'PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Steam Electric …Teledyne Engineering services Final Report...
Transcript of 'PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Steam Electric …Teledyne Engineering services Final Report...
PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
UNIT 1
REVIEW OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION
ON A SAMPLE OF 400 PIPE SUPPORTS
AND ALL PHASE III (LARGE PIPE)
ANCHORS
82i2ih04i9 82i207PDR ADOCK 05000387P PDR
0
r,r
1
PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
UNIT 1
REVIEW OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION
ON A SAMPLE OF 400 PIPE SUPPORTS
AND ALL PHASE III (LARGE PIPE)
ANCHORS
PREPARED BY. ...- P~Cd&~'ale
Sattar Date
REVIEWED BY:Walte J. Rhoades
-3'o-d"ZDate
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~Pa e
LIST OF REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM PROCEDURE .
PERSONNEL AND THEIR QUALIFICATIONS
TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED
SUMMARY
CONCLUSIONS
10
12
13
16
AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAMREVIEW OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDUREMANUAL
RECORDS AND QUALIFICATIONS OFMEMBERS OF GROUP 2
RECORDS OF TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
SAMPLE PACKAGES OF ABR REVIEW
LIST OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATIONOF SUPPORTS REVIEWED
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
REFERENCES
1. Teledyne Engineering services Final Report TR-5599-3 "IndependentDesign Review — Susquehanna Steam Electric Station," dated August 23,1982.
2. PP&L report on the ABR review of the Twenty (20) supports entitled"Report on Sampling of piping support As-built ReconciliationJudgement Verification" dated October 7, 1982.
INTRODUCTION
Pennsylvania Power and I.ight Company (PPBL) selected a portion of the
Feedwater system to have independent design review performed on it as part of
NCR requirements. Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) was selected to
perform the independent design review. TES issued their final report on
August 23, 1982 (see Reference 1).
A finding of the TES Independent Design Review, Reference (1), addressed the
reconciliation process between as-built and as-designed pipe supports. It is
a requirement that the differences between the as-built and as-designed must
be reconciled (see IE Bulletin 79-14). The as-built reconciliation (ABR) of
the Feedwater System reviewed by TES indicated, that it was not as thorough
and as complete as it should have been. On few supports additional
calculations had to be performed to )ustify the acceptability of them. In
one case, the weld at the shield wall was found to be acceptable after
reducing the conservatism in the original analysis and performing a detailed
computer solution of the support. In some cases statements were made that
the differences (between as-built and as-designed) are considered
acceptable. There was no traceability as to what differences were judged to
be acceptable and whether, in fact, all of them were considered. As a
result, TES stated that although't was demonstrated that the supports for
the Feedwater System were acceptable for all imposed loadings, conclusions
with respect to the total plant support reconciliation process- could not be
reached.
INTRODUCTION Cont'd.
In a meeting with NRC and TES on September 9, 1982, PP&L committed to review
the as-built reconciliation of twenty (20) additional supports on systems
other than the feedwater. The supports were selected from the Core Spray,
Residual Heat Removal, Reactor Water Clean-up, and High Pressure Coolant
Injection systems. There were 3 anchors, 6 struts, 2 guides, 5 snubbers and
4 springs. This review was completed and a report was issued dated October
7, 1982 (see Reference 2). The review indicated that on one anchor support
the as-built welding was done on one side instead of all around on a
transverse I beam sitting on two horizontal I beams. This anchor required
extensive reanalysis in an attempt to 5ustify it acceptable. As a result
PP&L elected to fix the anchor by re-welding the beam on three (3) sides
(fourth side is inaccessible but calculations performed indicate that theI
anchor is qualified).
PP&L then decided to follow through 'with an increase in sample size. This
was decided upon in order to get a handle on the as-built reconciliation
program, adequacy, reliability and safety of the piping support on Unit 1 of
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES). After some discussion and thought
on the size of the sample, it was decided to review the ABR and perform
additional calculations and analyses where required to justify the
acceptability of the as-built conditions and perform rework where they are
required.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The number of supports decided upon for the As-built Reconciliation (ABR)
review are about 400. The final exact number turned out to be four hundred
and one (401). The breakdown of the supports with respect to systems are as
follows:
RHR 198
RCIC 75
CS 56
HPCI 45
RWCU 19
RBCCW
CAC
Total 401
The breakdown of supports with respect to type are as follows:
Struts
Guides
Snubbers
Anchors
Springs
208
100
44
34
15
Total 401
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Cont'd.
The percentage of the supports in this effort with respect to total
population in Unit 1 and common are as follows:
Su ort T e Po ulation ~Sem le
Struts
Guides
Snubbers
Springs
Anchors
921 27%
839 25%
899 27%
518 16%
163 5%
52%
25%
11%
4%
8%
Total 3340 100% 100%
Please note that the sample is more heavily skewed toward struts, guides, and
anchors. The reason is because these supports are relatively more
complicated and involved with respect to utilization of various structural
and pipe support members and also the utilization of welding to join them
together than other type of supports. In addition to being the more
complicated type of supports, they are also the more critical type of support
with respect to load carrying ability. These type of supports, therefore,
are more important as far as the ABR process and review of them isconcerned.'ES
was kept abreast of our scope of work, program, procedure and progress.
A TES observer (from Waltham, Massachusetts) was sent to Bechtel San
Francisco Home Office where PP8L .was conducting the ABR review. The TES
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Cont'd.
Observer from Waltham, Mass. was then replaced with one from their Hayward,
California office. TES observation of the process and review of the
procedure did include spot checking of supports to determine if TES agreed
with the Categorization (see program procedure). Additionally copies of the
"As-built Reconciliation Program review objectives and Procedure Manual" (see
Appendix A) and ABR packages, with Category III (see program procedure)
items, requiring additional calculations were sent to TES for their review
and/or concurrence.
In a meeting with NRC, Teledyne, an'd Bechtel, PPAL committed to perform the
ABR review of all Phase III anchors. Phase III anchors are'.defined as those
in the Containment, Reactor Building, and Control Structure in Seismic
Category I systems and subject to hydrodynamic loads. Anchors which are part
of Containment (flued heads) and anchors at equipment such as pumps, vessels,
etc. are specifically excluded from this effort. The anchors considered for
review are, essentially, the intermediate anchors which use'"structural steel
and piping support components to provide restraint. An anchor is defined as
a pipe support which provides translational restraint and rotationalli'
restraint in at. least one direction. It was decided that the anchors inside
of the Containment shall have a higher priority to those outside of the
Containment.
The ABR review of the anchors was performed in the same fashion as the 401
scope. The supports which do not meet the original design requirements or
design intent (see Criteria for fix in the Procedure Manual in Appendix A)
shall be reworked or modified as necessary.
Please note that this whole effort of review of ABR on selected supports were
completely under control and management of PP&L.
PROGRAM PROCEDURE
The procedure by which the ABR review was accomplished "As-built
Reconciliation Program Review Objectives and Procedures Manual" is included
in Appendix A. There were essentially three (3) distinct groups of people
(by function) involved in the ABR review effort. The responsibility and
function of each group are described, in detail, in the Procedure Manual (see
Appendix A). A very brief summary of the activities and responsibilities of
each group are as follows:
Group 1 — Identified all items that are the same on both Engineering
Drawing and as-built drawing by crossing them out with yellow
pencil. Items not identical are circled in red. Items not
identified on either of the drawings are circled in green with
an asterisk mark.
Group 2 — Did the categorization of the differences between engineering
and as-built drawings in accordance with the following
definitions:
CATEGORY I: Are those differences which are considered
insignificant, such as slight variation in
dimensions.
CATEGORY II: Are those differences which may be of concern
but upon further investigation are considered
PROGRAM PROCEDURE Cont'd.
acceptable. The investigation, however, may be
by engineering judgement or by simply referring
to the as-designed calculation and noting what
the requirements or actual stresses are.
CATEGORY III: Are those differences which are of concern and
require further evaluation. The evaluation
would require an additional analysis or a more
detailed analysis of the original calculation.
If the categorizations were such that all differences were
acceptable, then the review of the particular support is
considered complete. If, however, there were Categorization
III(s) with the need for additional calculations, then itwould be the responsibility of the Group 3 to provide the
additional calculations. These calculations then must be
reviewed and concurred by a member of Group 2 and PP8L's Team
Leader before the support is considered acceptable. Even
where rework is considered necessary on a support, the
calculations and adequacy of the rework was reviewed and
concurred with in the same fashion by Group 2.
PROGRAM PROCEDURE Cont'd.
Group 3 — Was responsible to provide additional calculations as
necessary and type of rework as applicable. The calculations
were to be performed in accordance with original design
standards and procedures.
Two sample packages of ABR review showing Group 1 and Group 2 work are shown
in Appendix D.
It is important to note that the members of Group 2 had total freedom and
made decisions independently regarding categorization of differences and
concurrence with methodology and calculations.
PERSONNEL AND THEIR QUALIFICATIONS
The members of Group 1 are Bechtel's employee. This activity was essentially
performed in accordance with Procedure Manual (see Appendix A) by Bechtel at
the request of PP&L.
The members of Group 2 are PP&L's, Bechtel's and Quadrex's employees. There
were, at the height of the effort, 6 teams in Group 2. Each team, regardless
of its make-up, had a PP&L team leader to assign work and review theI
results. The members of Group 2 were well qualified for the task. The
minimum requirements for the qualification were BS degree in engineering
preferably with a PE license and minimum of three (3) years preferably five
(5) years of experience in piping support analysis. The names and
qualifications of the members of Group 2 are shown in Appendix B.
It is important to note that the Group 2 people had complete freedom and
independence to reach a decision on their own regarding the categorization of
the differences and adequacy of the supports where additional calculations
were provided for their review and concurrence.
The members of Group 3 are Bechtel's employees. The Group 3 activity was
technically and administratively under Bechtel's control and management. The
Group 3 people work normally on Susquehanna's project in the piping support
section. The calculations and analyses, however, provided by Group 3 in
response to Category III differences were reviewed and concurred with by
members of Group 2 as explained previously. The names and qualifications of
the personnel of Group 3 are shown in Appendix B.
10—
TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
The personnel of Group 1 were given training and a copy of the Procedure
Manual to everyone. The information given to them verbally and through the
Procedure Manual described in detail their task and what was expected of
them.
Likewise the personnel of Group 2 were given training and a copy of the
Procedure Manual to everyone. Also the information given to them verbally
and through the Procedure manual described in detail their task and what they
were to do.
The records of training of personnel are shown in Appendix C for both Group 1
and Group 2.
AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED
The list of the 401 Supports and Phase III anchors (Inside and Outside of the
Containment) reviewed are shown in Appendix E.
-12-
SUMMARY
The review of the As-built reconciliation (ABR) of the 401 supports had a
total of 89 supports with Category III and 312 supports with Categories I and
II only.
We found the review of the ABR on 312 out of the 401 supports acceptable.
The balance of 89 had Category III differences which required Group 3
(Bechtel) to provide additional ABR calculations. As it turned out, 25 of
the 89 supports did not require additional calculations. That is, they
either required additional clarifications or the ABR calculations already
existed. (This should be attributed to the conservative nature of members of
Group 2. That is, if there was any question or doubt on the acceptability of
a judgement or concern about the ABR of a support, they tended to designate
it as Category III and require additional justification). Therefore 337 out
of the 401 supports were found acceptable and 64 had Category III of the type
that required additional ABR calculations.
The 64 supports has a further breakdown as follows:
o 41 supports required additional calculations which can be considered
as simple in nature.
— 13—
SUMMARY Cont'd.
o 8 supports required additional calculations which were provided by
computer printout, but the difference between the as-designed and
as-built were not that extensive.
o 15 supports required additional calculations which were considered as
complex analysis because there were substantial changes in the
as-built condition requiring extensive ABR analysis.
Total of two (2) supports out of the 401 required rework (see the Procedure
Manual in Appendix A for Criteria for fix). One is an anchor (DBB-121-H7)
which required additional welding. The other is a strut (GBB-109-H31) which
required additional bracing and stiffening the structural beam supporting it.
ANCHORS
There are a total of 163 phase III anchors on which we performed the ABR
review. There are 16 anchors inside and 147 anchors outside of the
Containment. It is important to note that a total of 34 of these anchors (3
inside and 31 outside of the containment) are part of the 401 scope. For
simplicity and clarity of the statistic presentation they are not recounted
as part of the anchors. Therefore, there are a total of 129 phase IIIanchors (new scope) on which we performed the ABR review.
— 14—
ANCHORS INSIDE OF CONTAINMENT
There are 13 anchors inside and 116 anchors outside of the containment as
part of the new scope. The review of ABR on 8 out of the 13 (inside of
containment) was found acceptable. The balance of 5 had Category IIIdifferences which required additional ABR calculations.
Three anchors required rework. These are DCB-102-H2, HBD-1053-H25, and
HBD-1054-H40. All three required additional welding. Please note that
DCB-102-H2 is the anchor which was identified to require rework previously as
part of the ABR review of the original 20 sample (See Reference 2).
We found the review of the ABR on 55 of the 116 (outside of containment)
acceptable. The balance of 61 had Category III differences which required
additional ABR calculations. Again, it turned out that 7 supports did not
require additional ABR calculations but merely clarification of existing ABR
calculations. Therefore, the net result is, that 62 out of 116 anchors were
acceptable. However, 54 anchors had Category III differences and required
additional calculations.
Seven anchors required rework. Three anchors (JRD-129-H1, JBD-119-H57, and
JBD-114-H50) required additional welding. Two anchors (HBB-ill-H2 and
DBC-102-Hl) required additional stiffeners as well as welding. One anchor
had undersize struts (pair of size 6 instead of size 7). The last one had a
base plate which was common for two (2) anchors. The base plate is cut in
half to justify the analysis (to act as separate anchors).
— 15—
CONCLUSIONS
We found that Bechtel's original as-built reconciliation program, procedure
and documentations were weak. It became clear that Bechtel did not perform
the as-built reconciliation nearly as complete and as thorough as it should
have been. We were pleased to see, however, that the number of supports
considered marginally exceeding design limits were not widespread or even
significant. Of the 401 sample supports on which we performed ABR review,
only one support required additional welding. This is not to say that the
support is inadequate. To establish adequacy or inadequacy of a support is
beyond our scope of work and mission. By adequacy we mean whether the
support served its intended purpose or failed to do so. We may point out
that the loads used and the methodology applied in designing and analyzing
pipe supports are often very conservative. Additionally there is the margin
between the allowable stresses and those at which failure would result. That
is why the failure of a pipe support is highly unlikely unless there is gross
negligence in design and/or construction of it. We reviewed the ABR to see
if the differences between the as-built and as-designed are addressed within
the limits of design criteria and codes. The one support which was
designated to require additional welding was done so because otherwise the
limits of design criteria and codes would have been exceeded. Please note
that the support in Question is an anchor and as stated previously all Phase
III anchors were reviewed for their ABR. The other support required rework
because it was not designed properly.
-16-
CONCLUSION Cont'd.
C
\
We think the ABR review of all phase III anchors was a worthwhile effort. We
think so because of the weakness in the original ABR and more importantly
because of the importance of anchors. In effect the as-built reconciliation
is re-performed because all differences are documented and reconciled through
existing calculations and/or new ones performed where required. We are also
pleased that those anchors which required rework in order to maintain the
original design safety margin and conservatism are identified.
— 17—
APPENDIX A
AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM
REVIEW OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURE
MANUAL
Revision 0 10/9/82
Revision 1 10/9/82 8 0"
Revision 2 10/12/82
Revision 3 10/14/82~ pg
Revision 4 11/19/82~a
AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM REVIEW
OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
PENNSYLVANIA KMER & LIGHT COMPANY
R.
WP23/1-1
W.. Rhoades — P. P. & L.
TABLE OF CCNZENT
PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITIONS
ORGANIZATION
DOCUMENTATION RETRIEVAL
GROUP 1
GROtJP 2
GROUP 3
FINAL DOCUMENTATION 10
LIST OF ATI'ACHMENZS
ADDENDA 1
ANCHORS 17
ADDENDA 2
CRITERIA FOR FIX 18
WP23/1-la
Page 2
INTRODUCTION
It has been concluded by PP&L that additional review of the As-Built
Reconciliation Prcgram is necessary. The purpose of this review is
to provide a very high confidence level to PP&L and the NRC that
there exist no unsafe piping supports in the Susquehanna Steam
Electric Station.
Accordingly, PP&L has selected a sample size of five hundred (500)
seismic category one supports to be reviewed. This sample size
provides us with the high degree of confidence we require. However;
after we have reviewed several hundred supports, this sample size
may be adjusted upwards or downwards depending on the results of
the survey at that time.
Selection of the supports to be reviewed will be made by PP&L
representatives. It is intended that the sample selected be random
with respect to systems but skewed in favor of anchors, rigid and
operationally active snubbers with less consideration towards dead
weight type supports. A complete list of those supports selected
will be documented in the final report.
m 23/1-2
Page 3
DEFINITIONS
The following are the definitions of the categories of differences
between the as-built and engineering drawirgs.
CATEGORY I: Are those differences which are considered insignifi-
cant, such as slight variation in dimensions.
CATEGORY II: Are those differences which may be of concern but upon
further investigation are considered acceptable. The
investigation, however, may be by engineering judgement
or by simply referring to the as-designed calculation
and noting what the requi ements or actual stresses
are.
CATEGORY III: Are those differences which are of concern and require
further evaluation. 'Ihe evaluation would require an
additional analysis or a more detailed analysis of the
o iginal calculation.
REJECT: Reject is defined by PP&L as any support that, in the
judgement of PP&L, requires a field hardware modification.
WP23/1-3
Page 4
ORGANIZATION
This program is organized into three primary task groups plus a
documentation retrieval group. Task group one will perform the
function of ccmparing and clearly identifying .all differences between
the final "as-built" and the engineering analyzed support drawing.
Group two will perform the judgements and determine to which category
each item, highlighted by Group one, is to be put and docunent that
category. Group three will take those Category IIIwhich require
resolution and perform the necessary calculations or additional
research work to verify acceptability of the support. If field
walkdown for review of specific support is required it will be made
and documented by the PP&L Resident Engineering.
DOCUMENTATION RETRIEVAL
STEPS
1. Check Pipe Support list against DOCRET to note the latest
Ergineering revision. (DOCRET is the log of engineering revi-
sions issued and is generated from microfilm cards and was in
existence at the time of as-built reconciliation.)
WP23/1-4
Page 5
2. Copy of Engineering revision
a. Retrieve copy
b. Make 1 copy
c. To be filed in binder later
3. Copy of the latest as-built frcm the ABR (As-Built Reconciliation)
binder
a. Check revision xn bander reconczliatxon sheet
b. Locate as-built P.S. detail in the ABR. Check to ensure that
the sticker is signed-off by Engineerirg.
c. Put marker in the ABR binder
-d. Sign-out out card
e. Make 1 copy
f. File back where marker was
g. Sign-out ABR out-card.
Can rison of E ineerir and As-Built Pi Su rt Details
( Yellow-out Process):
l. 'btain copy of Engineering and as-built P.S. revision
2. Yellow-out all items that are identical on both Engineering and
as-built pipe support detail.
3. Items not identical to the Engineering revision should be circled
in red.
WP 23/1-5
Page 6
4. Identify items that are not identified on either of the drawings
by a circle in green with an asterisk mark.
It is to be emphasized that no judgements are to be made by Group one
personnel and that all differences, no matter how trivial they may
appear, are to be marked in red or green. The following example is
an illustration of this regui ement:
E ineeri Drawi "As Built"
This item is to be marked in red on As-Built drawing
Bill of Materials
"As-Built"
4W13 x 6'-2" 4W13 x 6'-1"
This item is to be marked in red
5. Fill out the cover sheet ccmpletely
6. Package cover sheet, Engineering revision and yellowed-out
as-built P.S. detail.
7. All packages returned to group one task coordinator for PP&L
review.
WP 23/1-6
Page 7
GROUP 2
Rev'iew and Dis sition of Differences Between E ineeri and As-Built
Drawirrs
l. Ensure that Group One Cover Sheet has been properly signed off
p.ior to performing any reviews.
2. Record each difference on the prescribed sheet (attached) .
3. Categorize each difference as Category I, II, III as described
in Definitions Section.
4. Resolutions:
Category I differences are those that are insignificant such as
slight va. iation in dimensions and thus, are acceptable by
def inition.
Category II differences are those that are acceptable by engineering
judgement or reference to original calculations. Por example,
the design called for a 6" diameter pipe having a wall thickness of 3/8".Jl
The as-built shows a 6" x 6" x 1/4" thick square structural tube
is used instead. This may be acceptable by engineering judgement
by comparing the area and se"tion modules of them in relation to the
imposed load. Another example is the design has called for a
3/8" fillet weld all around a member. The as-built shows 5/16"
fillet weld is used instead. By referring to the original calculation,
it is noted that a 1/4" fillet weld is required and thus is
acceptable.
WP 23/1-7
Page 8
(Note: The original calculations are QA docvnents and, as such,
are considered valid and acceptable design basis calculations.
'Iherefore, there would be no need to re-review the original
calculations and would be beyond the scope of this task) .
Category IIIdifferences are those that require additional
calculations to resolve the difference between the as-designed
and as-built. You should search the As-Built Reconciliation
(ABR) book to see if there exist calculations that address eachh
Category IIIdifference. When there are no ABR calculations for
an item or the calculations are not satisfactory, you should
identify that additional calculations are required prior to
acceptance or sign off. Please print your name and your team
leader's name on the first sheet for identification purposes
prior to submitting them to your team leader. When additional
calculations are required, the necessary calculations will be
performed by Group III and provided to you. If additional cal-
culations are needed to resolve the difference(s), no matter how
simple a calculation, you are requested not to make them yourself.
'Ihis is because of two (2) reasons. First, the calculations
need to be verified in accordance with established procedures
and be documented. Second, the Group III fun"tion is to make
these calculations and they are available to do so. After yout
WP23/1-8
Page 9
are provided with the calculations the package will be considered
ccmplete if you concur with the calculations and all Category
IIIdifferehces have been addressed. If not, a resolution for
them will be reguired. If there is an impass, PPSL shall determine
the final resolution for them. If rejects are identified (see
definition) because hardware changes are required they would be
identified and signed off. Needless to say, if there are
no Category IIIdifferences, the "As-Built Reconciliation Judgement
Verification" form shall be signed off based on acceptance of
Category I and II differences, if any.
5. Items that need Field verification or clarification due to
drawing ambiguity, clarity should be identified and brought
to %barn leader's attention for resolution.
6. Forward package to PP&L representative for review and concurrence.
P'ROUP
3
Performance of Additional Calculations to Justif Ade ac of the
Differences Desi nated as Cat o III b'rou II
1. Generate calculations per PEEN as necessary to validate the
differences and the as-built condition to the extent feasible.
All packages forwarded to Group 3 require individualized disposition
WP 23/1-9
Page 10
to assure support adeguacy. The disposition of all Category IIIitems shall be docunented on the As-Built Reconciliation Program
Review —Category III Response form. Once you receive a package
identify what must be done and proceed.
If a calculation needs to be run, proceed imnediately and, once
appropriate calculations are canplete, attach them to the ccmpleted
package, sign the cover sheet and forward them to PP&L. If field
checking of an item is required, notify PP&L and they will make
arrangements for PP&L Resident Engineering group to make necessary
checks. If any support cannot be resolved by additional calculations,
notify PP&L imnediately.
FINAL DOCUMENTATION:
l. A sample selection of the Final Docunentation Package will be
made by PP&L to assure the following:
a. As-Built Reconciliation Judgement Verification sheet ccmletely
filled in.
b. Gopies of yellow-out cover sheets filled in.
c. Copies of Engineering revision and as-built P.S. detail
(yellow-out copy)
NP23/1-10
Page ll
d. Calculations as applicable, and when generated by Group 3
for each pipe support.
e. Completed Response form for all Category IIIdispositions.
LIST OF ATTACHMENI'S:
1. Sample signoff sheet for Group 1, "As-built reconciliation
Program Review" (See page 12).
2. Sample sheet for Group 2, "As-Built Reconciliation Judgement
Verification" (See pages 13-15) .
3. Sample sheet for Group 3, "As-built Reconciliation Program
Review —Category III Response Form" (See sheet 16).
WP23/l-ll
ASWUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM REVIEW
HGRs NOo Page 12
COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING AND AS"BUILT PIPE SUPPORT DETAILYELLOW OUT PROCESS)
PERFORtKD BYlPRINT NAME S IGNATURE
ORGANIZATION
PERFORIKD'ES
SIGNATURE PP 6
REVIEWEP BYl(IF YES) PRINT NAME S IGNATURE
DATE ORGAN IZATION
AS BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION
Page l3
SUPPORT TYPE
SUPPORT DHGe NO<
ISO DWGs NOe
ENG G DWG, REVi
AS BUILT REV,
SYSTEM
SHEET 1 OF
PERFORMED BYl SIGN
REVIEWED BYl SIGN
FCI
DIFFERENCES RESOLUTION
CATEGORY I DIFFERENCESARE DEPEND ACCEPTABLEBY DEFINITIONS
~ ~
Page 14
AS BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION
SUPPORT DWGe NOe SHEET OF
DIFFERENCES
CATEGORY IIRESOLUTION
~ ~I
~ ~
CATEGORY III
I
tI y
i~
Page 15
AS"BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION
SUPPORT DHGe KOe
CATEGORY
DIFFERENCES RESOLUTION
~ ~
kL ~ '
v1
'"'p
A $ g lc~ 4,a.rV
Q i
f
r-~
'0-- ' ~
j ~ ISa" .4l'
1 fF
l
A
page 17
ANCHORS
In a meeting with NRC on October 22, 1982, PAL conmitted to re-
perform the as-built reconciliation (ABR} on all Phase III*large
pipe anchors. &is shall be accomplished in accordance with this
procedure.
Additionally it was agreed that the nunber of the selected sample
size shall remain as four hundred and one (401} which is the number of
supports on which status was available (prior to meeting with NRC}.
*Phase IIIanchors are those in the containment, &actor Bldg & ControlStructure in Seismic Cat. I systems and subject to hydrodynamic loads.
WP23/1-8
Page 18
ADDENDA 2
CRITERIA FORANCHORS (AND SUPPORTS*) TO BEFIXED IN THE FIELD (UNIT gl)
An anchor (or support *) in Unit 1 will be fixed if:a. It has been classified as Category IIIby the
re-reconciliation teams, and
b. It requires the performance of some calculation(simple or complex) at this time in order todemonstrate that the hanger is adequate, and
c. Jhe difference between the as-built conditionand the engineering design has resulted insi nificant reduction in the design margin ofthe hanger as gudged y PAL team leader** forthe hanger re-reconciliation program.
* Suggorts other than anchors identified in Cat III in 401 sample.
** Dale Sattar
WP23/1-16
APPENDIX B
RECORDS AND QUALIFICATIONS OF
MEMBERS OF GROUP 2
TEAM LEADER'S NAME: RRTTHp~ HO S eR 0 R.
(PP&L')
TEAM MEMBERS
NAME (Print)
Y<c ko'olte
ORGANIZATION
QUA
Go+ha (=<
&c.A/e/
DEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
8.5- (4t19
Ss l~~<
Ns i~85C'E /g7D
Se.hh Sg
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
T~. Qoiv. a Scr4k1
Qg ~ u C A5]Q ol-'vz~AXbi
QAuCdti o JjNAk ua lag- Tech,Oker
PFPT> gM)g ging
YRS. OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE
~ QC(V(
SI(ÃATURE
WP23/5(
:0TEAM 4
R S NAME.. ~AR~ R'. HJAr47VES T(PP&L's)
TEAM MEMBERS
NAME (Print)DEGREE
ORGANIZATION & YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRSo OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE
SIGNATURE
G i~szRT Artcc. '+PAL 7p c~Unlidd'+rr,'o~4cw'i~a~/ <
gozis Zw@'r~gyrg Zwvrw
/AS ~rahu< K
gPAZA'FX 4$ +F Xr
6rrrvERsl p pF ZFwur" gp /0
VicT~~ &as~z~+W~~ /AC/ITAL 9G: rrrCF. 4&/+6'~rrVuF V/EV
M~l&lW~~rc< P)cc.e g M-f lv CC6
(r(c))~ (oTp~) QC>ye<
WP23/5
mw sgmw mmR's mwE: ~oh» d, Sck~«c.L|'r
(PP&L')
a -rf-8'<TEAM MEMBERS
NAME (Print) ORGANIZATIONDEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &
PIPE SUPPORT
PELICENSE
STATESIGNATURE
73/r~~'r/O r/
d)IA7OS II
chen A
P. KUVOIJ
A7'~ <
C//IAo-A( p//AAJQ
D u.- R
AO~1-DPv'x
8uMrexQUHDMYg CccI rr-=
r'f'C//7W
C
QFCff}EC
wer868'S
g-g. r-rory/ts9
RC.E Iai
I~aC Ht uraI~:.r5tC~I2AvJC~l ) IMBJA/Awe: WPlP4 /dV~A) ~7~ DN/l/.gR.Z~OrrS'i c~Z Ui'/uJD(A
i(gdiv'c'Rs> cf ofQ IQ crQpQMI
Oa}>vERsi~~ oFSour ERA CAGE c~P r
C
bv DB)D
Q/264'R
pic'Q..c '"'g ~
WP23/5
(.
TEAM a
TEIM IZAD6R'S NINE: QFUCC W +~+ 'I/O. I(PP&L')
/y -//-2TEAN MEMBERS
NAME (Print) ORGANIZATIONDEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &
PIPE SUPPORT
PELICENSE
STATESIGNATURE
SAR.E.% W. a p
7h'o+8~ k, c+7A0 US SCILv+lYD/
Qgn 4c
PE, ZN.SpE zing
7/E 2lgw
W<srrzucru A)
8s pclviL) lgdo
vxAR, T VIVWh40
UI4 O~ 4 ~
coar&EZ ~llrcI/n&onfe'sing.
g/g IR,
9+c+A~ g./ @45+~ dsc/A
2bSCefCrt@, 1 fc I - ///IQ/gir&c'a/.
WP23/5,
(
0TEAM» QTEAM LEADER'S NAME: QILg<El Q goSE,
(PP&L')
TEAM MEMBERS
NAME (Print)DEGREF.
ORGANIZATION & YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE
SIGNATURE
HI~4el Il Rose
I/IIIH IS. lJCgU BtJ
APUS t'd/Y&, d6NK iA ug~A
K84C Low I-lA
p pgL Ns. ling)
@V~ke g wS
40APRHXPv! 4 /97%M8 17
QUADR'S i)80
'U A iu6 ~ t 0~ (PCAvl~SaE.C
(Ver~ F ~L. g~J~~< e o.
SAQ ~OSP ST@ C
7f ~LitClairCA-Ll
mes 2PTEAM LEADER'S NAME: /Park P. b~f'aakYW~
(PP&L's)
NAME (Print)
C(AJO ~Ma~c~A P 5ud
Ebns Levlk
gasa Levid
doe Vo|'en ce
ORGANIZATION
QOGc3l < x
gWr~g&abbrev
guerre.x
DEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENC E
IN PIPING &
PIPE SUPPORT
PELICENSE
STATESI(ÃATURE
Al07p: gc) p cpu'84/'r <r>~i'e</ D~ WD l~ p +@+4'~ g++ +~X/ot w 4c/Fc p
NP23/5
(.
TEAM I Q g. Tnw rzaoeR's mE:g»»» g yg»g»cc~h —Pg
(PP&L')
TEAM MBCBERS
NAME (Print)
WOSALU
C c.<4
Clghsbgu; KA-cd~(
ORGANIZATIONDEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE
SIGNATURE
A4P/: ~Z Pu>gr+rP:)re,i OH HSPV4 gXDPZ< >EX PMdrO>3 SWi~~&
WP23/5
(PP&L')
/%
NAME (Print)
ft'lQVYl45 Qo~g ~
gray h'ea~f4l <ToE, Huaca
ORGANIZATIONDEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
8773
$$(4s9>4
5 c.E.S9'? 6M5HE
NAME OFUNIVERSITY.
/san Xj7jP C~i'~.A@pj's'~(+~ fLC TC KN>t.
'Pm~ <~4«(oral
Sel@tAH fo&JQ lAd4.
YRSi OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &
PIPE SUPPORT
PELICENSE
STATE
~% Pg
SIGNATURE
,7.'P23IP
.(PP&L')
TEAM MEMBERS
NAME (Print)
(
A(Vs'RGANIZATIONDEGREE
& YEAR OFGRADUATION
NAME OFUNIVERSITY
YRS. OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &
PIPE SUPPORT
PELICENSE
STATESIGNATURE
54a
90+5-'d8 gPPg/w/c"Ay r4/ .pp" ggpyx ~rg~g~ ~~+ ~g~+~p~~ ~~y~~~
WP23/5
APPENDIX C
RECORDS OF TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
MEIVIORANDUM
SUBJECT + o
I 6 TC i'�(<) nd tet n Epl~(~ JOB ~O 5dS SBS
g ~gf (7 fCG~conCi/IA Pi~~ evHM
-2(
2
MEMORANDUM
TO LOCATION
FROM DATE
SUBJECT JOB NO
FILE
0043 (6 75)
MEMORANDUM
7 ihip '
n cert CF B A /UcB i 2 LOCATION
OATE
BUBJEcT lg,AgA/ AJ QWSIortc'8i'Sonne
i lwvolvo/ n 8 evieco
JOB NO
FILE
H . SCeeatC KVC .
Cgoing
7ec ~n
e-
214'-
BcA&coP4C/P+ C c P&@~&8rgg
j3AlA
/A FF CcCP ere L
20 -o s BeJPZC Ic'..
&ha- 7Pc
Z- CA'Svp.o
V043 (6 75)
&3 8Ec<5i +IJ k.
MEMORANDUM
o SeSSro rJLOCATION
FROM DATE ID
SUBJECT JOS NO
a<c
CQ 6 l9 c) R
g048X
5VLU IP 3 5HavJ
D 08 i'd'
Pe-1 l4
7' z.
re ea 7'/ Pe s I< isic y Se>pro u~4e
ge, P cC o Cr g6 CCCTkr rV'ro
7ems f4 ur 8< /ZVrsdd a~ DP'WXSO WC< ~n A'O+ 5 n
0043 (6 75)
MEMORANDUM
TO LOCATION
FROM DATE
SUBJECT JOB NO.
FILE
AR/ a.8'.
2 /A/
avl A?- ~cck4.ku45 4 I
g.bw oQ 0 8P.&I)+
~ ~
I I
0043 {6.75)
MEMORANDUM
o
Aricll~
d +/c7O W /CPoC ChIC'
Su</f Zo dm B'PICch,„ /o o
iSUMECT l 5/5 r0 4) /YOo / JOS NO. e5 4/S o Z~
FILE
ar . A c91 vcr
crsS8
QWCl. crcF1~
CrtAfP
I C. E7 C
c 86At K7 golfC3 Po Cc. elder'c g
c/ /cled
4c r~ r~eOd/ ~ 7rro era'"~ yy.P
cog Yg
cr oCeAuras rs ~u f c o/8' Pr A.
6 ~+~4 4e e cd'~
l4'>
lcm'043
(6 7S)
MEMORANDUM
I.OCATION
DATE
SUBJECT
FIM
EL Expo z.~~> sr~
/0 co z Yz'3e
0043 {6 75)
MEMORANDUM
FROM Oim O CO
SUBJECT
0043 (6 75)
MEMORANDUM
LOCATlON
BATE
o'r/- go
SUBJECT S V JOB NO «5O'S8 Z+5
Ses
I fv( NCa &5 UC d
3co P~6 Sac/C
C Vi
aced C C
~c'& /8i nfl ~
Pr (
0043 t6 75)
MEMORANDUM
L.OCATION
OATE P
SUBJECT
ALE
. 7
HA5nhQyv( T p+'TEL
P c
l Ald lei g~A A~DAU A A7 J'h.A I
-So s lEvi7-ak
p ogpu, g~
0043 (0 7S)
MEMORANDUM
BATE 19
SUBJECT
Ic/~R W+M4zFM~'I, l(a awe"d
Zo$4 ZE v'I 7
egg
AFerfTFL
8&erezQUA-7)Q e v Co R p
5 $4u/+~pg
0043 (6 75)/0 /I sx- /0:doe+,
g wH~~oM c SAr&~c8&MH~~
l<Qiz/g ~
'lPr~/~4')W'P. ~QA
N g~c /~We ~~~mrs.a+zo~
P ~C<'raw W
u
~lac'cnerZiw+za W + ~ ~~~ PPw~yH«J ~~c ~rD ~n'W'g
prmggu e~ > hAn~~l 8 ~~A- (@+ Zgw~c ~ ~p, P &~wc.~~a.W
~QPMu'~ Mw~ pr~ 7S ~~ t /co4 4r~~w~~lc n'a Mo m.
Wi I 8/W ~CCW~~ycg~+
f <wr e. C+8e~ ~ ca~g a/ M '9 -Qv'~HZ
~C%&Qr)yor wow ~ mW~~ N~v/H4 ~~~c7r Ke~ ~n'W)p
proc~~~~~~ W ~ 8 A, m~a. (g~p)rfp? el' ~~~@ rr E /iwcup>cry CAR &cpe<p op
peggy.c4~ 4 + 4i ~ p5'okra/e hi~ p-yr@~wge T ~/) ~~/~n'o'~a% ~e tt cr &~ac/Wr P. ~ ~W +/
QurAWi~<w,
4
k
l
/o
rl gow &aP~r QA~ ~ eC' Y~>
h
o< ~ra a@+ x ~~>~ib~~ ~rrec~ww~~+'>~/~>
op ~i < 8 + ~ewv+ Za/~~a ~n4
giyeua> ~ P
~ c veCeP ~+~, 6 ur>c ~sD
4g ~~/~ i~ rJJrir c~~~,'~4 Wi~+ri4uk ~n ~
Wd M ~%4 ~ / Wwo ~ l+~c
Mme~ ~ ~~m~ro~ g Z~oc~i~ry~aWpo -y~i -~z.
H
4 iffy/g~ (pPri&)5;>hapl H Rose
lllhlH 3 gQ 0'f&8
Q3ee fe
AVVAI Pdhlp, fVh
kh~ go~ Hhl~Q$gf)hi 5Qf7prlkfA
7~~~~Z~
~i~,e~g n(~g.+up~~
ppELguA4 CGg
gaul<dh/~WAX
S u+PRPA'dgepgg
r/~ p/oar
C . )ps 8~+'8 iZc~ c~lz~i 4 A
gc)od~~Wr~4 ~cud.
yaw ewduzaca<+ ~~w~a~ ~ op
p y y( Ppyf pp7urg g~jcpwapr &/ Pp ~+++/
~ ~~~~ ~p~ mls cp&m&7~WM .
i@A/ 5 g"AW<C 'Fgr~+Wr o+z~gr egg
cgv<g ~so/Dea4
~/~~~ . /egg ~fu aM'I
~ <u v$ ~ ~W cr cay + M ~ W 4~r C'P ~~a~/g~t~~y
p~~ @ra~ r~Wie4 ~y~~+Frg u~g ~r~ m/urc>('ye y) 6 r~
+j~r A m~P ~r, z'g>~uaw~P ~ co~Pe~/- ap M~~pe Awe ~ ~ $ + ~o<iP~ 2 ~ p~bt'e.~@<Hei/ ~~/~~ uPi~~ .
dpu~p~~~w X.
I
My"a<+ g — W~~r47u7fa- gg —y~
<r«~ Wu~z
gY(F4&'4
g
C5)~~ W~/Z4 MCu~
J
G'<S@'93Pg ag 4 &eA fZe C'caw~ 2 ochv rg~n pQ er-eM 4/> cpuA~awD . c w~/c immy W Ai~
~wgMrn~ ia ~~~w~igM Mad-M~ ~.k Mow/
~c W~r> (W ~~+~a rz)~ yr ppr gw pcncrw ++~@'~
W r'zltbr of WPr
.
p <yar~K W )<~i ~
~pP r4p
pZogr
~ D~A +~ ~~A gwcpg a ~/ yg H4 «>s 4~~lz/
Pecogdi))~)rog ~~~a-e~~, a~Pie»2 o+-aczr<~~<l
pP~g >du'laD Nay~~/ pZzy. 5) g ~ru4.k <p 4 yP z Pizmzw~P c-4
pp g gzz ~der a Jib g~ A'rouf>v g~pq<dP+~<) qg~)~~~W~o+ ~ ~Ww ~He& +W~PA P+ ~ ~~gp
op~ z~Moy a.I
APPENDIX D
SAMPLE PACKAGES OF ABR REVIEW
,Wo,IiEQ'D
. ARTNO. SIZE Oh~ .vN
T.U,I Erik TEL
SA O~IE:Eg
,:-P a,~~ W Cul<Z "'54DDCF FOX IE; " P/PE" f j'+P (g-p OL 10>jg'"..O'4'XS PIPF= S.j 4/V C4/OAI'.A 0; - C "C<
, I'-S6 SAIW~~E.
pi pI(
PEA, T. T RACE'4BILlT'lI,~EQ,I D
E,L—49I-- ----b 0 PIPE
I/q=-BOPEEP
HOLE,~iBY-Suan) -~—
c.m p3; i
Ir /j"/t ~l
n
I~~II(I
0
I
CoiJC. l NSERTg-C By CI.VII;&P)
~CTYPX
LOCATION PLAN
AREA..2.5'W
SIOe--C-c»sr:
gWS —.-X.->Q6 .~ICC.IE S Et ZO
E5'I='ll. CAlaC. a.T 'I
(C:ON C. =-.=-
~CE VISTSI FIE'LO H07'E,'d )pE~g~ g(S REg '0 Fdg /PCIj,,4
-~ELEVATIONA-A~
8'FV/SF'FR'S-dA'foal g t k'/SF ~ C'OA'0$ CP S Y7
(-4->'4'.O
lb Pfg FQP,gFP'$/F'P h E V I b I 0 N b DCZ-Ora A'll OFSD bY CH K Sg>VR NO'R
FC/= P %,9- -- 855-. 4
REF. pipE- -2S-6 5OWGS. R
STEEVC-
JOB NO, DRAWING NO. PlEV.
IDE I
orR Ess cALf . Rg, .z.',~„~ . pap'y.
urx ar. "»~
DiRECMN
/C),
NEIG~i7
-~i79 @
'<23
YiS~c
- 4'.g r~ ~ ii8D ~
; 78@ ~q t )796:,-77 "a" 4~72 '+
Q(-g
ERE'E~k'
/Z~~-F
~'-'3D4-
-" 288i"'
+ /b/7 -<
~/804 0+~87, v- 4594 Ie
+gg7 /st
, --NOTE S" I,'P'F)FF AJFF BIO -SIDF', .
--- 2-60r7PS,Z. C-OCA C 5 M'F $ 5-CA't.'C.
Bf'57EZSS 4A'OUP
~ 'i«» ~(~!/ItII.IAL O4 7F
. ~,~~,gm cr.<>«.~ZoI ~ P5'g „r gQ jl'> Iiig
Qc I VI I
&op )-fPP.,P -!hi -HI4g4H)
',
EaV PER'Ms-8'EPLT PH/$E 3Z ADRS~ OO VI ~ I ~ NO
PENNSYLVANIA NEER C LlGHT GNPANYALLKNTQNN, PKNNSYLVAN?A
NUSOVEHAHNA$ fKA% tg($ a/C STATION
l UPPORT - PEACTOR ElLDG
near, eo. PPB j2.f -jest<
gyp gr ~ so ~ ms-rrz- r'~-e~g
ff. ~/<1 Zw> 2 "5'C-I
5Tl%
PZ.C. l~..... UN IT:.~.l: 88Se DBB - l 2.f - H14 '4.sar > 2-
ITEM )IO I
NO. AEO'0 I
I
PART oo
0 ESCA IP TI ON
&- -X IQ1PE CS<-AN CALO@) Q -0~
I 2 LK— — I PIP-1=)t P)=, A;I,i
F $ ~
~. p =//+"3!c
'AT'I
5~1$ 4ee45
&IC
fbi'evision ! 2 has been reviewed against the lateit Eng-eertng approve revtston e I erences note wt
230 x
A)GAT '7-RP CK58ILI7f ..'IRtcg, P..
FCIE])BM S'-
g t f c}
"lg m%8P ~cn.aCBV SHOP)I C.mme~
V
, I)
(I
~ 8'V~ ~
I 4 ~
! ~
',I
I
N
QZI Q
,~m|'ATION
PLAN
ca-~ It)IP.t —.
i
{
I
I'~'l
~ r
c ~
Irr Vv
f/b + " O'ONc.
VIST5
Vo M AJ'T raEIct ILIIII
- )QI
his /97m e V)
~AREA "IS 5OL)T5I 0 8 ~ C ceZf'.
p~i~. Z~.W8-~i- .OOC SEC W .. gmcs~Z.
rCci 'IIC CAT GO!IT '1
~,ELEVATION A-A
~ HSHC(A LoCATIO1S Cs loOIT1 oRC
Aclocc Lccalts1 Jsto rs ~ rSAIIICAnottSHALL )I oS 1C:SO OII ASIIrtLI~ I~ rloC ISOLILICICI,
"HANGER -CRl=-I ICAL Rie NO.
5 524JLH3 O
IZED': A5 ~T'Cbrcpt/M
RR I55Uc-cFoRrcoooILL RIIc oIRN ~;- '".Q'jilj; Iv"rr 'vrov'I
II VIS)Os)5 IY CH'tc IS~fi~ FtRO+.Coot,n! ~t vr>IH;YL<„-HIS !IOIYER I, LIGHT CO!NAHY
ALLTIITOWII FTIIIOCrve'VAOIIA
C'.In~ ATSASI CLACTHIC sjAIIOII Hlotr S VIIIT a o ~AN to ILAroCSSCC),
JOB NO,
FC.L 94 f'SO
REF. PIPE )van- >~DWGS.
STEEL ~
DRAWING Ng. 1!l, I
'H'E$gs=. 7018
J
Ini).'I'I'ELD ATTACHI'lE')<7 HT ~.;.Ll&LaL...
'Feq'd
BIICI: I Cells
3/Fi I ~l )'r REI/. IO HAMI)c M~I=I /MILL'0
/- -8/ I C
II
.>~k di~ I V
)INAL kLYI
)E/CIC ACCT
-ILAIL
p rte r lt clSII I
LDI
oc ul T CVv: ur 'y 'er.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~... Noae ~ Over I '/T" thrv 2I/T
Over >/, thrv II/T 70 f Over 2/I"150" F
.. 225'F
l
E)~/PI)'1ivere~ r.'Ai-~. <('.~,
p4TA r'T.VCC
)
BIAE5T~N1
q
„ayp,p' 7H~<!:v,gC
f"~~~ .P~ i+'~ f'l!gr~»
c~p7 (')
VV Cp ~ V(~C ~
httt~,)h 1>
C'7 3
r ('0gP l'~
gttt tg,))"r/~1
"y'r t,Pht )~
/C:6~5 „~ .". j"Cg~P
//f)() ~ Q /gr f)~f
g//gp/~V
'l A CC
~f- W>>~~gg l),'~)
)C,/ +/ f»i'-'f P~ ~
, er.Ei '- i.-rulc .'.a,tro sioux.z'o4px.
z.";,".r.vie SF~a ~, i'm5<'~ Eppes.s choo'p,.
l
iil;fT";:r f '"F
~) ) r~g ~g>t'.! AiL4'-)h. f 1 LJI'+Q„L
K <IVIt'mP)
"Pej, -lr„f -f~l4
v
iVLR< IO Pj-'A
L)[gL sY 'o ~~~ V h A~ h
we vi ~ i ~ eeREM PEERS-;AVER . PERSE Z .Z.&%5 C
PENNSYLVANIA PRER C LIGHT GNPAtIY11LKNYO'NN, PfMNSYLVAMlAI ~ma [)at~ ag~~a~t: aTATtaN
lPE SUPPORT - PEACE'LDG%AN FAIjg~
g% HO.
1fF.
C)
A A tf~e" -l"'A
8856 DBB.=l 2.l - HI4By App'd
Uh.
R".'..s.'V63~ ~ -~ ~ JO
C/gC.'+~1) ~ ) tk)~ PPCh
h
Ct'
(„'v<
',
) f
P
'I
0
SUSuuaHANMA svstNf s.lacYaC S'%Tl0k!
UhllT - 1
CATEGORY ZL RESPONSE FORM
ABR CALC. 8(-"'~~- <L
SUPPORT Mo. ~65 io9- A.c SMUBNCB Mo. i~c
ENQ.'DNQ.RI'-Y. AS.BUlLT RB,Y s/ Fz A,
pc~ ~
Y-''i'-; -8C ~ svsvaM.
AER CA|.C. RE%s10N RaauigaD:YBs NO
RBspQNSB:
,9,~55 wE /7E /AALVSIS'EA'Fu/PMZD g Fau~~d Acc& 7gg y,~',.
5'EE 8 7 T8C+EO d4ZCA'dl/7ld+$
RRRP0NSE BT.m~a.APPQDYED Sv
\w op. ls, 4%4 CASED ''A 'A . she
CALCULATlONSHEET
ORIGINATOR
PROJECT
SUBJECTGSS- f D9- fI<
DATE
CALC. NO.
CHECKED
JOB NO.
SHEET NO
REV. NO.
~p /o/ /gfdic
AE'CI Cap RqfD
le-CoU Cs'L Qs p,pe@ JIJ J)(g Qp~y
~ '
RC<uI.YOf'/
CIPs f I'ATIasJ ( ~~~$ ,
4lc~t, hs-'sea / ~ 43 ( g 2> geo I' II -) g &is7™,lf
L~t s;
-21sI 11 +wggg
2)gii x, 6~" -lf2gg~
x
/4 24 is
~
~'?I/, 3
2 I |Ill IIt'/ir.
(d:8<Kx2
csi
0 ATOR
PROJECT
SUBJECTAs@- /o
CALCULATIONSHEETCALC. NO. REV. NO.
/o /d. h O,) j).Z.DATE I CHECKED DATE
JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
i'tcw 5 l 0 2z g 2 g7'-ii')
~'89 in
CI
l4> qv< ~/r»~~RJ7 ( gi,pw
'c
'R$
P(c ~
AS BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION
SUPPORT TYPE
SUPPORT DWG HO ~<<> " /0 - h'5
ISO DWGs NO,
ENG G DWGs REVs
SHEET 1 OF
DATE /0" I8-
PERFORMED BYl SIGN
PRINTS'~ -w Arse
REVIEWED BYl SIGN MPRI NT lf~rkA'. 4'aa6MP
AS BUILT REVs
SYSTEM FCI — R&~ 5m~
CA Y I
DIFFERENCES RESOLUTION
CATEGORY I DIFFERENCESARE DEEMED ACCEPTABLE
- BY DEFINITIONs
3
AS BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION
SUPPORT DIGS NOS @~PE - IOg- H 5 SHEET 2 OF 2-
DIFFERENCES
CATEGORY IIJonrz
: i RESOI UTION
CATEGORY II I
Pr- c>
arr~ci~~~ 4'IPL54~LA'770/[f5 P/MAoL=.adwc.y ~H cvmD /'AJ B/'~~m/'.77As, f ~5gavE$ '47E&o<v M~
r T~~s z z @JAN
/v]z jy/D//C /d'2 (0
AS BUILT RECONCIL IATION PROGRAM REVIEW
COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING AND AS BUILT PIPE SUPPORT DETAILYELLOW"OUT PROCESS)
PERFOR>'ED BY,'OSS A. g/ Ah/G0PRINT NAME S IGNATURE
/0-)0 —82'ATE
PEcd f84 7'-z~QORGANIZATION
PERFORMED'YES
SIGNATURE PP L
REVIEWS) BY: ZASXla T. SEalanl(IF YES) PRINT NANE SIGNATURE
/o —gzDATE OR IZATION
ITEMHo.
3
--2I I S(VAY STRUT ASSY' .Dg PIPE~ I .SA 106 GRB'- W= 3 4 LOAC= 6 i'0 Wr,
(PIPE)'/
(T,PI '0 —A.193 GR 37ROD - L PL=SA-36'(OR SA.515GRG5)'BX 20 g'-(u" I G.
2'/S" W,2O" X. - I' -Ok-'%-SI5 gP,'-0 .«) e "I FIE<Zg
Q-SCAN'
. WI+ j.(os& ~
~;« ~L.uLIH- ),>
,'~x~vrr, / .2,g 2- - ,Y a7.
,X
EXI~>l'I«
'', N
h«(~3
~lu.i~t
rh
, I IdLA I'AQ
i'-.O~fiM|'.F<VV3
'= y'-IO%v",RE'I=3 "-
.'-'- PLb 4 "VIE'hthjr'OTER,„,LOCATIONI'tAN.AREA—..~-
~ .'ELEVATIONA.A
"=', syP
I. HANGER-'" == ". CRITICAL
3. SEISMIC CATEGORY4. RAOIATIONZONE ~a, SP EC IAL SHOP P R IMER
" ',REQD. PER SPEC. 8856.GAA. 5.2''~
r:CNis~ ~'ANT LhfBF3ICAt(T=i ~ D >EH SPEC
(3)
~f«ARK.NQ.-'-GBB -< 9 =H«~
-REVI~MP FEP='~" ~i'I.1'- - PHA~~'-- '~Pg 5KH r C.
SY ~ D%%) %JfV SI04 SThSh E > I s I o N s QCp:O~g',
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANYALLENTOWN,PENNSYLVANIA
SUSQUEHAJ4NA STEhN E LECTR IC STATIONUNIT 1 4 UNIT 2
'rc".I= F~'9-'8C ~ 5'E'2(lqREI'.
"-<-I C 2
iPE SUPPOF t REACTOR BLDG. Q DRA'NING NO. REV
,jl rrr,
DJREC7,':!,ON AFl88T 7'AERMAI.'crNM~L/—~ ~'VPOf7 ~
'FMf%GENG-T
1
«
I
1 '4%I%740et> «'ax, eo-.-"GB9- f09- H6-
'gQ „'REV. PER 4S', BUILT, PHASE-'III'LiOADS . ~, WT SKH P g5tv aTtI
A t V «1 «0 N t SY CH'O«
«
PENNSYLVANIA POWER C LIGHT CONPANYAI.LENTONN, PENNSYLVANIA
VSOUEHANNA f$EAH KbK/jh/C SVAVlON
~-;~F.CI= P49-.863 5E'z.
REF.' M- 27-3-9 "
7~gg ''-C I55'''I" "'323 5
PiPE SUPPCIRT -R'EACTOR BLDG.t" Q'hAWING NO. hKV.
R- H- R. UNlT- I 8856 . „:GB'Et"-,.l09:-HS "pgp ""3" '
1
: ~ ',"..I "I* ..'s -,-., ",',"',."..,„',: . PgEEDINg."REQUIREhhENT$ ","~.'RL'
~
', jg pjEL.%61':,Mjp,,IIeq CI *::":'< Certified'Correcf?
''''W
vr~ ~ ~ f
l1 I ~ l
II%
" Zll" SWAY STRUT"ASSY C*.D. PIPE- I " 'A106 GRB'W ~ 9 ' LOAC'~"5 0' EIPIPE)
/PH76~REAR'BRKT..PI LI -'A-la3 GR'37ROD'~"'S -3 'PL'L1II PLr SA'36."(OR
S'A-'5'15GRGG)'WI8
IC M 0''-~ I')
/ a - M "' 8;v'
I31
I W'I+;g (o(P 5gfJJl llMl4)'S
)»I I Il!
I.
4f
AQ:*" '-OFILu'..CfC%'C) =
$'-Ia~ iul '418 ~ I (GI I
IA,... y-Z)4
Ia mI,S'
@ '214 '-L
Ch II
lopez
( ffiI =To'ff.I4-0 I
AREA'
NOTE
gagL
f7)I'Xlfloils 15 I orro A ~ ENSI ~ LLIIICO OOIOE LILIES OqLZ
JAL ~X IOII LISEO f01 vlRIflCAIIOR>I Of II 4"'I'IILI PANG R I ITI
d. SEISMIC CATEGORY'.,RAOIATIONZOt4& ~
5, SPECIAL SHOP PRI.,'IIERIll-
R EQD. P ER. SP.".C.'885o-G~AR :5
(QS
'LEVATION~fWALASRLIN,T DRAVrlNG 8 I . -i ~ aNQ fUS CHGS/REDUNEVV/Q ARRV Qf LD gfE fO/ISQI fINALREVIEW
EN~G Nls NEE HANGERI rt/QclLccEFKD
IE AtRV~ - ~ fE ARRV
~P: .~4. >~I. ATIGa I
Sii 4LtIT ' ICrSNT
RI ~ -I ~ ~ ~
RK IQ af 2
It I Y I e I 0 IO I, ~+Qtzf-OJQ vl
AMIAPONER 5 i.]QHT COOttPAP4Y
LLENTOITSe, PEFSt4SYLVANIA'.WA XTK~KLR~IICSTATlOPC
UNIT 1 4 VISIT 2
Ocr t',~ACTOR BLDG.
IiJWIT;'I"
, IY ~ Qggg ~ DOO CTROv
" ari. '/g4
~ \
HEATING REQUIREMENTS FOR WEiDING
Ph'...
70'F Over 2'/I" ..........'..... 225'F
I
+!=,: ~ I I "" ' f*'"I~ <'--.PQL IE7 lid~"-~-'.----'-r
~ 1 ~
r
C
h
'~ \I \ ~ SPh ~ I 1 ~
F'-zG
ZT<E44 CANC,NO .~@~ 4 R8v.
T'fPZ=-: CWG PYRE'Eg7'gAI A7
;- DIQECTlON- Y'MR~<A{.
-tl99
+oa~~c,/VP SEl
"'lOG fgMfRGENC 'f
+ 2067|
PAVL7gg
+ 2067t
IA4V PIIt4)
pEV. PEP p,g gUlgT PHASE GT LOADS.4V I 4 I 0 III
, maX ho, GBB-f09-H6MUTISM Pl 5bY 'CH'Q, KHO SWSt
PENNSYLYANIA PStER 4 LIGHT COMPANYALLKhlTOVN, PENHSYl.VAHIA
'SUSOLPCHAHKA )$ KAJ4 KtK)fRj| STATION
PClRT -REACTOR BLDt-.
.H. R. UNf7- l
L4N 4AAPC~
JOS HO.
8856
hEF,UNCS.
~ -.-FCl- P49-863I ezM- P7-9 "9C - l55- l 23-5
Q '44AVn44a 4 /g ~~~,~ aaV.
GBB-l03-HG'/p'h
II
h
/Q~P l~~ - P.ut~y. f<IJCgP'P tl 'A~&II >/'<! -lQ5PG'CT lO~ .A~ BOY >I I
~ /
V h
IT
\C~
0
APPENDIX E
LIST OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION
OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED
THE 401 SCOPE — CAT. I
1 HBB-118-Hl2 HBB-116-H2
AnchorStrut
1 HBB-125-H3HBB-125-H2HBB-128-HlHBB-127-H2HBB-127-H3HBB-126-H2
GuideSnubberGuideStrutStrutSnubber
'0121314
DBB-122-H27DBB-122-H17DCA-103-HllDBB-122-H23DBB-122-H25DCA-103-H9DBB-122-H16DBB-122-H18DBA-101-H4DCA-103-HlDCA-103-HjDCA-103-H8DCA-103-H2DCA-103-H4
RodAnchorGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutSpringGuideGuideStrutSnubberSnubber
stem: HPCI1
234567
89
10ll12131415161718192021222324
DBB-120-HlHBB-109-H8DBB-114-HllDBB-120-H30HBB-107-H3DBB-114-H12DBB-114-H13DBB-114-H18DBB-114-H19DBB-114-H20DBB-114-H31DBB-120-H4DBB-120-H20DBB-120-H31EBB-102-H6EBB-102-H8EBB-102-H9EBB-102-H12EBB-102-H13EBB-102-H18EBB-102-H19EBB-102-H24EBB-102-H25HBB-108-H4
RodAnchorGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut
0
he 401 Sco e Cat. I 6 II Con't.
stem:252627282930313233343536
HPCI Con't.HBB-108-H15HBB-109-HlHBB-109-HllHBB-152-HlHBB-152-H2DBB-120-H18DBB-120-H22EBB-102-H21HBB-108-H13DBA-102-H5DBB-114-H28HBB-108-H6
StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutSnubberSnubberGuideGuideStrutStrutStrut
6
7
89
10111213141516171819202122-2324252627282930313233343536373839
DBB-121-H14HBB-102-H15HBB-120-H23DBB-109-H13DBB-121-H23DBB-121-H25EBB-103-H4HBB-101-H6HBB-102-H16DBB-109-H2DBB-109-H4DBB-109-H9DBB-109-HllDBB-109-H14DBB-112-H3DBB-121-HlDBB-121-H2DBB-121-H4DBB-121-H5DBB-121-H6DBB-121-H8DBB-121-H9DBB-121-HloDBB-121-H12DBB-121-H15DBB-121-H17DBB-121-H19DBB-121-H20DBB-121-H22DBB-121-H24EBB-103-H5HBB-101-HlHBB-101-H3HBB-102-Hl
1 HBB-113-HllHBB-113-H15HBB-113-H17DBB-109-H20DBB-112-H2
RodRodRodAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut.StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut
e 401 Sco e — Cat. I & II Con't.
stem:404142434445464748495051
.525354555657585960616263
RCIC Con't.HBB-102-H3HBB-102-H4HBB-102-H17HBB-103-H2HBB-109-H12HBB-113-HlHBB-113-H2HBB-113-H6HBB-113-H7HBB-113-H9HBB»113-H10HBB-113-H12HBB-113-H13HBB-113-H14HBB-113-H19HBB-113-H20HBB-113-H21DBB-112-HlDBB-121-H13HBB-101-H4DBB-109-HjDBB-109-H24HBB-101-H14DBA-105-H15
StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSnubber
Snubber
Snubber 5 StrutGuideSC-rut
101112131415161718192021222324
GBB-103-H3GBB-103-H4GBB-103-H5HBB-104-HlHBB-104-H14HBB-104-H32GBB-101-HlGBB-101-H3GBB-101-H7GBB-101-HllGBB-101-H16GBB-101-H18GBB-101-H21GBB-101-H31GBB-102-H7
25 GBB-103-H226 GBB-103-H6
HBB-104-H22.27
1, GBB-101-H42 GBB-101-H23
GBB-101-H36GBB-101-H9GBB-101-H26GBB-101-H28GBB-102-H4GBB-102-H12GBB-.102-H16
RodRodAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut
401 Sco e — Cat. I 8 II Con't.
S stem: CS Con't.282930
'3132333435363738394041
HBB-104-H29HBB-104-H31HBB-104-H36HBB-104-H40GBB-101-H22GBB-102-H3GBB-102-HllGBB-101-H41HBB-104-HloHBB-104-HllHBB-104-H12DCA-107-H18DCA-109-H6GBB-102-Hlo
StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberStrutSnubberGuide
8 2 Struts8 2 Struts5 2 Struts
S stem: RHR1
2
34567
89
10ll12131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536
GBB-110-H22GBB-106-H7GBB-109-H8GBB-109-H21GBB-110-H28HBB-111-H19HBB-120-H24HBB-120-H25HBD-184-H2GBB-105-H4GBB-105-H8GBB-107-H9GBB-109-H28GBB-110-H18GBB-110-H33GBB-110-H36GBB-110-H37GBB-111-H3GBB-111-H7GBB-115-H7GBB-115-H8GBB-115-HllGBB-118-H3GBB-118-H4GBB-118-H5GBB-118-H9GBB-118-HloGBB-118-HllDBB-115-H5DBB-115-H7DBB-115-H14DBB-115-H15DBB-115-H18DBB-115-H19GBB-104-H2GBB-104-H5
RodAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut
„ 401 Sco
S stem:
e — Cat. I & IICon't.'HR
Con't.3738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
GBB-104-H20GBB-104-H23GBB-104-H33GBB-104-H38GBB-104-H45GBB-106-H2GBB-106-H14GBB-106-H22GBB-107-H3GBB-107-H4GBB-107-H5GBB-107-H16GBB-107-H20GBB-107-H24GBB-107-H27GBB-107-H30GBB-107-H32GBB-108-H2GBB-108-H4GBB-109-HloGBB-109-H12GBB-109-H19GBB-109-H20GBB-110-H3GBB-110-HllGBB-110-H14GBB-110-H16GBB-110-H41GBB-ill-H6GBB-112-H19GBB-114-H4GBB-115-H2GBB-115-H4GBB-115-H12GBB-118-H22HBB-110-H14HBB-110-H15HBB-110-H16HBB-110-H31HBB-110-H34HBB-110-H41HBB-110-H49HBB-111-H8HBB-ill-H14HBB-ill-H36HBB-113-H23HBB-120-H3HBB-120-H4HBB-120-H14GBB-104-HjGBB-104-H35GBB-106-H23GBB-114-H2
StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut
— StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSpring
he 401 Sco e — Cat. I 8 II Con't.
S stem: RHR Con't.90919293949596979899
100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142
DBB-107-HllDBB-115-H8DBB-115-H9GBB-104-H8GBB-104-HloGBB-104-H18GBB-104-H21GBB-104-H40GBB-104-H42GBB-104-H47GBB-104-H52GBB-104-H54HBB-110-H3HBB-110-H12HBB-110-H21HBB-110-H35HBB-110-H36HBB-110-H37HBB-110-H38HBB-110-H39HBB-111-H30HBB-111-H31DCA-111-H3GBB-109-H26GBB-109-H27GBB-112-H17GBB-112-H18GBB-120-H2GBB-120-H4GBB-120-H6GBB-120-H7GBB-120-H8GBB-120-HloGBB-120-H11GBB-120-H12GBB-120-H15GBB-120-H16GBB-120-H18GBB-120-H19GBB-120-H20GBB-120-H21GBB-120-H22GBB-120-H23GBB-120-H24GBB-120-H25GBB-120-H26GBB-120-H33HBB-120-H19HBB-120-H20HBB-120-H21HBB-120-H22DCA-111-H31DCA-111-H34
SpringSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrut
he 401 Sco e — Cat. I 6 II Con't.
S stem: RHR Con't.143144145146147148149150
DCB-102-H3HBB-120-H15HBB-120-H16HBB-120-H18DCA-108-H1DCA-111-H2DCA-111-H37GBB-104-H49
StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSnubberSnubber
THE 401 SCOPE — CAT. I, II & III
1 DBB-114-H5HBB-109-H3DBB-114-H30DBB-117-H8DBB-114-H8DBA-102-H4EBB-102-H20HBB-109-HloDBB-120-H5
StrutStrutAnchorSnubberStrutStrutStrutAnchorAnchor
stem1
234567
89
101112
DBB-109-HlHBB-113-H8HBB-113-H16DBB-121-H7EBB-103-H2HBB-113-H18HBB-101-H8DBB-109-H3DBB-121-HllDBB-121-H16HBB-101-H9HBB-113-H24
GuideAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutAnchorGuide
1 DBB-122-H92 DBB-122-Hlo
DCA-102-H16DCA-102-HljDBB-122-H7
GuideGuideAnchorAnchorAnchor
stem: CS
1
23456789
101112131415
HBB-104-H37HBB-104-H19GBB-103-H8GBB-101-H34HBB-104-H38GBB-101-H6GBB-101-H15HBB-104-H2GBB-101-H30GBB-102-H2GBB-102-H15HBB-104-H25HBB-104-H17GBB-101-H32GBB-101-H35
"GuideSpringGuideStrutStrutRodGuideStrutStrutGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutAnchor
stem: RHRHBB-ill-H9GBB-106-H16GBB-120-H3GBB-107-H8
AnchorAnchorGuideStrut
S stem: RHR567
89
10111213141516
DCA-111-H30DCA-111-H27DCA-111-H35DBB-115-H20GBB-118-H8GBB-109-H13GBB-115-H10GBB-107-HllGBB-107-H34GBB-115-H13GBB-104-H27GBB-104-H28
GuideStrutStrutStrutGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutSnubber
S stem: RHR Con't.1
23456
7
89
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
GBB-110-H9GBB-104-H9DBB-115-H6GBB-118-H20GBB-120-HlHBB-111-H17GBB-118-H16GBB-109-H6GBB-107-H25GBB-118-H15HBB-111-H20HBB-110-H6HBB-110-H23HBB-120-H13HBB-120-H17GBB-106-H13GBB-109-H18GBB-110-H12GBB-115-H6GBB-104-H31GBB-104-H36GBB-105-HlGBB-104-HlGBB-104-H4GBB-104-H24HBB-111-H32GBB-106-HllGBB-109-H31HBB-111-H29GBB-118-H17GBB-120-H14GBB-115-H9
AnchorStrutAnchorGuideGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutSnubberSnubberSnubber,SpringStrutSnubberSnubberStrutStrutSnubberGuideGuideAnchor
List of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment)
S stem:EBD-113-H10 Category I, II & III
S stem:
S stem:*** 3* 4
S stem:
HBB-118-HlHBD-182-H35HBD-llll-HlHBD-1112-Hl
HBD-129-H24HBD-129-H25HBD-130-H17HBD-130-H18
HCD-101-H4HCB-101-Hl
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
CategoryCategory
I & III, II & IIIII, II & III
I & III & III & III& II
I & III, II & III
S stem: CIGJCD-115-H44 Cateogry I & II
S stem: CONDENSATEEBD-114-H26EBD-114-H33
CategoryCategory
S stem.
S stem:
GBB-101-H35GBB-101-H36HCD-111-H4HCD-115-H5
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
I, II & IIII & III, II & IIII, II & III
1
234567
89
10*11*12
ayg15161718
HBD-59-H22HBD-59-H23HBD-59-H24HBD-60-H4HDB-60-H10HBD-60-H13HBD-60-H16HBD-99-H18HBD-99-H19HBD-99-H20HBD-1053-H25HBD-1054-H40HBD-1055-H6HBD-1056-H40HBD-3001-H9HBD-3001-H12HBD-3001'-H14HBD-3003-H9
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
II, II & IIII & III, II & IIII, II & IIII$ II & IIII, II & IIII, II & IIII & III & III, II & IIII & IIII & II
Category I & IICategory I & IICatgory I, II & III
ist of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment) Cont'd.
S stem: CW (Cont'd.)19202122232425
JBD-114-H44JBD-114-H50JBD-114-H51JBD-114-H52JBD-119-H32JBD-119-H56JBD-119-H57
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
I, IT. S IT.II, II & IIII, II & IIII, II S IIII & III, II & IIII, II S III
S stem: DIESEL AUXILIARIESHBC-5-H13HBC-8-H12HBC-11-H40HBC-13-H26
S stem:
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
?&III, II &
I & III, II S
IIIIII
'10ll12131415161718192021222324'5262728293031
35363738
HRC-3-H18HRC-3-H24HRC-3-H25HRC-3-H31HRC-3-H32HRC-3-H38HRC-3-H39HRC-3-H45HRC-5-H5HRC-9-H20HRC-9-H21HRC-9-H23HRC-9-H27HRC-9-H28HRC-9-H31HRC-9-H32HRC-9-H35HRC-10-H5HRC-13-H13HRC-14-H2HRC-14-H10HRC-16-H4HRC-101-H3HRC-101-H18HRC-101-H20HRC-102-H1HRC-102-H2HRC-102-H14HRC-103-H4HRC-104-H4HRC-105-H6HRC-105-HjHRC-105-H15HRC-106-H16HRC-106-H17HRC-106-H21HRC-107-H2HRC-108-H4
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryNoneCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
I&III & III & III & IIII S III, II S
II, II &
I S IIII&III, II &
I & IIII&III S II
IIIIII
III
I&III&II'I, II &
I & III, II S
I S III, II &
IIIIIIIII
I, II &
I, II &
I, II S
I, II &
I, II &
I, IT. S
I & II
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I, II &
I & III
I & III, II S III
ist of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment) Cont'd.
S stem ESW (Cont'd.)3940414243444546474849
S stem:1
2
S stem:
'stem:1
234567
S stem:
HRC-109-H4HRC-110-H4HRC-116-H3HRC-123-HlHRC-134-HlHRC-205-H28HRC-206-H12HRC-214-H4JRD-129-HllJRD-140-H5JRD-141-H7
HBC-114-HlHBD-1048-H8
DBD-101-H32DBD-101-H33DBD-101-H34DBD-113-H7DBD-122-H2
DBB-144-H30DBB-120-H5EBB-102-H17EBB-102-H22HBB-109-H8HBB-109-HloHCD-114-Hl
HBD-156-H42HBD-158-H5
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
CategoryCategory
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
CategoryCategory
I & IIII, II &
II, II &
I & III, II &
I, II &
I, II &
I, II &
I
I, II &
I$ II &
I & IZI, II &
II & III & II
I, II &
I, II &
I, II &
I, II &
I & III, II &
I, II &
I & III, II &
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
S stem: MAIN STEAMDBB-105-H12
S stem:GBB-131-Hl
S stem:
Category
Category
I, II &
I & II
<
6* 7
8
9
DBB-109-H20DBB-112-H2DBB-121-H7DBB-121-H14EBB-103-H2HBB-101-H9HBB-102-H7HBB-102-H15HBB-113-H8
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
I & III & III, II &
I & III, II &
I, II &
I, II &
I & III, II &
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
All Ph III A chors (Inside and Outside of Containment) (Cont'd.)
S stem:1011
S stem:
RCIC (Cont'd.)HBB-113-H16HBB-120-H23
EBD-110-H21
Category I, II &
Category I & XI
Category X, II &
XII
S stem: RHR
1
A 234567
89
1011
*17*18
192021222324
S stem:
DBB-115-H6DCB-102-H2GBB-106-H7GBB-106-H16GBB-109-H8GBB-109-H21GBB-110-H9GBB-110-H28GBB«115-H9GBC-105-H4HBB-111-H2HBB-111-H9HBB-111-H19HBB-120-H24HBB-120-H25HBD-184-H2HBD-186-H2HBD-186-H4HCD-112-H23HRC-2-H12HRC-2-H13HRC-114-H5HRC-101-HlHRC-16-H2
CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory
I, II & IIIX, II & IIXI&IXI, II & IIII, II & IIII & III, IX & XIXI&II.I, IX & IXXI, XI & IIXI, IX & IIII, II & IXII & III & III& III & XII, IX & IIIX&III & IIX & III, IX & IIII, IX & IIXII, IX & III
S stem:
GBB-134-HlHBB-147-HlHBB-147-H5
Category I, II &
Category I & XICategory I, II &
IIIIIX
1
234
* 5*
DBB-122-H7DBB-122-H17DBC-101-H12DBC-102-H21DCA-102-H16DCA-102-H17
Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,
II & IIIII & XIIII & IIIII & IIIII & IIIII & III
S stem:1
SPCUHBD-173-H10 Category I & II
f A 1 Ph III A hors (Inside and Outside of Containment) (Cont'd.)
S stem:JRD-107-H9JRD-128-H7JRD-129-Hl
Category ICategory I, II 8 IIICategory I, II 8 III
* Designates anchors inside of containment.