PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR APICULTURE … · and by-products and their packaging...
Transcript of PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR APICULTURE … · and by-products and their packaging...
Project Review and Planning Workshop on Apiculture in Support to Organic Agriculture
1
9-11 December 2014 Clark, Pampanga
Department of Agriculture
BUREAU OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
FOR APICULTURE PRODUCTS
PROPONENT: Prof. Shirley O. Lopez
Dr. Florentina S. Dumlao
Jobelle O. Labatete
TARGET PROJECT COST: 3,552,700.00
TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT: 1,137,131.47
TOTAL AMOUNT RELEASED: 2,309,255.00
BALANCE: 1,172,123.53
DURATION NO. OF YEARS: 2 years with extension
DATE STARTED: October 2012
DATE ENDED: Ongoing
2
3
PROJECT OVERVIEW
General Objective:
Generally, the project aims to design and
develop packaging materials and labels
for apiculture products and by products
for foods such as honey, wine, vinegar
and non-food products such as soap,
dishwashing liquid, moisturizer and shoe
polish.
4
Specific Objectives:
1. Conduct an inventory of apiculture products
and by-products and their packaging
materials;
2. Determine best practices of apiculturist in
product packaging in compliance to
environmentally-friendly technologies;
3. Design the packaging material of apiculture
products and by products in the form of
biodegradable paper/boxes, recyclable
bottles, biodegradable plastic packing
materials;
4. Design the label of apiculture products and by
products;
5
5. Conduct the acceptability test of the different
designs and packaging materials and labels;
6. Produce packaging materials for the food and
non-food based apiculture products;
7. Provide a start-up packaging materials and
label for the project collaborators; and
8. Prepare policy recommendations on
packaging materials for apiculture food and
non food -based products in compliance to
Clean Air Act, Climate Change Act and Waste
Management Act and Eco-friendly
technologies.
Specific Objectives cont…
6
List of
Activities
Accomplished Proposed
Budget
Actual
Release
Difference
1. Conduct
product
inventory &
best
practices of
beekeepers
• Inventory of
apiculture
products
• Compilation of
best practices
100,000 100,000 0
2. Design
appropriate
packaging
materials &
labels for
apiculture
products
• Designed
packaging
materials and
labels for
apiculture
products
100,000 100,000 0
PHYSICAL and FINANCIAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
7
List of Activities Accomplished Proposed
Budget
Actual
Release
Difference
3. Produce packaging
materials & labels
for apiculture
products, and
purchase products
of collaborators
1,689,027 924,082 764,945
4. Launch & promote
new packaged
products
300,000 0 300,000
5. Tabulate, analyze
and interpret data
20,000 0 20,000
6. Prepare and submit
technical report
20,000 0 20,000
2,229,027 1,124,082 1,104,945
PHYSICAL and FINANCIAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS cont…
8
Project Components
and Activities per
Approved WP
Activities
Undertaken
Approved
Budget
Actual
Expenses
Variance
I. Product Inventory &
Best Practices
1. Determination of
locale &
respondents
2. Data gathering
a. Development of
instrument
b. Validation of
reliability test of
the data gathering
tool
c. Registration of
the instrument
d. Floating the
questionnaire
e. internet search &
ocular survey of
available
apiculture
products
100,000 66,407.50 33,592.50
HIGHLIGHTS OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS
9
Project Components
and Activities per
Approved WP
Activities
Undertaken
Approved
Budget
Actual
Expenses
Variance
II. Design &
Development of
Packaging materials
& labels
1. Preparation of designs
& packaging materials
& labels for apiculture
products
2. Conduct acceptability
test of the designs
a. Identification of locals
& respondents
b. Preparation of the
questionnaire
c. Floating the
questionnaires
3. MOA signing on
packaging material
development, label
designs & utilization by
identified cooperators
4. Cost analysis of the
product packages &
labels
5. Finalization of products
& cooperators as
recipients of the start-
up packaging materials.
1,789,027 50,000 1,739,027
HIGHLIGHTS OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS cont…
10
MFO, Components, Activities
Physical Target and
Accomp.
Financial Allocation
(M PhP)
Total
Targets
First
Year
Second
Year
Total
Budget
First
Year
Second
Year
MFO
Component 1: Product
Inventory & Best
Practices
Sub-activity 1: Conducted
inventory of apiculture products
& by-products
Sub-activity 2: Survey of
beekeepers practices
100
100
352
76
_
_
11
MFO, Components, Activities
Physical Target and Accomp. Financial Allocation
(M PhP)
Total
Targets
First
Year
Second
Year
Total
Budget
First
Year
Second
Year
MFO
Component 2: Designs &
Development of
Apiculture Products &
By-products
Sub-activity 1: Design labels for
apiculture products & by-products
Sub-activity 2: Conduct acceptability
test
Sub-activity 3: Identify product
cooperators
Sub-activity 4: MOA Signing of
Project implementers & cooperators
8 Designs
780
Households
8
Cooperators
8 MOAs
8
8
780
8
12
PROJECT MILESTONES
Project Milestone Brief Description
1. Conducted inventory apiculture
products
Local and imported apiculture
products were searched through
internet and ocular surveys in malls
and markets.
2. Identification of best practices Best practices of beekeepers during
production, harvesting and
processing of products were
identified through survey.
3. Prepared packaging and labeled
designs for apiculture products
Different designs of packaging
materials and labels for apiculture
products were drafted and subjected
to acceptability test by stakeholders
and consumer households.
4. Produced packaging materials
and labels for selected
cooperators
Packaging materials and labels were
produced for selected cooperators.
5. Purchased apiculture products
from selected cooperators
Produced apiculture products and
by-products with chosen packaging
materials and labels were bought
from the cooperators by the project.
13
COMMERCIALIZATION ACTIVITIES
• Production of packaging materials and
labels made of paper boxes that are
biodegradable and plastics that are
recyclable.
• Launching and promotion of the products to
increase awareness of prospective
costumers.
• Marketing of products to generate income.
14
PROJECT IMPACT (to include complete list of beneficiaries and highlights of success stories)
• Commercialization of apiculture products through the provision of start-up capital for identified cooperators.
• Promotion of the Beekeeping Industry in terms of the commercialized apiculture products.
• Increase of entrepreneurial activities to boost our country’s economy.
15
PROJECT COOPERATORS NAME OF
PRODUCT
COOPERATOR CONTACT PERSON ADDRESS
1. Honey DINGAYAN’S APIARY Mr. Domingo L. Dingayan
Proprietor
San Francisco Norte,
Sudipen, La Union
2. Honey Vinegar DMMMSU-NARTDI Dr. Jaime C. Dangle
Director
Sapilang, Bacnotan, La
Union
3. Honey Wine DIELLE’S APIARY
AND MEADERY
ENTERPRISES
Mr. Luke Macababad
Proprietor
Tunasan, Muntinlupa City
4. Honey and
Propolis Soap
LA UNION
HONEYBEE
CENTER
Ms. Imelda J. Sannadan
Provincial Agriculturist
Raois, Bacnotan, La Union
5. Honey Citrus
Soap
NUEVA VIZCAYA
STATE UNIVERSITY
Dr. Florentina S. Dumlao
President
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
6. Dishwashing
Liquid with
Propolis
DMMMSU-NARTDI Dr. Jaime C. Dangle
Director
Sapilang, Bacnotan, La
Union
7. Moisturizing
Cream
CENTRAL BICOL
STATE UNIVERSITY
OF AGFICULTURE
Dr. Georgina J. Bordado
President
Pili, Camarines Norte
8. Pro Polish CAGAYAN STATE
UNIVERSITY
Dr. Romeo R. Quilang
President
Sanchez Mira, Cagayan
16
PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY
Each cooperator agreed to produce
1000 pieces/bottles of apiculture products to
be purchased by the project. The sale from
these products will be utilized by them for
added operational expenses to sustain their
beekeeping venture.
17
ISSUES/CONCERNS/CHALLENGES & ACTIONS TAKEN
Issues / Concerns/ Challenges Action Undertaken
1. Inadequate listing of
beekeepers
• Partial master listing of
beekeepers
2. Difficulty in the acquisition of
NSCB Clearance for the
gathering tool
• Complied to the required
documents
3. Personnel fast turnover • Complied to the directives from
authorities
4. Increase requirements for the
procurement of supplies and
other items
• Included items to be procured in
the Supplemental Procurement
Plan
5. Lack of raw materials • Sourcing out throughout the
country
6. Difficulty in looking for
manufacturer of tin cans in the
country
• Shifted to plastic containers
7. Cost of production for 1,000
copies is more expensive
• Ordered 2,000 copies at lower
cost
18
PHOTOS
19
PROJECT SIGNAGE
20
SAMPLE
DESIGNS FOR
LABELS AND
PACKAGING
MATERIALS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Action shots
• INTERVIEW OF BEEKEEPERS
29
• ACCEPTABILITY OF PACKAGING
MATERIALS & LABELS
30
• PROJECT
MONITORING
BY DA-BAR
31
32
• PROJECT COOPERATOR – DINGAYAN’S APIARY MR. & MRS. DOMINGO DINGAYAN, PROPRIETORS
33
• PROJECT
COOPERATOR
FOR HONEY &
PROPOLIS SOAP,
LA UNION
HONEYBEE
CENTER
34
• PROJECT
COOPERATOR
FOR HONEY
CITRUS SOAP,
NVSU
35
• PROJECT COOPERATOR FOR HONEY VINEGAR
AND DISHWASHING LIQUID W/ PROPOLIS,
DMMMSU-NARTDI, DR. JAIME C. DANGLE, DIRECTOR
36
PROJECT PROMOTION THROUGH MEDIA , ATING ALAMIN TV PROGRAM C/O KA-GERRY GERONIMO
37
38
SAMPLES OF PACKAGED PRODUCTS EXHIBITED DURING THE NVSU FOUNDATION
39
SAMPLES…
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING
40