PAIN

42
PAIN

description

PAIN . Perception. What hurts more?. PERCEPTION . Two senarios. Perception of pain . “what determines the volume level of symptoms, how is it that some people amplify their symptoms, and others de amplify them?” Do some individuals “amplify” their symptoms? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of PAIN

Page 1: PAIN

PAIN

Page 2: PAIN
Page 3: PAIN

Perception

Page 4: PAIN

What hurts more?

Page 5: PAIN

PERCEPTION

Two senarios

Page 6: PAIN

Perception of pain

Page 7: PAIN
Page 8: PAIN

“what determines the volume level of symptoms, how is it that some people amplify their symptoms, and others de amplify them?”

Do some individuals “amplify” their symptoms?

Does amplification reflect the fact that patients have different explanatory models for understanding the significance of their pain?

Page 9: PAIN

What do we think causes pain? Tissue damage Posture & muscle imbalances

Page 11: PAIN

Nociception

Nociception is the process by which intense thermal, mechanical or chemical stimuli are detected by a subpopulation of peripheral nerve fibers, called nociceptors

Their high threshold differentiates nociceptors from sensory neurons

Page 13: PAIN
Page 14: PAIN
Page 15: PAIN

Noxious stimuli

An external or internal physical change that induces afferent input in the nervous system, with or without sensory experience or a behavioral response. A noxious stimulus is actually, or potentially, damaging to tissue and liable to cause pain, but does not invariably do so

Page 16: PAIN

Nociception is simply a sensory signal indicating potential harm. Pain is a conscious experience, and whether nociception ends up being perceived as pain depends on many more factors.

Page 17: PAIN

Pain without nociception is entirely possible

Page 18: PAIN
Page 19: PAIN

Phantom limb pain

Page 20: PAIN

Because phantom limb pain feels so real, it is reasonable to conclude that the body we normally feel is subserved by the same neural processes in the brain; these processes are normally activated and modulated by inputs from the body, but they can act in the absence of any inputs

Page 21: PAIN

Neuromatrix

Page 22: PAIN

What we think causes it

Page 23: PAIN

Postural Structural Biomechanical Model

Misalignments can “impose excessive stress on the spine leading to degeneration/damage or dysfunction and eventually to painful back conditions

In this model, the imbalances and symmetries increase the abnormal mechanical/physical stresses imposed on the musculoskeletal system. This may lead recurrent injury or the development chronic conditions through a gradual process of wear-and-tear

Page 24: PAIN

Does poor posture really equal pain?

Page 25: PAIN

“does it really matter if these PSB factors or minor control changes exist and would they cause some catastrophic failure in the musculoskeletal system?”

Page 26: PAIN

“the spine can undergo profound physical changes that are well tolerated without the development of a symptomatic condition.”

Page 27: PAIN

Biological Reserves and Tolerance

Page 28: PAIN

Biological reserve allows for such losses without a negative effect on spinal function or the development of a condition.

The system is capable of tolerating and compensating for these factors within the available surplus.

Page 29: PAIN

Trunk stabilization is achieved by what level of contraction?

Add 32 kg weight to the torso- now what?

Page 30: PAIN

Muscle Imbalances?

“whether insufficient or excessive, a deviation from optimal extensibility is thought to precipitate unusual wear and tear on capusular structures and articular surfaces of involved joints. It is suggested that deviations from optimal extensibility contribute to muscle imbalances, faulty posture, and dysfunctional movement. Although guidelines for what constitutes insufficient, optimal, and excessive extensibility measurements are based on the science of kinematics, their clinical validity has rarely been studied.

Page 31: PAIN

Chronic Pain

Page 32: PAIN

alterations of the pain pathway lead to hypersensitivity, such that pain outlives its usefulness as an acute warning system and instead becomes chronic and debilitating

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2852643/

Page 33: PAIN

GOOD

Page 34: PAIN

ANNOYING

Page 35: PAIN

Nociceptive pain is an adaptive alarm system, persistent pain is maladaptive

Essentially an ongoing false alarm

Page 36: PAIN

Central sensitization

Page 37: PAIN

Net Effect: recruitment of previously subthreshold inputs to cause pain

Produces pain hypersensitivity

Page 38: PAIN

Allodynia Hperalgesia

Page 39: PAIN

Fear avoidance

“higher fear avoidance, sensory pain, anxiety, depression, disability, and response to pain provocation test. This group demonstrated a greater likelihood of having allodynia (pain in response to non noxious stimuli) and was judged to have a dominant psychosocial component to presentation”

Page 40: PAIN

At baseline may predict chronicity

Page 41: PAIN

Short version

Page 42: PAIN

Long versionn