program (SLP), DA in partnership with the DAR through the PAMANA in AgrarianReform Areas (ARA), and DSWD-ARMM.


10/28



Comm unity-Driven Development CDD) Projects 6

1. DSWD1.1 KALAHI-CIDSS-PAMANA. A total of 3,109 (76.75%) of the 4,051 target PAMANA-KC sub-projects were completed as of 31 December 2015. Table 4 shows the summary of the status of physical

accomplishment of KALAHI-CIDSS -PAMANA as of 31 December 2015.

Table 4. KC-PAMANA Physical Accomplishment (4th Quarter 2015)

Year TargetStatus of Physical Accomplishment

Completed Ongoing Procurement PreparatoryNot YetStarted

Other

2015 787 7 27 461 299

3.43% 58.58% 37.99%

2014 1,200 8 1,056 122 2288% 10.17% 1.83%

2013 &2014

839 64 1977.11% 22.89%

2013 1,125 10 1,108 17

98.49% 1.51%2012 &

2013116

116100%

2012 582 11 580 2

99.66% 0.34%

2011 158 12 158

100%

Total 4,051 13 3,109 621 32176.75 15.33 7.92

6 CDD interventions are targeted to cover the provinces of Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi (ARMM); Quezon(Region IV-A); Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga Sibugay (Region IX); Camarines Norte, Masbate, Sorsogon (RegionV); Northern Samar, Samar (Region VIII); Lanao del Norte (Region X); Compostela Valley, Davao del Norte, Davao Oriental (Region XI);Cotabato, Sarangani, South Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat (Region XII); Agusan del Norte, Agusan del Sur, Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur(Region XIII) and the cities of Isabela (Basilan) and Butuan (Region XIII).7 Adjusted from 800 to 520 based on actual submitted RFRs as of 3 rd Quarter 2015 and to 787 as of 4 th Quarter 2015. All other areas (13) arecurrently in the Social Preparation Stage.8 Adjusted from 1,218 to 1,204 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report. Readjusted to 1,200 per 3 rd Quarter 2015 report. The target number of sub-projects is based on the region’s submitted Municipa l Inter-Barangay Form Resolution (MIBF). Adjustments refer to Regions V (from 272 to269) and VIII (from 64 to 63).9 Adjusted from 70 to 83 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report.10 Adjusted from 1,124 to 1,125 per 3 rd Quarter 2015 report. The target number of sub- projects is based on the region’s submitted MIBF. 11 Adjusted from 582 to 573 to correct budget year attribution. Adjustment refers to nine (9) barangays in Las Navas and budget years 2011and 2012. Total readjusted back to 582 per 4 th Quarter 2015 report.12 Adjusted from 149 to 158 to correct budget year attribution. Adjustment refers to nine (9) barangays in Las Navas and budget years 2011and 2012.13 Adjusted from 4,059 to 3,798 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report. Readjusted to 3,775 per 3 rd Quarter 2015 report. Readjusted to 4,051 per 4 th Quarter 2015 report.


11/28



1.2 LGU-Led Mechanism for PAMANA. A total of 824 (91.56%) of the 900 target PAMANA-LGULed sub-projects were completed as of 15 December 2015. Table 5 shows the summary of thestatus of physical accomplishment under the LGU-Led Mechanism for PAMANA as of 15December 2015.

Table 5. LGU-Led Mechanism for PAMANA Physical Accomplishment (4 th Quarter 2015)

Year Target

Status of Physical Accomplishment

Completed Ongoing Procurement 14 PreparatoryNot YetStarted

ForTermination/Terminated

2015 2414 6 4

58.33% 25.00% 16.67%

2014 268204 38 26

76.12% 14.18% 9.70%

2013 268

266 2

99.25% 0.75%

2012 340340

100%

Total 900824 46 30

91.56 5.11 3.33

1.3 Sustainable Livelihood Program. A total of 1,259 (75.75%) of the 1,662 target PAMANA-SLP sub-projects were completed as of 25 December 2015. For the past quarters of 2015, the DSWD-SLPhas shared change stories from the beneficiaries of PAMANA-SLP covered areas as well asconducted inter-region Exposure Trip which initially commenced with DSWD Field Officehosting delegates from Field Office XII, followed by Field Office XII hosting SLP Associations andRPMO staff from Field Office X, and concluded with Field Office X showcasing their SLP-PAMANA projects to the SLP Associations from Field Office IX. Table 6 shows the summary ofthe status of physical accomplishment under the SLP Program for PAMANA as of 25 December2015.

Table 6. PAMANA-SLP Physical Accomplishment (4th Quarter 2015)

Year Target



ForTermination/

Terminated

2015 722356 81 277 8

49.31% 11.22% 38.36% 1.11%2014 470 434 16 20

14 Refers to sub-projects classified both at preparatory and procurement phase.


12/28



Year Target




92.34% 3.40% 4.26%

2013 470469 115

99.79% 0.21%

Total 1,6621,259 97 298 8

75.75 5.84 17.93 0.48

2. DA and DARPAMANA-ARA allows the program to assist target communities that are agrarian reform areas withthe PAMANA peacebuilding fund to support community priority projects.

For FY2011-2014, PAMANA-ARA was implemented through the DAR. PAMANA-ARA wastransferred to the DA in FY2015. In line with this, a Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC) on theimplementation arrangements was signed by the DAR and DA. The JMC provides that the DA-Regional Offices administer the funds and afford operational support to DAR-Provincial Offices oncommunity consultations and orientation.

A total of 903 (49.16%) of the 1,837 target PAMANA-ARA sub-projects were completed as of 21December 2015. Table 7 shows the summary of the status of physical accomplishment of the AgrarianReform Community Development Project under PAMANA as of 21 December 2015.

Table 7. PAMANA-ARA Physical Accomplishment (4 th Quarter 2015)

Year TargetStatus of Physical Accomplishment



Department of Agriculture and Department of Agrarian Reform

2015 504504

100%Department of Agrarian Reform

2014 605 16 317 232 11 45

52.39% 38.35% 1.82% 7.44%

2013 636 17 505 34 76 20 1

79.40% 5.35% 11.95% 3.14% 0.16%

15 Refers to a previously cancelled FY2013 PAMANA Project due to armed conflict and revived using funds from FY2014 savings. FY2013allocation has lasped.16 Adjusted from 595 to 602 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report and to 605 per 4 th Quarter 2015 report. Seven (7) barangays have two (2) projectseach.17 Adjusted from 630 to 633 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report to 636 per 4 th Quarter 2015 report. Three (3) barangays have two (2) projects each.


13/28



Year Target




2012 57 18 47 1 2 7

82.46% 1.75% 3.51% 12.28%

2011 3534 1

97.14% 2.86%

Total 1,837903 268 89 576 1

49.16 14.59 4.84 31.36 0.05

3. DSWD-ARMMTable 8 shows the summary of the status of physical accomplishment of CDD projects under DSWD-ARMM as of 30 December 2015:

Table 8. ARMM CDD Physical Accomplishment (4th

Quarter 2015)

Year Target




Other

2015 1,7771,570 207

88.35% 11.65%

2014 386370 1619

95.85% 4.15%

2013 1,777 20 1,712 13 36 1621

96.34% 0.73% 2.03% 0.90%2013 386

381 3 2 22 98.70% 0.78% 0.52%

2012 386385 1

99.74% 0.26%

Total 4,7122,848 17 1,570 207 54 16

60.44 0.36 33.32 4.39 1.15 0.34

18 Adjusted from 55 to 56 per 2 nd Quarter 2015 report to 57 per 4 th Quarter report. One (1) barangay has three (3) projects.19 Three (3) of the 16 projects indicated herein refer to projects for implementation in Lanao del Sur (Brgy Mansilano, Bumbaran; BrgyPanalawan, Bubong; Brgy Paigoay, Pagayawan) which were previously reported as terminated due to peace and order situation in thecommunity and reinstated per 4 th Quarter 2015 report.20 Expansion projects/barangays. Only 1,761 projects/barangays are funded out of the 1,777 target projects/barangays.21 Unfunded target projects/barangays as of the reporting period.22 Refers to reinstated target sties in Lanao del Sur (Brgy Mansilano, Bumbaran; Brgy Paigoay, Pagayawan) per 4 th Quarter 2015 report.These areas were previously reported as terminated due to peace and order situation in the community.


14/28



Of the 13,162 adjusted overall target CDD sub-projects as of 4th Quarter 2015, 8,943 (67.95%) sub-projects were completed, with 1,049 (7.97%) ongoing, 1,987 (15.10%) in the procurement phase and1,112 (8.45%) in the preparatory phase. Tables 9 and 9A show a summary of Pillar 2 physicalaccomplishment by year and agency as of the reporting period.

Table 9. Pillar 2 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Year – FY 2011-2015 (4thQuarter 2015)

Year Target




Other

2015 3,814397 548 1,851 1,018

10.41% 14.37% 48.53% 26.69%

2014 2,9292,381 408 57 67 16

81.29% 13.93% 1.95% 2.29% 0.54%2013 &

201483

64 19

77.11% 22.89%2013 4,662

4,441 69 77 20 39 1695.26% 1.48% 1.65% 0.43% 0.84% 0.34%

2012 &2013

116116

100%

2012 1,3651,352 4 2 7

99.05% 0.29% 0.15% 0.51%

2011193 192 1

99.48% 0.52%

Total13,162

23

8,943 1,049 1,987 1,112 55 16

67.94 7.97 15.10 8.45 0.42 0.12

Table 9A. Pillar 2 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Agency - FY 2011-2015 (4 th Quarter 2015)

Year Target




Other

DSWD-KC

4,0513,109 621 321

76.75% 15.33% 7.92%DSWD-LGU-LED

900824 46 30

91.56% 5.11% 3.33%DSWD

-SLP1,662

1,259 97 298 875.75% 5.84 17.93% 0.48%

23 Adjusted from 13,163 to 12,879 due to adjustments made to DSWD-KC targets for 2014 and 2015. Readjusted to 13,162 per 4 th Quarter2015 reports.


15/28



Year Target




Other

DAR 1,837903 268 89 576 1

49.16% 14.59% 4.84% 31.36% 0.05%DSWD

-ARM

M

4,712

2,848 17 1,570 207 54 16

60.44% 0.36% 33.32% 4.39% 1.15% 0.34%

Total13,162

24 8,943 1,049 1,987 1,112 55 16

67.94 7.97 15.10 8.45 0.42 0.12

Figure 1. Pillar 2 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Status and Agency 25 for FY 2011-2015,Share (4 th Quarter 2015)

In 2012, a total of PhP230 million was also allocated for the construction of 2,300 core shelter units inMaguindanao under the DSWD through ARMM-DSWD in partnership with Habitat for HumanityPhilippines. Out of the 2,300 target core shelter units, 1,751 were constructed, 89 ongoing and 460not yet started as of 31 January 2015. DSWD-DReAMB is coordinating with the ARMM-DSWD for

data updating.

24 Adjusted from 13,163 to 12,879 due to adjustments made to DSWD-KC targets for 2014 and 2015. Readjusted to 13,162 per 4 th Quarter2015 reports.25 Representing share in completed projects as of the reporting period.

COMPLETED8,943

67.95%

ONGOING1,0497.97%

PROCURE-MENT1,987

15.10%

PREPARA-TORY1,1128.45%

NOT YETSTARTED

550.42%

OTHER16

0.12% DSWD-KC3,10935%

DSWD-LGU-LED

8249%

DSWD-SLP

1,25914%

DAR90310%

DSWD-ARMM2,84832%


16/28



PAMANA for Moro National Liberation Front Communities PAMANA for MNLF communities focuses on the provision of socio-economic and developmentinterventions in support of the implementation of the 1996 GPH-MNLF Final Peace Agreement.

For CY 2014, the ORG-ARMM is mandated to implement socio-economic development projects in

180 communities identified and validated by the military as MNLF communities and applied asPAMANA beneficiaries. The 180 MNLF communities cover areas in Maguindanao (35), Lanao delSur (41), Basilan (28), Sulu (52) and Tawi-Tawi (24).

Projects are being implemented in partnership either by contract, administration or memorandum ofagreement with line agencies. The ORG-ARMM also works in partnership with the CooperativeDevelopment Authority for the conduct of capacity building and skills training including cooperativedevelopment and management, leadership skills training, simple bookkeeping and accounting fornon-accountants, and livelihood.

In September 2014, the PAMANA-ARMM PMO and heads of partner implementing agencies (e.g.,CDA-ARMM, DPWH-ARMM, BFAR-ARMM, DAF-ARMM, DAF-PAO Basilan) signed aMemorandum of Agreement to facilitate faster delivery and distribution of project items for theMNLF communities.

Table 10 shows the summary of projects implemented under the Memorandum of Agreement as ofthe reporting period.

Table 10. Status of Projects Implemented under the Memorandum of Agreement (4th Quarter 2015)

Agency Name of ProjectProject Cost

(PhP)Remarks

CDA-ARMM Capacity Buildingand SkillsTraining

22,093,300 - Funds released to CDA-ARMM on 25September 2014 (PhP14M) and 25 March2015 (PhP8M)

- Ongoing- Serves 180 MNLF communities

BFAR-ARMM FishingEquipment andFacilities(i.e., fishing vesselwith engine,payao, motorizedboats, non-motorized boats,establishment offresh water fishcage and feeds)

5,432,692 - FY2014- Funds released to BFAR-ARMM on 18

February 2015- 1 project completed/delivered and 1 project

to be delivered in Tawi-Tawi- 1 project completed/delivered and 1 project

to be delivered in Sulu- Serves four (4) MNLF communities in Tawi-

Tawi (2) and Sulu (2)

56,004,837 - FY2015- Funds requested from DBM under List of Due


17/28




(PhP)Remarks

and Demandable Accounts Payable (LDDAP)- 1 project ongoing in Sulu, 1 project ongoing

in Tawi-Tawi, 1 project ongoing in

Maguindanao- Aims to serve a total of 50 MNLF

communities in Sulu (27), Tawi-Tawi (18)and Maguindanao (5)

DAF-ARMM LivelihoodProjects(i.e., agriculturalinputs, livestockproduction, pre-post harvest

facilities)

18,432,180 - FY2014- Funds released to DAF-ARMM on 22

October 2014- Remaining 7% of the funds is on process for

payment to the supplier under Small ValueProcurement such as pesticides, nails, posts

and vaccines- Some of the items requested were deliveredto the MNLF communities in Sulu (with 33completed/delivered agricultural productionsupport items), Tawi-Tawi (with 9completed/delivered agricultural productionsupport items), and Lanao del Sur (with 11completed/delivered agricultural productionsupport items)

- Serves 10 MNLF communities in Lanao delSur (1), Tawi-Tawi (3) and Sulu (6)

552,964.40 - Funds released on 6 May 2015- MOA addendum of 3% mobilization

(Contract Price: PhP18,432,180)77,076,075 - FY2014

- Funds released to DAF-ARMM on 12 March2015

- 13 projects completed/delivered inMaguidanao (target: 13)

- 1 project ongoing and 3 projects for deliveryin Sulu (target: 8)

- 1 project completed/delivered and 1 fordelivery in Tawi-Tawi (target: 5)

- 5 projects completed/delivered in Lanao delSur (target: 10)

- Aims to serve 63 MNLF communities in Sulu(20), Tawi-Tawi (13), Lanao del Sur (10) andMaguindanao (20)

2,312,282.2 - Funds released on 6 May 2015


18/28




(PhP)Remarks

5 - MOA addendum of 3% mobilization(Contract Price: PhP77,076,075)

53,452,237 - FY2014- Bidding process completed. Suppliers

identified. Supporting documents submittedto ARMM-ORG for funding request to DBM

- Aims to serve 52 MNLF communities in Sulu(21), Maguindanao (7) and Lanao del Sur (24)

DAF-PAOBasilan

LivelihoodProjects(i.e., agriculturalinputs, livestockproduction, pre

and post-harvestfacilities)

38,509,444 - FY2014- Funds released to DAF-PAO Basilan on 10

October 2014- Delivered project items to 18 organized

MNLF cooperatives in Basilan

1,155,283.32

- Funds released on 25 August 2015- MOA Addendum of 3% mobilization

(Contract Price: PhP38,509,444)12,036,328.

80- FY2014- Remaining 20.37% to be requested from

DBM. Supporting documents are beingconsolidated for submission to DBM throughthe ARMM-ORG

- Aims to serve 12 MNLF communitiesDPWH-ARMM

SmallInfrastructures(i.e., warehouse,solar dryer, opencourt forcommunity, deepwell watersystem, multi-purpose center,potable water

supply)

38,370,000 - FY2014- 50% of the funds downloaded to DPWH-

ARMM District Engineering Offices on 12February 2015

- Over 50 projects (e.g., agricultural productionsupport, community infrastructure, water)are ready for implementation. Projectimplementation ongoing- 6 projects ready for implementation in

Lanao I and Lanao II

-

11 projects ongoing, 4 projects not yetstarted in Maguindanao- 18 ongoing projects, 5 projects ready for

implementation in Sulu- 9 projects ready for implementation in

Tawi-Tawi- 1 project ready for implementation in

Basilan


19/28




(PhP)Remarks

- Aims to serve 43 MNLF communities inTawi-Tawi (9), Sulu (18), Lanao del Sur (4),Maguindanao (11) and Basilan (1)

34,800,000 - FY2014- Over 50 projects (e.g., agricultural production

support, community infrastructure, water)- 12 projects for bidding in Maguindanao- 13 projects for bidding in Tawi-Tawi- 28 projects for bidding in Sulu

- Aims to serve 45 MNLF communities in Sulu(26), Tawi-Tawi (11) and Maguindanao (8)

Total 360,227,623.77

Pillar 3: Promoting Sub-Regional Economic DevelopmentPillar 3 refers to regional and sub-regional development interventions that link conflict-affected andconflict-vulnerable areas to markets and promote jobs and livelihood generation. These specificallyrefer to interventions that address local development challenges including constraints to localeconomic development, economic integration of poor areas with more prosperous areas, and physicaland economic connectivity improvements. PAMANA provides socio-economic development supportto areas that will not have been prioritized under regular agency programs.

Pillar 3 interventions are being undertaken by implementing partner agencies, to wit: DA, DENR,DILG, DOE, DPWH, DA-BFAR, DOE-NEA, DA-NIA, DAF-ARMM, BFAR-ARMM, DILG-ARMM,

DENR-ARMM, DPWH-ARMM and Office of the Regional Governor-ARMM in partnership withLGUs. Indicated below is the breakdown of sub-regional development projects across implementingagencies, year of implementation and project cycle stages.

Table 11. Agency Physical Accomplishments – FY 2011-2015 (4thQuarter 2015)

Year Target




Other

OPAPP in partnership with LGUs201

1 13126 125 4 1 1

95.42% 3.05% 0.76% 0.76%Tota

l131

125 4 1 195.42 3.05 0.76 0.76

26 No movement since the 3 rd Quarter of 2014.


20/28



Year Target




Other

DA27

2015

120 1 29 81 928

0.83% 24.17% 67.5% 7.5%201

4297

30 174 83 10 29 10.10% 58.585% 27.95% 3.37%

2013

126 57 41 5 5 30 1831

45.24% 32.54% 3.97% 3.97%14.28

%201

219

16 232 133 84.21% 10.53% 5.26%

Tota

l562

104 244 169 7 38

18.505 43.42 30.07 1.245 6.76DA-BFAR 34 201

526

2 2 16 6 35 7.69% 7.69% 61.54% 23.08%

2014

101 6 236 137

10% 60% 20% 10%

27 New entry. Status update as of December 2015. Data based on validation meeting with DA-FPCMD on 11-12 February 2016. DA-FPCMD is awaiting reconfirmation from Regional Offices including status of projects under “Other”.28 Status updates (FY2015 PAMANA) still being revalidated by DA-FPCMD. 29 Status updates (FY2014 PAMANA) still being revalidated by DA-FPCMD.30 Refers to (1) Construction of Buaya FMR in Balbalan, Kalinga upon request of the MLGU due to non-implementation by the contractor;(2) Construction of Lower Mangali Agricultural Tramline (Pasil) in Tanudan, Kalinga due to incurrence of negative slippage and expirationof contract time; (3) Construction of Tulgao West Tramline in Tinglayan, Kalinga due to incurrence of negative slippage, expiration ofcontract time and abandonment of contract works at the site; (4) Construction of Basao Agricultural Tramline due to incurrence of negativeslippage and expiration of contract time; and, (5) Construction of Mogao-Tuyakap Agricultural Tramline in Bakun, Bneguet due toexpiration of contract time.31 Status updates (FY2013 PAMANA) still being revalidated by DA-FPCMD.32 Refers to (1) Construction of Dacalan FMR in Taduyan, Kalinga which is due for termination due to incurrence of negative slippage andabandonment of contract works at the site; and, (2) Opening of Bangaan FMR in Sagada, Mountain Province which was reportedlyterminated. Status is being revalidated.33 Refers to (1) Construction of Pide-Fidelisan FMR in Sagada, Mountain Province. Status is being revalidated by DA-FPCMD.34 Culled out from DA. Status update as of December 2015 and as reported by BFAR.35 Refers to (1) FY2015 PAMANA PHF for Rice and Seaweed Farmers Project for Brgy. Muricay, Pagadian City, Zamboanga del Sur. PerBFAR, project is ineligible; (2) Agricultural Productivity Support Project in Sinawilan, Santa Cruz, Davao del Sur. LGU has officiallyexpressed to drop the project. Project beneficiaries are not residents of the target barangay; (3) Agricultural Productivity Support Project inTibanban, Governor Generoso, Davao Oriental. LGU has officially expressed to drop the project. Only two (2) of the 28 target beneficiariesare seemed to be bonafide residents of the target barangay; (4) Bagoong Processing Plant and Production, (5) Cold Storage/Mini Ice Plant,and (6) Freshwater Fishing Facilities for Cotabato City. Dropped as per OPAPP validation, 36 Refers to (1) Fish Cage Project for Sapu Masla, Malapatan, Sarangani Province. LGU was unable to comply with required documentation;and (2) Municipal Coastal and Fisheries Support Project in Palimbang, Sultan Kudarat. 37 Refers to Fish Cages Establishment Project for Tukuran, Zamboanga del Sur which is pending for replacement. Per assessment, project isnot feasible due to exposure to big waves and strong winds (e.g., southwest monsoon). It was recommended that the project be changed toFAD-assisted fishing.


21/28



Year Target




Other

201

310

5 5

50% 50% 10%Tota

l46

6 7 2 22 8 113.04 15.22 4.35 47.83 17.39 2.17

DA-NIA/NIA 38 201539

22

100%

2014

151 11 3 40

6.67% 73.33% 20%

201

341

6

6

100%2012

21 1

50% 50%Tota

l2542

7 4 11 328 16 44 12

DENR201

53

1 243 33.33% 66.67%

2013

1212

100%

Total

1544 12 1 280.00 6.67 13.33

DILG45 201 155 12 43 33 66 1 46

38 Culled out from DA. Data based from NIA submission for the 4 th Quarter 2015 and validation meeting with DA-FPCMD on 11-12February 2016. DA-FPCMD is awaiting reconfirmation from concerned Regional Offices including status of the four (4) projects under“For Termination/Terminated” and “Other”.39 Implemented and reported by NIA.40

Refer to (1) Irrigation Development Project in Demoloc, Malita, Davao Occidental (for validation); (2) Spring Development inPagayawan, Bacolod, Lanao del Norte (for replacement); and,(3) Expansion of Irrigation Line Canal in Baliton, Glan, Sarangani Province(for validation).41 Implemented and reported by NIA.42 Adjusted from 8 to 26 to include DA-NIA projects which are being reported by DA. Additional data based from validation meeting withDA-FPCMD on 11-12 February 2016. 43 Breakdown for revalidation with DENR-FMB.44 Adjusted from 19 to 15 per 2013 data revalidation with DENR.45 Status update as of 17 December 2015.46 Refers to Water System Project in Kumalarang, Zamboanga del Sur due to financial constraint. The MLGU was unable to providecounterpart funds.


22/28



Year Target




Other

5 7.74% 27.74% 21.29% 42.58% 0.65%

2014

111 47 43 29 20 18 1 48 38.74% 26.13% 18.02% 16.21% 0.90%

2013

10291 5 3 3 49

89.22% 4.90% 2.94% 2.94%201

2309

275 11 1 13 9 50 89% 3.56% 0.32% 4.21% 2.91%

Total

67751 421 88 57 97 14

62.19 13.00 8.41 14.33 2.07DOE52 201

56

6

100%201

47

7100%

Total

137 6

53.85 46.15DPWH 53 201

54

3 175.00% 25.00%

2012

44

100%

Total

8 4 3 150.00 37.50 12.50

NEA54 201 57 22 4 27

47 Adjusted from 116 to 113 as of the 2 nd Quarter 2015 report. Readjusted to 111 as of 4 th Quarter 2015 report.48 Refers to Water Supply Project for Munai, Lanao del Norte amounting to PhP60,000. Approved allocation was very minimal and deemednot enough to complete an operational water system.49 Refers to (1) Spring Development (Level II) for Resettlement Site in Negros Occidental (funds reverted); (2) Water System for NegrosOccidental (funds reverted); and, (3) Installation of Water System for Negros Occidental (funds reverted). 50 Refers to (1) Development of Settlement Site for Aklan (funds reverted); (2) and Security Arrangements for Aklan; (3) Peace Dividendsfor Antique (funds reverted); (4) Livelihood Assistance for Antique (funds reverted); (5) Core Shelter or Other Assistance for Antique (fundsreverted); (6) Other Enabling Intervention such as common facilities for Antique (funds reverted); (7) In-situ Area Development in Maasin,Iloilo such as electricity, water and land (funds reverted); (8) Other Enabling Intervention such as common facilities for Iloilo (fundsreverted); and, (9) Other Enabling Intervention such as common facilities for Negros Occidental (funds reverted).51 Adjusted from 679 to 677 as of the 4 th Quarter 2015 report.52 Status update as of4th Quarter 2015 per letter dated 15 December 2015.53 Four (4) projects previously reported under “Other” moved under “Completed” as of August 2015 per confirmation/data validatio n withDPWH. Status update as f 2 nd Quarter 2015 report and as adopted for the 3 rd Quarter 2015. Status update as of 4 th Quarter 2015 still beingrevalidated.54 Status update as of 4 th Quarter 2014 per letter dated 16 December 2015.


23/28



Year Target




Other

5 Energized

38.60% 7.02% 47.37%4

Completed

7.02%

2014

25

7Energized

11

28% 44%7

Completed

28%

2013

65

21

Energized6 3 22

32.31% 9.23% 4.62% 33.85%13

Completed

20%Tota

l 14774 6 7 60

50.34 4.08 4.76 40.82ARMM55 201

51

1100%

2014

349 25

26.47% 73.53%201

339456

353 24 1 2 1489.59% 6.09% 0.25% 0.51% 3.55%

2012

657 5 1

83.33% 16.67%Tota

l435

367 50 1 1 2 1484.37 11.49 0.23 0.23 0.46 3.22

55 Project implementation is through ARMM Line Agencies and the ARMM-PAMANA Management Office.56 Adjusted from 359 to 394 based on units to be delivered as of 4 th Quarter 2015. Status update of the 14 projects under “Other” is underrequest. 57 Status update as of the 2 nd Quarter 2015. Status update for 4 th Quarter 2015 under request.


24/28



Overall, the PAMANA Program has a total of 2,059 sub-regional projects in different stages ofdevelopment as of the 4 th Quarter 2015. Of these, 1,127 (54.74%) projects were completed, 407(19.77%) are ongoing, 67 (3.25%) are in procurement phase and 306 (14.86%) are in preparatoryphase. Tables 12 and 12A show the summary of the status of physical accomplishment for sub-

regional development projects by year and agency as of the reporting period.

Table 12. Pillar 3 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Year – FY 2011-2015 (4thQuarter 2015)

YearTarget




Other

2015 374 58 39 80 40 170 29 7 9

10.43% 21.39% 10.70% 45.45% 7.75% 1.87% 2.41%

2014 499 59 104 229 20 118 11 3 14

20.84% 45.89% 4.01% 23.65% 2.20% 0.60% 2.81%

2013 715 60 558 81 6 5 23 10 32

78.04% 11.33% 0.84% 0.70% 3.22% 1.40% 4.47%

2012 340 61 301 13 1 13 11 1

88.53% 3.82% 0.29% 3.82% 3.24% 0.29%

2011131 125 4 1 1

95.42% 3.05% 0.76% 0.76%

Total 2,059 62 1,127 407 67 306 64 32 56

54.74 19.77 3.25 14.86 3.11 1.55 2.72

Table 12A. Pillar 3 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Agency FY 2011-2015 (4thQuarter2015)

Agency Target




Other

OPAPP 131125 4 1 1

95.42% 3.05% 0.76% 0.76%

DA 562104 244 169 7 38

18.51% 43.42% 30.07% 1.25% 6.76%

DA- 46 6 7 2 22 8 1

58 Adjusted from 254 to 374 per new entries under DA and DA-NIA.59 Adjusted from 189 to 499 per new entries under DA and DA-NIA.60 Adjusted from 589 to 715 per new entries under DA and DA-NIA.61 Adjusted from 319 to 340 per new entries under DA and DA-NIA,62 Adjusted from 1,482 as of the 3 rd Quarter 2015 to 2,059 as of the 4 th Quarter 2015 to include DA data and adjustments to project count.


25/28



Agency Target




Other

BFAR 13.04% 15.22% 4.35% 47.83% 17.39% 2.17%

DA-NIA/NI

A25

7 4 11 3

28.00% 16.00% 44.00%12.00

%

DENR 1512 1 2

80.00% 6.67% 13.33%

DILG 677421 88 57 97 14

62.19% 13.00% 8.41% 14.33% 2.07%

DOE 137 6

53.85% 46.15%

DPWH 84 3 1

50.00% 37.50% 12.50%

NEA 14774 6 7 60

50.34% 4.08% 4.76% 40.82%

ARMM 435367 50 1 1 2 14

84.37% 11.49% 0.23% 0.23% 0.46% 3.22%

Total2,059

63 1,127 407 67 306 64 32 56

54.74 19.77 3.25 14.86 3.11 1.55 2.72

Figure 2. Pillar 3 Summary of Physical Accomplishment by Status and Agency 64 for FY 2011-2015,Share (4 th Quarter 2015)

63 Adjusted from 1,482 as of the 3 rd Quarter 2015 to 2,059 as of the 4 th Quarter 2015 to include DA data and adjustments to project count. 64 Representing share in completed projects as of the reporting period.

COMPLETED1,127

54.71%

ONGOING407

19.76%

PROCUREMENT

673.25%

PREPARA-TORY306

14.85%

NOT YETSTARTED

643.11%

FORTERMINATION/TERMINATED

331.60%

OTHER56

2.72%

OPAPP125

11.09%

DA104

9.23%

DA-BFAR6

0.53%

DA-NIA/NIA

70.62%

DENR12

1.06%

DILG421

37.36%

DOE7

0.62%

DPWH4

0.35%

NEA74

6.57%

ARMM367

32.56%


26/28



Peace and Development Communities with Moro National Liberation Front Presence

Of the 217 projects earmarked for the MNLF Peace and Development Communities since 2011, 174projects have been completed. These include agricultural production support, road and communityinfrastructure projects which have been provided to 131 priority MNLF community groups. These

projects were identified through community consultations with the participation of local MNLFleaders and local government units, and were implemented by provincial and municipal localgovernments with a third party monitoring mechanism.

Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms (TAM)

The PAMANA TAM has five (5) components that provide information on the different mechanismsestablished to ensure transparency and accountability in PAMANA implementation:

1. PAMANA Feedback and Response System (PFRS) . The PFRS platform has been developedand is presently being pilot tested. The PFRS guidelines, which aim to enhance the voice ofcitizens in PAMANA implementation by providing them with opportunities to lodge theirfeedback regarding peacebuilding interventions of government and improve the capacities ofOPAPP in handling and responding to citizens’ feedback, have also been drafted.

2. Third Party Monitoring where CSOs are tapped as independent third party monitors of theimplementation process of PAMANA and training interventions are conducted to build thecapacities of PAMANA third party monitors in undertaking conflict-sensitive monitoring.

Following a review of the initial partnership with CSOs as third party monitors in 2012-2013,OPAPP is developing with assistance from the Affiliated Network for Social Accountability-

East Asia and the Pacific (ANSA-EAP) a program proposal that aims to capacitate citizens andother CSOs to highlight and enhance the peacebuilding component of the practice of socialaccountability in PAMANA. The engagement is geared towards the establishment of aCitizen-Led Monitoring mechanism for PAMANA that is envisioned to provide channels forcitizens in conflict-affected and conflict-vulnerable areas to undertake monitoring ofPAMANA projects. Citizen-led Monitoring System provides a platform where CSOs serve ascatalysts for constructive engagement between citizens and the government in conflict-affected and conflict-vulnerable areas through the conduct of participatory monitoring andevaluation processes.

3. Project and community billboards are put-up to provide the beneficiary communities withproject information.

4. Web posting of project status updates to provide regular updates on PAMANA where projectstatus reports from implementing agencies are posted online. The GAA 2015 provides thatproject status reports are to be posted by the web administrator online. In compliance withthe GAA provision on the posting of PAMANA status, OPAPP maintains the PAMANAwebsite (www.pamana.net) which features progress of implementation of projects, news and


27/28



features on PAMANA interventions, implementation guidelines and contact information ofPAMANA partner agencies. To comply with GAA provisions, CHED, ARMM and DILG haveset up their respective PAMANA websites. Additionally, the following implementingagencies – DAR, NEA, PhilHealth and DOE – have linked their websites to the PAMANAwebsite.

5. Performance-based fund releases where program implementation complies with regulargovernment accounting rules and regulations. PAMANA implementing guidelines of partneragencies includes performance-based fund releases anchored on the prepared work andfinancial plan.

Discussion with the DSWD, DILG, DA and ARMM for the pilot testing and roll-out of the PAMANAInformation System , a web-based monitoring and reporting platform that enables online submissionof PAMANA project status updates and reports by implementing partners, has also commenced.

PAMANA FY 2016 Updates

The proposed PAMANA Budget for FY2016 was approved as of end December 2015 pursuant toRepublic Act No. 10717 (General Appropriations Act of FY 2016) amounting to PhP12.842 billion.PAMANA FY 2016 interventions will be implemented by the CHED, DA, DENR, DILG, DPWH,DSWD, PHIC, and ARMM. Preparations for the implementation of target interventions areunderway. Table 13 shows a summary of the FY 2016 PAMANA budget and target interventions.

Table 13. FY 2016 PAMANA Budget and Target Interventions

AGENCYGAA 2016(RA 10717)

In PhP

INTERVENTIONS

DPWH 6,338,680,000Pillar 3: Bridge, Farm-to-Market Road, Local Road, Local

Road with Bridge

ARMM 3,543,291,000

Pillar 2: Community-Driven DevelopmentPillar 3: Support for the Humanitarian and Development

Assistance Program (Livelihood, Community Infrastructure,Access, Social Cohesion Interventions), Road, IT

Infrastructure

DILG 1,793,162,000Pillar 3: Bridge, Community Infrastructure, Local Road,

Local Road with Bridge, Post-Harvest Facility, SocialMobilization, Water System, IT Infrastructure

DA 586,756,000

Pillar 2: Community-Driven DevelopmentPillar 3: Agricultural Infrastructure, Agricultural

Production, Community Infrastructure, Farm Equipment,Livelihood and Post-Harvest Facility, Fisheries production

support

DSWD 427,472,000Pillar 2: Community-Driven Development through

KALAHI-CIDSS and Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP)


28/28


AGENCYGAA 2016(RA 10717)

In PhPINTERVENTIONS

Support to RPM-P/RPA/ABB-TPG Peace Table: CommunityPeace Dividends (CPD), Core Shelter, Livelihood, Social

Protection, Day Care Center

DENR 84,176,000Pillar 2: Livelihood through Community Reforestation

Projects;Forest Guards

PhilHealth 53,565,000 Pillar 1: Social Protection (Health Insurance Program)CHED 14,500,000 Pillar 1: Social Protection (Study Grant Program)

TOTAL 12,841,602,000

Pamana Accomplishment Report 2015

Documents

Transcript of Pamana Accomplishment Report 2015