Palm Beach County Teacher Observation & Evaluation … June 06, 2012 Worksho… · Marzano Teacher...
32
Palm Beach County Teacher Observation & Evaluation System T.O.E.S. Monday, June 4, 12
Transcript of Palm Beach County Teacher Observation & Evaluation … June 06, 2012 Worksho… · Marzano Teacher...
Palm Beach County Teacher Observation & Evaluation System
T.O.E.S.Monday, June 4, 12
Why did we change?• Mandated by the State - SB 736
- Student Success Act• New Evaluation must have four
Performance levels: Highly Effective, Effective, Needs Improvement (Developing), and Unsatisfactory
• New Evaluation’s central focus is based on improving professional practice and increasing student achievement.
• New Evaluation provides quality instructional feedback.
Monday, June 4, 12
FLDOESchool
District of PBC
ProfessionalGrowth
JTEC
Administrators
District
CTAReps
PBCTeacher
Observation& Evaluation
System
Safe SchoolsCurriculum
Who is involved?Teachers
Monday, June 4, 12
What did we do?
Spring 11
Summer 11
Fall 11
Winter 11
SB 736Passes
JTEC Formed;Marzano Approved
EvaluatorTraining's for
AP & PrincipalsDomain 1 & iObservation
(focus of SY 11-12)
Cont’d EvaluatorTraining's for
AP & Principals
Cont’d Training's;Vodcasts Presentations for Instructional Emp.
5 Focus Groups;Prof. Learning
Advisory Committee
Train the TrainerImplementation
Midyear Evaluations for Cat. I Teachers;
Survey 3;Cont’d District Staff
Training
Spring 12
Final Teacher Eval;School Leadership
Eval;Survey 5
Prep. for VAM andDomains 2, 3 & 4
District Staff TrainingiObservation Introduced
Trained 1 Teacher Liaison from each School
Monday, June 4, 12
• SB 736 - Student Success Act
• School Board approved Marzano Teacher Observation and Evaluation System
• Joint Teacher Evaluation Committee was formed and began meeting regularly.
Spring 2011
Monday, June 4, 12
Marzano Observation & Evaluation System
Student Achievement
Domain 1: Classroom Strategies & Alignment
(41 Elements SY12)
Domain 2: Planning & Preparing (8 Elements SY13)
Domain 3: Reflecting on Teaching (5 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Monday, June 4, 12
Marzano Observation & Evaluation System
Student Achievement
Domain 1: Classroom Strategies & Alignment
(41 Elements SY12)
Domain 2: Planning & Preparing (8 Elements SY13)
Domain 3: Reflecting on Teaching (5 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Monday, June 4, 12
Summer 2011
• Implemented Professional Development and Training Programs for:
• School Based Administrators•District Staff• School Liaisons
•Learning Sciences International (LSI) - provided two early training sessions for District Administrators, Principals and APs
Monday, June 4, 12
Summer 2011•Principals and APs trained (June - Present) - Domain 1 and iObservation
•JTEC adopts and begins alignment of contract language
‣Category I Teacher - hired after 1/10/10 - (including probationary teachers) ‣Category II - anyone hired prior to 1/10/10 - (held harmless until January 1/1/12)
Monday, June 4, 12
Fall 2011•Developed first year observation schedule•Ongoing Professional Development for Teachers
•Vodcast/PowerPoint overview – Principals deliver to teachers•Year-long in depth training through Train the Trainer model, LTMs, and PDD days•District-opened component (30 inservice points)•Collegial Study Groups and Professional Learning Communities within district and schools•iObservation trainings for schools, administrators and areas
Lesson Segments
Involving Routine EventsDesign Question 1: What will I do to
establish and communicate learning
goals, track student progress, and
celebrate success?• Providing Clear Learning Goals and Scales to
Measure those Goals• Tracking Student Progress
• Celebrating Student SuccessDesign Question 6: What will I do to
establish or maintain classroom rules
and procedures?• Establishing Classroom Routines
• Organizing Physical Layout of the Classroom for
Learning
Lesson Segments Addressing ContentDesign Question 2: What will I do to
help students effectively interact with
the new knowledge?• Identifying Critical Information
• Organizing Students to Interact with New
Knowledge• Previewing New Content
• Chunking Content into "Digestible Bites"
• Processing of New Information
• Elaborating on New Information
• Recording and Representing Knowledge
• Reflecting on LearningDesign Question 3: What will I do to
help students practice and deepen their
understanding of new knowledge?
• Reviewing Content• Organizing Students to Practice and Deepen
Knowledge• Using Homework• Examining Similarities and Differences
• Examining Errors in Reasoning
• Practicing Skills, Strategies, and Processes
• Revising KnowledgeDesign Question 4: What will I do to
help students generate and test
hypotheses about new knowledge?
• Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex
Tasks• Engaging Students in Cognitively Complex
Tasks Involving Hypothesis Generating and
Testing• Providing Resources and Guidance
Lesson Segments Enacted on the SpotDesign Question 5: What will I do to
engage students?• Noticing and Reacting when Students are Not
Engaged• Using Academic Games
• Managing Response Rates
• Using Physical Movement
• Maintaining a Lively Pace
• Demonstrating Intensity and Enthusiasm
• Using Friendly Controversy
• Providing Opportunities for Students to Talk
about Themselves• Presenting Unusual or Intriguing Information
Design Question 7: What will I do to
recognize and acknowledge adherence
and lack of adherence to classroom
rules and procedures?
• Demonstrating "Withitness"
• Applying Consequences
• Acknowledging Adherence to Rules and
ProceduresDesign Question 8: What will I do to
establish and maintain effective
relationships with students?
• Understanding Students' Interests and
Backgrounds• Using Behaviors that Indicate Affection for
Students• Displaying Objectivity and ControlDesign Question 9: What will I do to
communicate high expectations for all
students?• Demonstrating Value and Respect for Low
Expectancy Students• Asking Questions of Low Expectancy Students
• Probing Incorrect Answers with Low Expectancy
Students
The Marzano Observation and Feedback Protocol identifies the 41 key strategies revealed by research for effective teaching presented in a robust, easy-to-understand model
of instruction based on the Art and Science of Teaching. All 41 Key Strategies are organized into 9 Design Questions, which are further organized into 3 Lesson Segments.
Patent Pending. iObservation is a registered trademark of Learning Sciences International. © 2007-2010
Monday, June 4, 12
Professional Development
Design Question, Lesson Segments & iObservationDesign Question, Lesson Segments & iObservation
Date Design QuestionSeptember 15 DQ 1 Part 1 Element 1September 22 iObservationSeptember 28 iObservation
serSeptember 30 DQ 1 Part 2 Element 2&3
October 6 iObservationOctober 10 DQ 6 & 7October 17 DQ 2October 31 DQ 4
November 14 DQ 5 - ElementaryNovember 14 DQ 5 - SecondaryNovember 28 DQ 3December 12 DQ 8December 12 DQ 9
Professional Development Website
Fall 2011
Monday, June 4, 12
•Marzano Teacher Liaisons •Each area and/or school site•TrainU sites developed to assist departments
•Focus Groups formed for productive feedback•Professional Learning Advisory Committee formed •Principal checklist & timeline•Teacher and Administrator Monthly Updates•School Visits when requested
Fall 2011
Monday, June 4, 12
Winter 2011•Midyear Evaluations completed for Category 1 Teachers
•iObservation used as evaluation tool
•3 Walkthrough Observations
•1 Informal Observation
•1 Formal Observation
•Approximately 1200 Electronic Midyear Evaluations completed and submitted to the State for Survey 3
Monday, June 4, 12
Observations
Announced Unannounced
Formal
• Class Period• Pre/Post-Conference• Results used for annual
evaluation• Written feedback provided to the
teacher
Informal
• At least 10 minutes long• Teacher is informed of the
observation• Results used for annual
evaluation• May include written feedback
• At least 10 minutes long• Results may be used for
evaluation• Written feedback is provided to
teacher
Walkthrough• Usually 3-10 minutes• Results may be used for
evaluation
# of observations varies by job code
Monday, June 4, 12
Domain 1Formal
ObservationsInformal
Observations Walkthroughs
Category I(up to 2 yrs/
new teachers)
Category II(3 or more yrs of
service)
Non-ClassroomTeachers
StrugglingTeachers
Observations
Monday, June 4, 12
Domain 1: Classroom Strategies & Alignment
Lesson SegmentsInvolving Routine
Events
Lesson SegmentsAddressing Content
Lesson SegmentsEnacted on the Spot
DQ1: Communicating Learning Goals and Feedback
DQ6: Establishing Rules and Procedures
DQ2: Helping Students Interact with New Knowledge
DQ3: Helping Students Practice and Deepen New Knowledge
DQ4: Helping Students generate and test hypotheses
DQ5: Engaging Students
DQ7: Recognizing Adherence to Rules and Procedures
DQ8: Establishing and Maintaining Effective Relationships with Students
DQ9: Communicating High Expectations for All Students
(Refer to the DQ mat)
Monday, June 4, 12
Spring 2012•Final Electronic Teacher Evaluations for all Teachers
•Based on Teachers’ Instructional Practice - Marzano Domain 1 - (60%) and their Student Learning Growth VAM - (40%)
•Leadership Evaluation for SY 2011-2012
•Assistant Principal & Principal Evaluation
•Preparation for Implementation of Domains 2, 3 & 4
•Professional Development beginning Summer 2012
•Vodcast explaining Final Teacher Evaluation and the Value Added Model (VAM)
Monday, June 4, 12
Monday, June 4, 12
Data Feedbackas of 5.30.12
•75,256 observations completed•10,360 completed evaluations in Liquid office
Element Ratings Total #
Innovating 45,763
Applying 251,981
Developing 22,845
Beginning 5,033
Not Using 2,744
Not Applicable 6,663
ALL 335,029
Monday, June 4, 12
Challenges•User errors in iObservation that need system corrections must be manually done.
•Instructional Practice Score working towards Inter-rater Reliability
•Administrators who change locations need to finish their school site evaluations.
•Job codes vs actual assignments which influence VAM scores.
•LSI – Mongo database – data transfer and reporting is difficult.
•Learning Sciences International (LSI) developing components for Palm Beach County needs.
Monday, June 4, 12
•Administrative evaluations (LPAS) added to the system (collaborating with Martin County)
•Building capacity within PeopleSoft - Instructional Practice scores will be input from LSI to PeopleSoft
•VAM Score will be input from FL DOE
•Research & Evaluation provides a look-up table to determine the correct VAM Score
Where are we going?
Monday, June 4, 12
Marzano Observation & Evaluation System
Student Achievement
Domain 1: Classroom Strategies & Alignment
(41 Elements SY12)
Domain 2: Planning & Preparing (8 Elements SY13)
Domain 3: Reflecting on Teaching (5 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality
and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Domain 4: Collegiality
and Professionalism
(6 Elements SY13)
Monday, June 4, 12
•SY 12-13 Implementation of Domains 2, 3 and 4 with continued Training
•May 8th - Principal Training
•August 6-7th - Assistant Principal Training
•August 9th-10th - New Teacher Training
•Pre-School - School Teacher Liaison Training
•Late August - District Personnel Training
Where are we going?
Monday, June 4, 12
Where are we going?•Collaborating with other counties to streamline the evaluation process and become more cost-efficient
•Included in FADSS grant working with St. Lucie County
•SY 14-15 Awarding Merit Pay to teachers rated Highly Effective or Effective
•Customize Non-School Based and Non-Classroom Evaluations (guidance counselors, media specialists, ELL and ESE Contacts, etc)
•Inter-rater reliability and Tech Training (iPad, Computers etc)
•PBC Teacher Observation & Evaluation System Handbook in collaboration with JTEC
Monday, June 4, 12
How do we compare?
County System Race-to-the-Top
Dade District-Developed
Broward Marzano
Hillsborough Danielson
Palm Beach Marzano
Orange Marzano
Duval District-Developed
Pinellas Marzano/Danielson/Instuctional Review
7 Largest School Districts in Florida
Monday, June 4, 12
How do we compare?
• 31 School Districts / Lab School - using Marzano
• 15 Districts have a mix of Marzano and District-Developed
• 14 Districts use Danielson
• 6 remaining Districts use District-Developed Systems
Across the State
Monday, June 4, 12
Where to turn?The
Professional Development
Website•Forms•Presentations•iObservation•Research & Resources•Overview and Explanations
Monday, June 4, 12
www.FloridaSchoolLeaders.org
Monday, June 4, 12
Where to turn?
Monday, June 4, 12
Monday, June 4, 12
JTEC MembersName Title
Crandall, Mary Ann CTA
Enos, Michelle CTA
Gautney, Geri Professional Development
Gundlach, Kathi CTA
Harrell, Tracy CTA
Helfrich, Lisa Professional Development
Hench, Sharon Principal
Ludy, Van Labor RelaDons
MatulaiDs, Joe CTA
Megiel-‐Rollo, Denise CTA
Mondy, Butch Principal
Oddi, Randal CTA
Name Title
Orloff, Kathy Principal
Pegg, Jim Principal
Phillips, ChrisDna CTA
Rizzo, William CTA
Samore, David Principal
Weigel, Kathleen Asst. Sup. Prof Growth
Wilhelm, Debra CTA
Baron, Marc Performance Accountability
Howard, Mark Director, Research&EvaluaDon
McKessy, Ann Secretary, Prof Growth
Padro-‐Morel, Theresa Employee RelaDons
Weidenhamer, Gary EducaDon Technology
CTAMembers
District Members Consultants
Monday, June 4, 12
Questions?• I-Observation - Diane Wyatt• Electronic Evaluation and PeopleSoft - Gary Weidenhamer• Professional Development - Lisa Helfrich & Julie Williams• Questions - JTEC Committee• VAM Scores - Mark Howard & Marc Baron• Teacher Handbook - JTEC Committee
Dr. Kathleen WeigelAssistant Superintendent of Professional Growth
561-434-8008
Monday, June 4, 12
