Coal-fueled Pressurized Chemical Looping Combustion with a ...
Packed Bed Reactor Technology for Chemical-Looping Combustion 06/23 - S... · 2nd Int'l...
Transcript of Packed Bed Reactor Technology for Chemical-Looping Combustion 06/23 - S... · 2nd Int'l...
2nd Workshop
International Oxy-Combustion Research Network Hilton Garden Inn Windsor, CT, USA
25th and 26th January 2007
Hosted by:
Alstom Power Inc.
PRESENTATION - 18
Packed Bed Reactor Technology for Chemical-Looping Combustion
by: Sander Noorman University of Twente, The Netherlands
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 1
Packed Bed Reactor Technology for Chemical-Looping Combustion
S. Noorman, M. van Sint Annaland, J.A.M. Kuipers (UT)N.A.M. ten Asbroek, P.H.M. Feron (TNO)
2nd IEAGHG Oxyfuel Combustion Workshop25th and 26th of January 2007, Windsor, USA
2
Chemical-looping Combustion
• Power production with inherent CO2 separation• Direct contact between air and fuel is avoided
MeO
Me
Air
N2
CO2, H2O
Fuel
I II
I: 4 Me + 2 O2 → 4 MeO (∆H < 0)
II: 4 MeO + CH4 → 4 Me + CO2 + 2 H2O (∆H > 0)
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 2
3
Introduction
• Chemical-looping Combustion: Potential for very high CO2capture efficiencyNo energy penalty for separationNo NOx formationDirect implementation in power plants is challenging
• Important research themes:Oxygen carrier (MeO = NiO, Fe2O3, Mn3O4, CuO)Implementation in power plantReactor concepts
MeO
Me
Air
N2
CO2, H2O
Fuel
I II
I: 4 Me + 2 O2 → 4 MeO (∆H < 0)
II: 4 MeO + CH4 → 4 Me + CO2 + 2 H2O (∆H > 0)
MeO
Me
Air
N2
CO2, H2O
Fuel
I II
I: 4 Me + 2 O2 → 4 MeO (∆H < 0)
II: 4 MeO + CH4 → 4 Me + CO2 + 2 H2O (∆H > 0)
Oxidizing and reducing conditions must be imposed alternately
4
Air CH4
N2/O2
CO2/H2O
Air CH4
N2/O2
CO2/H2O
Reactor Concepts
Recirculation or stationary solids?
• Disadvantage of fluidization:Recirculation of particlesDifficult gas-solid separation (formation of fines)
• Packed bed (membrane-assisted) CLC:
Stationary solidsPeriodic switching of gas streamsDynamically operated parallel reactors (gas switching system)Natural gas → combined cycle!
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 3
5
Packed Bed CLC
• Process demands:Constant high-temperature air streamHigh overall and CO2 capture efficiencyContinuous operationExtreme conditions (Tout = 1300-1500 K, p = 20-30 bar)
• Packed bed CLC (UT): • Packed bed membrane-assisted CLC (TNO):
Air
CH4
N2/O2
CO2/H2O
(n ≥ 2)Air
CH4
N2/O2
CO2/H2O
(n ≥ 2)
6
Project Goal
• Evaluation of the feasibility of packed bed CLC as an alternative power production technology:
Can CLC be carried out using packed bed (membrane-assisted) technology?How can packed bed CLC with an optimal overall energy efficiency be realized?How does packed bed CLC perform, compared to fluidized bed CLC and other CO2 capture processes?
• This presentation:Modeling and experimental work on packed bed CLC.
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 4
7
Packed Bed CLC: Oxidation
Air
N2/O2
MeMeO
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Con
cent
ratio
n [-]
Axial position [m]O2MeO
• Oxidation cycle:Calculation of axial temperature and concentration profiles.Particle behavior is described using a two-zone model
8
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
Tem
pera
ture
at x
=L [K
]
Time [s]
• ‘No’ influence of reaction kinetics or flow rate• An air stream of high, constant temperature
is produced → gas turbine
Packed Bed CLC: Oxidation
Air
N2/O2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
Tem
pera
ture
[K]
Axial position [m]
• Oxidation cycle:Temperature evolution
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 5
9
Oxygen Carrier Properties
• Analytical approximation:Infinitely high reaction rateNo influence of conduction
• Temperature increase can be tuned:
Active content Support materialOxygen concentration
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.300
200
400
600
800
1000 NiO (ox)CuO (ox)
Mn3O4 (ox)
Tem
pera
ture
diff
eren
ce [K
]
wact [-]
Fe2O3 (ox)
2
2ξ
−∆∆ =
− ,,
,
( )R
p g Op s actin
act g O
HT C MC Mw w
10
Packed Bed CLC: Reduction
CH4
CO2/H2O
MeOMe
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CH4
Con
cent
ratio
n [-]
Axial position [m]
MeO
• Reduction cycle:Efficient use of fuelHigh CO2 capture efficiencySelectivity to CO2 and H2OIncomplete regeneration of part of the bed
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 6
11
Packed Bed CLC: Operation
• Operation over multiple cycles:
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Tem
pera
ture
at x
=L [K
]Time [s]
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0850
900
950
1000
1050
Tem
pera
ture
[K]
Axial position [m]
Fluidization between oxidation and reduction cycles is necessary to level off temperature profiles.
12
Modeling Packed Bed CLC
→ Cyclic steady state is obtained after only a few oxidation/reduction cycles.
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1000012000
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Tem
pera
ture
at x
=L [K
]
Time [s]
Reduction Oxidation
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 7
13
Experimental Validation
14
Experimental ValidationModel description Experimental results
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Tem
pera
ture
[K]
Axial position [m]0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Tem
pera
ture
[K]
Axial position [m]
Oxidation reaction:
(Cu/CuO, wact ≈ 0.1)➼199195∆Tmax [K]
0.13
1.53
Model
➼0.15w1 [cm/s]
➼1.58w2 [cm/s]
Exp.Improvements:• Correct implementation of heat losses in the model• Coupling of particle model and reactor model
(t = 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 s)
2nd Int'l Oxy-Combustion Workshop Page 8
15
Implementation
Reactor 1 Reactor 2
Rea
ctor
Exi
tTe
mpe
ratu
re [K
]
Time
• Implementation in power plant:Combined cycle to maximize overall energy efficiency
• Process design:Pressure dropNumber of reactorsReactor sizingHeat integration, etc.
• Important features:Compact designSuitable for part-load operation
16
Conclusions
• Packed bed (membrane-assisted) CLC is an interesting alternative power production technology:
• Process operation:Oxidation cycle: generation of high temperature air streamReduction cycle: combining efficient use of fuel and high CO2 capture efficiency
• Implementation in power plant:Combined cycle
• Future work:Experimental validation of packed bed CLCProcess design and efficiency calculations