Pages FEl! EIiIISTEI

Pages 11983-12033

FEl! EIiIISTEINUMBER 235

Washington, Wednesday, December 5, 1962

ContentsTHE PRESIDENT

ProclamationPetroleum and petroleum prod-

ucts; modifying Proclamation3279 adjusting imports ------- 11985

EXECUTIVE AGENCIES

Agricultural Marketing ServicePROPOSED RULE MAI[NG:Onions grown in South Texas:

Handling of culls ------------ 11998Limitation of shipments ---- 11998

Agricultural Stabilization andConservation Service

PROPOSED RULE MAING:Milk in Philadelphia, Pa., and

Wilmington, Del., marketingareas; hearing; correction-., 11999

Agriculture DepartmentSee also Agricultural Marketing

Service; Agricultural Stabiliza-tion and Conservation Service.

NOTICES:Texas; designation of areas for

emergency loans ------------- 12006

Alien Property-OfficeNOTICES:Crtn trademarks vested during.World War n; disposition---- 12003

Army DepartmentSee Engineer's Corps.

Atomic Energy CommissionNOXICES:Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power

-Associates, Inc.; issuance of pro-, visional operating license ---- 12006

.a' Crosse Boiling Water Reactor;'application for construction au-thorization ---------------- 12006

-Civil Service CommissionRULES AND REGULATIONS:Defense Department; exception

from competitive service ---- 11989

Defense DepartmentSee Engineer's Corps.

Emergency Planning OfficeNOTICES:Tolan, John H.; appointee's state-

ment of business -interests --- 12012

Engineers CorpsRULES AND REGULATIONS:Bridge regulation; Tillamook- River, Oreg ----------------- 11995

Federal Aviation AgencyPROPOSED RULE MAKING:Airplane airworthiness; normal,

utility, acrobatic, and transportcategories ------------------ 11999

RULES Mill REGULATIONS:Airworthiness directives:

'Lockheed Models 188A and 188Caircraft - 11991

Piper PA-24 Series aircraft .... 11990Federal airway; alteration ------- 11989Federal airway, associated control

areas and reporting point;revocation ----------------- 11989

Jet routes and jet advisory areas;alteration ------------------ 11989

Federal CommunicationsCommission

NOTICES:Hearings, etc.:

Haggard, Dr. Charles H. andKenneth R. Rogers --------- 12007

Service Broadcasting Corp. andZ-B Broadcasting Co ------- 12007

Wellersburg TV, Inc. andPeople's Community Televi-sion Association, Inc ------- 12007

PROPOSED RULE MAKING:Practice and procedure; contents

of application --.------- 11999RULES AND REGULATIONS:

Commission organization; Execu-tive Director ---------------- 11996

Television broadcast stations,Bakersfield, California; table ofassignments ---------------- 11996

Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation

PROPOSED RULE MAKING:Bank service arrangements ---- 12000

Federal Maritime CommissionNOTICES:Agreements fied for approval:

Alcoa Steamship Co., et al-... 12Cunard Steam-Ship Co., Ltd.,

et al --------------- 12Japan/Atlantic Pool; modifica-

tions; extension of time forcomments ----- ----------- 12

T. R. Spedden and Samuel Sha-_piro j& Co., Inc ------------ 12

United States Lines Co. andWaterman Steamship Corp-- 12

Federal Power CommissionNOTICES:

Hearings, etc.:Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co----Central Maine Power Co. and

Skowhegan Water Power Co-Chicago Stock Yards Research

Co., et alCity of Jasonville, Indiana ....El Paso Natural Gas Co -------Natural Gas Pipeline Com-

pany of America ------------United Gas Pipe Line Co ------

007

:008

008

:008

:008

12008

12008

120091200912010

1201012011

Federal Reserve SystemPROPOSED RULE MAKING:Bank service arrangements -.... 12001

Federal Trade CommissionRULES AND REGULATIONS:Prohibited trade practices:

Mindlin's Inc., et al ---------- 11991Your Income Tax Records, Inc.,

and James W. Riley -------- 11992

Food and Drug AdministrationPROPOSED RULE MAKING:Food additives; filing of petitions

(2 documents) -------------- 11999RULES AND REGULATIONS:Food additives permitted in food

for human consumption; sorbi-tol ------------------------ 11995

(Continued on next page)

11983

11984

Health, Education, and WelfdreDepartment

See Food and Drug Administra-°tion.

Interior DepartmentSee Land Management Bureau. o

Interstate Commerce CommissionNOTICES:Fourth section applications forI relief ---------------------- 12013Motor carrier:

Alternate route deviation no-tices -------------------- 12012

Applications and certain otherproceedings --------------- 12014

Transfer proceedings --------- 12013Western Railroad Traffic Associ-

ation; application for approvalof amendments to agreemenL_ 12013

PROPOSED RULE MAYJNG:Pueblo, Colo., commercial zone;

definition ------------------ 12001

CONTENTS

Justice Department -See Alien Property Office.

Labor DepartmentSee Wage and Hour Division.

Land Management BureauNOTICES:Arizona; -filing of plat of survey

ad order providing for openingof. public lands -------------- 12003

California; proposed withdrawaland 'reservation of lands andpartial termination ---------- 12004.

Securities and ExchangeCommission

NOTICES:Orders summarily suspending

trading:Black Bear Industries, Inc____-

'Precision Microwave Corp ....* Prosper Oil and Mining Co ...

120111201112012

RULES AND REGULATIONS:Records to be maintained and pre-

served by registered investmentcompanies and others -------- 11993

Small Business AdministrationNOTICES:Manager, Disaster Field Office,

Guam; delegation relating to fi-nancial assistance functions--- 12012

Veterans AdministrationRULES AMD REGULATIONS:Adjudication; pension, compen-

sation, and dependency andindemnity compensation; pre-sumptive wartime service con-nection for chronic or tropicaldisease -------------------- 11995

Wage and Hour DivisionNOTICES:Certificates authorizing employ-

ment of learners at specialminimum rates -------------- 12032

CodificCation GuideThe following numerical guide is a list of the parts bf.each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by

documents published in today's issue.' A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date,appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month.

Monthly, quarterly, and annual cumulative guides, published separately from the daily issues, include thesection numbers as well as the part numbers affected.

3 CFRPROCLAMATIONS:3279 (modified by Proc. 3509) 119853290 (see Proc. 3509) ------------ 119853328 (see Proc. 3509) ------------ 11985"3386 (see Proc. 3509) ------------ 119853389 (see Proc. 3509) ------------ 119853509 -------------------------- 11985

5 CFR6 -------------------------------- 11989

7 CFRPROPOSED RULES:959 (2 documents) ------------ 119981004 ------------------------ 119991010 ------------------------ 11999

12 CFRPROPOSED RULES:219 ------------------------- 12001334 ---------------------------- 12000

14 CFR71 [New] (2 documents) ------- 1198975 (New] -------------------- 11989507 (2 documents) -------- 11990, 11991

PROPOSED RULES:3 ---------------- -------------- 119994b-------------------------- 11999

16 CFR13 (2 documents) ---------- 11991, 11992

17, CFR -270 ------------------------------ 11993

21 CFR121 ------------------------- 11995

PROPOSED RULES:121 ,(2 documents) ------------ 11999

33 CFR203 ---------------------------- 11995

38 CFR3 ------------ 11995

47 CFR0 ------------------------------ 119963-------------- ------------- 11996

PROPOSED RULES:1 --------------------------- 11999

49 CFRPROPOSED RULES:170 -------------- ------------ 12001

Announcing: Volume 75

UNITED STATESSTATUTES AT LARGE[87th Cong., 1st Sess.]

Contains laws and concurrent resolutionsenacted by the Congress during 1961,reorganization plans, amendment to the

Constitution, and Presidentialproclamations

Price:-$8.00

Published by Office of the Federal Register,National Archives and Records Service,

General Services AdministrationOrder from Superintendent of Documents,

Government Printing Office,Washington 25, D.C.

Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, and days following official Federal holidays,FE1)UiiI4 by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Serv-Telephone Mu ices Administration, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, ap-

Telephone worth 3-3261 proved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 US.C., ch. 8B), under regulations

prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President. Distribution is made only by theSuperintendent of Documents, Government Printing. Office, Washington 25, D.C.

The FDERAL RaISTER Wil be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable inadvance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or moneyorder, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, directly to the Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C.

The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the CoDE o' FDERAL REGULATIoNs, which is published, under 50 titles, pur-suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended August 5, 1953. The CODE ,OF FEDERAL REGULATrONS is sold by the Superin-tendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements vary.

There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the FEDEnAL R xLsTz, or the CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS.

Presidential DocumentsTitle 3-THE PRESIDENT

Proclamation 3509

MODIFYING PROCLAMATION 32791 ADJUSTING IMPORTS OFPETROLEUM AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

By the President of the United States of AmericaA Proclamation

WHEREAS, pursuant to section 2 of the act of July 1, 1954, asamended (72 Stat. 678), findings and determinations have been madethat adjustments in the imports of crude oil, unfinished oils, and fin-!shed products were necessary so that such imports would not threatento impair the national security, such adjustments have been made byProclamation 3279 (24 F.R. 1781) and modified by Proclamation3290 (24 F.R. 3527), Proclamation 3328 (24 F.R. 10133), Proclama-tion 3386 (25 F.R. 13945), and Proclamation 3389 (26 F.R. 507) ; and

WHrEREAS, under subsection (f), section 257, of the Trade Expan-sion Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-794), such actions are now deemedto have been taken pursuant to section 232 of that Act; andWHEREAS I find and determine that in order to enhance the abilityof the petroleum industry to meet possible national security demands,it is necessary to relate maximum levels of authorized imports intoDistricts I-IV to domestic production of crude oil and natural gas

-liquids and to adjust these levels; andWHEREAS I find and determine that certain revisions in the sys-

tem of allocating imports will operate to maintain the competitivecapability of refining companies of varying sizes nd thus strengthenthe national security:

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOHN F. KENNEDY, President of the.United States of America, acting under and by virtue of the authorityvested in me by the Constitution and the statutes, including section 232of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, do hereby proclaim that Proc-lamation 3279, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows:

1. Effective January 1, 1963, subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a)of section 2 is amended to read as follows:

(a) (1) In Districts I-IV, for a particulai allocation period themaximum level of imports, subject to allocation, of crude oil, unfin-ished oils, and finished products other than residual fuel oil to be usedas fuel shall be an amount equal to the difference between 12.2 percentof the quantity of crude oil and natural gas liquids produced in thesedistricts during the period of six months which ends six months priorto the beginning of the allocation period and the quantity of importsof crude oil, unfinished oils, and finished products excepted by clause(4) of paragraph (a) of section 1 which the Secretary of the Interiorestimates will be imported into Districts I-IV during the allocationperiod. As used in this subparagraph, the term "natural gas liquids"means natural gas products and other hydrocarbons such as isopentane,propane, butane, propylene, and butylene, or mixtures thereof, re-covered from natural gas by means other than refining. Within suchmaximum level, the imports of finished products other than residualfuel oil to be used as fuel shall not exceed the level of imports of 'suchproducts into these districts during the calendar year 1957 and importsof unfinished oils shall not exceed 10 percent of the permissible im-ports of crude oil and unfinished oils. The maximum level of imports,subject to allocation, of crude oil, unfinished oils, and finished productsother than residual fuel oil to be used as fuel which is determinedpursuant to the first sentence of this subparagraph for the allocationperiod beginning January 1, 1963 shall be increased or decreased by

13 CFR, 1959 Supp., p. 15; 24 F.R. 1781.

11985

THE PRESIDENT

9 percent of the amount by which the total demand estimated by theBureau of Mines for the allocation period that began January 1, 1962fell short of or exceeded the actual demand for that allocation periodand the maximum level so determined for the allocation period be-ginning July 1, 1963 shall be similarly adjusted on the basis of esti-mated and actual demand for the allocation period that began July1,1962.

2. Effective January 1, 1963, paragraph (c) of section 2 is revoked,and paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of that section are respectivelyredesignated as paragraphs (c), (d), alid (e).

3. As of the date of this amendatory proclamation, subparagraph(1) of paragraph (b) of section 3 is amended to read as follows:

(b) (1) With respect to the allocations of imports of crude oil andunfinished oils into Districts I-IV and into District V, such regula-tions shall provide, to the extent possible, for a fair and equitabledistribution among persons having refinery capacity in these districtsin relation to refinery inputs on the basis of a graduated scale (exclud-ing inputs of crude oil or unfinished oils imported pursuant to clause

of paragraph (a) of section 1) during an appropriate period orperiods selected by the Secretary. Provision shall be made in suchregulations for the gradual reduction of allocations made on the basis

of the last allocations of imports of crude oil under the VoluntaryOil Import rogram, except that provisions shall be made for a morerapid reduction of those allocations based on allocation under theVoluntary Oil Import Program which reflectedimports of crude oilin the category now covered by clause (4) of paragraph (a) ofsection 1.

4. Effective as of thedate of this amendatory proclamation the

second sentence of subparagraph (5) of paragraph (b) of section 3is am'ended to read as follows:

(5) * * * With respect to the allocation of imports into District Iof residual fuel oil to be used as fuel, such regulations shall, to theextent possible, provide for a fair and equitable distribution of im-ports of residual fuel oil to be used as fuel among persons who havebeen importers of that product into such district during the calendaryear 1957 and among persons who are in the business in District Iof selling residual fuel oil to be used as fuel and who have had inputsof that product to deep-water terminals located in District I, in rela-tion to such terminal inputs on the basis of a graduated scale. * * *

5. (a) Paragraph (f) of section 9 is amended to read as follows:

(f) "Crude oil" means crude petroleum as it is produced at the well-head and liquids (under atmospheric conditions) that have beenrecovered from mixtures of hydrocarbons which existed in a vaporousphase in a reservoir and that are not natural gas products;

(b) &- new subparagraph (9), reading as follows, is added to para-graph (g) of section 9:

(9) "natural gas products" means liquids (under atmospheric con-ditions), including natural gasoline, which are recovered by a processof absorption, adsorption, compression, refrigeration, cycling, or, acombination of such processes, from mixtures of hydrocarbons thatexisted in a vaporous phase in a reservoir and which, when recoveredand without processing in a refinery, otherwise fall within any of thedefinitions of products contained in clauses (2) through (5), inclusive,of this paragraph (g).

(c) The amendments set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of thissection 5 shall become effective upon the date of. this amendatoryproclamation with respect to the restrictions imposed by section 1of Proclamation 3279, as amended, and on J-anuary 1, 1963 withrespect to the maximum levels of imports prescribed by section 2 ofProclamation 3279, as amended, and, in connection with the makingof allocations, shall be effective with respect to the allocation periodbeginning July 1, 1963.

11986

Wednesday, December 5, 1962 FEDERAL REGISTER 11987

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand andcaused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed.

DONE at the City of Washington this 30th day of November inthe year of our Lord nineteen hundred and sixty-two, and

[s A.L] of the Independence of the United States of America theone hundred and eighty-seventh.

By the President:

DEIw RusE,Secretary of State.

[F.R. Doe. 62-12077; Filed, Dec. 3, 1962; 1:33 p.m.]

Rules and RegulationsTitle 5--ADMINISTRATIVE

PERSONNELChapter I-Civil Service Commission

PART 6-EXCEPTIONS FROM THECOMPETITIVE SERVICE

Department of Defense

Effective upon publication in the FED-ERAL REGISTER, subparagraph (47) isadded to paragraph (a) of § 6.304 as setout below..§ 6.304 Departnent of Defense.

(a) -Office of the Secretary. * * *

(47) One Confidential Assistant to theAssistant Secretary of Defense (Installa-tions and Logistics).(R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended;5 U.S.C. 631, 633)

UNITED STATES CIVIL SERV-

ICE COMTISSION,[SEAL] MARY V. WENZEL,

Executive Assistant tothe Commissioners.

[P.R. Doc. 62-12006; Piled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 am.]

Title 14-AERONAUTICS ANDSPACE

Chapter I-Federal Aviation Agency

SUBCHAPTER E-AIRSPACE [NEW][Airspace Docket No. 62-CE-41]

PART 71-DESIGNATION OF FEDERALAIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR-SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS[NEW]

Alteration of Federal Airway

On July 31, 1962, a notice of proposedrule making was published in the FED-ERAL REGISTER (27 F.R. 7502) stating thatthe Federal Aviation Agency was consid-ering the alteration of segments of inter-mediate altitude VOR Federal airwaysNo. 1525, 1532 and 1626.

The Air Transport Association ofAmerica submitted a comment concur-ring with the proposal. No other com-ments were received.

Subsequent to the issuance of thenotice, Parts 600 and 601 of the regula-tions of the Administrator have beenconsolidated and recodified into a newPart 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula-tions which will become effective Decem-ber 12, 1962 (27 F.R. 10352, 220-2). Theairspace actions taken herein reflect thenew format 'and numbering systemadopted for these parts.

Interested persons have been affordedan opportunity to participate in the mak-ing of the rules herein adopted, and dueconsideration has been given to all rele-vant matter presented.

The substance of the proposed amend-ments having been published, therefore,pursuant to the authority delegated tome by the Administrator (25 F.R. 12582)and for the reasons stated in the notice§ 71.143 (27 F.R. 220-38, November 10,1962) is amended as follows:

1. V-1525 is amended as follows:In the text "INT Farmington 351,

Troy, Ill., 233- radials; 10 miles wideTroy; Roberts, Ill.;" is deleted and "INTFarmington 351', Troy, Ill., 2340 radials;Troy; Roberts, 11.;" is substituted there-for.

2. V-1532 is amended-as follows:In the text "INT Tulsa 0590, Spring-

field, Mo., 2400 radials; Springfield;Vichy, Mo.; Troy, Ill.," is deleted and"Fayetteville, Ark.; INT Fayetteville0520, Maples, Mo., 2370 radials; Maples;INT Maples 0500, Troy, Ill., 2340 radials;Troy;" is substituted therefor.

3. V-1626 is amended as follows:In the text "10 miles wide Tulsa." is

deleted and "10 miles wide Tulsa; thenceSpringfield, Mo.; Vichy, Mo.; St. Louis,Mo.". is substituted.

These amendments shall become effec-tive 0001, e.s.t., February 7, 1963.(Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348)

Issued in Washington, D.C., on Novem-ber 29, 1962.

CLIFFORD P. BURTON,Chief,

Airspace Utilization -Division.

[F.R. Doc. 62-11979; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:46 am.]

[Airspace Docket No. 61-NY-97]

PART 71-DESIGNATION OF FEDERALAIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR-SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS[NEW]

Revocation of Federal Airway, Asso-ciated Control Areas and ReportingPoint

On July 4, 1962, a notice of proposedrule making was published in the FED-ERAL REGISTER (27 FR. 6336) stating that-the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) pro--posed to revoke the United States seg-ments of Red Federal airway No. 20, itsassociated control areas and reportingpoint from Windsor, Ontario, Canada,to Cleveland, Ohio, from Pittsburgh, Pa.,to Martinsburg, W. Va., and from Wash-ington, D.C., to Meekins Neck, Va.

Subsequent to the issuance of the no-tice, Parts 600 and 601 of the regulationsof the Administrator have been con-solidated and recodified into a new Part71 of the Federal Aviation Regulationswhich will become effective December 12,1962 (27 F.R. 10352, 220-2). The air-space actions taken herein reflect thenew format and numbering systemadopted for these parts.

The Air Transport Association ofAmerica objected to the proposed

amendments because they did not believethat the route covered by Red 20 wasadequately served by VOR Federal air-ways. They agreed to withdraw theirobjection if a VOR airway were desig-nated to approximate the alignment ofRed 20. The Federal Aviation Agencyhas reviewed the ATA's comments andhas determined that use of Red 20 forIFR traic would interfere with the traf-fic control procedures in the Clevelandarea. Therefore, the airway could notbe utilized unless traffic flow changes aremade. The FAA agrees with the ATAthat existing VOR Federal airways donot coincide with Red 20; however, theexisting VOR Federal airways utilizedin conjunction with the traffic controlprocedures do adequately serve the routeformerly served by Red 20. Accordingly,action is taken herein to revoke theUnited States segments of Red 20 be-tween Windsor and Meekins Neck andthe Mt. Pleasant reporting point.

No other adverse comments werereceived.

Interested persons have been affordedan opportunity to participate in themaking of the rules herein adopted, anddue consideration has been given to allrelevant matter presented.

The substance of the proposed amend-ments having been published, therefore,pursuant to the authority delegated tome by the Administrator (25 F.R. 12582)and for the reasons stated in the notice,the following actions are taken:

1. Section 71.107 (27 F.R. 220-4,November 10, 1962) is amended asfollows:

a. In R-20 all after "Windsor, Ont.,Canada, RR;" is deleted and "Windsor,Ont., Canada, RR; to the Windsor RR."is substituted therefor.

b. In § 71.203 (27 F.R. 220-157, No-vember 10, 1962) "Mt. Pleasant INT:INT SE course Pittsburgh, Pa., RR, NEcourse Morgantown, W. Va., RR." isdeleted.

These amendments shall become effec-tive 0001, e.s.t., February 7, 1963.(Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348)

Issued in Washington, D.C., onNovember 28, 1962.


Airspace Utilization Division.

[P.R. Doc. 62-11980; Piled, Dec. 4, 1962;3:46 am.]

[Airspace Docket No..61-LA-122]

PART 75-ESTABLISHMENT OF JETROUTES [NEW]

Alteration of Jet Routes and JetAdvisory Areas

On August 8, 1962, a notice of proposedrule making was published in the FED-ERAL REGISTER (27 F.R. 7826) stating thatthe Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) pro-

11989

RULES AND REGULATIONS

posed to realign and extend Jet RouteNo. 88, realign a segment of Jet RouteNo: 1, revoke a segment of Jet Route No.3, extend Jet Route No. 6, and to desig-nate an en route radar jet advisory areaon J-88 from Los Angeles, Calif., toOakland, Calif.

The Air Transport Association ofAmerica did not object to the proposal,but it was their -understanding that asupplemental proposal was to be issuedwhich would realign J-88 from Salinasto the San Francisco TVOR, and extendit to Medford, Oreg., via Ukiah, Calif.,cancelling out the present "dogleg" be-tween Salinas, Calif., and Oakland, Calif.This understanding is partially in error.An informal discussion did include align-ment of J-88 over the San FranciscoVOR, however, this was later determinedto be impracticable. Jet Route 88 asproposed will permit Bay area terminaltraffic to transition to and from the In-termediate airway system. It is notplanned to use J-88 for en route jettraffic through -the San Francisco Bayarea, therefore, the "dogleg" is notpertinent to this proposal. A proposalwill be made (Airspace Docket No. 62-WA-78) to extend J-88 to the Medford,Oreg., VORTAC. No other commentswere received.

Subsequent to the issuance of the no-tice, Part 602 of the regulations.of the,Administrator has been recodified into anew Part 75 of the Federal Aviation Reg-ulations which will become effective De-cember 12, 1962 (27 FR. 10352). Theairspace actions taken herein reflect thenew format and numbering systemadopted for this Part.

Interested persons have been affordedan opportunity to participate in themaking of the rules herein adopted, anddue consideration has been given to allrelevant matter presented.

The substance of the proposek amend-ment having been published, therefore,pursuant to the authority delegated tome by the Administrator (25 FR. 12582)and for the reasons stated in the notice,the following actions are taken:

1. In § 75.100 Jet Routes (27 F.R. 7304,10357) Jet Route No. 88 is amended asfollows:

a. The caption is changed to read:"'Jet Route No. 88 (Los Angeles, Calif.,to Oakland, Calif.) ."

b. The text is changed to read: "FromLos Angeles, Calif., via INT of the LosAngeles 301' and the Santa Barbara,Calif., 109' radials; Santa Barbara,Salinas, Calif.; INT of the Salinas 310'and the Oakland, Calif., 170' radials; toOakland." -

2. In § 75.100 Jet Routes (27 P.R. 7304,10357) Jet Route No. 1 is amended asfollows:

In the text "Los Angeles, Calif.; Ave-nal, Calif.;" is deleted and "Los, Angeles,Calif.; INT of the Los Angeles 3160 andthe Avenal, Calif., 145' radials; Avenal";is substituted therefor.

3. In .§ 75.100 Jet Routes (27 F.R. 7304,10357) Jet Route No. 3 is amended asfollows:

a. In the caption "San Diego, Calif.,"is deleted and "Oakland, Calif.," is sub-stituted therefor.

b. In the text "From San Diego, Calif.,via Oceanside, Calif.; Los Angeles, Calif.;INT of the Palmdale, Calif., 291 ° and theBakersfield, Calif., 149 ° radials; Bakers-field; Oakland, Calif.;" is deleted and"From Oakland, Calif., via" is substitutdtherefor.

4. In § 75.100 Jet Routes (27 F.R. 7304,7019, 7388, 10357) Jet Route No. 6 isamended as follows:

a. In the caption "FelloWs, Calif.," isdeleted and "Paso Robles, Calif." is sub-stituted therefor.

b. In the text "From the INT of theAvenal, Calif., 142' is deleted and "Fromthe INT of the Salinas, Calif., '145' issubstituted therefor.

5. In § 75.200 En Route Jet AdvisoryAreas (27 F.R. 7312, 7019, 10357) JetRoute No. 6 is amended to read:

Jet Route No. 6 jet advisory area. Radar-From INT of Salinas, Calif., 145' and thePalmdale, Calif., 291' radials, to Idlewild,N.Y.

6. In § 75.200 En Route Jet AdvisoryAreas (27 F.R. 7312, 10357) the follow-ing is added: 11

Jet Route No. 88 let advisory area. Radar-Los Angeles, Calif., to Oakland, Calif.

These amendments shall become effec-tive 0001, e.s.t., February 7, 1963.(See. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348)

Issued in Washington, D.C., on No-vember 28, 1962.


Airspace Utilization Division.[F.R. Doc. 62-11981; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:46 am.]

Chapter Ill-Federal Aviation Agency

SUBCHAPTER C-AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS-[Reg. Docket No. 1503; Amdt. 511]

PART- 507-AIRWORTHINESSDIRECTIVES

Piper PA-24 Series Aircraft

There'have been cracks found in. themuffler heater shroud on Piper PA-24Series aircraft. Such failures can causehazardous carbon monoxide contamina-tion in the airplane cockpit. As this con-dition is likely to develop in other air-planes of the same type design, an air-worthiness directive is being issued torequire modification or replacement ofthe muffler shroud.

As a situation exists which dgmandsimmediate action in the interest ofsafety, it is found that notice and publicprocedure hereon are impracticable andgood cause exists for making this amend-ment effective upon publication in theFEDERAL REGISTER.

In consideration of the foregoing, andpursuant to the authority delegated tome by the Administrator (25 FR. 6489),§ 507.10(a) of Part 507 (14 CFR Part507), is hereby amended by adding thefollowing new airworthiness directive':

PIPER. Applies to all Models PA-24 and PA-24"250" aircraft.

Compliance required within the next 50hours' time in service after the effectivedate of this AD, unless already accomplished.

To preclude hazardous carbon monoxidecontamination in the cockpit and enginepower loss, caused by cracked muffler heatershrouds, accomplish the following:

(a) For aircraft Serial Numbers 24-1 to24-2298 ihclusive, equipped with channelreinforced muffler P/N's 22594-00, 22594-02 onPA-24, and P/N's 22593-00, 23159-00 onPA-24"250" installed as service replacements:

(1) Remove the tail pipe, the right-handexhaust stack, and carburetor heat shroudand inspect for cracks and hot spots. Payparticular attention to the junction of rearcylinder exhaust tube with the stack as-sembly.

(2) Remove the muffler and muffler heatershroud. Carefully inspect the muffler forvisible cracks, particularly in the area nearthe tall pipe opening and examine the in-ternal baffle and perforated tube. Submergethe muffler in water and pressure test at10 p.s.i.

(3) Replace the muffler prior to furtherflight if cracks, heat deterioration, defects,or wrinkles formed in the perforated tube areobserved or if leaks are detected during thepressure test.

(4) Rework the muffler heater shroud by:(I) enlarging the opening in the shroud

in accordance with the Piper template;(ii), installing the muffler reinforcement

tube, P/N 23482-00 using 20 rivets PDR134A-6, or FAA approved equivalent; and

(iii) installing cover plate P/N 23498-00using 11 rivets AN 426A3-4, or FAA approvedequivalent, in accordance with Piper Im-mediate Action Service BulletinNo. 210(Kit P/N 754 484).

(5) Reinstall the muffler exhaust stacks,talpipe, and air ducts on the airplane.

(b) For' aircraft Serial Numbers 24-2299 to24-3284 inclusive, equipped with channel re-inforced muffler P/N's 22594-00, 22594-02 onPA-24, and P/N's 22593-00, 23159-00 on PA-24"250", except aircraft Serial Numbers 24-2876, 24-2929, 24-2949, 2-2967, 24-2990,24-3033, 24-3095, 24-3114, 24-3130, 24-3150,24-3155, 24-3173, 24-3191, 24-3193, 24-3194,24-3196, 24-3198, 24-3203, 24-3204, 24-3222,24-3233, 24-3234, 24-3241, 24-3244, 24-3248,24-3254, 24-3257, 24-3258, 24-3265, 24-3268,24-3270, 24-3273, 24-3274. 24-3276, 24-3277,24-3278, 24-3279, 24-3280, 24-3282, 24-3283,which have been modified:

(1) Perform inspections required by (a) (1)and (a) (2), and the replacement requiredby (a) (3) -if necessary.

(2) Install new cabin heater shroud, P/N23507-00 on PA-24, and P/N 23489-00 onPA-24"250". Center the tailpipe in theshroud tailpipe opening.

(3) Reinstall the muffler exhaust stacks,tailpipe, and air ducts on airplane.

NOTE: PA-24 and PA-24"250" mufflers havebeen manufactured incorporating two differ-ent styles of tailpipe reinforcement brackets.This AD requires modification of one styleonly-those with channel style reinforce-ment. See Sketch A of Piper Service BulletinNo. 210 for further Identification. Both typesof mufilers have been sold as service replace-ments. It will therefore be necessary to ex-amine aircraft Serial Numbers 24-1 to 24-2587inclusive, if the original muffler has been re-placed, to determine if the modification is re-quired. Aircraft Serial Numbers 24-2588through 24-3284, were manufactured with thechannel shaped reinforcement and will re-quire modification except those already modi-fied as indicated.

, (Use Piper Service Letter No. 324B as aguide for inspections in addition to ServiceBulletin No. 210.)

11990

Wednesday, December 5, 1962

This amendment shall become effec-tive December 5, 1962.(Sees. 313 (a), 601, 603; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776;49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423)

Issued in Washington, D.C., on Novem-ber 29, 1962.

G. S. MOORE,Acting Director,

Flight Standards Service.


[Regulatory Docket No. 1447; Amdt. 514]

PART 507-AIRWORTHINESSDIRECTIVES

Lockheed Models 188A and 188CAircraft

Notice of proposed rule making re-quiring inspection of the elevator bal-ance weight arms on Lockheed 188 air-craft and replacement of any foundcracked, was published in 27 F.R. 10502.Subsequent to the issuance of the noticeof proposed rule making, it was foundthat cracks were occurring in other areasof the balance weight arms than thatcovered by the proposal and they were ofa transverse nature which is more seri-ous than the longitudinal cracks origi-nally found. Because of this new infor-mation, it was considered necessary, inthe interest of safety to require a moreimmediate inspection. This was done bymeans of a telegram sent on November23, 1962, to all known United States oper-ators of Lockheed 188 aircraft. As a re-sult of further investigation by the FAAand the manufacturer, a rework of thebalance weight arms was developed. Asthis rework was not incorporated in thetelegram, this airworthiness directive isbeing issued to supersede the telegramand the notice of proposed rule makingIs hereby withdrawn.

As a situation exists which demandsimmediate action in the interest ofsafety, it is found that notice and publicprocedure hereon are impracticable andgood cause exists for making this amend-ment effective upon publication in theFEDERAL REGISTER.

In consideration of the foregoing, andpursuant to the authority delegated tome by the Administrator (25 FR. 6489),§ 507.10(a) of Part 507 (14 CFR Part507), is hereby amended by adding thefollowing new airworthiness directive:

LocNKmEE. Applies to all Model 188A andModel 188C aircraft.

Compliance required as indicated.To permit early detection of cracks in

both the closed and open section type eleva-tor balance weight arms and to assure reworkof uncracked arms and replacement ofcracked arms, the failure of which couldcause jamming of the elevator or adverselyaffect protection against flutter, the follow-ing shall be accomplished:

(a) Unless already accomplished withinthe last 75 hours' time in service prior tothe effective date of this AD, all elevator bal-ance weight arms of the closed (square tube)type shall, within the next 100 hours' timein service following the effective date of thisAD anfd at intervals thereafter not to exceed175 hours' time in service from the last in-spection, be inspected in the manner pre-

No. 235-2

FEDERAL REG1STiR

scribed in (c). Any closed type arm found tobe cracked shall be replaced prior to furtherflight with an uncracked closed type arm ofthe same part number, with an uncrackedopen type arm of the proper part number asprescribed by Lockheed Field Service LetterFS/249931L or with an FAA engineering ap-proved replacement arm. The replacementshall be accomplished in accordance withLockheed Service Bulletin 88/SB-567, Revi-sion 1, or FAA engineering approved equiva-lent.

(b) Unless already accomplished withinthe last 250 hours' time in service prior tothe effective date of this AD, all elevatorbalance weight arms of the open (C---sec-tion) type shall, within the next 100 hours'time in service following the effective dateof this AD and at intervals thereafter notto exceed 350 hours' time in service from thelast inspection, be inspected in the mannerprescribed in (c). Any open type arm foundto be cracked shall be replaced prior to fur-ther flight with an uncracked arm of thesame part number or with an FAA engineer-ing approved equivalent arm. The replace-ment shall be accomplished in accordancewith Lockheed Service Bulletin 88/SB-567,Revision 1, or FAA engineering approvedequivalent.

(c) Conduct close visual inspections ofall external exposed surfaces of both typesof arms and of the inner surfaces of opentype arms in areas where external surfacesare hidden by clips. The close visual inspec-tions shall be made with a magnifying glassor magnifying mirror of at least 3X magni-fication, with the elevator in fullup positionand with all elevator access doors at thetrailing edge of the horizontal stabilizer, inthe open position.

(d) Within 350 hours' time in service afterthe effective date of this AD, all balanceweight arms inspected per (a) and (b) andfound to be uncracked shall, unless alreadyaccomplished, be reworked in the manner de-scribed by paragraphs B(2) through B(6)of Lockheed Service Bulletin 88/SB-567,Revision I, or in an FAA engineeringapproved equivalent manner.

(e) Closed type replacement arms installedper (a) and closed type uncracked arms re-worked per (d) are subject to the inspectionfor cracks in accordance with (c) at intervalsnot to exceed 175 hours' time in service.Open type replacement arms installed per(a) or (b) and open type uncracked armsreworked per (d) are subject to the inspec-tion for cracks in accordance with (c) atintervals not to exceed 350 hours' time inservice. (FAA engineering approved equiva-lent replacement arms installed per (a) or(b) will be subject to such special inspec-tions as may be prescribed by FAA in con-junction with the approval of the use ofsuch arms.)

(f) Upon request of the operator, an FAAmaintenance inspector, subject to prior ap-'proval of the Chief, Engineering and Manu-facturing Branch, FAA Western Region, mayadjust the repetitive inspection intervalsspecified in this Airworthiness Directive topermit compliance at an established inspec-tion period of the operator if the requestcontains substantiating data to justify theincrease for such operator.

(Lockheed Field Service Letters PS/249931L, dated September 9, 1960, FS/250044L, dated November 28, 1960, and Serv-ice Bulletin 88/SB-567, Revision 1, coverthis same subject.)

This supersedes the AirworthinessDirective on the same subject issued and

made effective by telegram dated No-vember 23, 1962.

This amendment shall become effec-tive December 4, 1962.

11991

(Sacs. 313(a), 60f, 603; 72 Stat. '752, 775, 776;49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423)

Issued in Washington, DC., on No-vember 30, 1962.

G. S. MooRE,Acting Director,

Flight Standards Service.

[F.R. Doc. 62-12076; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:52 an.]

Title 16-COMMERCIALPRACTICES

Chapter I-Federal Trade Commission[Docket C-2681

PART 13-PROHIBITED TRADEPRACTICES

Mindlin's, Inc., et al.

Subpart-Advertising falsely or mis-leadingly: § 13.155 Prices; § 13.155-40Exaggerated as regular and customary.Subpart-Invoicing products falsely:§ 13.1108 Invoicing products falsely;§ 13.1108-45 Fur Products Labeling Act.Subpart--Misbranding or mislabeling:§ 13.1185 Composition; § 13.1185-30 FurProducts Labeling Act; § 13.1212 Formalregulatory and statutory requirements;§ 13.1212-30 Fur Products Labeling Act;§ 13.1255 Manufacture or preparation;§ 13.1255-30 Fur Products Labeling Act;§ 13.1280 Price. Subpart-Neglecting,unfairly or deceptively, to make materialdisclosure: § 13.1845 Composition; § 13.-1845-30 Fur Products Labeling Act;§ 13.1852 Formal regulatory and statu-tory requirements; § 13.1852-35 FurProducts Labeling Act; § 13.1865 Manu-facture or preparation; § 13.1865-40 FurProducts Labeling Act; § 13.1900 Sourceor origin; § 13.1900-40 Fur Products La-beling Act; § 13.1900-40 (a) Maker orseller; § 13.1900-40(b) Place.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpretor apply see. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; sec.8, 65 Stat. 179; 15 U.S.C. 45, 69f) [Cease anddesist order, Mindlin's, Inc., et al., KansasCity, Mo., Docket C-268, Nov. 15, 1962]

In the Matter of Mindlin's, Inc., a Corpo-ration, Harold S. Mindlin, Individuallyand as Officer of Said Corporation,and Alexander Meltzer, Individuallyand as Fur Buyer and Manager of theFur Department of Said Corporation

Consent order requiring Xansas City,Mo., retailers of fur products to ceaseviolating the Fur Products Labeling Actby failing to show on labels and invoicesand in advertising the true names of ani-mals producing certain furs, and failingin labeling and invoicing to disclose thecountry of origin of imported furs, andto use the term "natural" where re-quired; labeling fur products falsely as tothe names of animals producing certainfurs and to show that artificially coloredfurs were natural, and tagging themwith fictitious prices; failing in labelingto disclose when fur was artificiallycolored, to identify the manufacturer,etc., and to use the term "Persian Lamb"as required; failing to use on invoices theterms "Dyed Broadtail-processed Lamb"


and "Dyed Mouton Lamb"; by advertis-ing in newspapers which represented ex-cessive amounts as usual retail prices;failing to maintain adequate records asa basis for pricing and value claims; andfailing in other respects to comply withlabeling and invoicing requirements.

The order to cease and desist, includ-ing further order requiring report ofcompliance therewith, is as follows:,

It is ordered, That respondents, Mind-lin's Inc., a corporation, and its officers,and Harold S. Mindlin, individuallyand as an officer of said corporation,and Alexander Meltzer, individually andas fur buyer and manager of the furdepartment of the corporate respondent,and respondents' representatives, agentsand employees, directly or through anycorporate or other device, in connectionwith the introduction into commerce, orthe sale, advertising, or offering for salein commerce or the transportation ordistribution in commerce of any furproduct; or in connection with the sale,advertising, offering for sale, transpor-tation, or distribution of any fur prod-uct which is made in whole or in partof fur which has been shipped and re-ceived in commerce, as "commerce","fur" and "fur product" are defined inthe Fur Products Labeling Act, do forth-with cease and desist from:

A. Misbranding fur products by:1. Failing to affix labels to fur prod-

ucts showing in words and figures plainlylegible all the information required tobe disclosed by each of the subsectionsof Section 4(2) of the Fur ProductsLabeling Act.

2. Representing directly or by implica-tion on labels that the fur contained infur products is natural when such furis pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed orotherwise artificially colored.

3. Falsely or deceptively labeling orotherwise identifying any such productas to the name or names of the animalor animals that produced the fur fromwhich such product was manufactured.

4. Falsely or deceptively labeling orotherwise identifying such products asto the regular prices thereof by any rep-resentation that the regular or usualprices of such products are any amountin excess of the prices at which respond-ents have usually and customarily soldsuch products in the recent regularcourse of business.

5. Setting forth on labels affixed to furproducts information required undersection 4(2) of the Fur Products LabelingAct and the rules and regulationspromulgated thereunder in abbreviatedform.

6. Failing to set forth the term "Per-sian Lamb" in the manner requiredwhere an election is made to use thatterm instead of the term "Lamb".

7. Failing to set forth information re-quired under section 4(2) of the FurProducts Labeling Act and the rules andregulations promulgated thereunder inthe sequence required by Rule 30 of saidrules and regulations.

8. Failing to set forth separately onlabels attached to fur products composedof two or more sections containing dif-ferent animal furs the information re-

quired under section 4(2) of the FurProducts Labeling Act and the rules andregulations promulgated thereunder withrespect to the fur comprising eachsection.

9. Failing to set forth on labels theitem number or mark assigned to a furproduct.

10. Failing to describe fur products asnatural when such fur products are notpointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed orotherwise artificially colored. /

11. Failing to set forth all the infor-mation required to be disclosed by sec-tion 4(2) of the Fur Products LabelingAct and the rules and regulations pro-mulgated thereunder on one side oflabels.

B. Falsely or deceptively invoicing furproducts by:

1. Failing to furnish invoices to pur-chasers of fur products showing inwords and figures plainly legible all theinformation required to be disclosed byeach of, the subsections of section 5(b)(1) of'the Fur Products Labeling Act.

2. Setting forth information requiredunder section 5(b) (1) of the Fur Prod-ucts Labeling Act and the rules and reg-ulations promulgated thereunder in ab-breviated form.

3. Failing to set forth the term "DyedMouton Lamb" in the manner requiredwhere an election is made to use thatterm instead of the term "Dyed Lamb".

4. Failing to tet forth the term "DyedBroadtail-processed Lamb" in the man-ner required where an election is madeto use that term instead of the term"Dyed Lamb".

5. Failing to describe fur products asnatural when such fur products are notpointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed orotherwise artificially colored..C. Falsely or deceptively advertisingfur products through the use of any ad-vertisement, representation, public an-nouncement or notice which is intendedto aid, promote or assist, directly or in-directiy, in the sale, or offering for saleof fur products, and which:

1. Fails to set forth all the informa-tion required to be disclosed by each ofthe subsections of section 5(a) of theFur Products Labeling Act.

2. Represents directly or by implica-tion that the regular or usual price ofany fur product is any amount in excessof the price at which respondents haveregularly and usually sold such productsin the recent regular course of business.

3. Misrepresents directly or by impli-cation that any such products are thestock of a business in a state of liquida-tion.

4. Misrepresents in any manner thatsavings are available to purchasers ofrespondents' fur products.

D. Making claims and representationsof the types covered by subsections (a),(b), (c) and (d) of Rule 44 of the rulesand regulations promulgated under the-Fur Products Labeling Act unless thereare maintained by respondents full andadequate records disclosing the' factsupon which such claims and representa-tions are based.

It is further ordered, That the re-spondents herein shall, within sixty (60)days after service upon them of this or-

der, file with the Commission a reportin writing setting forth in detail themanner and form in which they havecomplied with this order.

Issued: November 15, 1962.

By the Commission.

[SEAL] JOSEPH W. SHEA,Secretary.

[F.R. Doc. 62-11994; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:48 a.m.)

[Docket C-269]

PART 13-PROHIBITED TRADEPRACTICES

Your Income Tax Records, Inc.and James W. Riley

Subpart-Advertising falsely or mis-leadingly; § 13.15 Business status, ad-vantages, or connections; § 13.15-255Reputation, success, or standing; § 13.15-278 Time in business; § 13.15-280 Uniqueor special status or advantages; § 13.60Earnings and profits; § 13.110 Indorse-ments, approval and testimonials; § 13.-143 Opportunities. Subpart-Claimingor using indorsements or testimonialsfalsely or misleadingly: § 13.33 Claimingor using indorsements or testimonialsfalsely or misleadingly; § 13.330-21Chamber of Commerce.(See. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpretor apply see. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15U.S.C. 45) [Cease and desist order, Your In-come Tax Records, Inc., et al., New York,N.Y., Docket C-269, Nov. 15, 1962]

In the Matter of Your Income Tax Rec-ords, Inc., a Corporation, and JamesW. Riley, Individually and as an Officerof Said Corporation

Consent order requiring New York Citysellers, through their franchised distrib-utors, of a combined record keepingsystem and tax service for small busi-nesses, to cease-in advertisements innewspapers, brochures, and other ad-vertising material to induce the purchaseof distributorships-misrepresenting dis-tributors' earnings and opportunities forprofits, respondents' time in business,experience and importance, approval oftheir system by banks, etc., as in theorder below set forth in detail.

The order to cease and desist, includ-ing further order requiring report ofcompliance therewith, is as follows:

It is ordered, That respondents YourIncome Tax Records, Inc., a corporation,and its officers, and James W. Riley,individually and as an officer of said cor-poration, and respondents' agents, rep-resentatives and employees, directly orthrough any corporate or other device,in connection with the offering for sale,sale or distribution of business recordkeeping systems and tax services in com-merce as "commerce" is defined in theFederal Trade Commission Act, do forth-with cease and desist representing di-rectly or indirectly to prospective dis-tributors of such record keeping systems:

1. That purchasers of respondents'distributorships are assured of earningsubstantial incomes that will increaseyearly.

11992


2. That the sale of distributorshipsconfers absolute ownership thereof onthe purchasers or that a permanent busi-ness affiliation between the parties iscreated by such sale, without disclosingthat the permanency of such ownershipor affiliation is dependent on purchasers'conformance with the terms and condi-tions set out in franchise agreements.

3. That distributors are assured of re-couping the purchase price of distribu-torships within six months, or any otherspecified period of time.

4. That the net profit of a new distrib-utor in his first year of operation willexceed the purchase price of such dis-tributorships or that any distributor isassured of earnings amounting to $10,000in his first year of operation; or mis-representing in any manner the netprofit of earnings to be made by distrib-utors in the first year of operation.

5(a) That distributors customarily ortypically employ associate distributors.

(b) That distributors employing asso-ciate distributors will or are likely toearn an additional income in the amountfrom$5,200 to $10,400 per year.

(c) That distributors employing as-sociate distributors will realize a profitfrom their own sales and those of as-sociate distributors in the amount of$19,500 to $24,700 per year.

6. That profits or earnings to be real-ized by distributors will be any amountin excess of the average earnings orprofits in fact being realized or derivedby respondents' distributors similarlyengaged in selling respondents' systemsand services.

7. That distributors can establish theirown retirement funds by automatic re-newals' of the service by subscribers with-out requiring any further effort on thepart of distributors.

8. That distributors will be able todevote their time exclusively to makingsales.

9. That Your Income Tax Records,Inc., is the only organization engaged inthe sale of record keeping systems andtax service which has a full time staffor its own income tax library.

10. That Your Income Tax Records,Inc., has been in the business recordkeeping and tax service business for 18years, or any other period of time not inaccordance with fact.

11. That Your Income Tax Records,Inc., has prepared over 250,000 incometax returns or any number of incometax returns not in accordance with fact.

12. That Your Income Tax Records,Inc., is the most experienced organiza-tion of its kind in the United States; ormisrepresenting in any manner the busi-ness experience of respondents.

13. That respondents' system or serv-ices are approved, or are recognized asbeing unique, by banks, chambers ofcommerce or credit institutions through-out the United States; or mispresentingin any manner the approval or recog-nition of said systems or services byothers.

It is further ordered, That the re-spondents herein shall, within sixty (60)days after service upon them of this or-der, file with the Commission a report inwriting setting forth in detail the man-

FEDERAL REGISTER

ner and form in which they have com-plied with this order.

Issued: November 15, 1962.

By the Commission.

[SEAL] JOSEPH W. SHEA,Secretary.

[P.R. Doe. 62-11995; -Eled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 am.]

Title 17-COMMODITY ANDSECURITIES EXCHANGES

Chapter lI-Securities and ExchangeCommission

[nelease 40-3578]

PART 270-RULES AND REGULA-TIONS, INVESTMENT COMPANYACT OF 1940

Records To Be Maintained and Pre-served by Registered InvestmentCompanies and OthersOn November 28, 1961, in Investient

Company Act Release No. 3368, and onDecember 12, 1961, in the FEDERALREGISTER (26 F.R. 11738), the Commis-sion published its proposal to amendRules 31a-1 and 31a-2 (§§ 270.31a-1 and270.31a-2) and to adopt a new Rule31a-3 (§ 270.31a-3) under the Invest-ment Company Act of 1940. The Com-mission has considered the commentsand suggestions made on the proposaland has adopted the amendments andthe new rule in the form stated below.

The text of the Commission's actionfollows:

The Commission, acting pursuant tothe provisions of the Investment Com-pany Act of 1940, particularly section 31thereof, and deeming such action neces-sary and appropriate in the public inter-est and for the protection of investors,and necessary for the exercise of its func-tions under the Act, hereby amends§§ 270.31a-1 and 270.31a-2 and adopts anew § 270.31a-3 thereunder as statedbelow. Such amendments and such newrule shall be effective January 1, 1963.The text of the amended rules and thenew rule follows:§ 270.31a-1 Records to be maintained

by registered investment companies,certain majority-owned subsidiariesthereof, and other persons havingtransactions with registered invest-ment companies.

(a) Every registered investment com-pany, and every underwriter, broker,dealer, or investment adviser which is amajority-owned subsidiary of such acompany, shall maintain and keep cur-rent the accounts, books, and otherdocuments relating to its business whichconstitute the record forming the basisfor financial statements required to befiled pursuant to Section 30 of the In-vestment Company Act of 1940 and ofthe auditor's certificates relating thereto.

(b) Every registered investment com-pany shall maintain and keep currentthe following books, accounts, and otherdocuments:

(1) Journals (or other records oforiginal entry) containing an itemizeddaily record in detail of-all purchases andsales -of securities (including sales andredemptions of its own securities), allreceipts and deliveries of securities (in-cluding certificate numbers if such de-tail is not recorded by custodian or trans-fer agent), all receipts and disburse-ments of cash and all other debits andcredits. Such records shall show foreach such transaction the name andquantity of securities, the unit and aggre-gate purchase or sale price, commissionpaid, the market on which effected, thetrade date, the settlement date, and thename of the person through or fromwhom purchased or received or to whomsold or delivered.

(2) General and auxiliary ledgers (orother records) reflecting all assets, lia-bility, reserve, capital, income and ex-pense accounts, including:

(i) Separate ledger accounts (or otherrecords) reflecting the following:

(a) Securities in transfer; (b) Secu-rities in physical possession; (c) Secu-rities borrowed and securities loaned;(d) Monies borrowed and monies loaned(together with a record of the collateraltherefor and substitutions in suchcollateral) ; (e) Dividends and interestreceived; (W Dividends receivable andinterest accrued.

.NsTRucTIoN: (a) and (b) of this subdivi-sion shall be stated in terms of securitiesquantities only; (c) and (d) of this sub-division shall be stated in dollar amountsand securities quantities as appropriate; (e)and (f) of this subdivision shall be stated indollar amounts only.

(ii) Separate ledger accounts (or otherrecords) for each portfolio security,showing (as of trade dates) (a) thequantity and unit and aggregate pricefor each purchase, sale, receipt, and de-livery of securities and commodities forsuch accounts, and (b) all other debitsand credits for such accounts. Secu-rities positions and money balances insuch ledger accounts (or other records)shall be brought forward periodically butnot less frequently than at the end offiscal quarters. Any portfolio security,the salability of which is conditioned,shall be so noted. A memorandumrecord shall be available setting forth,with respect to each portfolio securityaccount, the amount and declaration, ex-dividend, and payment dates of eachdividend declared thereon.

(iii) Separate ledger accounts (orother records) for each broker-dealer,bank or other person with or throughwhich transactions in portfolio secu-rities are effected, showing each purchaseor sale of securities with or through suchpersons, including details as to the dateof the purchase or sale, the quantity andunit and aggregate price of such secu-rities, and the commissions or othercompensation paid to such persons.Purchases or sales effected during thesame day at the same price may be ag-gregated.

(iv) Separate ledger accounts (orother records), which may be main-tained by a transfer agent or registrar,showing for each shareholder of recordof the investment company the number

11993

11994

of shares of capital stock of the companyheld. In respect of share accumulationaccounts (arising from periodic invest-ment plans, dividend reinvestment plans,deposit of issued shares by the ownerthereof, etc.), details shall be availableas to the dates and number of shares ofeach accumulation, and except withrespect to already issued shares de-posited by the owner thereof, prices ofeach such accumulation.

(3) A securities record or ledger re-flecting, separately for each portfoliosecurity as of trade date all "long" and"short" positions carried by the invest-ment company for its own account andshowing the location of all securitieslong and the off-setting position to allsecurities short. The record called forby this paragraph shall not be requiredin circumstances under which all port-folio securities are maintained by a bankor banks or a member or members of anational securities exchange as cus-todian under a custody agreement or asagent for such custodian.

(4) Corporate charters, certificates ofincorporation or trust agreements, andby-laws, and minute books of stock-holders' and directors' or trustees' meet-ings; and minute books of directors' ortrustees' committee and advisory boardor advisory committee meetings.

(5) A record of each brokerage ordergiven by or in behalf of the investmentcompany for, or in connection with, thepurchase or sale of securities, whetherexecuted or unexecuted. Such recordshall include the name of the broker,the terms and conditions of the orderand of any modification or cancellationthereof, the time of entry or cancella-tion, the price at which executed, andthe time of receipt of report of execu-tion. The record shall indicate the nameof the person who placed the order inbehalf of the investment company.

(6) A record of all other portfoliopurchases or sales showing details com-parable to those prescribed in paragraph5 above.

(7) A record of all puts, calls,"spreads,straddles, and other optionis in whichthe investment companyv has any director indirect interest or which the invest-ment company has granted or guaran-teed; and a record of any contractualcommitments to purchase, sell, receive ordeliver securities or other property (butnot including open orders placed withbroker-dealers for the purchase or saleof securities, which may be cancelled bythe company on notices without penaltyor cost of any kind) ; containing, at least,an identification of the 'security, thenumber of units involved, the optionprice, the date of maturity, the date ofissuance, and the person to whom issued.

(8) A record of the proof of moneybalances in all ledger accounts (exceptshareholder accounts), in the form oftrial balances. Such trial balancesshall be prepared currently at least oncea month.

(9) A record for each fiscal quarter,which hall be completed within tendays after the end of such quarter, show-ing specifically the basis or bases uponvhich the allocation of orders for thepurchase and sale of portfolio securities


to named brokers or dealers and the di-vision of brokerage commissions or othercompensation on such purchase and saleorders among named persons weremade during such quarter. The recordshall indicate the consideration given to

i) sales of shares of the investmentcomnpany by brokers or dealers, (ii) thesupplying of services or benefits bybrokers or dealers to the investment com-pany, its investment adviser or princi-pal underwriter or any persons affili-ated therewith, and (iii) any otherconsiderations other than the technicalqualifications of the brokers and dealersas such. The record shall show the na-ture of the services or benefits madeavailable, and shall describe in detailthe application of any general or speci-fic formula or other determinant used inarriving at such allocation of'purchaseand sale orders and such division ofbrokerage commissions or other compen-sation. The record shall also includethe identities of the persons responsiblefor the determination of such allocationand such division of brokerage commis-sions or other compensation.

(10) A record in the form of an ap-propriate memorandum identifying theperson or persons, committees, or groupsauthorizing the purchase or sale of port-folio securities. Where an authoriza-tion is made by a committee or group, arecord shall be kept of the names of itsmembers who participated in the au-thorization. There shall be retained aspart of the record required by this para-graph any memorandum, recommenda-tion, or instruction supporting or au-thorizing the purchase or sale of port-folio securities. The requirements ofthis paragraph are applicable to the ex-tent they are not met by compliancewith the requirements of subparagraph(4) of this paragraph.

(11) Files of all advisory material re-ceived from the investment adviser, anyadvisory board or advisory committee,or any other bersonsfrom whom the in-vestment, company accepts investmentadvice, other than material which isfurnished solely through uniform publi-cations distributed generally.

(12) The term "other records" as usedin the expressions "journals (or otherrecords of original entry)" and "ledgeraccounts (or other records)" shall beconstrued to include, where appropriate,copies of voucher checks, confirmations,or similar documents which reflect theinformation required by the applicablerule or rules in appropriate sequence andin permanent form, including similarrecords developed by the use of auto-matic data processing systems.

c) Every underwriter, broker, ordealer which is a majority-owned sub-sidiary of a registered investment com-.pany shall maintain in the form pre-scribed therein such accounts, booksand other documents as are required tobe maintained by brokers and dealers byrule adopted under section 17 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.(d) Every depositor of any registered

investment company, and every princi-pal underwriter for any registered invest-ment company other than a closed-endinvestment company, shall maintain

such accounts, books and other docu-ments as are required to be maintainedby brokers and dealers by rule adoptedunder section 17 of the Securities Ex-change Act of 1934, to the extent suchrecords are necessary or appropriate torecord such person's transactions withsuch registered investment company.

(e) Every investment adviser whichis a majority-owned subsidiary of aregistered investment company shallmaintain in the form prescribed thereinsuch accounts, books and other docu-ments as are required to be 'naintainedby registered investment advisers by ruleadopted under Section 204 of the Invest-ment Advisers Act of 1940.

(f) Every investment adviser not amajority-owned subsidiary of a regis-tered investment company shall main-tain such accounts, books and otherdocuments as are required to be main-tained by registered investment advisersby rule adopted under section 204, of theInvestment Advisers Act of 1940, to theextent such records are necessary or ap-propriate to record such person's trans-actions with such registered investmentcompany.

§ 270.31a-2 Records to be preservedby registered investment companies,certain majority-owned subsidiariesthereof, and other persons havingtransactions with registered invest-went companies.

(a) Every registered investment com-pany shall:

(1) Preserve permanently, the first twoyears in, an easily accessible place, allbooks and records required to be madepursuant to subparagraphs (1) through(4) of § 270.31a-l(b) ;

(2) Preserve for a period not less thansix years from the end of the fiscal yearin which any transactions occurred, thefirst two years. in an easily accessibleplace, all books and records required tobe made pursuant to subparagraphs (5)through (12) of § 270.31a-1(b) and allvouchers, memoranda, correspondence,checkbooks, bank statements, cancelledchecks, cash reconciliations, cancelled-stock certificates, and all schedules evi-dencing and supporting each computa-tion of net asset value of the investmentcompany shares, and other documentsrequired to be maintained by § 270.31a-1(a) and not enumerated in § 270.31a-1(b).

(b) Every underwriter, broker, or deal-er which is a majority-owned subsidiaryof a registered investment company shallpreserve for the periods prescribed there-in such accounts, books and other docu-ments as are required to be preserved bybrokers and dealers by rule adopted un-der section 17 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934.

Cc) Every depositor of any registeredinvestment company, and every principalunderwriter for any registered invest-ment company other than a closed-endcompany, shall preserve for a period ofnot less than six years such accounts,books and other documents as are re-quired to be maintained by brokers anddealers by rule adopted under section 17of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,to the extent such records are necessaryor appropriate to record such person's


transactions with such registered invest-ment company.

(d) Every investment adviser which isa majority-owned subsidiary of a regis-tered investment company shall preservefor the periods prescribed therein suchaccounts, books and other documents asare required to be preserved by invest-ment advisers by rule adopted under sec-tion 204 of the Investment Advisers Actof 1940.

(e) Every investment adviser not amajority-owned subsidiary of a regis-tered investment company shall preservefor a period of not less than six yearssuch accounts, books and other docu-ments as are required to be maintainedby registered investment advisers by ruleadopted under section 204 of the Invest-ment Advisers Act of 1940, to the extentsuch records are necessary or appro-priate to record such person's transac-tions with such registered investmentcompany.

(f) Notwithstanding the provisions ofparagraphs (a) through (e) of thissection:

(1) After a record, book or other docu-ment has been preserved for three years,a photograph or film thereof may be sub-stituted therefor for the balance of therequired time; and

(2) Any record, book or other docu-ment may be destroyed in accordancewith a plan previously submitted to andapproved by the Commission. A planshall be deemed to have been approvedby the Commission if notice to the con-trary has not been received within 90days after submission of the plan to theCommission.

§ 270.31a-3 Records prepared or main-tained by others than person requiredto maintain and preserve them.

(a) If the records required to be main-tained and preserved pursuant to theprovisions of §§ 270.31a-1 and 270.31a-2are prepared or maintained by others onbehalf of the person required to maintainand preserve such ,records, the personrequired to maintain and preserve suchrecords shall obtain from such otherperson an agreement in writing to theeffect that such records are the propertyof the person required to maintain andpreserve such records and will be sur-rendered promptly on request.

(b) In cases where a bank or mem-ber of a national securities exchangeacts as custodian, transfer agent, ordividend disbursing agent, compliancewith this section shall be considered tohave been met if such bank or exchangemember agrees in writing to make anyrecords relating to such service avail-able upon request and to preserve for theperiods prescribed in § 270.31a-2 anysuch records as are required to be main-tained by § 270.31a-1.

(Secs. 31, 38a. 54 Stat. 838, 841, 15 U.S.C.80a-30, 80a-37)

By the Commission.

[SEAL] ORVAL L. DuBois,Secretary.-

NOVEMBER 28, 1962.[F.R. Doe. 62-12000; Piled, Dec., 4, 1962;

8:49 am.]

FEDERAL REGISTER

Title 21-FOOD AND DRUGSChapter I-Food and Drug Adminis-

tration, Department of Health, Edu-cation, and Welfare

SUBCHAPTER B-FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS

PART 121-FOOD ADDITIVES

Subpart D-Food Additives Permittedin Food for Human Consumption

SOnRITOL

The CommisSioner of Food and Drugs,having evaluated the data submitted ina petition filed by Atlas Chemical In-dustries, Inc., Wilmington 99, Delaware,and other relevant material, has con-cluded that § 121.1053 of the food addi-tive regulations should be amended as setforth below:

Sections 121.90 and 121.1053 imposeupon certain foods containing sorbitoland on market packages of sorbitol therequirement of warning labeling withreference to laxation daused by excessive

'ingestion of this sugar. Available in-formation indicates that the incidence oflaxation from such overindulgence is nomore common than the incidence oflaxation caused by certain other foodsugars and certain foods themselves. Ithas been concluded that the need in theinterest of the public health to requiresuch warning is insufficient to justifythe imposition of such regulatory controland that the burden upon the industryand the Government imposed by such re-quirement is unwarranted. The atten-tion of interested persons is also directedto § 121.90 which provides that the con-ditions of the extension of the effectivedate for sorbitol are no longer applicableupon publication of this order.

Therefore, pursuant to the provisionsof the act (sec. 409(c) (1), 72 Stat. 1786;21 U.S.C. 348(c) (1)), and under the au-thority delegated to the Commisisoner bythe Secretary of Health, Education, andWelfare (25 F.R. 8625), § 121.1053 of thefood additive regulations is amended toread as follows:

§ 121.1053 Sorbitol.

The food additive sorbitol may besafely used in food provided the amountused does not exceed that reasonably re-quired to accomplish the intended phys-ical or technical effect.

Any person who will be adversely af-fected by the foregoing order may at anytime within 30 days from the date of itspublication in the FEDERAL REGISTER filewith the Hearing Clerk, Department ofHealth, Education, and Welfare, Room5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW.,Washington 25, D.C., written objectionsthereto. Objections shall show whereinthe person filing will be adversely af-fected by the order and specify withparticularity the provisions of the orderdeemed objectionable and the groundsfor the objections. If a hearing is re-quested, the objections must state theissues for the hearing. A hearing will begranted if the objections are supportedby grounds legally sufficient to justify the'relief sought. Objections may be accom-panied by a memorandum or brief in

11995

support thereof. All documents shall befled in quintuplicate.

Effective date. This order shall beeffective on the date of its publication inthe FEDERAL REGISTER.

(See. 409(c) (1), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(c) ())

Dated: November 29, 1962.

GEo. P. LARRIcK,Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

[F-. Doc. 62-12014; iled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:50 a.m.]

Title 33-NAVIGATION ANDNAVIGABLE WATERS

Chapter Il-Corps of Engineers,Department of the Army

PART 203-BRIDGE REGULATIONS

Tillamook River, Oreg.Pursuant to the provisions of section

5 of the River and Harbor Act of Au-gust 18, 1894 (28 Stat. 362; 33 U.S.C.499), § 203.735 governing the operationof the highway bridge across TillamookRiver near Tillamook, Oregon, is herebyrevoked, effective upon publication inthe FEDERAL REGISTER, since the bridge,has been removed, as follows:§ 203.735 Tillamook River, Oregon;

bridge (highway). [Revoked][Regs., 19 November 1962, 285/111 (Tlla-mook River, Oregon)-ENGCW-ON](See. 5, 28 Stat. 362; 33 U.S.C. 499)

J. C. LAmERT,Major General, U.S. Army,

The Adjutant General.[F.R. Doc. 62-11975; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:45 am.]

Title 38-PENSIONS, BONUSES,AND VETERANS' RELIEF

Chapter' I-Veterans AdministrationPART 3-ADJUDICATION

Subpart A-Pension, Compensation,and Dependency and IndemnityCompensation

PRESUM TIVE WARTIME SERVICE CONNEC-TION FOR CHERoNIc oR TROPICAL DISEASE

In § 3.307, paragraph (a) is amendedto read as follows:§ 3.307 Presumptive wartime service

connection for chronic or tropicaldisease.

(a) General. When a chronic diseaselisted in § 3.309 (a), in the case of a vet-eran who served for 90 days or moreduring a period of war, becomes mani-fest to a degree of 10 percent or morewithin 1 year (Hansen's disease (leprosy)and tuberculosis within 3 years; multiplesclerosis within 7 years), from the dateof separation from service in a period ofwar or where service continued after thewar, within such period from the end of


the war, or when a tropical disease listedin § 3.309(b) becomes manifest to a de-gree of 10 percent or more within 1 yearfrom date of separation from service; orat a time when standard acceptedtreatises indicate that the incubationperiod thereof commenced during suchservice, it will be considered to havebeen incurred in such service eventhough there is no evidence of such dis-ease during the period of service. Theresultant disorders or diseases originat-ing because of therapy administered inconnection with tropical disease or as apreventative thereof, may also be serviceconnected. No conditions other thanthose referred to in this paragraph willbe considered chronic. (38 U.S.C. 312;Public Law 87-645.)

(72 Stat. 1114; 38 U.S.C. 210)

This regulation is effective Decem-ber 5, 1962.

[SEAL] W. J. DRIVER,Deputy Administrator.

[P.R. Doc. 62-12018; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:51 a.m.]

Title 41 - TELECOMMUNICATIONChapter I-Federal Communications

Commission

PART O-COMMISSIONORGANIZATION

Miscellaneous Amendments

At a session of the Federal Communi-cations Commission held at its officesin Washington, D.C., on the 28th dayof November 1962;

The Commission having under regu-lar review the organization and proce-dures of the Commision staff, and hav-ing under consideration a study of itsstaff organization and procedures madeby private management consultants, un-der contract with the Bureau of theBudget; and

It appearing that the actions orderedherein will contribute to the efficiencyand effectiveness of Commissioh admin-istration; and

It further appearing that the amend-ments herein adopted are issued pur-suant to authority contained in sections4(i), 5(b), and 303(r) of the Communi-cations Act of 1934, as amended; and

It further appearing that the amend-ments adopted herein pertain to Com-mission organization and hence that thenotice and effective date requirements ofsection 4 of the Administrative Proce-dure Act are inapplicable;

It is ordered, That the position of Ex-ecutive Officer and thQ Office of Ad-ministration are hereby abolished. It isfurther ordered that the position of Ex-ecutive Director is hereby establishedwith duties and responsibilities as setforth in the amendment adopted herein;and

It is further ordered, Effective Novem-ber 28, 1962, that sections 0.5, 0.91, 0.92,

and 0:93 of the Coirnmission's rules andregulations are amended as set forthbelow.(Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C.154. Interpret or apply sec. 303, 48 Stat.1082, as amended; sec. 5, 66 Stat. 713;,,47U.S.C. 303, 155)

Adopted: November 28, 1962.

Released: November 30, 1962.

FEDEIRAL COMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION,

BEN F. "WAPLE,Acting Secretary.

1. Section 0.5(f) is amended to readas follows:

§ 0.5 General description of Commis-sion organization.

(f) Executive Director.2. The undesignated center heading

preceding 0.91, and § 0.91, are amendedto read as follows:

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

§ 0.91 Functions and Responsibilities ofthe Executive Director.

The Executive Director is designatedby the Commission and is directly re-sponsible to the Commission under thesupervision of the Chairman. He has thefollowing duties and responsibilities:

(a) To provide sustained administra-tive leadership and coordination of staffactivities in carrying out the policies ofthe Commission, through overall super-vision and coordination, but not control,of such staff activities. In this capacity,he coordinates the activities of policymaking staff officers to assure that ade-quate information and recommendationsin important policy areas are expedi-tiously considered by the staff andbrought promptly to the attention ofthe Commission.

(b) To review with the Commissionand with heads of the. several bureausand offices, the program and proceduresof the Commission and to make recom-mendations thereon as may be necessaryto -administer the Communications Actmost effectively in the public interest.

Sp) To assist the Chairman in carry-ing out the administrative and executiveresponsibilities delegated to the Chair-man as the administrative head of theAgency and, in connection therewith, toplan, direct, coordinate, and manage theadministrative affairs of the Commissionwith respect to the functions of person-nel, budget, planning and administrativeservices.

(d) Under the general direction of theDefense Commissioner, and with the ad-vice and assistance of the heads of theseveral bureaus and offices, to coordinatethe defense activities (other than CON-ELRAD and radio-frequency manage-ment activities of the Chief Engineer)of the Commission and to keep the De-fense Commissioner informed as to sig-nificant developments in this area.

3. Section 0.92 is 'amended to read asfollows:

§ 0.92 Units under the Executive Direc-tor.

The Executive Director is charged withthe direction and control of the followingunits:

(a) Office of the Executive Director.(b) Budget and Fiscal Division.(c) Organization and Methods Divi-

sion.(d) Personnel Division.(e) Administrative Services Division.(f) Division of Defense Coordination.

4. That portion of § 0.93(a) precedingsubparagraph (1) is amended to read asfollows:

§ 0.93 Division of Defense Coordina-tion.

(a) The Division of Defense Coordina-tion is under the direction of the DefenseCoordinator, who is designated by theCommission to serve under the generaldirection of the Executive Director, andwho has the following duties and re-sponsibilities:[ .R. Doc. 62-12025; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:52 am.]

[Docket No. 13608]

PART 3-RADIO BROADCASTSERVICES

Table of - Assignments, TelevisionBroadcast Stations; Bakersfield,Calif.

The Commission having under con-sideration its report and order (FCC61-391) of March 22, 1961, releasedMarch 27, 1961, in the above-captionedproceeding, published in the FEDERALREGISTER on March 31, 1961 (26 F.R.2712); and

It appearing, that the Commission,among other things, ordered in the saidreport and order, that the televisionTable of Assignments, contained in§ 3.606 of the Commission's rules andregulations, be amended by substitutingUHF Channel 23- for Channel 10- asBakersfield, California, effective at 3:00a.m., e.s.t., December 1, 1962, concur-rently with the expiration of the out-standing license of Station KERO-TVon Channel 10, or at such earlier dateas Station KERO-TV may cease opera-tion on Channel 10- at Bakersfield,formal codification of the amendmentin the Rules and Regulations to be ac-complished by subsequent order; and

It further appearing that the saidamendment was adopted pursuant to au-thority contained in sections 4(j), 301,303 (c), (d), Cf) and (r), and 307 of theCommunications Act of 1934, as amend-ed, and in full compliance with the rulemaking and publication requirements ofsection 4 of the Administrative Proce-dure Act; and there remains only thecodification of the amendment in theCommission's rules and regulations;

it is therefore ordered, This 30th dayof November 1962, that, pursuant to au-thority of § 0.341(a) of the Commission'srules, the substitution of Channel 23-

11996

Wednesday, December 5, 1962 FEDERAL REGISTER 11997

for Channel 10- at Bakersfield, effectiveDecember 1, 1962, 3:00 am., e.s.t., ishereby codified under the Bakersfieldlisting in § 3.606 of the Commission'srules and regulations, and the Bakers-,field listing is revised to read as follows:

city Channel No.Bakersfield, Calif-_ 17, 23-, 29, *39+, 51-

(Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C.154. Interpret or apply secs. 301, 303, 307,48 Stat. 1061, 1082, 1083; 47 U.S.C. 301, 303,307)


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION,

[SEAL] BEN F. WAPLE,Acting Secretary.

[P.R. Doc. 62-12026; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:52 axm]

Proposed Rule MakingDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[ 7 CFR Part 959 ]ONIONS GROWN IN SOUTH TEXAS

Handling of Culls; ProposedAmendment

Notice is hereby given that the Secre-tary of Agriculture is considering theapproval of an amendment to the exist-ing rules and regulations, as hereinafterset forth, which was recommended'bythe South Texas Onion Committee, es-tablished pursuant- to Marketing Agree-ment No. 143 and Order No. 959, bothas amended (7 CFR Part 959), regulat-ing the handling of onions grown indesignated counties of South Texas.This program is effective under the Agri-cultural Marketing Agreement Act-of1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674).

Consideration will be given to anydata, views, or arguments pertainingthereto which are filed with the Director,Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricul-

-tural Marketing Service, United StatesDepartment of Agriculture, Washington25, D.C., not later than 10 days followingpublication of this notice-in the FEDERALREGISTER.

The proposed amendment would deletepresent § 959.126, "Handling of culls,"and substitute in lieu thereof a new§ 959.126 to read as follows:§ 959.126 -Handling of culls.

(a) The handling of culls, i.e., onionswhich fail to meet the grade, size 'andquality requirements established under§ 959.52(b) of this part, is prohibited,unless such onions are:

(1) Mechanically mutilated at thepacking shed rendering them unsuitablefor fresh market;

(2) Handled for special purpose out-lets approved under § 959.53 of this part;or

(3) Handled for canning or freezing.(b) As a safeguard against culls en-

tering fresh market channels each han-dler of culls under paragraph (a) (2) or(3) of this section shall apply for andobtain a certificate from the cofiimit-tee which shall require the handler tofurnish such reports or other informa-tion as the committee may request.

Dated: November 30,'1962.PAUL A. NIcHoLsoN,

Deputy Director, Fruit andVegetable Division, Agricul-'tural Marketing Service.

[F.R. Doc. 62-12020; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8.51 an.]

[7 CFR Part 959 ]ONIONS GROWN IN SOUTH TEXAS

Proposed Limitation of ShipmentsNotice is hereby given that the Sec-

retary of Agriculture is considering is-11b98

suance of the limitation of shipmentsregulation, hereinafter set forth, whichwas recommended by, the South TexasOnion Committee, established pursuantto Marketing Agreement No. 143 andOrder No. 959 (7 CFR Part 959), bothas amended, regulating the handling-ofonions grown in designated counties inSouth Texas. This -program is effectiveunder the Agricultural MarketingAgreement Act of 1937, as amended (7U.S.C. 601-674).

Consideration will bre given to anydata, Views, or arguments pertainingthereto which are filed with the Direc-tor, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agri-cultural Marketing Service, UnitedStates Department of Agriculture,Washington 25, D.C., not later than 10days following publication of this noticein the FEDERAL REGISTER. The proposalsare as follows:

§ 959.303 Limitation of shipments.

During the period from February 4,1963, through June 30, 1963, no personmay package or load onions on Sun-days, or handle any lot of onions grownin the production area, except red onions,nless such onions meet the grade re-quirements'of paragraph (a) of this sec-tion, one of the applicable size require-ments of paragraph (b) of this section,the container requirements of para-graph (c) of this section, and the in-spection requirements of paragraph (f)of this section, or unless such onions arehandled in accordance with the provi-sions of paragraphs (d) or (e) of thissection.

(a) Minimum grade. Not to exceed20 percent defects of U.S. No. 1 grade.In percentage grade lots, tolerances forserious damage shall not exceed 10 per-cent including not more than 2 percent

\decay. Double the lot tolerance shall bepermitted in individual packages in per-centage grade lots. Application of tol-erances in U.S. Grade Standards shallapply to in-grade lots.

(b) Size requirements. (1) "Small"'-1 to 2/4 inches in diameter, and limitedto whites only;

(2) "Repacker"'--13 to 3 inches indiameter, with 60 percent, or more 2inches in diameter or larger;

(3) 2 to 3 1/2 inches in diameter; or(4) "Jumbo'-3 inches or larger in

diameter.-(c) Container requirements. (1) 25

pound bags, with not to exceed in anylot an average net weight of 2 7Y2 poundsper bag, and with outside dimensions notlarger than 29 inches 'by 31 inches; or

(2) 50 pound bags, with not to.exceedin any lot an average net weight of 55pounis per bag, and with outside dimen-sions not larger than 33 inches by 3 8 1/2inches.

(3) These container requirementsshall not be applicable to onions sold toFederal Agencies.

(d) Minimum quantity exemption.Any handler miay handle, only as in-

dividual shipments and other than forresale, not more than' 100 pounds ofonions per day, in the aggregate, withoutregard to the requirements of this sec-tion or to the inspection and assessmentrequirements 6f this part.

(e) Special purpose shipments. (1)The requirements of paragraphs (a),(b) and (c) of this section, also the as-sessment and inspection requirementsof this part shall not be applicable toonions handled for the following specialpurposes:

Ci) Relief or charity; and(ii) Experimental purposes.(2) Each handler, prior to handling

onions pursuant to the preceding sub-paragraph and pursuant to §§ 959.120-959.125, shall apply for and obtain a Cer-tificate of Privilege from the Committeewhich shall require-,the handler to fur-nish such reports and documents as theCommittee may require showing thatthe onions were handled for the purposespecified in the Cprtificate of Privilege.

(f) Inspection. (1) During the effec-tive period hereof, no handler may han-dle any onions; except pursuant to para-graphs (d) or (e) of this section, unlessan appropriate inspection certificate hasbeen issued with respect thereto.

(2) No handler shall transport orcause the transportation of any ship-ment of onions by motor vehicle forwhich an inspection certificate is re-quired unless each such shipment is ac-companied by a copy of the inspectioncertificate applicable thereto or by docu-mentary evidence on forms furnished bythe Committee identifying truck lots towhich a valid inspection certificate isapplicable and a copy of such inspectioncertificate or Committee document, uponrequest, is surrendered to authoritiesdesignated'by the Committee. '

(3) For .purpose of operation underthis part each inspection certificate orCommittee form required as evidence ofinspection is hereby determined to bevalid for a period not to exceed 72 hoursfollowing completion of inspection asshown on the certificate.

(g) Definitions. The term "U.S. No.1" shall have the same meaning as setforth in the United States Standards forBermiuda-Granex-Grano' Type Onions

§§ 51.3195-51.3209 of this title), or inthe-United States Standards for Gradesof Onions C§.§ 51.2830-51.2850 of thistitle), whichever is applicable to the par-ticular variety. All other terms used inthis section shall have the same meaningas when used ,in Marketing AgreementNo. 143 and Marketing Order No. 959,

'both as amended (Part 959 of this title).(Sees. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 US.C.601-674)


PAUL A. NICHOLSON,Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg-

etable Division, AgriculturalMarketing Service.


Wednesday, December "5, 1962

Agricultural Stabilization andConservation Service

[7 CFR Parts 1004, 1010 ][Docket Nos. AO-160-A26, AO-276-A6i

MILK IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYL-VANIA, AND WILMINGTON, DELA-WARE, MARKETING AREAS

Notice of Hearing on ProposedAmendments to Tentative Market-ing Agreements and Orders; Cor-rection

In the notice of hearing on proposedamendments to the Philadelphia, Penn-sylvania, and Wilmington, Delaware,milk orders issued November 20, 1962(27 F-.1- 11673), delete the words "'CecilCounty, Maryland and" in ProposalNo. 3.

Signed at Washington, D.C., on No-vember 30, 1962.

H. C. FEDDERSEN,Acting Director, Milk Marketing

Orders Division, AgriculturalStabilization and Conserva-tion Service.

[P.R. Doc. 62-12022; Piled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:51 an.]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU-CATION, AND WELFARE

Food and Drug Administration[21 CFR Part 121 ]

FOOD ADDITIVESNotice of Filing of Petition

Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed-eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec.409(b) (5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(b) (5)), notice is given that a petition(FAP 764) has been filed by Pabst Brew-ing Company, 917 West Juneau Avenue,Milwaukee 1, Wisconsin, proposing theamendment of § 121.225 of the food ad-ditive regulations to provide for the safeuse of 70 milligrams per head per day ofbacitracin as a growth promotant incattle feed.

Dated: November 30, 1962.J. K. KIRK,

Assistant Commissionerof Food and Drugs.

[F.R. Doe. 62-12015; Piled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:50 aam.]

[21 CFII Part 121 ]FOOD ADDITIVES

Notice of Filing-of PetitionPursuant to the provisions of the Fed-

eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec.409(b) (5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(b) (5)), notice is given that a petition(PAP 975) has been fled by AmericanCyanamid Company, Post Office Box400, Princeton, New Jersey, proposingthe amendment of § 121.208 Chiortetra-cycline of the food additive regulationsto provide for the safe use of high-levelchlortetracycline in low-calcium chickenfeeds as follows:

No. 235-3

FEDERAL REGISTER

Grams Combined GramsPrincipal Ingredient per with- per Limitations Indications for use

I ton I ton

ChlortetracyclLne ----- 800-1200 - For chickens; not to be fed Aid in treatment of compll.to laying chickens; as ated chronic respiratorychlortetracycline hydro- disease (severe air-sac dis-chloride; In low-calcium ease); aid in reducing con-feed containing 0.4% to demnations; aid in reduc-0.55% dietary calcium; Ing mortality from compli.not to be fed for more cated chronic respiratorythan 6 days; do sot feed disease; aid in maintainingwithin24hoursofslugh- weight gains in chickenter. exposed to complicated

chronic respiratory disease.


J. K. KnuK,Assistant Commissioner

of Food and Drugs.

[P.R. Doe. 62-12016; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:51 am.]

FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY[ 14 CFR Parts 3, 4b I

[Reg. Docket No. 1206; Draft Release No.62-23]

AIRPLANE AIRWORTHINESS; NOR-.. MAL, UTILITY, ACROBATIC, AND

TRANSPORT CATEGORIES

Notice of Withdrawal of ProposedRule Making

The Flight Standards Service of theFederal Aviation Agency has had underconsideration a proposal to amend Parts3 and 4b of the Civil Air Regulations toprovide minimum airworthiness stand-ards for small high-performance air-planes. The reasons therefor were setforth in the explanatory statement of anotice of proposed rule making whichwas published in the FEDERAL REGISTER(27 FR. 4789) and circulated to thepublic as Civil Air Regulations Draft Re-lease 62-23, dated May 14, 1962.

Upon further consideration and in thelight of the comments received in re-sponse to the draft release, it now ap-pears that the standards set forth in theproposal are unnecessarily restrictiveand should not be adopted. Instead oflimiting the applicability of Part 3 asproposed in the draft release, the FlightStandards Service now has under con-sideration the possibility of expandingthe applicability of Part 3 to include air-planes of larger size and higher per-formance. The objective of this expan-sion of the Part will be to obtain asystem-worthy airplane for the environ-ment in which it is to be operated, with-out penalizing other airplanes which areto be operated in a less severe environ-ment. This approach, of course, re-quires further study of each of the areasof Part 3 to determine what additionalprovisions are necessary to provide theminimum airworthiness requirements forsuch airplanes. When a new approachhas been sufficiently developed, it will beset forth in a notice of proposed rulemaking which will afford all interestedpersons an opportunity to commentthereon.

In consideration of the foregoing, thenotice of proposed rule making (27 F.R.

4789) and circuated as Draft ReleaseNo. 62-:923, dated May 14, 1962, is herebywithdrawn.(Sec. 313(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of1958 (72 Stai. 752; 49 U.S.C. 1354))

Issued in Washington, D.C., on No-vember 29,1962. G. S. MOOR%,

Acting Director,Flight Standards Service.

[P.R. Doe. 62-11977; Piled, Dec. 4, 1962;8:45 am.1

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION

[Docket No. 14867; FCC 62-1247]

[47 CFR Part 1]

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCE-DURE; CONTENT OF APPLICATION

Notice of Proposed Rule Making

1. Notice is hereby given of proposedrule making in the above entitedmatter.

2. A number of cases have recentlycome before the Commission which indi-cate the need for clarification of ourrules in an important respect-namely,the necessity of keeping the Commissioninformed as to material changes in thestatus of an application. See, e.g.,Huntington-Montauk, FCC 62-968; Tide-water Teleradio, Inc., FCC 62-1246.

3. The Commission's rules now setforth the circumstances in which anapplication may be amended, either as amatter of right or upon a showing ofgood cause (see 47 CFR 1.311). But theydo not require the filing of an amend-ment or a request to amend to reflect amaterial change in the facts set forth inthe application. So long as the case isbefore the Commission or the courts,however, the applicant is in fact obli-gated to apprise the Commission of sig-nificant changes in circumstances whichmay affect its decision. See Flemmingv. FCC, 225 F. 2d 523 (1955), and South-

'Where the matter is before the Court, theCommission, upon being informed of a sig-nificant change or a request for amendment,could then apprise the Court, with a requestfor whatever action may be found to be ap-propriate. By requiring the filing of a re-quest to amend in the above circumstances,we are not in any way indicating whethersuch request will in fact be granted. Ourdetermination as to grant or denial would,of course, depend on the facts of the par-ticular case.

11999

PROPOSED RULE' MAKING

land Television Co. v. FCC, 266 F. 2d686, 687 (1959). It now seems appro-priate to add such a requirement to therules.

4. We propose to do so by adding sec-tion 1.304(c), as that section is set forthbelow. We believe the proposed sectionwill make it clear that the applicant isresponsible for the continuing accuracyand completeness of representationsmade to the CommAssion on matters ofdecisional significance, whether theyare made in the application and there-fore require an amendment, or are madein some other form.

5. The proposed rule is procedural innature and restates well establishedCommission policy; thus prior notice ofrule making is not required by law. Webelieve, however, that interested partiesmay be able to submit constructive sug-gestions and comments with respect tothe detailed provisions which such a ruleshould contain and the procedural impli-cations of the Commission's proposal.This notice is issued to afford them suchan opportunity.

6. Authority for adoption of the pro-posed rule is set forth in sections 4(i),303(r), and 309 of the CommunicationsAct of 1934, as amended.

7. Interested parties may submit com-ments on or before December 26, 1962.Reply comments will not be accepted.All relevant and timely comments will beconsidered by the Commission beforefinal action is taken in this proceeding.In reaching its decision in this proceed-ing, the Commission may also take intoaccount other relevant information be-fore it in addition to the specific com-ments invited by this notice.

8. In accordance with the provisionsof § 1.54 of the Commission's rules, anoriginal and 14 copies of all statements,briefs, or comments shall be furnishedthe Commission.

Adopted: November 28, 1962.

Released: November 30, 1962.FEDERA I COMUNICATIONS

COM MISSION,[SEALI BEN F. WAPLE,

Acting Secretary.

Section 1.304(c) is added to read asfollows:

§ 1.304 Contents of -application.

(c) The applicant is responsible forthe continuing accuracy and complete-ness of information furnished in a pend-ing application or in Commission pro-ceedings involving the pending applica-tion. Whenever it appears to anyapplicant that the information fur-nished in his pending application is nolonger accurate and complete in all ma-terial respects, he shall promptly amendor request the amendment of his appli-cation so as to furnish such additionalor corrected inforn~ation-as may be'ap-propriate. Whenever it appears to anyapplicant that there has been a materialchange as to any matter of decisionalsignificance in a Commission proceed-ing involving the pending application, heshall promptly submit a statement fur-nishing such additional or corrected in-

formation as may be appropriate. Thisstatement shall be served upon partiesof record in accordance with § 1.56.Where the matter is before any court-for review, requests to amend and state-ments shall in addition be served uponthe Commission's General Counsel. Forthe purposes of this paragraph, an ap-plication is "pending" before the Com-mission from the time an application isfiled with the Commission until an orderof the Commission granting or denyingit is no longer subject to reconsiderationby the Commission or to review, by anycourt.[P.R. Doc. 62-12023; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:51 a.m.]

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCECORPORATION

[12 CFR Part 334]

BANK SERVICE ARRANGEMENTS


The Board of Directors of the FederalDeposii Insurance Corporation is con-

sidering the adoption of a new Part 334to its ruleg and regulations (12 CFRPart 301 et seq.) pursuant to the BankService Corporation Act, Public Law 87-856, approved October 23, 1962 (76 Stat.1132).

The proposed Part 334 is designed toimplement section 5 of the aforemen-tioned Act, which requires that certainassurances be furnished to the Board ofDirectors in connection with arrange-ments for the performance of bank serv-ices for State insured nonmember banks.

The proposed Part 334 is as follows:

Sec.334.1 Authority and scope.334.2 Form of assurances.334.3 Time for furnishing assurances.334.4 Special situations.

§334.1 Authority and scope.

This part implements the provisionsof section 5 of the Bank Service Cor-poration Act, Public Law 87-856, ap-proved October 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1132),in the application thereof to arrange-ments for the performance of bankservices for insured State nonmemberbanks. Under that section of the Act,no insured State nonmember bank maycause to be performed, by contract orotherwise, any bank services for itself,whether on or off its premises, unlessassurances satisfactory to the Board ofDirectors of the Federal Deposit Insur-ance Corporation are furnished to theBoard of Directors by both the bank andthe party performing such services thatthe performance thereof will be subject_to regulation and examination by theBoard of Directors to the same extent asif such services were being performed bythe bank itself on its own premises.Such assurances are required by the Actwhether the bank services are performedby bank service corporations in whichthe Act authorizes banks to invest, or byothers. Under section 1(b) of the Act,the term "bank services" means servicessuch as check and deposit sorting and

posting, computation and posting of in-terest and other credits and charges,preparation and mailing of checks, state-ments, notices, and similar items, orother clerical, bookkeeping, accounting,statistical, or similar functions per-formed for a bank.

§ 334.2 Form of assurances.

Unless additional or different assur-ances-.are considered necessary by theBoard of Directors in specific cases, theassurances referred to in §'334.1 of thispart will be deemed to be satisfactory tothe Board of Directors if submitted inthe form of a joint letter signed by a dulyauthorized, officer of the insured Statenonmember bank and by the party (or aduly authorized officer or representativeof such party) performing the bankservices for the bank, stating, in sub-stance, that the bank and the party per-forming such services have entered intoan agreement that the performance ofthe services will be subject to regula-tion and examination by the Board ofDirectors to the same extent as if suchservices were being performed by thebank itself on its own premises; exceptthat, in lieu, of a joint letter, the bankand the party performing the bank serv-ices for the bank may submit separateletters which otherwise comply with thissection. All such letters of assurancesshall be addressed to the SupervisingExaminer of the Corporation of the Fed-eral Deposit Insurance Corporation dis-trict in which the insured State non-member bank has its main office.

§ 334.3 Time for furnishing assurances.

As to arrangement for the perform-ance of bank services entered into orrenewed after the effective date of thispart, assurances complying with § 334.2shall be furnished prior to the perform-ance of any services for the bank underthe bank service arrangement. With re-spect to any bank service arrangemententered into prior to the effective dateof this part, such assurances shall befurnished within 30 days after the effec-tive date of this part, unless a letter ofassurances covering such bank servicearrangement has been furnished previ-ously pursuant to the Board of Direc-tors' "Statement for State NonmemberInsured Banks on the 'Bank Service Cor-poration Act'" issued October 24, 1962.

§ 334.4 Special situations.

Assurances complying with § 334.2need not be furnished in connection witharrangements for bank services whichare immediately necessary because ofemergency conditions or situations, orare required for short periods of timedue to unusually heavy work demands,if the insured State nonmember bankpromptly advises the Supervising Exam-iner of the Corporation of its district ofthe circumstances involved and of thelength of time during which any of thebank's books or records or any binkingmedia will be removed from the banl'spremises and of the location thereof, andunless the bank is advised by the Super-vising Examiner that such assurancesmust be furnished. Unless specificallyrequested by the Board of Directors, as-surances complying with § 334.2 need not

12000


be furnished in connection with any ar-rangement by a State nonmember bankfor the performance of legal services or'administrative services, such as trans-portation or guard services.

This notice is published pursuant tosection 4 of the Administrative Proce-dure Act and Part 302 of the FederalDeposit Insurance Corporation's rulesand regulations (12 CFR Part 302).

To aid in the consideration of the fore-going matter, the Board of Directors willbe glad to receive from interested personsany relevant data, views, or arguments.Although such material may be sent di-rectly to the Secretary, Federal DepositInsurance Corporation, Washington 25,D.C., it is preferable that it be sent tothe Supervising Examiner of the district,who will forward it to the Board of Di-rectors to be considered. All such mate-rial should be submitted in writing tobe received not later than 30 days fromthe date of publication of this notice inthe FEDERAL REGISTER.

Dated this 30th day of November 1962.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCECORPORATION,

[SEAL] E. F. DOWNEY,Secretary.

[F-R. Doc. 62-12005; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 am.]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM[12 CFR Part 219 ]

[Reg. SI

BANK SERVICE ARRANGEMENTS


The Board of Governors of the :Fed-eral Reserve System is considering theadoption of a new Part 219 (RegulationS) pursuant to the Bank Service Cor-poration. Act, Public Law 87-856, ap-proved October 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1132).

The proposed Part 219 is designed toimplement section 5 of the aforemen-tioned Act which requires that certeinassurances be furnished to the Board inconnection with arrangements for theperformance of bank services for Statemember banks of the Federal ReserveSystem.

The proposed Part 219 is as follows:Sec.219.1 Authority and scope.219.2 Form of assurances.219.3 Time for furnishing assurances.219.4 -Special situations.

§ 219.1 Authority and scope.

This part implements the provisionsof section 5 of the Bank Service Corpora-tion Act, Public Law 87-856, approvedOctober 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1132), in theapplication thereof to arrangements forthe performance of bank services forState banks that are members of theFederal Reserve System. Under-thatsection of the Act, no State memberbank may cause to be performed, bycontract or otherwise, any bank servicesfor itself, .whether on or off its premises,unless assurances satisfactory to theBoard of Governors of the Federal Re-

FEDERAL REGISTER

serve System are furnished to the Boardby both the bank and the party perform-ing such services that the performancethereof will be subject to regulation andexamination by the Board to the sameextent as if such services were being per-formed by the bank itself on its ownpremises. Such assurances are requiredby the Act whether the bank services areperformed by bank service corporationsin which the Act authorizes banks to in-vest, or by others. Under section 1(b)of the Act, the term "bank services"means services such as check and depositsorting and posting, computation andposting of interest and other credits andcharges, preparation and mailing ofchecks, statements, notices, and similaritems, or other clerical, bookkeel5ing, ac-counting, statistical, or similar func-tions performed for a bank.

§ 219.2 Form of assurances.

Unless additional or different assur-ances are considered necessary by theBoard in specific cases, the assurancesreferred to in § 219.1 of this part willbe deemed to be satisfactory to theBoard if submitted in the form of a jointletter signed by a duly authorized officerof the State member bank and by theparty (or a duly authorized officer orrepresentative of such party) perform-ing the bank services for-the bank, stat-ing, in substance, that the bank and theparty performing such services haveentered into an agreement that the per-formance of the services will be subjectto regulation and examination by theBoard to the same extent as if such serv-ices were being performed by the ]bankitself on its own premises; except that,in lieu of a joint letter, the bank and theparty performing the bank services forthe bank may submit separate letterswhich otherwise comply with this sec-tion. All such letters of assurances shallbe addressed to the Board of Governorsof the Federal Reserve System in care ofthe Federal Reserve Bank of the districtin which the State member bank has itsmain office.

§ 219.3 Time for furnishing assurances.

As to any arrangement for the per-formance of bank services entered intoor renewed after the effective date ofthis part, assurances complying with§ 219.2 shall be furnished prior to theperformance of any service for the bankunder the bank service arrangement.With respect to any bank service ar-rangement entered into prior to the ef-fective date of this part, such assurancesshall be furnished within 30 days afterthe effective date of this part, unless aletter of assurances covering such bankservice arrangement has been furnishedpreviously pursuant to- the Board's"Statement for State Member Banks onthe 'Bank Service Corporation Act'-"issued October 23, 1962 (Federal ReserveBulletin, November 1962, page 1428).

§ 219.4 Special situations.

Assurances complying with § 219.2need not be furnished in connection witharrangements for bank services whichare immediately necessary because ofemergency- conditions or situations or

12001

are required for short periods of timedue to unusually heavy work demands, ifthe State member bank promptly ad-vises the Federal Reserve Bank of itsdistrict of the circumstances involvedand of the length of time during whichany of the bank's books or records or anybanking media will be removed from thebank's premises and of the locationthereof, and, unless the bank is advisedby the Federal Reserve Bank that suchassurances must be furnished. Unlessspecifically requested by the Board, as-surances complying with § 219.2 neednot be furnished in connection with anyarrangement by a State member bankfor the performance of legal services oradministrative services, such as trans-portation or guard services.

This notice is published pursuant tosection 4 of the Administrative Proce-dure Act and the Rules of Procedure of

.the Board of Governors of the FederalReserve System (12 CFR 262.1).

To aid in the consideration of thismatter, the Board will be glad to receivefrom interested persons any relevantdata, views, or arguments. Althoughsuch material may be sent directly tothe Board, it is preferable that it besent to the Federal Reserve Bank of thedistrict which will forward it to theBoard to be considered. All such mate-rial should be submitted in writing tobe received not later than 30 days fromthe date of publication of this notice inthe FEDERAL REGISTER.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THEFEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM,

[SEAL] MERRITT SHERMAN,Secretary,

[F.R. Doe. 62-12031; Flued, Dec. 4, 1962;8:52 a.m.]

INTERSTATE COMMERCECOMMISSION

[49 CFR Part 170][Ex Parte No. MC-37 (Sub-No. 5)]

PUEBLO, COLO.

Proposed Definition of CommercialZone

NOvEmIBER 30, 1962.Petitioner: Denver Chicago Trucking

Company, Inc., Denver, Colo.Petitioner's attorneys: David Axelrod,

39 South La Salle Street, Chicago 3, Ill.By petition filed July 12, 1962, peti-

tioner seeks a specific definition of thePueblo, Colo., commercial zone so as toinclude the Pueblo Memorial Airport.The commercial zone of Pueblo is pres-ently defined by reference to the popu-lation-mileage formula promulgated inthe original report in Commercial Zonesand Terminal Areas, 46 M.C.C. 665, 49CFR 170.16. Therein it was establishedthat the commercial zone of a munici-pality such as Pueblo, having a popula-

-tion of 25,000 but less than 100,000,should consist of the municipality itself,all municipalities which are contiguousto the base municipality, all unincor-porated areas within 4 miles of its cor-

PROPOSED RULE MAKING

porate limits and all of any othermunicipality any part of which is within4 -miles of the corporate limits of thebase municipality. The petition allegesthat only part of the airport is within 4miles of Pueblo's corporate limits, andthat the commercial zone 'exemptionshould be applicable to all facilitieswhich are available within the airportboundary.

'This proceeding is assigned for oralhearing on January 7, 1963, before Ex-aminer Dallas B. Russell at the DenverHilton, Denver, Colo.

Notice to the general public 'of thematter herein under consideration willbe given by depositing a copy of thisnotice in the office of the Secretary ofthe Commission for public inspectionand by filing a copy thereof with theDirector, Office of the Federal Register.

By the Commission, Division 1.

[SEAL] HAROLD D. McCoy,Secretary.

[F.R. Doe. 62-12009; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:50 axm.]

12002

NoticesDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Alien Property

DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN TRADE-MARKS VESTED DURING WORLDWAR II

Notice with respect to certain trade-marks which, at the date of vesting wereowned by persons who were resident inor had their sole or primary seat in thearea of Germany now in the Soviet Zoneof Occupation or in the Soviet sector ofBerlin or in German territory underprovisional Soviet or Polish administra-tion.

Section 42 (d) of the Trading with theEnemy Act, as amended by Public Law87-861, 87th Congress, approved October23, 1962, provides:

(d) The Attorney General shallwithin forty-five days after the date ofenactment of this section publish in theFEDERAL REGISTER a list of trademarkswhich at the date of vesting in the AlienProperty Custodian or Attorney Generalwere owned by persons who were resi-dent in or had their sole or primary seatin the area of Germany now in the SovietZone of Occupation or in the -Sovietsector of Berlin or in German territoryunder provisional Soviet or Polish ad-ministration. Notwithstanding theprovisions of subsection (b) of this sec-tion, the effective date of divestment ofthe trademarks so listed and publishedin the FEDERAL REGISTER shall be the'dateof publication in the FEDEAL REGISTERby the Secretary of State of a certifica-tion identifying the cases in which anequivalent trademark has been regis-tered in the Federal Republic of Ger-many for a person residing or having itssole or primary seat in the Federal Re-public of Germany or in the western sec-tors of Berlin. In those cases of anequivalent trademark certified by theSecretary of State, the person regis-tered by the Federal Republic of Ger-many as owner of such equivalent trade-mark shall succeed to the ownership ofthe divested trademark in the UnitedStates.Notice as required by section 42(d) ishereby given with respect to the follow-ing trademarks:26480 176288 227284 28787326481 178303 227285 29370226482 191633 227286 29629126483 193554 227287 29762426484 197286 227288 30758826485 202684 243158 30921726486 204168 243236 31022726487 204592 261666 31023626488 223396 262049 31297088938 227275 262088 314070160373 227276 262332 316882160374 227277 262333 323118160410 227278 264475 323929160544 227279 267711 330379160645 227280 267808 330380161437 227281 268713 330381161617 227282 269797 333696161656' 227283 286060 ' 396280

338303 343764 352143 377133340752 345398 352708 392716343030 346260 362050 392746343122 350114 374370 401860343763

Rights and interests of Carl Zeiss,Jena and Carl Ikon, A G. Dresddn, intrademarks of Carl Zeiss, Inc., vestedpursuant to vesting order 19243.

Executed at Washington, D.C,, on No-vember 29, 1962.

For the Attorney General.

[SEAL] JOSEPH D. GUILFOYLE,Acting Director,

Office of Alien Property.[F.Rh. Doc. 62-11972; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:45 am.]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBureau of Land Management

[Group 299]

ARIZONA

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey andOrder Providing for Opening ofPublic Lands

NOVEIMBER 27, 1962.1. Plat of survey of the lands described

below will be officially filed in the LandOffice, Phoenix, Arizona, effective Jan-uary 2, 1963, at 10 am.:

GLA AND SALT RIVEiR mlERIDtA, ARIZONA

T. 6 S., R. 29 E.,Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, SW/ 4 NE4,

S/2 T T, WYSE/t, SW ;Sec. 4, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, SN/2 W/2 , S/ 2 ;Sec. 5, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, S!/2N/ 2 , S/;Sec. 6, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, SEY4NW/ 4 ,

S 2 NEI/4 , E ASW , SE ;Sec. 7, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, E/ 2W%, E 2 ;See. 8;Sec. 9;Sec. 10;Sec. 11;Sec. 12, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, W 2NE4, W 2;Sec. 13, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, SE/ 4 , W/ 2 ;Sec. 14;Sec. 15;Sec. 17;Sec. 18, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, E/ 2 W/ 2 , E1/2 ;Sec. 19, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, E/W/2 , EVA;Sec. 20;Sec. 21;Sec. 22;Sec. 23;Sec. 24;See. 25;Sec. 26;Sec. 27;Sec. 28;Sec. 29;Sec. 30, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, EW1/2 , EV2;Sec. 31, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, E/sWI/2, E/ 2 ;Sec. 32;Sec. 33;Sec. 34;Sec. 35;Sec. 36.

.The areas described aggregate 21,049.74acres.

2. The topography is principally moun-tainous, and the soils are very shallow,being gravelly and rocky.

3. The SWANE/ 4 , SEY4NW4, NEY4SWY4, SEYSW , lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,sec. 6, NE NW , and-lot 1 sec. 7 werewithdrawn pursuant to an applicationfor a preliminary permit fied Septem-ber 2, 1927, by Arizona Edison Company,pursuant to section 24 of the FederalPower Act for Power Project 837. Memo-randum of November 2, 1962, interpretedthe project as embracing these lands.The SEYANW/4,NE SW 4 , lots 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, sec. 6 and lots 1 and 2 sec. 7were withdrawn by Departmental Orderof February 1, 1917, as Water PowerDesignation No. 4, Arizona No. 1. Memo-randum of November 2, 1962, interpretedWater Power Designation No. 4, ArizonaNo. 1 to embrace these lands. The SE/4NWY4 , NEY4SWY4, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,sec. 6, and lots 1 and 2 sec. 7 were with-drawn by Executive Order of July 2,1910, creating Power Site Reservoir No.83. Memorandum of November 2, 1962,interpreted Power Site Reserve No. 83to embrace these lands.

4. The NWY4, WIsSW'A sec. 6, andthe NW'/4 NW/ 4 sec. 7 are embraced inApplication for Withdrawal Arizona030451 of the United States Army, Corpsof Engineers, for a dam and reservoir.

5. All rights of the State of Arizonato sections 32 and 36 have been conveyedto the United States.

6. The following described lands areopen to application, location, selectionand petition as outlined in. paragraph 7below. No application for these landswill be allowed under the honiestead,desert land, small tragt, or any othernonmineral public land law, unless thelands have already been classified uponconsideration of an application. Anyapplication that is filed will be consid-ered on its merits. The lands will notbe subject to occupancy or dispositionuntil they have been classified:

T. 6 S., R. 29 E.,Sec. 1, lots 1, 2,3, 4, 5,-6, 7, SW%/NE/, Sl

NW , W/2SE4, SW1/;Sec. 4, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, S./NA, S1/;.gee. 5, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, S N I/, SY2;Sec. 6, SEKNE/ 4 , SE/4:Sec. 7, lots 3, 4, E1 SW%, SE NW/ 4 , E/2.;Sec. 8;Sec. 9;Sec. 10;Sec. 11;Sec. 12, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, W/NE/4 , W1/2 ;Sec. 13, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, SE/ 4 , W/ 2 ;Sec. 14;Sec. 15;Sec. 17;Sec. 18, lots 1, 2, 3,4, E/2 W'/ 2 , E/2 ;Sec. 19, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, El/2W/, EVA;Sec. 20;Sec. 21;Sec. 22;Sec. 23;Sec. 24;Sec. 25;Sec. 26;Sec. 27;

12003

I .

12004 NOTICES

Sec. 28;Sec. 29;Sec. 30, lots 1, 2,3,4, EVW/ 2 , E1/2 ;Sec. 31, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, E 2W , EY2;Sec. 32;Sec. 33;Sec. 34;Sec. 35;See. 36.

The areas described aggregate 20,-509.08 acres.

7. Subject to any existing valid rightsand the requirements of applicable law,the lands described in paragraph 6 here-of, are hereby opened to filing applica-tions, selections, and locations in accord-ance with the following:

a. Applications and selections underthe nonmineral public land laws may bepresented to the Manager mentioned be-low, beginning on the date of this order.Such applications, selections, and offerswill be considered asjfiled on the hourand respective dates shown for the vari-ous classes enumerated in the followingparagraphs:

(1) Applications by persons havingprior existing valid settlement rights,preference rights conferred by existinglaws, or equitable claims subject toallowance and . confirmation will beadjudicated on the facts presented insupport of each claim or right. All ap-plications presented by persons otherthan those referred to in this paragraphwill be subject to the. applications andclaims Mentioned in this paragraph.

(2) All valid applications and selec-tions under the nonmineral public landlaws presented prior to 10 a.m. on Janu-ary, 2, 1962, will be considered assimultaneously filed at that hour.Rights under such applications and selec-tions and offers filed after that hour willbe governed by the time of filing.

8. Persons claiming preference rightsbased upon valid settlement, statutorypreference, or equitable claims must en-close properly corroborated statements insupport of their applications, settingforth all'facts relevant to their claims.Detailed rules and regulations govern-ing applications which may be filed pur-suant to this notice can be found in Title43 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Roy T. HELMANDOLLAR,Manager.

[F-R. Doc. 62-12013; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:50 am.]

CALIFORNIA

Notice of Proposed Withdrawal andReservation of Lands and PartialTermination Thereof

NOVEMBER 26, 1962.The United States Department of Ag-

riculture has filed an application, SerialNumber Sacramento 050595, for thewithdrawal of the, lands described be-low, from prospecting, location, entry,and purchase under the mining laws,subject to existing valid claims.

The applicant desires the land to pro-tect public recreation areas. For aperiod of 30 days from the date of pub-lication of this notice, all persons whowish to submit comments, suggestions,or objections in connection with the pro-

posed withdrawal may present theirviews in writing to the undersigned offi-cer of the Bureau of Land Management,Department of the Interior, Room 4201,U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building,650 Capitol Avenue, Sacramento 14,California.

If circumstances warrant it, a publichearing will be held' at a convenient timeand place, which will be announced.

The determination of the Secretary onthe application will be published in theFEDERAL REGISTER. A separate -noticewill be sent to each interested party ofrecord.

The lands involved in the applicationare:-,

MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, CALIFORNIA

TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST

Schoolhouse Creek

T. 18 N., R. 7 E.,Sec. 13: Lots 3 and 4.

T. 18 N., R. 8 E.,See. 19: Lot 1, NEV4 NW•/4 .

Celestial Valley

T. 18 N., 1. 8 E.,Sec. 22: N/ 2SWASW/ 4 NE/ 4 , SW/ 4 SW/ 4

SWI/ANEI, SE3/4 SEY4 NW 4 , NEy 4SW .

Oregon Creek

T. 18 N., R. 8 E.,Sec. 28:' SW ASW ASEY4NE,/4 , Wy2 NE/4

SE/4 , EVNWY4SE 4 . N N 2 NW/ 4 SESE/4.

Little Willow Creek

T. 18 N., R. 8 E.,See. 28: E/NE24NW/ 4 , SEI/4NW/ 4 , SE/4

SW 4 NWY4 , NIY2NW'/SW1.,

Freeman's Crossing

T. 18 N., R. 8 E,Sec. 28: SW14 SW/SE4.

Frog Hollow

T. 19 N., R. 8 E.,Sec. 25: N SW 4 SW/ 4 , SW ASW

1ASW/ 4 .

Ramshorn

T. 19 N., R. 9 E.,Sec. 1: N%/jE%.

Indian Valley No. 1

T. 19 N., R. 9 E.,Sec. 17: NE 4 SE 4 .

Indian Valley No. 2

T. 19 N., R. 9 E.,Sec. 8: SIASV2SW'A;Sec. 17: N/ 2 NW1/4 , SW ASW'A.

SerpentineT. 19 N., R. 10 E.,

See. 8: N/ 2NW .

Casa Loma

T. 15 N., R. 11 E.,Sec. 6: Lots 1, 2, 3, 12, N/ 2 of Lot 14.

Big ReservoirT. 15 N., R. 11 E.,

Sec. 20: S SE/4 ;Sec. 21: W'ASW/ 4 .

Chicken Hawk

T. 15 N., R. 11 E.,Sec. 34: SW/ 4 NW'ASEY4.

South Yuba No. IT. 17 N., R. 11 E.,- Sec. 6: SE/ 4SE SW , S/ 2SE4.

South Yuba No. 2T. 17 N., R. 11 E..

See. 8: NWY4NW , NI!/SW/4NWV4.

South Yuba No. 3

T. 17 N., R. 11 E.,Sec. 9: Lot2 (inENWI/4 ).

South Yuba No. 4T. 17 N., R. 1i E.,

Sec. 9: Lot 7, SEV/NE.

Middle Waters

T. 19 N., R. 11 E.,Sec. 12: S/NEI/4SE/, NEI/&SEI/SEIA.

Union FlatT. 20 N., R. 11 E.,

See. 28: SEZ/4 SW'/4 ;Sec. 33: N/ 2 NE/ 4 NW'/4 .

Shady Haven

T. 20 N., B. 11 E.,Sec.,31: SE N/ 2 Lot 8, Lot 11, SW/ 4 NW14

SE, NEV4 SW/SE./4 .

Fordyce Creek

T. 17,N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 2: SES/4 8E 4 ;Sec. 12: NWI/4 NW/4 .

Fuller LakeT. 17 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 8: SE/ 4SWY4, SW SEA.

Rucker LakeT. 17 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 8: NI/ZNEY, SWI/4 NE , NE/4NW4.

Eagle Lakes

T. 17 N., R. 12 E.,See. 12: SW/NE/ 4 , SE NW 4, W SE/4 .

Yuba River

T. 17 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 24: N NA.

McMurray Lake

T. 18 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 5: SW ANE .

Lindsay Creek

T. 18 N., B. 12 E.,See. 20: SS/ 2 N, NN/2 NSI/2 .

Jackson Creek

T. 18 N., B. 12 E.,See. 2: Lots 3 and 4, S/2 NW4.

Culbertson Lake

T. 18 N., B. 12 E.,-Sec. 22: NW /4 XW/ 4 .

Carr Lake

T. 18 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 28: SY2NW1/4 NW4, SW/ 4 NW/ 4 .

Feeley LakeT. 18 N., B. 12 E.,

Sec. 28: SWI/ 4 NEI/NEI/4, S1/2 NW ./4 NEY4 ,W ASE/NE,/4 t S'/2 NE NW 4 , SENW 4 .

Grouse RidgeT. 18 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 34: W/NE4.

Wetver LakeT. -19 N.,B. 12E.,

,Sec. 32: SW 4 (less NE/ 4 NEV4SWV),SW'SWW'/4 SEA.

Salmon Creek

T. 20 N., R. 12 E.,See. 3: WSE /E.

Packer Lake

T. 20 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 5: SN 4SW , S/2 SW/ 4 ;Sec. 8: X 2NANW4.

Tamarack LakesT. 20N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 8: SWV4.


Lower Sardine

T. 20 X., R. 12 E.,Sec. 10: NW

1/4 .

'Wild Plum

T. 20 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 26: S'ASW'/4;Sec. 27: S1/2 SE/4 (less Lot 77).

Snag Lake

T. 21N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 21: SE NEA,NE/SE A;Sec. 22: SW/NW,NW SWY4.

Lower Salmon Lake

T. 21 N.,R. 12 E.,Sec. 28: NV2SW , N/ 2NNW/4SW/ 4

SWI/4 , N /E/ 4 SWYSW%, N /SESW%;

Sec. 29: E/'E4 SEI/4 ,NE SESE .

Upper Salmon Lake

T. 21 N., R. 12 E.,See. 29: Wl/2 E%/NE/ 4 , W/ 2 NEV4 , EY/EV2

NWV4 .Baer Spring

T. 14 N., R. 13 E.,See. 18: NE!/NW/4.

Big Tree Grove

T. 14 N., R. 13 E.,Sec. 18: Lots 5,6,8, SE SW4;Sec. 19: Lot 1, NEV14 NWY4.

Tadpole

T. 15 N., R. 13 E.,See. 4: Lot 7 (less patented SyS1/2 W/ 2).

Flat Ravine

T. 15 N., R. 13 E.,See. 22: NEY4 NEI/4 , SW1/4NEY4, N/ 2SEV

NE./4.

Sterling Lake

T. 17 N., R. 13 E.,See. 10: Lot 1, NEY/NEY4, EN2SE/ 4 .

Woodchuck

T. 17 X., R. 13 E.,Sec. 16: SE .

Cold Springs

T. 17 N.,R. 13 E.,See. 25: NV2 N/ 2 except 23 acres of patented

land in NE/ 4NE4.

Hampshire Rocks

T. 17 N., R. 13 E.,See. 27: S/NEI/4 .

Big Benl

T. 17 N., n. 13 E.,See. 28: S/ 2NEY4 , N/ 2 SE4.

Big Bend -Home Tract

T. 17 N., R. 13 E.,Sec. 28: SW/4 .

Indian Springs

T. 17 N., R. 13 E.,Sec. 30: Lot 1, W 2 NEi 4, NENNWY4.

Tollhouse

T. 18 N., R. 13 E.,Sec. 16: NW/ 4NE .

Meadow Lake

T. 18 N., R. 13 E.,Sec. 22: NE/ 4 SW NE'/, W 2 SW/NE/4 ,

SE 4 SE/ 4NWY/4 , WW 2SE 4 .Baltimore Lake

T. 18 N., B. 13 E.,Sec. 28: WY2SW%.

Milton Bridge

T. 19 N., R. 13 E.,See. 18: SW/NE/ 4 , NWSEV/.

FEDERAL REGISTER

Lincoln CreekT. 20 N., R. 13 E.,

See. 9: S /NEYA,NNW 4.Dorsey Meadows

12005

I Sand Ridge LakeT. 18 N., R. 14 E.,

See. 34: SEl/SWV4,, SW!4SE4.Paradise Lake

T. 20 N., R. 13 E., T. 18 N., R. 14 E.,See. 10: SIANWy4, NW

1ASW'A, N/ 2 SW Sec. 26: EIANE/.

SWYb. PassSugar Bowl

T. 20 N., R. 13 E.,See. 11: S'/NW NW , NSW NWj/ .

Sierra Camp

T. 21 N., R. 13 E.,See. 31: SE/ 4 SEY4 SW/ 4 , S/ 2 SW1/4 SE/ 4 .

Chapman Creek

T. 21 N., 1. 13 E.,Sec. 32: S'/NW sSWY4 , SW

1ASW'/4 , SW/ 4

SE1/4 SW /.-. Talbot

T. 15 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 2: Lots 15, 16, 18, 19, 22.

Handy Camp

T. 15 N., R. 14 E.,See. 10: NE NE/4 ;See. 11: NWY4 NW/4.

Rice CreekT. 15 N., R. 14 E.,

Sec. 11: W/ 2SWY4SW'A.

AhartT. 15 N., R. 14 E.,

See. 21: SE NE/ 4 .

PoppyT. 15 N., B. 14 E.,

See. 28: SE /NWY4, NESW4.

McGuireT. 15 N., 1. 14 E.,

See. 31: W/ 2 Lot 1.

Onion Creek

T. 16 N., R. 14 E.,See. 2: SE4SE4.

Castle Peak

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 2: SE .

Round Valley

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 2: Lots 1 and 2, S34 NE/ 4 .

Magonigal Camp

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 6: Lot 4.

Lower Lola Montez Lake

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,See. 8: S NE/ 4 , W SE .

Upper Lola Montez Lake

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,.See. 8: NY2SW'A.

Beacon Hill

T. 17 N., B. 14 E.,Sec. 22: SE/ 4 NWIA, SW'/4 SWV4, EV2SW .

-Norden

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 24: Ny2NWSE/, SWV4SE/ 4 NW/4

SE , E 2SE 4 NW14SEV4, SE NW/4SW'/4 SEY4, ESW/SW/ 4SE , EY2 SWY4SE1/, E1/2 SE 4 .

Cascade Lakes

T. 17 N., R. 14 E.,Sec. 32: NW'/4 .

Crow's Nest

T. 17N., R. 14 E.,See. 36: W 2NE , EVNW%.

T. 17 N., R. 15 E.,See. 20: SE/ 4 SE/ 4 .

Summit

T. 17 N., R. 15 E.,Sec. 20: NW/ 4NE!/4 .

Mt. Judah

T. 17 N., B. 15 E.,Sec. 28: NEI/4 .

Mt. Lincoln Basin

T. 17 N., B. 15 E.,Sec. 28: NW

1!4 .

Win. KentT. 15 N., R. 16 E.,

See. 24: Tracts 37 and 38.- Deep Creek

T. 16 N., R. 16 E.,See. 4: E2 Lot 1, EY2 Lot 2, EY2SW .

Silver Creek

T. 16 N., R. 16 E.,Sec. 21: WY213 2 .

Red RockT. 16 N., R. 16 E.,

Sec. 22: W1/SW1/ 4 ;

Sec. 27: NW/ 4 NWV4 .

,Squaw Valley

T. 16 N., R. 16 E.,Sec. 32: NWI 4 NWI 4 .

Gravel Flat

T. 16 N., R. 16 E.,See. 34: W/WaW WANW , NW NW/4

sW!/4 .

Truckee River

T. 17 N., R. 16 E.,See. 21: WASE4.

The areas afore-described aggregateapproximately 9,100.87 acres more orless of Federal lands.

The applicant agency has cancelled itsapplication insofar as it involved theland described hereinafter. Therefore,pursuant to the regulations contained in43 CFR Part 295, such land is relieved ofthe segregative effect of the afore-men-tioned application at 10:00 aam., on De-cember 31, 1962.

The land terminated is:

MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIANs, CALIFORNIA

TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST

Mosquito Creek

T. 18. N., . 8 E.,See. 22: W/2N'EYSW/4NE/ 4 , NW SW

NE , NEN4 SE/4 NW!/4 , WAEY/NW1/4 ,N 2 W 2NW/ 4 , NWYANWYANW' .

King-Wolford Mill

T. 16 N., R. 10 E.,See. 10: EY2SE!/SE , EY2WY2 SE/ 4 SE/ 4 ;Sec. 11: W W'ASWV4 SW/.

White Cloud

T. 17 N., R. 10 E.,Sec. 22: SYANEYASEY4, NY2SEV4SE'A, SEN'4

SW! 4 .Big Reservoir

T. 15 X., B. 11 E.,Sec. 16: SW , WSEA;Sec. 20: NV2SE .

NOTICES

Fulda Creek

T. 16 N., R. 11 E.,Sec. 1: SE/ 4NE/, Ey2SE .

Steep HollowT. 17 N., R. 11E.,

Sec. 26: NEV4 NW4.

Shady HavenT. 20 N., R. 11 E.,

See. 31: That portion of N NW/ 4 SEembraced In patented Mineral Survey6150.

Fulda FlatT. 16 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 6: Lots 5, 6, 7, SE/ 4 NW/ 4 .

North ForkT. 16 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 8: NWI/ 4 NW/ 4 .

Onion ValleyT. 16 N., R. 12 E.,

See. 8: S 2 NW/ 4 , N2SW .

Tunnel MillsT. 16 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 17: SW'/4 NE'4, SE NW/ 4 , NWI/ 4 SE/ 4 .

Dawson Spring

T. 16 N., R. 12 E.,See. 27: SE NE/ 4 .

Bear ValleyT. 17 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 22: SW1

SW ;Sec. 28: SW NW .

Yuba Gap

T. 17 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 27: NWI/4 .

Feeley LakeT. 18 N., R. 12 E.,

Sec. 28: SW/ 4 NW .Lower Salmon Lake

T. 21 N., R. 12 E.,Sec. 28! The Lone Wolf Miniig Claim de-

scribed as S1/2 SW /4 SW/ 4 , Sy2NySWSW4, S 2N/ 2NW/ 4 SW1/4 SW/ 4 .

TadpoleT. 15 N., R. 13 E.,

Sec. 4: SS%.WV Lot 7.

McGuireT. 15 N., R. 13 E.,

Sec. 36: Lot 2 (or NE/ 4 NEI/4 ).T. 15 N., R. 14 E.,

Sec. 31: W'/2 Lot 2.

Cold SpringsT. 17 N., R. 13 E.,

Sec. 25: 23 acres of patented land inNEW4NE/ 4 .

CiscoT. 17 N., R. 13 E.,

Sec. 32: NE/ 4 NE/ 4 , NW'/ 4 NE/ 4 , NE/ 4NW .

LaneT. 17 N., R. 13 E.,

Sec. 33: NW/4.

Handy Camp

T. 15 N., R. 14E.,See 3: SEs 4 SE 4 .

Rice CreekT. 15 N., R. 14 E.,

Sec. 10: EV2 SEy4SE4;Sec. 15: NE/ 4 NE/ 4 .

Dolly CreekT. 15 N., R. 14 E.,

See. 15: SE 4 .

Ahart

T. 15 N., n. 14 E.,See. 15: S 2SW ;Sec. 21: NE/4 NE1/4 .

Onion CreekT. 16 N., R. 14 E.,

See. 1: SWy4SW .

Cedar PointT. 16 N., R. 14 E.,

See. 12: SWYASW .

Sagehen Experiment AreaT. 18 N., R. 16 E.,

Sec. 5: SE/ 4 NW/SW 4 , NV2SWySWy4,SWASW SW

1, W2NE /SW/ 4 ;

See. 6: SE /SWI4SWY4' Sy/SESW ,S1S/SE/4 ;

Sec. 7: N 2 N 2 NE/ 4 , NE/ 4 NE/ 4 NW 4 .

BrockVayT. 16 N., R. 17 E.,

Sec. 12: S1 S /2 .

Cedar FlatT. 16 N., R. 17 E.,

Sec. 28: Lot 1.WALTER E. BECK,

Manager, Land Office.Sacramento. -

[F.R. Doe. 62-11996; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 a.m.]

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION[Docket No. 50-144]

CAROLINAS VIRGINIA NUCLEARI POWER ASSOCIATES, INC.

Notice of Issuance of ProvisionalOperating License

Please take notice that, pursuant to anInitial Decision of the Hearing Examinerdat d October '25, 1962, the AtomicEnergy Commission has issued Provi-sional Operating License No. DPR--8 toCarolinas Virginia Nuclear Power As--sociates, Inc. for its nuclear reactor lo-cated at Parr, South Carolina.

The license authorizes the loading ofthe reactor, the conduct of tests and theoperation of the reactor up to and in-cluding steady-state power levels of 44.3megawatts thermal but specifies that thecore may not be loaded and operation ofthe facility may not begin until the Di-,rector of the Division of Licensing andRegulation has found that constructionof the facility has been completed in con-formity with Construction Permit No.CPPR-7 and the final hazards report.

The license will expire eighteenmonths after the date of its issuance,unless extended for good cause shown,or upon the earlier issuance of a super-seding operating license.

Copies of the Initial Decision and thelicense are available for public inspectionat the Commission's Public DocumentRoom, 1717 H Street NW., Washington25, D.C.

Dated at Germantown, Md., this 27thday of November 1962.

F or the Atomic Energy Commission.

R. LOWENSTEIN,Director, Division of

Licensing and Regulation.

[P.R. Doe. 62-11973; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:45 a.m.]

[Docket No. 115-51

LA-. CROSSE BOILING WATERREACTOR

Notice of Application for ConstructionAuthorization

Please take notice that the Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, 1205South 70th Street, West Allis, Wisconsin,pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of1954, as amended, on November 5, 1962,filed an application for authorization toconstruct the La Crosse Boiling WaterReactor at Genoa Station, Vernon Coun-ty, Wisconsin. The reactor will be adirect-cycle, forced-circulation boiling-water reactor. The proposed maximumsteady-state power level of the reactoris 165 megawatts, thermal.

The construction and operation of theLa Crosse Boiling Water Reactor is partof the Commission's Second Round Dem-onstration Reactor Program. Under theterms of the contracts with the Com-mission, Allis-Chalmers will supply thereactor; and the Dairyland Power Co-operative of La Crosse, Wisconsin Willfurnish the plant site and all equipment,facilities, and services necessary for thegeneration of electricity, except for thenuclear steam supply system, and willoperate the facility as a base-load planton its system for a period of ten years.

A copy of the application is availablefor public inspection at the Commission'sPublic Document Room, 1717 H StreetNW., Washington, D.C.

Dated at Germantown, Md., this 27thday of November 1962.

For the Atomic Energy Commission.ROBERT H. BRYAN,

Chief, Research and PowerReactor Safety Branch, Di-vision of Licensing andRegulation.

[F.R. Doc. 62-11974; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:45 a.m.]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREOffice of the Secretary

TEXASDesignation of Areas for Emergency

Loans

For the purpose of making emergencyloans pursuant to section 321(a) of Pub-lic Law 87-128 (7 U.S.C. 1961) it has beendetermined that in the hereinafter-named counties in the State of Texasnatural disasters have caused a need foragricultural credit not readily availablefrom commercial banks, cooperativelending agencies, or other responsiblesources.

TEXAS

Baylor. Kaufman.Dickens. Knox.Foard. Throckmorton.Hardeman. Wilbarger.Haskell.

Pursuant to the authority set forthabove, emergency loans will not be madein the above-named counties after June30, 1963, except to applicants who pre-

12006


viously received emergency or speciallivestock loan assistance and who canqualify under established policies andprocedures.

Done at Washington, D.C., this 30thday of November 1962.

ORVILLE L. FREEmm,Secretary.

[P.R. Doc. 62-12004; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 am.]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION

[Docket No. 14854; FCC 62M-1584]

DR. CHARLES H. HAGGARD ANDKENNETH R. ROGERS

Order Scheduling Hearing

In re application of Dr. Charles H.Haggard and Kenneth R. Rogers, Crys-tal City, Texas, Docket No. 14854, FileNo. BP-14502; for construction permit.

It is ordered, This 29th day of Novem-ber 1962, that Forest L. McClenning willpreside at the hearing in the above-entitled proceeding which is herebyscheduled to commence on January 22,1963, in Washington, D.C.

It is further ordered, That a prehear-ing conference in the proceeding will beconvened by the presiding officer at 9:00a.m., Friday, January 4, 1963.


FEDERAL COMIJUNICATIONSCOmMISSION,

[SEAL] BEN F. WAPLE,Acting Secretary.

[P.R. Doe. 62-12027; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:52 am.]

[Docket Nos. 14794. 14795; FCC 621M-1578]

SERVICE BROADCASTING CORP. ANDZ-B BROADCASTING CO.

Order Continuing Hearing

In re applications of Service Broad-casting Corporation, Kenosha, Wiscon-sin, Docket No. 14794, File No. BP-14786; Maurice J. Weber, Edwin H.Weinberg and Sidney J. Goldstein, d/bas Z-B Broadcasting Co., Zion, Illinois,Docket No. 14795, File No. BP-15458; forconstruction permits.

The Examiner having an oral requestconcurred in by all the parties in thisproceeding, seeking a postponement ofthe date presently set for hearing here-in; and good cause having been shown;

It is ordered, This 28th day of Novem-ber 1962, that the hearing herein pres-ently scheduled for February 11, 1963, ispostponed to February 25, 1963, at 10:00a.m. at the Commission's offices in Wash-ington, D.C.


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION,[SEAL] BEN F. WAPLE,

Acting Secretary.

] F. . Doe. 62-12029; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:52 am.]

No. 235----4

FEDERAL REGISTER

[Docket Nos. 14857-14862; FCC 62M-1587]

WELLERSBURG TV, INC., AND PEO-PLE'S COMMUNITY TELEVISIONASSOCIATION, INC.

Order Scheduling Hearing

In re applications of: Wellersburg TV,Inc., Wellersburg, Pennsylvania, DocketNo. 14857, File No. BPTTV-1174; Req:Input Channel 6, Johnstown, Pennsyl-vania (NBC); Output Channel 8 (toserve Wellersburg, Pennsylvania);Wellersburg TV, Inc., Wellersburg,Pennsylvania, Docket No. 14858, File No.BPTTV-1175; Req: Input Channel 7,Washington, D.C. (ABC); Output Chan-nel 11 (to serve Wellersburg, Pennsyl-vania); Wellersburg TV, Inc., Wellers-burg, Pennsylvania, Docket No. 14859,File No. BPTTV-1176; Req: InputChannel 9, Washington, D.C. (CBS);Output Channel 13 (to serve Wellersburg,Pennsylvania) ; People's CommunityTelevision Association, Inc., LaVale,Maryland, Docket No. 14860, File No.BPTTV-1177; Req: Input Channel 9 (viaBPTTV-1176, Washington, D.C. (CBS);Output Channel 7 (to serve Cumberland,Maryland); People's Community Tele-vision Association, Inc., LaVale, Mary-land, Docket No. 14861, File No. BPTTV-1178; Req: Input Channel 7 (via BPTTV-1175), Washington, D.C. (ABC); OutputChannel 9 (to serve Cumberland, Mary-land); People's Community TelevisionAssociation, Inc., LaVale, Maryland,Docket No. 14862, File No. BlTTV-1179;Req:, Input Channel 6 (via BPTTV-1174), Johnstown, Pennsylvania (NBC);Output Channel 12 (to serve Cumber-land, Maryland); for construction per-mits for VHF translator stations.

It is ordered, This 29th day of Novem-ber 1962, that Millard F. French- willpreside at the hearing in the above-entitled proceeding which is herebyscheduled to commence on February 4,1963, in Cumberland, Maryland.

It is further ordered, That a prehear-ing conference in the proceeding will beconvened by the presiding officer at 9:00a.m., Wednesday, January 2, 1963, in theOffices of the Commission; Washington,D.C.

Released: November 30, 1962.FEDERAL COMUNICATIONS

C0 MISSION,[SEAL] BEN. F. WAPLE,,

Acting Secretary.[F.n. Doc. 62-12030; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:52 am.]

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSIONALCOA STEAMSHIP CO., INC., ET At.

Notice of Agreement Filed forApproval

Notice of Ming of Atlantic & GulfAmerican-flag berth operators agree-ment modifying voting rights:

Notice is hereby given that the follow-ing described agreement has been filed

12007

with the Commission for approval pur-suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act,1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C.814):

Agreement 8086-3, between the AlcoaSteamship Company, Inc., American Ex-port Lines, Inc., Isbrandtsen SteamshipCompany, a division of American Ex-port Lines, Inc., American PresidentLines, Ltd., American Union Transport,Inc., Bloomfield Steamship Company,Central Gulf Steamship Corporation,Farrell Lines, Inc., Grace Line, Inc., Isth-mian Lines, Inc., Kulukundis MaritimeIndustries, Inc., Lykes Bros. SteamshipCo., Inc., Matson Navigation Company,Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., Pruden-tial Lines, Inc., States Marine Lines(joint service), Stevenson Lines, LevantLine (joint service), United States LinesCompany, and Waterman SteamshipCorporation, modifies the basic agree-ment, as amended, which provides fortransportation and related services toand from United States Atlantic, GreatLakes and Gulf of Mexico ports, and toand from ports in territories and pos-sessions of the United States, also be-tween foreign ports, for and at the re-quest of the Military Sea TransportationService and related "Shipper Services".

The purpose of this modification is toamend Article 2(a) of Agreement 8086,as amended- to provide (1) that for

-the purpose of transacting business pur-suant to this agreement, a quorum shallconsist of notless than two-thirds of themembers entitled to vote, present in per-son; (2) that when a party cannot bepresent at a meeting, the Secretary maybe authorized to vote for such party asdirected by written proxy submitted tothe Secretary covering the agenda forsuch meeting; and (3) except as other-wise provided, any -action within thescope of this agreement is predicated ona vote of 75 percent of the parties pres-ent and voting at a meeting; as to anymatter having application to a specificregion, only those parties having ashipping contract or rate agreement withMSTS covering such area or regularlyserving a non-contract area shall be en-titled to vote, and such party shall havethe right to have the matter submitted toa full membership vote with actionthereon to be taken by 75 percent of theparties present and voting thereon.

Interested parties may inspect thisagreement and obtain copies thereof atthe Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed-eral Maritime Commission, Washington,D.C., and may submit within 20 daysafter publication of this notice in theFEDERAL REGISTER, written statementswith reference to the agreement andtheir position as to approval, disapproval,or modification, together with request forhearing should such hearing be desired.

Dafed: November-30,1962.

By order of the Federal Maritime Com-mission.

THOlIAs Lisr,Secretary.

[F.R. Doc. 62-11982; Piled, Dec. 4. 1962;8:46 am.]

NOTICES

CUNARD STEAM-SHIP CO., LTD.,ET AL.

Notice of Filing of Agreement forApproval

Notice is hereby given that the follow-ing described agreement has been filedwith the Commission for approval pur-suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act,1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C.814):

Agreement 8940, between the .CunardSteam-Ship Co., Ltd., Thos. & Jno.Brocklebank, Ltd., Port Line, Ltd. and DeForenede Dampskibs Selskab A/S (Scan-dinavian-American Line) covers the es-tablishment and maintenance of a jointcargo service in the trade from theUnited States South Atlantic and Gulfports in the range from Morehead City,N.C. to Brownsville, Texas, inclusive, toBristol Channel ports and ports on theSouth and East Coasts of the UnitedKingdom including the port of London,,under the trade name "Cunard LondonService".

Interested parties may inspect thisagreement and obtain copies thereof atthe Bureau of Foreign Regulations, Fed-eral Maritime Commission, Washington,D.C., and may submit within 20 daysafter publication of this notice in theFEDERAL REGISTER, written statementswith reference to the agreement andtheir position as to approval, disapproval,or modification, together with requestfor hearing should such hearing bedesired.

Dated: November 30, 1962.By order of the Federal Maritime

Commission,THOMAS Lisi,

Secretary.[P.R. Doc. 62-11983; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:47 a.m.]

UNITED STATES LINES CO. ANDWATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP.

Notice of Filing of Agreement forApproval

Notice is hereby given that the follow-ing described agreement has been filedwith the Commission for approval pur-suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act,1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C.814):

Agreement 8860"3, between the cap-tioned parties, provides for the divisionof the American-flag revenue portion ofthe Japan-Atlantic Pool (Agreement8860), on the basis of 75 percent toUnited States Lines, and 25 percent toWaterman Steamship Corporation; formutual agreement as to the shares of any"new American-flag lines" entering intothe arrangement; and for the concur-rence of "other American-flag lines",parties to the Agreement, to the decisionof any American flag-line to withdrawat any time.

Interested parties may inspect thisagreement and obtain copies thereof atthe Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed-eral Maritime Commission, Washington,D.C., and may submit within 20 daysafter publication of this notice in the

FEDERAL REGISTER, written statementswith reference to the agreement andtheir position as to approval, disapproval,or modification, together with requestfor hearing should such hearing bedesired.

bated: November 30, 1962.

By order of the Federal MaritimeCommission.

THoMAs LiSI,Secretary.

[F.h. Doc. 62-11984; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:47 am.]

T. R. SPEDDEN AND SAMUEL SHAPIRO& CO., INC.

Notice of Agreement Filed forApproval

Notice is hereby given that the fol-lowing agreement has been filed with theFederal Maritime Commission for ap-proval pursuant to section 15 of theShipping Act, 1916, as amended. Eachparty is an independent ocean freightforwarder as defined in section 44 of thatAct.

Agreement No. 9093 between T. R.Spedden of New Orleans, and SamuelShapiro & Co., Inc., of Baltimore, pro-vides for the performance of specifiedfreight forwarder services by the lattercompany for the New Orleans forwarder.As compensation, Shapiro will receive66% percent of the service fees per ship-ment, plus one-half of the ocean freightbrokerage.

Interested persons may inspect thisagreement and obtain copies thereof atthe Bureau of Domestic Regulation, Fed-eral Martime Commission, Washington,D.C., or at the Commission's fieldoffices at:45 Broadway, New York 4, N.Y.Room 333, Federal Office Building, South,

600 South Street, New Orleans 12, La.Mail address: P.O. Box 30550, Lafayette

Station, New Orleans 30, La.180 New Montgomery Street, San Fran-

cisco, Calif.

They may submit to the Secretary, Fed-eral Maritime Commission, Washington,D.C., within twenty days after publica-tion of this notice in the FEDERAL REG-ISTER, written statements with referenceto the agreement and their approval,disapproval, or modification, togetherwith request for hearing should suchhearing be desired.


By order of, the Federal MaritimeCommission.

THOMAS Lisi, -

Secretary.

[P.R. Doc. 62-11985; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:47 a.m.]

MODIFICATIONS OF JAPAN/ATLANTIC POOL

Notice- of Extension of Time for theFiling of Comments

Notice is hereby given that the timefor the submission of comments, state-ments, protests, or requests for hearing

with respect to Agreements 8860-1 and8860-2 has, upon request, been extendedthrough the close of business, December12, 1962. Notice of filing for approval,pursuant to section 15 of the ShippingAct, 1916, of Agreements 8860-1 and8860-2, between the Japanese and Amer-ican-flag carriers parties to Agreement8860, providing for the pooling and ap-portionment of revenues derived by thecarriers in the trade from Japan to At-lantic coast ports of the United States,was published in the FEDERAL REGISTERof November 16, 1962.


By order of the Federal Maritime Com-mission.

THomAs Iasi,Secretary.

[P.R. Doe. 62-11986; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:47 am.)

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION[Docket No. C-11294 etc.]

ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS CO.

Notice of Further Extension of Timeand Postponement of Hearing

NOVEMBER 28, 1962.Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company,

Docket Nos. G-11294, G-13459, G-16508,G-19657,'and RP61-11.

Upon consideration of the request filedNovember 26, 1962 by Counsel for Arkan-sas Louisiana Gas Company for a furtherextension of time within which to serveprepared testimony and exhibits for itscase-in-chief upon all parties as orderedin Paragraph (C) of the Commission'sorder of July 5, 1962, and for furtherpostponement of the hearing presentlyscheduled for December 26, 1962;

Notice is hereby given that the timewithin which Arkansas Louisiana GasCompany shall serve its prepared testi-mony 'nd exhibits for its case-in-chiefupon all'parties is hereby further ex-tended to and including December 1,1962, and that the hearing presentlyscheduled for December 26, 1962, is fur-ther postponed to January 25, 1962.

JOSEPH H. GUTRIDE,Secretary.

[P.R. Doc. 62-11987; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:47 a.m.1

[Project No. 2325]

CENTRAL MAINE POWER CO. ANDSKOWHEGAN WATER POWER CO.

NoticeI of Application for License

SNOVEBER 28, 1962.Public notice is hereby given that joint

application has been filed under the Fed-eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a-825r) byCentral Maine Power Company andSkowhegan' Water Power Company(correspondence to: W. H. Kimball, VicePresident, Central Maine Power Com-pany, 9 Green Street, Augusta, Maine)for license for constructed Project No.2325, known as the Western Project. lo-

12008


cated on the Kennebec River, in Somer-set County, Maine.

The project consists of: a concretegravity overflow dam on the North Chan-nel, Kennebec River, 529 feet long andabout 38 feet high provided with fivebays of stanchions and stop-logs total-ling 227 feet in length, 168 feet of hingedfiashboards, and two taintor gates, each16 feet by 28 feet; a composite struc-ture on the South Channel, KennebecRiver, consisting of a concrete hollowgravity dam 215. feet long provided withfive bays of stanchions and stop-logstotalling 177 feet in length, 20 feet offlashboards, and a log sluice with a tain-tor gate 18 feet by 14 feet, three slidegates, each 5.5 feet by 7 feet, an integralconcrete powerhouse intake and sub-structure about 188 feet long providedwith 12 slide gates, each 9 feet by 19feet; a reservoir about 12.6 miles longwith an area of about 930 acres atnormal pool elevation of 156 feet(USGS Datum); a steel frame and brickpowerhouse substructure containingfour hydroelectric units with a generat-ing capacity of 3,000 kw each; and ap-purtenant electrical and mechanicalfacilities.

Protests or petitions to intervene maybe filed with the Federal Power Com-mission, Washington 25, D.C., in ac-cordance with the rules of practice andprocedure of the Commission (18 C.F.R.1.8 or 1.10). The last day upon whichprotests or petitions may be filed isJanuary 21, 1963. The application is onfile wtih the Commission for publicinspection.



[Docket No. RI63-204]

CHICAGO STOCK YARDS RESEARCHCO. ET AL.

Order Providing for Hearing on andSuspension of Proposed Change inRate, and Setting Date for Hearing

NOVEMBER 28, 1962.On October 29, 1962, Chicago Stock

Yards Research Company (ChicagoStock Yards) I tendered for filing a pro-posed change in its presently effectiverate schedule for sale of natural gassubject to the jurisdiction of the Com-mission. The sale is made at a pressurebase of 15.025 psia.

The proposed change is designated asfollows:

Description: Notice of change, dated Oc-tober 29, 1962.

Purchaser: United Gas Pipeline Company.Producing area: Houma Field, Terre-

bonne Parish, La.Rate schedule designation: Supplement

No. 2 to Chicago Stock Yards Research Com-pany (Operator), et al., FPO Gas RateSchedule No. 2.

Proposed rate: 25.25 cents per Mcf.2Effective rate: 23.25 cents per Mcf.2

IAddress is: 1307 First National BankBuilding, 38 Dearborn Street, Chicago 3, I1.

2 Periodic rate increase.3Present rate is in effect subject to re-

fund in Docket No. RIGI-28.

FEDERAL REGISTER

Annual increase: -$14,000.Effective date: November 29, 1962 (effec-

tive date is the first day after the expirationof the required statutory notice).

Under section 4(a) of the Natural GasAct all rates which are not just and rea-sonable are declared unlawful. If aftera hearing the Commission finds the pro-posed increased rate unjust and unrea-sonable it must be disallowed.

The rate proposed by Chicago StockYards is higher than any presently effec-tive rate in South Louisiana.5 Therefore,since the filing of such rate, which isgreatly in excess of the applicable pricelevel set forth in the Commission's State-ment of General Policy No. 61-1, asamended, may serve as a basis for a priceredetermination at a higher rate underother gas purchase contracts in the area,there is need to suspend the effectivenessof the proposed rate and to order anexpeditious hearing thereon.

In ordering the suspension and aprompt hearing concerning the justnessand reasonableness of the proposed rate,it should be noted that under section4(e) of the Act the burden of proof toshow that the increased rate or chargeis just and reasonable is upon the nat-ural-gas company. This burden of proofrests upon the natural-gas company atthe time of the filing and at all timesthereafter. No burden of proof restsupon the Commission's staff or upon in-terveners. If the respondent's proof insupport thereof is insufficient the Com-mission has no alternative but to dis-allow the proposed rate for failure tomeet the burden of proof imposed bythe statute.

In view of the need for expeditiousaction herein, the hearing examiner isdirected to take all steps necessary tomake certain that the hearing proceedswith the greatest dispatch. Direct pres-entations by the respondent, which underthe terms of this order must be distrib-uted no less than 11 days prior to thehearing, will be incorporated into therecord on the first day of hearing andcross-examination thereon will proceedimmediately without recess.

The increased rate and charge so pro-Posed may be unjust, unreasonable, un-duly discriminatory, or preferential, orotherwise unlawful.

The Commission finds: It is necessaryand proper in the public interest andto aid in the enforcement of the provi-sions of the Natural Gas Act that theCommission enter upon a hearing con-cerning the lawfulness of the proposed

uThere are proposed increases in ratesto 25.55 cents per Mcf involved in H. L. Hunt,et al., Docket No. R162-467, et al. By orderissued June 14, 1962, in these consolidatedproceedings, the Commission suspended theproposed rates for five months and orderedan immediate hearing to determine the law-fulness of the rates. In many of these pro-ceedings respondents were permitted to with-draw their rate filings. The remainingproceedings are now pending before the Com-mission on motions to dismiss made by thestaff at the conclusion of respondents' pres-entations. Similiarly, a proposed rate in-crease to 25.50 cents per Mcf was suspendedby order issued October 31, 1962 in Hunt OilCompany. Docket No. RI63-128, and an ia-mediate hearing was ordered.

12009

change, that the above-designated sup-plement be suspended and the use thereofdeferred as hereinafter ordered, and thatappropriate hearing procedures be pre-scribed.

The Commission orders:(A) Pursuant to the authority of the

Natural Gas Act, particularly sections 4,15, and 16 thereof, the Commission'srules of practice and procedure and theregulations under the Natural Gas Act(18 CFR Ch. I), a hearing shall be heldin the above-styled proceeding on Jan-uary, 15, 1963 commencing at 10:00 a.m.,e.s.t, in a Hearing Room of the FederalPower Commission, 441 G Street NW.,Washington, D.C., concerning the law-fulness of the proposed increased rateand charge of Chicago Stock Yards con-tained in the above-designated supple-ment.

(B) Pending such hearing and deci-sion hereon, the above-designated ratesupplement of Chicago Stock Yards ishereby suspended and the use thereofdeferred until April 29, 1963, and there-after until such further time as it is madeeffective in the manner prescribed bythe Natural Gas Act.

(C) On or before January 4,1963, Chi-cago Stock Yards shall serve upon allparties to the proceeding its direct evi-dence in support of its proposed in-creased rate and charge for the subjectsale; at the beginning of the hearing,witnesses for Chicago Stock Yards shalladopt their testimony and be cross-ex-amined; the Presiding Examiner shallthen determine and order such furtherprocedures as will expedite the determi-nation of the issues in this proceeding.

(D) Neither the supplement herebysuspended, nor the rate schedule soughtto be altered thereby, shall be changeduntil this proceeding has been disposedof or until the period of suspension hasexpired, unless otherwise ordered by theCommission.

(E) Notices of intervention or peti-tions to intervene may be filed with theFederal Power Commission, Washington25, D.C., in accordance with the rulesof practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8and 1.37(f)) on or before December 17,1962. Answers to petitions to intervenemay be filed within ten days after thedate of service of the petition, but in noevent later than December 26, 1962.

By the Commission.

GORON M. GRANT,Acting Secretary.

[F.R. Doc. 62-11989; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:48 aan.]

[Docket No. CP63-71]

CITY OF JASONVILLE, IND.

Notice of Application

NOVEIBER 28, 1962.Take notice that on September 20,

1962, The City of Jasonville, Indiana,(Applicant) flell in Docket No. CP63-71an application pursuant to section 7(a)of the Natural Gas Act for an order ofthe Commission directing Texas GasTransmission Corporation (Texas Gas)to establish physical connection of itstransmission facilities with the proposed

2NOTICES-

facilties of and to sell natural gas toApplicant for resale and distribution inJasonville and environs, including theCoalmont area, all as more fully set forthin the application on file with the Com-mission and open to public inspection.

Applicant proposes to construct andoperate two lateral pipelines extendingfrom two points of connection- withTexas Gas' transmission line to townborder stations in Jasonville and Coal-mont. Applicant will also construct thenecessary distribution facilties to providethe proposed service.

The application shows Applicant's esti-mated third year peak day and annualnatural gas requirements to be 742 Mcfand 79,632 Mcf, respectively.

The total estimated cost of transmis-sion and distribution facilities for theproject is $389,000, which cost will befinanced by the issuance of gas revenuebonds.

On October 23, 1962, Texas Gas filedan answer to the subject applicationstating that it had no objection to ren-dering the requested service, provided,among other things, that: (1) Texas Gasshould not be obligated to render theproposed service until completion of thefacilities authorized in Docket No. CP62-195, and (2) Jasonville executes a serviceagreement acceptable to Texas Gaswithin 45 days after the. issuance of anyorder directing the requested service.

Protests, petitions to intervene or re-quests for hearing in this proceeding maybe filed with the Federal Power Commis-sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accordancewith the rules of practice and procedure(18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before Decem-ber 21, 1962. 1JOSEPH H. GUTRIDE,

Secretary.

[P.R. Doc. -62-11990; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:48 a.m.]


EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO.

Notice of Application and Date ofHearing

NOVEMBER 28, 1962.Take notice that on September 17,

1962, El Paso Natural Gas Company (Ap-plicant), V.O. Box 1492, El Paso, Texas,filed in Docket No. CP63-67, an applica-tion pursuant to section 7(c of theNatural Gas Act for a certificate of pub-lic convenience and necessity authorizingthe conistructioh of small scale routinebudget-type facilities during the calendaryear 1963i 'the operation thereof and thesale and delivery of natural gas by usethereof, and the sale and delivery ofnautral gas by use of facilities con-structed, owned and operated by PacificGas Transmission Company (PGT),' to

1PGT, under authority issued in Docket

No. G -17350, will transport for the accountof El Paso natural gas to be pulrchased b~y MlPaso from Westcoast Transmission Companyat Kingsgate, British Columbia. Deliveriesof gas so transported will be made by PGTto E Paso at the delivery points, authorizedIn Docket No. CP62-59, specified by El Pasoalong PGT's pipeline in the States of Idaho,L Washington and Oregon. At each point of

its existing authorized 7resale customersfor resale and general distribution andfor resale on a limited-term project basis,for well drilling operations, all as morefully set forth in the application on filewith the Commission and open to publicinspection.- The proposed facilities consist of:

A. Facilities required for natural gasservice to customers for resale and gen-eral distribution. 1. A total a thirty(30) main line taps, together with stand-ard appurtenances necessary for theoperation thereof, to be installed at vari-ous locations along the transmissionpipelines of El Paso at an estimated costof $400 for each installation and an ag-gregate cost not to exceed $1,200.

2. A total of twenty-five (25) mainline measuring and regulating and/orcheck metering stations to be installedat various locations along the transmis-sion pipeline system of El Paso or adja-cent to the transmission pipeline systemof PGT, together with main line tap fa-cilities to be installed on the transmis-sion pipelines of El Paso as necessary, atan estimated cost of $2,000 to $8,000 foreach installation and an aggregate costnot. to exceed $175,000.

3. A total of three (3) lateral pipe-lines of not less than 2% inches nor morethan 6% inches in outside diameter to-gether with, as necessary, related mainline taps, measuring and regulating and/or check metering stations and thestandard appurtenances necessary forthe operation thereof to be installed atvarious locations along and extendingfrom either the transmission pipelinesof Applicant or the pipeline system ofPGT, at anestimated cost not to exceed$350,000 for each installation and anaggregate cost not to exceed $1,050,000.

B. Facilities required for natural gasservice to customers for resale drillinggas service. 1. Main line or field linetap facilities, together with standard ap-purtenances necessary for the operationthereof, to be installed at up to a totalof fifteen (15) separate locations, at anestimated cost of $400 for each installa-tion and an aggregate cost not to exceed$6,000.

2. Portable measuring and regulatingfacilities, together with standard appur-tenances necessary for the operationthereof, to be installed at up to a totalof fifteen (15) main line or field linetap locations, at an estimated cost of$1,200 for each installation and anaggregate cost not to exceed $18,000.

The sale and delivery of natural gasto be made by utilization of the facilitiesdescribed in Item A above is estimatedto range-from 50 Mcf per day to 500 Mcfper day per tap, from 50 Mcf per dayto 5,000 Mcf per day per meter stationand from 50 Mcf per day to 5,000 Mcfper day per lateral line with ai annualvolume to be delivered through all such

delivery to El Paso, PGT will install, ownand operate a transportation measuring sta-tion. Where the point of delivery by El Pasoto its customers is adjacent to PGT's meas-uring facilities and El Paso's customers agreeto accept, for billing purposes, the volumesas measured by PGT's measuring facilities,El Paso does not propose to install .facilitiesadditional to those installed by PGT.

facilities not to exceed 6,45b,000 Mcfduring the third year of operation, allmeasured at 14.73 psia.. The sale and delivery of natural gasto be made by utilization of the facili-ties described in Item B above is of alimited term and is estimated to range,in volume from 200 Mcf to 3,000 Mcfper day per well and the normal dura-tion of drilling operations for each suchwell is anticipated to range from 30 to90 days with an annual volume to bedelivered through all of such facilitiesnot to exceed 300,000 Mcf. The meas-uring and regulating facilities will beof a portable nature And may thus beutilized at succjessive locations followingtheir removal from a prior drilling gastap location.

The estimated maximum cost of allfacilities for which certificate authorityis sought by El Paso is $1,261,000. Noincrease in main line capacity is pro-posed by El Paso and rates and chargesfor all sales and deliveries made will bein conformity with rate schedules onfile with the Commission.. This m'atter is one that should be dis-posed of as promptly as possible underthe applicable rules and regulations andto that end:. Take further notice that, pursuanit to

the authority contained in and subjectto the jurisdiction conferred upon theFederal Power Commission by sections7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, andthe Commission's 3ules of practice andprocedure, a hearing will be held onJanuary-9, 1963, at 9:30 am., e.s.t., ina Hearing Room of the Federal PowerCommission, 441 G Street NW., Wash-ington, D.C., concerning the mattersinvolved in and the issues presented bysuch application: Provided, however,That the Commission 'may, after a non-contested hearing, dispose of the pro-ceedings pursuant to the provisions of§ 1.30(c) (1) or (2) of the Commission'srules of practice gnd procedure. Underthe procedure herein provided for, un-less otherwise advised, it will be unnec-essary for Applicant to appear or berepresented at the hearing.

Protests or petitions to intervene maybe -filed with the Federal Power Com-mission, Washington 25, D.C., in accord-ance with the rules of practice andprocedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on orbefore December 28, 1962. Failure ofany party to appear at and participatein the hearing shall be construed aswaiver of and concurrence in omissionherein of the intermediate decision-pro-cedure in cases where a request thereforis made.


[F.R. Doc. 62-11991; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:48 an.l

[Docket No. CP63-75]'

NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANYOF AMERICA

Notice of Application and Date of"Hearing- NOVEMBER 28, 1962.

Take notice that onSeptember 24,1962,Natural Gas Pipeline Company of Amer-

12010


ica (Applicant), 122 South MichiganAvenue, Chicago 3, Illinois, filed in Dock-et No. CP63-75 an application pursuantto section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Actfor a certificate of public convenienceand necessity authorizing the construc-tion during the calendar year 1963 andthe operation of field facilities to enableApplicant to take into its certificatedmain pipeline system natural gas whichwill be purchased from producers there-of, all as more fully set forth in the ap-plication which is on file with the Com-mission and open to public inspection.

The purpose of this "budget-type" ap-plication is to augment Applicant'sability to act with reasonable dispatchin contracting for and connecting to itspipeline system new supplies of naturalgas in various producing areas generallyco-extensive with said system.

The total cost of the proposed facilitieswill not exceed a maximum of $3,500,000and no single project will exceed a costof $500,000. The application states thatthe proposed facilities will be financedfrom funds on hand.

This matter is one that should be dis-posed of as promptly as possible underthe applicable rules and regulations andto that end:

Take further notice that, pursuant tothe authority contained in and subjectto the jurisdiction conferred upon theFederal Power Commission by sections 7and 15 of the Natural Gas Act,-and theCommission's rules of practice and pro-cedure, a hearing will be held on January16, 1963, at 9:30 am., e.s.t., in a HearingRoom of the Federal Power Commission,441 G Street NW., Washington, D.C.,concerning the matters involved in andthe issues presented by such application:Provided, however, That the Commissionmay, after a non-contested hearing, dis-pose of the proceedings pursuant to theprovisions of § 1.30(c) (1) or (2) of theCommission's rules of practice and pro-cedure. Under the procedure herein pro-vided for, unless otherwise advised, it willbe unnecessary for Applicant to appearor be represented at the hearing.

Protests or petitions to intervene maybe filed with the Federal Power Commis-sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accordancewith the rules of practice and procedure(18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before January7, 1963. Failure of any party to appearat and participate in the hearing shallbe construed as waiver of and concur-rence in omission herein of the inter-mediate decision procedure in caseswhere a request therefor is made.




UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO.

Notice of Application and Date ofHearing

NOVEMBER 28, 1962.Take notice that on September 7, 1962,

as supplemented on September 18, 1962,United Gas Pipe Line Company (Appli-cant), 1525 Fairfield Avenue, Shreve-port, Louisiana, filed in Docket No. CP

63-58 an application pursuant to section7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for a cer-tificate of public convenience and neces-sity authorizing the construction duringthe calendar year 1963 and the operationof field facilities to enable Applicant totake into its certificated main pipelinesystem natural gas which will be pur-chased from producers thereof, all asmore fully set forth in the applicationwhich is on file with the Commission andopen to public inspection.

The purpose of this "budget-type" ap-plication is to augment Applicant'sability to act with reasonable dispatch incontracting for and connecting to itspipeline system new supplies of naturalgas in various producing areas generallyco-extensive with said system.

The total cost of the proposed facil-ities will not exceed a maximum of$1,500,000, and no single project will ex-ceed a cost of $375,000. The applicationstates that the proposed facilities will befinanced from current working funds.

This matter is one that should be dis-posed of as promptly as possible underthe applicable rules and regulations andto that end:

Take further notice that, pursuant tothe authority contained in and subjectto the jurisdiction conferred upon theFederal Power Commission by sections 7and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and theCommission's rules of practice and pro-cedure, a hearing will be held on Jan-uary 17, 1963, at 9:30 am., e.s.t., in aHearing Room of the Federal PowerCommission, 441 G Street NW., Washing-ton, D.C., concerning the matters in-volved in and the issues presented bysuch application: Provided, however,That the Commission may, after a non-contested hearing, dispose of the pro-ceedings pursuant to the provisions of§ 1.30(c) (1) or (2) of the Commission'srules of practice and procedure. Underthe procedure herein provided for, un-less otherwise advised, it will be un-necessary for Applicant to appear or berepresented at the hearing.

Protests or petitions to intervene maybe filed with the Federal Power Com-mission, Washington 25, D.C., in accord-ance with the rules of practice and pro-cedure (18 CFR 1.8- or 1.10) on or be-fore January 7, 1963. Failure of anyparty to appear at and participate inthe hearing shall be construed as waiverof and concurrence in omission hereinof the intermediate decision procedure incases where a request therefor is made.


[F.R. Doc. 62-11993; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:48 azm.]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION[File No. 1-3842]

BLACK BEAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

Order Summarily Suspending Trading

NOVEMBsER 29, 1962.The common stock, par value 15 cents

a share, of Black Bear Industries, Inc.

(formerly Black Bear Consolidated Min-ing Co.), being listed and registered onthe San Francisco Mining Exchange, anational securities exchange; and

The Commission being of the opini(nthat the public interest requires the sum-mary suspension of trading in such se-curity on such Exchange and that suchaction is necessary and appropriate forthe protection of investors; and

The Commission being of the opinionfurther that such suspension is neces-sary in order to prevent fraudulent, de-ceptive or manipulative acts or prac-tices, with the result that it will beunlawful under section 15(c)-(2) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and theCommission's Rule 15c2-2 thereunderfor any broker or dealer to make use ofthe mails or of any means or instru-mentality of interstate commerce to ef-fect any transaction in, or to induce orattempt to induce the purchase or saleof such security, otherwise than on anational securities exchange;

It is ordered, Pursuant to section 19(a) (4) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 that trading in said security onthe San Francisco Mining Exchange besummarily suspended in order to pre-vent fraudulent, deceptive or manipula-tive acts or practices, this order to beeffective for a period of ten (10) days,November 30, 1962, through December 9,1962, both dates inclusive.

By the Commission.

[SEAL] ORVAL L. DuBois,Secretary.


[File No. 1-4583]

PRECISION MICROWAVE CORP.

Order Summarily Suspending Trading

NOVEMBER 29, 1962.The Common Stock, Par Value $1.00,

of Precision Microwave Corp., beinglisted and registered on the AmericanStock Exchange, a national securitiesexchange; and

The Commission being of the opinionthat the public interest requires the sum-mary suspension of trading in suchsecurity on such Exchange and that suchaction is necessary and appropriate forthe protection of investors; and

The Commission being of the opinionfurther that such suspension is necessaryin order to prevent fraudulent, deceptiveor manipulative acts or practices, withthe result that it will be unlawful undersection 15(c) (2) of the Securities Ex-change Act of 1934 and the Commission'sRule 15c2-2 thereunder for any brokeror dealer to make use of the mails or of.any means or instrumentality of inter-state commerce to effect any transactionin, or to induce or attempt to induce thepurchase or sale of such security, other-wise than on a national securities ex-change;

It is ordered, Pursuant to section 19 (a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, that trading in said security on theAmerican Stock Exchange be summarilysuspended in order to prevent fraudulent,deceptive or manipulative acts or prac-

FEDERAL -REGISTER 12011

NOTICES

tices, this order to be effective for aperiod of ten (10) days, November 30,1962, through December 9, 1962, bothdates inclusive.

By the Commission.

[SEAL] ORVAL L. DuBois,Secretary.

[F.R. Doe. 62-11998; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:49 aam.]

[File No. 1-8412]

PROSPER OIL AND MINING CO.

Order Sumnarily Suspending TradingNOVEMBER 29, 1962.

The common stock of the par value often cents, of Prosper Oil and MiningCompany, being listed and registered onthe Salt Lake Stock Exchange, a nationalsecurities exchange; and

The Commission being of the opinionthat the public interest requires the sum-mary suspension of trading in such stockon such exchange and that such action isnecessary and appropriate for the pro-tection of investors; and

The Commission being of the opinionfurther that such suspension is necessaryin order to prevent fraudulent, deceptiveor manipulative acts or practices, withthe result that it will be unlawful undersection 15(c) (2) of the Securities Ex-change Act of 1934 and the Commission'sRule 15c2-2 thereunder for any brokeror dealer to make use of the mails or ofany means or instrumentality of inter-state commerce to effect any transactionIn, or to induce or attempt to induce thepurchase or sale of such security, other-wise than on a national securities ex-change;

It is ordered, Pursuant to section 19 (a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of'1934, that trading in said security on theSalt Lake Stock Exchange be summarilysuspended in order to prevent fraudu-lent, deceptive or manipulative acts orpractices, this order to be effective forthe period of ten (10) days, November30, 1962, through December 9, 1962, bothdates inclusive.

By the Commission.[SEAL] ORVAL L. DuBois,

Secretary.[P.R. Doe. 62-11999; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:49 am.]

OFFICE OF EMERGENCYPLANNING

JOHN H. TOLAN

Appointee's Statement of BusinessInterests

The following statement lists thenames and concerns required by- subsec-tion 710(b)(6) of the Defense Produc-tion Act of 1950, as amended.1. John H. Tolan, Jr., Realtor,

1104 Campbell Street,Richmond, Calif.

2. John H. Tolan, Jr., Treasurer,Barrett Homes, Inc.,1800 Evans Avenue,

San Francisco 24, Calif.(No stock ownership,)

Not a stockholder, bondholder, officer, orinterest -holder in any corporation or anyother business.

This amends statement published inthe FEDEAL REGISTER, May 15, 1962 (27P.R. 4601).

JoN H. TOLAN.OCTOBER 2, 1962.,

[F.n. Doe. 62-11976; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:45 am.]

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRA-TION

[Delegation of Authority No. 30-XI-1O]

MANAGER DISASTER FIELD OFFICE,GUAM

Delegation Relating to FinancialAssistance Functions

I. Pursuant to the authority delegatedto the Regional Director by Delegationof Authority No. 30 (Revision 7), 27 P.R.6247, there is hereby redelegated to theManager of Guam Disaster Field Officethe following authority:

A. Financial assistance. 1. To approvebut not decline disaster loans in anamount not exceeding $20,000.

2. To execute loan authorizations forWashington and Regional Office ap-proved loans and for disaster loans ap-proved under delegated authority, 'saidexecution to read as follows:

(Name), Administrator.By .-

(Name)-Manager, Disaster Field Office.

* 3. To cancel, reinstate, modify andamend authorizations for disaster loansapproved under delegated authority.

4. To request checks for and disburseunsecured disaster loans.

5. To extend the disbursement periodon all loan authorizations or undisbursedportions of loans.

II. The authority delegated hereinmay.not be redelegated.

III. All authority delegated hereinmay be exercised by any SBA employeedesignated as Acting Manager of thedisaster field office.

Effective date: November 26, 1962.

EDWARD L. TURKINGTON,Regional Director, Region XII,

San Francisco Regional Office.[F.R. Doe. 62-12001; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:49 a.m.]

INTERSTATE COMMERCECOMMSSIOl

[Notice 234]

MOTOR CARRIER ALTERNATE ROUTEDEVIATION NOTICES

NOVEMBER 30, 1962.The following letter-notices of pro-

posals to operate over deviation routesfor operating convenience only have been

frled with the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, under the Commission's Devia-tion Rules Revised, 1957 (49 CFR 211.1(c) (8)) and notice thereof to all inter-ested persons is hereby given dasprovidedin such rules (49 CFR 211.1(d) (4)).

Protests against the use of any pro-posed deviation route 'herein describedmay be filed with the Interstate Com-merce Commission in the manner and

-form provided in such rules (49 CFR211.1(e)) at-any time but will not oper-ate to stay commencement of the pro-posed operations unless filed within 30days from the date of publication.

Successively filed letter-notices of thesame carrier under the Commission'sDeviation Rules Revised,. 1957, will benumbered consecutively for conveniencein identification and protests if anyshould refer to stich letter-notices bynumber.

MOTOR CARRIERs OF PROPERTY

No. MC-2202 (Deviation No. 50)ROADWAY -EXPRESS, INC., 1077Gorge Boulevard, Akron 10, Ohio, filedNovember 21, 1962. Carrier proposesto operate as a common carrier by mo-tor vehicle of general commodities, withcertain exceptions, over a deviationroute, as follows: from Washington,D.C., over U.S. Highway 29 to Reidsville,N.C., thence over U.S. Highway 158 tojunction North Carolina Highway 68,thence over North Carolina Highway 68to Junction North Carolina Highway150, thence -over North Carolina High-way 150 to Winston-Salem, N.C., andreturn over the same route, for oper-.ating convenience only. The notice in-*dicates that the carrier is presentlyauthorized to transport the same com-modities over a pertinent authorizedservice route as follows: From Wash-ington over U.S. Highway 1 to junctionU.S. 'Highway 158, thence qver U.S.Highway 158 to junction U.S. Highway15, thence over U.S. Highway 15 to Dur-ham, N.C., thence over U.S. Highway 70to junction alternate U.S. Highway 70,thence over alternate U.S. Highway 70to Junction U.S. Highway 421, thenceover U.S. Highway 421 to Winston-Salem, and return over the same route.

No. MC-10872 (Deviation No. 5) BE-MAC TRANSPORT COIPANY, INC.,7400 North Broadway, St. Louis 15, Mo.,fied November 8, 1962. Carrier proposesto operate as a common carrier by motorvehicle of general commodities, with cer-tain exceptions, over a deviation routeas follows: From junction U.S. High-way 66 and Illinois Highway 83 overIllinois Highway 83 to junction IllinoisHighway 72, thence over Illinois High-way 72 to Chicago, Ill., and return overthe same route, for operating conven-ience only. The notice indicates thatthe carrier is presently authorized totransport the same commodities over apertinent authorized service route be-tween St. Louis, Mo., and Chicago overU.S. Highway 66.

No. MC-59583 (Deviation No. 9) THEMASON & DIXON LINES, INCORPO-RATED, Eastman 'Road, Kingsport,Tenn., filed November 13, 1962. Carrierproposes to operate as a common carrierby motor vehicle of general commodities,with certain exceptions, over a deviation

12012


route as follows: From the junction ofU.S. Highway 1 and Virginia Highway207 over Virginia Highway 207 to junc-tion U.S. Highway 301, thence over U.S.Highway 301 to Middletown, Md., thenceover U.S. Highway 301S to junction ofU.S. Highway 301N and thence over U.S.Highway 301 to junction U.S. Highway40 approximately 2 miles south of theDelaware Memorial Bridge, and returnover the same route, for operating con-venience only. The notice indicates thatthe carrier ii presently authorized totransport the same commodities overpertinent service routes as follows: FromRoanoke, Va. over U.S. Highway 460 toAppomattox, Va., thence Virginia High-way 24 to junction U.S. Highway 60,thence over U.S. Highway 60 to Rich-mond, Va., and thence over U.S. Highway1 to Washington, D.C.; from Winchester,Va., over U.S. Highway 50 to Washington,and thence over U.S. Highway 1 to NewYork, N.Y., and retum over the saffieroutes.

No. MC-59649 (Deviation No. 4) PE-ORIA CARTAGE COMPANY 905-911Southwest Washington Street, Peoria,Ill., filed November 19, 1962. Carrierproposes to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, of general commodi-ties, with certain exceptions, over a de-viation route as follows: From DeerCreek, fl., over Interstate Highway 74 toMorton, Ill., and return over -the sameroute, for operating convenience only.The notice indicates that the carrier ispresently authorized to transport thesame commodities between Deer Creekand Morton over U.S. Highway 150.

No. MC-107500 (deviation No. 12)BURLINGTON TRUCK LINES, INC.,796 South Pearl Street, Galesburg, Ill.,filed November 12, 1962. Carrier pro-poses to operate as a common carrier bymotor vehicle of general commodities,with certain exceptions, over a deviationroute as follows: From junction U.S.Highways 36 and 24 at Monroe City,Mo., over U.S. Highway 24 to junctionMissouri Highway 10 near Carrollton,Mo., thence over Missouri Highway 10to junction U.S. Highway 69 near Ex-celsior Springs, Mo., and return over thesame route, for operating convenienceonly. The notice indicates that the car-rier is presently authorized to transportthe same commodities over pertinentservice routes as follows: From Kan-sas City, Mo., over U.S. Highway 71 tojunction City U.S. Highway 71, thenceover City U.S. Highway 71 to St. Joseph,Mo., and thence over U.S. Highway 36to Jacksonville, Ill.; and from KansasCity over U.S. Highway 69 to Des Moines,Iowa, and return over the same routes.

MOTOR CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS

No. MC-1501 (deviation No. 89) THEGREYHOUND CORPORATION, 1740Main Street, Kansas City 8, Mo., filedNovember 12, 1962. The carrier pro-poses to operate as a common carrier bymotor vehicle of passengers and theirbaggage over a deviation route as fol-lows: From junction U.S. Highway 12and Minnesota Highway 100 approxi-mately 2 miles east of St. Paul overMinnesota Highway 100 to junction Min-nesota Highway 36, thence over Minne-

FEDERAL REGISTER

sota Highway 36 to Minneapolis, Minn.,and return over the route, for operatingconvenience only. The notice indicatesthat the carrier is presently authorizedto transport passengers over a pertinentauthorized service route as follows: Fromthe junction of Wisconsin Highway 172and U.S. Highway 12 over U.S. Highway12 to junction unnumbered highway,thence over unnumbered highway toWoodville, Wis., thence return over un-numbered highway to junction U.S.Highway 12 thence over U.S. Highway 12to St. Paul, Minn., and return over thesame route.

No. MC-13300 (deviation No. 5) CAR-OLINA COACH COMPANY, Post OfficeBox 1591, Raleigh, N.C., filed Novem-ber 19, 1962. Carrier proposes to oper-ate as a common carrier by motorvehicle of passengers and their baggageover a deviation route as follows: FromRaleigh, N.C., over relocated U.S. High-way 1 to junction North Carolina High-way 55, thence over combined U.S. High-way 1 and North Carolina Highway 55to Apex, N.C., and return over the sameroute, for operating convenience only.The notice indicates that the carrier ispresently authorized to transport pas-sengers over a pertinent authorized serv-ice route as follows: From Raleigh overU.S. Highway 1 to Sanford, N.C., andreturn over the same route.

By the Commission.[SEAL] HAROLD D. McCoy,

Secretary.[F.R. Doc. 62-12007; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;

8:50 a.m.]

[Section 5a Application No. 2]

WESTERN RAILROAD TRAFFICASSOCIATION

Application for Approval of Amend-ments to Agreement

NOVEMBER 30, 1962.The Commission is in receipt of an

application in the above-entitled andnumbered proceeding for approval ofamendments to the agreement thereinapproved under the provisions of section5a of the Interstate Commerce Act.

Filed November 25, 1962 by: Mr. T. H.Maguire, Attorney-in-Fact and Counselfor Applicants, Room 514 Union Station,Chicago 6, Ill.

Amendments involved: Change section8(i) of Article VIII, SouthwesternFreight Bureau, and section 7(e) of Arti-cle IX, Texas-Louisiana Freight Bureau,of the Articles of Organization and Pro-cedure so as to provide that independentactions requiring establishment of point-to-point rates (not mileage or grouprates) be published for account of allparticipating lines that do not instructthe Chairman to the contrary.

The application may be inspected atthe office of the Commission in Washing-ton, D.C.

Any interested person desiring theCommission to hold a hearing upon suchapplication shall request the Commis-sion in writing so to do within 20 daysfrom the date of this notice. As pro-vided by the general rules of practice

12013

of the Commission, persons other thanapplicants should fairly disclose theirinterest, and the position they intend totake at the hearing with respect to theapplication. Otherwise the Commissionin its discretion, may proceed to investi-gate and determine the matters involvedin such application without further orformal hearing.

By the Commission, division 2.


[F.R. Doe. 62-12010; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962;8:50 a.m.]

FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONSFOR RELIEF

NOVEMBER 30, 1962.Protests to the granting of an appli-

cation must be prepared in accordancewith Rule 40 of the General Rules ofPractice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within15 days from the date of publication ofthis notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER.

LONG-AND-SHORT HAUL

FSA No. 38055: Asphalt to North Da-kota and Minnesota points. Filed byChicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadCompany (No. 65), and the NorthernPacific Railway Company (No. 130), forthemselves. Rates on asphalt (asphal-tum), natural, by-product or petroleum(other than paint, stain or varnish), intank-car loads, subject to aggregate ship-ment of not less than 20 cars, as de-scribed in the application, from Billings,East Billings, Laurel, Mont., and Cody,Wyo., to Fargo and West Fargo, N. Dak.,Moorhead and Dilworth, Minn.

Grounds for relief: Market competi-tion.

Tariffs: Supplements 3 and 23 to Chi-cago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadCompany's tariff I.C.C. 20551 and North-ern Pacific Railway Company's tariffI.C.C. 9977, respectively.

FSA No. 38056: Scrap iron or steelfrom Cincinnati, Ohio. Filed by TrafficExecutive Association-Eastern Railroads,Agent (ER No. 2645), for interested railcarriers. Rates on scrap iron or steel(not copper clad), in carloads, subjectto aggregate minimum of 600 tons, fromCincinnati, Ohio to points in Pennsyl-vania, also Brilliant and Steubenville,Ohio and Weirton, W. Va.

Grounds for relief: Barge competition.Tariff: Supplement 47 to Traffic Ex-

ecutive Association-Eastern Railroadstariff I.C.C. 4807.

By the Commission.



[Notice 724]

MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFERPROCEEDINGS

NOVEMBER 30, 1962.Synopses of orders entered pursuant

to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com-merce Act, and rules and regulations pre-

NOTICES-

scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179),appear below:

As provided in the Commission's -spe-cial rules of practice any interested per-son may file a petition seeking recon-sideration of the following numberedproceedings within 20 days from the dateof publication of this notice. Pursuantto section 17(8) of the Interstate Com-merce Act, the filing of such a petitionwill postpone the effective date of theorder in that proceeding pending its dis-position. The matters relied upon bypetitioners must be specified in theirpetitions with particularity.

No. MC-FC 65165. By order of No-vember 27, 1962, the Transfer Board ap-proved the transfer to Machinery Trans-ports, Inc., Oklahoma City, Okla., ofCertificates Nos. MC 19564 Sub 2 andMC 19564 Sub 8, issued September 17,1948, and October 19, 1951, respectively,to L. C. Jones Trucking Company, acorporation, Oklahoma City; Okla., au-thorizing the transportation, over ir-regular routes, of: Heavy machinery andoil field pipe and equipment, betweenpoints in-Illinois, on the one hand, and,on the other, points in Colorado, Kansas,Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma,Texas, and Wyoming;* machinery andmachinery parts, (other than oil-fieldmachinery and parts therefor), whichbecause of size or weight require specialhandling or rigging, from Chicago, Ill.,to points in Oklahoma and Texas; frompoints in Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma,and Texas, to points in Arkansas, Colo-rado, Kansas, and New Mexico, and be-tween points in Missouri, Oklahoma, andTexas; pipe, from Memphis, Tenn., topoints in Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma,and Texas. Max G. Morgan, 450 Amer-ican National Building, Oklahoma City,Okla., attorney for Applicants.

No. MC-FC 65386. By order of No-vember 29, 1962, the Transfer Board ap-proved the transfer to Citeher Trans-portation Co., Inc., Brooklyn, N.Y., ofCertificate No. MC 73905, issued Decem-ber 14, 1959, to Cirilo Fletcher andElizabeth Fletcher, doing business asCitcher Transportation C o m p any,Brooklyn, N.Y., authorizing the trans-portation of: Household goods, betweenNew York, N.Y., on the one hand, and,on the other, points in New Jersey, Con-necticut, Massachusetts, and Pennsyl-vania, and those in New York within 50miles of New York, N.Y., uncrated newand used furniture, between New York,N.Y., on the one hand, and, on theother, points in Pennsylvania as speci-fied, and furniture, between New York,N.Y., on the one hand, and, on theother, points in New Jersey, Connecti-cut, Massachusetts, and portions ofPennsylvania and New York as specified.William D. Traub, 10 East 40th Street,New York 16, N.Y., representative forapplicants.



[Notice No. 494]

MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS ANDCERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS

NOVEMBER 30, 1962.The following publications are gov-

erned by the Interstate Commerce Com-mission's general rules of practice in-.cluding special rules (49 CFR 1.241)governing notice of filing of applicationsby motor carriers of property or passen-gers or brokers under sections 206, 209,and 211 of the Interstate Commerce Actand certain other proceedings with re-spect thereto.

All hearings and prehearing confer-,ences will be called at 9:30 a.m., UnitedStates standard time (or 9:30 a.m., localdaylight saving time, if that time is ob-served), unless otherwise specified.APPLICATIONS ASSIGNED FOR ORAL HEAR-

ING OR PREHEARING CONFERENCE

MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY

No. MC 222 (Sub-No. 28), filed October24, 1962. Applicant: NEW YORK CON-SOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPO-RATION, 2116 Northwest Savier Street,Portland, Oreg. Applicant's representa-tive: E. R. Kershner, 715 South 25thAvenue, Bellwood, Ill. Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over regular routes, transport-ing: General commodities (except thoseof unusual value, Classes A and B ex-plosives, livestock, green hides, householdgoods as defined by the Commission,commodities in bulk, and those requiringspecial equipment), serving the plantsite of Cottrell Paper Company locatedat Rock City Falls, N.Y., as an off-routepoint in connection with applicant's au-thorized regular-route operations.

HEARING: January 24, 1963, at theFederal Building, Albany, N.Y., beforeExaminer Armin G. Clement.

No. MC 222 (Sub-No. 29), filed Novem-ber 24, 1962. Applicant: NEW YORKCONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYSCORPORATION, 1540 West MarketStreet, Akron 13, Ohio. Applicant's rep-resentative: E. R. Kershner, 715 -South25th Avenue, Bellwood, 111. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over regular routes,transporting: General commodities (ex-cept those of unusual value, Classes Aand B explosives, livestock, green hides,household goods as defined by the Com-mission, commodities in bulk and thoserequiring special equipment), servingOdenton, .Md., as an off-route point inconnection with applican's authorizedregular route operations.

NoTE: Common control may be involved.

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at theU.S. Appraisers' Stores Building, Balti-more, Md., before Joint Board No. 112.

No. MC 1449 (Sub-No. 3), filed October31, 1962. Applicant: MARC'S DELIV-ERY CORP., 931 East Sedgwick Street,Philadelphia, Pa. Applicant's attorney:Maxwell A. Howell, 600 Continental.Building, Washington-5, D.C. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,

transporting: (1) Such merchandise asis dealt in by retail department storesand mail-order houses; (2) empty con-tainers or other such incidental facilities(not specified) used in transporting thecommodities specified in this application;and (3) refused and damaged merchan-dise, between points in Falls Townshipand Tullytown, Pa., and points in NewJersey within fifty (50) miles thereof.

HEARING: January 16, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before Exam-iner Parks M. Low.

No. MC 1459 (Sub-No. 3), filed Oc-tober, 8, 1962. Applicant: ROYALMOTOR EXPRESS, INC., 410 W. SilverStreet, Lebanon, Ohio. Applicant's at-torney: Richard H. Brandon, HartmanBuilding, Columbus 15, Ohio. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: (1) Such equipment, ma-terials and supplies as are usually dealtin by gasoline and oil service stations(except commodities in bulk), andequipment and supplies, used by oil re-fineries and petroleum products inpackages, sold to consumers of suchproducts in semi-trailers, supplied byshipper, and. (2) frozen food, and sup-plies, used in the dispensing andservicing of frozen food at service sta-tions in refrigerated semi-trailers orcontainers supplied by shipper, betweenpoints in Ohio, on the one, hand, and,on the other,- points in Indiana andIllinois.NoTE: Applicant states the authority

sought in the proposed service wil belimited to service under contact with TheStandard Oil Company of Ohio and itswholly owned subsidiaries.

HEARING: January 11, 1962, at theNew Post Office Building, Columbus,Ohio, before Joint Board No. 58.

No. MC 1712 (Sub-No. 1), filed Oc-tober 28, 1962. Applicant: ELTIOTT-TRANSPORTATION, INC., '821 Mel-bourne Avenue, Cincinnati 29, Ohio.Applicant's attorney: Jack B. Josselson,Atlas Bank Building, Cincinnati 2, Ohio.Authority sought to operate as a con-tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: Paper, foil,cellulose film,- plastic fam and sheeting,other than cellulose, from Dayton, Ohio,to points in Montgomery, Butler, War-ren and Hamilton Counties, Ohio, andKenton and Campbell Counties, Ky., forincorporation into pool railroad cars fortransshipment to points beyond.NOTE: Applicant states the proposed

operations will be under a continuing con-tract or contracts with Specialty PapersCompany.


No. MC 2962 (Sub-No. 29), filed Sep-tember 28, 1962. Applicant: A & HTRUCK LINE INC., 1277 Maxwell Ave-nue, Evansville, Ind. Applicant's attor-ney: Howell Ellis, Suite 616-618 FidelityBuilding, 111 Monument Circle, Indian-apolis 4,.Ind. Authority sought, to oper-ate as a common carrier, by motor ve-

12014


hicle, over regular routes, transporting:General commodities, (except those ofunusual' value, Classes A and B explo-sives, household goods, as defined by theCommission, commodities in bulk, com-modities requiring special equipmentand those injurious or contaminating toother lading), between Jasper, Ind. andVincennes, Ind.; from Jasper over Indi-ana Highway 56 to junction IndianaHighway 61, thence over Indiana High-way 61 to Vincennes, and return over thesame route, serving no intermediatepoints.

HEARING: January 16, 1963, at Room908 Indiana Public Service Commission,New State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., be-fore Joint Board No. 21.

No. MC 2962 (Sub-No. 30), filed Octo-ber 5, 1962. Applicant: A. & H. TRUCKLINE, INC., 1277 Maxwell Avenue,Evansville, Ind. Applicant's attorney:Howell Ellis, Suite 616-618 FidelityBuilding, 111 Monument Circle, Indian-apolis 4, Ind. Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motor ve-hicle, over regular routes, transporting:General commodities (except those ofunusual value, Classes A and B explo-sives, household goods as defined by theCommission, commodities in bulk, andcommodities requiring special equip-ment), between Vincennes, Ind. andShoals, Ind.; from Vincennes over U.S.Highways 50 and 150 to Shoals, and re-turn over the same route, serving Shoals,Ind. and the intermediate point of Wash-ington, Ind. for the purpose of joinderonly.

HEARING: January 16, 1963, at Room908 Indiana Public Service CommissionNew State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., be-fore Joint Board No. 21.

No. MC 17829 (Sub-No. 5), filed Sep-tember 24, 1962. Applicant: DiSILVATRANSPORTATION, INC., 30 Middle-sex Avenue, Somerville, Mass. Appli-cant's attorney: Mary E. Kelley, 10 Tre-mont Street, Boston 8, Mass. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Such merchandise as isdealt in by wholesale, retail and chaingrocery and food business houses, andin connection therewith, equipment, ma-terials and supplies used in the conductof such businesses (except commoditiesin bulk, in tank vehicles), between Bos-ton and Springfield, Mass. and NorthHaven, Conn., on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in New York and NewJersey.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed op-eration will be under a continuing contractwith Stop & Shop, Inc. Applicant furtherstates duplications with existing authoritywill be eliminated.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theHotel Essex, Boston, Mass., before Ex-aminer Richard H. Roberts.

No. MC 30962 (Sub-No. 6), filed Octo-ber 21, 1962. Applicant: HUYCKTRUCKING COMPANY, INC., 123 EastClark Street, Ilion, N.Y. Applicant's at-torney: John J. Brady, Jr., 75 StateStreet, Albany 7, N.Y. Authority soughtto operate as a contract carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-

No. 235- 5

FEDERAL REGISTER

ing: Accounting, tabulating and comput-ing machines, crated, and parts of themachines described, crated, betweenUtica, N.Y., on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in the New York, N.Y.,commercial zone.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed op-erations are to be limited to a transportationservice to be performed under a continuingcontract, or contracts, with Remington Rand,Division of Sperry-Rand Corporation, NewYork, N.Y.


No. MC 32562 (Sub-No. 21), filed Oc-tober 30, 1962. Applicant: POINT EX-PRESS, INC., Box 10185 Station C,Charleston, W. Va. Applicant's attor-ney: Robert M. Pearce, 221/2 St. ClairStreet, Frankfort, Ky. Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by mo-tor vehicle, over regular routes, trans-porting: General commodities (exceptthose of unusual value, Classes A andB explosives, household goods as definedby the Commission, commodities in bulk,and those requiring special equipment),between Cincinnati, Ohio, and Lexing-ton, Ky.; (a) from Cincinnati over U.S.Highway 27 to Lexington, and returnover the same route, and (b) from Cin-cinnati over U.S. Highway 42 to junctionwith Interstate Highway 75; thence overInterstate Highway 75 to its termina-tion at Kentucky Highway 36 near Wil-liamstown, Ky.; thence over KentuckyHighway 36 to its junction with U.S.Highway 25 at Williamstown; thenceover U.S. Highway 25 to Lexington, andreturn over the same route, serving nointermediate points, as alternate routesfor operating convenience only in con-nection with applicant's regular-routeoperations.

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at theKentucky Hotel, Louisville, Ky., beforeJoint Board No. 37.

No. MC 33641 (Sub-No. 51), filed Oc-tober 22, 1962. Applicant: INTER-STATE MOTOR LINES, INC., 235 WestThird South, Salt Lake City 1, Utah.Applicant's attorney: Bruce Geernaert,100 Bush Street, San Francisco, Calif.Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over reg-ular routes, transporting: General com-modities (except those of unusual valueClasses A and B explosives, householdgoods as defined by the Commission,commodities in bulk, and those requiringspecial equipment), between Arlington,and Cairo Junction, Oreg., from Arling-ton, over U.S. Highway 30 to junctionOregon Highway 201, thence over Ore-gon Highway 201, to Cairo Junction andreturn over the same route, serving nointermediate points, as an alternateroute for operating convenience only.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed serv-ice will be restricted to shipments originatingat or destined to points presently served,lying west of Boise, Idaho, including Boise,Idaho.

HEARING: January 18, 1963, at theInterstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.172, or, if the. Joint Board waives its

12015

right to participate before ExaminerGordon M. Callow.

No. MC 41404 (Sub-No. 35), filed Sep-tember 30, 1962. Applicant: ARGO-COLLIER TRUCK LINES CORPORA-TION, P.O. Box 151, Fulton Highway,Martin, Tenn. Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Oleomargarine, shortening, lard,tallow, salad oils, salad dressings andtable sauces, in vehicles equipped withmechanical refrigeration, from Jackson-ville, Ill., to points in Alabama, Georgia,Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed op-eration will be restricted against transpor-tation of said commodities in liquid form intank vehicles.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at theU.S. Court Rooms and Federal Bldg.,,Springfield, Ill., before Examiner Wil-liam A. Royall.

No. MC 42487 (Sub-No. 568), filedOctober 17, 1962. Applicant: CONSOLI-DATED FREIGHTWAY CORPORA-TION OF DELAWARE, 175 LinfleldDrive, Menlo Park, Calif. Applicant'sattorney: R. E. Poelman (same addressas applicant). Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Acids, chemicals, chemical solu-tions, resins and glues in tank, bin, orhopper-type equipment, between pointsin Jackson County, Oreg., on the onehand, and on the other, points in Cali-fornia.

NOTE: Commor control may be involved.

HEARING: January 14, 1963, atthe Interstate Commerce CommissionHearing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Ave-nue, Portland Oreg., before Joint BoardNo. 11, or, if the Joint Board waives itsright to participate before ExaminerGordon M. Callow.

No. MC 52054 (Sub-No. 21) (AMEND-MENT), filed June 6, 1962, published inFEDERAL REGISTER issue of October 17,1962, amended November 23, 1962, andrepublished as amended, this issue. Ap-plicant: S & C TRANSPORT COMPANY,INC., 65 State Street, South Hutchinson,Kans. Applicant's attorney: James F.Miller, 500 Board of Trade, 10th andWyandotte, Kansas City 5, Mo. Author-ity sought to operate as a common car-rier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Salt based mineralmixtures, in bags, in containers and inblocks, in mixed loads with presentlyauthorized .shipments of salt and saltcompounds, from Wichita, Kans., topoints in Arkansas, Oklahoma and pointsin Cochran, Bailey, Randall, Roberts,Crosby, Swisher, Potter, Sherman, Wich-ita, Lubbock, Castro, Oldham, Dallam,Cottle, Hall, Gray, Ochiltree, Yoakum,Dickens, Briscoe, Carson, Hansford,Floyd, Collinsworth, Hartley, Foard,Kent, Terry, Motley, Childress, Wheeler,Lipscomb, Lamb, Armstrong, Hutchin-son, Wilbarger, .Lynn, Hale, Donley,Moore, Hockley, Parmer, Deaf Smith,Hemphill, Hardeman, and Garza Coun-ties, Tex.

NOTE: The purpose of this republicationis to clarify the commodities proposed to

1 - NOTICES- -

be transported and to delete the State ofNew Mexico as a destination state.

HEARING: Remains as assigned De-cember 17, 1962, at the Hotel Lassen,Wichita, Kans., before Examiner SamuelHorwich.

No. MC 52579 (Sub-No. 35), filedOctober 31, 1962. Applicant: GILBERTCARRIER CORP., 441 Ninth Avenue,New York, N.Y. Applicant's attorney:Harris J. Klein, 280 Broadway, NewYork 7, N.Y. Authority sought to oper-ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi-cle, over irregular routes, transporting:Wearing apparel oan hangers and inpackages, accessories, supplies, materials,and equipment, used in the conduct. ofwearing apparel stores, in mixed loadsin truckload lots, from points in the NewYork, N.Y., Commercial Zone andKearny, N.J., to points in Alabama, Ari-zona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,Michigan Minnesota, Mississippi, Mis-souri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, NewJersey, New Mexico, New York, NorthCarolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Okla-homa, Oregon, Pennsylvania, SouthCarolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, WestVirginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, andrefused, rejected and returned mer-chandise as specified above, on return.

NoTE: The applicant states the proposedservice will be restricted to movements toretail wearing apparel stores and its ware-houses. '

HEARING: January 16, 1963, at 346Broadway, New York, N.Y., before Ex-aminer Armin G. Clement.

No. MC 52709 (Sub-No. 179), filed July30, 1962. Applicant: RINGSBY TRUCKLINES, INC., 3201 Ringsby Court, Denyer5, Colo. Applicant's representative:Eugene St. M. Hamilton (same addressas applicant). Authority sought to oper-ate as b common carrier, by motor ve-hicle, over irregular routes, transporting:Resin plasticizer, in bulk, in tank vehi-cles, from St. Louis, Mo., to Denver, Colo.

NOTE: Applicant states it controls UnitedFreight, Inc., and Inter State Express, Inc.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at TheDenver Hilton, Denver, Colo., before Ex-aminer Dallas B. Russell.

No. MC 52917 (Sub-No. 46), filed Sep-tember 13, 1962. Applicant: CHESA-PEAKE MOTOR LINES, INC., 340 WestNorth Avenue, Baltimore 17, Md. Au-thority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Pizza pies, frozenfoods and processed foods, between Balti-more, Md., and Sunbury, Pa.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at Room709, U.S. Appraisers' Stores Bldg., Gayand Lombard Streets, Baltimore, Md.,before Examiner Lawrence A. Van Dyke,Jr.

No. MC 59940 (Sub-No. 3) (CORREC-TION), filed August 8, 1962, publishedFEDERAL REGISTER issue of October 31,1962, corrected November 27, 1962, andrepublished as corrected this issue. Ap".plicant: P. SALDUTTI & SON, INC.,Raymond Boulevard, Newark; N.J. Ap-plicant's representative: Bert Collins,

140 Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y. Au-thority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Cement, from theplant site of Atlantic Cement Company,Inc., Bayonne, N.J., to-points in Con-necticut, New Jersey, New York andPennsylvania within' 125 miles ofBayonne, N.J.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed oper-ations are to be limited to a transportationservice to be performed under a contract orcontinuing contracts with Atlantic CementCompany; Inc., New York, N.Y. The purposeof this republication is to show that Bayonneis located in New Jersey rather than in NewYork as shown in previous publication. ,

HEARING: Remains as assigned, De-cember 6,1962, at the Offices of the Inter-state Commerce Commission, Washing-ton, D.C., before Examiner David Waters.

No. MC 61403 (Sub-No. 81), filed June28, 1962. Applicant: THE MASON ANDDIXON TANK LINES, INC., EastmanRoad, Kingsport, Tenn. Applicant's at-torney: W. C. Mitchell, 140 Cedar Street,New York 6, N.Y. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Chemicals, in bulk, in tank:vehicles,from Lemont, Ill., and points in that areabetween Lemont and Willow Springs,IMi. (except Willow Springs), east ofthe Des Plaines River and north of Mc-Carthy Avenue and west of U.S. High-way 45, to points in Alabama, Arkansas,Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Ken-tucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi,North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, SouthCarolina, Tennessee, Texas (exceptpoints in Harris County), points in Vir-ginia, and West Virginia.

NoTE: Common control may be involved.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at thePick-Congress Hotel, 500 South MichiganAvenue, Chicago, Ill., before ExaminerSamuel C. Shoup.

No. MC 62133' (Sub-No. 8), filed Oc-tober 11; 1962. Applicant: EVANS EX-PRESS COMPANY, INC., 94 Van Guy-sling Avenue, Schenectady, N.Y. Appli-cant's attorney: John H. Brady, Jr., 75State Street, Albany 7, N.Y. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Compressed yeast, otherthan dry, malt and baking soda, in me-chanically controlled refrigerated vehi-cles, (1) from Belleville, N.J., to Kingstonand Monticello, N.Y., and (2) from Al-bany, N.Y., to Utica, N.Y., and returned,rejected and refused shipments of thesame commodities in (1) and (2) above,on return.

HEARING: January 22, 1963, at theFederal Building, Albany, N.Y., beforeExaminer Arnin G. Clement.

No. MC 64932 (Sub-No. 316), filed July10, 1962. Applicant: ROGERS CART-AGE CO., -a corporation, 1934 S. Went-worth Avenue, Chicago, Ill. Applicant'sattorney: David Axelrod, 39 South LaSalle Street, Chicago 3, Ill. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, in tankvehicles, from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Lou-isiana, Mo.

HEARING: January 9,-1963, at thePick-Congress Hotel, 500 South Mich-,

igan" Avenue, Chicago, Ill., before Ex-aminer Samuel C. Shoup.' -

No. MC 66562 (Sub-No. 1894), filedJune 22, 1962. Applicant: RAILWAYEXPRESS AGENCY, INCORPORATED,219 East 42d Street, New York 1,7, N.Y.Applicant's attorney: William H, Marx,219 East 42d Street, New York 17, N.Y.Authority sought to operate as avommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overregular routes, transporting: Generalcommodities, moving in express service,between Trenton, N.J. and Lansdale, andLower Providence Township, Pa,, as fol-lows: (1) From Trenton, N.J., over NewJersey Highway 69 to its junction withU.S. Highway 202; thence over U.S.Highway 202 to its junction with Penn-sylvania Highway 463; thence over Penn-sylvdaia Highway 463 -to its junctionwith Broad Street; thence over -BroadStreet to Lansdale, Pa., returning overthe same route, serving the intermediatepoint of Doylestown, Pa., (2) from thejunction of U.S. Highway 202 and Penn-sylvania Highway 313 over PennsylvaniaHighway 313 to the junction with U.S.Highway 611; thence over U.S. Highway611 to Plumstead Township, Pa. (BucksCounty); thence over U.S. Highway 611to junction U.S. Highway 202, and returnover the same route, (3) alternate routefrom Trenton, over New Jersey'Highway29 to junction U.S. Highway 202 toLambertville, N.J., returning over thesame route, (4) alternate route fromTrenton, over U.S. Highway 1 to junctionwith Pennsylvania Tdrnpike at Phila-delphia Interchange No. 28; thence overPennsylvania Turnpike to Willow GroveInterchange No. 27; thence over U.S.Highway 611 to junction with U.S. High-way 202 at Doylestown, Pa., returningover the same route, (5) from Trenton,N.J. over U.S. Highway 1 to junctionwith Pennsylvania Turnpike' at Phila-delphia Interchange No. 28; thence overPennsylvania Turnpike to NorristownInterchange No. 25; thence over U.S.Highway 422 to junction with Penn-sylvania Highway 363; thence overPennsylvania Highway 363 to LowerProvidence Township, Pa. (MontgomeryCounty), returning over the same route,(6) alternate route from junction U.S.Highway 422 and Pennsylvania Turn-pike, Norristown Interchange No. 25;thence over Pennsylvania Turnpike toValley Forge Interchange No. 24; thenceover Pennsylvania Highway 23 to junc-tion with Pennsylvania Highway 363;thence over Pennsylvania Highway 363to Lower Providence Township, return-ing over the same route.

NOTE- Applicant states its Doylestown, Pa.,office will be located in Plumstead Township,and its Norristown, Pa., office will be locatedin Lower- Providence Township:

RESTRICTION: Applicant states thatthe service -to be performed will belimited to that which is auxiliary to orsupplemental of express service, andshipments will be limited to those movingon through, bills of lading or expressreceipts..

HEARING: January 23, 1963, at Room321-B, U.S. Custom House Building, Sec-ond and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia,Pa., before Examiner Lawrence A. VanDyke, Jr.

12016


No. MC 66753 (Sub-No. 3), filed Sep-tember 24, 1962. Applicant: CHAINHAULAGE, INC., 15 Hastings Road,Lexington, Mass. Applicant's attorney:Mary E. Kelley, 10 Tremont Street, Bos-ton 8, Mass. Authority sought to oper-ate as a contract carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Such merchandise as is dealt inby wholesale, retail and chain groceryand food business houses, and in con-nection therewith, equipment, materialsand supplies used in the conduct of suchbusinesses (except commodities in bulkand in tank vehicles), between Bostonand Springfield, Mass., and North HavensConn., on the one hand, and, on theother, points in New York and NewJersey.

NOTE: Applicant states that duplicationswith existing authority will be eliminated.It Is further noted that the proposed opera-tions will be under a continuing contractwith Stop & Shop, Inc.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theHotel Essex, Boston, Mass., beforeExaminer Richard H. Roberts.

No. MC 72140 (Sub-No. 44), filed Octo-ber 12, 1962. Applicant: SHIPPERSDISPATCH, INC., 1216 West SampleStreet, South Bend, Ind. Applicant'sattorney: Ferdinand Born, 1017-19Chamber of Commerce Building, Indi-anapolis 4, Ind. Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over regular routes, transport-ing: General commodities (exceptClasses A and B explosives, householdgoods as defined in Practices of MotorCommon Carriers of Household Goods,17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, andthose requiring special equipment), be-tween Middlebury, Ind. and the junctionof Indiana Highway 13 and, U.S. High-way 20; over Indiana Highway 13, serv-ing the junction of Indiana Highway 13and U.S. Highway 20 as a point of joinderonly.

HEARING: January 14, 1963, at Room908 Indiana Public Service Commission,New State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., be-fore Joint Board No. 72.

No. MC 74303 (Sub-No. 2), filed Sep-tember 20, 1962. Applicant: JAMESCALABRO, doing business as VIN'STRUCKING COMPANY, 2580 EwenStreet, Bronx 63, New York, N.Y. Ap-plicant's representative: William D.Traub, 10 East 40th Street, New York16, N.Y. Authority sought to operate asa contract carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Suchmerchandise as is dealt in by wholesale,retail and chain grocery and food busi-ness houses, and, in connection there-with, equipment, materials and suppliesused in the conduct of such business,between Carlstadt, N.J., on the onehand, and, on the other, points in Nas-sau and Suffolk Counties, N.Y., and NewYork, N.Y.

NoTE: Applicant states that the proposedoperation will be under contract with See-man Brothers, Inc., or its affiliated com-panies, and it further states the purpose ofthis application Is to change the commoditydescription presently shown in applicant'sPermit MC 74303, from "groceries" to thedescription shown above, whIch is the al.

FEDERAL REGISTER

inclusive terminology which more correctlydefines the commodities transported by ap-plicant in his service as a contract carrierfor his contract shipper.


No. MC 77404 (Sub-No. 14), filed Sep-tember 4, 1962. Applicant: MOHAWKMOTOR, INC., 40 Harrison Street Tiffin,Ohio. Applicant's attorney: Taylor C.Burneson, 3430 Leveque-Lincoln Tower,Fifty West Broad Street, Columbus 15,Ohio. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overregular routes, transporting: Generalcommodities, (excdpt those of unusualvalue, Classes A and B explosives, house-hold goods as defined by the Commission,commodities in bulk, commodities re-quiring special equipment, and those in-jurious or contaminating to other lad-ing), between Piqua, Ohio and India-napolis, Ind., from Piqua, over U.S. High-way 36, to Indianapolis, and return overthe same route, serving no intermediatepoints, as an alternate route, for operat-ing convenience only, in connection withapplicant's authorized regular route op-erations between Cleveland, Ohio, De-troit, Mich., and Indianapolis, Ind.


No. MC 82101 (Sub-No. 4), filed Octo-ber 24, 1962. Applicant: WESTWOODCARTAGE, INC., 62 Everett Street,Westwood, Mass. Applicant's attorney:Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 182 ForbesBuilding, Forbes Road (At South ShorePlaza), Braintree 84, Mass. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Such merchandise as isdealt in by wholesale, retail and chaingrocery and food business houses, andin connection therewith, equipment,materials and supplies used in the con-duct of such business (except commodi-ties in bulk, in tank vehicles), and re-turned and damaged shipments of theabove described commodities, betweenBoston and Springfield, Mass., and NorthHaven, Conn., on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in New York and NewJersey.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed opera-tions will be under a continuing contractwith Stop & Shop, Inc. Applicant also statesthat duplications with existing authority areto be eliminated.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theHotel Essex, Boston, Mass., beforeExaminer Richard H. Roberts.

No. MC 89861 (Sub-No. 10), filed Octo-ber 19, 1962. Applicant: GOUVER-NEUR TRUCKING, INC., Gouverneur,N.Y. Applicant's representative: Ray-mond A. Richards, P.O. Box 25, Webster,N.Y. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Tale,from Hailesboro (St. Lawrence County),N.Y., and points within 25 miles ofHailesboro, to New York, N.Y., and pointsin Massachusets, New Jersey, Ohio andPennsylvania, and empty containers orother such incidental facilities (notspecified), used in transporting the abovedescribed commodities, on return.

12017

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at theFederal Building, Syracuse, N.Y., beforeExaminer James A. McKiel.

No. MC 89861 (Sub-No. 11), filed No-vember 7, 1962. Applicant: GOUVER-NEUR TRUCKING, INC., Antwerp Road,Box 114, Gouverneur, N.Y. Applicant'srepresentative: Raymond A. Richards,35 Curtice Park, P.O. Box 25, Webster,N.Y. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Talc, be-tween Hailesboro (St. Lawrence County),N.Y. and Emeryville (St. LawrenceCounty), N.Y.


No. MC 90373 (Sub-No. 21), filed No-vember 21, 1962. Applicant: C & RTRUCKING CO., a corporation, InmanAvenue, Avenel, N.J. Applicant's attor-ney: Milton E. Diehl, 1383 NationalPress Building, Washington 4, D.C. Au-thority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Asphalt, in bulk,from Perth Amboy, N.J., to Hazleton,Muncy, Scranton and Wysox, Pa., andrefused and rejected shipments of theabove described commodities, on return.

HEARING: January 4, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate CommerceCommission, Washington, D.C., beforeExaminer Reece Harrison.

No. MC 94170 (Sub-No. 4), filed Sep-tember 17, 1962. Applicant: WILL MF. MADDEN, doing business as MAD-DEN'S TRANSFER, 12 Lake FlowerAvenue, Saranac Lake, N.Y. Applicant'sattorney: John J. Brady, Jr., 75 StateStreet, Albany 7, N.Y. Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: (a) Equipment and materials usedin the construction, maintenance andrepair of telephone and electric powersystems when for emergency installa-tion or emergency repairs only (requir-ing the use of special equipment, namely,flat bed trucks or trailers equipped withwinches; low bed trailers and pole trail-ers), between points in St. Lawrence,Franklin, Clinton, Essex, Hamilton,Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Warrenand Washington Counties, N.Y., on theone hand, and, on the other, points inMaine, New Hampshire, Vermont,Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Is-land, New Jersey, New York, Pennsyl-vania, Delaware, Maryland and Ohio,(b) boats (transportation of which re-quires special equipment, as indicatedabove) between points in Clinton, Essex,St. Lawrence and Franklin Counties,N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other,points in Maine, Vermont, NewHampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,Rhode Island, New Jersey, New Yorkand Pennsylvania, and (c) householdgoods, as defined in Practices of MotorCommon Carriers of Household Goods,17 M.C.C. 467, between points in St.Lawrence, Clinton, Essex, Franklin andHamilton Counties, N.Y., on the onehand, and, on the other, points in Con-necticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland,Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York,Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia,West Virginia, Indiana, Maine, Michi-

gan, New Hampshire,. Rhode Island, No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 474),.filed Oc- 31, 1962, and republished as correctedNorth Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, tober 25, 1962. Applicant: WATKINS-2 this issue. Applicant: J. H. ALLEN, 808Georgia and the District of Columbia. MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Road,' East, Main Street, Roanoke, Ala. Appli-

NoTE: Applicant states It already has con- Thomasville, Ga. Applicant's attorne : cant's'attorneys: J.Haden Alldredge, Hillsiderable authority in the transportation of Duane W. Acklie, Box 2028, Lincoln, Building, Montgomery, Ala., and R. S.said household goods. Applicant is not seek- Nebr. Authority sought to operate -as a. Richard, 57 Adams Avenue,.Montgomery,Ing any duplicating rights- herein. He pro- common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Ala. Previous notice of publication in-,poses by this application to increase the irregular routes, transporting: Meat, cluded a note stating that applicant.radius on household goods of 40 miles of meat products, meat by-products, dairy holds common carrier authority in MCSaranac Lake in New York State to approxi-mately 65 miles, but has defined the radius products and articles distributed by meat 103721 and 2 Subs. The words "and 2area by definite county lines. He also seeks packing houses, as described by the Corn- Subs" should be eliminated, as thoseauthority in some additional states. Appli mission in 61 M.C.C. 209, from Sioux words were in error. Correctly stated,.cant holds contract carrier authority in City; Iowa, to points in Connecticut,. the note should have read: "ApplicantMC 101915, therefore dual operations may be Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, holds common carrier authority in MCinvolved. Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hamp- 103271; therefore, dual operations may

HEARING: January 21, 1963, at the shire, New, Jersey, New York, Pennsyl- be involved."Federal Building, Albany, N.Y., before vania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Ver- HEARING: Remains as assigned De-Examiner Armin G. Clement. mont and Virginia. - cember 11, 1962, at the U.S. CourtRooms,

No.'MC 94341 jSub-No. 4),-flled Octo- HEARING: January 21, 1963, at the Montgomery, Ala., before Joint Boardber 25, 1962. Applicant: THOMAS B. Offices of the Interstate Commerce Corn- No. 157, or, if the Joint Board waives itsFERGUSON, doing business as FER- mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex- right to participate, before ExaminerGUSON TRUCKING, P.O. Box 246, aminer Bernard J. Hasson, Jr.. Allen W. Hagerty.Darlington, Pa. Applicant's attorney: No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 475), filed Oc- No. MC 103993 (Sub-No. 169), filedArthur J. Diskin, 302 Frick Building, tober -25, 1962. Applicant: WATKINS October 8, 1962. Applicant:- MORGANPittsburgh 19, Pa. Authority sought to MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, DRIVE-AWAY,-INC., 500 Equity-Build-operate as a common carrier, by motor Thomasville, Ga. Applicant's attorney: ing, Elkhart, Ind. Applicant's attorney:vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- Joseph H. Blackshear, Gainesville, Ga. John E. Lesow, 3737 North Meridianing: Sand, gravel, slag, stone, and cin- Authority sought to operate as a corn- Street, Indianapolis 8, Ind. Authorityders, in dump vehiclesfrom plant sites mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir- sought to operate as a common carrier,of plants owned or controlled by Stand- regular routes, transporting:- Frozen by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,ard Slag Co., in Mahoning, Stark, Trui- foods, from Wethersfield, Conn., to transporting: Frames for trailers de-bull, and Portage Counties, Ohio, to points in Virginia and West.Virginia. signed to be drawn by passenger auto-points in Lawrence, Beaver, -Mercer, HEARING: January 14, 1963, at the mobiles,'frdm points-in Florida to pointsCrawford, o Venango, Butler, and Alle- Offices of the Interstate Commerce Corn- in the United States, including Alaska,gheny Counties, Pa.; and -(2) -sand, mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex- but excluding Hawaii, and rejected ship.-grapel, slag, stone, and cinders, in dump aminer A. Lane Cricher. - ments of the above-specifiedocomm6dityvehicles, from plant sites of plants owned No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 476), filed Oc- on return movements.or controlled -by Standard Slag Co., in tobei 25, '1962. Applicant: WATKINS HEARING: January 10, 1962, at theLawrence, Mercer, Beaver, and Alle- MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, 'U.S. Court Rooms,. Tampa, Fla., befor&gheny Counties, Pa., to points in Ma- Thomasville, Ga. Applicant's attorney: Examiner Charles 9. Beinemann.honing, 'Trumbull, Portage, Stark and Joseph H. Blackshear, Gainesville, Ga. No.-IVC 104128'(Sub-No. 88), filed Oc-Columbiana Counties, Ohio. Authority sought to operate as a cor- tober 29,1962. Applicant: CAMPBEL

HEARING: January 8, 1963, at the mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir- SERVICE, a corporation, 2720 River Avb-,,New Post Office Building, Columbus, regular routes, transporting: Froze'z nue, South San Gabriel, Calif., Appli-m-Ohio, before Joint Board No. 59. - foods, from Pittsburgh and Saltsburg, cant's attorn0y: R. Y. :Schuremani, 1010

No. MC 95540 - (Sub-No. 441.),- filed Pa., to points in Connecticut, Maine,, Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles 17,-Calif.,July 12, 1962. Applicant: WATKINS Magsachusett% New Jersey, New York, Authority sought to operate as a commonMOTOR LINES, INC., -Albany Highway, Rhode Island, and Vermont. . carrier, by motor vehidle, over irregularThomasville, Ga. Applicant's attorney: HEARING: January 16, 1963, at the routes, transporting: Trailers, designedJoseph H. Blackshear, Gainesville, Ga. Offices of the Interstate Commerce Corn- to be drawn by passenger automobiles, in -

Authority sought to operate as a common mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex- initial movements, in fruckaway serv-carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular aminer Alfred B. Hurley. ice, from points in Santa Clara County,route's, transporting: Frozen foods, from, No. MC 100463 (Sub-No. 19), filed Calif. (except the City of Santa Clara), -Fort Wayne, Ind., to points in Georgia, October 4, 1962. Applicant: SMITH to points in Colorado, Kansas,, Montana,North Carolina, South Carolina, and TRANSPORT (U.S.) LIMITED, Suite -Nebraska, .Ne* Mexico, North Dakota,Tennessee. 1310, Prudential Building, King and South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming.S o aYoung Streets, Toronto, Ont., Canada. HEARING: January 16, 1963, at the.Nors: Common control may be involved. Applicant's representative: Charles H. New Mint Building, 133 Hermann Street,

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at the Trayford, 220 East 42d Street New York San Francisco, Calif., before ExaminerPick-Congress Hotel, 500 South Mich- 17, N.Y. Authority sought to operate as F. Roy idnn.igan Avenue, Chicago, Ill., before Exam- a common carri'r, by motor vehicle, over ' No. MC 104896 (Sub-No. 8), filed Octo-iner Samuel C. Shoup. irregular routes, transporting: Alumi- ber -25, -1962. Applicant: WOMEL-

No MC 95540 (Sub-No. 462), filed Sep- num ingots, products, foil, articles, scrap DORF, INC., P.O.. Box -232, -Lewistown,tember 10, 1962., Applicant: WATKINS and waste, and rolldd alumiiium, flat or Pa. Applicant's attorney: V. BakerMOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Road, in coils, between the'plant site of Alroll, Smith, 2107 Fidelity-Philadelphia TrustThomasville, Ga. Applicant's attorney: Inc., at Alroll, Town of Scriba, N.Y., on Building, Philadelphia 9,_Pa. Authority-.Duane W. Acklie, Box 2028, Lincoln, the one hand, knd, on the other, the port sought to operate as a common carrier,Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a' of enty on the International Boundary by motor, vehicle, over irregular routes,common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Lin& betwvee the United States and Can-" transporting: Commodities, such as areirregular routes, transporting:' Meats, ada located at AlexandriaBay, N..Y, dbalt in by-chain retail.variety stores-meat products, meat by-products and NoTr:.Applicant states the proposed service and material, equipment an d suppliesarticles distributed by meat - packing will be restrictid to shipments originating at used in ,the conduct ofsuch business,houses, from Boise, Idaho and points or destined to points in Canada. , from the site of the G. C. Murphy Cor-within 50 miles thereof to points in Ari- ro -G C

HEARING: January -14 1963, at 346 pany warehouse at.McKeesport, Pa., to

and txaas. Broadway, New York, N.Y.,-before Exam- Trenton and.Mercerville, N.J.,-t3oints inHEARING: January 11, 1963, at the iner Armtin G. Clement. - Cumberland County, N.J., and New'

Public ' Utilities Commissibn, 'State No. MC 102174 (Sub-No. 3) (CORREC- Rodhelle, N.. "House, Boise, Idaho, before Exaniiner - TION), filed- September,4, 1962, pub- HEARING., January 15, 1963, at the'Gordon M. Callow. " lished'FEDERAL REGISTER,iSsUe of ctolier Ofdes of the6iitestatedCommnerce Corn-

12018 .NOTICES, ":"


mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex-aminer Samuel Horwich.

No. MC 106943 (Sub-No. 78), filedOctober 21,1962. Applicant: EASTERNEXPRESS, INC., 1450 Wabash Avenue,Terre Haute, Ind. Applicant's attorney:John E. Lesow, 3737 North MeridianStreet, Indianapolis 8, Ind. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over regular routes,transporting: General commodities, (ex-cept Classes A and B explosives, live-stock, grain, petroleum products in bulk,household goods as defined by the Com-mission, and commodities requiring spe-cial equipment), (1) between Evansville,Ind. and Terre Haute, Ind., serving theintermediate point of Vincennes, Ind.:from Evansville over U.S. Highway 41 toTerre Haute, and return over the sameroute.

NoTn: Applicant states the route describedimmediately above is restricted to trafficmoving between Evansville on the one hand,and, on the other, points on said carrier'sregular routes east of the Ohio-PennsylvaniaState line.

(The purpose of this application is toclarify the authority to perform serviceto or from Vincennes over this routepresently reflected on sheet No. 6 of Cer-tificate MC 106943, October 20, 1958).(2) Between Effinghom,, Ill., and New-ton, Ill., serving no intermediate points:from Effingham over Illinois Highway 33to Newton, and return over the sameroute, and (3) between Greenup, Ill. andOlney, 3ll., serving the intermediate pointof Newton, Ill.: from Greenup over Illi-nois Highway 130 to Olney, and returnover the same route.

HEARING: January 15, 1963, at Room908, Indiana Public Service Commission,New State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., be-fore Joint Board No. 1.

No. MC 106997 (Sub-No. 6), filed Octo-ber 5,1962. Applicant: ARTHUR PIER-SON, 119 Water Street, Newton, N.J.Applicant's representative: George A. Ol-sen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City 6,N.J. Authority sought to operate as acontract carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: (1) Pho-tographic raw paper, from Vicksburg,Mich., to Newton, N.J., and (2) sensi-tized photographic paper, from Newton,N.J., to Chicago, Ill.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed sarv-ice will be under continuing contract withAnken Chemical & Film Corp., Newton, N.J.Applicant holds common carrier authority InMC 108035; therefore, dual operations maybe involved.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at Room321-B, U.S. Customs House Building,Second and Chestnut Streets, Philadel-phia, Pa., before Examiner Arniin G.Clement.

No. MC 107107 (Sub-No.- 220), filedJune 14, 1962. Applicant: ALTERMANTRANSPORT LINES, INC., P.O. Box 65,Allapattah Station, Miami 42, Fla. Au-thority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Aluminum buildingmaterials, glazed and unglazed, frompoints in Dade County, Fla. and Holly-wood, Fla. and points within five (5)miles thereof, to Miami, Fla.

FEDERAL REGISTER

Norn: Applicant states the purpose of thisapplication is to serve additional originpoints to the same destinations as now au-thorized from Miami, Fla.

HEARING: January 23, 1963, at theDupont Plaza Hotel, 300 Biscayne Boule-vard Way, Miami, Fa., before JointBoard No. 205, or, if the Joint Boardwaives its right to participate beforeExaminer Charles B. Heinemann.

No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 234), filedAugust 27, 1962. Applicant: ALTER-MAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., P.O.Box 65, Aliapattah Station, Miami 42,Fla. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Cannedfruits and canned fruit juices, in con-tainers, from points in Florida to pointsin West Virginia and Kentucky.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at theU.S. Court Rooms, Tampa, Fla., beforeExaminer Charles B. Heinemann.

No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 235), filedSeptember 10, 1962. Applicant: ALTER-MAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., P.O.Box 65, Allapattah Station, Miami 42,Fla. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Citrusproducts, not canned and not frozen,from points in Florida to points in NorthDakota.

HEARING: January 21, 1963, at theDuPont Plaza Hotel, 300 Biscayne Boule-vard Way, Miami, Fla., before ExaminerCharles B. Heinemann.

No. MC 107643 (Sub-No. 61), filedAugust 14, 1962. Applicant: ST. JOHNSMOTOR EXPRESS CO., a corporation,7220 North Burlington Avenue, Portland,Oreg. Applicant's attorney: William Q.Marshall, Central Building, Seattle 4,Wash. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Acids,chemicals, and chemical solutions, inbulk, and empty containers or other suchincidental facilities (not specified) usedin transporting the above-specified com-modities, between points in Washington.

HEARING: January 21, 1963, at theFederal Office Building, Seattle, Wash.,before Joint Board No. 80, or, if the JointBoard waives its right to participate be-fore Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

No. .MC 107643 (Sub-No. 62), filedOctober 9, 1962. Applicant: ST. JOHNSMOTOR EXPRESS CO., a corporation,7220 North Burlington Avenue, Portland,Oreg. Applicant's attorney: John G.McLaughlin, Pacific Building, Portland4, Oreg. Authority sought to operate asa common carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Acids,chemicals, chemical solutions, resins andglues, in tank, bin and hopper equipment,between points in Jackson County, Oreg.,on the one hand, and, on the other,points in California.

HEARING: January 14, 1963, at the'Interstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.11, or, if the Joint Board waives its rightto participate before Examiner GordonM. Callow.

No. MC 107983 (Sub-No. 5), filed Au-gust 20, 1962. Applicant: COLD-WAYEXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 23, Morton,Ill. Applicant's attorney: Mack Ste-

12019

phenson, 208 East Adams Street, Spring-field, Ill. Authority sought to operateas a contract carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: (1)Ice cream, ice milk, sherbet, water icesand vegetable fat frozen desserts, in con-tainers, in vehicles, equipped with tem-perature control devices, from Peoria,Ill., to Hammond, Ind., and Kansas Cityand St. Louis, Mo., (2) sour cream, sourcream mixtures, imitation cream,. fla-vored milk, low fat milk, liquid dietaryfoods, fruit egments, ice cream mix,orange juice, fruit juice drinks, cottagecheese and other dairy products, as de-scribed in Part B of Appendix I to the re-port in Ex Parte MC-45, Descriptions inMotor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209and 766, in containers, in vehiclesequipped with temperature control de-vices, between Peoria, Ill., and St. Louis,Mo., (3) ice cream novelties, includingwater ice bars, fudge bars, ice creamsandwiches, cake rolls, bars, pies andcups, and articles of a like nature, in con-tainers, in vehicles equipped with tem-perature control devices, from Hunting-ton, Ind., to Peoria, Ill., and St. Louis,Mo., and (4) containers, between Clin-ton, Iowa, on the one hand, and, on theother, St. Louis, Mo., and points in Il-linois.

NOTE: Applicant states that it will trans-port empty containers or other such inciden-tal facilities (not specified) used in connec-tion with the commodities described in (1),(2), (3) and (4) above on return.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theU.S. Court Rooms and Federal Building,Springfield, Ill., before Examiner Wil-liam A. Royall.

No. MC 108053 (Sub-No. 45), fled No-vember 13, 1962. Applicant: LITTLEAUDREY'S TRANSPORTATION COM-PANY, INC., P.O. Box 709, Fremont,Nebr. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Meats,meat products, meat byproducts and

articles distributed by meat packing-houses, from Boise, Idaho, and pointswithin fifty (50) miles thereof, to pointsin Arizona, California, Nevada, NewMexico and Texas.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at thePublic Utilities Commission State House,Boise, Idaho, before Examiner GordonM. Callow.

No. MC 108340 (Sub-No. 17), filed No-vember 7, 1962. Applicant: -ANEYTRUCK LINE, a corporation, 2219 CedarStreet, Forest Grove, Oreg. Applicant'sattorney: Lawrence V. Smart, Jr., 2010Northwest Vaughn Street, Portland 9,Oreg. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Sugar, inbags and tote bins, from points in Yak-ima County, Wash., to points in Wash-ington County, Oreg., and empty con-tainers or other such incidental facilities(not specified) used in transporting theabove described commodities, and dam-aged and refused shipments, on return.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at theInterstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.45, or, if the Joint Board waives its right

NOTICES

to participate before Examiner GordonM. Callow.

No. MC 109637 (Sub-No. 214), filedOctober 1, 1962. Applicant: SOUTH-ERN TANK LII[ES, INC., 4107 BellsLane, Louisville, 11, Ky. Authority.sought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregqlar routes,transporting: Cement, in bulk and inpackages, between points in Kentucky.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at 1:00p.m., at the Kentucky Hotel, Louisville,Ky., before Joint Board No. 105.

No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 537), filedOctober 30, 1962. Applicant: CHEMI-CAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown,Pa. Applicant's attorneys: Ronald N.Cobert and Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, Mun-sey Building, Washington 4, D.C. Au-thority sought to operate as a dommoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Cotton softener, inbulk, in tank vehicles, from Cincinnati,Ohio, to Calhoun, Tenn.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at theNew Post Office Building, Columbus,Ohio, before, Joint Board No. 209.

No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 541), filedNovember 27, 1962. Applicant: CHEM-ICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown,Pa. Applicant's attorney: Leonard A.Jaskiewicz, Munsey Building, Washing-ton 4, D.C. Authority sought to oper-ate as a common carrier, by motor ve-hicle, over irregular routes, transporting:Flourspar, dry, in bulk, from Wilming-ton, Del., to points in New Jersey, NewYork, Maryland, Pennsylvania, WestVirginia and North Carolina.

HEARING: December 13, 1962, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex-aminer Raymond V. Sar.

No, MC 110563-(Sub-No. 17), filed Sep-tember 21, 1962. Applicant: COLD-WAY FOOD EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box259, Sidney, Ohio. Applicant's attor-ney: Joseph M. Scanlan, 111 West Wash-ington Street, Chicago 2, Ill. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: (1) Canned goods, tablesauces and condiments, from points inChester County, Pa., and Wilmington,Del., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Ken-tucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio andWisconsin, and (2) frozen fresh mush-rooms, from points, in Lancaster andChester Counties, Pa., to points in Illi-nois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Mis-souri, Ohio and Wisconsin.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at Room321-B, U.S. Custom House -Building,Second" and Chestnut Streets, Philadel-phia, Pa., before Examiner Armin G.Clement.

No. MC 110625 (Sub-No. 6), filed Oc-tober 25, 1962, Applicant: CLARENCEVOGT, doing business as'VOGT TRANS-FER & STORAGE _CO., 63 East IdahoAvenue, Ontario, Oreg. Authorityrought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Dry chemical fertilizer, inbulk tank type equipment, betweenpoints in Malheur and Harney Counties,Oreg., -on.the one hand, and, on the

other, points in Idaho, south of the tation Building, Washington 6, D.C.Salmon River. Authority sought to operate as a com-

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at the mon carrier, by motor 'vehicle, over ir-Public Utilities Commission, State House, regular routes, transporting: Dry com-Boise, Idaho, before Joint Board No. 81, modities, in bulk, (1) between Newor, if the Joint Board waives its right to Orleans, La., and points within 75 milesparticipate before Examiner -Gordon M. thereof, on the one hand, and, on theCallow. other, points in the United States, in-

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 73), filed Oe- eluding Alaska, and (2) between Orange,teber 24, 1962. -Applicant: KAIVIP0 Tex., and points within 75 miles thereof,TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street WestT on the one hand, and, on the other,Neenah, Wis. Applicant's attorney: E. points in the United States, includingStephen Heisley, Transportation Build- Alaska.ing, Washington 6, D.C. Authority NoTE: The purpose of this republication Is

* sought to operate as a common carrier, to-clarify that New Orleans, La., Is includedby motor vehicle, over irregular routes, in the proposed area of 75 miles thereof intransporting: Washing and cleaning (1) above, and that Orange, Tex., is includedcompounds, in bulk, in tank vehicles, in the proposed area of 75 miles thereof infrom South Beloit and Chicago, Ill., to (2) above.Pine Bluff, Ark., Chattanooga, Tenn., HEARING: Remains as assigned De-and Coosa Pines, Ala. - cember 10, 1962, at the Roosevelt Hotel,

Hearing: January 11, 1963, at'-the New Orleans, La., before ExaminerOffices of the Interstate Commerce" James.O'D. Moran. This assignment isCommission, Washington, D.C., before for applicant's presentation only.Examiner Reece Harrison. No. MC 112617 (Sub-No 125), filed

No. MC 111397 (Sub-No. 49), filed August 20, 1962. Applicant: LIQUIDNovember 19, 1962. Applicant:' DAVIS TRANSPORTERS, INC., P.O. Box 5135,TRANSPORT INC., 1345 South Fourth Cherokee Station, Louisville 5, Ky. Ap-Street, Paducah, Ky.- Applicant's at- plicant's attorneys: Leonard A. Jaskie-torney: Herbert S. Melton, Jr., Suite wicz and Ronald N. Colbert, Munsey215, Katterjohn Building, Paducah, Ky. Building, Washington 4, D.C. AuthorityAuthority sought to operate as a com- sought to operate as a common carrier,mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir- by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,regular routes, transporting: Clay, air- transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, in tankfloated or otherwise, crude, dried, vehicles, from Lemont, Ill., and points incrushed or compacted, in tank or hopper that area between Lemont and Willowtype vehicles, in bulk, from points in Springs, Ill.' (except Willow Springs),Henry and Weakley Countie., Tenn., and east of Des Plaines River and north ofpoints in Graves and'Calloway Counties, McCarthy Avenue and west of U.S.Ky., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Highway 45, to points in Alabama, Ar-Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, kansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida,Missi ssippi, Missouri, Indiana, Illinois, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,Kansas,Texas, West Virginia, South Carolina, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,

-North Carolina and Tennessee, and Massachusetts,- Michigan, Minnesota,empty containers or -other such inci- Mississippi, Missouri, -Nebraska, Newdental facilities (not specified) used in Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,transporting the above described cori- North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio,modities, on return. 2 Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,HEARING: November 29, 1963, at the- South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennes-

Dinkier-Andrew Jackson Hotel, Nash- see, Texas (except points in Harrisylle, Tenn., before Examiner WilliamfR. County), Vermont, Virginia, West Vir-Tyers. ginia, and Wiscohsin.No. MC 111940 (Sub-No.: 34), fled No- HEARING: January 7, 1963, at The

vember 1, 1962. Applicant: SMITH'S Pick-Congress Hotel, 500 South Michi-- TRUCK LINES, a corporation, P.O. Box, A gan Avenue, . Chicago, Ill., before Ex-88, M ncy, Pa . Applicant's attorney: aminer Samuel C. Shoup. •John M. M~usselman, 400 North"Third No. MC 112963 (Sub-No. 10), filedStreet,- P.O. Box 581, Harrisburg, Pa. October 10, 1962. Applicant: ROYAuthority sought to operate as', a com- BROS., INC., Boston Road, Pinehurst,mon carrier by motor vehicle, over ir- Mass. Applicant's attorney: S. Harrisonregular routes, transporting: Calcium Kahn, 1110-14 Investment Building,chloride, in bulk, (1) between points in Washington, D.C. Authority sought toPennsylvania, and (2) beteen points, operate as a common carrier, by motorin Pennsylvania, on the one hand, -and, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport-on the other, points in New Jersey, Dela- ing: Methyl esters in bulk, intank ye-ware, Maryland -and the District of hicles, from Rochester, N.Y., to Boston,Columbia. Mass.

HEARING: January 14, 1963, at the HEARING, January 9, 1963, at thePennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Hotel Essex, Bostoi, Mass., before Ex-Harrisburg, Pa.,-before Examiner Law- aminer Richard H. Roberts.rence A. Van Dyke, Jr. 1 - i- No. MC 113267 (Sub-No. 79), filed Oc-

No. MC -112497 (Sub-No. 194) ( tober 15,- 1962., Applicant: CENTRAL &FICATION), filed November 6, 1962, SOUTHERN TRUCK LINES, INC., 312published issue November 15, 1962; clari- West Morris Street, Caseyville, Ill. Ap-fied November 23, 1962, and republished plicant's representative: F'red H. Figgeas clarified this issue. Applicant: (same address as applicant). AuthorityHEARIN TANK LINES, INC., P.O. Box sought to operate as a common carrier,3096, 6440 -Rawlins Street, Istrouman by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,Branch, Baton Rouge, La. Applicant's transporting: Frozen foods, from Mat-attorney: Harry C. Ames, Jr.,- Transpor- toon, Ill. to points in Alabama, Arizona,

12020


Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida,Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minne-sota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana,Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, NorthCarolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon,South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennes-see, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington,West Virginia, and Wyoming.

NoTE: Applicant states that its officers areofficers and stockholders in the followingmotor carriers of passengers, their baggage,newspapers, and express; Industrial BusLines, Inc., MC 114168, Vandalia Bus Lines,Inc., MC 2698. In addition thereto, Oliverand Kathryn Anderson are officers and stock-holders in CaseyvUle Bus Line, Inc., MC110845.


No. MC 113666 (Sub-No. 13), filed Oc-tober 25, 1962. Applicant: FREEPORTTRANSPORT, INC., Box 215, Freeport,Pa. Applicant's attorney: Arthur J.Diskin, 302 Frick Building, Pittsburgh19, Pa. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Fabri-cated iron and steel joists and other ironand steel building materials, from theplant site of Raychord Corp., Appollo(Armstrong County) Pa., to points inOhio, West Virginia, Michigan, Indiana,Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Wisconsin,New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Vir-ginia, District of Columbia, NorthCarolina, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Con-necticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, NewHampshire, and Maine, and empty con-tainers or other such incidental facilities(not specified) used in transporting thecommodities specified above, on return.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex-aminer Lacy W. Hinely.

No. MC 113843 (Sub-No. 56), filed No-vember 8, 1962. Applicant: REFRIGER-ATED FOOD EXPRESS, INC., 316Summer Street, Boston, Mass. Author-ity sought to operate as a common car-rier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Frozen foods, andessence of fruit and berries, from pointsin New York located on and west of aline beginning at Oswego, N.Y., and ex-tending along New York Highway 57 toSyracuse, N.Y., and thence along U.S.Highway 11 to the New York-Pennsyl-vania State Line and Lake City, Pa., topoints in Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois,Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Ne-braska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, SouthDakota, Texas and Wisconsin, and re-turned, rejected, and refused shipmentsof the above-specified commodities onreturn.

NotE: Common control may be involved.HEARING: January 11, 1963, at the

Federal Building, Syracuse, N.Y., beforeExaminer James A. McKiel.

No. MC 113855 (Sub-No. 74) filed No-vember 21, 1962. Applicant: INTERNA-TEONAL TRANSPORT, INC., Highway52 South, Rochester, Minn. Applicant'sattorney: Franklin J. Van Osdel, FirstNational Bank Building, Fargo, N. Dak.

FEDERAL REGISTER

Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: (A) SelfPropelled sweepers and chipping ma-chines (for chipping and pulverizingsuch materials as brush and tree limbs)from Pomona, Calif., to points in theUnited States (except points in Alaska,Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, Idaho,California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Ari-zona, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma,Arkansas and Louisiana), and (B) cut-ting machines (for cutting, trimmingand mdwing brush, grass, trees etc.),from Pomona, Calif., to points in Mon-tana, Wyoming, Minnesota and Kansas.

HEARING: December 11, 1962, at theFederal Building, Los -Angeles, Calif.,before Examiner F. Roy Linn.

No. MC 114290 (Sub-No. 9), filed Au-gust 29, 1962. Applicant: EXLEY EX-PRESS, INC., 2204 Southeast EighthAvenue, Portland 14, Oreg. Applicant'sattorney-: James T. Johnson, 609-11 Nor-ton Building, Seatle 4, Wash. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Frozen foods, from pointsin Yakima County, Wash., and LinnCounty, Oreg., to Phoenix, Ariz., andexempt commodities, on return.

HEARING: January 28, 1963, at theFederal Office Building, Seattle, Wash.,before Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

No. MC 114312 (Sub-No. 6), filed Octo-ber 15, 1962. Applicant: WILLIAM F.ABBOTT, doing business as BILL AB-BOTT GRAIN COMPANY, 202 ElmwoodStreet, Delta, Ohio. Applicant's attor-ney: John P. McMahon, 44 East BroadStreet, Columbus 15, Ohio. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Fertilizer, (other than bulkliquid fertilizer in tank vehicles) pallets,containers, bags and other facilities, be-tween- Fort Wayne, Ind., and points inMichigan and Ohio.


No. MC 115212 (Sub-No. 4), filed Sep-tember 26, 1962. Applicant: H. M. H.MOTOR SERVICE, a corporation, P.O.Box 472, Jamesburg, N.J. Applicant'sattorney: Morton E. Kiel, 140 CedarStreet, New York 6, N.Y. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Commodities, such as aredealt in by retail women's and children'sready-to-wear apparel 'stores, and inconnection therewith, supplies andequipment used in the conduct of suchbusinesses, between New York, N.Y., onthe one hand, and, on the other, pointsin Mississippi.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed opera-tions will be under contract with DianaStores Corporation.


No. MC 115601 (Sub-No. 18), filedOctober 31, 1962. Applicant: BROOKSARMORED CAR SERVICE, INC., 13East 35th Street, Wilmington, Del. Ap-plicant's attorney: H. James Conaway,Jr., Bank of Delaware Building, Wil-

12021

mington 1, Del. Authority sought tooperate as a contract carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: General commodities, moving in ex-press service, in packages and contain-ers (excluding liquids and commoditiesin bulk, household goods, Classes A andB explosives and commodities requiringspecial heavy equipment), between duPont Research Center, E. I. du Pont deNemours & Co., Inc., located at MilfordCross Roads, Newark, Del., on the onehand, and, on the other, points in Maine,New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachu-setts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Penn-sylvania, Ohio, New York, New Jersey,Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Ken-tucky and North Carolina.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed serv-ice will be under a continuing contract withE. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington D.C., before Ex-aminer Walter R. Lee.

No. MC 115669 (Sub-No. 34), filed No-vember 1, 1962. Applicant: HOWARDN. DAHLSTEN, doing business asDABLSTEN TRUCK LINE, Box 95, ClayCenter, Nebr. Applicant's attorney:Donald L. Stern, 924 City National BankBuilding, Omaha, Nebr. Authoritysought to operate a§ a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: (1) Salt and salt products,pepper, and mineral mixtures, fromHutchinson, Kans., to points in Wiscon-sin, Nebraska, North Dakota, SouthDakota, and Minnesota, (2) salt and saltproducts, from Lyons, Kans., and pointswithin three miles thereof, to points inWisconsin, North Dakota, South Dakota,and Minnesota, and (3) salt and saltproducts, from Pawnee Rock, Kans., andpoints within three miles thereof, topoints in Wisconsin.

HEARING: January 18, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex-aminer William E. Messer.

No. MC 116045 (Sub-No. 15), filed June22, 1962. Applicant: NEUMAN TRAN-SIT CO., INC., P.O. Box 31, Rawlins,Wyo. Applicant's attorney: Robert S.Stauffer, 1510 East 20th Street, Chey-enne, Wyo. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: (1)Sulphuric acid, in bulk, in tank vehicles,from Riverton and Jeffrey City, Wyo.and points within five (5) miles of each,to points in Colorado, Nebraska, Mon-tana, North Dakota, and South Dakota,and (2) sulphur, from all railhead pointsin Wyoming, to points in Wyoming, andempty containers or other such inci-dental facilities (not specified) used intransporting the commodities specifiedin (1) and (2) above, on return.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at TheDenver Hilton, Denver, Colo., before Ex-aminer Dallas B. Russell.

No. MC 116077 (Sub-No. 118) (CLARI-FICATION), filed January 19, 1962, pub-'lished issue October 10, 1962, clarifiedNovember 23, 1962, and republished asclarified this issue. Applicant: ROB-ERTSON TANK LINES, INC., P.O. Box9218, 5700 Polk Avenue, Houston, Tex.Applicant's attorney: Thomas E. James,

1 -NOTICES-

1535 Esperson Building, Houston 2, Tex.-Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: -Dry corn-modities, (1) between New Orleans, La.,and points within 75 miles thereof, onthe one hand, and, on the other, pointsin the United States, including Alaska,and (2) between Orange, Tex., and pointswithin 75 miles thereof, on the one hand,And, on the other, points in the United,States, including Alaska. Note: Thepurpose of the republication is to clarifythat New Orleans, La., is included in theproposed area of 75 miles thereof in (1)above, and that Orange, Tex., is includedin the proposed area of 75 miles thereof,in (2) above.

HEARING: Remains as assigned De-cember 10, 1962, at the Roosevelt Hotel,New Orleans, La., before Examiner JamesO'D. Moran. This assignment is for ap-plicant's presentation only.

No. MC 116434 (Sub-No. 26), filed June28, 1962. Applicant: Hugh Major, 150Sinclair, South Roxana, Ill. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Posts, poles, beams, pillarsand ties (and lumber not included -in theabove), between'Madison, Ill. and pointsin Mississippi on the one hand, and onthe other, points in Illinois, Indiana,Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin'andMissouri.

HEARING: January 8, 1963, at thePick-Congress, 500 South Michigan Ave-nue, Chicago, Ill., before ExaminerSamuel C. Shoup.

No. MC 116587 (Sub-No. 6), filedOctober 30, 1962. Applicant: EASTERN-WESTERN TRUCKING, INC., 37201Military Road North, Puyallup, Wash.Applicant's attorney: Earle V. White,2130 Southwest Fifth Avenue, Portland 1,Oreg. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Lumber,between points in Washington, on theone hand, and, on the other, points inDouglas, Lane, IAnn, Benton, Lincoln,Polk, Marion, Clackamas, Yamhill, Tilla-mook, Washington, Multnomah, Colum-bia, and Clatsop Counties, Oreg.-HEARING: January 23, 1963, at the

Federal Office Building, Seattle, Wash.,before Joint Board No.45, or, if the JointBoard waives its right to participate be-fore Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

No. MC 116645 (Sub-No. 2), filed Sep-tember 21, 1962. Applicant: E. BON-ABEL DAVIS, doing business as DAVISTRANSPORT, P.O. Box 56, Gilcrest,Colo. Applicant's attorney: Marion F.Jones, Suite 526 Denham Building, Den-ver 2, Colo. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transpoiting:Molasses, in bulk, in tank vehicles, fromLongmont, Loveland, Ft. Collins, Brigh-ton, Greeley, Windsor, Ft. Morgan, Ster-ling and Ovid, Colo., to points in Wyo-ming, Nebraska, and Kansas.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at The'Denver Hilton, Denver, Colo., beforeExaminer Dallas B. Russell.

No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 71), filedNovember 7, 1962. Applicant: WILLISSHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., ElmSprings, Ark. Applicant's attorneys:"

IN

A. Alvis Layne, Pennsylvania Building,Washington 4, D.C. and JohnH. Joyce,26 North College, Fayetteville, Ark.Authority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over.irregularroutes, transporting: Frozen foods, (1)from Kansas City, Kans., to Carthage,'Springfield, -eosho, Joplin, and Marion-ville, Mo., Pittsburg, Kans., and. Harri-son, Berryville and, Springdale, Ark., and(2) between Stilwell, Okla., Van Burenand Fayetteville, Ark.

NoTE: Common control may be involved.,

HEARING: January 21, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex-aminer Hugh M. Nicholson.

No. MC 117692 (Sub-No. 1) (REPUB-LICATION), filed June 8, 1962, publishedFEDERAL REGISTER, issue of August 8,1962, and republished this issue. Appli-cant: MAURICE TRANSPORT CO.,INC., P.O. Box 409, Morton, Ill. Appli-cant's attorney: Raymond L. Terrell,Myers Building, Springfield, Ill. By ap-plication filed June 8, 1962, applicantseeks to conduct operations as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Liquid fertilizer inbulk, in tank vehicles, (1) from the plantsites of Schrock Brothers Company atCongervlle and Gala, Ill., to points inWhite County, Ind., and those in DesMoines, Henry, Muscatine, Wappelo, VanBuren, Jefferson, Washington, 'Keokukand Jackson Counties, Iowa, and (2)from the plant site of Schrock BrothersCompany at or near Kentland, Ind., topoints in Champaign, Kankakee, Iro-quois, Livingston, Vermillion, and Wood-ford Counties, Ill. Hearing was held onthe application on October 11, 1962, atSpringfield, Ill., and .applicant was al-lowed to amend its application at thehearing to include five additional coun-ties in Iowa under part (1) of its applica-tion namely: Louisa, Lee, Scott, Cedarand Clinton Counties, Iowa. A Reportand Order, served October 19, 1962, findsthat applicant is fit, willing, and ableproperly to perform the service of a con-tract carrier by motor vehicle and toconform to the provision of the Inter-state Commerce Act and with the lawfulrequirements, rules, and regulations ofthe Commission thereunder,- and- thatoperation, in interstate or foreign com-merce by applicant as a contract carrierby motor vehicle over irregular routesunder continuing contracts with SchrockBrothers Company of Congerville, Ill.,of liquid fertilizer, in bulk, in tank ve-hicles, (1) from the plant sites of SchrockBrothers Company at Congerville andGalva, Ill., to points in White County,Ind., and those in Des Moines, Henry,Muscatine, Wappelo, Van Bureu, Jeffer-son, Washington, Keokuk, Jackson,Louisa, Lee, Scott, Clinton and CedarCounties, Iowa, and (2) from the plantsite of Schrock Brothers Company at ornear Kentland, Ind., to points in Cham-paign, Kankakee, Iroquois, Livingston;Vermillion, and Woodford Counties, Ill.The report also recommended that a cor-recl summary of the authority to be'granted herein will be newly publishedin the FEDERAL REGISTER with a provisionthat any interested party may file an-ap-

propriate pleading relating to his failureof notice. The permit to be issued hereinshould be withheld for a period of 30 dayspending such publication in the FEDERALREGISTER.

No. MC 119193 (Sub-No. 1),filed Oc-tober 26, 1962. Applicant: SAMACK,INC., 1041 Southeast Brooklyn, Portland,Oreg. Applicant's attorney. John MVLHickson, Failing Building,- Portland,Oreg. -Authority souglht to operate asa contract carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: (1)Canned, cased, packaged, boxed, bottledand sacked grocery items, (a) frompoints in Los Angeles, Monterey, Fresno,San Mateo, Alameda, San Joaquin, SanJose, Stanislaus, Sacramento, Sonoma,Sutter, Yolo, Lake, and Contra CostaCounties, Calif., to points in Yamhill,Josephine, Klamath, Jackson, Douglas,Deschutes, Linn, Lane, Wasco, Benton,Multnomah, Clackamas, Marion, andWashington Counties, Oreg., and pointsin Cowlitz County, Wash., and (b) frompoints in King, Pierce, and YakimaCounties, Wash., to points in Multnomah,Clackamas, Wasco, idnn,, Washington,Deschutes, Douglas, Lane, and YamhillCounties, Oreg., (2) shelled. nuts, from

-points in Washington and Yanhill Coun-ties, Oreg., to points in Humboldt, Men-docino, Sonoma, Marion, Shasta, Yuba,Butte, Sacramento, Fresno, Los Angeles,and Orange Counties, Calif., (3) shakesand shingles and wooden roofing mate-rials and shimm stock, from points inGrays Harbor, Pacific, Lewis, Cowlitz,and Wahkiakum Counties, Wash., andpoints in Clatsop, Columbia, Tillamook,Clackamas, Multnomah, Marion, Yam-hill, Polk, Linn, Lane, and DouglasCounties, Oreg., to points in California,(4) 'wood-en shingle ridges and shakeridges, and siimm stock, from points inMultnomah and Clackamas Counties,Oreg., to Points in Sacramento, Sonoma,Marion, Santa Clara, Contra Costa, SanJoaquin, Alameda, Monterey, and NapaCounties, iCalif., (5) roofing materialsof all kinds, from points in Santa Claraand Alameda Counties, Calif., to pointsin Oregon and Washington, (6) rejectedshipments, in connection with the com-modities specified in (1) through (5),on return.

NoTE: Applicant states that it also pro--poses to transport exempt commodities onreturn.

,HE-A-RING: January 16, 1963, at theInterstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.5, or, if the Joint Board waives its rightto participate before Examiner GordonM. Callow.- No. MC 119282 (Sub-No. 4), filed Octo-

ber 5, 1962. Applicant: L. F.-TAYLOROF PA., INC., R.D. No. 1, Mount Bethel,Pa. Applicant's representative: A. E.Enoch, Brodhead *.Block-556 MainStreet, Bethlehem, Pa. Authoritysought -to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: (1) Such bulk commodi-ties as are" transported in dump trucks,between points in Pennsylvania and NewJersey within 35 miles of Easton, Pa., in-cluding Easton, and (2) sand, gravel,crushed stone and slag, in bulk, in dump

12022


vehicles, from Oxford, N.J., to points inMonroe and Pike Counties, Pa.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at Room321-B, U.S. Custom House Building,Second and Chestnut Streets, Philadel-phia, Pa., before Examiner Armin G.Clement.

No. MC 119407 '(Sub-No. 1), filed Au-gust 20, 1962. Applicant: ASHINETRUCKING, INC., 14 Beach Street,Corinth, N.Y. Applicants attorney: W.Norman Charles, Eighty Bay Street, GlenFalls, N.Y. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: Pal-lets and charcoal, from Wells (HamiltonCounty), N.Y., to points in Connecticut,Massachusetts, New Hampshire, NewJersey, New York, Rhode Island andVermont.


No. MC 119702 (Sub-No. 7), filed Oc-tober 8, 1962. Applicant: STAHLYCARTAGE CO., a corporation, 130aHilsboro Avenue, Edwardsville, ll. Ap-plicant's attorney: Mack Stephenson,208 East Adams Street, Springfield, Ill.Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg-ular routes, transporting: Animal feedsupplements, in bulk, in tank vehicles,from Kingston Mines, Ill., and pointswithin five miles thereof, to points inIndiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Mis-souri, Ohio and Wisconsin.


No. MC 120543 (Sub-No. 7), filed Octo-ber 31, 1962. Applicant: FLORIDA RE-FRIGERATED SERVICE, INC., U.S. 301,North Dade City, Fla. Applicant's at-torney: Lawrence D. Fay, 1205 UniversalMarion Building, Jacksonville 1, Fla.Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg-ular routes, transporting: Meats, meatproducts and meat byproducts and pack-inghouse products, fresh and frozen invehicles equipped with mechanical re-frigeration, from Bristol, Va., to pointsin California, Oregon and Washington.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C.. before Ex-aminer Frank J. Mahoney.

No. MC 123189 (Sub-No. 1), filed Sep-tember 7, 1962. Applicant: DAVID T.COOTS, doing business as FRANKLINEXPRESS, Filter Plant Road, Franklin,Ky. Applicant's attorney: Robert M.Pearce, 22 1 2/ St. Clair Street, Frankfort,Ky. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overregular routes, transporting: Generalcommodities (except those of unusualvalue, Classes A and B explosives, house-hold goods as defined by the Commission,commodities in bulk, and those requir-ing special equipment), (1) betweenjunction of U.S. Highway 31W with Ken-tucky Highway 242, near Rich Pond, andBowling Green, Ky., from junction ofU.S. Highway 31W with Kentucky High-way 242 thence over U.S. Highway 31Wto Bowling Green, Ky., and return overthe same route, serving all intermediate

No. 235-6

FEDERAL REGISTER

points, and off-route points within threemiles of the specified route, (2) betweenFranklin and Glasgow, Ky., from Frank-lin, over Kentucky Highway 100, toScottsville, Ky., thence over U.S. High-way 31E, to Glasgow, and return overthe same route, serving all intermediatepoints, and off-route points within threemiles of the specified route, and (3) serv-ing points in Simpson, Allen and BarrenCounties, Ky., as off-route points in con-nection with applicant's authorized regu-lar route operations to Franklin, Scotts-ville, and Glasgow, Ky.

HEARING: January 8, 1963, at theKentucky Hotel, Louisville, Ky., beforeJoint Board No. 105.

No. MC 123435 (Sub-No. 3), filed Oc-tober 28, 1962. Applicant: PACIFICMOLASSES TRANSPORT COMPANY,doing business as P/M TRANSPORTCOMPANY, 215 Market Street, SanFranci sco 5, Calif. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Alfalfa pellets, in bulk, in speciallydesigned hopper tanks, from Betteravia,Calif., and Shandon, Calif., and pointswithin 10 miles of each, to Los AngelesHarbor and Long Beach, Calif., and con-taminated or rejected shipments ofalfalfa pellets, on return.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at theNew Mint Building, 133 Hermann Street,San Francisco, Calif., before Joint BoardNo. 75, or, if the Joint Board waives itsright to participate before Examiner F.Roy Linn.

No. MC 123502 (Sub-No. 4), filed Oc-tober 3, 1962. Applicant: FREE STATESTONE SERVICE, INC., 10 Vernon Ave-nue, Glen Burnie, Md. Applicant's at-torney: William J. Little, Fidelity Build-ing, Baltimore 1, Md. Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by mo-tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans-porting: (1) Sand and dirt, in bulk, indump vehicles, from Pasadena, Md., topoints in Delaware, West Virginia, Penn-sylvania, Virginia, and the District ofColumbia, (2) aggregate, in bulk, indump vehicles, from Arlington, Va., topoints in Maryland, (3) cinders, in bulk,in dump vehicles, from Baltimore, Md.,to Richmond, Va., and (4) ferr6us sul-phate, moist, in bulk, in dump vehicles,from Baltimore, Md., to points in Dela-ware, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, andVirginia.

Norn: Common control may be involved.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at Room709, U.S. Appraisers' Stores Building,Gay and Lombard Streets, Baltimore,Md., before Examiner Lawrence A. VanDyke, Jr.

No. MC 123603 (Sub-No. 1), filed No-vember 19, 1962. Applicant: DONALDJ. ICE, doing business as DONALD ICEBUILDING STONE, 1146, Stanley Av-enue, Evansville, Ind. Applicant's at-torney: Walter F. Jones, Jr., 1017-19Chamber of Commerce Building, Indi-anapolis 4, Ind. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: Coal, in dump or hopper type ve-hicles, (1) between points in WarrickCounty, Ind., and (2) between points inWarrick and Gibson Counties, Ind.

12023

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at Room908, Indiana Public Service Commission,New State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., beforeJoint Board No. 72.

No. MC 123920 (REPUBLICATION),filed September 11, 1961, published FED-ERAL REGISTER, issue of December 20,1961, amended May 28, 1962, republishedas amended, issue of July 25, 1962, andrepublished this issue. Applicant: EL-DON H. RIECK, Bay City, Wis. Byapplication filed September 11, 1961, ap-plicant seeks authority to operate as acontract carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes transporting: (1) Sandand machinery, machine parts, tools andsupplies used in the mining of sand,from points in Pierce County, Wis., topoints in Wabasha, Goodhue, Washing-ton, Ramsey and Hennepin Counties,Minn., and (2) empty containers ofother such incidental facilities (notspecified) and such machinery as may'beneeded and oil and chemicals, used intreating of sand, on return. Hearingwas held on September 19, 1962, at Min-neapolis, Minn., before Joint Board No.142. A Report and Recommended Order,served October 25, 1962, found that ap-plicant is fit, willing and able properlyto perform the service of a contract car-rier by motor vehiale and to conform tothe provisions of the Interstate Com-merce Act and with the lawful require-ments, rules, and regulationsof theCommission thereunder, and that opera-tion, in' interstate or foreign commerceby applicant as a contract carrier bymotor vehicle, under a continuing con-tract with Bay City Sand Company, Inc.,of Bay City, Wis., of (1) sand frompoints in Pierce County, Wis., to pointsin Wabasha, Goodhue, Washington,Ramsey, Dakota, and Hennepin Coun-ties, Minn., and (2) machinery, machineparts, tools and supplies used in themining and the treating of sand on re-turn movement, over irregular routes,will be consistent with the public inter-est and the national transportationpolicy, subject to the condition that anappropriate permit shall not be issueduntil after the elapse of 30 days from thedate of publication in the FEDERAL REG-ISTER of the authority recommended tobe granted herein, during which periodany interested party adversely affectedmay file an appropriate pleading.

No. MC 124047 (Sub-No. 10),filed September 13, 1962. Applicant:SCHWERMAN TRUCKING CO. OFOHIO, a corporation, 620 South 29thStreet, Milwaukee 46, Wis. Applicant'sattorney: James R. Ziperski (same ad-dress as applicant). Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by mo-tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans-porting: Dry cement, in bulk and inpackages, between points in Ohio.NOTE: Applicant states "the Interstate

Commerce Commission in docket MC 124047has-approved applicant's conversion fromcontract to common carriage-insofar as thetransportation of cement is concerned-andapplicant is awaiting issuance of its Certifi-cate. On July 26, 1962, applicant filed a,conversion application with the Commissionseeking to convert its remaining Permits toa Certificate and the matter is now pending

12024

before the Commission, thus, dual opera-tions may be involved." Common controlmay be Involved.


No. MC 124047 (Sub-No. 12), filedOctober 12, 1962. Applicant: SCHWER-MAN TRUCKING CO. OF OHIO, a cor-poration, 620 South 29th Street, Milwau-kee 46, Wis. Applicant's attorney:James R. Ziperski (same address as ap-plicant). Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: Drycement, in bulk and in packages, fromToledo, Ohio, to points in Ohio, theLower Peninsula of Michigan, and pointsin Wayne, Henry, Delaware, Madison,Hancock, and Marion Counties, Ind.

NoTE: Applicant states that it has au-thority to transport commodities other thancement as a contract carrier In lMC 111623and Subs thereunder; thus, dual operationsmay be involved. Also common control maybe involved.


No. MC 124266 (REPUBLICATION)filed March 9, 1962, pdblished FEDERALREGISTER issue of July 4, 1962, and re-published this issue- Applicant: NEL-

.SON GWILLIM, 914 Sumner Street,Carlinville, Ill. Authority sought to op-erate as a contract carrier, by motorvehicle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: (1) Dairy products (a) from Car-linville, Carbondale, Olney, Danville,-Springfield, Carlyle, Mount Sterling,Quincy and Alton, Ill., to Evansville,Ind., and (b) between Carlinville, Car-bondale, Olney, Danville, Springfield,Carlyle, Mount Sterling, Quincy andAlton, Ill., and Lafayette, Ind.; and (2)empty containers or other such inci-dental facilities (not specified) used inxtransporting dairy products, from theabove-specified destination points to therespective origin points.

NoTE: Applicant states the above-specifiedcommodities will be transported for the va-rious dairies of Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.This republication is to change this from aJoint Board to an Examiner hearing case.


No. MC 124524, filed June 11, 1962.Applicant: THE COSTELLO MOTORCOMPANY, a corporation, 2165 CurtisStreet, Denver, Colo. Applicant's at-torney: Alvin J. Meiklejohn, Jr., Den-ham Building, Denver 2, Colo. Author-ity sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: (1) Wrecked, dis-abled or damaged motor vehicles bywrecker truckaway method, and (2)operable replacement motor vehicles toreplace the wrecked, disabled," or dam-"aged motor vehicles in (1) above, bydriveaway or truckaway method, be-tween points in Colorado, on the onehand, and on the other, points in Wyo-ming, New Mexico, Kansas, Utah, Ne-.braska, lowa, South Dakota, Oklahoma,Texas, Arizona, Nevada and Idaho.

NOTICES

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at TheDenver Hilton, Denver, Colo., beforeExaminer Dallas- B. Russell.

No. MC 124641 (Sub-No. 1), filed Octo-ber 22, 1962. Applicant: AMERIGOBOCCHI, 371 South Main Street,Mechanicville, N.Y. Applicant's attor-ney: Thomas D. Nolan, 116 Park Avenue,Mechanicville, N.Y. Authority soughtto operate as a common carrier, by mo-tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans-porting: Brick, (1) between points inAlbany, Broome, Chena-go, Clinton,Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Dutchess,Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamil-ton, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Mont-gomery, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange,Oswego, Otsego, Putnam, Rensselaer, St.Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady,Scoharie, Sullivan, Ulster, Warren andWashington Counties, N.Y., (2) frompoints in Albany, Broome, Chenango,Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware,Dutchess, Essex, Franklin, Fulton,Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Jefferson,Lewis, Montgomery, Oneida, Onondaga,Orange, Oswego, Otsego, Putnam,Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga,Schenectady, Scoharie, Sullivan, Ulster,Warren and Washington Counties, N.Y.,to points in Susquehanna and WayneCounties, Pa., points in Bennington,Windham, Windsor, Rutland, Addison,Orange, Chittenden and WashingtonCounties, Vt., points in Cheshire County,N.H., points in Hartford County Conn.,and points in counties within the Com-monwealth of Massachusetts.

HEARING: January 23, 1963,, at theFederal Building, Albany, N.Y., beforeExaminer Armin G. Clement.

No. MC 124707, filed August 14, 1962.-Applicant: MILTON BRAXTON BAR-BOUR, doing business as, BARBOUR'STEXACO SERVICE, 1641 Glenwood Ave-nue, Raleigh, N.C. Applicant's attor-ney: Lemuel H. Davis, 708-10 ,Law-yers Building, Raleigh, N.C. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Automobiles, by towawaymethod, between points in North Caro-lina, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia,Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, NewYork, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, SouthCarolina, Virginia, West Virginia, andNew Jersey.

NOTE: The applicant states that the auto-mobiles will be transported from whereverthey are abandoned, surrendered, or re-possessed in any of the named States .fordelivery to dealers located in those States.

HEARING: January 10, 1963, at theU.S. Court Rooms,. Uptown Post OfficeBuilding, Raleigh, N.C., before ExaminerLeo M. Riegel.

No. MC 124748 (Sub-No. 1), filed No-vember 1, 1962. Applicant:. ROMANNOBBE, R.R. 3, Batesville, Ind. Appli-cant's attorney: Donald W. Smith, Suite511 Fidelity Building, Indianapolis 4,-Ind. Authority sought to operate as acontract carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Coal, indump trucks, from North Bend, Ohio, topoints in Indiana on and east of U.S.Highway 31 and on and south of U.S.Highway 36.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at Room908, Indiana Public Service Commission,

New. State Office Building, 100 NorthSenate Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., be-fore Joint Board No. 60.

No. MC 124751, filed September 6,1962. Applicant: GEORGE VERNONJACKSON, doing business as VERNONJACKSON OR VERNON'S TRANSFER,430 North Pulaski Street, Baltimore 23,Md. Applicant's attorney: William H.Murphy, 12 East Pleasant Street, Balti-more 2, Md. Authority sought to oper-ate as a contract carrier, by motor vehi-cle, over irregular routes, transport-ing: General commodities (except com-modities of unusual value, Classes A andB explosives, and commodities in bulk),from Baltimore, Md., to New York, N.Y.,and empty containers or other such in-cidental facilties (not specified) used intransporting the above described com-modities, on return.

REARING: January 7, 1963, at Room709, U.S. Appraisers' Stores Building,Gay and Lombard Streets, Baltimore,Md., before Examiner Lawrence A. VanDyke, Jr.

No. MC 124756, filed September 8, 1962.Applicant: EAGLE, INC., Pier 3, City ofMiami Docks, Miami, Fla. Applicant'sattorney: Theodore A. Goldstein, Suite314-17 Congress Building, Miami 32, Fla.Authority sought to operate as a con-tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: Generalcommodities (except those of unusualvalue, Classes A and B explosives, house-hold goods as defined by the Commission,commodities in bulk and those requiringspecial equipment), between Tampa, Fla.and Miami, Fla.

NoTE: Applicant states shipments eitheroriginating or terminating in or from SanJuan, P-R.

HEARING: january 22, 1963, at theDupont Plaza Hotel, 300 Biscayne Boule-vard Way, Miami, Fla., before JointBoard No. 205, or, if the Joint Boardwaives its right to participate before Ex-aminer Charles B. Heinemann.

No. MC 124797, filed September 18,1962. Applicant: PAUL LAMA]DA, do-ing business as A-ABA TRUCKING &PACKAGE DELIVERY, 302 West 21stStreet, New York, N.Y. Applicant's at-torney: Henry H. Diener, 570 SeventhAvenue, New York 18, N.Y. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over regular routes,transporting: General commodities (ex-cept those of unusual value, Classes Aand B explosives, household goods as de-fined by. the Commission, commoditiesin bulk, and those requiring specialequipment), from New York, N.Y.through the Lincoln Tunnel to New Jet-sey Highway 3, thence over New JerseyHighway 3 to New Jersey Highway 17,thence over New Jersey Highway 17 toU.S. Highway 46, thence over U.S. High-way 46 to Teterboro and South Hacken-sack, N.J., serving no intermediatepoints..


No. MC 124805, filed September 24,1962. Applicant: RAYMOND R.DOBOS, doing business as GLOBE MO-BILE HOMES, 14961 Aurora Avenue,North Seattle, Wash. Applicant's at-


torney: George Kargianis, 609-11 Nor-ton Building, Seattle 4, Wash. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: New and used house trail-ers, mobile homes, campers and camperboxes, in truckaway and towaway serv-ice, in primary or secondary service be-tween points in Washington, Oregon,Idaho and California.

HEARING: January 25, 1963, at theFederal Office Building, Seattle, Wash-ington, before Examiner G6rdon LCallow.

No. MC 124814 (Sub-No. 1), filed No-vember 5, 1962. Applicant: LLOYDMeVEY, doing business as McVEYTRUCKING, Oakwood, Ill. Applicant'sattorney: Clyde l\Ieachum, 704-710Baum Building, Danville, Ill. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, between Septemberand May inclusive each year, over ir-regular routes, transporting: Dry fer-tilizer, in bulk, in trailers equipped withbelt conveyor or auger equipment, fromDanville, Ill., to points in Iowa, Ken-tucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Ten-nessee, Wisconsin, and Indiana.

HEARING: January 11, 1963, at theU.S. Court Rooms and Federal Building,Springfield, Ill., -before Examiner Wil-liam A. Royall.

No. MC 124818, filed September 28,1962. Applicant: HOWARD M. ROB-INSON, doing business as ROBINSONWRECKER SERVICE, Ellerson, Va.Applicant's attorney: Henry E. Ketner,State-Planters Bank Building, Rich-mond, Va. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting:Wrecked, disabled and stolen vehiclesand component parts thereof, andtrailers (excepting mobile homes andhouse trailers designed to be drawn bypassenger automobiles), by wreckerequipment only, between points in Vir-ginia, on the one hand, and, on the other,points in North Carolina and Washing-ton, D.C.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at theFederal Building, 400 North Eighth St.,Richmond, Va., before Examiner Leo A.Riegel.

No. MC 124824, filed October 1, 1962.Applicant: ROBERT E. HAUGEN, 3346West Woodside, Spokane, Wash. Appli-cant's attorney: Hugh A. Dressel, 702Old National Bank Building, Spokane 1,Wash. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Bananas,from Sacramento and San Francisco,Calif. to Spokane, Wash.

NoTE: Applicant states he proposes totransport exempt commodities when avail-able on any south-bound trips.

HEARING: January 30, 1963, at theDavenport Hotel, Spokane, Wash., be-fore Joint Board No. 5 or if the JointBoard waives its right to participate be-fore Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

No. MC 124841, filed October 10, 1962.Applicant: DALE. D. JACOBS, Route 4,Dell Avenue, Walla Walla, Wash. Au-thority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Frozen fruits,vegetables, juices and plant supplies,

FEDERAL REGISTER

between points in Washingtoxi, Oregon,Idaho and California.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed opera-tion is for General Foods Corporation, BirdsEye Division, of Walla Walla, Wash. Com-mon control may be involved.

HEARING: January 31, 1963, at theDavenport Hotel, Spokane, Wash., be-fore Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

No. MC 124844, filed October 12, 1962.Applicant: M. L. BROWN, INC., 2414Hartley Place, Maplecrest, Wilmington 8,Del. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting and tow-ing: Wrecked and disabled commercialvehicles and such commercial vehicles asmay be necessary to replace said wreckedand disabled commercial vehicles, be-tween Wilmington, Del., on the one hand,and, on the other, points in Delaware,Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey,District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia,North Carolina, South Carolina and WestVirginia.

HEARING: January 9, 1963, at Room321-B, U.S. Custom House Building, Sec-ond and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia,Pa., before Examiner Armin G. Clement.

No. MC 124847, filed October 8, 1962.Applicant: VERNON KISER AND W. T.KISER, a partnership, doing business asKISER & SON, Olive Hill, Ky. Appli-cant's attorney: Richard H. Brandon,Hartman Building, Columbus 15, Ohio.Authority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: (1) Limestone, inbulk, in dump vehicles, from Olive Hilland Carter City, Ky., and points within10 miles of each to points in Gallia, Law-rence and Scioto Counties, Ohio andpoints in Cabell, Lincoln and WayneCounties, W. Va., (2) slag, in bulk, indump vehicles, from Ashland, Ky., topoints in Gallia, Lawrence and SciotoCounties, Ohio and points in Cabell, Lin-coln and Wayne Counties, W. Va., (3)sand, in bulk in dump vehicles, fromHaverhill, Ohio and points within 2miles thereof to points in Carter, Boydand Greenup Counties, Ky.

NoTE: Applicant states that the transpor-tation service to be performed will be undercontinuing contract or contracts with TheStandard Slag Company, 1200 StambaughBuilding, Youngstown, Ohio.


No. MC 124856, filed October 15, 1962.Applicant: TRIO TRUCKING CORP.,127 South Fourth Street, New Hyde Park,N.Y. Applicant's attorney: Abraham M.Stanger, 39 Broadway, New York 6, N.Y.Authority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Household appli-ances such as, refrigerators, washing ma-chines, dryers, dishwashers, ranges, airconditioners, television sets, dehumidi-flers, freezers, and rejected or defectivemerchandise, between New Hyde Park,N.Y., and points in New York, Bronx,Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suf-folk, Westehester, Putnam and RocklandCounties, N.Y., and points in Hudson,Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Morris, Mon-mouth, Union, Somerset and Middlesex

12025

Counties, N.J., and points in FairfieldCounty, Conn.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed oper-ation will be exclusively for Home Center,Inc., New Hyde Park, N.Y.

HEARING: January 15, 1963, at 346Broadway, New York, N.Y., before Exam-iner Armin G. Clement.

No. MC 124867, filed October 17, 1962.Applicant: HAROLD SELDERS, doingbusiness as SELDERS SALES, Van Orin,Ill. Applicant's attorney: John C. Hed-rich, 7 Park Avenue East, Princeton, Ill.Authority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Used mobile homes,from points in that part of Illinois onand north of a line beginning at theIowa-Illinois State Line and extendingalong U.S. Highway 34 to Galesburg, Ill.,thence along U.S. Highway 150, throughPeoria, Bloomington, and Danville, ll.,to the Illinois-Indiana State Line topoints in Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, In-diana, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama,Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Texas,Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Ari-zona, Nebraska, and Ohio, and emptycontainers or other such incidental fa-cilities (not specified) used in transport-ing the commodities specified above, onreturn.


No. MC 124871, filed October 25, 1962.Applicant: GEORGE MOSES THOMP-SON, doing business as THOMPSONTRUCKING CO., 1120 Chapel OaksDrive, Washington 27, D.C. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Building materials, in-cluding concrete masonry block, brick,portland and masonry cements in bags,calcium chloride, fire brick, flue lining,flue thimbles, wall ties, wire reinforce-ment and sand, from plants in Bladens-burg and Hyattsville, Md., to points inMontgomery, Prince Georges, Howard,Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St.Marys Counties, Md., Alexandria, Va.,and points in Arlington, Fairfax, PrinceWilliam, and Loudoun Counties, Va., andthe District of Columbia, and empty con-tainers or other such incidental facili-ties (not specified) used in transportingthe above-specified commodities, onreturn.

HEARING: January 14, 1963, at theOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com-mission, Washington, D.C., before JointBoard No. 68.

No. MC 124875, filed October 26, 1962.Applicant: NRM TRUCKING CO., a cor-poration, P.O. Box 205, Morehall Road,Malvern, Pa. Applicant's attorney: H.James Conaway, Jr, Bank of DelawareBuilding, Wilmington 1, Del. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Roll formed metal mould-ings, together with accessory items,from points in Chester County, Pa., topoints in the United States (excludingAlaska and Hawaii), and empty con-tainers or other such incidental facilities(not specified) used in transporting theabove described commodities, steel coils

and other raw materials used in manu- paperboard, and plastic milk and foodfacturing metal mouldings, damaged and containers and plastic wax, betweenrejected supplies of the above described Gardner, Mass., and Berwick, Pa., andcommodities, and excess inventory of from Gardner, Mass., to points in Con-such commodities, on return. necticut, Rhode Island, Maine, New

HEARING: January 16, 1963, at the Hampshire, Vermont, and New York, andOffices of the Interstate Commerce Com- (6) materials and supplies used in or use-mission, before Examiner Jerry F. ful to the manufacture of fiberboard,Laughlin. paper, paperboard and plastic food and

No. MC 124880, filed October 29, 1962. milk containers from points in NewApplicant: SPRIGGS DISTRIBUTING Jersey, New York, Maine, New Hamp-COMPANY, a corporation, 1419 South shire, Vermont, Connecticut, and RhodeThird Street, Ironton, Ohio. Applicant's Island, to Gardner, Mass.attorney: Robert N. Krier, 3430 LeVeque- HEARING: January 10, 1963, at theLincoln Tower, Fifty West Broad Street, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission,Columbus 15, Ohio. Authority sought to Harrisburg, Pa., before Examiner Law-operate as a contract carrier, by motor rence A. Van Dyke, Jr.vehicle, over iregular routes, transport- No. MC 124928, filed November 19, 1962.ing: Beer, wine and malt beverages, Applicant: JAY RUTHERFORD HIG-from Cincinnati and Cleveland, Ohio, to GINS, 419 Conway Avenue, Narberth,Huntington, W.. Va., and empty bottles Pa. Applicant's attorney: H. Josephand cartons, containers, cases, kegs, pal- Harrison, 303 Suburban Square Building,lets and empty containers or other such Ardmore, Pa. Authority sought to oper-incidental facilities (not specified) used ate as a common carrier, by motor ve-in transporting the above described com- hicle, over irregular routes, transporting:modities, on return. Objects of art and antiques and empty

containers or other such incidental facil-NOTE: Applicant states the proposed oper-ations will be under continuing contract ities (not specified) used in transportingwith Allied Beverage Company, Huntington, the above described commodities, be-w. Va. tween points in Pennsylvania, New York,

New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and theHEARING: January 8, 1963, at the District of Columbia.

New Post Office Building, Columbus, HEARING: January 9, 1963, at RoomOhio, before Joint Board No. 62. 321-B, U.S. Custom House Building,

No. MC 124919, filed November 13, Second and Chestnut Streets, Philadel-1962. Applicant: SERGIN P. GAN- phia, Pa., before Examiner Armin G.CARZ, 8 Linden Street, Adams, Mass. Clement.Applicant's representative: William L.Mobley, 1694 Main Street, Springfield 3, MOTOR CARRIERS OF PASSENGERSMass. Authority sought to operate as a No. MC 3647 (Sub-No. 332), filed Sep-common carrier, by motor vehicle, over tember 10, 1962. Applicant: PUBLIC

-irregular routes, transporting: Lime- SERVICE COORDINATED TRANS-stone, in bulk, in spreader equipped ye- PORT, a corporation, 180 Boyden Ave-h'icles and in, dump trucks, from Adams nue, Maplewood, N.J. Applicant's attor-and Farnams, Mass., to points in Ben- ney: Richard Fryling (same address asnington and Windham Counties, Vt., applicant). Authority sought to operateRensselaer County, N.Y., and Cheshire as a common carrier, by motor vehicle,County, N.H. J over irregular routes, transporting:

HEARING: January 24, 1963, at the Passengers and their baggage, in specialFederal Building, Albany, N.Y., before operations, in round-trip sightseeing andExaminer Armin G. Clement. pleasure tours, beginning and ending at

No. MC 124920, filed November 14, Philadelphia, Pa., and extending to1962. Applicant: JAMES C. LaBAR, Yonkers, N.Y.R.D. No. 2, Berwick, Pa. Applicant's HEARING: January 21, 1963, at Roomrepresentative: John W. Frame, 603 321-B, U.S. Court House Building,North Front Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Second and Chestnut Streets, Philadel-Authority sought to operate as a commion phia, Pa., before Joint Board No. 42, or,carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular if the Joint Board waives its right toroutes, transporting: (1) Games and participate before Examiner Lawrence A.toys, playground apparatus, equipment, Van Dyke, Jr.and paraphernalia, from Wilkes-Barre, No. MC 3647 (Sub-No. 335), filedPa., to Los Angeles, Calif., (2) materials September 26, 1962. Applicant: PUBLICand supplies used in or useful to the SERVICE COORDINATED TRANS-manufacture of games and toys, play- PORT, 180 Boyden Avenue, Maplewood,ground apparatus, equipment, and para- N.J. Applicant's attorney: Richardphernalia from Oakland and San Fran- Fryling (same address as applicant).cisco, Calif., and points in Alameda, Authority sought to operate as a commonContra Costa, Marin, San Matio, and carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularSanta Clara Counties, Calif., to Wilkes- routes, transporting: Passengers andBarre, Pa., (3) fiberboard, paper, paper- their baggage, in special operations, inboard, and plastic milk and food con- round trip sightseeing and pleasuretainers, and plastic wax, from Berwick, tours, beginning and-ending at Philadel-Pa., to points in New York, New Jersey, phia, Pa. and extending to Buffalo, N.Y.Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Vir- and points within 25 miles thereof, in-ginia, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., (4) cluding Ports of Entry on the Interna-materials and supplies Used in or useful tional Boundary line between the Unitedto the manufacture of fiberboard, paper, States and Canada.paperboard, and plastic milk and food HEARING: January 10, 1963, at Roomcontainers and plastic wax, from the 321-B, U.S. Custom House Building, Sec-above-described destination territory to ond and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia,Berwick, Pa., (5) fiberboard, p aper, Pa., before Examiner Armin G. Clement.

- No. MC 109199 (Sub-No. 4), filed Octo-ber 2,1962. Applicant: CLYDE B. DID-LAKE, doing business as CLYDE'sCHARTER BUS SERVICE, 301 FurnaceBranch Road East, Glen Burnie, Md.Applicant's attorney: S. Harrison Kahn,1110-14 Investment Building, Washing-ton, D.C. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: Pas-sengers and their baggage, in round-tripcharter operations, beginning and end-ing at Glen Burnie, Md. and pointswithin ten (10) miles thereof, exclusiveof Baltimore Md., and extending topoints in Maine, Vermont, New Hamp-shire, Masachusetts, Rhode Island, Con-necticut, North Carolina, South Carolina,Ohio, Michigan, Indiana and Illinois.

HEARING: January 8, 1963, at Room709, U.S. Appraisers' Stores Building,Gay and Lombard Streets, Baltimore,Md., before Examiner Lawrence A. VanDyke, Jr.

No. MC 123178 (Sub-No. 2), filed Octo-ber 11, 1962. Applicant: LAWRENCEC. JENSEN, doing business as JENSENTRANSPORTATION, 155 South FirstStreet, St. Helens, Oreg. Applicant's at-torney: Robert R. Hollis, 1121 EquitableBuilding, Portland 4, Oreg. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,

'by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Passengers and their bag-gage, in round-trip charter operations,beginning and ending at points in Co-lumbia County, Oreg., and extending topoints in Grays Harbor, Jefferson, Ma-son, Kitsap, Clallam, Island, San Juan,Snohomish, Skagit, Whatcom, Okano-gan, Chelan, Douglas, Kittitas, Grant,Yakima, Klickitat, Benton, WaUWalla, Franklin, Columbia, Garfield,Asotin, Whitman, Adams, Lincoln, Spo-kane, Ferry, Stevens, and Pend OreilleCountfes, Wash. -

HEARING: January 15, 1963, at theInterstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.

.45, or, if the Joint Board waives its jightto pjrticipate before Examiner GordonM. Callow.

No. MC 123178 (Sub-No. 3), filed Octo-ber 11, 1962. Applicant: LAWRENCEC. JENSEN, doing business as JENSENTRANSPORTATION, 155 South FirstStreet, St. Helens, Oreg. Applicants at-torney: Robert R. Hollis, 1121 EquitableBuilding, Portland 4, Oreg. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Passengers and their bag-gage; in round-trip charter operations,beginning and ending at points in Co-lumbia County, Oreg., and extending topoints in King County, Wash.

HEARING: January 15, 1963, at theInterstate Commerce Commission Hear-ing Room, 410 Southwest 10th Avenue,Portland, Oreg., before Joint Board No.45, or, if the Joint Board waives its rightto participate before Examiner GordonM. Callow.

No. MC 124737, filed August 24, 1962.Applicant: A. B. ALIEN, doing businessas ALLEN TRANSPORTATION CO.,213-13th Street (P.O. Box 2190), Sacra-mento, Calif. Applicant's attorney:Marvin Handler, 625 Market Street, San

12026 NOTICES '


Francisco 5, Calif. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over regular routes, transport-ing: Passengers and their baggage, andexpress, and newspapers, and mail, inthe same vehicle with passengers, (A)between San Francisco and Oakland,Calif., on the one hand, and, on theother, points in Nevada on the eastshore of Lake Tahoe located on U.S.Highway 50 and Nevada Highway 28(known as "Rim of the Lake Drive")including Crystal Bay on the north andStateline on the south, over the fol-lowing routes: (1) U.S. Highways 50and 99 to Sacramento, thence over U.S.Highway 50 and Nevada Highway 28,or U.S. Highway 50, California High-ways 89 and 28 and Nevada Highway 28to destination, (2) U.S. Highway 40 toSacramento, thence over U.S. Highway50 and Nevada Highway 28, or U.S.Highway 50, California Highways 89 and28 and Nevada Highway 28 to destina-tion, (3) U.S. Highway 40 to the junctionof U.S. Highway 40 and California High-way 89 near Truckee, Calif., thence overCalifornia Highway 89 to destinationover either California Highway 28, Ne-vada Highway 28 and U.S. Highway 50,or California Highway 89, U.S. Highway50 and Nevada Highway 28 (unnumberedhighway from Truckee to the junctionof California Highway 28 east of TahoeVista may be used as an alternate route),(4) U.S. Highways 50 and 99 to Sacra-mento, thence over U.S. Highway 40 tothe junction of U.S. Highway 40 andCalifornia Highway 89 near Truckee,Calif., thence over California Highway89 to destination over either CaliforniaHighway 28, Nevada Highway 28 andU.S. Highway 50, or California Highway89, U.S. Highway 50 and Nevada High-way 28 (unnumbered highway fromTruckee to the junction of CaliforniaHighway 28 east of Tahoe Vista may beused as an alternate route), (B) betweenSan Jose, Calif., on the one hand, and,on the other, points in Nevada on theeast shore of Lake Tahoe located onU.S. Highway 50 and Nevada Highway28 (known as "Rim of the Lake Drive")including Crystal Bay on the north andStateline on the south, over the follow-ing routes: (1) U.S. Highway 101 and101 Bypass, to San Francisco and Cali-fornia Highway 17 to Oakland, Calif.,thence over routes (1), (2), (3) and (4)under (A) above to destination, and(2) U.S. Highway 101, and 101 Bypass,to the junction of California Highway17, thence over California Highway 17to the junction with California Highway21, thence over California Highway 21to the junction with U.S. Highway 50near Dublin, Calif., thence over routes(1) or (4) under (A) above to destina-tion, (C) between Sacramento, Calif., onthe one hand, and, on the other, pointsin Nevada on the east shore of LakeTahoe located on U.S. Highway 50 andNevada Highway 28 (known as "Rim ofthe Lake Drive") including Crystal Bayon the north and Stateline on the south,over the following routes: (1) U.S. High-way 50 and Nevada Highway 28, or U.S.Highway 50, California Highways 89 and28 and Nevada Highway 28 to destina-tion, and (2) U.S. Highway 40 to the

FEDERAL REGISTER

junction of California Highway 89 nearTruckee, Calif., thence over CaliforniaHighway 89 to destination over eitherCalifornia Highway 28, Nevada Highway28 and U.S. Highway 50 or CaliforniaHighway 89, U.S. Highway 50 and NevadaHighway 28 (unnumbered highway fromTruckee to the junction of CaliforniaHighway 28 east of Tahoe Vista may beused as an alternate route).

NOTE: Applicant also proposes to conductcharter and special operations between thesame points. Applicant states the proposedoperation will be in luxury type service.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theNew Mint Building, 133 Hermann Street,San Francisco, Calif., before Joint BoardNo. 78, or, if the Joint Board waives itsright to participate before Examiner F.Roy Linn.

No. MC 124738 (Sub-No. 15, filed Sep-tember 14, 1962. Applicant: CHAR-LOTTE LAMENDOLA, doing business asPOWER CITY BUS LINE, 151 CenterStreet, Massena, N.Y. Applicant's rep-resentative: Raymond A. Richards, 35Curtice Park, P.O. Box 25, Webster, N.Y.Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: Passengersand their baggage, in charter operations,(1) between points in Saint LawrenceCounty, N.Y. (except Massena, N.Y.), onthe one hand, and, on the other, theports of entry on the InternationalBoundary between the United States andCanada, located at or near Fort Coving-ton, Ogdensburg, Rooseveltown, andTrout River, N.Y., and (2) betweenpoints in Franklin County, N.Y. (on thefollowing route-New York Highway 37at the boundary of Saint Lawrence andFranklin Counties at or near Roose-veltown, N.Y., thence over New York,Highway 37 through Hogansburg toBradley Corners thence over New YorkHighway 95, to the junction of U.S.Highway 11 at Moria; thence over U.S.Highway 11 westerly to the boundaryof St. Lawrence and Franklin County),on the one hand, and, on the other, portsof entry on the International Boundarybetween the United States and Canada,located at or near Ft. Covington, Og-densburg, Rooseveltown, and TroutRiver, N.Y.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed serv-ice will be on traffic destined to or originatingin Canada. I


No. MC 124738 (Sub-No. 2), filed Sep-tember 17, 1962. Applicant: CHAR-LOTTE LAMENDOLA, doing business asPOWER CITY BUS LINES, 151 CenterStreet, Massena, N.Y. Applicant's rep-resentative: Raymond A. Richards, 35Curtice Park, P.O. Box 25, Webster,N.Y. Authority sought to operate as acommon carrier, by motor vehicle, overirregular routes, transporting: Passen-gers and their baggage, in regular serv-ice and in charter operations, betweenMassena, N.Y., and the ports of entry onthe International Boundary line betweenthe United States and Canada at or nearFort Covington, Ogdensburg, Roose-

12027

veltown and Trout River, N.Y., on trafficdestined to or originating in Canada.

HEARING: -January 8, 1963, at theFederal Building, Syracuse, N.Y., beforeExaminer James A. McKiel.

No. MC 124869, filed October 22, 1962.Applicant: SURREY BUS SERVICELIMITED, 2131 Clarke Street, PortMoody, British Columbia, Canada. Au-thority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: Passengers andtheir baggage in the same vehicle withpassengers, in special operations, be-tween the port of entry on the Inter-national Boundary line, between theUnited States and Canada at PeaceArch and Blaine, Wash.

NOTE: Applicant states that no local pas-sengers will be transported in Washington.

HEARING: January 22, 1963, at theFederal Office Building, Seattle, Wash.,before Joint Board No. 237, or, if theJoint Board waives its right to partici-pate before Examiner Gordon M. Callow.

APPLICATION FOR BROKERAGE LICENCES

MOTOR CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS

No. MC 12830, filed September 26,1962. Applicant: CANTON AUTOMO-BILE CLUB, doing business as CANTONAUTOMOBILE CLUB, Box 989, 2701Fulton Drive NW., Canton, Ohio. Fora license (BMC 5) to engage in opera-tions as a broker, at Canton, Ohio, inarranging for transportation in inter-state or foreign commerce of Passengersand their baggage, in groups, in charteroperations, beginning and ending atCanton, Ohio, and extending to pointsin New York, New Jersey, Maryland,Virginia, Vermont, New Hampshire,Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsyl-vania, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana andWashington, D.C.

HEARING: January 7, 1963, at theNew Post Office Building, Columbus,-Ohio, before Joint Board No. 117.

No. MC 12831, filed September 28,1962. Applicant: SIGVALD G. SAND-NES, SIDNEY G. SANDNES, CARROLLR. SANDNES, EDWARD S. SANDNES,HELEN M. SANDNES, ARNOLD G.SANINES, GAIL H. SANDNES, ANDGERTA SANDNES, a partnership, doingbusiness as WINDWARD TRAVEL CEN-TER, Camp Hill Shopping Center, CampHill, Pa. Applicant's attorney: S. Har-rison Kahn, 1110-14 Investment Build-ing, Washington, D.C. For a license(BMC 5) to engage in operations as abroker at Camp Hill, and Lancaster,Pa., in arranging for the transportationin interstate or foreign commerce bymotor vehicle of passengers and theirbaggage in special or charter operations,between points in the United States, in-cluding Hawaii and Alaska, with au-thorization and license to engage inoperations as a broker at points in Lan-caster and Cumberland Counties andthe cities of Harrisburg, Camp Hill andLancaster, Pa.

HEARING: January 15, 1963, at thePennsylvania Public Utility Commission,Harrisburg, Pa., before Joint Board No.65, or, if the Joint Board waives itsright to participate before ExaminerLawrence A. Van Dyke, Jr.

NOTICES

No. MC 12832, filed October 3, 1962.Applicant: CYLDE H. SHAFFER, doingbusiness as SHAFFER TRAVEL SERV-ICE, 189 Washington Avenue, Van-dergrift, Pa. Applicant's attorney: S.Harrison Kahn, 1110-14 InvestmentBuilding, Washington, D.C. For a li-cense (BMC 5) to engage in operationsas a broker at Vandergrift, Pa., in ar-ranging for the transportation in inter-state or oreign commerce -of Passengersand their baggage, both as individualsand groups, in special and charter op-erations, round-trip, all expense tours,beginning and ending at points in West-moreland, Armstrong, Indiana and Alle-gheny Countie, (except Pittsburgh) Pa.and extending to points in the UnitedStates, including Hawaii and Alaska.


No. MC 12833, filed October 5, 1962.Applicant: MARY H. LEE, doing busi-ness as MARY LEE TRAVEL AGENCY,809 12 Ligonier Street, Latrobe, Pa. Ap-plicant's attorney: S. Harrison Kahn,1110-14 Investment Building, Washing-ton, D.C. For a license (BMC 5) toengage in operations as a broker atLatrobe, Pa., in arranging for the trans-portation in interstate or foreign com-merce of Passengers and their baggage,in special and charter operations, both asindividuals and groups, in round-trip,all expense tours, beginning and endingat points in Westmoreland, Somerset,Cambria, Fayette and Indiana Counties,Pa. and extending to points in the UnitedStates, including Hawaii and Alaska.

HEARING: January 17, 1963, at thePennsylvania Public Utility Commission,Harrisburg, Pa., before Joint Board No.65, or, if the Joint Board waives its rightto participate before Examiner LawrenceA. Van Dyke, Jr.

No. MC 12840, filed November 8, 1962.Applicant: NORBERT J. McGETTI-GAN, doing business as McGETTIGAN'STRAVEL BUREAU, INC., Suite 1604,Fox Building, 1612 Market Street, Phila-delphia, Pa. Applicant's attorney: L. C.Major, Jr., 2001 Massachusetts Avenue,NW., Washington 6, D.C. For a license(BMC 5) to engage in operations as abroker at Philadelphia, Pa., in arrangingfor the transportation by motor vehiclein interstate or foreign commerce ofPassengers and their baggage, both as in-dividuals and groups, between points inthe United States.


No. MC 12841, filed November 16, 1962.Applicant: ANNE HOLDEN BRADEN,doing business as FLAIR TRAVEL CON-SULTANTS, 346 East Bowman Street,Wooster, Ohio. For a license (BMC 5)to engage in operations as a broker atWooster, Ohio, in arranging for thetransportation in interstate or foreigncommerce by motor vehicle of individualpassengers and group of passengers and

their baggage, beginning and ending atpoints in Ohio and extending to pointsin Ohio, New York, Maryland, District ofColumbia, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana,Pennsylvania and New Jersey.


APPLICATION IN WHICH HANDLING WITH-OUT ORAL HEARING HAS BEEN ELECTED

MaOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY

No. MC 531 (Sub-No. 133), filed No-vember 16, 1962. Applicant: YOUNGERBROTHERS, INC., 4904 Griggs Road,Houston, Tex. Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motor ve-hicle, over irregular routes, transporting:Creosote oil,_in bulk, in tank vehicles,from Mobile, Ala., to points in Georgiaand Mississippi, and rejected shipments,on return.

NOTE: Common control may be involved.

No. MC 3009 (Sub-No. 46), filed No-vember 21, 1962. Applicant: WESTBROTHERS, INC., 706 East Pine Street,Hattiesburg, Miss. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over regular routes, transport-,ing: General commodities, (except thoseof unusual value, Classes A and B ex-plosives, household goods as defined bythe Commission, commodities in bulk,and those requiring special equipment),between Brandon, and Meridian, Miss.,from Brandon, over U.S. Highway 80 toMeridian, and return over the sameroute, serving no intermediate points,as an alternate route for operating con-venience only,' serving Brandon as apoint of joinder only.

No. MC 11041 (Sub-No. 3), filed No-vember 21, 1962. Applicant: JOSEPH J.CRAIG, 518 Hortman Street, Blackwood,N.J. Applicant's attorney: Raymond A.Thistle, Jr., Suite 1408-09, 1500 WalnutStreet, Philadelphia 2, Pa. Authoritysought to operate as a contract carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Electric and gas appliancesand supplies therefor, from King ofPrussia, Pa., to points in Mercer, Burling-ton, Atlantic, Camden, Gloucester, Salemand Cumberland Counties, N.J., pointswithin a 40 mile radius of City Hall, Phil-adelphia, Pa., and Wilmington, Del., andrefused, rejected, and damaged mer-chandise, on return.

NOTE: Applicant states the proposed op-erations will be under a continuing contractor contracts with Philadelphia Distributors,Inc.

No. MC 28132 (Sub-No. 65), filed No-vember-21, 1962. Applicant: HVIDSTENTRANSPORT, INC., 2225 West County,Road D, St. Paul 12, Minn. Applicant'sattorney: Alan Foss, First National BankBuilding, Fargo, N. Dak. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Petroleum and petroleumproducts, in bulk, in tank vehicles, fromWrenshall, Minn., to points in Minnesotaon and east of U.S. Highway 53, re-stricted to the handling of traffic destinedto points in Minnesota.

No. MC 35628 (Sub-No. 245), filed No-vember 21, 1962. Applicant:- INTER-STATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM, a

corporation, 134 Grandville S.W., GrandRapids, Mich. Applicant's attorney:Leonard D. Verdier, Jr., Michigan TrustBuilding, Grand Rapids 2, Mich. Au-thority sought to operate as a commoncarrier, by motor vehicle, over regularroutes, transporting: General commodi-ties (except Classes A and B explbsives,household goods as defined by the Com-mission and commodities in bulk, exceptscrap metal, in bulk), serving Kempton,Ind., as an off-route point, in connectionwith applicant's authorized regular routeoperations.

No. MC 96079 (Sub-blo. 2), filedAugust 29, 1962. Applicant: KELLYAUGUSTA CRAWFORD, doing businessas KELLY CRAWFORD TRANSFER,1818 4th Street, Richlands, Va. Appli-cant's representative: Harry E. Dixon,Jr., P.O. Box 211, Roanoke, Va. Author-ity sought to operate as a contract car-rier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: (1) Blocks, such asbuilding (solid, hollow and perforated)not decorated, enameled, or glazed(other than soft glazed, individual blocksnot being packed), or otherwise coated,condensing (including condensing rings),facing (solid, hollow and perforated),not enameled or glazed except as pro-vided for below, filter bed (solid, hollowand perforated), shale and fire clay,paving, shale and, fire clay, Polyester,glazed, salt glazed, segment (vitrified),and silo; (2) brick, such as building(solid, hollow and perforated) notenameled or glazed except as providedfor below, cinder cement, facing (solid,hollow and perforated), not enameled orglazed except as provided for below,paving, shale and fire clay, salt, glazed,sand, cement, sand, lime, slag lime, andzinc and lead, glazed; (3) clay, such ascrude clay and ground clay; (4) claycondensing balls; (5) condulits," notlined, clay or shale and clay and cementcombined (will not apply on conduitshaving bell ends); (6) curbing clay andshale, street (vitrified); -(7) slabs, suchas slabs (including silo slabs), clay andshale, not enameled, not roofing or orna-mental, loaded loose in cars, or packedin crates, or barrels, not individuallypacked, shipped in the same manner asbuilding or facing brick; (8) tile, such asclay, hollow building, salt, lead and zinc,glazed, when shipped in the same man-ner as building or facing brick, individualtile not being packed; fire-proofing, fire-proofing and hollow building, broken,crushed or ground, hollow building, notdecorated, enameled, glazed (other thansalt, lead or zinc glazed, individual tilenot being packed) or otherwise coated,promenade and quarry, when packed infiberboard cartons with double-faced

.strawboard partitions or filters, or whenpacked in wooden crates; (9) concreteand mortar mixes; (10) flue lining; and(11) wall coping, from Richlands, Va.,.topoints in West Virginia (except pointswithin 75 miles of Richland, Va.), thatpart of Kentucky on and east of a linebeginning at the Kentucky-Ohio Stateline and extending along U.S. Highway25 to Lexington, Ky., thence along U.S.Highway 27 to junction Kentucky High-way 34, near Bryantsville, Ky., thencealong.Kentucky Highway 34 to Danville,

12028


Ky., and thence along Kentucky High-way 35 to the Kentucky-Tennessee Stateline, that part of Tennessee on and eastof Tennessee Highway 28, that part ofNorth Carolina on and west of U.S. High-way 1, and that part of Virginia on andwest of U.S. Highway 15 (except pointswithin 75 miles of Richlands, Va.), andrejected and refused shipments of theabove-specified commodities on returnmovements.

No. MC 113434 (Sub-No. 10), filed No-vember 16, 1962. Applicant: GRA-BELLTRUCK LINE, INC., 679 Lincoln Avenue,Holland, Mich. Applicant's attorney:Wilhelinina Boerama, 2850 PenobscotBuilding, Detroit 26, Mich. Authoritysought to operate as a common carrier,by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,transporting: Grape juice, in bulk, fromSodus, Mich., to Chicago, Ill., Birming-ham, Ala., Houston, Tex., and points inNew York.

No. MC 116282 (Sub-No. 6), filed No-vember 20, 1962. Applicant: ONILE P.FRANCOEUR, doing business as NEIL'SBAKERY PRODUCTS TRANSPORTA-TION CO., 246 Broad Street, Auburn,Maine. Applicant's attorney: Mary E.Kelley, 10 Tremont Street, Boston, Mass.Authority sought to operate as a contractcarrier, by motor vehicle, over irregularroutes, transporting: (1) Bakery prod-ucts, from Boston, Mass., to Hampton,N.H., and (2) potato chips, from Marble-head, Mass., to Bangor, Biddeford, Lewis-ton, and Portland, Maine, and returnedproducts of the commodities specifiedabove in (1) and (2) on return.

NoTE: Applicant states the proposed serv-ice as shown above, will be performed undera continuing contract with Drake Bakeries,Inc., and Winslow Chip Co., Inc., respec-tively.

MOTOR CARRIER OF PASSENGERS

No. MC 74 (Sub-No. 5), filed Septem-ber 10, 1962. Applicant: ORANGEBALL BUS COMPANY, INC., P. 0. Box72, First State Bank Building, Mission,Tex. Applicant's attorney: MertStarnes, 401 Perry-Brooks Building,Austin 1, Tex. Authority sought tooperate as a common carrier, by motorvehicle, over regular routes, transport-ing: Passengers and their baggage, andexpress and newspapers, in the same ve-hicle with passengers, (1) between Ma-dero, Tex., and the port of entry on theboundary between the United Statesand Mexico at Anzalduas Dam, fromMadero, Tex., over Farm-to-MarketRoad 1016 and unnumbered county roadsto the boundary of the/United Statesand Mexico at Anzalduas Dam, and re-turn over the same route serving all ii-termediate points, (2) between Mission,Tex., and the junction of Farm-to-Mar-ket Road 1016 and Farm-to-Mar-ket Road 1926, from Mission, Tex., overFarm-to-Market Road 1016 to its junc-tion with Farm-to-Market Road 1926,and return over the same route servingall intermediate points, and (3) betweenMadero, Tex., and the junction of Farm-to-Market Road 1016 and Farm-to-Market Road 1926, from Madero, Tex.,over Farm-to-Market Road 1016 and un-numbered county road to Granjeno, Tex.,thence over unnumbered county road to

FEDERAL REGISTER

the junction of Farm-to-Market Road494 and Faxm-to-Market Road 1016,thence over Farm-to-Market Road 1016to its junction with Farm-to-MarketRoad 1926, and return over the sameroute, serving all intermediate points.

NOTE: Applicant states that it presentlyholds authority between Mission and theport of entry on the International Boundaryat or near Hidalgo "over county road" andU.S. Highway 281, serving the intermediatepoints of Madero, Granjeno and Hidalgo.No duplicating authority is sought.

No. MC 74 (Sub-No. 6), filed Septem-ber 13, 1962. Applicant: ORANGEBALL BUS CO., INC., P.O. Box 72, FirstState Bank Building, Mission, Tex. Ap-plicant's attorney: Mert Starnes, 401Perry-Brooks Building, Austin 1, Tex.Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over regu-lar routes, transporting: Passengersand their baggage, and express andnewspapers, in the same vehicle withpassengers, between Ports of Entry onthe International Boundary line betweenthe United States and Mexico located ator near Los Ebanos, Tex. and Mission,Tex., from the Port of Entry on the In-ternational Boundary line between theUnited States and Mexico located at ornear Los Ebanos, Tex., over Farm-to-Market Road 886 to its junction withU.S. Highway 83, thence over U.S. High-way 83 to Havana, Tex., thence over un-numbered county road and Farm-to-Market Road 2521, via Tobasco, Tex.,and Bleakley, Tex., to LaJoya, Tex.,thence over U.S. Highway 83 to its junc-tion with Farm-to-Market Road 1427,thence over Farm-to-Market Road 1427,via Penitas, Tex., and Abram, Tex., toits junction with U.S. Highway 83,thence over U.S. Highway 83 to Mission,Tex., and return over the same route,serving the termini and all intermediatepoints except those intermediate pointslocated on U.S. Highway 83.

No. MC 116851 (Sub-No 1), filed No-vember 23, 1962. Applicant: BERNARDF. DUFFY AND AVERY 0. PERHAM,a partnership, doing business as DUFFY& PERHAM BUS LINES, Belmont Road,Malone, N.Y. Applicant's attorney:John J. Brady, Jr., 75 State Street, Al-bany 7, N.Y. Authority sought to operateas a common carrier, by motor vehicle,over irregular routes, transporting: Pas-sengers and their baggage, in the samevehicle with passengers, in round-trip"charter operations, (1) beginning andending at Massena and Brasher Falls, St.Lawrence County, N.Y., and extending tothe port of entry on the United States-Canada boundary line at or near Roose-veltown, N.Y., and (2) beginning andending at points in Franklin County,N.Y., and extending-to the port of entryon the United States-Canada boundaryline at or near Fort Covington, N.Y.

NoTICE OF FILING OF PETITION

No. MC 57591 (Sub-No. 4) (PETITIONFOR INTERPRETATION, CLARIFICA-TION, AND/OR ISSUANCE OF COR-RECTED OPERATING AUTHORITY-PORTION), filed November 16, 1962.Petitioner: ALBERT L. EVANS, doingbusiness as EVANS DELIVERY CO.Petitioner's representative: George. A.

12029

Olsen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City 6,N.Y. On October 18, 1948 Petitioner wasissued a Certificate in No. MC 57591(Sub-No. 4), which read as follows asfar as pertinent in this petition (sheetNo. 1): General commodities, exceptthose of unusual value, and except dan-gerous explosives, household goods asdefined in Practices of Motor CommonCarriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C.467, commodities in bulk, and thoserequiring special equipment, BetweenPottsville, Pa., and Easton, Pa.: FromPottsville over certain specified highwaysto Easton, and return over the sameroute. Service is authorized to and fromall intermediate points and off-routepoints within 5 miles of Pottsville, Pa.Again, on September 17, 1958, anotherCertificate was issued to Petitioner, inpart, which reads: "General commod-ities, except those of unusual value, ClassA and B explosives, household goods, asdefined by the Commission, commoditiesin bulk, and those requiring specialequipment, Between Pottsville, Pa., andEaston, Pa., serving all intermediate andoff-route points within five miles ofPottsville .. " By the instant petition,petitioner states, among other things,that for the past 14 years it has beenserving all intermediate points betweenPottsville, Pa., and Easton, Pa.; and thatthe Report and Recommended order,served July 1 19, 1948, recommended,"serving all intermediate points, and off-route points within five miles of Potts-ville, Pa. Petitioner prays that the Com-mission review the facts and issue a newCertificate in line with the orignal ap-plication and the findings of the Exam-iner in the Report and RecommendedOrder. Any person or persons desiringto oppose the relief sought by the instantpetition, may, within 30 days from thedate of this publication in the FEDERALREGISTER, file an appropriate pleading.

NOTICE OF FILING OF PETITIONS SEEKING

MODIFICATION OF COMMODITY DESCRIP-TION IN PERTINENT ACTIVE OPERATING

AUTHORITY HELD BY PETITIONERS

No. MC 110420, and (Sub-Nos. 81, 109,115, 117, 132, 151, 166, 188, 192, 194,203, 245, 252, and 285), filed October 31,1962, published FEDERAL REGISTER, issueof November 15, 1962, and republished ascorrected this issue. Petitioner: QUAL-ITY CARRIERS, INC., Burlington, Wis.Petitioner's attorney: James K. Knud-son, 1903 N Street NW., Washington 6,D.C. The purpose of this republicationis to correct Sub No. 203, inadvertentlyshown in previous notice as Sub No. 204.The correct Sub number is Sub 203.

APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OR PER-mITs WHIcn ARE To BE PROCESSED CON-CURRENTLY WITH APPLICATIONS UNDERSECTION 5 GOVERNED BY SPECIAL RULE1.240 TO THE EXTENT APPLICABLE

No. MC 29116 (Sub-No. 13) (AMEND-MENT), filed October 28, 1962, pub-lished FEDERAL REGISTER issue November7, 1962, amended November 23, 1962, andrepublished as amended this issue. Ap-plicant: DIRECT TRANSPORTS, INC.,801 East l7th Street, Kansas City 8, Mo.Applicant's attorney: Lee Reeder, 1221Baltimore Avenue, Kansas City 5, Mo.

2NOTICES'

Authority sought to operate as a com-mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir-regular routes, transporting: Generalcommodities, (except those of unusualvalue, Classes A and B explosives, house-hold goods as defined by the Commis-sion, commodities in bulk, commoditiesrequiring special equipment, and thoseinjurious or contaminating to other lad-ing), (A) between St. Joseph, Mo., onthe one hand, and, on the other, pointsin Iowa, Kansas and Nebraska, withthrough 'service between points in thethree States via the St. Joseph, Mo.,gateway, and (B) between Kansas City,Mo.-Kansas, on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in Iowa and Nebraska,with through service between points inthe two States via the Kansas City, Mo.-Kansas, gateway.

Nor: As a change of gateway from KingCity, Mo., to St. Joseph, Mo., and KansasCity, Mo.-Kansas, in connection with No.MC-F 8196, Southwest Fleight Lines, Inc-Control-Direct Transports, Inc. The pur-pose of this application as amended is tochange the gateway upon two conditions:(1) That Southwest Freight Lines, Inc. ispermitted to acquire control of Direct Trans-ports, Inc., and (2).that Southwest FreightLines, Inc.'s presently issued Certificates,No. MC-29566 and Subs, be amended to elimi-nate therefrom the authority of SouthwestFreight Lines to transport properly over ir-regular routes between St. Joseph, Mo., andKansas City, Mo., on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in Iowa; also between St.Joseph, Mo., on the one hand, and, on theother, points in Kansas, over irregular routes.

No. MC 115523 (Sub-No. 112), filedNovember 30, 1962. Applicant: CLARKTANK LINES COMPANY, a corporation,1450 North Beck Street, Salt Lake City,Utah. Applicant's attorney: Bruce R.Geernaert, 100 Bush Street, San Fran-cisco 4, Calif. Authority sought to op-erate as a common carrier, by motor ve-hicle, over irregular routes, transporting:Cement, in bulk, during the season ex-tending from March 1 to October 31, bothinclusive, of each year, from mountainHome, Idaho, and points within five (5)miles thereof, to Mountain Home AirForce Base, Idaho, and points within ten(10) miles thereof.

NOTE: This application is a matter di-rectly related to MC-F 8110, published Fxa-ERAL EGISTER issue March 28,1962.

APPLICATIONS UNDER SECTIONS 5 AND210a(b)

The following applications are gov-erned by the Interstate Commerce Com-mission's special rules governing noticeof filing of applications by motor carriersof property or passengers under section5(a) and 210a(b) of the Interstate Com-merce Act and certain other proceedingswith respect thereto. (49 CFR 1.240.)

MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY

No. MC-F-8275 (THE AMERICANTRANSFER CO.-LEASE-FRANKCHARLES MVARTIN AND ROBERTEARL MARTIN), published in the No-vember 7,1962 issue of the FEDERAL REG-ISTER on page 10879. Supplement filedNovember 21, 1962, to show joinder ofLLOYD WATNER, Stevenson, Maryland;as person in bontrol of the vendee cor-poration.

No. MC-F-8289. Authoritysought forpurchase by PENBROOK HAULINGCOMPANY, INC., P.O. Box 1551, Harris-burg, Pa., of a portion of the operatingrights of WILL"AMC. BONNER, INC.,Room 200, 95 East Fairmont Avenue,Philadelphia 23, Pa., and for acquisitionby R. L. BAILEY, 235 South West Street,Carlisle, Pa., D. E. LUTZ, 330 Washing-ton Lane, Carlisle, Pa., H. B. LUTZ andU. D. LUTZ, both of 217 North HanoverStreet, Carlisle, Pa., of control of suchrights through the purchase. Applicants'attorney: Christian V. Graf,- 407 NorthFront Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Operat-ing rights sought to be transferred: Suchcommodities as contractors' equipment,heavy and bulky articles, machinery andmachine parts, and articles requiringspecialized handling or rigging becauseof size or weight, as a common carrierover irregular routes, between points inPennsylvania, within 150 miles of Phil-adelphia, Pa., in the counties of Snyder,Juniata, Perry, Cumberland, Franklin,-Adams and Dauphin, Pa., on the onehand, and, on the other, points in NewYork, New Jersey, Delaware and Mary-land. Vendee is authorized to operatein all states except, Alaska and Hawaii.Application has not been filed'for tem-porary authority under section 210a(b).

No. MC-F-8290. Authority sought forcontrol by ARTHUR N. ANDERS, Box230, Lansdale, Pa., of JETWAY, INC.,320 West Main Street, Lansdale, Pa. Ap-plicant's representative: John W. Frame,603 North Front Street, Harrisburg, Pa.Operating rights sought to be controlled:Machinery, as a common carrier overirregular routes, between points in Penn-sylvania on and east of U.S. Highway15 (except points in Pennsylvania onand east of U.S. Highway 15 in Adams,York, Cumberland, Perry, Dauphin,Lebanon, and Lancaster Counties, Pa.,and except points in Pennsylvania onand east of U.S. Highway 15 and northof the East Branch of the SusquehannaRiver in Tioga, Bradford, Lycoming, Sul-livan, Union, Snyder, Northumberland,Montour, and Columbia' Counties, Pa.),on the one hand, and, on the other,points in Massachusetts, Connecticut,Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey,Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, NorthCarolina,'Ohio, and the District of Co-lumbia; building construction materialswhich, because of size or weight requirethe use of special equipment or specialhandling, between 'Wilkes-Barre, Pa.,and points within 10 miles of Wilkes-Barre, on the one hand, and, on theother, points in New York, New. Jersey,Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massa-"chusetts. ARTHUR N. ANDERS holdsno authority from this Commission.However, he controls, NORTH PENNTRANSFER, INC., Routes 63- and 202,P.O. Box 230, Lansdale, Pa., which is au-thorized to operate as a common carrierin Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland,New Jersey, New- Yqrk, Massachusetts,Rhode Island, Connecticut, Virginia, andthe District of Columbia. Applicationhas not been filed for, temporary au-thority under section 210a(b)..

No. MC-F-8291. Authority sought forpurchase by GENERAL DELIVERY,INC., 36 East Grafton Road, P.O. Box

1816; Fairmont, W. Va., of the operating'rights of R. C. LYNCH, doing businessas LYNCH'S TRANSER & STORAGECOMPANY, Shinnston, W. Va., and foracquisition-by WALTER P. THOMPSON,36 East Grafton Road, Fairmount, W.Va., of control of such rights throughthe purchase. Applicants' attorney: S.Harrison Kahn, Suite 733, InvestmentBuilding, Washington 5, D.C. Operatingrights sought to be transferred: Generalcommodities, excepting, among others,household goods and commodities inbulk, as a common carrier over irregularroutes, between points in West -Virginiawithin 25 miles 'of Shinnston, W. Va.,including Shinnstn. Vendee is author-ized to operate as a common, carrier inWest Virginia, Maryland, New York,Ohio, Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsyl-vania, Kentucky, and the District ofColumbia. Application has not beenfiled for temporary authority undersection 210a(b).

No. MC-F-8293. Authority sought forpurchase by SECURITY VAN LINES,INC., 120 West Airline Highway, Kenner,La., of the operating rights of COIVIMU-NITY & JOHNSON CORPORATION, 227Grand Avenue, Palisades Park, N.J., andfor acquisition by SECURITY TRANS-PER COMPANY, INCORPORATED, 120West Airline Highway, Kenner, La., and,in turn, by HOWARD WOLCHANSKY,2035 Jefferson Avenue, New Orleans, La.,of control of such rights through thepurchase. Applicants' attorney: W. T.Croft, 1815 H Street NW., Washington,D.C. Operating rights sought to betransferred: Household. goods as definedby the Commission, as a common carrierover irregular routes, between points inMaine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Mas-sachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut,New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,and Delaware, and between points inMaine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Mas-sachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut,New York, -New Jersey, Pennsylvania,and Delaware, on the one hand, and, onthe other, points in Ohio, Indiana, Illi-nois, Michigan, Missouri, Maryland, WestVirginia, Virginia, North Carolina, SouthCarolina, Georgia, Florida, an cLthe Dis-trict of Columbia. Vendee is authorizedto operate as a common carrier in Flor-ida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tex-as, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Tennessee,Arizona, California, Oregon, Washington,Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, South Caro-lina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland,New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, andthe District of Columbia. Applicationhas not been filed for temporary author-ity under section 210a(b).

No. MC-F-8294. Authority sought formerger into CROUCH BROS., INC.,Transport Building; St. Joseph, Mo., ofthe operating rights and property ofJACKSON TRUCK LINE, INC., P.O. BoX496, Topeka, Kans., and for acquisitionby OVID CROUCH, ARTHUR CROUCH,CLEO CROUCH, • GEORGE KEEFER,and RUBY. KNIK, all of TransportBuilding, St. Joseph, Mo., of control ofsuch rights, and property through thetransaction. Applicants' attorney: Clar-ence D. Todd, 1825 Jefferson Place NW.,Washington 6, D.C. Operating rightssought to be merged: General commod-

12030


ities, excepting, among others, householdgoods and commodities in bulk, as acommon carrier over regular routes, be-tween St. Joseph, Mo., and Shambaugh,Iowa, serving certain intermediate andoff-route points; general commodities,excepting, among others, commodities inbulk but not excepting household goods,over irregular routes, between Clearmont,Mo., and points in Missouri, and Iowawithin 20 miles of Clearmont (exceptMaryville and Tarkio, Mo.) on the onehand, and, on the other, points in Mis-souri, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas. RE-STRICTION: The service authorized un-der the above-described regular-routeauthority shall not be combined with theservice authorized under the above-described irregular route authority.CROUCH BROS., INC., is authorized tooperate as a common carrier, in Missouri,Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska,Arkansas, and Oklahoma. Applicationhas not been filed for temporary author-ity under section 210a(b).

No. MC-F-8295. Authority sought forpurchase by KROBLIN REFRIGER-ATED XPRESS, INC., Post Office Box218, Suffiner, Iowa, of the operatingrights and property of OLENDA M.KROBLIN (ALLEN E. KROBLIN, EX-ECUTOR), Post Office Box 218, Sumner,Iowa, and for acquisition by ALLEN E.KROBLIN, MILDRED KROBLIN, bothof 715 West Sixth Street, Sumner, Iowa,and LOYAL FRISCH, 206 South MapleStreet, Sumner, Iowa, of control of suchrights and property through the pur-chase. Applicants' attorneys: Stockton,Linville, Lewis & Mitchell, The 1650Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo.Operating rights sought to be trans-ferred: Dressed poultry, as a commoncarrier over irregular routes, from Sum-ner, Iowa, to Chicago, Ill.; dairy prod-ucts, as defined in the appendix to thereport in Modification of Permits-Packing House Products, 46 M.C.C. 23,and live poultry, from Sumner, NewHampton, Tripoli, Fredericksburg, andIonia, Iowa, to Chicago, i1., and Mil-waukee, Wis. (except dressed poultryfrom Sumner to Chicago), from-Kenyon,LeRoy, and Hayfield, Minn., to Sumnerand New Hampton, Iowa, and from Kas-son, Minn., to Sumner, Iowa; automobileparts, accessories, and tires, lubricatingoils and greases in containers, and poul-try boxes, crates, and egg cases, fromChicago, Ill., to Sumner, Iowa; bindertwine, from Chicago, Rock Island, Mo-line, and East Moline, Ill., Milwaukee,Wis., and Stillwater, Minn., to Sumner,Iowa, and points within 25 miles of Sum-ner; butter and creamery products 'fromBuck Creek, Climax, Spring Fountain,Excelsior, Richfield, Westgate, and Ger-man, Iowa, to Sumner, Iowa; chemicals,including acids in carboys and metalcontainers, from Chicago, Joliet, andOttawa, Ill., and East Chicago and Ham-mond, Ind., to Sumner, Iowa; coal, fromSumner, Iowa, to points in Bremer andFayette Counties, Iowa; creamery ma-chinery, equipment, parts, and supplies,from St. Paul, Minneapolis, Owatonna,and Winona, Minn., and Melrose Park,Belvidere, and Chicago, Ill., to Sumner,Iowa; dairy products, as defined in- theappendix to the report in Modification of

No. 235-7

FEDERAL REGISTER

Permits-Packing House Products, 46M.C.C. 23, from points in that part ofIowa on and east of U.S. Highway 71from the Iowa-Minnesota State line tojunction Iowa Highway 92, and on andnorth of a line extending along- IowaHighway 92 from junction U.S. High-way 71 to junction unnumbered high-way (formerly Iowa Highway 92) nearWest Chester, Iowa, thence along un-numbered highway to Washington, Iowa,and thence along Iowa Highway 92 tothe Iowa-Illinois State line, to Dubuque,Calmar, Charles City, Iowa Falls, andManchester, Iowa; farm machinery,farm machinery parts, farm implements,and hardware, from Chicago, Rock Falls,Sandwich, Moline, East Moline, RockIsland, and Sterling, Ill., and Racineand Milwaukee, Wis., to Sumner, Iowa,and points within 25 miles of Sumner(Except Waterloo and Jesup, Iowa);feed and tankage, from Chicago, Forest

-Park, and Riverdale, Ill., Austin, AlbertLea, St. Paul, and Minneapolis, Minn.,to Sumner, Iowa, and points within 25miles of Sumner; livestock, from Sum-ner, Iowa, and points within 25 miles ofSumner, to certain points in Min-nesota, Illinois, and Wisconsin; newfurniture, from Chicago, 1l., and St.Paul and Minneapolis, Minn., to Sumner,Iowa; sugar, salt, flour, feed, and lime,from Sumner, Iowa, to points in Bremerand Fayette Counties, Iowa; windmillsand windmill pumps, and parts and sup-plies, from Evansville, Wis., to Sumner,Iowa, and points within 25 miles of Sum-ner. Vendee is authorized to operateas a common carrier in Illinois, Iowa,Missouri, Indiana, Oklahoma, Kansas,Colorado, Nebraska, Arkansas, Texas,Ohio, Michigan, New York, Pennsyl-vania, Minnesota, South Dakota, Wis-consin, Florida, New Jersey, Massachu-setts, Maryland, Delaware, California,Virginia, South Carolina, Maine, NewHampshire, Vermont, Connecticut,Rhode Island, North Dakota, Alabama,Tennessee, and the District of Columbia.Application has not been filed for tem-porary authority under section 210a(b).

No. MC-F-8296. Authority sought forpurchase by JONES MOTOR CO., INC.,Bridge Street and Schuylkill Road,Spring City, Pa., of the operating rightsand property of GEORGE E. STEWART,doing business as STEWART'S EX-PRESS, 204 Lorewood Avenue, Wilming-ton, Del., and for acquisition by WM. S.JONES, R.D. 2, Phoenixville, Pa., R. C.JONES, JR., 1304 Monroe Street, Wyo-missing, Pa., H. ELLIS JONES, 440 High-land Road, Pottstown, Pa., ALVINJONES, 3053 Tremont Street, Allentown,Pa., H. A. HERSHEY, 751 Spruce Street,Royersford, Pa., and MARK R. HERR,R.D. 2, Collegeville, Pa., of control ofsuch rights and property through thepurchase. Applicants' attorney: RolandRice, Rice, Carpenter & Carraway, 618Perpetual Building, Washington 4, D.C.,and applicants' representative: H. A.Hershey, Vice President, Jones MotorCo., Inc., Spring City, Pa. Operatingrights sought to be transferred: Generalcommodities, excepting, among others,household goods and commodities inbulk, as a common carrier over -regularroutes, between Wilmington, Del., andRising Sun, Md., serving all intermediate

12031

points and the off-route point of KennettSquare, Pa., between Wilmington; Del.,and junction U.S. Highway 1 andMaryland Highway 273, serving all inter-mediate points and the off-route pointof Elkton, Md., between Philadelphia,Pa., and Wilmington, Del., serving allintermediate points; general commodi-ties, with the above-noted exceptions,over irregular routes, between points inDelaware, those in Pennsylvania on andeast of U.S. Highway 122 from the Penn-sylvania-Maryland State line, to junc-tion U.S. Highway 30, and, on and southof U.S. Highway 30, from junction U.S.Highways 30 and 122 to the Pennsyl-vania-New Jersey State line (includingPhiladelphia), and Aberdeen and Havrede Grace, Md., and points in Marylandeast of the Susquehanna River andChesapeake Bay (except between pointswhich regular service is authorizedabove). RESTRICTION: The serviceauthorized hereinabove is restrictedto the transportation of shipments onthe above-described regular and irregu-lar route operations which move from,to, or through Wilmington; from Wil-mington, Del., to points in that part ofNew Jersey on and south of .U.S. High-way 40, and on and west of a line begin-ning at Pittsgrove, N.J., and extendingalong New Jersey Highway 46 to Bridge-ton, N.J., thence in a southeasterly direc-tion to Beaden Point, N.J.; pyrotechnics,from, Bear, Del., to Berwick, Pa., andpoints in New Jersey, Maryland, andthose in that part of Pennsylvania within50 miles of the Philadelphia City Hall;automobile skid chains, from York, Pa.,to Wilmington, Del. Vendee is author-ized to operate as a common carrier inNew Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York,Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts,Rhode Island, Delaware, Michigan, Ohio,Illinois, Indiana, West Virginia, and theDistrict of Columbia. Application hasbeen filed for temporary authorityunder section 210a(b).

MOTOR CARRIER OF PASSENGERS

No. MC-F-8292. Authority sought forcontrol by NATIONAL CITY LINES,INC., 3500 Prudential Plaza, Chicago, Ill.,of TRENTON PHILA. COACH CO., 132Perry Street, Trenton, N.J. Applicants'attorney: Peter Platten, 1035 Land TitleBuilding, Philadelphia 10, Pa. Operatingrights sought to be controlled: Passen-gers and their baggage, and express, inthe same vehicle with passengers, as acommon carrier over regular routes, be-tween Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton,N.J., between Falsington, Pa., and junc-tion Pennsylvania Highway 152 and Lin-coln Highway (U.S. Highway 1) nearPenndel, Pa., between junction U.S.Highway 1 and Township Road 339, nearMorrisville, Pa., and Fallsington, Pa.,between junction Township Road 337and Pennsylvania State Road 09018(Trenton Avenue), and junction Town-ship Road 333 and Newportville Road,between junction U.S.OHighway 1 andunnumbered road, 1% miles east of Ox-ford Valley, and junction unnumberedroad and Pennsylvania State Road 09018(Trenton Avenue), and between junctionU.S. Highway 1 and Pennsylvania StateRoad 09017, in Oxford Valley, Pa., and

12032- , NOTICES.

junction Township Road 333 and Penn- Carolina Sleepwear. .orp., Weldon, N.C-; the total number of factory production work-sylvania State Road 09018, serving all effective 11-21-62 to 11-2063 (lacies' sleep- ers for normal labor turnover purposesintermediate points. NATIONAL CITY wear). (seamless).Henson Garment Co., 450 East HancockLINES, INC., holds no authority from Avenue, Athens, Ga.; -effectie 11-19-62 to Regulations Applicable to the Employ-this Commission. However, it is affiliated 11-18-63 (men's work pants, shirts and ment of Learners (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9,with Los Angeles-Seattle Motor Express, jackets). as amended).Inc., 3200 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, Jaymie Dresses, Inc., 1 Coffin Avenue, New The following learner certificates wereWash., which is authorized to operate as Bedford, Mass.; effective 11-20-62 to 11-19-63a common carrier in California, Wash- (women's rayon, cotton and wool dresses). _ issued in Puerto Rico to the companies

ington and Oregon. Application has Livingston Shirt Corp., 308 South Churcl hereinafter named. The effective andbeen filed for temporary authority under Street, Livingston, Tenn.; effective 11-14-62, expiration dates, learner rates, occupa-section 210a(b).to 11-13-63 (men's dress and sport shirts tions, learning periods, and the numbersectin 210~b).and pajamas).

NoTE: A motion to dismiss has been filed Prairie Manufacturing Co., East Prairie, or proportion of learners authorized tosimultaneously with the above application Mo.; effective 12-5-62 to 12-4-63 (men's and be employed, are as indicated.for lack of jifrisdiction. boys' pants). Beatrice Needle Craft, Inc., 60 ComercloPublix Tennessee Corp., Huntingdon, Street, Mayaguez, P.R.; effective 11-1-62 to

By the Commission, Tenn.; effective 12-1-62 to 11-30-63 (menl's" 10-31-63; 20-learners for normal labor turn-[SEA] ]kROL D.MCCO, . and boys' sport shirts).[SEALHVanderbilt Shirt Co., 29-1 Walnut Street, over purposes, in the occupation of sewing

Secretary. aebil machine operator for a learning period of 480Asheville, N.C.; effective 11-14-62 To 11-13-63 hours at the rates of 81 cents an hour for

[FR. Doe. 62-12008; Filed, Dec. 4, 1962; (men's western and sport shirts; 'ladies' and the first 320 hours and 90 cents an hour for8:50 am.] boys' shirts), - the remaining 160 hours (brassieres).

The following learner certificates were Billfold Corp. of America, Gurabo, P.R.;issued for normal labor turnover pur- effective 10--29-62 to 4-28-63; 29 learners for

rftRwsREST A " poses. The effective and expiration plant expansion purposes, in the occupationsof: (1) stitching machine operator for adates and the number of learners au- learning period of 320 hours at the rates of

thorized are indicated. 53 cents an hour for the first 160 hours andWage and Hour Blain Products, Inc., Blain, Pa.; effective 61 cents an hour for the remaining 160 hours;

CERTIFICATES AUTHORIZING EM- 11-19-62 to 11-18-63; four learners (ladies' (2) die and clicker machine operator (cut-sleepwear). ting); creasing machine operator; skiving

PLOYMENT OF LEARNERS AT SPE- Checotah Manufacturing Co., Checotah, machine operator and assembler, each for aCIAL MINIMUM RATES Okla.; effective 11-16-62 to 11-15-63 (wom- learning period of 160 hours at the rate of

ei's and children's peddlepushers and chil- '53 cents an hour (billfolds and purses).Notice is hereby given that pursuant dren's shorts). . Billfold, Corp. of America, Gurabo, P.R.;

to section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards . Elloree Garment Corp., Main Street, Elloree, effective 10-29-62 to 10-28-63; 16 learners for

Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1060, as amended, S.C.; effective 11-14-62 to 11-13-63; 10 learn- normal labor turnover purposes, in the oc-29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and Adninistra- ers (ladies' pajamas and gowns). - • ._ cupations of: (1) stitching machine opeYator

Hollywood Vassarette, West Railroad Ave-;. for a learning period of 320 hours at the rates -

tive Order'No. 561 (27'F1.R. 4001) the nue, Princeton, Ill.; effective 11-22--62 to of 53 cents an hour for the first 160 hoursfirms listed in this notice have been 11-21-63; 10 learners (womens' girdles), and 61 cents an hour for the remaining 160issued special certificates authorizing-the Jo Ann Dress Manufacturing, Lovell Park,. hours; (2)'die and clicker machine operatoremployment of learners at hourly wage Ebensburg, Pa.; effective 11-25-62 to 11-24-63: '(cutting); creasing machine operator; -skiv-rates lower than the minimum wage 10 learners (women's dresses). Ing machine operator and assembler, each forrates otherwise applicable under section -Meyers & Son Manufacturing Co.,' Inc. a learning period of 160 hours at the rate ofrof the Act. The effective and exiora- New Castle, Ky.; effective 11-16-62 to 1-15 53 cents an hour (billfolds and purses).6of dtes Acpationsectige adten - 63; 10 learners (men's one piece work'suits). " Savage Arms Inc., Star Route Number 55-ion dates, occupations, wage rates, num-' North Country Manufacturing Corp., Tup- Minillas, Bayamon, P.R.; effective-10-29--62 to

ber or proportion of learners, learning -per Lake, N.Y.; effective 11-20-62 to 11-19-63; 4-28-63; 35 learners for plant expansion ljur-periods, and the principal product man- 10 learners (women's dresses). , poses, in the occupations of machine op-ufactured by the employer for certifi- 'Sagamore Garment Corp., Sagamore, Mass.; erator; finisher and final assembler; each forcates issued under general learner regu- effective 11-20-62 to 11-19-63; 10 learners a learning period of 480 hours at the rates oflations (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9) are as (women's rayon cotton and wool dresses). .87 cents an hour for the -first 240 hours andina below C ondi22.1tons22proved , Smart Style, Inc., Country Club Drive, $1.01' an hour for the remaining 240 hours

Asheboro, N.C.; effective 11-20-62 to 11-19-63;' (firearms).in certificates issued under the supple- 10 'learners. Learners may not be employed Sun Manufacturing Inc., Mayaguez, P.R. -mental industry regulations cited in the at special minimum wages in the production effective 10-22-62 to 1-9-63; 78 learners for.captions below are as established in those of separate skirts (children's outerwear)., plant expansion purposes, in any factory pro-regulations. Sorbeau Juvenile Manufacturing Co., 821_ ductive occupation (with certain exceptions),

Apparel Industry Learner Regulations Central Avenue, Dubuque, Iowa; effective each for a learning pdrlod of 480 hours at the(29 CPR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended, and 12-1-62 to 11-30-63; 10 learners (infants' rates of 72 cents an hour for the first- 24029 CPR 522.20 to 522.25, as amended), layette garments). hours and 81 cents an hour for the remain-

.Howard B. Wolf, Inc., 101 Sanders Street, ing 240 hours (canvas uppers for vulcanizedThe following learner certificates wer Bowie, Tex.; effective 11-19-62 to 11-18-63; shoes).Issued authorizing the employment Of 10 learners (ladies' dresses). Isabela Vieques Corp., Isabel Segunda,10 percent of the total number of fac- Vieques, PR.; effective 10-23-62 to 10-22-63;tory production workers for normal The following learner certificates were 10 learners for normal labor turnover pur-'

issued for plant expansion purposes. The poses, in the occupations of: (1) sewing ma-labor turnover purposes. The effective effective and expiration dates and the chine'operator for-a learning period of 480and expiration dates are indicated, " number of learners authorized are hours at the rates of 65 cents an hour for-th4

Abetta Sportswear, Inc., 331 Bonney Street, indicated. first 240 hours and 76 cents an hour for theNew Bedford, Mass.; effective 41-15-62 to remaining 240 hours; (2) final inspection. of11-14-63 (women's dresses). - Alamin Togs, Inc., 1701 Seventh Avenue, fully assembled garments and machine op-

Bayly Manufacturing Co., 2508 Fourth Ave- Huntington,. W. .Va.; effective 11-19-62 to erators other than sewing machine, each fornue, Greeley, Colo.; effective 11-19-62 to 5-.18-63; 45 learners (boys' slacks and shifts), a learning period of 160 hours at the rate of

11-18-63 (men's and boys' denim jeans). Wldon Manufacturing Co., Walnut, lss.; 65 cents an hour -(men's and boys' dressBayly Manufacturing Co., 21 West Viola, effective 11-15-62 to 5-14-63; 10 'learners shirts)'.

Yakima, Wash.; effective 11-19-62 to 11-18-63 (men's and boys' outerwear). - Isabela Vieques Corp., Isabel Segunda,(men's and women's denim work pants)-. Hosiery Industry Learner Regulations- Vieques, P.R.; effective 10-23-62 to 4-22-63;45 learners for plant expansIon purposesi "in

Blue Bell, Inc., Lenoir, N.C.; effective 12-1- '(29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended, and tle.oeaupation s of : (1) sewing macoe op-62 to 11-30-63 (men's and boys' denim cotton 29 CFR 522.40 to 522.43, as amended) e oupa n ing machine optrousers). eiator for a learning period of 480 hours at

Byrds ManufactuYring Corp., ByrdstownY - -Magnet Mills, Inc.,-Cullom Street, Cliiton, the rates of 65 cents an hour for the first 240Tenn.; effective 11-29-62 to 11-28-63 (men's, Tenn.; effective 11-29-62 to 11-28-63; five hours and 76 cents an hour for the remainingboys' and ladies' sport shirts), percent of the totalijumber of factory pro- 240 h'ours; (2) final inspection of fully as-

Cambria Dress Manufacturing Co., Inc, dUction workers for normal labor turnover sembled garments and machine operatorsWalter and Johnson Streets, Nanty Glo, Pa.; purposes (seamless and full-fashioned). other than sewing machine, each for a learn-effective 11-19-62 to 11-18-63 (women's Powell Knitting Co., Spartanburg, S.C.; ef- . Wig period of 160 hours at the rate of 65 centsdresses), fectlve 11-14-62 to 11-13-63; five percent of an hour (men's and boys"dress shirts).

Wednesday, December 5, 1962 FEDERAL REGISTER

Each learner certificate has been is-sued upon the representations of the em-ployer which, among other things, werethat employment of learners at specialminimum rates is necessary in order toprevent curtailment of opportunities foremployment, and that experienced work-ers for the learner occupations are notavailable. Any person aggrieved by theissuance of any of these certificates mayseek a review or reconsideration thereofwithin fifteen days after publication ofthis notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER pur-suant to the provisions of 29 CFR 522.9.The certificates may be annulled or with-drawn, as indicated therein, in the man-ner provided in 29 CFR, Part 528.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 23dday of November 1962.

ROBERT G. GRONEwALD,Authorized.Representative

of the Administrator.[P.R. Doe. 62-11934; Filed, Dec. 3, 1962;

8:48 am.]

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE-DECEMBER

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code ofFederal Regulations affected by documents published to date during December.

3 CFR Page

PROCLAMATIONS:3279 --------------------- 119853290 ---------------------- 119853328 --------------------- 119853386 ------------ 119853389 --------------------- 119853508 --------------------- 119133509 --------------------- 11985

EXECUTIVE ORDERS:11017 -------------------- 1184711069 -------------------- 11847

5 CFR6 --------------------------- 11989

6 CFR464 ------------------------- 11918

7 CFR719-- ---------------------- 11919724 ------------------------- 11919729 ------------------------- 11920905 -------------------- 11870,11871907 ------------------------- 11872949 ------------------------- 11872971 ------------------------- 119341125 ------------------------ 118731133 ------------------------ 118741136-------11874PROPOSED RULEs:

52 ---------------------- 11954728 --------------------- 11955811 --------------------- 11895959 ---------------------- 119981004 ------------- 119991010 --------------------- 119991048 --------------------- 119551130 --------------------- 11955

8 CFR252 ------------------------- 11875

9 CFR76 ----------------------------- 119351O1 01-------------------------- 11935

9 CFR-Continued Page

112 ------------------------- 11935117 ------------------------- 11936118 ------------------------- 11936119 ------------------------- 11937120 ------------------------- 11937

12 CFRPROPOSED RULES:

219 ---------------------- 12001334 ---------------------- 12000


121 ---------------------- 11973

14 CFR71 [New] ---------- 11938,11939,1198973 [New] -------------------- 1194175 [New] --------------- 11939,11989507 -------------------- 11990,11991PROPOSED RULES:

3 -------------------- 119994b ---------------------- 11999221 ---------------------- 11898600 ---------------- 11898,11970601 ----------- 11898,11900,11970602 ------------ 11898,11900,11901

15 CFR6 --------------------------- 11941

16 CFR13 ----------- 11875,11876,11991,11992

17 CR270 ------------------------- 11993

19 CFR24 ----------------------------- 11943

21 CFR3 __--------------------------- 11943121----------- 11876,11877,11944,11995141c --------------------------- 11944146c ------------------------ 11944PROPOSED RULES: '

121 ----------------- 11902,11999

26 CFR Page

1 ----------------- 11877,11881,11915301 ------------------------- 11881


522 ---------------------- 11968

32 CFR231 ------------------------- 11893751 ------------------------- 119461008 ------------------------ 11946

33 CFR203 ------------------------- 11995

38 CFR3 ----------------------- 11886,119956 --------------------------- 118938 --------------------------- 11893

41 CFR9-7 ------------------------- 11946

43 CFRPUBLIc LAND ORDERS:

712 --------------------- 11974861 ---------------------- 118942340 --------------------- 118942820 --------------------- 11894

46 CFR402 ------------------------- 11947

47 CFR0 ---------------------- 11948,119961 --------------------------- 119483 --------------- 1199618 -------------------------- 11950PROPOSED RULES:

1 --------------------- 11971,1199925 ---------------------- 11971

49 CFR -71-78 ----------------------- 11849PROPOSED RULES:

170 ----------------------- 12001

50 CFR33 -------------------------- 11952

12033

Pages FEl! EIiIISTEI

Documents

Transcript of Pages FEl! EIiIISTEI