Pakistan-The Way Forward

7/29/2019 Pakistan-The Way Forward

1/40

1

THE WAY

FORWARD

N.HASAN


2/40

2


3/40

3

Introduction

Why was Pakistan

Created? Let the liberals,

secularists, and pseudo-

intellectuals revisit thehistory they question and

want us to forget! The

following extracts fromthe speeches of the two

great founding fathers

leave no room for

ambiguity or distortion.


4/40

4

BETRAYALThe tolerance and goodwill that great Emperor Akbarshowed to all the non-Muslims is not of recent origin. 1t

dates back thirteen centuries ago when our Prophet not only

by words but by deeds treated the Jews and Christians, after

he had conquered them, with the utmost tolerance andregard and respect for their faith and beliefs. The whole

history of Muslims, wherever they ruled, is replete withthose humane and great principles which should be

followed and practised.

Speech on the Inauguration of the Pakistan ConstituentAssembly on 14th August 1947

All I require of you now is that everyone of us to whom

this message reaches must vow to himself and be prepared

to sacrifice his all, if necessary, In building up Pakistan as abulwark of Islam and as one of the greatest nations whoseideal is peace within and peace without. Your immediate

task Is the rehabilitation of millions of our distressed and

unfortunate brethren who are either already with us or who

have still to join us in Pakistan, bereft of all they possessedor had in this world. The least we now can do for them is to

receive them as our own brethren. No decent or sane personshould consider that they are unwelcome burden thrust on

us. Save all you can and give towards the relief of thesevictims of bestiality and vandalism who have suffered all

this for the sole reason that they are muslims.


5/40

5

Along with this, keep up your morale. Do not be afraid of

death. Our religion teaches us to be always prepared for

death. We should face it bravely to save the honour of

Pakistan and Islam. There is no better salvation for aMuslim than the death of a martyr for a righteous cause.

I would also impress upon every member of this State,particularly our youth, to show the right spirit of devotion,

courage and fortitude to give a lead to the others and to set

a nobler and higher example for those who may follow us

and the coming generations.

Remember that the scrupulous maintenance andenforcement of law and order are the prerequisites of all

progress. The tenets of Islam enjoin on every Mussalman togive protection to his neighbours and to the minorities

regardless of caste and creed. Despite the treatment whichis being meted out to the Muslim minorities in India, we

must make It a matter of our prestige and honour to

safeguard the lives of the minority communities and to

create a sense of security among them. I would like toimpress upon every Mussalman, who has at heart the

welfare and the prosperity of Pakistan, to avoid retaliation

and to exercise restraint, because retaliation and violationof law and order will ultimately result in weakening thevery foundations of the edifice you have cherished all these

years to erect. Do your duty and have faith in God. There is

no power on earth that can undo Pakistan. It has come to

stay. Our deeds are proving to the world that we are in the

right and I can assure you that the sympathies of the world,particularly of the Islamic countries, are with you. We inturn are grateful to every nation who has stretched out to us

its hand of help and friendliness.

Speech at a Mammoth Rally at the University Stadium,

Lahore on 30th October, 1947


6/40

6

The Government and the people of Pakistan entertainnothing but feelings of warmest friendship towards theMuslim Kingdom of Afghanistan which is our closest

neighbour and with whom for many centuries and for manygenerations the people of Pakistan have had countless

religious, cultural and social ties. It is doubtless known to

Your Excellency that the people of Pakistan have always

admired the spirit of independence of the Afghan nationand its great strength of character.

I desire that the relationship between these two sister

Nations may be of the greatest and the most lastingfriendship,

Reply to the Speech made by Sardar Najibullah Khan,

Special Representative of H. M. King of Afghanistan in

Pakistan at the time of presenting Credentials to the Quaid-

i-Azam on 3rd December, 1944

The great majority of us are Muslims. We follow theteachings of the Prophet Mohammad (may peace be onhim). We are members of the brotherhood of Islam in

which all are equal in right, dignity and self-respect.

Consequently, we have a special and a very deep sense of

unity. But make no mistake: Pakistan is not a theocracy oranything like it. Islam demands from us the tolerance of

other creeds and we welcome in closest association withties those who, of whatever creed, are themselves willing

and ready to play their part as true and loyal citizens ofPakistan.


7/40

7

In this short talk, I hope that I have given you some

impression of Pakistan, of our people, and what Pakistan

means to all of us. It has been suggested to me that in

conclusion I should send a greeting to the people ofAustralia. I do so gladly; and I can think of no bettergreeting than one which is traditional amongst us: "

Assalam-o-Alalkum" which is, "may peace be on you".Pakistan Zindabad.

Broadcast talk to the people of Australia recorded on 19th

February, 1948.

Nature's inexorable law is 'the survival of the fittest' and wehave to prove ourselves fit for our newly-won freedom,

You have fought many a battle on the far-flung battle fieldsof the globe to rid the world of the Fascist menace and

make it safe for democracy. Now you have to stand guard

over the development and maintenance of Islamic

democracy, Islamic social Justice and the equality ofmanhood in your own native soil. You will have to be alert,

very alert, for the time for relaxation is not yet there. With

faith, discipline and selfless devotion to duty, there isnothing worthwhile that you cannot achieve.

Address to Officers and men of the 5th Heavy Ack Ack and

6th Light Ack Ack Regiments In Malir on 21st February,

1948

The constitution of Pakistan has yet to be framed by thePakistan Cons-tituent Assembly. I do not know what the

ultimate shape of this constitution is going to be, but I am

sure that it will be of a democratic type, embodying the


8/40

8

essential principles of Islam. Today, they are as applicable

in actual life as they were 1,300 years ago. Islam and its

idealism have taught us democracy. It has taught equality

of man, justice and fairplay to everybody. We are theinheritors of these glorious traditions and are fully alive toour responsibilities and obligations as framers of the future

constitution of Pakistan.

Broadcast talk to the people of United States of America on

Pakistan recorded in February 1948.

About language, as I have already said, this Is in order to

create dis-ruption amongst the Mussalmans. Your PrimeMinister has rightly pointed this out in a recent statement

and I am glad that his Government have decided to putdown firmly any attempt to disturb the peace of this

province by political saboteurs or their agents. Whether

Bengali shall be the official language of this province is a

matter for the elected representatives of the people of thisprovince to decide. I have no doubt that this question shall

be decided solely in accordance with the wishes of the

inhabitants of this province at the appropriate time.

Let me tell you in the clearest language that there is no

truth that your normal life is going to be touched or

disturbed so far as your Bengali language is concerned. But

ultimately it is for you, the people of this province, todecide what shall be the language of your province. But let

me make it very clear to you that the State Language ofPakistan is going to be Urdu and no other language. Any

one who tries to mislead you is really the enemy ofPakistan. Without one State Language, no Nation can

remain tied up solidly together and function. Look at the


9/40

9

history of other countries. Therefore, so far as the State

Language is concerned, Pakistan's language shall be Urdu.

I tell you once again, do not fail into the trap of those who

are the enemies of Pakistan. Unfortunately, you have fifth-columnists-and I am sorry to say they are Muslims-who arefinanced by outsiders. But they are making a great mistake.

We are not going to tolerate sabotage any more.

Speech at the public meeting attended by over three lakhs

of people at Decca on March 21, 1948.

Let me restate my views on the question of a Statelanguage for Pakistan. For official use in this province, the

people of the province can choose any language they wish.This question will be decided solely in accordance with the

wishes of the people of this province alone, as freelyexpressed through their accredited representatives at the

appropriate time and after full and dispassionate

consideration. There can, however, be only one lingua

franca, that is, the language for inter-communicationbetween the various provinces of the State, and that

language should be Urdu and cannot be any other. The

State language, therefore, must obviously be Urdu, alanguage that has been nurtured by a hundred millionMuslims of this sub continent, a language understood

throughout the length and breadth of Pakistan and above

all, a language which, more than any other provincial

language, embodies the best that is In Islamic culture andMuslim tradition and is nearest to the language used in

other Islamic countries, it is not without significance thatUrdu has been driven out of the Indian Union and that even

the official use of the Urdu script has been disallowed.

There can be only one State language, if the component

parts of this State are to march forward in unison, and that


10/40

10

language, in my opinion, can only be Urdu. I have spoken

at some length on this subject so as to warn you of the kind

of tactics adopted by the enemies of Pakistan and certain

opportunist politicians to try to disrupt this State or todiscredit the Government.

Speech at the Dacca University Convocation on the 24th

March. 1948.

The first thing that I want to tell you is this, that you should

not be influenced by any political pressure, by any politicalparty or individual politician. If you want to raise the

prestige and greatness of Pakistan, you must not fall avictim to any pressure, but do your duty as servants to the

people and the State, fearlessly and honestly. Service is theback bone of the State. Governments are formed,

Governments are defeated, Prime Ministers come and go,Ministers come and go, but you stay on, and, therefore,

there is a very great responsibility placed on your

shoulders. You should have no hand in supporting this

political party or that political party, this political leader orthat political leader-this is not your business. Whichever

Government is formed according to the constitution, and

whoever happens to be the Prime Minister or Minister com-ing into power in the ordinary constitutional course, yourduty is not only to serve that Government loyally and

faithfully, but, at the same time, fearlessly, maintaining

your high reputation, your prestige, your honour and the

integrity of your service. If you will start with thatdetermination, you will make a great contribution to the

building up of the Pakistan of our conception and ourdream-a glorious State and one of the greatest nations in the

world.

In formal talk to Civil Officers at Government House,

Peshawar, on 14th April, 1948


11/40

11

I want you to remember and if you have time enough you

should study the Government of India Act, as adapted for

use in Pakistan, which is our present Constitution, that theexecutive authority flows from the Head of the Governmentof Pakistan, who is the Governor-General and, therefore,

any command or orders that may come to you cannot comewithout the sanction of the Executive Head. This is the

legal position.

Address to the Officers of the Staff College, Quetta,On 14th June, 1948

Addressing the U.S. Senate Prime Minister Liaquat All

Khan said:

"We have pledged ourselves a Federation with autonomous

units.

We have pledged that the Muslims in our State shall be

enabled to order their lives in accordance with their faith.

We have pledged that the State shall exercise its powersand authority through the chosen representatives of the

people. In this we have kept steadily before us the

principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and

social justice as enunciated by Islam.

These are articles of faith with us and by them we areirrevocably bound. They are our way of life; and no threat

or persuasion, no material peril or ideological allurementcan deflect us from the path we have chosen. In

proclaiming the objectives of our constitution, we have

called on Almighty God, to whom alone sovereignty over


12/40

12

the entire universe belongs, to bear witness to our resolve

and to guide our footsteps."

Prime Minister's address at a luncheon meeting of

the National Press Club:

"Our strongest interests, therefore, are:

"Firstly, the integrity of Pakistan.

Secondly, our culture. The majority of the eighty millionpeople of Pakistan are Muslims determined to hold their

opinions, worship God in freedom and follow the Islamicway of life. The phrase "Islamic way of life" has on many

occasions been misinterpreted by some people. It has beenmisconstrued variously as religious intolerance, theocratic

rule, return to medievalism and so on. I wish to make it

clear, therefore, that we have no theocratic State in mind.

We have in mind no special privileges of citizenship for theMuslims in our country and we abhor the Idea of applying

any religious or cultural coercion to our non-Muslim

nationals. But we firmly believe that our religion has taughtus certain principles of social and economic justice, and ofhuman values, whose application in statecraft is bound to

promote human welfare. Furthermore Islamic belief in the

right of private ownership, with Islamic laws and

institutions which tend to level down inequalities of wealth,is the best way of tackling economic disequilibrium not

only in our own country but everywhere in the world.These are not new beliefs.

The Muslims have held them for over thirteen hundred

years. We are determined in our country to apply them

afresh to the domain of human affairs.


13/40

13

Thirdly, our desire and our dire need for economic

development. These are our fundamental interests. Given

these, any student of international affairs can appreciate our

foreign relations and their trends.

Culturally, we feel a natural affiliation with other Muslim

countries and our relations with them are of the friendliest.We are keenly interested in the progress and development

of the Middle East countries and in the maintenance of their

independence.

I have only one last remark to make and I will preface it by

requesting you to turn your minds once more to what I saidearlier about the Islamic way of life which we wish to

pursue as an article of irrevocable faith In a world ofconflicting ideologies, is it not, therefore, a matter of

supreme satisfaction that at least one nation amongst suchnations should not suffer from such confusion"

Canadian Prime Minister L.S.St. Laurent welcomed

Liaquat Ali Khan warmly and enthusiastically. He also

paid generous and glowing tributes to Pakistan'sfounding fathers and said:

"At present Canadians are wont to associate particularly

the names of two men with Pakistan that of Mr Mohammed

Ali Jinnah, who is regarded as the father of his country andwhose name has been immortalized by a grateful people's

use of the title "the Great Leader" and your own, Mr.,Prime Minister. Mr. Jinnah, in creating a new nation, relied

heavily upon you, Mr. Liaquat All Khan whom hedescribed as his "right- hand man."


14/40

14

The Prime Minister of Pakistan's reply to Mr. St.

Laurent's speech:

"The historic decision that Muslims of British India hadtaken, to work for a State of their own, was eminentlyjustified. We are determined that the Muslims in our State

shall be enabled to order their lives in accordance with theirfaith.

We are pledged to the principles of democracy, freedom,

equality, tolerance and social justice as enunciated byIslam. This does not mean theocracy; for Islam does not

believe either in priesthood or in the caste system. On thecontrary our conception of democracy is possibly even

more comprehensive than that which is contained in theinstitutions of universal franchise and majority rule. For it

embraces social and economic justice, the right of privateownership, of each individual to enjoy the fruit of his

honest labour and yet with laws and institutions designed to

eliminate destitution and to place healthy checks on vast

accumulations of unearned wealth.

All this we call the Islamic way of life and pursue it

because as Muslim we could not follow any other ideologyor seek guidance from any other source but God, whoseinjunctions we believe these to be.

We are resolved to safeguard our freedom at all posts,

whatever the threat and whatever the quarter from which

aggression may face us.


15/40

15

Liaquat Ali Khan then proceeded to deliver his

"eulogy" to glorify the Quaid-e-Azam, father of the

nation.

"On this memorable occasion I am reminded of the father

of our nation and the founder of our freedom, our Greatleader, our Quaid-e-Azam, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, of

revered memory, without whose vision, determination and

burning honesty Pakistan might have remained a vague

longing and a distant dream, and the reality, of which myhumble presence in your august company today is but a

symbol, might never have been born. A sincere patriot apassionate follower of the democratic idea, and a man who

saw farther and more clearly than his fellows, he led theMuslims of British India out of their perplexities and

frustrations into the open air of freedom, and gave shape,significance and direction to their quest for liberty. All his

life he fought for freedom but since he fought for the

substance and not for the shadow, for the thing and not for

the word, he let no illusion or catch-phrases obscure hispenetrating insight or confound his grasp of the essentials.

He struggled long and hard to forge the diverse peoples of

his subcontinent into a mighty nation. But for most as hewas in the ranks of those who fought for independence, hewas also the first to perceive the inexorable logic of facts,

and when the time came, to proclaim fearlessly that the

people of British India, bound together though they were in

their common subjection, where not one, but two nations,

and that to relegate one hundred million Muslims to theposition of a perpetual political minority and to force theHindu nation and the Muslim nation into a single unwieldy

state would be the negation of democracy and would createthe greatest single unstable area in the world. The great

truth that he uttered was startling in its simplicity that for a

long time even some of his close friends and companions


16/40

16

found it stimulating, but strange. But the hundred million

suppressed Muslims knew instinctively that what he said

merely gave coherence and dynamism to their own hesitant

inarticulate feelings When on the 15 of August, 1947, ourflag was unfurled in Karachi, a nation of eighty millionpeople thanked God that the Quaid-i-Azam had lived to see

his dream come true And when he left us to rest in God, towhose greater glory he had dedicated himself, we knew that

he had bequeathed to us a great destiny to fulfil. Wherever

the flag of Pakistan may fly, its capital shall always be that

hallowed piece of earth where he lies buried"


17/40

17

Extract from Authors

book Price of IgnoranceA correct evaluation of any political system requires the

measurement of the amount of power concentrated in oneor more persons. Reflecting on this issue in a lighter vein,

one is reminded of English poet Alexander Popes beautiful

satirical verse:

For forms of government let fools contest,

Whatever is best administered is best.

At the time of writing this article I was tempted to quotefew more verses from Popes relevant poem, but on

account of the religious sensitivities I refrained from doingso. However, increasingly cognizant of the lengthening

shadows of religious extremism, I would like the readers to

seriously ponder upon his following selected verses to

remind themselves of the ill consequences of not heeding tothe call for sanity and toleration in the past.

For modes of faith let graceless zealots fight;His cant be wrong whose life is in the right.

In faith and hope the world will disagree,

But all mankinds concern is charity.

As some to church repair,

Not for the doctrine, but the music there.

Then unbelieving priests reformed the nation,

And taught more pleasant methods of salvation.

Slave to no sect, who takes no private road,


18/40

18

But looks through nature up to natures God.

Know then thyself, presume not God to scan;

The proper study of mankind is man.

Matthew Arnolds poem given at the beginning of this

book also perhaps needs supplementing to fully imbibe thedepth of his pain and sorrow on the rapidly disappearing

belief in Faith, lamenting the grievous loss thus:

The Sea of Faith

Was once, too, at the full, and round earths shore

Lay like the folds of a bright gridle furld

But now I only hear

Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,

Retreating, to the breath

Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear

And naked shingles of the world.

The present day Muslims tend to believe that in the religio-cultural context they are passing through uniquely critical

times, whereas the truth is that not long ago the Christian

world too had undergone similar convulsions. The zealots

in the past drove out the Faith from peoples lives and,instead, glorified the Form and Ritual, bereft of the true

sprit of Faith. This paved the way for secularism to getentrenched, thus banishing out the Faith from the collective

lives of the society and leaving it adrift, to be followedaccording to the whims of the individuals. Fortunately, for

the Muslims, as well as the mankind at-large, there is

some glimmer of hope if the revival and institutionalization

of Ijtihad could be seriously attempted and achieved to

weld together desperate peoples into a tolerant world-wide

community, free from the ravages of all pervadingmaterialism. (N.H.)


19/40

19

Resurrecting BhuttoVain attempt to chase shadows

The rank and file leadership of the Peoples Party jiyalas

persist in their assertion that Bhutto was judiciallymurdered and that his case should be reopened by the

Supreme Court to uphold and affirm their said belief andrefuse to accept that he was lawfully executed.

Unfortunately, the people who were never loyal to theideology of Pakistan managed to rule the country for nearly

sixty years and continue to distort its history. I had written

during his lifetime, in some detail about his downfall andthe causes thereof. In this regard I reproduce below some of

my printed observations. To this I will only add that it has

been claimed by most of our politicians that Bhutto mighthave had his weaknesses but he was not Corrupt. The

fact is that the wealth acquired unlawfully by corrupt

means helps the perpetrator to gain power to control hisaffairs by fair and foul means. Striving to get and cling to

power could, therefore, be considered the tool or means to

achieve the intended goal. Bhuttos lust for power, which

even led to the disintegration of Pakistan, could undeniably

be regarded as a strong streak of his character. Moreover, inthe context of his feudal background, the following

demeanours cannot be overlooked:

1. To acquire the possession of his fathersproperty in India worth about rupees

145,000 on the grounds that he held an

Indian passport, implying thereby that he


20/40

20

was the national of that country though

living in Pakistan. For further details on

this 'Bhutto's treachery' visit the link

given below:

http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2411/stor

ies/20070615004908200.htm

2. To obtain absolute power, he exploited

Punjabs desire for hegemony andwithout any qualm and conscience

contrived with other disloyal elements inand outside the country to break Pakistan.

3. In the crucial UN Security Councilmeeting he is shown in a TV clip to stormout, while tearing Polands reconciliatory

resolution, loudly abusing the delegates

representing the world community in Urdufor the benefit and applause of the people

of Pakistan, whom he had befooled before

and after getting into power. The words heverbally uttered and listened all over theworld should have opened the eyes and

minds of everyone. The words spoken by

this Great Leader were Sooar kay

Bachchey (bastards),

Haramzade

(sons of bitch) and Ulloo

ke pathey (stupid).

Unbridled power, wrested by corruption and Machiavellian

way of craft and deception, fascist practices like forming

Federal Security Force (FSF), and violent means has


21/40

21

been the hallmark of Bhuttos dynasty. The two sons of

Bhutto, who had earlier resorted to terrorism by high

jacking PIA plane, met violent deaths. Benazir, brought up

in his own image by Bhutto, preferred to commit suicide.Both, father and daughter clung to power and fame. Infathers case, window of opportunity available to keep alive

was closed by refusing to avail of the opportunity providedby law for grant of mercy appeal, in the vain hope that his

friends and supporters aboard will succeed to bear pressure

on Zia enough to pardon him. In daughters case even after

strong evidence of imminent hazards and warnings of threatto her life, she preferred self-immolation by sticking her

head out of the cars sunroof.

While briefly reflecting on Zia-ul-Haqs rule during

his presidency, I will fail in my duty if I ignore to

mention that he took over power after PakistanNational Alliance (PNA) movement had mountedsignificant demand for establishment of Nizam-e-

Mustafa. Zia-ul-Haq was justified in believing that he

had over whelming mandate from the people to

establish an Islamic Order in the country. The

sentiments and ideals which had found acceptancewith the Muslims in India before partition, started to

re-surface. This observation was also fully endorsed by

late Allama Muhammad Asad , who confirmed that

after returning from a long-overdue visit to Pakistan

my views about the then present situation there as well

as the personality of President Zia-ul-Haq coincidedwith his (the author). However, again the forces

which were aligned with Bhutto in promoting

secularism demonize him to this day. Fortunately, it

appears we have recently been blessed with a new

shepherd in the shape of Professor Thair-ul-Qadri who


22/40

22

promises to be the emerging leader to gather the

dispersed flock and drive it in the direction which was

originally perceived by the founders of Pakistan. The

entire nation is now looking towards him and prayingthat their dream will come true.

The writer has vivid memories of two famous publicmeetings presided over by Quaid-e-Azam in 1943 and

1946, listened to by thousands of people in completesilence even though they did not understand English. That

spirit has remained dormant until a flicker of hope emerged

on Zia-ul-Haqs attempt to Islamise Pakistan though

opposed and frustrated by the socialist and so called miss-

guided molvies promoting their outmoded sectarian

beliefs. It is now third time that the dim flame of hopeappears to have rekindled.

However, I have grave misgivings that the people who had

all along negated the ideology of Pakistan might once again

resort to their nefarious means to frustrate the latest attempt

to uphold Islamic Order in Pakistan. Let us hope and pray

Allah helps us all.

N Hasan

Islam: Medicine for

Hapless Pakistan

Mr. S.M. Ali, in his article The dangers that lurks

as Pakistan goes Islams (February 2, 1979), seems to

have failed in contributing anything original or

positive. He has merely echoed the thoughts and

apprehensions of the present day Pakistani pseudo-


23/40

23

intellectuals. The unfortunate fact is, there are hardly

any intellectuals, or liberals left in Pakistan. Liberalism

tends to degen-erate into licentiousness, if not duly

tempered with tolerance. This is precisely whatliberals in Pakistan want when they clamour for

arrogating to themselves all rights and privileges to act

and behave in any manner they deem fit, without any

regard to universally accepted social and legal

restraints. Self-interest first, is their motto.

It is a sad commentary on the affairs of the ideological

state of Pakistan that, ever since its inception in 1947,

there have practically been no intellectuals in the

country. The reasons are obvious. Just before inde-

pendence, most of the British-trained bureaucrats and

politicians jumped into the Muslim League band-wagon to secure for them-selves comfortable niches to

manoeuvre from in the new State. They hardly subs-

cribed to the ideology, but never hesitated to arouse

the passions of the Muslim masses who truly believed

in Islamic renaissance. After independence, the gover-

nment which came to power in succession tended toput curbs on the freedom of thought and speech.

When-ever they found it expedient, they never missed

any opportunity to ensnare the so called intellectuals

by purs-uation, bribe or coercion.

In a country where literacy rate is below 20 percent,many able scientists, doctors, teachers, who could

rightly be credited with a clear conscience, were either

obliged to seek opportunities in Britain, US, Canada or

Middle East countries, or forced to go into a self-

imposed silence.


24/40

24

Consequently, corrupt governments could breed only

corrupt intellectuals, left free to abandon their

primary concern for mind and spirit in their pursuit ofsome material benefit. To be regarded as intellectual, it

became fashionable to champion the socialist cause.

Though proclaimed as intellectuals, their epic-urean

yearnings were whipped-up equally by the successive

local governments as well as by a giant neighboring

socialist country. In particular, under ex-PrimeMinister Bhuttos tyrannical rule, no one dared to

speak truth. It is, there-fore, a traversity of facts to

claim that there are liberals or intellectuals in Pakistan

wielding least influence over any segment of the

society.

The self-styled intellect-uals in Pakistan have already

let down their own people. They will, after they have

performed their act, be cast away by their mentor and

great friends across the border. Greater irony awaits

others, to catch them unawares. These chameleons

show all signs of befriending the influential people inthe West, especially those connected with the mass-

media, but surreptitiously remain engaged in causing

irreparable damage to the countrys relations with

America. It is sincerely hoped that by now this great

leader of the West must have learnt a lesson from the

Iranian debacle and, in future, the sentiments andaspirations fervently shared by the masses will not be

ignored.

The events which have taken place in Iran during

recent months, culminating in virtual abdication of the


25/40

25

Shah, bear close resemblance to the events preceding

the overthrow of Bhutto in Pakistan. World press did

not take proper notice of those events, per-haps

because the balance of power was not so muchdisturbed as now in the case of Iran. However, the fact

is, people of Pakistan rose magnificently to voice their

true sentiments, for the first time during the 30-year

life of the nation. It was a popular movement to

demand enforcement of the Islamic order in Pakistan,

which swept away Bhutto and all his forces (includingthe internal wing of I.S.I, the equivalent of Iranian

Savak). As such it surprises me to find Mr. S.M. Ali

aghast and trying to regard President Zias staunch

commitment to the Islami-sation of Pakistan as

unfortunate. Equally surprising is his ignorance of

the basic stipulates behind the demand for an Islamicorder in Pakistan. According to Muslim belief, Islam is

an all embracing code of life, consequently, there is

nothing incongruous in the statement of Mufti

Mahmud (the PNA Chief), that special benches

would also scrutinize the existing fiscal laws, while a

new economic policy, to be announced in May, wouldprepare the stage for an interest-free banking system

and Islamic taxation law.

Whereas the issue of interest-free banking would

necessarily require a lengthy discussion to remove the

misgivings generally expressed by the economists, fewwords at this stage about the Islamic taxes may help to

clear the minds of your readers. It has been argued that

under Islamic system the government will not be

allowed to impose taxes other than Zakat and the

meager collection (at 2 percent) will not be enough


26/40

26

to sustain its overall spen-ding. Nothing could be

farther from truth. Zakat is basically applied to the

funds and assets which remain lying idle. Moreover,

recoveries under this tax can be used only for thepurposes of social welfare, ie, to meet the financial

needs of the poor, invalids etc. Many European

countries, formost amongst them being Britain, have

enforced necessary laws making every wage-earner

liable to pay a certain amount towards the national

social security schemes. Therefore, there is nothingnew about this kind of tax. What modern states have

been able to realize so late in the twentieth century,

after so much trials and tabulations, Islam prescribed it

nearly :1300 years ago!

(HongKong Standard 14 Feb, 1979)

Bhuttos place in history

Salamat Alis account of former Pakistan premier

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakis-tans day of judgment

[Review, Feb 16] appears objective. Few peopleoutside Pakistan realize that Bhutto was born and

trained in feudalistic traditions. He acted like a despot

while in power, and set himself on a fascist course. It

is a travesty of fact to say that he paved the way for

democratic rule.

In fact, it was General Yahya Khan who promised

and staged the first general election in the country in

1970, allowing the entire nation to conduct a

prolonged political debate for nearly a year before the

elections. In his otherwise despicable rule, Yahyas


27/40

27

only positive contribution was to provide the long-

denied opportunity to create political awakening and a

great awareness among the people and he alone

deserves the credit for that.

Bhutto frustrated every sincere effort to transfer

power to the elected majority party in those elections,

headed by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. He virtually

wrecked parliament when he publicly threatened to

break the legs of elected members from West Pakistanif they attended its first session. Again, he was the only

leader to endorse publicly the military action in East

Pakistan (Bangladesh). Thank God, Pakistan has been

saved were the actual words he used in a statement

about the military action. In order to claim the sole

right to represent West Pakistan, he treated otherleaders, many of them credited with integrity and

sound judgment, with utter contempt though his party

has polled only 39% of the votes against 61% shared

by other parties joined in a united front.

However, Bhuttos appe-tite for power was such thathe sabotaged the outcome of elections by taking overthe government from a military ruler by connivance.Once at the top, he entrenched himself by leavingBritish imperialists far behind in their policy of divideand rule. He deliberately created an environment ofconf-rontation, so that one province was set against

another, one sect against another, Shias against Sunnis,peasant against landlord, worker against industrialist,student against teacher and even a son against hisfather.

Bhutto will be executed, if his mercy appeal is

rejected, for a crime duty reported at a police station


28/40

28

while he was still in power and all efforts to delete his

name as one of the accused persons had failed. Scores

of other political assassination cases during his rule

have remained untraced and unsolved because notenough evidence was available.

Pakistanis, are wondering whether the world leaders

now advocating clemency are really in their right

senses. They are also amazed over their profe-ssions of

love for democracy and human rights, forgetting

Bhuttos attempt to strangle democracy by riggingelect-ions and letting loose a reign of terror in which

nearly 100,000 people (including thousands of women

and children) were detained and imprisoned in

hurriedly raised jails during a four- month show of

brute force.

Bhutto vacillated between Right and Left not

because he sincerely wanted to strike a balance in the

countrys interest. He used both platforms according to

his own specific needs. He exploited Islam to gain

popularity with the people, raised the Jerusalem issue

to swindle the Arabs and convened an Islamic summitconference to maneuver recognition of Bangladesh

which people had opposed.

If Bhuttos contribution is really all that non-

Pakistanis, want us to believe, how can it be explained

that Pakistan has not gone through any convulsion orclamour worth mentioning, despite the recent court

judgment, and that the victims only hope for survival

now rests upon the effectiveness of foreign leaders

persuasion and appeals for mercy? The implications

are obvious and need hardly be explained. Bhutto will


29/40

29

never be regarded as a martyr, though no history book

will ignore him either.

(Far eastern Economic Review, HongKong, 23 Feb 1979)

Pakistans Dilemma

Your correspondent Salamat Ali seems to share theview that Zulfikar Ali Bhuttos execution may spark

off large-scale demonstrations and regional reaction

detrimental to Pakistans solidarity [Buying more time

for Bhutto, Review, Mar.2]. His contention lacks

credibility because the credentials of Fazle Ilahi

Chaudhry whom he has quoted extensively, are highlydoubtful. Before being elevated to the office of

president, Chaudhry seemed to be an instrument of

Bhutto in the role of National Assembly speaker. He

displayed few qualms of conscience when giving his

rulings to throttle the oppositions voice. He shares

equally with Bhutto the responsibility for mauling andmurdering democracy in Pakistan.

Aspersions have also been cast by suggesting that

the Supreme Court was perhaps not impartial, and

judges hailing from the majority province alone

rejected Bhuttos appeal. This is indeed ironical,because this very province had all along lent its

support to him, presumably to show gratitude for

saving it from Bengali domination, which it feared had

power actually been transferred to Sheikh Mujibur

Rahman.


30/40

30

Bhutto himself sowed the seeds of division, and any

separatist movement started after his execution, as

forecast by the prophets of doom, will be directconsequence of his policies. He alienated the North

West Frontier Province and Bluchistan by detaining

their key leaders in jail during most of his rule and

ruthlessly mounting a military action against his own

countrymen in Baluchistan, which lasted until his

ousting.

If Pakistan witnesses widespread disturbance

following Bhuttos execution (if the court rejects the

review application and the sentence is duly carried

out), it will not be for any love for Bhutto but for the

simple reason that a handful of communist terroristssupported by a neighboring country nursing a

centuries old dream to reach the warm waters of the

Indian Ocean will try to exploit the situation for their

own benefit.

This is a likely outcome which Bhuttos friends inthe West should be prepared to reckon with. The

dilemma facing them is that the communists and the

Islamic revival movement equally arouse their

apprehensions. They appear to be divided in their

evaluation as to which of the two evils is the lesser

one. Much will, therefore, depend on what attitudethey ultimately adopt, because a country like Pakistan

despite its efforts to steer clear of troubled waters

must necessarily expect foreign interference in its

internal affairs.


31/40

31

(Far Eastern Economic Review, Hongkong, 16 March

1979)

The Bhutto Syndrome

Apparently carried away by his hatred for Pakistani

President Zia-ul-Haq, Mohammad Iqbal Khan hasmade several incorrect statements [Letters, Review,

June 13]. To my knowledge the British Indian Army

was never used to quell political agitation or to

massacre the people of India, Muslims or otherwise,

during their struggle for independence.

Iskander Mirza was a political agent and later, asdefense secretary in the central government, hebecame a strong pillar of the countrys bureaucracy.Mirza later seized power by conspiracy. Ayub Khanmerely paid him back in his own coin to usher in adecade which some still believe was Pakistansbrightest period yet. However, history will nevercondone his action, which got the army involved inpolitics.

As regards the 1965 conflict with India, it was the

late Pakistani prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto who

believed in confronta-tion and, as foreign minister,

assured Ayub Khan athat India would not cross theborder if Pakistan engaged it in a local conflict within

disputed Kashmir. Bhutto meddled in purely military

matters and once had to be practically thrown out of

the army operations room during the war by the chief

of staff.


32/40

32

Who brought about the 1971 debacle? Bhutto was

the only politician who stayed away from the round

table conference called by Ayub Khan to seek political

reconciliation. Sensing eclipse by other seasoned andpopular politicians, Bhutto sought and befrie-nded

army generals and conspired with the bureaucracy to

oust Ayub Khan and to install Yahya Khan in his

place.

Most views expressed about the situation in Pakistan

tend to bypass the crux of the problem. Provincialismand bureaucracy are the twin evils causing Pakistans

present ills. No Pakistani is prepared openly to admit

this for fear of victimization. Being the most populated

province, the Punjab has always dominated the

bureaucratic order and the countrys army. Smaller

provinces consider that their own rights are beingtrampled on by the dominant Punjab.

The solution to Pakistans many domestic problems

lies in cutting the bureaucracy down to size and

dividing the present Punjab province into three of four

geogra-phically and ethnically smaller units and, at the

same time, readjusting other provincial boundaries.The Punjab of British India days has already lost its

unity through division at partition in 1947. India has

divided its smaller section of the Punjab into Haryana

and Punjab. Pakistan should do the same if such a

move would ensure its own integrity and stability.

(Far Eastern Economic Review, HongKong, 25 July1980)


33/40

33

(An extract from the Authors open letter

MEMOGATE posted on 14 December

2011 on his website. Further comments

were added thereto in his ANOTHER

OPEN LETTER dated 17 December 2011

which follows).

Last but not the least is the role played by the corrupt

Journalists (dealt with in some details in my book,

Democracy: A Mirage) in league with the politicians, both

operating under the aegis of their foreign masters. The socalled elite civil society of the country too has failed in

clearly defining and upholding the interest and well beingof Pakistan. Finally, the judiciary headed by the Chief

Justice of Pakistan who had let the entire legal community

to become politicized. For example, the selective pick and

choose method adopted in hearing and deciding somecases hurriedly, as in the case of Swiss Account or NRO,

and indefinite postponement of hearing cases such as those

of Air Marshal Asghar Khan and Mian Nawaz Sharif,makes one wonder about the impartiality of the Court. The12

thMay 2007 incident in Karachi resulting in the death of

52 innocent persons should have awakened his conscience

to make him realize that the said 52 persons were sacrificed

at the alter of his ego, since he played into the hands of

self-seeking coterie of politicians and lawyers who wantedto enter the city like victorious centurions entering Rome.In the present chaotic and highly explosive conditions it is

of utmost importance that all those influential people whowield power take up the right path to avoid the disaster

which seems to be awaiting around the corner. To begin

with, the present system of electing members to the Federal


34/40

34

and Provincial Assemblies should be changed to introduce

the proportional representation, in which the election

expenses are borne by the party and not by the individual

candidates. In such event, the partys manifesto will belooked at and voted for by the voters and not the influenceand pedigree of the candidates themselves. Secondly, the

Election Commission should immediately be alerted so asnot to be intimated or influenced by any person or quarter.

The clauses 62 and 63 of the constitution should be

implemented vigorously, whereby the unscrupulous

candidates such as Imran Khan and his ilk with well knownand thoroughly documented record of conduct like his

could be debarred forever. May Allah help us all!

ANOTHER OPEN LETTER

I tend to believe that a lot more needs to be said further to

the contents of my first open letter regarding

MEMOGATE dated 14th

December 2011. For example,certain quarters have been vehement in creating hype to

portray a picture of the Judiciary much larger than its size

and present status. All existing national institutions,including the Armed Forces defending the country, areseverely criticized either for incompetence or corruption

implying thereby that the Judiciary is the last hope to

safeguard the interests and well-being of the country.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, it too is

not free from pressures and strains being exerted from alienforces within and outside the country. In view of havingachieved the stated aim of restoration of the Judiciary in the

wake of large scale processions and long marches inconcert with those forces, the Judges ought to have

voluntarily given up their seats bearing in mind collective

wishes of the people as expressed in the Charter of


35/40

35

Democracy signed by 38 political party heads in their

London meeting, when they specifically demanded that the

Judges who had taken oath under PCO will not be

acceptable. The said meeting will also be remembered foryet another precedence it had then created. It declareditself as representing democratic values, but recommended

that no party in the country should talk to or associate withMQM. No member of the civil society, Lawyers or Judges

(i.e. by taking suo moto notice) did anything to confront

and rectify such anti-democratic declaration.

In a recent television interview Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan

publicly stated that Mian Nawaz Sharif was reluctant tocarry out nuclear explosion and was goaded by others

including himself to do so. Let us also not forget that itwas during his regime that posters or newspaper articles

were published by denigrating Pakistans defendants bycalling them collectively as Rouge Army. It was also

during Benezir Bhutto and Mian Nawaz sharifs

premiership that brutal force was applied to crush MQM in

Karachi. No one including Judiciary intervened to takenotice to find out the truth. Therefore, not surprising if

MQM seeks alliance with any governing party to save lives

and properties of its members. This writer is himself amuhajir and proud to be as such because it constantlyreminds him of his affiliation with Islam, the real raison

detre for creating Pakistan. The truth is that their

policies, secular in thought and in action, does not pemit

persons like myself to agree with their policies in all

respects. This does not, however, require their forcefulisolation or exclusion from so called democratic process,nor should they be criticized for demanding repatriation of

Pakistanis living in abject conditions in Bangladesh forkeeping their faith in Pakistan. Especially so, if hundreds

of thousands Pakhtoons, Afghanis and others could be

freely admitted to settle down in Karachi. I have no


36/40

36

problem living along with Afghanis because they emigrated

from their war-torn country to take refuge in Pakistan and

we both share the same ethos as Muhajir.

The disunity amongst people and disintegration of Pakistanis the primary objective of the Indo-Israeli axis, nurtured by

Zionists, and our own so called leaders having readilyfallen in their trap, mostly because in their pursuit of

worldly gains they have forgotten that the allegiance to

Pakistan without first reiterating their commitment to the

spirit of Islam will be doomed to failure in the presentgloom and doom scenario. The only institution which

infuses hope is our defence forces, whose morale is beingseverely tested and mauled by the said axis. In this respect

my attached article on the role of our Armed Forces isworth inviting your attention and serious consideration.

Recalling here the great trauma which the entire nation had

undergone four decades ago when we lost East Pakistan

due to mechanizations of the West Pakistani politicians

who, subsequently took shield behind Yahya Khansweaknesses and falsely trumpeted failures of the armed

forces to save their own skins and gain power. The writer is

also reminded of the role then played by Innocentintermediaries, such as Haroon family, the usurpers ofQuaid-e-Azams gift to the people of Pakistan. They now

sit comfortably in America hobnobbing with important

persons close to that countrys Administration.

It may perhaps help the readers to obtain a broaderperspective and better understanding of the hectic politicalactivities during those times specifically spot-lighted here,

if they could find time for reading the writers books,Reconstruction of Pakistan (Pakistan-ki-Tameer-e-nau)

and In search of a Saviour (Quom-ka-Maseeha-konn).


37/40

37

Reform of Electoral rules and the mode of governance

ATHREE STEP SOLUTION

Gist of the letter sent to the Chief Election Commissioner

Justice Fakhruddin G Ibrahim

Your Honour

Asaslam alikum

The implementation of the proposal will require certain prior action

which, in my view, could briefly be as under:

1. An appropriate Act may be passed by the present Parliamentand thereafter dissolved (by signing on its own death warrant!)

2. An interim government be installed by the chief Justice jointly

with the Election Commissioner, comprising of non-politicalpersons of civil society, retired judges, retired un-blemished

generals and competent bureaucrats. This government

sufficiently buffed-up and enlarged, if necessary, could also

act as our constitution making body to give shape to thesuggested governmental, electoral and territorial proposal and

then draft afresh a new concise and reformed constitution and

thereafter, completing the whole exercise until newly Elected

Parliament under the new Constitution and a fresh mandate isinstalled in a period no more than 18months. Special attention

should be directed while preparing the new constitution on

two specific matters i.e. the election to be held on party basis,

providing their lists of candidates, and bearing the election

expenses only from party funds. Secondly, the elections

should be held on Proportional Representation basis.

3. Senior most Vice-chancellor from amongst all Pakistaniuniversities Vice-chancellors may be installed as President

prior to the formation of the interim government.

Nuzair Hasan


38/40

38

Quaids Vision

This is a summary of the letter sent toDr. Muhammad Farooq Sattar Deputy Convener of MQM

Referring to the recent confrontational debate initiated bythe MQM Rabita Committee members, especially Mr

Haider Abbas Rizvi, to choose either Quaids Pakistan or

that of the Talibans, I take strong exception to some

distortion arising from this untimely debate. For yourconsideration my article BETRAYAL and much more

can be read or downloaded from website.

I also seize this opportunity to reproduce below someextracts from my recent letter emailed to Mr. Altaf Hussain

which needs to be given serious thought.

Let me please recall here that the persons like myself still

proudly wear the badge of their Muhajir heritage going

back to the days of the advent of Islam. Had some of us not

forgotten our commitment to rejuvenate the spirit of Islam

based on Ijtihad, the Afghan Taliban or their Pakistani

namesake would have not resorted to propagate their crudebrand of Islam. Infact, Taliban phenomena would not have

taken roots in the first instance had Pakistan stood

steadfastly by the objective it was created for. Perhaps, now

we must await suspense-fully their invasion like their

predecessors during the centuries gone by..I wonder if

this is the price to be paid when out-growing too quickly in

pursuit of recognition as a main-stream (secular) party,though still shunned by all others.

Nuzair Hasan

www.nakhudapublications.com


39/40

39

PAKISTANS DILEMMA

No wonder, having lost and forgotten the founding

fathers vision for Pakistan, the nation still appears

to be struggling to find its true role. The bookspresented by Nakhuda Publications can however

be viewed as a serious attempt to resolve the

identity crisis facing it. Read or listen in the

comfort of your home or while on a long drive. An

opportunity not to be missed to get to know why

Pakistan was created? What socio-politicalchallenges confront it? Lest we all go astray, why

not join us in our quest for the Right Path.

Order without delay any audio-book and get an

attractive Khutba'e Hajjatul Wida poster FREE.

Truly an all-time great CHARTER of universal

harmony and well-being. Just follow it to create an

enduring SOCIAL CONTRACT that ensures

Falah fid-Dunya wa fil-Akhirah!

www.nakhudapublications.com


40/40

40

Pakistan-The Way Forward

Documents

Transcript of Pakistan-The Way Forward